STMS , logs? for transports from DEV 200 to QAS 200, 201 & 202

We are transport from DEV client 200 to QAS client 200, 201 and 202 using stms and specifying which client we want the transport to go to.
After the transports, how can the development team find the logs for these transports.
Right now, we as basis can see the results after each of the transports to each client. IF there is an error then we stop and ask the dev. team to review the logs. However IF the transports go thru without error, HOW can we go back over time to confirm that there were in fact NO errors for transport to each client?
Thanks
Maria

Hello Maria
After you import the transport,in the STMS menu only you can see the option for checking import logs
just click on that and you will be able to see the import logs of a transport.If you drill the logs,you can see everything what the transports has done,what objects have been moved,also if there are any warnings or errors
Rohit

Similar Messages

Can not transport from DEV to PRD (Hang up)

Hi Experts,
Please help.. I have this problem, was not able to transport from Dev to Prod, it just hang up.. I've read a lot in web how to solve this problem and did the following:
   ==> Stop all TP running in OS level
   ==> Delete all pending job in Import Monitor (with truck logo)
   ==> and the last to be done is to delete the data from table TRBAT, but it took so long to delete the data in that table.. What I've noticed is that the data left in table TRBAT is the transport number wherein user was log-off during transport execution (as in the middle of the process)..
What should be the solution of this problem, as we can not proceed with the transport of our changes made in DEV system, as it just hang up in there.. and I'm also having this problem in deleteing data from TRBAT table.
Thanks.
Edited by: Deo Pasion on Feb 20, 2010 7:25 AM

Hi,
Its well known problem which is discussed many times in many threads.
Did you check TP System Log and TMS Alert of the System ?
Execute RSTPTEST report to check the STMS configuration. Also check the existence/status of RDDIMPDP Background Job.
Please refer these useful threads with similar symptoms.
[Transport (STMS) issue + Hang|Transport (STMS) issue + Hang]
[regarding STMS_IMPORT Transport Hang.|regarding STMS_IMPORT Transport Hang.]
Also check this SAP Note 71353 - Transports hang during background steps.
Regards
Bhavik G. Shroff

Problems when transporting from DEV to PROD

Hi experts, I have problem during transport from DEV to Production.
We have a DEV, QAS and PRODUCTION and we have transport from DEV to QAS very well. But when we transport from DEV to PROD, recibe an error like:
After beginning the import method RS_IOBC_AFTER_IMPORT for Objects types IOBC mode (activation)
Failed to verify catalog InfoObjetos ZCM_UNIMET_CHA01
The InfoObjeto ZCM_RENC version does not exist in active
The InfoObjeto ZCM_RENM version does not exist in active
1.The Query is: Wy if the transport go OK from DE to QAS, then The transport from DEV to PROD terminated in error?.
2. There are any items to check in production before to transport?.
PD: All of the Objects in DEV are in ACTIVE status
Tanks,
Ramon Sulvaran

The transport ended in QAS with error code (4) and ended in Producion with error code (8), the detal of the error in Production begin with:
Home After import RS_ODSO_AFTER_IMPORT method for type (s) ODSO object (trigger mode)
Activation of DataStore objects of type Object
Check DataStore objects of type Object
DataStore Object Verification ZCM_DS01
The DataStore object is consistent ZCM_DS01
Burning the DataStore objects of type Object
Internal activation (DataStore Object)
Pretreatment / Creating DDIC objects to DataStore Object ZCM_DS01
Table / View / BIC/AZCM_DS0100 (type 0) DataStore object recorded ZCM_DS01
Create / Delete the indexes for the active table
Table / View / BIC/AZCM_DS0140 (type 4) recorded ZCM_DS01 DataStore object
Type of table / BIC/WAZCM_DS0100 recorded
Table / View / BIC/VZCM_DS012 (type VIEW) recorded ZCM_DS01 DataStore object
Log ZCM_DS01 DataStore object changes was recorded successfully
Writing Object Catalog entries (Tadiran)
He has written the object TABL / BIC/AZCM_DS0100 in catálgo objects (Tadiran)
He has written the object TABL / BIC/AZCM_DS0140 in catálgo objects (Tadiran)
He has written the object TABL / BIC/VZCM_DS012 in catálgo objects (Tadiran)
He has written the object TTYP / BIC/WAZCM_DS0100 in catálgo objects (Tadiran)
Activate all ABAP Dictionary objects (5):
Error / Warning in progr.activación Dict., Detailed log> Detail
Activate table / BIC/AZCM_DS0100.
Lack of expansion to the category table
Lack of extension category for include or subtype .......
When i go to BW Production to check teh object. I see tha the Object was create but in inactive status (grey color). When y Try to Actiavate it y see the error: Error/ Warning in program Activation Dcit. Detailed Log -> Detail

