Support for AMD Llano APU

I recently built a new computer to serve as a fileserver and media station. As such, it has tons of hard drives, and just barely enough graphics to play HD video. The important aspects (as far as I know) are as follows:
Processor and graphics: AMD A4-3400 Llano APU
OS: plain-old vanilla Arch on kernel 3.3.7-1, x86_64 (all packages up to date as well)
Bootloader: syslinux
Desktop: SLIM into Xmonad
Here's the problem:
During initial setup, I kept running into a problem where, during the boot process, as soon as it hit the point where it started loading X, my monitor would just go black and everything would be completely uninteractable. After some digging around, I figured out that I needed to add "nomodeset" to my kernel line. As such, my syslinux.cfg file has an entry as follows:
MENU LABEL Arch Linux
LINUX ../vmlinuz-linx
APPEND root=/dev/disk/by-uuid/<snip> ro
INITRD ../initramfs-linux.img nomodeset
This works. So far, so good. However, it does have a problem -- I'm not able to correctly autodetect the resolution/aspect ratio of the monitor the computer is connected to. As such, I get rather terrible stretching and squishing whenever I hook up to, say, a 16:9 monitor. To rectify this, I tried using xrandr to manually add and set the proper resolution (as described at https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Xr … solutions). However, every time I try to do this I get some errors:
> xrandr --newmode "1280x1024_60.00"  109.00  1280 1368 1496 1712  1024 1027 1034 1063 -hsync +vsync
xrandr: Failed to get size of gamma for output default
> xrandr --addmode default "1280x1024_60.00"
xrandr: Failed to get size of gamma for output default
> xrandr --output default --mode "1280x1024_60.00"
xrandr: Failed to get size of gamma for output default
xrandr: Configure crtc 0 failed
Again, after some googling and digging I found this page (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ATI) which explains all about the drivers I should be using. My first thought was that I didn't have the right drivers installed -- wrong, I've got xf86-video-ati. I followed all the instructions on that page regarding setting up KMS properly... and one of the instructions says to make sure you remove "nomodeset" from the kernel line. Well, fine, I did that. And now I'm back where I started.
TL;DR: I have been unable to find any instructions that will let me both a) have anything display at all (what I was getting via nomodeset) and b) properly load and take advantage of the graphics drivers (what I assume the ATI instructions would have let me do).
Any advice, tips, or other places to look?
Thanks,
Phas

Here is the long and short of it.
This bug is in the kernel.
The bug is not fixed in 3.4
The bug may be fixed in 3.5 but it is not listed in the drm pull list.  Apparently they fixed the bug around 5/27 and it may or may not have made it into the final pull list.
This bug concerns the D-sub port.  If you do not use the D-sub connection you can disable it with a kernel opiton.  This should fix the problem.
If you are using the D-sub port then the bug should be "fixed" in the current kernel if you have no other video conections.  If you are using more then 1 video connection then you are currently screwed.  The D-sub port currently does not work with other active video ports in linux or at least not the framebuffer.  X does work over both D-sub and DVI/HDMI at the same time.
To disable the D-sub port look in /sys/class/drm/card0 for the name of the D-sub port.  It should be card0-VGA-1.  Add the line video=VGA-1:d to the append line in syslinux.cfg.
This is what I have been able to piece together from various bug reports/workarounds on the net, and my own experience with the bug.  I stronly suggest you add a line to the append line that either enables (:e) or disables(:d) the VGA port no matter what you do since this greatly speeds up the kernel boot time.  Mine went from 6.5 seconds to 1.5 seconds when I did this.

Similar Messages

  • Does arch support for amd 780g matherboard?

    does arch support for amd 780g matherboard?
    3 days ago, I installed the arch 2007.08.02, and I update the system up to date. I installed the xorg, ati driver, gdm, and gnome, but my 22" SAMSUNG LCD displayed error (display the desktop but the colors all wrong, can't see anything clearly), then I downloaded the ati catalyst install package ,  and installed it, the error occured too, so I came here to ask you
    how to deal with it?
    the video card of the matherboard  is radeon hd3200.
    Last edited by xmfs (2008-04-24 03:26:47)

    Sorry for taking this long to reply, I was out of town.
    I finally got it working with the latest catalyst. Video and everything. I am posting my xorg in case anyone finds it helpfull. I haven't done any tweaks and it is far from complete but it is working as base project.
    Section "ServerLayout"
            Identifier     "X.org Configured"
            Screen      0  "aticonfig-Screen[0]" 0 0
            InputDevice    "Mouse0" "CorePointer"
            InputDevice    "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
    EndSection
    Section "Files"
            RgbPath      "/usr/share/X11/rgb"
            ModulePath   "/usr/lib/xorg/modules"
            FontPath     "/usr/share/fonts/misc"
            FontPath     "/usr/share/fonts/100dpi:unscaled"
            FontPath     "/usr/share/fonts/75dpi:unscaled"
            FontPath     "/usr/share/fonts/TTF"
            FontPath     "/usr/share/fonts/Type1"
    EndSection
    Section "Module"
            Load  "GLcore"
            Load  "xtrap"
            Load  "glx"
            Load  "dbe"
            Load  "extmod"
            Load  "record"
            Load  "dri"
            Load  "freetype"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
            Identifier  "Keyboard0"
            Driver      "kbd"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
            Identifier  "Mouse0"
            Driver      "mouse"
            Option      "Protocol" "auto"
            Option      "Device" "/dev/input/mouse1"
            Option      "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7"
    EndSection
    Section "Monitor"
            Identifier   "aticonfig-Monitor[0]"
            Option      "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
            Option      "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
            Option      "DPMS" "true"
            DisplaySize 518 324
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
            Identifier  "aticonfig-Device[0]"
            Driver      "fglrx"
    EndSection
    Section "Screen"
            Identifier "aticonfig-Screen[0]"
            Device     "aticonfig-Device[0]"
            Monitor    "aticonfig-Monitor[0]"
            DefaultDepth     24
            SubSection "Display"
                    Viewport   0 0
                    Depth     24
                    Modes "1920x1200"
            EndSubSection
    EndSection
    Section "DRI"
            Mode         0666
    EndSection

