Still confused with different ABAP versions

Hi folks,
does anybody have an idea where I could possibly find a comparisson of the different ABAP versions (ABAP runtime environments) in order to find out the changes especially coming from 4.6C to the next versions SAP WAS 7.0.
Especially in ABAP Objects I expect some changes. Could anybody post a good source on that?
Thanks for your help
bye
Torsten

Not sure where to find that stuff but here is a little rundown.
One thing about classes, is that there is now the Friends tab where you can define a friends relationship to other classes
There has been quite a lot of changes to the ABAP runtime including the inclusion of a full web server and the ICF(Internet Communications Framework) This allows for such things like Web Services, BSP(Business Server Pages) and Web Dynpro.
Other things that are new are Shared Memory Objects, Persistent Objects, ABAP Units, Adobe Interactive Forms, the New Debugger, and the new ABAP Editor.
This is just to name a few.
Regards,
Rich Heilman

Similar Messages

HT201342 I'm still confuse with this iCloud mail. I have 2 device which is iPhone and iPad, why every time I receive a mail from my iPhone it doesn't show on my iPad? Can you maybe help me out here thank you

I'm still confuse with this iCloud mail. I have 2 device which is iPhone and iPad, why every time I receive a mail from my iPhone it doesn't show on my iPad? Can you maybe help me out here thank you

The iphone and ipad must be connected to the same icloud account. Are you by chance using different IDs to connect from each device?

Setup Central Contract Management SRM 7.01 with differing release versions

Hello experts,
OSS note 1268821 explains how to configure the central contract management between a SRM 7.0 and an ERP 6.04. So far so good, but how should it be handled if there are differing release versions such as ERP 6.04 and ERP 6.03? I guess that a technical split (xml services/ ALE distribution) is necessary?
Assuming that there are some backends with differing release versions and in some cases with differing master data (not supported by central master data client) would you always go via PI? Independent of release version, technology and master data.
Could you give some further detailed informations how to configure such a scenario? What has to be done to transfer existing contracts from an ERP 6.04 into SRM CM component (migration concept)?
Thanks!!!
KR Thorsten

Hi Thorsten
The minimal ECC version is 6.0 EHP4, Central Contracts require certain business functions in ECC to be activated and as these are included within ECC EHP4 you won't have these available in lower version. Therefore you won't be able to operate central contracts in such an ECC system.
You would either have to go with patching these systems or go with GOA's for these systems.
Operating central contracts via PI or SOA i believe provide almost similar functionality. SOA however requires an SRM EHP1 system and ECC EHP5 back-end to operate whilst central contracts configured via PI can be operated onwards from an SRM 7.0 and EHP4 system.
I can't help you on your migration issue, maybe someone else can.
Kind regards,
Tim

Live Migration with Different CPU versions on the hosts, win 2012R2 Datacenter

Hello
This question have been asked in different forums but when I read the the thread's I feel that I get mixed answers.
And most answers are dating from 2012 (Win 2008R2), I don't know if they are still correct in win 2012R2.
So now I ask the question myself and hope to get at clear answer :)
We are in the process of installing a new Hyper-V cluster using Win srv 2012 R2 Datacenter as OS.
I'm planning to re-use some of the "old" servers from our current Hyper-V 2008 R2 cluster, removing it from the cluster and do a clean installation of 2012R2 Datacenter.
But I will need to buy two new servers to manage this (with a new version of CPU, same brand (AMD))
Old server: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6172 (12 Cores)
New server:
AMD Opteron™ 6344 (12-core)
Now my question:
Will Live Migration work between these servers in my new cluster without me doing any special settings in hyper-v or in the VM or what do I need to do to get this to work?
/Anders

Hi,
It is important that all the hardware supporting Windows Server 2012 Failover Clusters be certified to work with Windows Server 2012.
In a cluster where all the nodes of the cluster are exactly the same, hardware migration is fairly straightforward. There are no concerns about differences in hardware, and
especially no concerns about different capabilities of the CPUs.
More information:
When to Use Processor Compatibility Mode to Migrate Virtual Machines
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/gg299590.aspx
Hope this helps.
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