Transporting from DEV server to Production Server

Dear Experts,
Like in ABAP and other SAP modules we are having Transport Requests to transport from Dev server to Production server In XI how can we transport all the configuration done by me from Dev server to Production server.

Hi,
In XI we can transport in two ways :
1) File Transport
2) Using CMS which needs configuration to be done
Using the File Transport you can easily the Export the Objects and Import the Objects in the Target system.
Select the Object in the Design or Configuration ->right Click you will find Export option.
When you select the It creates the .tpz file which can be imported in the Target System
Using file transfer or CMS we transport xi objects.
Transporting XI from DEV to QA
Look into this blog for how to export / improt IR and ID objects,
XI Software Logistics II: Overview
XI Software Logistics 1: SLD Preparation
Transporting IR,ID Objects using File System
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/93/a3a74046033913e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/a8/5e56006c17e748a68bb3843ed5aab8/frameset.htm
Regards
Ganga

Transporting from DEV to QA

We have 3 different sld's for DEV,QA,and PRD systems.
i need to transport my XI objects from DEV to QA.i'm working on standard XI contents.
i need answers for my following questions.
1.if i use full export for transporting SLD from DEV to QA,can i use the same tecnical systems and business systems in QA?
Can T.S and B.S also get transported from DEV to QA?
2.In such case how to define business systems groups and transport targets?
pls don't send any blogs..i've all the blogs
thanks
Abhijit

Hi,
1.if i use full export for transporting SLD from DEV to QA,can i use the same tecnical systems and business systems in QA?
Can T.S and B.S also get transported from DEV to QA?
You can use same technical systems and Business systems.
1. Go to Dev SLD and Export all your SWCV, Products, Technical and Business Systems. This is nothing but saving of the SLD objects as a CIM file on your local machine. You would also need to export the Technical And Business System poitning to your XI integration server .
2. Go to the QA SLD and then import these objects exported in Step 1 in QA SLD
3. Now, create the QA Tech and Business Systems in the QA SLD
4. Go to the Dev Business systems imported on the QS SLD and you will have an option Transport Targets. In this map the Source Business System to the Target Business Systems.
Make sure that all Dev Business Systems have the correspodning Transport Targets for the QA Business SYstems
5. Now if you import the ID objects in QA , the business systems name will be renamed automatically.
2.In such case how to define business systems groups and transport targets?
You need to create Transport Groups on your QA SLD. One for Dev and One for QA. You can create Transport Groups only for Integration Server Business Systems.
And this is why you would need to export the Dev XI technical System and Business System from the SLD of Dev and Import it into the QA SLD.
2. Create the transport groups and then assign all Dev Business Systems to Dev Group, all QA Business Systems to QA group and then create the transport targets.
You use the Option related Integration server in the Business Systems to assign a Business System to a Group.
Refer
Problem regarding xi transport
Thanks
Swarup
Edited by: Swarup Sawant on Feb 26, 2008 11:55 AM

Notification about errors during transport from DEV to QAS server.

Hi Guys.
Is there any way of alerting the user about the errors that arise when moving the transaction from DEV client to QAS client?
For Instance,In DEV the program may be working fine and while transporting sometimes errors can arise by not including all the necessary files while moving to QAS server.
Kind of auto-email facility notifying the user...

Hi,
there might be some standard functionality for TMS but if you can't find anything then you can still use BADI CTS_IMPORT_FEEDBACK. The only method if this BADI is called right after import of each transport.
Cheers

Handle metadata of configuration objects when transported from DEV to QA?

