Structure compatibiliyt issue.

I created a BAPI and as a part of it i declared a table veh_data like a structure.
Also i created a method in se24 having a table tb_data in import parameter which was of Table type of the above structure.
Now, in the BAPI when i called this method and passed veh_data to tb_vehi_data. It is giving error that they are not compatible.
What can be done regarding this..?

Similar Messages

Does moving sites using Content and Structure cause issues in SQL content db's?

I would like to be able to use "manage content and structure" to move sub-sites within a site collection (SharePoint 2010). For example I have a site that is right under my top level site and I would like to move it to be the child site of one of
its' current peers.
There is some concern from admins that this creates a mess in the content DB, therefore all moves should be done using powershell export/import.
Can anyone tell me, technically, what happens when we use the move command in "content and structure" within a site collection and if there are known issues with it?

It doesnot hamper Content DB, all changes are made within the Site Collection Content Database.
using Manage content and structure has benefits, like UI based content restructuring, no support required from Farm Admin. However if you feel to use PowerShell you could still go for it.
Enable developer dashboard, to see what happens in the backgroud while using Manage Content and Structure.
Hope this helps!
Ram - SharePoint Architect
Blog - SharePointDeveloper.in
Please vote or mark your question answered, if my reply helps you

Cost Component Structure (OKTZ) Issue - Max number of cost fields reached

Hello.
I'm having this issue in OKTZ when adding new cost component in an exisiting cost component structure. it says "maximum number of cost fields reached (40)".
not sure what to do with this.
please see screenshot
http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/1700/oktz.jpg

Hi Andrew,
When yo create the Cost Components in the Cost Component Structure, inside each Cost Component, there will be properties relating to whether the Cost in that Cost Component is Fixed / Variable, relevant to Inventory Valuation or not etc.
To view these options...Go to OKTZ, select the line of your Cost Component Structure, double click on "Cost Component with Attributes" in the left side navigation. Now, you will be able to see the list Cost Components on right hand side. If you double click on any Cost Component, you will see the properties of that Cost Component.
There, you can see ther radio buttons "Variable Costs" and "Fixed and Variable Costs".
Now, in Standard SAP, you will be able to create a maximum 40 Cost Components. The behaviour of the system goes like this.... If one Cost Component is only "Variable Cost", it will take the space of one Cost Component out of the maximum 40. If one Cost Component is of "Fixed and Variable Costs", then it will take the space of two Cost Components out of the maximum 40. That means, if all of your Cost Components are "Fixed and Variable", then you will be able to create only 20 Cost Components.
You can find the SAP explanation regarding this in the IMG Documentation...
SPROControllingProduct Cost ControllingProduct Cost PlanningBasic Settings for Material Costing--Define Cost Component Structure. Check the IMG Documentation there to find the following text...
Structure of the Cost Components in a Cost Component Split
The cost components are listed in a cost component structure that can contain up to 40 cost components (cost fields).
You can create up to 40 cost components that contain variable costs.
For cost components that contain full costs, the system creates a second cost field for the fixed costs. This means that you can create no more than 20 cost components that are full costs.
Revert back for further explanation...
Srikanth Munnaluri