  • TRIM Support for AMD sb850

    Hi all,
    I've just bought an OCZ Octane 128GB SSD, formatted nad created an ext4 partition to host my root filesystem.
    When I try to enable TRIM support for root filesystem (putting the discard in mount options) I get the following errors in dmesg
    failed command: DATA SET MANAGEMENT
    I've a Gigabyte GA-870A-UDE rev2 motherboard, the SSD is attached to one of the sata3 ports (managed by the SB850 Southbridge)
    Any Ideas?
    Thanks
    Luca

    Technically, TRIM is not supported by Lion for non-Apple-branded SSDs, but there is a work around for this.
    The procedure described here worked beautifully for me: http://digitaldj.net/2011/07/21/trim-enabler-for-lion/

  • Multi Core Support for AMD 1100T

    I've read through the lists, and I suppose my answer is going to be "it depends", but as you can see from the attached two pics, it looks like Audition is only using 1 of my 6 physical cores.  Every time I look, there's really only one core doing much of anything (and it is the same core) - whether it is handling plugins, exporting/rendering, etc...  Is my answer "it depends on what you're doing"?

    I can't see the core utilisation from these graphs; all the processor information is rolled into the top one. All I can tell from this is that you are using 19% of 6 cores, which sounds about right for what you are doing.
    By and large, no software will use all of the cores - you tend to need at least one dedicated to keeping the computer itself running!

  • MSI FM2-A75IA-E53 and support for AMD (Trinity) Athlon X4 750K

    Hi I just installed everything and notice the Windows bios tool was reading 255c. came to this forum and read threads with the similar issue. someone chimed in on most stating X board only support chips at 95w and the bogus temp readouts is a safe guard. Which make sense to me as I've use hw monitor to confirm the correct temperature. So i bought this chip as it was listed as a supported chip on their specs page. This cpu runs at 100w but they are also running on bios 1.3 which this MB came stock at 1.0/1.1 . So my question if i update to 1.3 will this chip be legitimately supported with all the normal read out or do i try and return the board or the chip?  dont even know what the return policy is on open parts i've just installed everything.
    thanks

    The board's very max supported load ability is 95w TDP. Anything above will cause the board faking overheating to start throtteling which makes the board survive. The faking overheating is the 255°C reading. No bios will change that. That's at least better than the alternative as the board's vrms might burn otherwise.

  • Enable amd v support for G505S

    How to enable AMD-V  support for G505s Support .. It has A8 5550M Procesor that support AMD-V...Not able to find tht option in BIOS settings?

    Hey Divyanshuv,
        Welcome to the forums
    I believe the AMD V settings should be in the BIOS 
    F2 -> Configuration -> AMD V (for an intel CPU its called Intel vanderpool technology) 
    keep me posted
    regards
    Lets make 2015 the year of the #DO
    Did I or someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!

  • Trinity & Llano APU

    my laptops current processor is the amd a6 3420m Llano APU and im wondering if I can swap that out for a a8-4500m Trinity processor...now the Llano I have is the K10 architecture, and the trinity has the Bulldozer architecture...would that play a role in this? also the trinity is a FS1r2 socket type and the Llano is a FS1 sooo.
    -Thank you!

    While the pin count may be the same or similar..... the micro-code, BIOS, and maybe chipset will not support the Trinity CPUs without major modification, if at all.
    Frank
    {------------ Please click the "White Kudos" Thumbs Up to say THANKS for helping.
    Please click the "Accept As Solution" on my post, if my assistance has solved your issue. ------------V
    This is a user supported forum. I am a volunteer and I don't work for HP.
    HP 15t-j100 (on loan from HP)
    HP 13 Split x2 (on loan from HP)
    HP Slate8 Pro (on loan from HP)
    HP a1632x - Windows 7, 4GB RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6450
    HP p6130y - Windows 7, 8GB RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6450
    HP p6320y - Windows 7, 8GB RAM, NVIDIA GT 240
    HP p7-1026 - Windows 7, 6GB RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6450
    HP p6787c - Windows 7, 8GB RAM, NVIDIA GT 240

