Sub : Developer 6i Release 2 for NT - WebDB missing ??

Hi,
I have downloaded and installed Developer 6i Release 2 for NT but when I tried to configure
the virtual directories I found that the default WebDB Web server/Listener is missing in the
downloaded version.
(But in the installation manual, they mentioned it is available with this download)
In the Windows-Control Panel-Services, there are only 2 services are installed (Forms Server
and Reports Server), But earlier when I installed in my previous project, it included another
service "Oracle WebDB Listener", which is missing in this downloaded version.
Please help me in clarifying my below queries :
1)For web-deployment of Developer Forms 6i, what are the Oracle products to be purchased ?
2)Whether Developer 6i Release 2 for NT includes Oracle Default Web-Server/Listener (i.e.
WebDB Release 2.2)
(or) I have to purchase and install Oracle 9i Application Server which includes (Oracle9iAS
Portal - WebDB 3.0)
3)Whether below combination is compatible with each other and supported by Oracle :
a) Windows NT 4.0 (or) Windows 2000
b) Oracle8 Enterprise Edition Release 8.0.5.0.0
c) Developer 6i Release 2 for NT
d) Oracle9iAS Enterprise Edition
thanks and regards,
Shashi
[email protected]
FY[i]Long postings are being truncated to ~1 kB at this time.

To run Oracle Forms 6i on the Web you need to license Oracle9iAS EE version 1.0.2.
This includes portal and will automatically configure the Forms installation for you.

Similar Messages

Developer 6i Release 2 for NT - WebDB missing ??

Hi,
I have downloaded and installed Developer 6i Release 2 for NT but when I tried to configure the virtual directories I found that the default WebDB Web server/Listener is missing in the downloaded version.
(But in the installation manual, they mentioned it is available with this download)
In the Windows-Control Panel-Services, there are only 2 services are installed (Forms Server and Reports Server), But earlier when I installed in my previous project, it included another service "Oracle WebDB Listener", which is missing in this downloaded version.
Please help me in clarifying my below queries :
1)For web-deployment of Developer Forms 6i, what are the Oracle products to be purchased ?
2)Whether Developer 6i Release 2 for NT includes Oracle Default Web-Server/Listener (i.e. WebDB Release 2.2)
(or) I have to purchase and install Oracle 9i Application Server which includes (Oracle9iAS Portal - WebDB 3.0)
3)Whether below combination is compatible with each other and supported by Oracle :
a) Windows NT 4.0 (or) Windows 2000
b) Oracle8 Enterprise Edition Release 8.0.5.0.0
c) Developer 6i Release 2 for NT
d) Oracle9iAS Enterprise Edition
thanks and regards,
Shashi
[email protected]
FYI: The location of the d[i]Long postings are being truncated to ~1 kB at this time.

To run Oracle Forms 6i on the Web you need to license Oracle9iAS EE version 1.0.2.
This includes portal and will automatically configure the Forms installation for you.