Sender File adapter complex structure FCC issue - flat structure RFC-stuck

Hi,
Please help.
I have a the below file structres-
Option 1-
H,100890,P100,A02,S101,AUD#
I,P,NULL,TH,Test PO TH,1,EA,100,10160000,A002,0001,720090,E.1.4.3,,,,VT#
I,P,NULL,TH,Test PO TH1 2,2,EA,100,10160000,A002,0001,720090,E.1.4.3,,,,VT#
H,100899,P100,A02,S101,GBP#
I,P,NULL,AS,Test PO AS1,1,EA,100,10160000,A002,0001,720090,E.1.4.2,,,,VT#
I,P,NULL,AS,Test PO AS12,2,EA,100,10160000,A002,0001,720090,E.1.4.2,,,,VT#
I need to map this into a Z RFC which is expecting all the data in one row - of course multiple rows
Option 2-
Same structure as above but all in same row-
H,100890,P100,A02,S101,AUD,P,NULL,TH,Test PO TH,1,EA,100,10160000,A002,0001,720090,E.1.4.3,,,,VT#
I,100890,P100,A02,S101,AUD,P,NULL,TH,Test PO TH,1,EA,100,10160000,A002,0001,720090,E.1.4.3,,,,VT#
I,100890,P100,A02,S101,AUD,P,NULL,TH,Test PO TH1 2,2,EA,100,10160000,A002,0001,720090,E.1.4.3,,,,VT#
H,100899,P100,A02,S101,GBP,P,NULL,AS,Test PO AS1,1,EA,100,10160000,A002,0001,720090,E.1.4.2,,,,VT#
I,100899,P100,A02,S101,GBP,P,NULL,AS,Test PO AS1,1,EA,100,10160000,A002,0001,720090,E.1.4.2,,,,VT#
I,100899,P100,A02,S101,GBP,P,NULL,AS,Test PO AS12,2,EA,100,10160000,A002,0001,720090,E.1.4.2,,,,VT
This also needs to be mapped into a Z RFC which is expecting all the data in one row - of course multiple rows
I am getting issues in getting the file data across to Receiver adapter.
I have tried various combinations but the message is failing in SXMB_MONI.
How do i do it as i need to get the finalised option for incoming file structure?
Option 1 is being stressed but how do i map it if i cannot get the receiver structure in RFC.
Please help as I am stuck now.
Regards,
Archana

Hi,
The problem is basically in message mapping from file to RFC external message.
The option 2 is working now and I get correct converted file strcuture after FCC and into RFC and also a correct RFC payload.
However, business is stressing that can send the file in the format as given in Option 1 where u have different structure - Header and Items. This is not coming out correct in RFC payload as the header has 5 fields as compared to more in item but the header and item are still being mapped to the flat RFC structure and this is creating a mismatch. The item line is missing the 5 fields from Header.
How do i do the FCC in this situation to get the correct structure in RFC?
This means that in RFC payload, the first line should be the one as below-
H,100890,P100,A02,S101,AUD#
The 2 records after this as received in RFC internal table should be as 2 given below-
I,P,NULL,TH,Test PO TH,1,EA,100,10160000,A002,0001,720090,E.1.4.3,,,,VT#
I,P,NULL,TH,Test PO TH1 2,2,EA,100,10160000,A002,0001,720090,E.1.4.3,,,,VT#
However, the 2 structures contain variable field columns.
Please help.
Regards,
Archana

SWCONT and SWR_CONT, different structure causing issue!

Hi experts,
I am having a issue with my design, while trying to trigger a workflow from a program. I am calling the workflow directly using 'SAP_WAPI_START_WORKFLOW' in a FM.
The problem is that few tables need to be passed for the SO header and item data. The container table type created using FM 'SWC_ELEMENT_SET' is 'SWCONT' and the WF WAPI expects it to be 'SWR_CONT'. Structures are different and even passing the table data in itab type from SWCONT to SWR_CONT using MOVE_CORRESPONDING does not help.
I do not think that creating classes and events would help as the data structure to be passed to WF remains the same.
regards
VJ

Hi SNJY,
Thanks for your response.
Now, imagine hard-coding for all the SO data record won't tht be fun... lol
i am using 'SWC_ELEMENT_SET'
    PERFORM set_container
                          TABLES
                                t_event_container
                          USING 'Header_Info'
                                wa_order_header_in.
to take in a itab and populate the container table with data, as shown below:
       ELEMENT TAB_INDEX ELEMLENGTH TYPE VALUE
     HEADER_INFO     000000     116     u     BAPISDHD1
     HEADER_INFO     000001     010     C
     HEADER_INFO     000002     070     C
     HEADER_INFO     000003     010     C
     HEADER_INFO     000004     004     C     OR
     HEADER_INFO     000005     010     C
     HEADER_INFO     000006     004     C     0001
     HEADER_INFO     000007     002     C     00
     HEADER_INFO     000008     002     C     01
     HEADER_INFO     000009     003     C     001
     HEADER_INFO     000010     004     C
     HEADER_INFO     000011     008     D     00000000
     HEADER_INFO     000012     001     C
     HEADER_INFO     000013     008     D     00000000
     HEADER_INFO     000014     004     C
     HEADER_INFO     000015     004     C
where as the 'SAP_WAPI_START_WORKFLOW' expects the input_container to have
'ELEMENT' 'VALUE' structure...
Now, if we look at the output from SWC_ELEMENT_SET it has 'HEADER_INFO' for ELEMENT not the actual field names of the structures. so the move-corresponding also doesnot help.
i hope this puts the situation more clearly.
rgds
VJ

Plz help me structure incompatible issue.

