STO Over & Under Receipts
In our project 75% of our STO Receipts happens though EDI using WMMBID02 idoc type. There are always lots of shortages and overages happening during the Goods Receipt of the STO.
Standard SAP does not allow over receipts to happen during Goods Receipt of a STO i.e. if 100 Cases was PGIed, system will not allow to receive 120 Cases at the time of GR.
Standard SAP puts shortages that occur during Goods receipt of a STO as In-transits i.e. if 100 Cases was PGIed, and 80 Cases was received at the time of GR it will put 20 Cases into In transit bucket.
What process was followed to handle such Over receipts and Under receipts during the Goods Receipt of a STO.
Hi There.
Normally you will have to receive the estimated amount (E.G. The original 100 on the STO) and then transfer the difference (or write-on and write-off) based upon the under/over delivery
Your finance team will need to look at the movements to see if any special accounting is required (Intra/Inter company)
Unfortunately there is not a clean method for this
Regards
Steve
Similar Messages
-
Dear Expert,
I am new to SAP MM and would like to getting some advises on the mentioned situation. For plant to plant transfer, I am going to use the STO. However, if the issued quantity is different from the actual received quantity. How should I handle it?
I have found that it's advised to first GR the issued quantity and then reverse the variance to the issuing plant. If not, there will have opened quantity in the STO and the STO can't be closed. However, how can I link up my reverse document with the original STO? I am expecting to use MvT 301 to transfer back the variance to the issuing plant but there is no place to mark the relationship to the original STO. Please help! Thanks in advance.the STO process is used to make your activities planable in advance, which is not possible with pure IM movements as they are executed only when the movement happens.
In general SAP does in the STO process not expect that something is lost in transit. (which actually is only the case in <1% of all differences that I ever analyzed in STO processes)
I actually do not really understand why one has to receive such exceptional cases with difference immediately in SAP. Since it is a process between plants (like brother and sister) it should be very easy to take the phone and call your partner to discuss what happened.
the shipping plant could cancel the goods issue and create a correct one in minutes and then you could do your receipt with right quantity.
This STO process is a real integrated process, which requires to talk to each other. Decisions should be made together, instead of working in silos and just posting the differences back to the other plant or leaving the difference alone in transit or scrapping it the receiving plant.
Especially the scrapping cares only about one part of the medal.
Example. if plant B shipped 100 but posted 200 as goods issue, and you receive 200 in plant A and scrap 100 in plant A, then you are fine in plant A. But plant B has still wrong inventory, because they never physically shipped what they posted in SAP. They may find it in the next physical count.
Movements like 551 that are created without reference cannot reference a STO. You may enter the PO number in a text field, but this is not really a reference for me.
Concentrate to do the process right, then you do not need to reference any difference posting. -
I am sure this topic has been taken up so many times before. I have browsed through almost all of them. I still do not have a way of restricting STO over delivery! Require your expertise!!.
My requirement is that STO over deliver should not occur when using VL10* transactions alone.
We tried to export a flag (say delv_flag)from program 'RVV50R10C' to shared buffer and import the same into BADI LE_SHP_DELIVERY_PROC (DELIVERY_FINAL_CHECK) to capture error message when STO over delivery is created. The entire logic is built based on this flag alone.We are deleting the flag in V50R_MAIN of the program 'RVV50R10C'.
There are some issues with this method:
1. In some cases the delete flag statement gets executed before importing from memory and hence an STO over delivery gets created. (I don't know how or why!).
2. When VL10* transaction is executed, the delivery flag is set. At this point in time, if the user tries to delete delivery without exiting the transaction, the BADI will get triggered and error message will be displayed. This is not correct functionality since error message should be displayed only for VL10* transactions.
Suggestion:
If I change the location of exporting the flag to include 'LV50R_VIEWF43' (form delivery_create), do you suppose it would work? Would Idocs trigger this?
If anybody has worked on similar requirement please share your inputs. Urgent!!!!
PS:
I have read about delivery tolerances too "The overdelivery tolerance functionality is available only for the deliveries created with reference to sales orders and not for deliveries created with reference for PO's or STO's".Dear Sapna Morey
I think OMCQ T.Code-- Select message M7--024 Change from Waring to error
Please try once with this it may work To control over delivery tolarency in STO
Dear Lakshmipathi G sir
i have one doubt please clear me sir please
To control Over delivery tolarance in sap standard is not available , then what is the use of the above one.