GeoRaptor 3.2.1 Released for SQL Developer 3.x

Spatialites!
After 6 months of development and testing, GeoRaptor 3.2.1 has been released for SQL Developer 3.x (tested on 3.0, 3.1 and 3.2). This release no longer supports SQL Developer 1.x or 2.x releases due to internal changes to the SQL Developer APIs.
GeoRaptor can be downloaded from the GeoRaptor project's sourceforge page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/georaptor and installed via Help>Check for Updates>Install from Local File. Installation via SQL Developer's update mechanism should be available soon.
The release notes for this release are:
* Fixed issues with validate geometry functionality in particular the update dialog box.
* Revamped "About GeoRaptor" form. Includes clickable URLs, links to mailing lists, version number listing, thanks to testers etc.
* Placed "About GeoRaptor" icon on GeoRaptor's map toolbar.
* SQL Developer NLS settings accessed: improvements in the display and entry and numeric data.
-- Tolerances in Spatial Layer properties will display with the NLS decimal separator eg 0,05.
 Some parts of GeoRaptor such as Validation that show and accept numbers have not been changed from when someone else modified the code.
 If you double click on the left MBR/right MBR icon in the map at the bottom, the current centre position will display according to the NLS settings.
 Editing the value to jump the map to that point works even with grouping separators and decimal separators being commas!
* Spatial Layer Draw has been modified to use NLS based decimal formatting.
* New geometry marking/labelling options have been added. In particular you can now label the vertices of a linestring/polygon with the following additional elements:
-- Cumulative length
-- Measure (M)
-- Z value
-- Labelling of vertices with <id>{X,Y} now also honours 3/4D geometries. If geometry has XYY then it will be labelled as {X,Y,Z} etc.
* You can also label each vector/segment of a linestring/polygon with:
-- Length
-- Cumulative Length
-- Bearing (approximate for geodetic/geographic data)
-- Distance (approximate for geodetic/geographic data)
-- Bearing and Distance (approximate for geodetic/geographic data)
* The font properties of the mark text can be changed independently of the feature label. This includes the offset and label position (CC, LL, UR etc).
* New feature labelling options have been provided:
-- First/middle/last vertex,
-- Any supplied sdo_point within a line/polygon's sdo_geometry object, or
-- Calculated by GeoRaptor on the client side using Java Topology Suite.
* Result sets now have the ability to:
-- Copy to clipboard all geometries across many rows and columns.
-- Display one or more (selected) geometries in a popup image window. This functionality is also available in the result set generated by an Identify command.
* New GeoRaptor Preferences:
-- Width and height in pixels of the new popup image window (displaying one or more geometry objects) can be set;
-- Colours of orphan, missing and correct metadata entries for Metadata Manager;
-- Prefixing with MDSYS for all currently supported spatial objects - sdo_geometry, sdo_point, sdo_elem_info, sdo_ordinates, sdo_dim_info - has been made an option.
-- There is now a new property called "Show Number Grouping Separator" in Tools>GeoRaptor>Visualisation.
 If it is ticked a number will be formatted with the thousands separator in Tools>Database>NLS eg 10000.000 will display as 10,000.000.
* Sdo_Geometry display of all spaces in text between elements of the sdo_geometry array have been removed.
 This was done mainly to compact the sdo_geometry strings so that they are as small as possible when displaying or copying to clipboard.
* Help pages added to the following dialogs with more to follow:
-- Metadata Manager,
-- Shapefile Importer and
-- Layer Properties dialogs.
* GeoRaptor menu entries renamed. New "Manage All Metadata" entry added to View>GeoRaptor menu.
* Spatial Index creation dialog now supports additional index parameters and parallel build settings.
* Metadata Manager overhauled:
a. Shows:
 1. Metadata entries which have no underlying oracle object (orphan)
 2. Metadata entries for existing underlying objects (existing case)
 3. Database objects with sdo_geometry for which no metadata entry exists (new)
b. All orphan/existing/missing colours for (a) can be set via Preferences>GeoRaptor>Visualisation
c. All actions for main (bottom) metadata table are in a single right mouse click menu.
 Some entries will only appear if a single row is selection (metadata copy), others (delete and copy to clipboard) will appear for one or more.
d. Can now switch between open connections to modify metadata of other objects in schemas other than the starting object.
e. Buttons revamped.
* Tab/Shapefile export:
a. Export now supports NULL valued columns. Can be exported as an empty string (if DBase override in GeoRaptor Preferences is ticked) or
 as a predefined value eg NULL date => 1900-01-01 (set in new GeoRatptor Import/Export Preferences).
b. Some work attempted on export of NLS strings (still not corrected).
c. Objects with no rows now correctly processed.
* Shapefile Import
-- Bug relating to Linux file names corrected.
* Fixed issue (identified by John O'Toole) with spatial index underlying a view not being used in map display.
* Reinstated sdo_nn as the principal method for Identify (requested by John O'Toole).
* Fixed problem with handling single click zoom in and out in GeoRaptor map etc.
* Fixed problem with rendering lines from database item (identified by Vladimir Pek).The new "About GeoRaptor" should be read by all people installing GeoRaptor.
Please, please consider registering your email address with our private email list so that we can get a feel for the sorts of people downloading and installing GeoRaptor.
Please consider helping us with documentation or the internationalisation via translating properties files from English to your native language.
GeoRaptor is written and maintained by people who use SQL Developer and Spatial every day but we don't pretend we know everything that users want: please let us know via our feature request page at SourceForge.
We don't get paid for what we do so are always looking for additional help.
Here are some of the requests we have had for improvements:
1. MySQL access
2. WMS access;
3. Ability to import shapefile data into an existing table;
4. Ability to processing multiple shapefiles into separate tables (current version can import one or more into a single target table);
5. Ability to export/import layer definitions to give to others;
6. Support for non-English character sets for varchar exports to shapefiles.Some are relatively simply, some require a lot of engineering work. For the latter, we are considering alternative funding methods to the currently completely free development approach.
Thanks to the following for their invaluable assistance:
Holger Labe, Germany
John O'Toole, Ireland
Vladimir Pek, Czech Republic
Pieter Minnaar, Holland
Olaf Iseeger, Germany
Sandro Costa, Brazil;
Marco Giana, Australia.regards
Simon Greener
Principal GeoRaptor Developer
Edited by: Simon Greener on Sep 10, 2012 2:43 PM