All,
I was reading this blog /people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/11/02/overview-of-transition-from-dev-to-qa-in-xi
<i>"Unlike IR when we import the scenarios in ID the configuration metadata will be lost and have to be manually entered in the QA ID. For Ex: Parameters like source directory, filename scheme, FTP server will vanish and have to be entered appropriately as required for QA sand box. After entering the metadata we need to activate all the scenario objects in the ID. After successful activation your interfaces are ready for testing."</i>
From the above I understand there are somethings(like adapter metadata..) that has to be entered manually when the objects are transported from dev to QA.
So my question is, for what all objects of ID needs metadata to be entered manually in QA.
Party?
Business systems(business systems, bus servcies, integration process)?
Communication channels?
Receiver determination?
Interface Determination?
Sender Agreement?
Receiver Agreement?
I appreciate your reply
Thanks
KK

Hi,
first of all it's not adapter's metadata
(adapter's metadata is something completely different)
the "thing" that will dissapear is the adapters'
configuration (configuration of your communication channels) - that's all
RFC destination (idoc adapter) ftp server (file adapter) etc.
basically all you need to do
is to fill it one every system (QAT, PRD etc.)
Regards,
michal

Transports from Dev System to Quality System, Objects copied in Local reque

Hi All,
I am doing transports from Dev Box to Quality Box, while collecting the objects , some required objects got collected in a local request(9xxxxxx) and some got collected in Work bench request(9yyyyyy), Now I want to add , the objects collected in the local request to the work bench request to have a single work bench request i.e 9yyyyyy for transport , with all the objects of the local request 9xxxxxx and already collected objects in work bench request 9yyyyyy,
Please provide the solution for the situation
Thanks in advance
suitable answers will be awarded
Prasad

Hi,
1.First see that your workbench request has a different target system than the ones pointed to by the development class/package of the objects you are trying to assign.
or,
The objects are not assigned to correct development class/package.
2. When we try to create a workbench request, we will see only the request and that is fine.
3.Now, release the local request containing your objects.
4.Include the local transport objects to the new workbench request (Ctrl + F11).
and release and transport the workbench request.
Pls assaign the points if it is useful.
Regards,
Raghavendra Rao.Kolli.

Query transport from dev to qlty giving transport error

Hello Xperts,
I am facing a problem while transporting a query from dev to qlty. below is the error i am facing...
Start of the after-import method RS_ELEM_AFTER_IMPORT for object type(s) ELEM (Activation Mode)
Element 4620F4R3R2BI818DARVFRP91N was copied from 'modified' to 'active'
Error when activating element 48V2NGDS1SU2F6PRD2V40SG7F
Element 9QXVN0Q42LJRX27HIKCWF1UAO is missing in version M
Element 48ZV1IROPVLXOOLRS0C49D1CB was copied from 'modified' to 'active'
Start of the after-import method RS_ELEM_AFTER_IMPORT for object type(s) ELEM (Delete Mode)
Errors occurred during post-handling RS_AFTER_IMPORT for ELEM L
The errors affect the following components:
   BW-WHM (Warehouse Management)
Post-import methods of change/transport request BD1K903806 completed
     Start of subsequent processing ... 20080417160233
     End of subsequent processing... 20080417160244
please let me know your comments for the same. I would be assigning good points if some one can advice me on this problem
regards
rohit

Hi,
one query elements is missing in your transport order :
Element 9QXVN0Q42LJRX27HIKCWF1UAO
so it can not activate element
48V2NGDS1SU2F6PRD2V40SG7F
Regards
Cyril

Transport from DEV to PROD BPC 7.5

Hi
i had a question of transporting AppSets from DEV to PROD System.
On the PROD Systems are no AppSets the PROD System is completly new.
Is it possible to transport the AppSets directly from the DEV to the PROD or must we first make a Backup in the DEV and an Restore in the PROD.
Thank you for your help.

Hi Carsten,
As far as i understand you need to transport application sets individually, from development to production. The object type ASET and APPM refer to an application set and application respectively.
As mentioned above, you can check and confirm from SAP Support if the back up mode ia now available to users.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Poonam