  • [SOLVED] Radeon HD 6310 on AMD E350 APU

    I currently have a Raspberry PI running as a download/XBMC server with Arch Linux ARM connected to a TV through HDMI. This worked well so far, but I wanted to take some load off the RPi and bought an AMD E350 APU with an integrated Radeon HD 6310 GPU. Unfortunately, I'm not getting the video/audio out to work properly with Arch Linux x86_64.
    Here is what I have done so far (reboots between appropriate steps):
    Followed the Beginners' guide as for any other install.
    Installed alsa-utils, mesa, mesa-demos, xorg-[server, server-utils, xinit], and created a user and added the user to the "audio,video" groups.
    Installed the open source "xf86-video-ati" driver, added "radeon" to my MODULES array, found no other modesetting options, regenerated initramfs, and added a /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/20-radeon.conf file for good measure. I also added "radeon.audio=1" to my kernel parameters and regenerated the GRUB config file.
    With that setup, I tested the sound with the following:
    # aplay -l
    **** List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices ****
    card 0: Generic [HD-Audio Generic], device 3: HDMI 0 [HDMI 0]
    Subdevices: 1/1
    Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
    card 1: SB [HDA ATI SB], device 0: ALC662 rev1 Analog [ALC662 rev1 Analog]
    Subdevices: 1/1
    Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
    card 1: SB [HDA ATI SB], device 1: ALC662 rev1 Digital [ALC662 rev1 Digital]
    Subdevices: 1/1
    Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
    # aplay -D plughw:0,3 /usr/share/sounds/alsa/Front_Center.wav
    Playing WAVE '/usr/share/sounds/alsa/Front_Center.wav' : Signed 16 bit Little Endian, Rate 48000 Hz, Mono
    # speaker-test -c 2
    Playback device is default
    Stream parameters are 48000Hz, S16_LE, 2 channels
    Using 16 octaves of pink noise
    ALSA lib pcm_dmix.c:1022:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave
    Playback open error: -2,No such file or directory
    where the aplay command didn't return an error, but also did not play any sound. Note that a test to the analogue sound did in fact work.
    In addition to the sound not working, I wanted to test if the video will work with XBMC with
    # glxinfo
    Error: unable to open display
    Thinking that maybe something went wrong, I reinstalled most of the above mentioned packages to no avail, and also checked that the "radeon" module was loaded, which it was. I then uninstalled the open source driver, removed "radeon" and "radeon.audio=1" from the appropriate files and regenerated GRUB and initramfs.
    Next I decided to try the proprietary driver (reboots between appropriate steps):
    Added the Vi0l0 [xorg114] and [catalyst] repositories
    Installed xorg-related packes, catalyst-[hook, utils, libgl] and checked that "fglrx" was added and blacklisted "radeon".
    Ran "aticonfig --initial" and checked the file.
    Testing if the display works after verifying that the module loaded with lsmod:
    # fglrxinfo
    Error: unable to open display (null)
    At this point I started to doubt the drivers working with the hardware, so I booted up with a live openSUSE 13.1 USB (kernel 3.11) with the "radeon.audio=1" option enabled. Testing the display here (cropped):
    # glxinfo
    name of display: :0
    display: :0 screen: 0
    direct rendering: Yes
    seems to work fine, along with HDMI audio.
    I have then clean installed Arch again, reinstalled mesa, xorg and xf86-video-ati and re-added all the parameters and such. Also tried some random things like adding "amd64_agp" to the modules, "radeon.pcie_gen2=0" to the kernel parameters in any attempt to get it to work, but nothing has yet.
    At this point I'm stuck. Any help in getting this to work will be greatly appreciated.
    Other useful info (cropped for relevance):
    # cat /proc/asound/cards
    0 [Generic ]: HDA-Intel - HD-Audio Generic
    HD-Audio Generic at 0xfeb44000 irq 42
    1 [SB ]: HDA-Intel - HDA ATI SB
    HDA ATI SB at 0xfeb40000 irq 16
    # cat /proc/asound/modules
    0 snd_hda_intel
    1 snd_hda_intel
    # lspci
    00:00.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Family 14h Processor Root Complex
    00:01.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Wrestler [Radeon HD 6310]
    00:01.1 Audio device: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Wrestler HDMI Audio
    00:14.2 Audio device: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] SBx00 Azalia (Intel HDA) (rev 40)
    # dmesg | grep radeon
    [ 0.000000] Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-linux root=UUID=e847df24-9ec6-4d7a-8cb9-58c67334c6a5 rw quiet radeon.audio=1
    [ 0.000000] Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-linux root=UUID=e847df24-9ec6-4d7a-8cb9-58c67334c6a5 rw quiet radeon.audio=1
    [ 1.780114] [drm] radeon kernel modesetting enabled.
    [ 1.780205] fb: conflicting fb hw usage radeondrmfb vs VESA VGA - removing generic driver
    [ 1.781733] radeon 0000:00:01.0: VRAM: 384M 0x0000000000000000 - 0x0000000017FFFFFF (384M used)
    [ 1.781739] radeon 0000:00:01.0: GTT: 1024M 0x0000000018000000 - 0x0000000057FFFFFF
    [ 1.782586] [drm] radeon: 384M of VRAM memory ready
    [ 1.782589] [drm] radeon: 1024M of GTT memory ready.
    [ 1.807454] radeon 0000:00:01.0: WB enabled
    [ 1.807463] radeon 0000:00:01.0: fence driver on ring 0 use gpu addr 0x0000000018000c00 and cpu addr 0xffff8800b36bec00
    [ 1.807468] radeon 0000:00:01.0: fence driver on ring 3 use gpu addr 0x0000000018000c0c and cpu addr 0xffff8800b36bec0c
    [ 1.808256] radeon 0000:00:01.0: fence driver on ring 5 use gpu addr 0x0000000000072118 and cpu addr 0xffffc90010eb2118
    [ 1.808306] radeon 0000:00:01.0: irq 40 for MSI/MSI-X
    [ 1.808334] radeon 0000:00:01.0: radeon: using MSI.
    [ 1.808379] [drm] radeon: irq initialized.
    [ 1.946378] [drm] radeon: dpm initialized
    [ 2.025643] fbcon: radeondrmfb (fb0) is primary device
    [ 2.069485] radeon 0000:00:01.0: fb0: radeondrmfb frame buffer device
    [ 2.069490] radeon 0000:00:01.0: registered panic notifier
    [ 2.069526] [drm] Initialized radeon 2.36.0 20080528 for 0000:00:01.0 on minor 0
    Edit: Spelling and dmesg output.
    Last edited by cornelus (2014-04-04 15:17:33)