Simon,
I will admit, I almost never use SQL Developer. I have been a long time Toad user, but for this tool, I fumbled around a bit and got everything up and running quickly.
That said, I tried the new GeoRaptor tool using this tutorial (which is I think is close enough to get the jist). http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/georaptor/index.php?title=A_Gentle_Introduction:_Create_Table,_Metadata_Registration,_Indexing_and_Mapping
As I stumble around it, I'll try and leave some feedback, and probably ask some rather stupid questions.
Thanks for the effort,
Bryan

Re: GeoRaptor 3.2.1 Released for SQL Developer 3.x

Hey,
Referencing this that was posted in early September 2012:
GeoRaptor 3.2.1 Released for SQL Developer 3.x
I am supporting GRE's and the like at UC Berkeley and I really want to hook them up with this plug because it will make their life MUCH easier. But I have some pretty basic problems:
1. A VERY simply table that has an 8307 linestring. The query that GR defaults when the table is added :
SELECT rowid,"ID","NETWORK_ID","BEG_NODE_ID","END_NODE_ID","LENGTH","SPEED_LIMIT","DETAIL_LEVEL",
"IN_SYNCH","CREATED","MODIFIED","CREATED_BY","MODIFIED_BY","MODSTAMP","NET_GEN_ID",t.GEOM as GEOM
FROM VIA.LINKS_HOLD t
WHERE SDO_FILTER(t.GEOM,?,?) = 'TRUE'This seems to do something but nothing is ever displayed. The table definition is as follows:
CREATE TABLE LINKS_HOLD (
ID NUMBER,
NETWORK_ID NUMBER,
BEG_NODE_ID NUMBER,
END_NODE_ID NUMBER,
GEOM MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY ,
LENGTH NUMBER(9,3),
SPEED_LIMIT NUMBER(3,0),
DETAIL_LEVEL NUMBER(3,0),
IN_SYNCH NUMBER(1,0),
CREATED DATE,
MODIFIED DATE,
CREATED_BY VARCHAR2(30 BYTE),
MODIFIED_BY VARCHAR2(30 BYTE),
MODSTAMP TIMESTAMP (6),
NET_GEN_ID NUMBER
)And some sample data. I am only including the geometry
GEOM(SDO_GTYPE, SDO_SRID, SDO_POINT(X, Y, Z), SDO_ELEM_INFO, SDO_ORDINATES)
SDO_GEOMETRY(2002, 8307, NULL, SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 2, 1), SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-118.18477, 34.02929, -118.18156, 34.02932))
SDO_GEOMETRY(2002, 8307, NULL, SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 2, 1), SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-118.18268, 34.02393, -118.18269, 34.02631))
SDO_GEOMETRY(2002, 8307, NULL, SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 2, 1), SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-118.18269, 34.02631, -118.18268, 34.02393))
SDO_GEOMETRY(2002, 8307, NULL, SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 2, 1), SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-118.18257, 34.02731, -118.18387, 34.0273))
SDO_GEOMETRY(2002, 8307, NULL, SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 2, 1), SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-118.18387, 34.0273, -118.18257, 34.02731))
SDO_GEOMETRY(2002, 8307, NULL, SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 2, 1), SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-118.18256, 34.02631, -118.18269, 34.02631))
SDO_GEOMETRY(2002, 8307, NULL, SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 2, 1), SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-118.18269, 34.02631, -118.18256, 34.02631))
SDO_GEOMETRY(2002, 8307, NULL, SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 2, 1), SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-118.18131, 34.02632, -118.18256, 34.02631))
SDO_GEOMETRY(2002, 8307, NULL, SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 2, 1), SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-118.18256, 34.02631, -118.18131, 34.02632))
SDO_GEOMETRY(2002, 8307, NULL, SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1, 2, 1), SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-118.18257, 34.02731, -118.18256, 34.02631))Since the query I tried to substitute for the system generated one was:
select geom from links_hold ;When I tried to run that the system responded with and error and pasted the following into the clipboard:
SELECT rowid, GEOM as GEOM FROM (
select
rowid,geom
from
via.links_hold
? MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY(2003,8307,NULL,MDSYS.SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1,1003,3),MDSYS.SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(-180.0,-165.78279266572636, 180.0,165.78279266572636))
? Please keep in mind that very same query will display all the links where I run in the generic map view (GMV) of SQLD and
since GMV has little in the way of additional features it is rather frustrating to see your tool not really working, or what
is more likely is that I have a lack of understanding because I cannot find documentation that will allow me to
move forward w/o bugging you.
So Any light you can throw on this would be of great assistance. Thanks much!

