Strategy for CKD sales components

Hi Gurus:
            scenario describle as follow:
We have a product A which assebled by B1, B2 and B3. We do not sale product A directly, but sell set of components B1, B2 and B3.  We set a "sales BOM" for product A.
I would NOT to plan the components seperately, so my question is : how can I plan the procurement of B1, B2, B3 totally? What kind of strategy should be used for A? 
Thanks in advance!!!
BR
Kevin

Gurus, no comments?

Similar Messages

  • Release strategy for a Sales order

    Hi friends,
    Can somebody help me in setting the Release for a sales order.
    Thanks
    Isaac

    Hi,
    There is no any std Release procedure for sales order.
    If you want to configure relase procedure like Purchase order in MM for price then go through below link,
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/en/a4/af9e78e69611d2ace10000e8a5bd28/content.htm
    Kapil

  • Release strategy for Sales Order

    Hi all,
    Is it possible to assign release strategy to Sales Order document in SAP?
    Thanks
    SAP-MM.

    Please check this answered link:
    Re: Release strategy for a Sales order
    what is release strtegy for sales order
    Edited by: Afshad Irani on Jun 30, 2010 12:27 PM

  • Is it possible to have release strategy for sales order?

    Is it possible to have release strategy for sales order?

    hi
    as per SAP standard there can not be any release strategy for sales order but if u want to control u can use authorization profile for this purpose.
    povide authoriztion to the required persons only..
    regards
    CMM

  • Release Strategy for releasing in Sales Orders by Individual/Jointly

    Hi,
    Is there any release strategy of Customers by single/multiple persons for releasing Sales Orders? If yes give me the detailed configuration.
    Regards
    Sudhakar Taduvai

    Hi;
    In std. you do not have release strategy but you can use following option;
    Configure two schedule lines like CP- MRP relavant & BN- Not relavant to MRP.
    By default BN will appear & as release  user will change the schedule line.
    This way you use like release.
    Regards;
    Avinash

  • What is the use of Release Strategy for Sales Document

    Hi,
    Can i know what is the use of Release Strategy for Sales Document? Difference between lowest level and Highest level.

    Hi,
    Can i know what is the use of Release Strategy for Sales Document? Difference between lowest level and Highest level.
    Lowest Status No: Sale Document can have several statuses at the same time. However, only one of the statuses may have a status number. If another status with a status number is activated; the old status with status number is deactivated. This is only valid under certain conditions. The system makes a note of the status with the highest status number that has been reached up to the present. The "lowest number" of this status number determines which status number a new status must have.
    Highest Status No: Sales Document can have several statuses at the same time. However, only one of the statuses may have a status number. If another status with a status number is activated, the old status with a status number is deactivated, provided the new status number does not exceed the 'highest number' defined for the old status number
    If you want more clarity try to check below link
    http://www.sapfunctional.com/SD/ReleaseStrategy/Index.htm
    Regards,
    Prasanna

  • Valuation Strategy for Sales Order Costing

    We are currently using valuated sales order stock in ECC 6.0. The "without valuation strategy field" on the requirements class is not checked. However, the valuation strategy varies for a material and for a sales order. Sometimes it is using valuation strategy 2 - cost from the production order cost estimate - which is desired and other times valuation strategy 3 - cost from the standard price field in the material master - which is not desired. When is the valuation strategy determined for a production order for valuated sales order stock?

    Costing Variant is assigned to Requirement class
    Requirement class is assigned to Requirement type
    Requirement type is assigned to Planning Strategy
    Planning strategy is assigned to strategy groups
    Strategy group is assigned to MRP3 tab in Material Master
    System picks the costing sheet in requirement class
    In this way product will be costed for Make to Order sale order costing.
    Srinivas

  • Release Strategy for Sales Order-IMP

    Hi Gurus,
    I want to know regarding <b>Release Strategy for sales orders</b>. I want to know the detailed step-wise procedure for SO and not for PO. My understanding is that standard SAP does not support Release Strategy for SO in SD Module. Please l want the following queries to be answered
    1) Is my understanding on Release Strategy for SO correct as mentioned above?
    2) What are the other alternatives and the steps of configuration step-wise.?
    Kindly help me post this information as it is required urgently. Suitable full Reward Points will be given to all answers.
    Many Thanks,
    Pankaj Mishra
    E-Mail : [email protected]

    Pankaj,
    There is no release strategy for sales order.
    You can try it doing Authorisation /Status  profile with your BASIS person...
    REWARD IF U FINDS THIS AS USEFUL...
    Regds
    MM