AIA FP 11.1.1.3 - Deployment Plan Generation for migrating from Dev to Test

Hi All,
Can you please validate the following from a Deployment from Dev to Test perspective. We have almost completed the development for an interface using AIA 11g, and are in the process of moving the interface from one instnace to another, and any help is highly appreciated.
Let us the take Purchase Order Integration between a legacy application and Oracle Purchasing, File Adapter-> Requester ABCS -> EBS -> Provider ABCS -> DB Adapter, which is a classical flow.
1. The Functional person defines a project in the Project Life Cycle Workbench
2. Functional decomposition done through Purchase Prder Business Task, and Service Solution components for each composite in the classical flow
3. The ABCSs are created by linking the corresponding Service Solution Components from the LCW using Service Contructor. These composite.xmls will have the annotation populated by the Service Constructor. It is okay for these composites to have concrete wsdls during development phase, but the concreate ones have to be replaced with abstract ones before geenrating deployment plans.
4. The EBS is not changed, it will have the annotations prepopulated, and there is no need to add any annoations to them
5. The File Adapter and DB Adapters (Transport Adapters?) have to be annotated based on the developer guide
6. The xsds and wsdl go into the mds based using the scripts provided. Any other common components can also be placed into MDS.
7. Once the development is done, Harvest the composites using the AIA Harvester.
8. After harvesting, from the AIA LCW, Generate the BOM. If we harvest all the 5 composites for the Business Task together, and do Generate BOM, does it capture all the composites? Or do they capture only the composites created using the Service Constructor? Or we have to add all the compistes manually to the Business Task?
9. Add Harvested Contents by Editing the BOM -> "Search and Add Existing Composite" option. We couldnt locate the "Add Harvested Composite" option while right clicking the Business Task.
10. Once all the harvested composites have been added to the BOM, export as XML
11. Using the BOM, generate the DeploymentPlan. The deployment plan will have references to the xsds and wsdls in the MDS
12. Using the Deployment Plan and AID, deploy the composites into a new instanec.
These are the questions I have,
1. Is the above understanding correct?
2. Since the MDS is in the Dev database, a pre-requisite for AID seems to be deployment of xsds and wsdls into the Test MDS schema. Can you please validate?
3. What happens to the bpels, xsls, mplans etc? How do they move from one instance to another?
Regards,
Anish

Hi Anish,
Following are the responses -
These are the questions I have,
1. Is the above understanding correct?
1. The Functional person defines a project in the Project Life Cycle Workbench - Yes
2. Functional decomposition done through Purchase Prder Business Task, and Service Solution components for each composite in the classical flow - Yes
3. The ABCSs are created by linking the corresponding Service Solution Components from the PLWB using Service Contructor. These composite.xmls will have the annotation populated by the Service Constructor. It is okay for these composites to have concrete wsdls during development phase, but the concreate ones have to be replaced with abstract ones before geenrating deployment plans.-Yes but location attribute in binding.ws section of composite.xml should always have concrete WSDL location.Use <replaceToken> in DeploymentPlan to replace the ip and port.
4. The EBS is not changed, it will have the annotations prepopulated, and there is no need to add any annoations to them - Yes
5. The File Adapter and DB Adapters (Transport Adapters?) have to be annotated based on the developer guide-Yes
6. The xsds and wsdl go into the mds based using the scripts provided. Any other common components can also be placed into MDS.- Yes
7. Once the development is done, Harvest the composites using the AIA Harvester.-Yes
8. After harvesting, from the AIA PLWB, Generate the BOM. If we harvest all the 5 composites for the Business Task together, and do Generate BOM, does it capture all the composites? Or do they capture only the composites created using the Service Constructor? Or we have to add all the compistes manually to the Business Task?-The 5 composites created by you should have a corresponding service solution component defined.When you define a service solution component in PLWB then a GUID is generated in the database table.You need to retrieve that value and manually enter in the annotation section of composite.xml except for ABCS.Then only the BOM will contain information on all the composites.
9. Add Harvested Contents by Editing the BOM -> "Search and Add Existing Composite" option. We couldnt locate the "Add Harvested Composite" option while right clicking the Business Task.*-Once you harvest it will be visible.*
10. Once all the harvested composites have been added to the BOM, export as XML - Yes
11. Using the BOM, generate the DeploymentPlan. The deployment plan will have references to the xsds and wsdls in the MDS - Yes
12. Using the Deployment Plan and AID, deploy the composites into a new instance.-Yes
2. Since the MDS is in the Dev database, a pre-requisite for AID seems to be deployment of xsds and wsdls into the Test MDS schema. Can you please validate?
Yes the 'UpdateMetaData' section under 'Configurations' in the DeploymentPlan will upload XSDs, WSDLs, DVM,Xrefs into MDS.
3. What happens to the bpels, xsls, mplans etc? How do they move from one instance to another?
The 'Deployments' section will deploy the project into server and write the information into MDS.
Rgds,
Mandrita

Backend AC std roles: Generate in each environment or transport from DEV?