    Hello andy123, thanks for the response.
    As far as I know, I do not believe the /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/20-radeon.conf file is necessary, but I tested the system with and without it. The current contents is just
    Section "Device"
    Identifier "Radeon"
    Driver "radeon"
    EndSection
    As you mentioned, I would also prefer using the open source driver as I've often read and heard that it has better support than Catalyst.
    Regarding the groups, I did in fact test the system with and without my user being in the video and audio groups. I do not start Xserver explicitly in a desktop environment, but rather just test for an available display via glxinfo. This test works well, as XBMC does the same check to see if OpenGL support is available, will not run if it is not available and prints the same error as glxinfo. No Xorg logs are available in /var/log/, maybe because it does not even begin to start due to lack of display.
    The analogue channel is unmuted, and the default HDMI channel does not show a 'Master' or any other channel for that matter except S/PDIF. From a friend I've heard that this is correct, as the HDMI volume can not be set like this. The alsamixer UI is the same as on the openSUSE live disk, which worked fine.
    I haven't installed XBMC on the new installation again, but will do so now and see if that forces X to write some logs.

  • X2 3800+ (E6) support for the K8N Neo4 Platinum/SLI

    Hi everyone:
    I have decided to purchase the K8N Neo4 Platinum/SLI (MS-7100-020) and I ready placed the order.  However, I wonder if it supports the AMD X2 3800+ (E6 Version) CPU?  The reason I asked the question because I found the following table from the Taiwan MSI web site which shows that X2 3800+ E6 is undertesting.
    http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/mainboard/mbd/pro_mbd_cpu_support_detail.php?UID=641&kind=1
    Thank you for any replies.

    Mine worked, ran for 2 weeks already at stock, tried & ran to 2.2GHz on stock HSF with no problem.
    Using X2 3800+ E6, MSI K8N PLI Platinum mobo, 3.7 bios & Inno3D 7800GTX single latest nvidia 78 drivers, 2x512MB DDR400 CL2.5 Kingston Ram, Hitachi T7K250 Sata 250GB HDD, NEC ND-3530A Benq 1640, , Silverstone Zeus 650W PSU
    At first I have this concern too, but tried it anyway.
    See my screenshots for your info.

  • MST Support for MacBook Pro Retina Late 2013 - DisplayPort 1.2 - Will it ever happen? (with sources)

    So back in October, I purchased a brand new Macbook Pro Retina (MBPr), fully loaded with top of the line specs.  I was soooo excited to have Thunderbolt 2 tech which Intel AND Apple describes as having DisplayPort 1.2a compatibility - which up to this point is unfortunately NOT the case.  The point of the information/questions and requests in this article is to engage a conversation about the issues of not having MST support after Apple falsely mislead their consumers to think otherwise - especially when it is clear the MBPr is capable.  Please read on...
    Apple advertises that the Thunderbolt 2 ports on BOTH the MBPr and the new Mac Pro (NMP) will have 4K Display support with the famed 20gb/sec Ports (DisplayPort 1.2 only requires a little above 17gb/sec).  Now that the 10.9.1 update has been released, we have failed to see MST or Multi-Stream Transport enabled on the MBPr Late 2013.  Now, as for the New Mac Pro- it DOES have MST enabled in 10.9.1 with the AMD GPUs.  For all of you out there that's questioning what this means, short answer is basically the Mac Pro will be able to power a 4K Monitor at 60Hz through the Thunderbolt 2 Port but the New MBPr is stuck with only HDMI 1.4 support which tops out at 4K 30Hz. 30Hz is unacceptable for anything but movies or a photo slideshow.  At 30Hz the cursor will jump across the screen, eliminating any of the benefits of 4K.
    BUT it gets worse...
    Apple can be seen advertising that the new MBPr 15" model can power a 4K monitor THROUGH the Thunderbolt 2 Port here: http://www.apple.com/thunderbolt - This article quotes the following:
    "Now with Thunderbolt 2 built into the new Mac Pro and MacBook Pro with Retina display, you can connect the latest 4K desktop displays and get double the bandwidth for your peripherals. And the two generations of Thunderbolt technology are compatible with each other."
    Does this not let the consumer assume that the newest MBPr will be able to drive a 4K display through the Thunderbolt 2 Port?  I would say yes it does, but at the time I wrote this, the TB2 Ports can't power a 4K display because, as previously stated, MST is disabled in Mavericks for the 15" MBPr Late 2013.
    NOW, later on Apple posted the following article on 4K support here: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT6008
    4K support on the MacBook Pro (Retina, Late 2013)
    MacBook Pro supports 4K displays and Ultra HD TVs at the following resolutions and refresh rates with the built-in HDMI port:
    3840 x 2160 at 30 Hz refresh rate
    4096 x 2160 at 24 Hz refresh rate (mirroring is not supported at this resolution)
    In the article above the New Mac Pro is listed as having support for a 4K Display with the Thunderbolt 2 Port (or MST DisplayPort 1.2a Technology) at 60Hz with no problem.  This leads myself and many others to believe that MST will NEVER be enabled on the newest MacBook Pro Retina with Nvidia GPUs. Yes, 4K IS supported but ONLY through the HDMI 1.4 port, which has the limitation of only 30hz.  This two-faced advertising is extremely upsetting to a LOT of people, including myself.
    Interestingly enough, THIS IS NOT a hardware issue.  If one ventures into Windows 8.1 via Bootcamp and connects a 4K Display via the Thunderbolt 2 (or through DP1.2) Port, the Display registers at 60Hz, thus proving that the Thundberbolt 2 Hub Controller is completely capable of MST DisplayPort functionality.  Clearly this a driver issue with Apple, Nvidia or Intel or any combination.  What Apple has done here is forcing any professional that desires stable and clear 4K technology through their MacBook Pro Retina to do so only using Windows 8.1 on their own machines!  Definitely an oxymoron if you ask me...
    Later on when the Mac Pro was ready for ordering, Apple placed the Sharp PN-K321 as a compatible option for a 4K Display.  On the Store page featuring the (over three thousand dollar) Sharp 4K display, located here http://store.apple.com/us/product/HD971LL/A/sharp-32-pn-k321-4k-ultra-hd-led-mon itor?fnode=53 Apple states the following:
    "Note that 4K DisplayPort operation is only compatible with the new Mac Pro (Late 2013)."
    All of that being said, and I'm terribly sorry for my wordy ranting...
    This brings me to a final two requests to ANYONE reading this post:
    a) Has anyone working with the new 10.9.2 Beta Update seen evidence that DisplayPort 1.2 capabilities will be enabled for the new MacBook Pro Retina (Nvidia 750M) with the promised "Graphics Driver Updates" within the next Mavericks update?
    and
    b) To others that purchased or were/are thinking of purchasing a new MacBook Pro Retina with TB2 Ports: If you are just as upset as me about this crushing blow to consumers that just purchased a $3,000 laptop that were promised something that wasn't delivered - I urge you please, write to Apple and let them know they are making a mistake.  You can do this though the support page or through http://www.apple.com/feedback
    Thank you for your precious time, and if anyone has anything to contribute to this issue, please jump in....

