Supplier collaboration with SNC

Hi Gurus,
We intend to use Supplier collaboration with SNC, where plant will share component plan with supplier and supplier will comeback with constrained component plan and based on which plant will modify production plan.
These are the steps we have done:-
1) Created BP as Organization for Plant and Supplier
2) Created BP as person and assigned to plant and supplier respectively
3) Extended product to the supplier and created TLane
4) We are able to login into web portal for supplier view with login and password maintained.
issue are:-
1) We understand that, component forecast will come from APO and it will come to as demand. If we see Demand Tab and look at Order Forecast Monitor - > Order forecast details, it asks for selection of SKU and Location. If we select our SKU and vendor Location created, it says Invalid Selection......Not sure if we have missed anything.
2) When vendor will confirm the plan, which key figure he will modify?? which Tab we have to refer.
Any help will be appreciated.
thanks,
jaideep

Hi Gurus,
Yes, the OSS helps and we are able to see product location in the Order Forecast details screen.
We are checking Key figure " Supplier Planned Receipt" which supplier will use to modify his plan against customer requirement.
Wondering this key figure is Non Editable for our case....then how supplier will enter his constraint plan?? Any help
Are we missing any customization to make key figures editable/non editable like Planning Book in standard APO?? plz help

Similar Messages

Supplier collaboration with contract management

Hi All,
is there any functionality available in SRM to allow collaboration with suppliers for the contract management functionality within SRM?
I thinking of any possible integration via SUS?
Cheers
Chris

Hello Chris,
Use of cFolders can be one of the option, which version you are working on.
SRM supports integration with SAP Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) cFolders 2.0 or higher. Once SAP PLM cFolders has been installed, purchasers can create a folder there to store information and share it with potential suppliers.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm2007/helpdata/en/74/344c430fab4d0bbc30996d56cc293a/frameset.htm
Hope this might be helpful.
Thanks
Ashutosh

Supplier Collaboration with SRM Bidding Engine

Hi All,
I'm looking at the SAP BIdding Engine with regards to supplier collaboration in the bidding process, my undertsanding is that SUS can be used for a single point of access for suppliers to submit their bids. I also understand that cFolders can be used to allow true collaboration in the bidding process i.e. review of bid, submit prices etc.
I have four questions around these scenarios
1. For collaboration in the sourcing process which is superior cFolders integration or SUS?
2. What is the advantages of SUS over cFolders in the sourcing process.
3. Could you use both products?
4. Can cFolders be used to pose questions from the supplier? i.e. a true sourcing process would usually be:
RFI > Supplier Info response > RFQ > Supplier pricing response
Cheers
Chris

1. Both has diff purposes. C-folder purpose is information exchange in terms of drgs, attachments, discussion etc.
so kind of technical exchange
whereas SUS forms common window for suppliers for collaberating with buyer co. for BI they can submit the price & conditions.
So kind of commercial exchange.
Superiority depends on the perspective
2. SUS you can use for odercollaberation also
i.e. for PO/SA from MM or EBP ,suppliers can
send responce
send ASN
post confirmation
post invoice
3. Yes
BR
Dinesh

Supplier collbration with SAP SNC

Any documentation on Supplier collbration with SAP SNC .
Thanks
Gayatri

Hi Gayatri
Same link
http://help.sap.com/bp_scmv250/BBLibrary/HTML/BBLibrary_EN_DE.htm
Regards
Vinod

Supplier Collaboration

Can you custom Supplier Collaboration?
One iView of Supplier Collaboration - Account Overview ( A WebDynpro application) - in Financial Reports the invoices are show who created the invoice and allow to suppliers to drill down and send a mail to them.....this link to email needs to be hidden.
How can we edit it that?