Because i have searched a lot , i didnt find the logic about this
Thanks a lot sir please help me sir
Thanks -
hi,
if i over to do goods receipt for purchase order, error message is displayed. how can i prevent this message to pop up again.
one method is to click unlimited delivery in purchase order. any other method so that i dont need to click it one by one in purchase order. thankshi Arif Mansuri
thanks a lot for answer my question.
yes, user request for that. As the vendor always over ship the material without any additional price. but there has another problem, let say PO qty is 1000 and goods receipt is 1200. In normal way, i should add one more item in PO 200 with indicator Free. so that the cost can be calculated correctly. however, it is very common to over goods receipt free of charge. any other methods to solve it -
Reporting Direct Production Cost Center Over/Under Absorption
Hi,
I am trying to find a way to report Manufacturing Cost Center Over/Under Absorption in a similar way COGS are reported in CO-PA. I mean - I would like to breakdown Direct Manufacturing Cost Center Over/Under Absorption into cost elements (just like COGS are broken down in COPA when invoice is posted).
I wonder if this is possible in SAP without Material Ledger implemented. If yes - can it be achieved by using a standard functionality or does it require an additional development?
Thank you,
KThanky you for your reply Ranjan,
My intention was to show Cost center over/underabsorption broken down by cost componets (activity Labour, Machine, Overhead). Currently it is shown as a balance on cost center. I would like to be able to recognize which part of Direct manufacturing CC balance refers to Labour, which to Machine and which to Overhead. Is it possible to achieve in sandard report or additional settings/development is required.
Regards,
Karol -
Hello
I am developing an Add-On which i use to send payments to an invoice, i would like to use the functionality of over under payment from SAP Business One.
When i pay to an invoice more than it should be (over payment), it works fine. But when we try to do it under, it doesnt work, it leaves the invoice open.
Which object should i use, the invoices.Summaplied??
Thanks
JacoboYeah,
For understanding that try tthe following...
1. Post a normal complete payment aganist an invoice.. then check the entries in the corresponding tables ( ORCT and child table)
2. Now post an underpaid invoice and check the tables and see the differenct the remainig amt will be posted to another acc or something... if u can get that field then u can do the same in SDK also..
I'm busy with other things or i would have did the above and tell u the filed.. just try the above...
But my guess is it could be *UnderOverpaymentdifference Property * check for the data of this field in both the situations.
Hope it helps,
Vasu Natari. -
For a customer I want to be able to handle over/under payments different depending on whether there is a small or large over or under payment. If there is a small difference, I want the difference to go to a seperate G/L account. If there is a large difference, I would like to have the difference posted as a residual. I have a EDI process that is filtering this data in and will always use a reason code with it. I have attached this reason code to a G/L account.
What I have experienced is that I through the process I can get the difference to post to the seperate G/L account - but it is posted there whether it is a small or large difference. I have tried to change tolerance amounts for both the company code group and the user group, but this does not seem to make a difference.
Is there a way anybody knows that I could have some sort of tolerance or restriction on the G/L account so only small amounts would be placed into the account and larger amounts would have a residual created?So how would I get the small differences to automatically clear to a seperate G/L account?
I still need the functionallity of automatically posting the small differences to the G/L account, but posting the larger differences to a residual. -
Pulling Over/Under delivery Tolerances from Customer Master into CMIR
Is it possible to pull the over/under delivery tolerance values from the customer master info the CMIR? I don't understand why the delivery priority flows from the cusotmer master to the CMIR but the Over/Under Tolerances do not. I've looked at SAPMV10A ... it looks like I might be able to use an enhancement spot to add the necessary logic but I've not used this type of user exit and I'm not sure if there is a better solution (like some configuration that I'm missing ???) Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks!
Hi Mallisa,
I tried creating a CMIR record and both Delivery Priority and Over/Under Delivery tolerance were copied in CMIR record from Customer Master.
BR,
Anshul Chohan -
What is Over Under Absorption means?
Hi guyz,
When I'm running Cost Center Actual/Plan/Variance Reporting, there is a field that is called Over/Under Absorption.
What does it mean by Over/Under Absorption?
Thanks guyzHi Meila,
It can be a surplus or deficit in actual costs compared to planned costs on the receiver side, but does not have to be.
Imagine your sending cost center is a grinding mill in a cement plant. It is planned to produce 100.000 t cement in the month, for what the mill would run 1000 h. The rate is 100u20AC /h. Therfore the planned absorption would be 100.000u20AC. In the end of the month it turns out that actually the Mill ran 1200 h and 120.000 t Cement were produced. Each of the daily cement production orders would show no unplanned costs, but the mill cost center would have an overabsorption of 20.000u20AC.
best regards, Udo -
I am trying to make a fraction in a form field and I would like it to have an over/under appearance. Is this possible?
What system and iPhoto version are you running? What theme are you using.
All of my calendars do have the month starting on Sunday, Don't know of any way to change it. Where are you located?
How do you have your Calendar application's preferences set to, Sunday or Monday start of week? -
HI, does anyone know how to make a over/under formula. I am making a home budget and when I was using Excel I had a Budgeted column, and a Actual column,then it had a column that would show me if i was at budget, over budget, or under budget and give the amount of the difference. Is that possible with numbers? I'm new to numbers and I never really used excel just the template that came with it.