Hi all ,
while doing upgrade from 4.6c to ecc 6.0 i am gettig this error
"I_COSS" cannot be converted to the line incompatible. The line type
must have the same structure layout as "I_COSS" regardless of the
length of a Unicode . Unicode character. Unicode character.
and this error is coming in this line of code
PERFORM accepted TABLES i_coss USING zcoss quantity hour.
PERFORM accepted TABLES i_cosp USING zcosp quantity hour.
FYI:
these two perform calling a single form
FORM accepted TABLES w_table STRUCTURE i_cosp USING char6 char3 typ.
also
DATA: i_coss TYPE coss OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: i_cosp TYPE cosp OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
please help me in resolving this issue
thanks in advance .

Hello Anit
Table COSP has 161 fields and table COSS 145 fields, most of which are common to both tables.
The TABLES parameter is of (line) type COSP. In order to get around the Unicode error you have to move the data from I_COSS to an itab having line type COSP:
DATA:
lt_cosp_tmp   TYPE cosp OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
LOOP AT i_coss INTO ls_coss.
    clear: ls_cosp.
    MOVE-CORRESPONDING ls_coss TO ls_cosp.
   APPEND ls_cosp TO lt_cosp_tmp.
ENDLOOP.
" PERFORM accepted TABLES i_coss USING zcoss quantity hour. " Replace by:
PERFORM accepted TABLES lt_cosp_tmp USING zcosp quantity hour.
PERFORM accepted TABLES i_cosp USING zcosp quantity hour.
However, it is up to you to find out whether this coding is semantically correct.
Regards
Uwe

Structural Authorizations Issue

Dear all,
We are involved in a HCM OM project and we have an issue with the Structural Authorizations.
We have more than one user who must acces to the same Organizational Unit. This is suppose to be easy because we assign this object code to an user profile (T77pr)
The problem is that, the users doesn't have to have acces to the same objects which belongs to this Org Unit. (Objects positions in example).
I.E.
User 1 acces Org Unit 1
User 2 acces Org Unit 1
User 1 create Positions in Org Unit 1
User 2 create positions in Org Unit 1
User 1 cannot acces to positions created by user 2.
Any idea? how can we restrict this access?
Thanks in advance,
L.

let me take a shot at this by drawing an analogy with a std sap scenario in hcm.
my-scenario-1:
1. position to position relationship is maintained for the sake of line managers A/B-002 relationship to be specific & in the absence of chiefs because in an org unit there are 3 line managers with 10 people reporting to each of them
2. this means
manager-1 has 10 people reporting to him/her
manager 2 - has 10 other people
manager-3 has 10 other people.
3. the above means manager-1 cannot view people reporting to manager-2 and 3 respectively,.. and extrapolates this to each manager.
4. how do you handle this via str.auths in sap std?
now compare the above to your scenario:
1. I would create a z-relationship for each user and restrict access based on that using a functional module in the structural profile.
worth a shot .....not very complex if you ask me :-0
cheers

Structured navigation issues

I'm hoping someone knows what is going on here.
I'm trying to use structured navigation to display just a normal set of links, some of which should be in headings. I'm seeing very odd behaviour.
this is how it should look- and it does indeed look like this if you are on the site settings page.
However on the front page I see this instead.
I'm really not sure what's going on. I tried deleting all the css I've applied to the navigation elements and its still the same. I would have expected if it was CSS it would be consistently broken, but the fact it works on one page and not another is baffling.
I can't use managed metadata navigation because I need to target the link audience.