Hi all,
After installing SAP GRC AC 5.3 application there are standard roles (/VIRSA/*) created in the backend without profile generation
Since such component has been installed in DEV, QA and PROD the different roles (without profiles) are also in the three environment.
Which is the right way to proceed?
1) Should we generate the profile for such roles in DEV and tranport them to QA and PROD?
2) Should we generate the profiles in each R/3 environments?
3) It does not matter to go for 1 or 2?
Many thanks in advance. Best regards,
Imanol

None of the above, if they are not assigned to users.
Best practice is to create a transport request for them and release it. Then delete them (no standard functionality for that anymore because it created problems, but check OSS for a solution "mass delete roles").
You can then import them again into a client if you really need to. Deleting them will be a performance gain for you from GRC perspective, and you should anyway not generally use the standard roles directly with profiles, but rather copies of them with their own.
Unfortunately there are exceptions to the rules and some standard roles have "personalization keys" for access to WDA applications. In SolMan you should not delete the standard roles without checking the installation guides first...
Cheers,
Julius

Ended with return code: === 8 === while doing transports from Dev to Test

Hi Experts,
We are doing transports from BD1 to BQ1 and getting this error message.
Could anyone please let me know why and what would be the solution for the following error message:
Execution of programs after import (XPRA)
Transport request   : BD1K900065
System              : BQ1
tp path             : tp
Version and release: 370.00.09 700
Execution of programs after import (XPRA)
End date and time : 20070803133308
Ended with return code: ===> 8 <===
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Chandu.

Raymonds,
There is huge list of errors coming up. Some of them are as below:
Navigation attribute 0SALESORG is missing in characteristic 0PLANT
Navigation attribute 0SALES_DIST is missing in characteristic 0PLANT
Characteristic 0RT_LOCATIO: Referenced characteristic 0PLANT not (actively) available
Attribute 0INT_CUST from characteristic 0SALESORG not (actively) available
Attribute 0CRM_MKTELM from characteristic 0UCCONTRACT not (actively) available
Attribute 0CRM_MKTELM from characteristic 0UCCONTRACT not (actively) available
Hierarchy characteristic 0BPARTNER of characteristic 0UCCONTRACT is not active
Characteristic 0UCOUTLCONT: Referenced characteristic 0UCCONTRACT not (actively) available
Characteristic 0UCOUTLCONT: Referenced characteristic 0UCCONTRACT not (actively) available
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
Chandu.

Aggregation level transportation from dev to quality

Hi,
I have 2 aggregation levels in my mutiprovider. How can I transport these 2 aggregation levels from dev to Quality systems?

Hi,
you can collect the aggregation levels in transport connection (transaction rsa1 --> transport connection). There is a folder "Planning" and a type "Aggregation Level" (technical name: ALVL). Just select your aggregation levels and add them to a request. Please be aware that depending objects such as the multiprovider have to be transported to your quality system at same time if they are not already existing over there.
Brgds,
Marcel

BEx Query objects transported from Dev to Prod Test do not overwrite

Hello,
I'm migrating BEx queries that were developed in a Dev instance and then packaged and imported into a prod test environment. The queries that already exist in qual are not overwritten with the changes, and the transport imports successfully. New queries import just fine and without issue. I'm not sure if this is a problem with how I am packaging the query for transport or some level of pre-work that is not being done in Prod test. Basis has confirmed that they are allowing re-writes when Importing.
Any suggestions?
Thanks.
Matt

Hi ,
Whenever we create a query in the System it generates reference ID's ( ELTUID,SELTUID,COMPUID etc) in backend.
For e.g.if you create a query in your quality system (Z_TEST) it will have a COMPUID generated for it (e.g ABCD).
Now when you create a query in Dev system (with the same technical name Z_TEST) a new COMPUID will get generated (e.g EFGH)
So when you transport Z_TEST to QUALTY ,it will create a new entry against COMPUID.thus having two instances of the same query.So best option would be to delete the old instance after transporting the new instance.
This wil solve your problem.
-Vikram Srivastava

STMS , logs? for transports from DEV 200 to QAS 200, 201 & 202

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for