  • Data conversion strategy for new SOB

    Dear Viewers
    on 11.5.10
    We are creating a new SOB with a change in currency from Feb-11 as this is the requirement
    For the same, we need to do data conversion.
    I have a confusion for Purchase Orders and Sales Orders
    Purchase Orders:
    Open purchase orders will be converted, means the unfulfilled PO`s i.e the ones not received and are fully open.
    The PO`s which have been recieved but not delivered, Requested the users to clear the intransit receipts.
    The PO's which are partially received, what to be done for them?
    If a PO is fully received and Delivered will not me converted to the new SOB as its not an open PO
    but If invoice comes after Feb-11, than how the matching will be done?
    What if a return has to be made moving forward in FEB-11 under new SOB
    Sales Orders:
    Open sales orders will be converted, that is the ones that have been entered and not yet booked.
    Users have been requested to clear off the Sales order lines which are already pick confirmed but not yet shipped, hence they will be shipped and interfaced to AR
    For the Sales orders that have been booked, those lines that are not yet processed further will also be converted.
    Now what if a receipt comes after feb 11, how to handle this as the sales order wiould not have been converted?
    Please give your advise on the data migration strategy for PO`s and SO's.
    Please do add any point that may have been missed by me
    Appreciate your help
    Thanks
    Emm

    Hi David,
    for master data conversion you can use LSMW and the RE-FX BAPIs. (please refer to SAP note  [782947|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/782947] ).
    Regards, Franz

  • MTO - how to prevent a second planned order for a sales order?

    Dear friends,
    We are working on Make to Order process (Planning strategy group 20).
    No Production/process order is used
    Shop floor uses a different system --> details from planned order is passed to the shop floor system; and finished product is delivered/posted into SAP Sales order stock - through interfaces
    No QM in place
    A typical day-to-day scenario –
    Sales order Qty = 100
    MRP Run à Planned order qty = 100
    Raw materials posted to ‘Sales order stock’
    Planned order is firmed
    For example if Produced qty = 90
    sales order stock of the finished product = 90
    Balance 10 cannot be produced / delivered for various reasons
    Planner posts the raw material to cost center / rejections / own stock etc., and ensures that the ‘sales order stock’ of the raw materials are zero.
    Planner deletes the planned order
    Next MRP run triggers a new planned order for the balance qty 10
    Now, the requirement is to prevent the new planned order getting generated for the balance quantity, during the subsequent MRP run (despite the shortage in the Sales order stock of the finished product).
    The following options have been evaluated –
    Once the final good receipt is done & before deleting the planned order,
    o       Change the Sales order quantity to match the total produced quantity
    o       (or) Change the schedule line category for the Sales order item from CP to CN
    §         Since the Sales order and planned order are handled by different teams, considering the frequency of correspondence/coordination needed between these two teams to get the sales order items corrected, this idea is not accepted
    §         Additional authorization for the planner to change the sales order item is not acceptable
    Include Under delivery / Unlimited tolerances
    o       at the customer (master) level
    o       (or) Sales order level…
    §         In this case, System seems to consider the tolerances only when the  delivery for the Sales order is posted; and not when the sales order stock is received within the tolerance limits;
    §         Considering the time gap between the GR and Delivery of the finished product, this option is not accepted
    Kindly suggest the other options / settings / processes, to meet this requirement
    Thank you for your time and efforts.
    With Best Regards,
    Senthil

    Closing this thread
    Thanks
    Senthil

  • What is your strategy for form validation when using MVC pattern?

    This is more of a general discussion topic and will not necessarily have a correct answer. I'm using some of the Flex validator components in order to do form validation, but it seems I'm always coming back to the same issue, which is that in the world of Flex, validation needs to be put in the view components since in order to show error messages you need to set the source property of the validator to an instance of a view component. This again in my case seems to lead to me duplicating the code for setting up my Validators into several views. But, in terms of the MVC pattern, I always thought that data validation should happen in the model, since whether or not a piece of data is valid might be depending on business rules, which again should be stored in the model. Also, this way you'd only need to write the validation rules once for all fields that contain the same type of information in your application.
    So my question is, what strategies do you use when validating data and using an MVC framework? Do you create all the validators in the views and just duplicate the validator if the exact same rules are needed in some other view, or do you store the validators in the model and somehow reference them from the views, changing the source properties as needed? Or do you use some completely different strategy for validating forms and showing error messages to the user?