CK24 - mark and release with different costing version

Hi,
We are currently using standard costing variant PPC1 and costing version 1 to mark and release the standard costs. However when we try to recost the material cost due to price changes, system does not allow to mark & release revised standard cost if we try to mark & release on same day. pls note standard cost estimate is already released for the month. And we do not want to delete existing standard cost estimate. Instead we want to explore other options. We are using 4.7.
My questions are :
a) Can recost using costing version 2? CK11N allows to save the costing result. However in CK24 Marking allowance, system does not allow to change Costing Version. is there any config option to change this.
b) If we cannot use different cost version, can we update material cost with same costing variant (PPC1) and costing version (1) in this case. However when we tried to do recost with same costing variant & verison on same day, system gives an error 'Material AAAA in plant MMM has a released cost estimate.'
Any inputs on above issue highly appreciated.
thanks
Sunil

Hi,
While, you can use any of the Costing versions to mark & release Standard cost estimate, you can release Cost estimate only once in a fiscal period. If you want to release correct prices, then you have delete existing released cost estimates using CKR1 transaction and then re-run CK40N to release.
Hope this helps.

Shared Listener with different oracle versions

Hi,
I have configured the following shared listener for two databases running with different versions.
I have started the O02TXN3-9i along with the shared listener and then listener was started with 9i version and then I brought up the O01TXN3 -10g.
Please let me know whether I can connect to the 10g database O01TXN3 remotely with shared listener.
Note: Please find listener and oratab files below.
Your early response is much appreciated.
Database O01TXN3 with 10g
Database O02TXN3 with 9i
==== Listener.ora File ======
TNS_DTXN03 =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS=
(PROTOCOL=IPC)
(KEY= O01TXN3.world)
(ADDRESS=
(PROTOCOL=IPC)
(KEY= O01TXN3)
(ADDRESS=
(PROTOCOL=IPC)
(KEY= O02TXN3.world)
(ADDRESS=
(PROTOCOL=IPC)
(KEY= O02TXN3)
(ADDRESS =
(COMMUNITY = tcpcom)
(PROTOCOL = TCP)
(Host = dtxn03)
(Port = 1525)
STARTUP_WAIT_TIME_TNS_DTXN03 = 0
CONNECT_TIMEOUT_TNS_DTXN03 = 10
LOG_DIRECTORY_TNS_DTXN03 =/dtxn03/txn/oracle/admin
TRACE_LEVEL_TNS_DTXN03 = OFF
SID_LIST_TNS_DTXN03 =
(SID_LIST =
(SID_DESC =
(SID_NAME = O01TXN3)
(ORACLE_HOME = /dtxn03/txn/oracle/10.2.0-64)
(SID_DESC =
(SID_NAME = O02TXN3)
(ORACLE_HOME = /dtxn03/txn/oracle/9.2.0-64)
# Added to get rid of the "inbound connection timed out (ORA-3136)"
INBOUND_CONNECT_TIMEOUT_TNS_DTXN03 = 180
==
Oratab:
#LISTENER:/dtxn03/txn/oracle/9.2.0-64
O01TXN3:/dtxn03/txn/oracle/10.2.0-64:Y
O02TXN3:/dtxn03/txn/oracle/9.2.0-64:Y

As a general rule, only one listener is required for a machine as long as all database versions are currently supported. (In other words one listener for Oracle7 and Oracle11g will not work.)
As a general rule, an old listener MAY not be able to handle the features of the newer database (such as transferring blobs was a limitation in Oracle8). Therefore use the newest listener to handle all the databases.
As a general rule, listeners can be considered independent of databases in a sense similar as ASM. Therefore it's not a bad idea to have a separate ORACLE_HOME specifically to install the listener. This is especially useful if you have multiple databases with differing service level agreements,
I'd want to see
1) the output of lsnrctl status
2) any console session stuff and copy/paste to be surrounded by preview tages as described in the FAQ (http://www.oracle.com/technology/forums/faq.html#q14)

Access two EAS with different Essbase versions and different java versions from the same p.c.