Flying Guy,
The non-display is a major bug that was discovered after GeoRaptor 3.2 was released. I knew it was there a few days after
the release - it got past our testers as well. I hoped to have a release out very soon after but a bunch of things conspired to
stop this from happening. Anyway, no one complained so I figured no one was using it enough to find the bug.
The bug is fixed which you can test if you download the Early Access release from our SourceForge website.
There are some other new functions in this EA that you might discover. The main one being the ability to have a feature count
(those drawn within the map window) displayed on the view / layer tree. See GeoRaptor preferences. Another is the restoration
of right mouse click menus on the sdo_geometry columns of table/mv/view connection nodes. Also, if a table has more than one
sdo_geometry column, the first is no longer selected if you right mouse click/map etc on table node. It will display a pick list
of sdo_geometry columns for you to chose from. (There has also been a major revamp of connection management as I noted
problems since SQL Developer 3.2.)
Please download and try it. Consider joining the GeoRaptor lists to help with testing and documenting. If you find bugs in
the EA please email the right georaptor list, or use the GeoRaptor SourceForge site to register the bug. Or email me
directly simon at spatialdbadvisor dot come.
I hope to have a release ready by the end of the week but I have not heard back from the small group of testers
that we have something that is ready to go.
Wrt documentation we have added some where users have created some for me with my input. Please volunteer to
create documentation.
The simple fact of life is that:
1. GeoRaptor is downloaded by lots and lots of people (a good thing).
But:
<complain>
2. Very few responses ever occur to postings made about GeoRaptor on this forum or on our sourceforge forum: disheartening;
3. Very few bug reports or enhancement requests ever get created at sourceforge: disheartening;
4. I have become the only developer which is a bad thing. I known of some Java developers who have used GeoRaptor but
most/all expect someone else to fix bugs or develop the tool. I have spend thousands of hours on a tool that I find useful because SQL Developer
is my main Oracle access tool. But I have never, ever heard from more than 10 people over the past 3 years that they too find it useful: disheartening;
5. Attempts to contact downloaders routinely fall on deaf ears or fail: disheartening;
6. Requests for documenters, developers, testers are ignored or fail because we can't contact anyone who downloads GeoRaptor: disheartening.
</complain>
Like a lot of open source projects I do not get paid for anything I do. But what annoys me is that no one - other than a tiny brace of people - will help with anything
even when we ask.
I have also decided that major new functionality added to GeoRaptor eg GeoRasters; WMS; WFS; etc will only be done when sufficient funding, via a fundraising website
makes a set amount. This is something that the PostGIS have started doing and I think it only fair considering how many months each year I spend on development "in
the dark" for no income.
regards
Simon

JSP demo PTS included with Oracle 9i Developer Release for Mac not working

Hello all, please pardon my ignorance, but I am an Oracle DBA not a JSP programmer.
I have installed Oracle 9i developer release for Mac OSX and it included a demo application in JSP called pts.
I followed all the instruction and it still doesn't seem to work.
When I try to login to the application I get the following exception:
exception
org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to compile class for JSP
An error occurred at line: 3 in the jsp file: /oradev/pts/solmktinit.inc
Generated servlet error:
[javac] Since fork is true, ignoring compiler setting.
[javac] Compiling 1 source file
[javac] Since fork is true, ignoring compiler setting.
[javac] /usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.24/work/Standalone/localhost/_/oradev/pts/login_jsp.java:7: cannot resolve symbol
[javac] symbol : class DBAccess
[javac] location: package pts
[javac] import oradev.pts.DBAccess;
I'm not sure what this means or how to fix it. I'm sure it's something simple like modifying my classpath or something, but, as I said, I don't know where to begin.
Any assistance or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Can't you just use the 10g client ?
I have not tested the 9i dev. with oci calls but I would not be surprised if you try this on tiger. That won't work AFAIK.
regards,
Ronald.
http://homepage.mac.com/ik_zelf/oracle