    GOOD NEWS!
    The Mavericks 10.9.3 update adds official support for Thunderbolt 2, 4K!
    I'm not sure if you will be able to daisy chain anything to the 4K display.  I've read that the design of Thunderbolt 2 includes support for DisplayPort 1.2 multi-stream (MST), which allows this type of daisy chaining with 4K, but we don't know if Apple has this supported on it's machines.  Apparently it's been buggy in development because the graphics driver needs to work correctly with the Thunderbolt 2 host controller.  I'm sure they will work it out if they haven't already.
    The above is all via found information on this topic, but you can follow some more discussion here:
    http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1713876
    One more note on Thunderbolt worth sharing: always keep your fastest peripherals closer to the computer in the chain. If you have a TB1 device directly connected to the computer, anything further down the chain will be limited to TB1 speed/capability regardless of it's native speed.  Always connect TB2 devices first, and save anything TB1 for the end of the chain.

  • No Support for Windows 7! Extremely Frustrated! Help!

    Ok, so here's the deal. I have TX1220us tablet pc. It came with Vista 32-bit Home Premium on it. Everybody knows that Vista is a resource hog, and running the 32-bit version on a 2.2 gig 64-bit processor is a complete waste of performance capabilities. So, what's the ideal thing to do? Upgrade to Windows 7 Ultimate of course! Not so easy... After upgrading, almost nothing works properly on my computer. I did this 8-10 months ago, and immediately noticed the problems. My CD/DVD Lightscribe Drive only functions partially, it only reads some discs and won't burn anything. The fingerprint sensor doesn't function at all. Worst of all, the digitizer (touchscreen) is no longer touch sensitive. The quick launch buttons werent working for a while, but I installed some vista drivers, and luckily was able to get 2 of the 4 to work.
    So what do I do? I talk to HP Support for help. Unfortunately, the only "support" that I could get out of them was in the form of a few sentences. "Unfortunately, HP does not recommend upgrading from the pre-installed operating system. HP does not support anything but the pre-installed operating system" and "This is something that HP is currently developing, and we will update the support page as soon as updates are available for your hardware". The irony of this all is this: At the exact time that HP gave me the first statement, there was an ad with a link from HP on the right margin of my models support page stating "The Wait for Windows 7 is Over! Upgrading your computer has never been easier!".
    Again this was 8-10 months ago that I went through all of this, and now I finally decided to give it another try. You'd think in 10 months that they would be able to develop some sort of updates for customers. Wrong... I once again received the exact same responses with absolutely no sense of concern or care for the happiness of a customer from the support representative. I have finally decided that this is some sort of marketing scheme or sales scam to force their customers to go out and buy a new computer, even though there is no need for it. My laptop is 300x faster on Win7 x64 than it was on Vista, and after paying for an expensive new operating system for a tablet that i purchased only 3 years ago for $1,600 I have no intent on going out and purchasing a new one just so I can run Windows 7.
    Does anybody know who to talk to about getting issues like this resolved or to get compensation for HP's complete lack of care for customer satisfaction? Any info would be nice. Finally, if anybody has come up with a way to get this system working properly on Win 7, I'm open for suggestions. I have tried installing HP Vista drivers on my system, but when I run the setup packages, they exit out saying that the setup programs are designed for windows vista, that it has detected a different operating system, and that the setup will now exit.
    Help!
    tx1220us - Windows 7 Ultimate x64 - Nothing but problems

    I think you would be very surprised at how many of your drivers are supported natively by Windows 7. I have an even newer AMD laptop which I installed W7 on and had to install very few  drivers. Running Windows Update manually from Control Panel and choosing to also see 'Optional' updates gave me those.
    ******Clicking the Thumbs-Up button is a way to say -Thanks!.******
    **Click Accept as Solution on a Reply that solves your issue to help others**

  • 10.10.3 breaks support for ATI video cards

    The 10.10.3 update has broken support for a bunch of ATI video cards that worked just fine under 10.10.2. This is for my Mac Pro 5,1. Some folks also reported issues with breaking support for Nvidia cards, but have mentioned that the latest Nvidia beta drivers might work.
    There is a thread that may be found here that has some details:
    OS X 10.10.3 Update
    and here (reverting back to 10.10.2 fixes things):
    http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1864352
    Specifically, my Visiontek Eyefinity 6 7750 stopped working, and another users Radeon 7770 stopped working.  Yet, the 7970 continues to work.  Reverting to the old ATI 5770 that came with the machine renders it usable. This is a problem as the 7750 only took a single slot, and the two 5770s eat up 3 slots so I can't use my USB 3 card, etc.
    I remember this once happened before.  I think it was with the 10.9.2 update which borked a bunch of video cards that worked fine under 10.9.1, and then were again made to work just fine with the 10.9.3 update.
    All the 'standard' fixes have been attempted.  Clean installs.  Fix permissions. Etc.
    Not sure why apple would seemingly disable support for these cards, other than by accident, I assume, much like happened with the 10.9.2 update.
    Also not sure if just copying the correct driver from 10.10.2 might solve the problem until Apple get's around to fixing the issue.  Has anyone tried?  Any suggestions would be appreciated.  Thanks!