Hi,
I need to regularly access Essbase 11.1.2.2. and Essbase 11.1.2.3 EAS from the same client machine.
They are on, and must be on, different versions of java, is there a way to have both versions of java installed but each using the correct version and without the two java versions causing any kind of problems?
thanks,
Robert.

Hi Robert... I assume this is web-launched?
I spent a day or so trying understand the intricacies of the JNLP protocol and create shortcuts that will invoke web-launched EAS with the appropriate version of Java. I can get one version of EAS to use the 1.6 Java Web Launcher, and the other version of EAS to use the 1.7 Java Web Launcher - but both Web Launchers eventually invoke the same version of Java! There are switches in the JNLP syntax that seem like they should allow you choose the actual Java version that gets invoked, but I just could not make it work.
You can use the Java Control Panel (in Control Panel) to enable and disable the relevant versions before launching EAS.
If you find otherwise I would love to know (or if you find out how to control which versions are enabled or disabled via command-line script).

Device type file compatability with different SAP versions

Hi All,
         I need to know whether there is any difference in Device type file (.PRI) for different SAP versions [ SAP 4.6b , 4.6c, 4.7, mySAP ERP 2005.,]
         Is there any change in .pri file required when upgrading/degrading SAP versions?
        Pls let me know abt this. very urgent..

i tried the following code on a WAS 7.00 SP14 and it works as expected.
create object cached_response type cl_http_response exporting
add_c_msg = 1.
    cached_response->set_data( file_content ).
    cached_response->set_header_field( name =
if_http_header_fields=>content_type
                                       value = file_mime_type ).
    cached_response->set_status( code = 200 reason = 'OK' ).
    cached_response->server_cache_expire_rel( expires_rel = 180 ).
    call function 'GUID_CREATE'
      importing
        ev_guid_32 = guid.
    concatenate runtime->application_url '/' guid into display_url.
    cl_http_server=>server_cache_upload( url      = display_url
                                         response = cached_response ).
call method runtime->server->response->redirect( url = display_url ).
navigation->response_complete( ).

Costing on Internal Orders with different plan versions

Hi,
Is it possible to carry out Costing on Internal Orders using different plan versions?
I would like to carry out more than one costing on Internal Order so that I could compare different versions. Maybe there are other parameters (other than plan versions) which can be used for executing different parallel costing.
Best wishes,
Karol

Hi Karol,
In Release 3.0, the following new planning functions are available in order planning:
<b>Copy plan versions</b>
In Release 3.0, you can plan order costs for internal orders in different versions. In contrast to earlier releases, you can now
1. change versions
2. copy versions
3. Here you can select :
the planned values to be copied: annual or total values
whether the planned values in the target version are to be retained or overwritten compare versions using the information system
Planned values are not revaluated in the target version (for example, when you change the value date).
Overhead and settlements are not copied and, if required, must be repeated in the target version
Regards,
Hemachandra K S
<b>Please, donot forget to mark the answer as Helpful, Very Helpful or Problem solved.</b>

Matchcode problem with different GUI versions

We have upgraded most users to SAP GUI for Windows 640 Final Release. After this upgrade we have encountered an error in the matchcode lookups that the last character in most fields is being dropped so that when the lookup is performed it has an incomplete field for inquiry. Example:; in Sales Office we put in SO20, but when it uses this it drops the last character and performs the lookup with SO2 only.
However, SAP Frontend for Windows 620 Final release, the GUI prior to updating machines does not have the matchcode problem and works correctly.
I hope I have explained this adequately, any help is appreciated.

Hi,
I have this problem during the upgrade, I could not exactly figure it out what will be problem, but i upgrade my SAPGui frontend to 7.10 patch level 3, after that the problem found solved.
SAPGui 7.10 have backward compatiability, so it will work fine with 6.40 version
a®

Catalyst 2960s Stacking with different IOS versions

Hello Forum Team;
When adding a new switch with older ios version to an existing stack (flexstack) does the new switch will be able to join the stack?
Thanks in advanced!