Hi Jaspinder,
As per ur last mail query.
The Supplier Collaboration and Supplier Registration these two scenarios are comes in the picture when ur talking with Supplier or involving Supplier for the decision making process.
1) For Supplier Collaboration we need to configure PDP with SI and Service Procurement and CCM.
2) For Supplier Registration comes under Strategic Sourcing scenario.
You will get the configuration guide for the same at the Service market place.
Please award the points if it helps u in resolving the issue.
BR,
Vijay Mittal

Supplier collaboration and Supplier registration

Hello ,
Has any worked on supplier collaboration and Supplier registration scenarios .
I need some documents on the above topics.
It would be of great help if some one could send these documents on this .
Regards
Jassi

Hi Jaspinder,
As per ur last mail query.
The Supplier Collaboration and Supplier Registration these two scenarios are comes in the picture when ur talking with Supplier or involving Supplier for the decision making process.
1) For Supplier Collaboration we need to configure PDP with SI and Service Procurement and CCM.
2) For Supplier Registration comes under Strategic Sourcing scenario.
You will get the configuration guide for the same at the Service market place.
Please award the points if it helps u in resolving the issue.
BR,
Vijay Mittal

Planner role in Supplier Collaboration 4.0 (SRM 7.0)

Hi Experts,
I noticed, in SRM 7.0 supplier collaboration, we have a Planner (Supplier) role. This role gives access to 'Material Monitoring' area, where in Planner can lookup up-to-date stock inview and also can view inventory and planning information from ECC. Does anyone know the purpose of this function? What screens in ECC are they being extracted from? It appears these are Java Webdynpro IViews pre-delivered.
Thanks,
SG

Dear John,
Currently my client is upgrading from SRM 4.0 to SRM 7.0.
The following activities were performed along with the list as mentioned by you.
1. The business partner migration from time independent scenario in 4.0 to time dependent scenario in 7.0. The existing BPs in SRM 4.0 need to be migrated using TD_SWITCH report. Please refer note 1077616, 1228662, 810634 for more details.
2. FM BBP_USER_GET_ATTRIBUTES has become obsolette in SRM 7.0. Alternative FM is BBP_GET_ATTRIBUTES_AT03.
3. To migrate existing vendors from 4.0 to 7.0, report BBP_XPRA_ORGEH_TO_VENDOR_GROUP need to be run in SRM 7.0.
Hope this helps.
Thanks & Regards,
Aswini

JCO connection to SRM system - in Supplier collaboration 2.0 BP

Hi Friends,
We have deployed the Supplier Collaboration 2.0 Business Package on SAP Enterprise Portal 7.
After deployed, we need to configure the JCO to SRM System. We are not configuring for catalog, IHS, et.
Now, Under the 'Supplier Portal Administration'->'System Integration' Workset, There are 4 iViews which talks about the JCO, Integration to BP.
1. JCO Client Maintanance
2. External JCO connection configuration
3. Application maintenance
4. System type configuration
I searched for documentation in tthe sap.help.com, sdn, service.sap.com but nowhere anyone mentioned the step-by-step details.
Could anyone please let me know how integrate Backend to BP of Supplier Collaboration 2.0 with JCO's using the BP iViews.
Thanks for your time.
Thanks,
Raghavendra Pothula

Hi all,
Please advise if any of you managed to resolve your query? Im busy with Supplier Collaboration 4.0 BP u2013 and am completely new to the portal area. Would appreciate any advice? I went through the SAP documentation (http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm70/helpdata/en/55/c88265d15b4f0f9ee1653bc1146414/content.htm). So I was currently trying to set up RFC users for the systems, but not sure if Im on the right track. Would you be able to advise?
Thanks,
Emily

SAP GUI with SNC logon and Hummingbird Exceed - SAP GUI window size issue

We have discovered an issue when SAP GUI 7.10 is used to logon via SNC and Hummingbird Exceed is used on the same workstation to logon to a UNIX system either via x-windows or telnet.
When the user logs onto a UNIX system using Hummingbird Exceed, then uses SAP GUI to logon to a SAP system with SNC authentication, the SAP GUI authentication works, but the favourites list is not fully displayed and has to be resized before any of the entries are available.
Has anybody else seen this issue, and do they know if there is a fix available ? We wondered if there might be an issue with fonts or some other sort of conflict between Exceed and SAP GUI, but it is strange that the problem only occurs if SNC authentication is being used, and when userid+password is used to logon to SAP the problem does not occur.
Cheers,
Tim

