Support for suing sql directly.
Hi All,
I'm new to Kodo, does it support using native sql in JDOQL? that is,
directly coding my queries in sql and passing them to JDOQL to parse and
execute?
If not available, is there any plans to integrate this feature or similar
ones ?
thanks.
Just to clarify, Kodo supports using SQL at every level:
1) JDOQL/Query - Query Extensions
2) Custom Result Object Provider - issue total custom SQL queries
2) Mapping - See our customSQL for examples
Stephen Kim wrote:
There is no direct support for using SQL however most of our users can
accomplish the same thing using our Query Extensions (see our docs)
which allow you embed an entire where clause if so desired.
I think using SQL -instead- of JDOQL is on the project plan but I'm not
sure of the time frame.
Also, note that one can usually get around this limitation by using
Custom Object Provider. See the customSQL sample included in the
distribution for examples of this. This example includes a number of
different examples, but the main one to note is the
PersonResultObjectProvider portion.
Amr Noaman Abdel-Hamid wrote:
Hi All,
I'm new to Kodo, does it support using native sql in JDOQL? that is,
directly coding my queries in sql and passing them to JDOQL to parse and
execute?
If not available, is there any plans to integrate this feature or similar
ones ?
thanks.
Stephen Kim
[email protected]
SolarMetric, Inc.
http://www.solarmetric.com
Similar Messages
-
Support for Sybase SQL Anywhere databases
Is there support for Sybase SQL Anywhere databases available?
Specifically, using an ODBC connection.
Sybase, curiously enough, does not want to develop specific drivers for connection to its databases; instead, it relies on an outside source (ODBC) for its connection.
I am NOT in favour of using ODBC as an connection method; we have bench-marked SQL query performance using both native driver connection vs ODBC connection; you should be easily able to guess which approach won out!!
Hint: Oracle dramatically!!You can try using JTDS, it should work with Sysbase too and if you take a look at the SQL Developer certifications, you can see it's the certified way of speaking with Sysbase.
I've never used this myself and i'm not even sure if this works with SQL Anywhere but it's worth a try. -
We have a procedure in a package,this procedure makes use of a Record Type.
In BPEL, whiile creating the partner link, when we are trying to access this procedure we get the following error.
"WSDLException:faultCode=OTHER_ERROR:Database type is either not supported or is not implemented.
Parameter L_ECO_REC is of type SAN_REC_TYPE which is either not supported or not an implemented data type.
Check to ensure that the type of the parameter is one of the supported datatypes or that there is a collection or user defined type definition representing this type defined in the database.contact oracle support if error is not fixable."
Also please find below the package specification and body:
CREATE OR REPLACE package eco_pack is
TYPE San_Rec_Type IS RECORD
( Eco_Name VARCHAR2(10)
, Change_Notice_Prefix VARCHAR2(10)
, Change_Notice_Number NUMBER
, Organization_Code VARCHAR2(3)
PROCEDURE sandeep(l_eco_rec IN eco_pack.San_Rec_Type);
end;
CREATE OR REPLACE package body eco_pack is
PROCEDURE createeco(l_eco_rec IN eco_pack.San_Rec_Type) AS
BEGIN
INSERT
INTO ag_log
VALUES(1, 'ECO name is' || l_eco_rec.eco_name, 1);
COMMIT;
END;
end;
Does BPEl support PL/SQL Record Type, if so how ?
Thanks,
Shivram
.PL/SQL types like RECORD, BOOLEAN and TABLE are not supported in the DB adapter with the current BPEL PM release (as the error message indicates). You can use JPublisher manually to generate an OBJECT type that corresponds with the RECORD. JPublisher will also create a wrapper and conversion APIs to convert between the two. You would then call the wrapper API which takes the OBJECT and then calls the underlying PL/SQL that takes the RECORD.
With the 10.1.2 Phase 2 release of BPEL PM, the DB adapter does all of this for you from within the design time wizard. JPublisher is invoked silently under the covers, the SQL that gets generated is automatically loaded into the database schema. That will create the OBJECT type, wrapper and conversion APIs. An XSD is generated for the wrapper API. Your partner link will invoke the wrapper, not the original API.
Note also that support for BOOLEAN and TABLE was also added. JPublisher generates wrapper APIs that substitute appropriate types for these parameters (e.g. INTEGER for BOOLEAN, Nested Table for TABLE). -
ODI's CDC Support for MS SQL Server 2000
Hi,
Does ODI provides CDC with log for MS SQL Server 2000? I read somewhere that we need to get a separately priced adapter for this because ODI supports only trigger based CDC for MS SQL Server 2000 and 2005.
Could anyone please shed some light on this?
