Subsequent acquistion and deprecation

Hi,
This is Amar i hava a issue regards deprecation.
for ex: on 01.01.2007 on asset is capitised by1000 and the deprecation is calculated 10% that is 100.
for the same asset subsequent acquisation is 500 on 01.06.2007. but the deprecation is taking for the full year means 12 month. but my clint want to deprecation for the subsequent acquisation is form the posting date. is it possialbe are not. if any on know please let me konw.
Regards,
Amar.

Hi pankaew,
i think u r not understand my problem, he purchased one asset on 01.01.2007, for the same asset he added some value on the middle of the year. if we run the deprecation it is calculate for the full year deprecation for subsequent accusation asset aslo. but my client want to calculate the deprecation for the subsequent vacation for the posting date on words.
EX:on 01.01.2007 asset capitalization 1000.
for the same asset some amount is added(means subsequent accusation) on 05.01.2007 is 200
now Deprecation calculate is going like that. 1200/10=120
but my cline wat to =1000/10 =100
and =200/10 =20*8/12 =13.33
now total dep for asset is = 100+13.33 =113.33

Similar Messages

HT1751 if i back up my itunes library to an external hard drive and then add subsequent music and want to back that up a few days later, can i backup the only newly added music without backing up the entire library again?

hello,
if i back up my itunes library to an external hard drive and then add subsequent music and want to back up the newly added music a few days later, can i do it without backing up the entire library again? or do i need to back up the entire library each and every time i back up to the external hard drive?

Just copy Users/yourusername/Music/iTunes (containing your library-files) to your external drive as well as that (extaernal) folder that contains all your audio-tracks.

Subsequent debit, subsequent credit and credit memo?

Dear Gurus,
Kindly explain subsequent debit, subsequent credit and credit memo with one simple example..pls..
Thanks..

Hi,
Subsequent Debits/Credits are used in cases where the quantity is in the original invoice is to remain the same. For eg.
PO 10 - $10
Gr 10 - $10
LIV 10 - $11 (Logistics Invoice Verification)
The vendor invoice is more than that in the Purchase Order. In order to correct, the Vendor may send in another invoice for
the Increased amount or a credit memo for the increased amount.
If you approve of the price increase, post the subsequent invoice received as a Subsequent Debit/Credit Invoice.
If it is a credit memo that has been received, then post the credit memo as Subsequent Debit/Credit.
This would retain the quantity but reduce the amount.
Subsequent Debit/Credit is for the case when the credit is not for the full amount eg. if the Vendor decided to credit
only the $1 overcharged.
Credit memo is for the credit of the full amount and value.
Credit Memo u2013 A credit memo is received from a vendor if you were overcharged on a previous invoice. It is processed as a reversal of a previous invoice on a quantity and value basis referencing a Purchase Order. In the same way the system assumes a corresponding goods receipt was posted for the original invoice, the system assumes a credit memo is linked to the reversal of a goods receipt. You must change the transaction from Invoice to Credit memo.
Subsequent Credit u2013 You receive a credit memo from a vendor decreasing the total invoiced value on a previous invoice, not the total invoiced quantity. You must change the transaction from Invoice to Subsequent credit. It is a reduction of value but not quantity by the amount of the credit memo.
Subsequent Debit u2013 You receive an additional invoice from a vendor because you were undercharged, increasing the total invoiced value, not the total invoiced quantity. You must change the transaction from Invoice to Subsequent debit. It is processed as an increase in value but not the quantity by the amount of the additional invoice.
Hope it helps,
Swapnil

Subsequent debit and credit

Dear Sap team
What is the Meaning of subsequent debit and credit. Exactly where we using in MM Point of view. which scenario it will come.
Regards,
G.Bala

Please search forum before posting,lot of threads discussed about subject briefly and also refer sap help documentation
it will you to understand clearly about this topic in LIV.