Hello Tim and Wolfgang,
I was curious too as I found it interesting... so I tested a few combinations, but could not reproduce what Tim has described, at least not before my CPU reached 100% and the applications stopped responding (~2GHz processor, 1GB RAM, 48 kbps connection, latency ~ 2 x width of the Pacific Ocean, but Backend 7.00!).
However I did notice some indications which might be a help (based on 7.00!):
Back in 4.?? there was a problem in that large menus could not be searched(!). Sorry, I don't have access to SAP now, but from memory the note # was 444043 (or very similar) and introduced a form routine for large menus - from a printscreen I still have the message number which led me to the note - 'I476(S#)'.
The system certainly distinguishes between MENU_TYPEs and the above note corrections could be found in several locations relating to the SAP menu 'S', the role menu 'A' etc, but I could only see that for favourites 'F' this is implemented for the menu search (when searching, not when loading).
@ Tim: Ask you customer to create a favourites menu which only has 1 node or max 2 (certainly not more than 4!) and ~ 20 executable objects in it (not more than 30!)? Can they under any conditions achieve the described problem with such a menu?
If not possible to reproduce, then the closest I could guess is a maximum limit of 4 nodes and max 30 objects for a 'F'avourite menu, before it is a minimum candidate for "performance problems" and consideration to be converted to a role ('A'ctivity group) menu instead.
Sorry that I can only help by speculating, because I could not reproduce what you have described.
Hopefully this problem will not happen to me in the New Year, and hope you will solve it for the rest of the year
Cheers,
Julius
Updated memory (not RAM) by: Julius Bussche on Jan 3, 2008 9:07 AM

Collaboration with vendor via Portal?

Hi everyone :
   I meet a problem about collaboration with vendor. Our customer has lots of vendor ,and our customer expect that their vendor could query related R/3 report real-time via Portal on Internet .
   I had done the SSO between Portal and R/3, and the user who had Portal user and R/3 both could access R/3 via Portal easily. We can create user for vendor in Portal easily, but it is impossible that we create user for all of vendors in R/3 , because of R/3 user need to pay for license. So vendors could not query R/3 report via Portal now .
    My problem :
    1. Vendors can't query R/3 report via Portal now.
Is there anyone met this problem ever , and How to solve this problem ?
    2.On the assumption that our vendor can query R/3 report via Portal now, how can we control the authorization that certain vendor could query his data only, can't query other vendor's data ?
    Any advice and discuss is welcome!
Best Regards,
Jianguo Chen
Message was edited by: jianguo chen
Message was edited by: jianguo chen

Hi Brian
which datasource u r using?
i think u used read only LDAP + Databse
when u chang the password for user in portal than after corresponding user password in LDAP directory are not changed thas't why it's generated a message that
password expires and u can't change the password
so try to change the password in LDAP also.
hope it's helps u.
regards,
kaushal

"Invoice History Report "show wrong balance for supplier invoice with USD

Invoice History Report show wrong balance for supplier invoice with USD Currency
After I run this report i see in the last of this report there is difference between the supplier total
USD (Currency ) and the open Balance USD , it is decreased the open balance
for supplier with 2300 USD with out any reasons
bellow is some data copy of the report
======================================================
Supplier Site Total: SAR 34,700.00
Supplier Site Total: USD 39,000.00
Supplier Total: SAR 34,700.00
Supplier Total: USD 39,000.00
Open Balance: SAR 34,700.00
Open Balance: USD 36,700.00
*** End of Report ***
==============================================
please advise me from where can this differenc ( 39000 - 36,700=2300 )COMMING
or it is bug in this report , becuase i compare this report with other report in account payable like
-supplier open balance letter
-invoice register report
-invoice aging report
all this report give me the amount for supplier USD =39000
BUT AGIN FROM WHERE THE SYSTEM DECREASED THE AMOUNT TO 36,700
thanks

Can you try running Create Accounting For payments just before you run the Invoice History Report and re-check .
Thanks

HT5219 I have a macbook air (mid 2012) and a thunderbolt display. Do I absolutely need to connect the power supply together with the thunderbolt cable ? I found that the screen won't wake up if only the thunderbolt connection is plugged.