    Hi, i am using dual Cinema Display 30 and 23 with a HIS ATI 7750 1 GB on a Mac Pro 3.1. Post upgrade from 10.10.2 to 10.10.3 my display eded unusable blurry. Therefore I have tried to replace the 10.10.3 kext with the previous 10.10.2. But it did not work out as expected. I managed to get some video output but no acceleration at all. Therefore the system is unusable. Therefore i full downgraded to 10.10.2 now.
    Never the less it might be a good starting point for someone to get acceleration running. This is what I did:
    I have to set the nvram variable kext-dev-mode=1, but be warned this will allow any unsigned > .kext to load, including rootlets, malware, etc.
    I did this in order to allow me to modify the kext if necessary and to ensure that if 10.10.2 kext might be locked that they still be loaded and the computer will not be prevented from boot.
    sudo nvram boot-args="kext-dev-mode=1"
    sudo shutdown -r now
    Post this i copied from my other Mac running 10.10.2 the file /System/Library/Extensions/AMDRadeonX4000.kext to my Mac Pro 3.1 running 10.10.3 with no proper video output. Basically i copied all ATI related kext from one mac to the other.
    copied  [MAC10.10.2]/System/Library/Extensions/ATI* ----> [MAC10.10.3]/System/Library/Extensions/ATI*
    copied  [MAC10.10.2]/System/Library/Extensions/AMD* ----> [MAC10.10.3]/System/Library/Extensions/AMD*
    someone needs to do a diff here to identify the file with is necessary the only one i found with a significant change seems to be AMDRadeonX4000.kext
    I forced to rebuild kext cache manually
    sudo touch /System/Library/Extensions
    sudo kextcache -m /System/Library/Caches/com.apple.kext.caches/Startup/Extensions.mkext /System/Library/Extensions
    And reboot!
    sudo shutdown -r now
    After the reboot I had  display output but no acceleration at all. Seeing the video out put made me happy but the system is unusable to to the lack of acceleration of the display. I am really looking forward for Apple to fix the update and to reapply support for the ATI GPUs hence it allows to save environmental resources to keep good products like the Mac Pro 3.1 running...

  • Why Apple does not offer support for linux?

    We all know the history of Apple. It clearly shows a trend to be open source, excepting for the licenses they share with Microsoft. In my personal case, I love open source because it has solved several of my problems. Just to share this with everyone, I am the network manager of a educational institution and I used to have my servers running on windows platform. Since we used to buy it all from Microsoft, they would give us free software for or labs, software like Visual Studio. They even assigned us engineers to plan everything for our servers, free of cost. Guess what? It was a disaster. We had our database destroyed by an external attack. We were “lucky” to have Microsoft in our servers and in our firewalls.
    We had to take action, so I decided to switch to Debian, and to use IPCOP (a great dedicated firewall, if there is anyone interested, the link is: http://ipcop.org/ , please note, I am NOT affiliated with them, and I will receive no compensation or benefit if you chose to access it or not ). Both open source. The result, no external attack has been able to pass trough. After that, we switched most* of our e-learning platforms to open source, and guess what? We are saving over 60,000 yearly just in software. So for those who are looking for a good way to get good security without loosing an eye, try open source.
    Now back to the point, I do not fully support any operative system. They all have their good features, or at least they should. The ones I know, are because I use them. My home network is composed by computers running in five different versions of Linux, two running in Mac OS X Tiger, and some others running in XP pro. My main computer is running in Ubuntu, and is really sad to see that there is no software from apple available for Linux. That is honestly the worst part of Linux, having no iTunes or QuickTime available. No way to see multimedia in the web, etc. A suggestion for apple would be, give support for Linux, there are a lot of us wanting the same.

    Apple makes software and hardware. Therefore they
    offer a total solution. Now they even can have
    windows xp running on their hardware. Making a
    version of mac os to run on linix isn't practically.
    Under a mac is unix and you can run unix software
    with the mac so you could do ever thing you are
    doing with a mac.
    I did not know Linux was one type of computer, like Mac...
    Next topic, If I was willing to pay for it, this thread would not exist, because I can actually use a commercial software to adapt the windows web plug ins to Linux... If I was in charge of Apple, I would propose to develop free software support of my products, - plug ins and so - to other operative systems... But of course, even if I did, it would not be up to me. It would have to pass trough several layers of bureaucracy, and it would take a lot of time to be approved or rejected.
    Anyway, the main issue is, the three most important OS's are Windows, Linux, and Mac. And that can't be denied. Now you can even run Windows in a Mac PC, and vice versa... besides being fancy, what else could I do with a Mac PC using Windows, when I can build a machine able to run Windows for less than 300 bucks? OK if you want to try a Mac in a i386 or a x86... but I still rather to be the proud owner of a PowerMac G5 than the owner of a Pentium 4 / AMD using Mac OS.
    Also, I thought it would be fun to see the reactions and opinions of other people with this topic, hence, I was not expecting anyone from Mac to read it, and really do something about it, because I know they won't.