Subsequent debit and Credit in MRIO

Hi,
I know the Invocie and credit memo in MIRO when we are posting the invocie we have to use the invocie option and in case we return the material we can use the credit memo, I wan tto know when we have to use subsequent debit / credit what its exact use.
regards,
zafar

Hi,
Subsequent debit and Credit are executed after invoice verification. When an additional invoice or credit memo is received for a transaction that has already been invoiced, this is known as a subsequent debit/credit. First let me clarify the terms Subsequent debit /Credit and credit memo.
1. Subsequent Debit :-You must enter an invoice as a subsequent debit if a purchase order item has already been invoiced and further costs are now incurred. (Example: A vendor has inadvertently invoiced you at too low a price and then sends a
second invoice for the difference.)
2. Subsequent Credit :- You must enter a credit memo as a subsequent credit if a purchase order item was invoiced at too high a price and you have now received a credit memo. (Example: A vendor has inadvertently invoiced you at too high a price and then sends a credit memo for the difference. Please refer below link for better clarity.
A subsequent debit/credit cannot refer to a particular invoice. Subsequent debits and credits are listed separately in the PO history.
3. Credit Memo :- You usually receive a credit memo from a vendor if you were overcharged. As is the case for invoices, credit memos refer to purchase orders or goods receipts. Hope this will resolve your issue. Thanking you

Pls. give some suggestion on Subsequent Credit and debit note?

Dear Gurus,
Pls. give some suggestion on Subsequent Credit and debit note?
Regrds
Shikha

Hi Sikha
We generaly use subsequent debit / credit to adjust invoice value without affecting Qty
Pls check notes supplied by SAP
A subsequent debit/credit arises if a transaction has already been settled, and a further invoice or credit memo is received afterwards.
A subsequent debit/credit changes the total invoice value of a purchase order item; the total invoice quantity remains unchanged. Therefore, only a value-based update of the purchasing transaction takes place. There is no quantity-based update.
You must enter an invoice as a subsequent debit if a purchase order item has already been invoiced and further costs are incurred. (Example: A vendor has inadvertently invoiced you at too low a price and then sends a second invoice for the difference.)
You must enter a credit memo as a subsequent credit if a purchase order item was invoiced at too high a price and now you have received a credit memo. (Example: A vendor has inadvertently invoiced you at too high a price and then sends a credit memo for the difference.)
If you enter a subsequent debit/credit, the system suggests the entire invoiced quantity, but no value. The maximum quantity that you can subsequently debit or credit is the quantity that has already been invoiced.
You can only enter a subsequent debit/credit for a purchase order item if an invoice has already been posted for that item.
A subsequent debit/credit cannot refer to a particular invoice.
Subsequent debits and credits are listed separately in the PO history
Typical example is like
suppose vendor has overcharged u for perticular PO and afterward he want to correct it
In such scenario u can post subsequent debit to correct PO without affecting Qty. field
<b>Reward if usefull</b>
Vishal..

Credit memo, subsequent debit and subsequent credit

Hi,
We have recently started using credit memo, subsequent debit and subsequent credit in SAP.
However, when ever user is taking print of this documents system is still showing as invoice verification note only
We want to differentiate this documents with other document types. could u plz explain me the config settings for this doc types provided by standard SAP.

Transaction OBA7, define document types which you require. Then, SPRO -> AR/AP -> Business transactions -> Outgoing invoices, credit memos -> Outgoing Invoices/Credit Memos - Enjoy -> Define Document Types for Enjoy Transactions. There you can define that new document types are default for process you want
regards

Difference between Adaptive webservice and deprecated one

Hi Experts,
Plz anyone tell me the exact differences between Adaptive web service model and deprecated model.
Also plz explain how an adaptive web service is working.
Thanks in advance,
john

Hi John
In old webservice No support to import URL which requires authentication but in adaptive web service
Allows importing WSDL through URL which requires authentication
In old web service Logical Ports are available at design time
In adaptive web service Logical Ports are not available at design time
In old web service No direct support for nested structure, thus application programmer has to manually bind the
In adaptive web service Direct support of nested structure , no such manual binding is required
These are the diffreense between old web service and adaptive web service
Regards
Ruturaj