Download Problem for Oracle9i Developer Suite Release 2

Hi,
I have been trying to download Oracle9i Developer Suite Release 2 from http://otn.oracle.com/software/products/ids/htdocs/winsoft.html
There are two zip files
1. A99230-01.zip (606,797,721 bytes)
2. A99231-01.zip (207,292,517 bytes)
I was able to download (2) completely and is able to extract files from the Zip format. But after trying 4-5 times downloading the (1) still I am unsuccessful.
After the files download reaches somewhere around 250,000,000 bytes it says the download is complete but when I try to open the Zip files, it says the Zip is invalid. Is there any problem with the Zip that is uploaded to this site. How can I solve this problem.
Is it possible for me to get the Free S/w on CDs like we used to get for forms 6i through OTN site? If so where should I register for the same?
thanks in Advance
Anil Krishnan

It seems that it is only possible to start download of two files at a time. If you try to start more, the system hangs up. If you are trying to download the version that is split in ten files, you have to do this one file at a time. If you are trying to download a single file, make sure that this is the ONLY download session that is running on your computer.
Yours sincerely
Niels Terp

Oracle Forms Developer 6i Release 2 for NT

Hello,
I have a couple of questions. I just downloaded the Oracle9iAS
Forms Services and Oracle Forms Developer 6i Release 2 for NT.
Is it a trial version? Does it expire after a certain time. Or
is it a limited feature version. I couldn't find any info about
this on the Oracle website.
Regards,
Tam

AS with all the downloads on otn this is a full version with no
time limit. But you are under the OTN license which says that
you have to purchase the product if you are developing
production applications with it. Its free for evaluation and
personal education purposes.

Pick release for sub inventory

hi
can i have pick release for subinventory if i have stock for sales in diferent store
Thanks

The allocation rules allow you to pick it from the subinventory, check your pick release rule.
Srini C

ChaRM: Normal Change - Not possible to set "Successfully Tested" unless the Maint. Cycle is set to "In Development with Release"

Hello,
I'm doing some tests with ChaRM, Normal Change scenario.
As far as I know, the following steps would be the correct sequence (concerning development and test phases only):
1) Developers perform the correction in DEV and release their TASKS of the transport request
2) Developer Lead set the Normal Change document status to "to be tested"
3) In background, a Transport of Copies is created with all data previously stored in the original transport request. Then this ToC is transported into QAS
4) Change Manager set the Maintenance Cycle status to "Test"
5) Tester performs the test into QAS
6) Tester provides a valuable feedback and set Normal Change document status to "tested successfully"
According to the following SAP Portal article, it seems to be correct:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sm71_sp10/helpdata/en/48/db938dceba518de10000000a42189c/frameset.htm
During my tests, however, I have noticed that it is just possible to go from step 5 to 6 if the Maintenance Cycle status is set to "In Development with Release" (go a step back in the Cycle). Otherwise, I get the following error messages:
Warning Message Details Status was reset by system
Warning Message Details Action RELEASE_ALL cannot be performed during this maintenance phase
Warning Message Next status cannot be set because some actions cannot be executed.
Once I have done the Cycle status change, then it is possible to move from 5 to 6 without errors and then the original transport request is transported into QAS too.
Question: Is this the correct behavior or am I missing customizing?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Daniel

Hello Vivek,
Thanks for your reply.
It is kinda weird the steps sequence, since the Tester needs to tell the Change Manager to move the cycle's status before approving the correction done in QAS (successfully tested).
Perhaps a new action between "to be tested" and "successfully tested" could exist, in order to request the CM to perform the cycle update.
But OK, that's how it is.
Regards,
Daniel

MVC sub controller event handling for tabStrip

Hi all,
This is my first time on SDN so please forgive any procedural errors. I am developing an application for several dealer functions and use tabstrip and MVC. My main controller / view contains the tabstrip items and I call a seperate sub controller from the main view for each of the tabstrip items.
(<bsp:call comp_id="track"/> where comp_id is a sub controller created in method do_init of the controller.) The sub controller classes were created using the MVC design pattern, each with a view and a model.
Problem: When I am in any of the called sub controller views / tab items and I enter some data for the specific tab item, the do_handle_event method for that specific view / tab item sub controller is not activated. Processing goes directly to the do_handle_event of the main controller.
My understanding of the process is that the do_handle_event for a sub controller will be activated first before processing return to the parent controller. This will allow me to use the tab items as independent views with the processing logic being handled by the relevant model. Am I correct in this assumption? I have read the forums on the handling of tabstrips and have looked at the sample applications but somehow I am missing a bit of the logic. Can someone please help?
Regards,
Jan van der Spuy