I have a macbook air (mid 2012) and a thunderbolt display (27'').
Do I absolutely need to connect the power supply together with the thunderbolt cable ?
I found that the screen won't wake up if only the thunderbolt connection is plugged. Is this normal ?

I just got my ATD and late 2011 MBP up and running. I've not tried running without the power adapter from the ATD plugged in, but I just tried and didn't have any problems with the display not waking. You may want to take your query to the ATD forum - https://discussions.apple.com/community/peripherals/thunderbolt_display - perhaps someone there has experienced a similar issue.
Good luck,
Clinton

Problem with SNC logon to Analyzer

Hi friends
We configure SNC for BW system logon. It works fine for GUI. But when we use Analyzer the problem occurs:
Ｍｉｓｓｉｎｇ　ＳＮＣ＿ＬＩＢ＝IN CONNECT_PARAM IN RfcOpenEx
Why this happen?
we have done the checking:
existence of Kerberos dll in /windows/system32
active directory settings for a SAPServiceSID user
advance setting in saplogon
It looks fine. Do we miss sth? Maybe there's some configuration for Analyzer? Thank you very much.

We were attempting standard publishing configuration but it would not work until SNC was installed. Once installed the publishing worked. But that's when the authentication issues started.
We can login to infoview with SAP credientials no problem. But with the SNC turned on in BOBJ, its as if that first login means nothing. If you attempt to execute a report it shows cached paramaters and is apparently not authenticating against our SAP backend system. When you turn the SNC off via the CMC in BOBJ, the reports execute correctly authenticating against SAP backend.
With SNC on, if you try to execute a report, nothing happens. As mentioned above, it's as if it's not communicating with the backend data source. With SNC off, all works well but we just can't do the publishing/bursting.
Thanks again,
Sage

Document Collaboration with In-Place Editing Activity Type

Hello,
My client needs to use the Document Collaboration with In-Place Editing Activity Type.
He currently uses the Microsoft Office 2000 but unfortunately this version triggers an error.
what are Microsoft Office versions that support this functionality?
Would you please proveide me an official list to give to him?
I could only find the following passage of the NPD pdf documentation:
"...Note that Office 2007 extensions are not supported with NPD
in-place editing...
Thanks and regards
Daniele Domenicucci

I would actually be curious to know what version most customers are using. 2000 is now 4 releases behind the current, and soon to be 5.
Although I think Office 2000 should technically work, it was also the first release with a built-in webDAV client, there might be some additional configuration to get it to work. maybe some digging on the microsoft support site regarding webdav and Office 2000. But, I also think it's a question of support b/w Office and WebDAV; not Office and PLM4P.
Instead, I would recommend using a newer release of Office to avoid this issue, altogether.

Supplier Qualification with ERP

Dear experts,
I've set up the supplier qualification process. So fas so good.
I'm able to accept a supplier in "Supplier Preselection"
I want to transfer this supplier to the ECC system next but the transaction to do so is not there.
I have assigned the Role: /SAPSRM/SUS_ROS_PROCESSOR to my user and I can only see the transaction Pre-Select Supplier
According to the documentation the following transactions should be included to the workset for this role:
Transfer Supplier
Preselect Suppliers
Supplier Monitor
But I can not see the transactions Transfer Supplier and Supplier Monitor.
Am I missing something?

Hello Nikhil,
Thanks for your reply.
The Strategic Purchaser role is also assigned.
I may be wrong but isn't the scenario you are describing Supplier Qualification with SRM server?
Look at the following link. There you can see a second scenario called Supplier Qualification with ERP.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm70/helpdata/en/45/efc057348a3112e10000000a1553f7/content.htm
THat scenario describes a process where you can transfer the supplier manually to the ERP system through XI.
Indeed there is a new functionality in EhP1 to automatically transfer the accepted supplier to ECC.
Also check http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm70/helpdata/en/f4/1b962bda07450b9076bb66a7d42fa7/frameset.htm
Here you can see the worksets for this role.
I'm a bit confused and hope you can help me out.
Kind regards

Supplier collaboration with SNC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for