Difference between Subsequent credit and Credit memo

Hi,
Please tell me what is differnece between Subsequent credit and Credit memo.
You shoud give me on business exmple
Thanks and Regards
Anil Patil

Hi Anil,
For CREDIT MEMO
A Credit Memo (short for "credit memorandum") is a commercial document issued by a seller to a buyer, listing the products, quantities and agreed prices for products or services the seller provided the buyer, but the buyer did not receive or returned. It may be issued in the case of damaged goods, errors or allowances. In respect of the previously issued invoice, a Credit Memo will reduce or eliminate the amount the buyer has to pay.
The Credit Memo usually contains: PO #, Date, Billing Address, Shipping Address, Terms of Payment, List of products with quantities and prices. Usually it references the original Invoice and sometimes states the reason for issue.
Credit Memos are often called Credit Notes or just Credits.
The seller usually issues a Credit Memo for the same or lower amount than the invoice, and then repays the money to the buyer or sets it off against a balance due from other transactions.
The term may also refer to the document provided by a bank to a depositor to indicate the depositor's balance is being increased because of an event other than a deposit, such as the collection by the bank of the depositor's note receivable.
SAP Difference between Credit memo and subsequent debits/credits
Subsequent Debits/Credits are used in cases where the quantity is in the original invoice is to remain the same.
Example:
PO 10 - $10
GR 10 - $10
LIV 10 - $11 (Logistics Invoice Verification)
The vendor invoice is more than that in the Purchase Order.
In order to correct, the Vendor may send in another invoice for the Increased amount
or a credit memo for the reduce amount.
If you approve of the price increase,
post the subsequent invoice received as a Subsequent Debit Invoice.
If it is a credit memo that has been received for reducing $1 of invoice price,
then post the credit memo as Subsequent Credit.
This would retain the quantity but reduce the amount.
Subsequent Debit/Credit is for the case when the credit is not for the full amount
eg. if the Vendor decided to credit & only the $1 overcharged.
Credit memo is for the credit of the full amount and value.
Regards,
VB

Difference between subsequent adjustment and return delivery ...?

Dear all ,
Provide difference between subsequent adjustment and return delivery ...?
sri....

Hi,
Subsequent delivery means you have to reverse the goods receipts after
entering corresponding invoice and you want to post another goods receipt
than use subsequent delivery in MIGO with reference to old goods receipt
number.
Subsequent adjustment means updating the price difference in the quantity
already supplied.
Ex: Original invoice price is 100 for quantity of
10 nou2019s, i.e., Invoice amount is 1000 after doing MIRO for amount
1000 you get another supplementary Invoice for amount
100 towards price revision. In this case you have to adjust through subsequent
adjustment.
If your question was on posting logic for alternative posting of exchange rate differences. then,
Subsequent adjustment*
When you make a subsequent adjustment, the system posts all values with the exchange rate at the time of the goods receipt.
Return Delivery
If there is a return delivery, the posting date is based on the time of the goods receipts. The system converts the stock value using the average exchange rate with reference to the purchase order.
Regards,
Sadiq.

Subsequent/Cr and Dr

Good morning experts:-
1. what is the Subsequent Cr ( credite) and Subsequent Dr (debite)
I requsted to both of the I want any example for my clarrification,

Hello,
Subsequent debit and credit note means that A transaction that reduces Amounts Payable from a vendor is called debit memo. Ex: you send damaged goods back to your vendor.
Vendor A/c Dr
To Prices diff A/c or Material diff A/c
Credit Note: A transaction that reduces Amounts Receivable from a customer is called credit memo. Ex: Sales returns, Additional discounts etc.,
Prices diff A/c or Material diff A/c Dr
To Customer A/c
Ex: You have recd an GR worth of 100 qty@10/- but IR recd around 90 qty@10/-. In this case you have to be recd subsequent IR 10qty@10/-
Thanks
Para