Hi Andrew,
As I understand, you encountered the issue with Global Navigation (Top link bar).
Please access Navigation settings page via
http://sitename/_layouts/15/AreaNavigationSettings.aspx , then check Structural Navigation: Editing and Sorting part, especially part under Glocal Navigation level. We configure top link bar there.
Please capture the screenshot of that part with expanding all levels.
Regards,
Rebecca Tu
TechNet Community Support

Drilldown vs Structure Element issue

Dear Gurus,
I have 2 free chars and several structure elements in my query along with 3 KFs. My req is like this.
KFs - KF1 KF2
Struc Elements - S1 S2 S3 whereas say S3 is nothing but a formula S1+S2.
Free Chars - FC1 FC2
Data in Cube:
FC1    FC2     KF1      KF2
A1       B1        1           1
A1       B2        1           1
A1       B3        1           1
A2       B4        1           1
A2       B5        1           1
A2       B6        1           1
When I execute te query its all fine. My report looks stg like this..
S1      3         3............condition FC1 = A1
S2      3         3............condition FC1 = A2
S3      6         6
When I drill down on FC1 and FC2, I see this...
S1      A1    B1    1      1
S1      A1    B2    1      1
S1      A1    B3    1      1
Result                 3      3
S2      A2    B4    1      1
S2      A2    B5    1      1
S2      A2    B6    1      1
Result                 3      3
S3      A1    B1    1      1
S3      A1    B2    1      1
S3      A1    B3    1      1
S3      A2    B4    1      1
S3      A2    B5    1      1
S3      A2    B6    1      1
Result                 6      6
Basically, we do not want to see the breakdown on S3 when we drilldown on the free characteristics...Any ideas how to do this ?

Thanks Rakesh, but thats not what I am looking for. May be I did not put the question right. I want to see the report as below when I drilldown on my free chars.
S1 A1 B1 1 1
S1 A1 B2 1 1
S1 A1 B3 1 1
Result 3 3
S2 A2 B4 1 1
S2 A2 B5 1 1
S2 A2 B6 1 1
Result 3 3
S3 -    - 6 6

Allocation Structure, Settlement issue

Dear All,
I have created a Allocation Structure with following details:
Allocation Structure: XX
Assignment: 01, 02, 03...
Co AREA: YYYY
In Source: I assigned relevant Cosat element groups
In Settelment Cost Elements: I assigned Secondary Cost elements
I have maintained the Settlement rule to settle WBS to CTR in CJ20N.
I have also checked that Allocation Structure XX is comming in Settlement paramters in the WBS (CJ20N)
After few postings on WBS element i get an error "Maintain sources for allocation structure A1 (this is pointing to a different allocation structure) in controlling area YYYY"
Ques 1: Is there any other config to be maintained required to Settle the Project to CTR.
Ques 2: In the settlement Profile what Document type i need to maintain?? Is this mandatory?
Ques 3: Is it must to create a source structure?
Warm Regards,
Jatinder

Dear Gokul,
Yes this is newly configured allocation structure.
I have created a new settlement profile (where i have also assigned the new allocation structure) and assigned the Project profile.
Regards,
Jatinder

Structure Authorization Issue

Hi guys,
I don't have structure authorization implemented or HR system implemented. I was playing with my sandbox system to learn structure authorization by using step by step tutorial. After I created a structure authorization for two users I deleted everything related to structure authorization but unfortunately, some t-codes related to org chart for example PPOME, PPOMW are not working properly, its not allowing to create new org char.
We have another team needs to create some org chart for prototyping but they can't create org chart its giving no authorization error when I ran SU53 it's not giving regular auth error its also give failed HR structure authorization error, this is the error in su53 coming (Date 10/01/2010 and time Plan version 01 Object ID 5000075 Action LISD) there are so many different object ID on the list.
They all already have SAP_ALL in the system. Can anybody give some kind of report so I remove structure authorization completely from the system.
Please help
Thanks