Hello Bernhard/Shiva,
I have changed the comp-id and debugged the DO_REQUEST event for main controller in more detail.
The field values are
htmlbevt_t<htmlb:button:click:null
hmlbevt_f<htmlb_form_1
htmlbevt_o<htmlb_button_1
htmlbevt_i<onTracking
htmlbevt_c<0
onInputPro<htmlb
tracking_t<9346100P&A
tracking_t<1010
 |
m_subcontrollers[1]-INSTANCE
METHOD DISPATCH INPUT
Call registered controllers with form fields
Call all registered controllers, even if no form_fields for them are r
LOOP AT m_subcontrollers ASSIGNING <controller> where hide = ''.
 CHECK <controller>-fields[] IS NOT INITIAL.
 <controller>-instance->fill_values(
 form_fields = <controller>-fields
 global_messages = component_messages ).
IF_BSP_CONTROLLER_FILL_VALUES(IF_BSP_CONTROLLER)
performance shortcut if no subcontroller is present
 if m_subcontrollers is intial.
 do_handle_data(
 form_fields = form_fields
 global_messages = global_messages ).
 return.
 endif.
From here it goes to the DO_HANDLE_DATA method of the subcontroller and returns.
A bit further in the logic of DISPATCH_INPUT() is where things go wrong.
* Dispatch event to controller
if event_value is not initial.
 if event_comp_index = 0.
 component_event = do_handle_event(
 event = event_value
 htmlb_event = request_event
htmlb_event_ex = event_data
global_messages = component_messages ).
 And the values are as follows:
component_event (NO VALUE) IS THIS THE PROBLEM?
request_event
event_data
component_messages

Exclusive update release for Adobe Cloud customers

Excuse me, Adobe.
Don't get this wrong, I personally have nothing against Adobe. Please know and realize that Adobe probably don't realize this, or simply don't have a heart to realize this by now. Adobe actually losing some valuable registered lifetime 'diehard' Adobe customers like other creative professionals and myself.
Yesterday I learned that Adobe released exclusive update release only for Adobe Creative Cloud customers with Illustrator's new package update. I find that very ironic approach, because I know that diehard Adobe Illustrator customers have request for it for years. Adobe basically ignored us, creative professionals, instead of us, focusing on Adobe Creative Cloud customers.
Rest assured, Adobe Master Collection CS6 is more likely my final upgrade purchase. It was a big slap in my face. I know that it is not just me, knowing that many other creative professionals are upset as I am.
Don't get me wrong, I wholeheartedly am (now was) a lifetime diehard Adobe customer.
Dear Adobe, just tell me if I am wrong. I just cannot justify the cost benefit analysis on advantage of Adobe Creative Cloud, where it is more of "renting" while many other creative professionals including myself prefer traditional way of upgrading through Adobe online store just as in the past and at present time. Many of us prefer "traditional" way of "owning" Adobe Creative Suite apps rather than 'renting' apps. In a long run, by owning traditional app/purchase do have super duper advantage over Cloud in terms of real cost of doing business. While traditional customers like myself still own Adobe apps even if when Adobe decides no longer support, we still own the legacy versions regardless.
So, what happens if one day, out of blue, I fear that Adobe eventually realize that Adobe Creative Cloud is not viable or feasible to continue. That will certainly make some customers not happy. What happens to traditional customers like creative professionals and myself spent huge amount of investment in traditional qualified upgrades, and then switched to Cloud.. then one day Adobe decide not to support Adobe Creative Cloud.. what does this means to traditional customers like myself owned versions of serialization numbers over the years - down in the drain and Adobe Creative Cloud 'temporary' annual serial number no longer viable, and force us to pay FULL traditional license all over again. In that case, that is where I am dealing with this concern. I just cannot possibly trust Adobe on that one. I do have huge benefit of doubt on that one.
For example, with Adobe decided to invest some of its resources developed new applications such as Adobe Flash Catalyst and few others in Adobe Creative Suite CS5. When Adobe released CS6, Adobe dropped Flash Catalyst. That is one of example on why I do have benefit of doubt on long term viability and feasibility of Adobe Creative Cloud.
Please listen to us, creative professionals out of our concerns.
If Adobe refuse to listen, include us in that respect, so be it. It is possible that Adobe eventually be losing many lifetime, diehard Adobe creative professionals.
To be honest, I am very disappointed with Adobe's attitude toward creative professionals' being diehard lifetime support and invested lot of our time, tools, and skills and everything... time and money. It is all down in the drain. Thanks!
Have a fabulous day!