Adobe Configurator and deprecated Flash-based panel support in Adobe CC products

Does Configurator 4.0 (or Configurator 3) support the creation of HTML5-based panels?
I received the following email from Adobe:
Photoshop CC, starting in the middle of 2014, will remove support for Flash-based extensions. All other Creative Cloud products have already marked Flash-based panel support as deprecated at this time, meaning no future enhancements or bug fixes will be coming for Flash-based extensions.
The current version of Photoshop CC already includes support for a new type of HTML5 based panel. We are currently working on a new version of Adobe Extension Builder designed specifically to support the creation of these HTML5 based panels. You can download a free preview here: http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/extensionbuilder3/.
Details about developing HTML5 extensions for Photoshop as well as for other Creative Cloud products are available in the Extension Builder pre-release program here: https://adobeformscentral.com/?f=6V6IgvE0yLQQ7bgadxNXaw . You can also join the Photoshop developers' prerelease program for details specific to Photoshop. If you're interested, please let me know and I will get you setup.
Will the panels created by Configurator 4.0 work in PS CC after the middle of 2014 when support for Flash-based extensions is removed from Photoshop CC? For that matter, will the panels created in Configurator 3.0 work in PS CC after the middle of 2014?

I've carefully read all the posts here and would like to give my feedback on the whole question. I'm a professional retoucher and a teacher as well, and during my professional carrer I've built dozens of panels.
I do really take advantage of boosting my productivity with any customized panel, as automation is something that adds speed, reliability and dramatically reduce errors during repetitive tasks. Therefore, I can't live without it.
Now, I understand why Adobe wants to move towards HTML 5, but please give us the ability to keep our work at the same level of efficiency we currently have. Photoshop is not for amateurs, it's a professional software. And professionals must keep their productivity, for sure they can't afford any loss of it, especially in these times!
Moving from Flash to HTML 5 means rebuilding all the existing panels from scratch: how much this will cost to us in terms of time (and money) if we could have an HTML 5 version of Configurator? And how much, if we don't have a tool like Configurator at all? Three times, ten times as much? Maybe Adobe knows the answer, not me, I'm not a coder. But I'd like to know this answer.
Further, picture this: I've taught several classes for at least five intercontinental companies on how to build actions and organize them into panels for improving their productivity. Every time the response was the same: BOOM!
They had a huge speed improvement in their daily workflows, and started to build dozens of panels by themselves for any possibile use. It was like opening a Pandora's box for them (their words).
Every one who attended my classes, have taught the same topic inside their company and the reaction was always the same. So now, in every company in which I've taught building panels and actions, there are hundreds of panels for many different uses, all over the world. Of course, as 100% of them were specifically built for internal use, they shared the panels among them, but not outside their company.
Many of them who are now mid-advanced users, have written to me asking how they could keep their panels working correctly in the next CC version of Photoshop. I have no solution for them, unless many of them become coders. That's a bad answer, I must admit, but no way out right now.
Their reply to me was very straight: "well, we won't upgrade any copy of Photoshop until we can keep our panels working correctly for sure. For us is much more important being productive and efficient than upgrading to the latest version, if this means to lower our performance, no doubt."
Adobe wanted to integrate all their softwares into the Creative Cloud. So far so good, I'm for it. But when you decide to integrate everything saying to the world that "it's for the sake of a better productivity", then you must really integrate them. Otherwise people will think that it was only a commercial move. So why we can't build panels for the applications inside Muse, for example? It was introduced to allow people to build websites quickly and efficiently using HTML 5, taking care about the layout instead of investing too much time in coding.
Exactly what Configurator allowed to do. Focus on the result with minimal time cost, aka money cost.
World is running faster, therefore we need to work faster too. And without Configurator we won't. I can't disagree with all the people that won't upgrade Photoshop, if this means that they'll work slower because they can't use their panels carefully made by themselves. Photoshop is a tool for producing ideas and other nice stuff, like any software. The faster it is, the most people will like it, the better will sold. A simple truth. Think about what happened to Apple Finalcut ProX and how many users switched to Premiere. Photoshop has no competitors except new versions of itself.
And this does not apply only the CC users. Look at the bigger picture: how many users still using CS6 with all their fully working panels won't upgrade to CC if they know they'll reduce their productivity?
Think about the answer. Carefully.