Hi,
In a stack/flexstack all the switches should have exact same IOS version, otherwise there will be a version mismatch on the stack and the new switch will not be able to join the stack.
The following Document contains more info:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps6406/white_paper_c11-578928.html
Thanks
Ankur
"Please rate the post if found useful"

Still Confused with Previews, Thumbnails etc.

Hi All,
So i'm very new to Aperture, and that business about JPEG previews and thumbnails still has me thoroughly confused. So i understand that when you are shooting RAW, when you hit the play button, what you see in the rear screen is the JPEG preview. So when you first view your photos on a computer without importing, is this the same preview? When you then double click onto the photo again without importing, is this the RAW or the JPEG? After importing, without clicking, are you seeing the same JPEG preview or a completely new thumbnail?
I know if you then double click a photo, Aperture processes the photo into actual RAW file. Thing is, this file is very different to the JPEG preview, the photo you saw on the rear screen of your camera. Some are even cropped substantially so that you lose some sky or part of a building. Is this normal? Is there then a way to retain or revert to the JPEG preview you preferred?
Many thanks,

So i understand that when you are shooting RAW, when you hit the play button, what you see in the rear screen is the JPEG preview.
Because the word preview has a paerticular meaning in Aperture (See below) I'll say, yes that's correct but what you see is a Jpeg Version of the photo. In other words, the camera has processed the Raw and applied various fixes and filters and that's what it shows you.
So when you first view your photos on a computer without importing, is this the same preview?
Yes, to save time Aperture will try read that version rather than generate one of its own.
When you then double click onto the photo again without importing, is this the RAW or the JPEG?
What app are you viewing it with now? Aperture? Something else?
After importing, without clicking, are you seeing the same JPEG preview or a completely new thumbnail?
Depends on what you have chosen in the Aperture -> preferences -> Importing pane.
I know if you then double click a photo, Aperture processes the photo into actual RAW file.
No it doesn't, and it's a really big distinction. Aperture processes nothing. When you view a photo Aperture is just showing you the Raw - the unprocessed image that the camera version is based on.
If the camera is cropping and radically altering the image from the raw to the jpeg then I think you need to look at the camera settings. I can't think why a camera would choose to crop a photo when processing it.

Report Generation - Build an exe from a PC with different Office Version

Hi,
I want to build an exe from a VI that uses Report Generation Toolkit. The application has to be deployed on several PCs that use Office 2000. During development phase I installed on my PC, Office 2000 and everything was ok. After I was done with it, I reinstalled Office 2007. So, the Report Generation Toolkit from my PC is for Office 2000 (it was installed when I had Office 2000 on my PC).
These days I had to fix some bugs from my application, I made a new exe but the part that generates Word reports (using RGT) is not working anymore - I received that error with -35...9935 (or something like this).
I tried to search for the problem and I found it: with exactly the same VI's (_Word Dynamic VIs.vi - for Office 2000) the invoke nodes from a PC with Office 2007 and a PC Office 2000 look different. For example in Word_Open_Document.vi, the invoke node Document is different for a PC with Office 2000 + RGT for 2000 and a PC with Office 2007 + RGT for Office 2000 (no mistake).
So, I've tried to copy the VI's from a PC with Office 2000 + RGT 2000 to my PC but I cannot build it because I get the error: There are some errors in _Word Dynamic VIs.vi (the invoke nodes do not fit).
Finally my question is: How can I build the exe on my PC: Office 2007 but with RGT for Office 2000??
Thanks,
Paul
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi,
Thank you for your advice. Can you please tell me what you want to say with the wrapper vi? I don't really understand what you mean.
By the way, I solved the problem. I discovered that the Invoke Nodes are updated based on the Object Library for the ActiveX control (in this case the MS Office). The data types are store in the msword9.olb (version 9 - for office 2000 in Office folder) and msword.olb (version 12 - for office 2007 also in Office folder). I tried to register the msword9.olb (using the regsvr32.exe) but it doesn't work for olb files - I need the ocx or dll. But, if I replace the msword.olb from Office 2007 with msword9.olb from Office 2000 everything work.
Ok, steps that have to be done:
1. Install the RGT for Office 2000 on the PC
2. DO NOT Change anything in _Word_Dynamic VIs.vi. When Office 2007 is installed the VI arrow should be broken (error in VI)
3. Copy the msword9.olb from a system with Office 2000 (or your version) and copy it to your system with Office 2007 with the new name msword.olb. DO NOT FORGET to make a backup of the original MS Office 2007 file and to restore it at the end.
4. After the new msword.olb is there, the _Word_Dynamic VIs.vi should have no error
5. Build your exe application
6. Restore the old msword.olb
7. ENJOY your life !
I hope this is useful also for somebody else.
Paulie