    Thanks for your answer, JoshBeall. Just to clarify, you would basically create a subclass of e.g. TextInput and add the validation rules to that? Then you'd use your subclass when you need a textinput with validation?
    Anyway, I ended up building sort of my own validation framework. Because the other issue I had with the standard validation was that it relies on inheritance instead of composition. Say I needed a TextInput to both check that it doesn't contain an empty string or just space characters, is between 4 and 100 characters long, and follows a certain pattern (e.g. allows only alphanumerical characters). With the Flex built in validators I would have to create a subclass or my own validator in order to meet all the requirements and if at some point I need another configuration (say just a length and pattern restriction) I would have to create another subclass which duplicates most of the rules, or I would have to build a lot of flags and conditional statements into that one subclass. With the framework I created I can just string together different rules using composition, and the filter classes themselves can be kept very simple since they only need to handle a single condition (check the string length for instance). E.g. below is the rule for my username:
    library["user_name"] = new EmptyStringFilter( new StringLengthFilter(4,255, new RegExpFilter(/^[a-z0-9\-@\._]+$/i) ) );
    <code>library</code> is a Dictionary that contains all my validation rules, and which resides in the model in a ValidationManager class. The framework calls a method <code>validate</code> on the stored filter references which goes through all the filters, the first filter to fail returns an error message and the validation fails:
    (library["user_name"] as IValidationFilter).validate("testuser");
    I only need to setup the rule once for each property I want to validate, regardless where in the app the validation needs to happen. The biggest plus of course that I can be sure the same rules are applied every time I need to validate e.g. a username.
    The second part of the framework basically relies on Chris Callendar's great ErrorTipManager class and a custom subclass of spark.components.Panel (in my case it seemed like the reasonable place to put the code needed, although perhaps extending Form would be even better). ErrorTipManager allows you to force open a error tooltip on a target component easily. The subclass I've created basically allows me to just extend the class whenever I need a form and pass in an array of inputs that I want to validate in the creationComplete handler:
    validatableInputs = [{source:productName, validateAs:"product_name"},
                         {source:unitWeight, validateAs:"unit_weight", dataField:"value"},
                   {source:unitsPerBox, validateAs:"units_per_box", dataField:"value"},
                        {source:producer, validateAs:"producer"}];
    The final step is to add a focusOut handler on the inputs that I want to validate if I want the validation to happen right away. The handler just calls a validateForm method, which in turn iterates through each of the inputs in the validatableInputs array, passing a reference of the input to a suitable validation rule in the model (a reference to the model has been injected into the view for this).
    Having written this down I could probably improve the View side of things a bit, remove the dependency on the Panel component and make the API easier (have the framework wire up more of the boilerplate like adding listeners etc). But for now the code does what it needs to.

  • Best strategy for variable aggregate custom component in dataTable

    Hey group, I've got a question.
    I'd like to write a custom component to display a series of editable Things in a datatable, but the structure of each Thing will vary depending on what type of Thing it is. So, some Things will display radio button groups (with each radio button selecting a small set of additional input elements, so we have a vertical array radio buttons and beside each radio button, a small number of additional input elements), some will display text-entry fields, and so on.
    I'm wondering what the best strategy for tackling this sort of thing is. I'm sort of thinking I'll need to do something like dynamically add to the component tree in my custom component's encodeBegin(), and purge the extra (sub-) components in encodeEnd().
    Decoding will be a bit of a challenge, maybe.
    Or do I simply instantiate (via constructor calls, not createComponent()) the components I want and explicitly call their encode*() and decode() methods, without adding them to the view tree?
    To add to the fun of all this, I'm only just learning Faces (having gone through the Dudney book, Mastering JSF, and writing some simpler custom components) and I don't have experience with anything other than plain vanilla JSP. (No EJB, no Struts, no Tapestry, no spiffy VisualDevStudioWysiwyg++ [bah humbug, I'm an emacs user]). I'm using JSP 2.0, JSF 1.1_01, JBoss 4.0.1 and JDK 1.4.2. No, I won't upgrade to 1.5 (yet).
    Any hints, pointers to good sample code? I've looked at some of the sample code that came with the RI and I've tried to navigate the JSF Blueprints stuff, but I haven't really found anything on aggregating components into a custom component. Did I miss something obvious?
    If this isn't a good question, please let me know how I can sharpen it up a bit.
    Thanks.
    John.