And customers fall for it like suckers.
Software development during the emergence of a new category has always been lucrative. A small handful of developers with a good idea sweat blood for a couple years building the core application. Once it exists, delivery is cheap and profit-per-sale is high. Users buy licenses for several hundreds of dollars each. Each new license sale costs next to nothing to replicate in terms of manufacturing. It's all marketing, packaging, and distrubution. Disks are copied and printed for less than $1 each. Printed manuals, of course, may cost $20 or so, depending on color, quality, etc. There is real overhead, of course, in developing good content for manuals.
When all this stuff was new software titles used to cost less, but shipped with installation disks and thorough printed manuals, and a set of added-value extras, like utilities, fonts, clipart. And new version improvements were quite significant and innovative.
But once the software category "matures," with each version, the prices go up; the bundled "extras" become fewer. The focus shifts toward continually look for ways to cheap-out on the customers in order to "improve" the margin for the stockholders, and "milk" the increasingly archaic and mundane software for all that can be got out of it. One way this is done is by turning real value into mere perceived value. Adobe is the worst offender in this regard.
Print manuals have become pay-extra, or non-existent. It astounds me that in the much-ballyhooed age of "information at your fingertips" the ondisk local help has become increasingly difficult and tedious to access. Now, the default behavior of the Help menu has even been modified to disuade users from accessing local PDF versions of the documentation to coerce them to go online for help files access (this from the company that is highly dependent upon PDF). Slow, tedious, and non-contextual as it is, PDF was bad enough. Having to go to Adobe's crappy "community help" system is ridiculous.
This is all promoted, of course, as "immediate access to continual improvement." And customers fall for it like suckers.
Look at the increasingly innane questions that occur daily in this Forum. Newcomers ask the most basic questions, making it obvious they haven't even tried to read page one of the documentation. I've been at this stuff since the beginning. It didn't used to be this way.
Are they all lazy dolts? No. Documentation has become less accessible and less thorough.
Next, Adobe turns the online documentation essentially into blogs. "Live feedback"? "Continual improvement"? Baloney. Beginners clutter what should be authoritative documentation with innane comments. Questions get transferred to the User Forums, where Adobe sluffs off its responsibility for product support to its users; which more often than not turns into a time-wasting process of the blind leading the blind.
Of course, only a mere mention of the term "tech support" will suffice. Everyone knows what thas become.
Once you've eliminated the costs of printing, packaging, and delivering disks and documentation, and turned everything into electronic downloads (causing each customer hours of downtime--often even days futzing around with Adobe's horrible installers), what's next? Stockholders still want increased margin.
Software by subscription and web-centric automation--while still increasing prices, of course--has long been the holy grail of software developers. This is true of all the biggies, including Microsoft, and of course Adobe. But how do you pull it off? How do you convince the suckers?
Releasing new features to the buzzword "cloud" before making them available to perpetual licensees will be Adobe's attempt to "sweeten the pot" to con those who buy into the software subscription scheme. Time will tell how successful the ruse is for Adobe.
The truth is, though, in terms of actual quality of the product, (especially Illustrator) nothing has changed for the better. Look at the very features that we who choose to stay with the relative safety of a traditional license are so upset about: Bundle for output? Export embedded images?
People, how archaic, how old, how yesterdecade's news is that? This is "quick development" that can only be delivered by the "cloud"? Give me a break.
It's utterly laughable, as Illustrator's cobby, clumsy, over-glorified, under-delivered, decades-late-to-the-game delevery of practical functionality always has been. So what's the big rush anyway for features that are already literal decades late? Sheesh, guys, Illustrator is not the only game in town.
Consider: Since the release of CS6, how many posts have you forum regulars seen expressing excitement over the precious few actually new features, like grads-on-strokes? How many stunning examples of use of that feature have you seen users post?
By comarison, how many posts have you seen on complaints about performance and buggy behavior? And proportionally how many are still the endless stream of repeats of the same old questions from newcomers trying to make sense out of Illustrator's uncomparably unintuitive, cluttered, and confused interface? I see the latter largely increasing. And I take that as clear indication that Adobe's treatment of "newfangled" documentation is not working. (And, of course, that Illustrator's interface is still as hideously unintutitve as it has always been.)
Meanwhile, for the first time in too many years, I actually experienced again that new-purchase satisfaction of money-well-spent when I opened the Corel Graphic Design X6 Suite package to find a full-color manual with a hard-bound cover no less! Upgrade cost for anyone with a copy two full versions old? $200. Comes with 1000 OpenType fonts, huge clipart collection, truly useful utilities, and alot more.
I still get a thrill out of every new release of Xara Designer Pro. So much elegant functionality, such clean-running speed, so stunning results possible from that tidy, inviting, intuitive interface in so affordably-priced and fun-to-use application.
Meanwhile, Adobe upgrades have become more burden than pleasure. I actually dread them, especially having been suckered into the whole "Master Collection" thing. CS6 still sits on my desk uninstalled. I just dread having to mess with it.
Oh, but James! That's why you should buy into "the creative cloud"!
Well, don't hold your breath, bucko. If I decide to let CS7 or whatever just slide right by, I'll still be able to keep running the version I've got--without sending a monthly check to Adobe.
These days--when so many younsters who have never swung a hammer at a nail actually try to rationalize renting over home ownership; and when so many middle-agers rationalize making perpetual interest payments for the instant gratification of driving a new car every year--who knows; the "creative cloud" sham may actually succeed.
But not with me. Instead of watching money automatically fly out the window by itself, I'll be chuckling away, using whichever of my usual collection of 2D vector drawing programs I feel most advantageous--or most fun--for the task at hand.
JET