Subsequent delivery and subsequent debit

Dear All,
material type: NLAG
account assignemnt (PO): cost center, non valuated GR
Scenario:
1. GR (MIGO) - material_document1, qty 100
2. IR (MIRO) - invoice1 for material_document1, qty 100
> vendor makes correction because qty is more or less than the original
3. GR (MIGO) - material document2 - qty 20 (sum qty for PO item is 120)
4. IR (MIRO) - subsequent_debit1 for 20 pcs
These connections / links should exist:
Material_document1 - invoice1
Material_docuemt2 - subsequent_debit1
My question
How can I solve this? Is it posible to book the subsequent debit with reference to material_docuement2?
If I create the subsequent invoice it is valid only for material_document1 EVEN IF I do material_document2 as SUBSEQUENT DELIVERY in MIGO (in this case the two material documents are connected). SAP expects an additional invoice for material_document2 (but it is linked to material_docuement1!).
In my opinion it cannot be solved since the debit/credit memo refers to the "original" material document (1) and invoice (1).
Thanks,
Csaba
My question was a little bit incoherent...
I wanted SAP to suggest the to-be-credited qty&value automatically in case of returns to vendor - but it's not possible in standard system as per my best knowledge .
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Mar 4, 2009 9:18 PM
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Mar 4, 2009 9:22 PM

Hi Bala krishnan,
when there is a price difference this entry would takes place. while reversing the same should be reversed, in your case the system is posting to another account.
please check the account key against the wrong line item ( this you can see with the help of changing layout), then goto OBYC and check the gl accounts assigned against that. To check either it is right or wrong compare with the standard/default company codes settings i.e 0001 co.cd.
Thanks & Regards,
Shashi Kanth.

Obsolete and deprecated parameters

Hi,
we got the error when i start the istance.
SQL> STARTUP
ORA-32004: obsolete and/or deprecated parameter(s) specified
ORACLE instance started.
Total System Global Area 167772160 bytes
Fixed Size 1247900 bytes
Variable Size 75498852 bytes
Database Buffers 88080384 bytes
Redo Buffers 2945024 bytes
Database mounted.
Database opened.
How to find which parameters are obsolete and/or deprecated?

user3266490 wrote:
Hi,
we got the error when i start the istance.
SQL> STARTUP
ORA-32004: obsolete and/or deprecated parameter(s) specified
ORACLE instance started.
Total System Global Area 167772160 bytes
Fixed Size 1247900 bytes
Variable Size 75498852 bytes
Database Buffers 88080384 bytes
Redo Buffers 2945024 bytes
Database mounted.
Database opened.
How to find which parameters are obsolete and/or deprecated?Hi
Check
http://azardba.blogspot.com/2009/08/ora-32004-obsolete-andor-deprecated.html
Regards
Azar
DBA

ParticipantStepChooser implementation: WorkItem#getCurrentAssignee and deprecated API?

I'm currently implementing various workflow steps. When working on the ParticipantStepChooser implementation, i wonder why assignment of the next workflow step is not reflected in the WorkItem#getCurrentAssignee.
Also, various classes from com.day.cq.security are declared as deprecated, like Authorizable, Group and User. Now, those are some very "interessting" types, which are more then central. How can i access the new types easily and when ill the association be fixed?
Kind regards and thanx in advance.

one of the workaround is by adding -XX:-UseSplitVerifier option to the JVM .This issue seems to be an with CQ 5.6 and java 7

Subsequent acquistion and deprecation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for