    Hi,
    We're doing something very similar. I had a look at the Tomahawk Date component, and it seems to dynamically created InputText components in the encodeEnd(). However, it doesn't decode this directly (it only expects a single textual value). I expect you may have to check the request yourself in decode().
    Other ideas would be appreciated, though - I'm still new to JSF.

  • Purchase Requisition for Order BOM components ?

    Dear Members :
    Can I generate purchase requisition for Order BOM components from VA01 ? Mine is TAQ - the header itm cat and TAE for sub-items (finished prod) . While navigating within Sales Order and branching to a particular component's shced. line - the pruch req col is blank. The schedule line cat for the sub-item is CT.
    Could someone please explain the configuration steps I need to maintain for the above ? What I am expecting is when I save the Sales Order it should create Purch Req for the components which do not have enough stock.
    Thanks
    Atanu

    Hi :
    Thanks for your advice. Couple of things :
    1. In my system in auto acc assignment, I already have consumption acc under posting key GBB. Now I am getting error in VA01 - which states that "The system was not able to determn a consumption acc for purchase order item with acc assignment" and also suggesting to address "GBB posting key". I made the following changes for CT :
        movt : 101
        order type : NB
        item cat : 0
        acc assignment cat : F/C
    2. Obviously SAP is expecting a consumption GL acc, which though is there under GBB-AUF from my existing setup. For generating purch req this is strange becoz I haven't yet gone upto PO generation step nor released the supposed to be Purch Req.  for BOM component - and this is before I save the Sales Order .
    3. In spro->acc grouping for mov type; I don't see the following combination in SAP  ie,
    101(MvT) - B (MvT) - GBB (TEKey) - AUF. I need B instead of F which is already there and is for production order but the BOM comp has to be for PO but the combination is not there.
    Do you think this could be the reason that SAP couldn't find the GL acc ?
    4. Also my purpose was not just to raise a purch req every time the sales order is created for the BOM components - only if there is shortage in stock - but then again for CT once I assign the above, it doesn't allow to check the boxes like Availbility , Requrmnt etc. (??)
    Am I clear and could you please suggest me what I am missing or doing wrong ? What movement type do you siggest to enter in CT fields.
    Thanks so much for your time.
    Atanu

  • Anyone have a Snow Leopard Upgrade strategy for their Audio Production...

    Hi All. I have arrived at a place where I need to do a fresh OS install. I am thinking it is a good time to upgrade to SL. Like many people I not only have GarageBand (my main DAW) but a range of free and paid 3rd party apps, Jam Packs, DL'd loops, Drivers and a library of projects (mostly unfinished hehe..). What is the current wisdom or strategy for people in this situation to make this kind of transition and not break anything? Thanks.

    If you choose to do a completely fresh install (including re-installing all software programs), GB's critical components are:
    • the Loop Library (HD/Library/Audio/Apple Loops)
    • the Instrument Library (HD/Library/Application Support/GarageBand/Instrument
    • Midi Drivers, Midi Devices, Plug-Ins (all under their names in HD/Library/Audio)
    For all these folders, there's a corresponding one in your User Library. Stuff goes there if you have checked that it is only available for the current user when you installed/saved it.

  • How to avoid special stock indicator for intercompany sales transitions.

    Hi Friends
    I have an issue Intercompany sales .if I  enter intercompany plant(Delivering plant) in the sales order system is taking special stock indicator and looking for sales order stock.
    If I enter company code plant for sales from unrestricted stock, system is not taking special stock indicator.
    Please advice how to avoid special stock indicator for intercompany sales transitions.
    Thanks in advance.
    SRK

    Ravi,
    Special stock is generally determined by the MRP strategy group in the material master of the plant against which you place your order.  The strateg(ies) contained in the strategy group will determine the SO requirements type, which will in turn determine whether or not the order is 'account assigned' (special stock).  
    It is normal to only have one strategy contained in a strategy group.  However (and I seldom recommend this) SAP will support multiple strategies within one strategy group.  In this case, you could have both MTS and MTO orders against the same plant/material, by manually altering the requirements type in the sales order.  This scenario is usually difficult for a planner, and involves additional manual attention to make everything work.
    I suggest that your first avenue is to change the Strategy group in the material master of the delivering plant to one that supports MTS.  This has a big impact in Controlling and in Production Planning, so ensure that all affected functional groups are aware of what you are doing, and of the resulting changes that they will experience.  The transition from MTO to MTS must be carefully controlled.
    If you are not a PP expert, I suggest you consult with your local PP expert before embarking on this change.
    Best Regards,
    DB49

Maybe you are looking for