PDF forms and how they work with different Reader versions

I'll start this off by giving a little background information and describing a workflow scenario. I work as an InHouse designer for a company that keeps the majority of the employee population always a few versions behind. Fortunately, for us designers they keep us updated, but it doesn't always play nicely when you're saving your PDFs for older versions of Acrobat Reader.
What happens is that I create a form in InDesign, export a PDF, and then create my form fields in Acrobat Pro 9 on a Mac. After saving for version 9 I then take the PDF and test within the Windows environment which our IT is enforcing Acrobat Reader 7. The PDF opens ok and I can fill out the form, but I cannot save. I then open in Acrobat Pro 7 for Windows and then it gives the option to save or make modifications.
My questions really come down to whether or not Reader 7 is doing this because of how old the technology is, or if that would change if our IT would allow Acrobat Reader 8 or 9? Now I've looked at the Acrobat Pro 9 comparison chart and it states "Enable users of Adobe Reader® (version 8 or later) to fill in and save PDF forms locally." Does this mean that we just need version 8 or 9 and then people can save the form? What in version 7 is causing us not to be able to save? Did that change the technology in some way? I'm trying to figure out if we get IT to upgrade users to Reader 9 if this will solve the issue or will they have to install Acrobat Standard/Pro 9 to save a PDF form?
What other selling points could we make to our IT department that using Reader 9 is a lot better than using Reader 7? Any technology benefits, security or functions?
Thanks

~graffiti wrote:
No version of Reader can save a filled in form unless it has been enabled first.
To enable, open the file in Acrobat then go to Advanced>Enable usage rights in Adobe Reader...
And for my standard disclaimer, if you are going to use the forms in a corporate environment, be sure to study and understand the usage limits for enabled forms (the limit is 500 uses, but there are caveats to that) in the EULA. Mostly the enabled forms are meant for very small time users. If you do not meet that requirement, Adobe sells another product that can enable files for unlimited uses but it costs in the tens of thousands of dollars and is a server side solution.
Hey Graffii,
I enabled the usage rights and that did help with saving in Reader 7. I am a little concerned about the limit of 500 uses. Let me try and understand you a little better. I have a PDF that has a couple form fields and you're saying that the PDF can only be opened 500 times? I've never heard of restrictions on PDFs before. Does this happen after you place just 1 form field? How do I find out more information? I looked in the EULA, but found nothing.
Also, what does Adobe mean here "Enable users of Adobe Reader® (version 8 or later) to fill in and save PDF forms locally." Are they saying that you need Reader 8 or later to read a form or that you need Acrobat Pro 8 or later to enable the form feature?
It's all very confusing because one of the features they tout in version 9 is the ability to save forms locally, but once I enable the form I could save it with Reader 7. It's hard to tell if they are referring to Reader 9 or Acrobat Pro 9.
Thanks

SCC with different LabVIEW versions

Hi. I have many different projects, and some of them are in older versions of LabVIEW. I was wondering if there is support and what kind of support there is for older versions in the SCC tools of LabVIEW 6.1

We don't offer any cross versions tools for the source code control because VIs are generally saved in the LabVIEW version in which they were edited. If you want to use SCC with a project in an older version of LabVIEW, we recommend checking the files out of the master directory into the local, opening the VIs from the old local with LabVIEW 6.1, saving, and putting the VIs in a new project with the 6.1 SCC. This way you leave the old master directory intact for backup purposes.
Jeremy Braden
National Instruments

Still confused with different ABAP versions

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for