  • Support for C 'n' Q with CG-revision Athlon 64

    Recently I bought a MSI K8T FSR motherboard and an Athlon 64 3000+, CG-revision. The new system is very stable and fast, the processor seems to be correctly identified, the only problem is Cool and Quiet isn't working.
    I've installed clean copy's of Windows XP and Windows 2000, installed all latest software (corecenter etc), biosses and drivers, configured power management in Windows and enabled the feature in the bios, installed the special processor driver/software but still the clockspeed seems to be locked. The AMD cpuinfo tool and the msi corecenter both report a constant clockspeed of 2000 Mhz when run in Windows 2000 and a constant speed of 1600Mhz when run in XP. Heavy benchmarking or let the pc idling for 15 minutes, clockspeeds won't change. The constant 1600 Mhz reading in Xp is especially starnge, according the to AMD whitepaper this isn't a speedstepping for the processor, it should be switching between 1000/1800/2000Mhz. (see http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers_and_tech_docs/30430.pdf , page 9, at column ADA3000AEP4AR)
    In the release notes, it says support for the CG-revision of the processor is added in the last bios version, but C 'n' Q for Cg is still to come?
    In a dutch forum, I'm not the only one encountering this problem, so I suspect it's not a standalone case.
    The other hardware in my system, just for the reference: zalman 7000A cooler, nexus 3000 psu, 40 GB maxtor harddisk, geforce 2 MX, 512 MB PC3200 Kingston mem.

    Quote
    Originally posted by IceOnFire
    Ironic that we take so much effort in making our pc's slower :-). For me too the automatic clockdown was a major reason to buy the Athlon 64. The "special extentions" I referred to are the AMD processor driver (downloadable from amd.com)
    That worked!  I went to the AMD site you mentioned, more specifically, this page, and downloaded the last program on the bottom of the page.  After a restart, vwaa-la!  800 MHz!  Never thought I'd be so happy to see my new machine run slower than my old machine.  
    Anyway, it works now... thanks for the help ... hope you get yours working too.