Structural Authorization Check
Structural authorizations are used to grant access to view information for personnel where HR OM has been implemented as we stated. The Access is granted to a user implicitly by the useru2019s position on the organizational plan.
On top of the general authorization check, which is based on authorization objects, you can define additional authorizations by hierarchical structures.
In each area, the combination of start object and [Evaluation Path|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/35/26c256afab52b9e10000009b38f974/content.htm] from an existing structure returns a specific number of objects. This exact combination, in other words the number of objects returned by this combination, represents a useru2019s [Structural profile|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/0c/49ba3b3bf00152e10000000a114084/content.htm]. So structural authorization check is therefore based on a Dynamic concept: The concrete objects that are returned by a structural profile change as the structure (under the start object) changes.
Steps to Perform to Set Up Structural Authorization Check in brief:
(Before start moving for str. auth profile it is assumed that the Switch AUTSW for HR General Authorization check is also activated in table T77S0. Structural Authorization won't give the access for accessing HR data as described in the last posts and works together with General Authorization - to remind you)
1. Integration: Control parameters for the integration of Personnel Planning and Development (PD) with other applications (such as Personnel Administration (PA) and Cost Accounting (CO), etc.) are specified in the "PLOGI" group.
2. Turn on PD PA switch: TCode used is OOPS. Ensure value registered for PLOGI u2013 ORGA is X. No other values need to be checked or changed.
(Note: PD and PA sub modules of HR are not configured to share data by default in the SAP delivered system. This switch must be on for data to flow between both modules.)
3. Turn on Structural Authorizations Main Switches : TCode is OOAC. Value for ORGPD is set to 1.
4. Create Org. Plan (check the first post).
(Note: Do not create your Organizational Plan without this switch on. If you do, structural authorizations will not work and some org and infotype setup will not work. You cannot turn the switch on and get structural authorizations on an organizational plan, that was created while it was off, to work..)
5. Create Personnel Master Record: Tcode is PA40. This is time consuming staff.
6. Create record for Infotype 0105 - TCode is PA30.
7. Create Structural Authorization Profiles u2013 TCode = OOSP
8. Create entry for IT 1017 - TCode is PO10 (Organizational Unit) or PO13 (Position).
9. Assignment of Structural Authorizations: The assignment of the Structural Authorization can be found with good details here in [SAP Help|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/97/27973b3ea3eb0fe10000000a114084/frameset.htm].
Please check and let us know for any query.
Regards,
Dipanjan

Structure design issue

I am designing an EDD. I have an element which can contain a large hierarchy of subelements.There is text I want to display at the start and end of the element (same text in both locations), but I don't want the user to have to enter it twice. If it were simply a string, I'd make it an attribute and include its value in a prefix and a suffix. However, it's a cross-reference.
I am currently considering making the cross-reference the first child of the original element and then using a plug-in or script to copy the cross-reference text into an attribute that I insert into a suffix. This solution is not elegant and it complicates my application since I do not otherwise need a plug-in or script.
Can anyone suggest another approach?
Thanks.

Russ,
I phrased the question the way I did to make it general and not tie it to my specific application.
Since you ask, however, I use a structured FrameMaker application to edit XSLT code itself.The structure used when editing is similar but distinct from the actual XSLT structure. For example, I can have nested, automatically numbered lists within comments and comment out text that includes comments. I type most names (such as variable, template, and paramenter names) only once and then use those names through cross-references. Thus, I can change a name as a transform develops, update cross-references and be sure that all uses are updated, and so forth. I won't take the time to give a complete description here, there's some detail on an early version at http://www.txstruct.com/papers/TriXML06.EditingXSLT.pdf.
As I am editing, the content of the document window looks like XSLT even though the structure differs slightly from actual XSLT. The intent is that users (who must be XSLT programmers) easily understand the correspondence between the two structures. I am revising the application. One of the enhancements is extended namespace support. Currently, I have a structure similar to:
<LiteralResultElement gi="Elt">
     <LiteralResultAttributes>
           <LiteralResultAttribute attribute_name="Att1">Val1</LiteralResultAttribute>
           <LiteralResultAttribute attribute_name="Att2">Val2</LiteralResultAttribute>
    </LiteralResultAttributes>
</LiteralResultElement>
In the document window and after running the post-process transform when saving the document as XML, this structure appears as:
<Elt Att1="Val1" Att2="Val2">
</Elt>
A major goal of the application is that the content of the document window should look like the final output. This approach works well. Currently, though, when I want a namespace prefix on the name of the literal result element, I just type the prefix in the gi attribute (for example, the FM equivalent of <LiteralResultElement gi="pref:Elt">). This convention means that if I decide to change a prefix, I have to find all occurrences of it throughout my document (or book if I'm using multiple files) and change them all. A better solution would be to put a cross-reference to the xmlns:pref attribute inside the literal result element so that I can change the prefix once and update all its uses automatically.
To answer your question, finally, I am currently using XSLT to prepare output and not to affect the appearance of the document window during editing. The reason I started this thread was to ask for ideas on how to approach this problem.
     --Lynne
P.S. Anyone who would like to try the application is welcome to contact me.