I use Excel but I'm not sure what you are asking since I've never done exactly what you describe, apparently.
You seem to want it to include text in the cell. But do you really need that? I mean, if the deviation column is a negative number or positive number, wouldn't that be sufficient to tell you if you are over or under? Do you need to have it specifically include "over", etc?
I don't actually have Numbers so I can't tell you if what you want is possible or if there is a workaround to get the text you want. -
"line over/under text" from old Quark doc - how to get rid of them?
"line over/under text" from old Quark doc - how to get rid of them?
Can´t seem to finde this and deadline is coming for this project..
Thanks!
G.I actually found it by myself. But thanks for your response. Not having used my danish version of Quark for 5 years makes finding options i dont usually use in indesign kind of hard. I won´t ever miss danish quark.
-
Dear all,
I am writing a 3D program, the output from the video card separate the 3D image evenly into two half with a blank row when I choose to use over-under mode. However, it cause a problem. I contacted the company which make the 3D graphic display, they said it supposed to leave a blank row in between the top and bottom half of the image. My question is how can I do that setting? The explaination from the company is below
Thanks
Marco
"""An over-and-under stereoscopic image pair is created by first determining the number of visible pixel rows on the display screen. As an example 1024 row by 1280 pixels per row display mode with a refresh rate of 60 Hz..
Subtract roughly 10% of the active rows from the total visible rows. The left and right eye image will each consist of the full horizontal width of the screen and half of the remaining pixel rows.
This diagram of an unmodified display screen shows how the visible rows of pixels are utilized for the left and right eye images of an over-and-under stereoscopic image.
active rows (n): 1024
10% of active rows (0.1n): - 102
total active rows available for images (0.9n): 922
active rows for left eye image (0.9n/2): 461
active rows for left eye image (0.9n/2): 461"""Don't know if it's possible, but UI customization in Lr is very limited. When such questions come up, the stock answer is "look, it's the way it is for a reason..."
It could well be that if I had the option to move everything around to my heart's content, I'd eventually end up with the present layout because it's, well, the most efficient. But we'll never know, will we...
Backslash toggles before and after, if that's any help. -
Problems with over/under absorption on production cost centers - GBB AUI
Hi,
I have a problem with over/under absorption on production cost centers after month end closing.
We are using material ledger CKMLCP and actual activity rates from direct cost centers are settled directly to products using GBB AUI account determination.
Unfortunately from time to time there appears a significant balance on production cost centers after running CKMLCP. What might be the reason? I have analysed line items on cost centers but cannot find any answers.
We are using assignment of cost elements to particular activity types (function splitting), and I have checked that all cost elements are assigned to proper activity types.
Best regards,
KarolHi,
DP90 is used for Resource related billing, is broad term basically when you performing service that time you have to raise billing on the basis of resources which you had spend for perticular service
DP90 is run on the basis of DYNAMIC ITEM PROCESSOR,
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_di471/helpdata/en/59/54fc37004d0a1ee10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
I will tell you one process from the prspective of CS module
Create notification >> Create service order >> Confirm service order >> Resource releted billing (genrates sales document) >> Invoice to customer with refrance to sales document.
Now here DP90 is used to determine material,IN SALES DOCUMENT because CS module don't have billing feature as like SD Billing.
In CS module activities/Operation,but in SD module we speciefy material codes
So DIP determines XYZ activity/operation is ABC material in SD
kapil -
STO over receipts & IS-CWM 2.00
Standard SAP does not allow over receipts to happen during Goods Receipt of a STO
Does IS-CWM 2.00 allow over receipts to happen during Goods Receipt.Standard SAP does not allow over receipts to happen during Goods Receipt of a STO
Does IS-CWM 2.00 allow over receipts to happen during Goods Receipt.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi guys, I have a little problem, and I don't have a clue what is wrong. In DP when trying to load two materials from the selection into the table I get an error message saying that it can't be done because there are no plannable combinations of char
-
Bought a brand new iMac from a local Apple store 2 days ago. Unpacked it and started it up. Went through the whole startup process, created login account etc etc. I'm a web designer so first thing I did was go to adobe site to start trial download of
-
OBIEE users have full access unfort.
Hi guys, its my first query. I am a newbie. My company bought BIEE. I did the configurations and connected it our Active Directory. Problem is, everyone see everything in the forlders (analysis, dashboards etc...) I will create roles/policies and any
-
I need Best Practices foe LOgastics Invoice Verification Mesaage Output (Invoice . Credit Memo , SUB Credit & Debit)
-
Left Outer Joining multiple tables to one source table FAILS with VLD-1511
Hi all, Is it me, or is OWB unable to handle left outer joining 1 source table to multiple other tables? I want to load a fact table so I have 1 source table with measures. This table must be outer joined to some dimensions that have their FK in the