  • Nomachine NX/FreeNX, can't get 3D accelearation support for Virtualbox

    Greetings to everyone!
    I have a problem, which hopefuly someone knows how to solve?
    I've installed everything I needed for one small headless testing server based on Arch linux (x64, kernel 2.6.32 and X.Org X Server 1.7.3.902 (1.7.4 RC 2)), and have setup only basic stuff and services (I've attached rc.conf file)
    In addition I've setup also a desktop enviroment based on LXDE (in case of problems but it's stared manualy only when need and by NXclient or ssh -X), NVIDIA drivers (v. 190.53), VirtualBox 3.1.2 and VMWare Server 2.0.2 (x64).
    When I'm working directly on computer everything is working just fine and I have support for hardware acceleration in Virtualbox, but when I try to use it from remote location (eg. using NX client, or using X forwarding over SSH), I can't get access to 3D features of VirtualBox (3D acceleration and 2D acceleration buttons are greyed out!), also when I try to access NVIDIA settings panel it says "You do not appear to be using the NVIDIA X driver. Please edit your X configuration file (just run `nvidia-xconfig` as root), and restart the X server." Well I'm pretty sure I have drivers installed, but is there any chance they are badly configured?
    I really Arch linux and would like use it as my main distro and really would like if someone can help me find a solution for this problem, (especially knowing that the same things IS working on my second and much older computer based on Intel Pentium 4 (2.0 Ghz), ASUS P4B533 Asus GF4 MX440 graphic card Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS), and that it's a bit frustrating
    The newer computer is based on AMD Athlon II X2 240, Gigabyte MA770-UD3, and Gigabyte 7300GS graphic card.
    I've tried so many tutorials, many found on this forum, tried with different GUI (KDE, GNOME, LXDE) in case i "skipped" something and nothing helped me..
    Checked everything (I know) twice and even more, but no success.
    Is there some way to use hardware acceleration over remote sessions , am I missing something or is "the resistance futile" ?
    I'm sending my rc.conf, xorg.conf file, so if someone has more expirience with it?
    Thank you.
    rc.conf:
    # /etc/rc.conf - Main Configuration for Arch Linux
    # LOCALIZATION
    # LOCALE: available languages can be listed with the 'locale -a' command
    # HARDWARECLOCK: set to "UTC" or "localtime"
    # USEDIRECTISA: use direct I/O requests instead of /dev/rtc for hwclock
    # TIMEZONE: timezones are found in /usr/share/zoneinfo
    # KEYMAP: keymaps are found in /usr/share/kbd/keymaps
    # CONSOLEFONT: found in /usr/share/kbd/consolefonts (only needed for non-US)
    # CONSOLEMAP: found in /usr/share/kbd/consoletrans
    # USECOLOR: use ANSI color sequences in startup messages
    LOCALE="hr_HR.utf8"
    HARDWARECLOCK="localtime"
    USEDIRECTISA="no"
    TIMEZONE="Europe/Zagreb"
    KEYMAP="croat"
    CONSOLEFONT="lat2-16"
    CONSOLEMAP=
    USECOLOR="yes"
    # HARDWARE
    # MOD_AUTOLOAD: Allow autoloading of modules at boot and when needed
    # MOD_BLACKLIST: Prevent udev from loading these modules
    # MODULES: Modules to load at boot-up. Prefix with a ! to blacklist.
    # NOTE: Use of 'MOD_BLACKLIST' is deprecated. Please use ! in the MODULES array.
    MOD_AUTOLOAD="yes"
    #MOD_BLACKLIST=() #deprecated
    MODULES=(powernow-k8 cpufreq_ondemand cpufreq_powersave vboxdrv vboxnetflt vboxnetadp fuse)
    # Scan for LVM volume groups at startup, required if you use LVM
    USELVM="yes"
    # NETWORKING
    # HOSTNAME: Hostname of machine. Should also be put in /etc/hosts
    HOSTNAME="kiklop"
    # Use 'ifconfig -a' or 'ls /sys/class/net/' to see all available interfaces.
    # Interfaces to start at boot-up (in this order)
    # Declare each interface then list in INTERFACES
    # - prefix an entry in INTERFACES with a ! to disable it
    # - no hyphens in your interface names - Bash doesn't like it
    # DHCP: Set your interface to "dhcp" (eth0="dhcp")
    # Wireless: See network profiles below
    #Static IP example
    eth0="eth0 192.168.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255"
    #eth0="dhcp"
    INTERFACES=(eth0)
    # Routes to start at boot-up (in this order)
    # Declare each route then list in ROUTES
    # - prefix an entry in ROUTES with a ! to disable it
    gateway="default gw 192.168.1.1"
    ROUTES=(gateway)
    # Enable these network profiles at boot-up. These are only useful
    # if you happen to need multiple network configurations (ie, laptop users)
    # - set to 'menu' to present a menu during boot-up (dialog package required)
    # - prefix an entry with a ! to disable it
    # Network profiles are found in /etc/network.d
    # This now requires the netcfg package
    #NETWORKS=(main)
    # DAEMONS
    # Daemons to start at boot-up (in this order)
    # - prefix a daemon with a ! to disable it
    # - prefix a daemon with a @ to start it up in the background
    DAEMONS=(syslog-ng hal network netfs crond @openntpd sshd cpufreq sensors @samba @smbnetfs @proftpd @vmware @ddclient @webmin)
    xorg.conf
    Section "ServerLayout"
    Identifier "X.org Configured"
    Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0
    InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer"
    InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
    EndSection
    Section "Files"
    ModulePath "/usr/lib/xorg/modules"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/misc"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/100dpi:unscaled"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/75dpi:unscaled"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/TTF"
    # FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/Type1"
    EndSection
    Section "Module"
    Load "dbe"
    # Load "dri"
    # Load "dri2"
    Load "extmod"
    Load "glx"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
    Identifier "Keyboard0"
    Driver "kbd"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
    Identifier "Mouse0"
    Driver "mouse"
    Option "Protocol" "auto"
    Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
    Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7"
    EndSection
    Section "Monitor"
    Identifier "Monitor0"
    VendorName "Monitor Vendor"
    ModelName "Monitor Model"
    Option "DPMS" "True"
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
    Identifier "Card0"
    Driver "nvidia"
    VendorName "nVidia Corporation"
    BoardName "G71 [GeForce 7300 GS]"
    BusID "PCI:1:0:0"
    # Option "UseFBDev" "true"
    Option "AllowGLXWithComposite" "True"
    Option "RenderAccel" "True"
    Option "AddARGBVisuals" "True"
    Option "AddARGBGLXVisuals" "True"
    Option "BackingStore" "True"
    Option "DamageEvents" "True"
    Option "RegistryDwords" "PerfLevelSrc=0x3333"
    Option "RegistryDwords" "PowerMizerLevelAC=0x3"
    Option "OnDemandVBlankInterrupts" "True"
    Option "Coolbits" "1"
    EndSection
    Section "Screen"
    Identifier "Screen0"
    Device "Card0"
    Monitor "Monitor0"
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 1
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 4
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 8
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 15
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 16
    EndSubSection
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 24
    EndSubSection
    EndSection
    Section "Extensions"
    Option "DAMAGE" "Enable"
    Option "Composite" "Enable"
    Option "RENDER" "Enable"
    EndSection
    Greetings to you all from Zagreb (Croatia)

    The thing is I don't have any problem when I'm working in front of computer, only when using remote sessions (like NX, VNC, etc.).
    I can install additions, but I can't select 3D acceleration checkbox (it is disabled - grayed out) in Virtualbox, or use any graphic hardware advanced feature on computer when I'm using remote session, but it's enabled when using local session.
    Even when I try (when connected over NX) commands like glxinfo | grep render
    it says something like "not using direct rendering", looks like it's not even using nvidia driver, output show mesa driver is in use?
    Could it be something with remote access, remote access rights or something like that?
    During installations was following mostly tutorials from Arch Wiki.
    Maybe I missconfigured something, or didn't configured at all?

Maybe you are looking for

  • Variant configuration rules verification

    Hello All,    We are using variant configuration in our company and have loaded BOMs with rules. So next step is to verify if the rules are correct or not. Now one option is to use CU50 to simulate the config but that can be done one by one material

  • New Photoshop Elements 12 won't start installation

    Just bought Adobe photoshop elements 12. The disc will pop out after 15 seconds. I hear my Mac but nothing happen. I have all the system requirements (Mac OSX (10.8.5) and recent version of Flash Player. What could be the problem. Thanks!

  • Contact / address book duplicates

    WHile led I see lots of suggestions how to fix Contact / address book duplicates - I don't know what causes them. I only have 1 mail account - exchange. What am I doing wrong to see duplicates constantly being created? thanks. Be gentle!

  • Information on iPhone Water Damage?

    I have had my iPhone 3G for about 8 months now, and today my 2 year old brother dropped the phone in a glass of water when I wasn't looking. I'm not sure how long it was sitting there, but about an inch or so of the lower part of the iPhone (where th

  • HP TrueVision HD FIX

    Hi there guys. I have seen so many people with a malfunctioning webcam in their HP laptop, and I also had this problem. But, after a lot of trying i have found a fix to get the TrueVision HD webcam back to work! Here it is: I extracted one folder fro