When will itunes develop ios 7 for ipod touch 4G??????? .

ITUNES TEAM AND THE DEVELOPERS NEED TO DEVELOP IOS 7 FOR IDEVICES THAT ARE CURRENTLY INCOMPATIBLE FOR IOS 7 BECAUSE IT IS TOTALLY UNFAIR AND BIASED FOR SOME TO HAVE AN IOS DEVICE WHICH IS NOT RUNNING ON THE LATEST SOFTWARE RELEASED!!!!!!!!
I HOPE MY WORDS ARE HEARD AND ARE BEING SUPPORTED BY THE REST IOS DEVICE USERS WHO FEEL THE SAME WAY AND ARE EXPERIENCING THE SAME PROBLEM.THANK YOU!!!!!

Never. It doesn't have enough RAM to run iOS 7, and there have been iOS devices incapable of running the latest release for three and a half years.
(99432)

What's new in these days?Seeking to persuade, Adobe still insist FP Development. Waiting for answer

Seeking to persuade, Adobe still insist FP Development. Waiting for answer on line.
I am an AS3 developer, deeply in love with it. Recently I was very disappointed with Adobe.
Fp11.8 seems update frequenctly, but nearly no change. New feathers is all the same every time, why? Unity 3d and Fusion Chart has said goodbay to Flash Player, Weather Adobe is also?

Not sure exactky what's your point, but FP has been gaining some pretty nice features. The GameInput API, for example, is awesome despite a couple of remaining bugs, and a few cool GPU-acceleration features and updates have been creeping in FP too. I'd assume the frequent updates are more due to stability, while point releases are the ones where you see new features. You may want to double-check the changelog to see what has been changed on every version.
Unity has said goodbye to Flash because it solved a problem that was virtually nonexistant, and Fusion Charts would do better with a more cross-platform solution (e.g. Canvas/SVG) considering their target audience. I don't think either have anything to do with Flash technology per se.

What table and fileds we have to use to develop a report for blocked

what table and fileds we have to use to develop a report for blocked invoices?

VBRK-RFBSK
 Error in Accounting Interface
A Billing document blocked for forwarding to FI
B Posting document not created (account determ.error)
C Posting document has been created
D Billing document is not relevant for accounting
E Billing Document Canceled
F Posting document not created (pricing error)
G Posting document not created (export data missing)
H Posted via invoice list
I Posted via invoice list (account determination error)
K Accounting document not created (no authorization)
L Billing doc. blocked for transfer to manager (only IS-OIL)
M Analyst Approval refused (only IS-OIL)
N No posting document due to fund management (only IS-PS)
Regards
prabhu

How can i develope a report for getting purchase requisition details

how can i develope a report for getting purchase requisition details like mrp controller release date unit of measure

Hi,
Go to Tcode ME53(Purchase requisition display). Give any preq number and click the item overview button..
in the next page click select one item and press item details button(or F2 button)..In the next page all your requiresd fields will be there.. put cursor in reqd field and press f1.. in the pop up box press techical details(hammer button) to get the field name as well as the transparent table.. Use those fields and table in ur program..
hope it helps
Award points if it helps

Sub : Developer 6i Release 2 for NT - WebDB missing ??

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for