Deep structure output Issue:

Hello everyone,
I have an output form that simply contains billing document item records. Repeating subform
works great. However I have been asked to make a more complex solution. I have been
tasked to output the corresponding condition records for each billing item.
I have even tried to build a deep structure where one field is the condition records for the billing item.
I am not having luck. The billing items repeat, but the condition records do not. I have even embedding a subform
inside of another, but it doesn't allow repeating.
Any thoughts to resolve this?
So the output would be :
billing item
condition recs
condition recs
condition recs
billing item
condition recs
condition recs
condition recs

check this shizzle out...
Hi,
if its like colum1, column2 (tab2).
you can represent column2 as a nested table in the form. and put these tables structure intoa subform of type flowed.
then you can have the required format.
the same can also be acheived using nested subforms instead of tables.
example of such scenario is PO & line items.
po number1 , items 1
item 2
item 3
po number2 , items 1
item 2
item 3
hope this helps you.
Cheers,
Sai
found here - Re: Nested Table: How to display formatted text in the form ?

View Criteria issue on ADF Tree

Hi,
JDev 11.1.1.5.0
I am facing an issue while displaying ADF tree. I've created ParentVO & ChildVO from a single table with view criteria to filter the nodes.And then created two View links ParentToChild & ChildToChild.
Added VOs & corresponding ViewLinks to ApplicationModule. When I tried to run application module, getting the results as per expectation (applying view criteria at each level).
Now i've dragged the parent vo from data control on to jspx page. when I run the jspx page, it's displaying the tree structure.
Issue is only view criteria is applying for top level nodes(parent VO) but not sub levels. If there is some issue with creation of View criteria then it should give same problem while executing AM. But while running AM, getting the expected results.
It would be great if you provide any clue on this issue
Thanks,
Samba

Thanks for your response.
But my usecase is different. I need to filter the sublevels of the tree.
Following is the sample
Level1
     Level1.1
     Level1.2
     Level1.3
Level2
     Level2.1
     Level2.2
     Level2.3
     Level2.4
Level3
     Level3.1
     Level3.2
     Level3.3
If I gave View Criteria as contains '2' then, Need to filter the nodes contains character 2. Able to filter first level nodes according VC. But VC is not applying for sub levels. Is there any way to set the VC in my case?

BPEL 10.1.3.5 calling web service issue.

Hi All,
I am basically calling a java webservice from BPEL which takes XML as input along with some other value. The XML content is sent in a string format after stripping the namespaces in BPEL. When this XML content is received by the WS, its throwing an error saying "This parser does not support specification "null" version "null"", which it should have thrown when the XML content structure has issues. I mean the WS is expecting one structure and the BPEL is posting another. As a part of our debugging process, we realized that the WS is looking for some jar libraries before processing the data,which were not available and its throwing this error. The same web service when invoked explicitly, is perfectly accepting the same XML content.
Can anyone please suggest how to take this ahead. Should I be adding these java jar libraries in our oc4j application server or is there any other workaround. No doubt the XSD has no issues. I am using SOA 10.1.3.5 version.
Any inputs would be a great help to resolve this. Many thanks in advance.
Gautham A

Hi all,
can anyone please respond to my issue. Its sort of urgent.
thanks,

Structure compatibiliyt issue.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for