Thank you.Hi,
Are you able to find out any info on this?
Appreciate your help on any leads..
Regards
Naveen -
SCVMM support for Microsoft SQL Server 2014
Hi
Does anybody know if Microsoft SQL Server 2014 supported and/or does it work, when installing SCVMM 2012. Current documentation stills says SQL Sever 2012.
Thankshi,
SQL Server 2014 is not supported: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn281933.aspx
I did not test if SQL 2014 works.
regards,
Thomas
Thomas Hanrath [MCT | Regional Lead Germany]
Thomas Hanrath Private Cloud Blog
Microsoft Learning and Certification Blog
Follow me on Twitter -
Support for Array Binding and PL/SQL tables (IN, INOUT, or OUT)
I have attempted, unsuccessfully, to use array binding in stored procedure/function calls where the sp/sf has parameters that are PL/SQL tables. I have seen the topic floating around in this forum, but I have not seen the explicit questions:
- Does ODP.NET support PL/SQL tables as IN, INOUT or OUT parameters to stored procedures/functions?
- Will any planned ODP.NET release support PL/SQL tables as IN, INOUT or OUT parameters to stored procedures/functions?
I am aware that I can use REF CURSORS to handle the OUT situation, but I need to make a design decision concerning supporting parameters of IN and INOUT PL/SQL tables.
Thanks.
JamesYou really MUST do this!! - i.e. include support for PL/SQL table parameters (IN INOUT and OUT) in a future release of ODP.NET.
PL/SQL tables are a fundamental type in Oracle stored procedures and you will be preventing a huge number of existing projects from migrating to .NET if you don't acknowledge them as part and parcel of Oracle programming.
I sincerely hope support for PL/SQL table parameters is treated as a serious issue.
Think what a coup it would be for you over Microsoft (who don't currently support PL/SQL tables with their .NET native provider for Oracle and don't look as if they will at least in the short term)!
Please, please, please! -
Team , Thanks for looking into this ..
As a last resort on optimizing my stored procedure ( Below ) i wanted to create a Selective XML index ( Normal XML indexes doesn't seem to be improving performance as needed ) but i keep getting this error within my stored proc . Selective XML
Index feature is not supported for the current database version.. How ever
EXECUTE sys.sp_db_selective_xml_index; return 1 , stating Selective XML Indexes are enabled on my current database .
Is there ANY alternative way i can optimize below stored proc ?
Thanks in advance for your response(s) !
/****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[MN_Process_DDLSchema_Changes] Script Date: 3/11/2015 3:10:42 PM ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
-- EXEC [dbo].[MN_Process_DDLSchema_Changes]
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[MN_Process_DDLSchema_Changes]
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON --Does'nt have impact ( May be this wont on SQL Server Extended events session's being created on Server(s) , DB's )
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED
select getdate() as getdate_0
DECLARE @XML XML , @Prev_Insertion_time DATETIME
-- Staging Previous Load time for filtering purpose ( Performance optimize while on insert )
SET @Prev_Insertion_time = (SELECT MAX(EE_Time_Stamp) FROM dbo.MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log ) -- Perf Optimize
-- PRINT '1'
CREATE TABLE #Temp
EventName VARCHAR(100),
Time_Stamp_EE DATETIME,
ObjectName VARCHAR(100),
ObjectType VARCHAR(100),
DbName VARCHAR(100),
ddl_Phase VARCHAR(50),
ClientAppName VARCHAR(2000),
ClientHostName VARCHAR(100),
server_instance_name VARCHAR(100),
ServerPrincipalName VARCHAR(100),
nt_username varchar(100),
SqlText NVARCHAR(MAX)
CREATE TABLE #XML_Hold
ID INT NOT NULL IDENTITY(1,1) PRIMARY KEY , -- PK necessity for Indexing on XML Col
BufferXml XML
select getdate() as getdate_01
INSERT INTO #XML_Hold (BufferXml)
SELECT
CAST(target_data AS XML) AS BufferXml -- Buffer Storage from SQL Extended Event(s) , Looks like there is a limitation with xml size ?? Need to re-search .
FROM sys.dm_xe_session_targets xet
INNER JOIN sys.dm_xe_sessions xes
ON xes.address = xet.event_session_address
WHERE xes.name = 'Capture DDL Schema Changes' --Ryelugu : 03/05/2015 Session being created withing SQL Server Extended Events
--RETURN
--SELECT * FROM #XML_Hold
select getdate() as getdate_1
-- 03/10/2015 RYelugu : Error while creating XML Index : Selective XML Index feature is not supported for the current database version
CREATE SELECTIVE XML INDEX SXI_TimeStamp ON #XML_Hold(BufferXml)
FOR
PathTimeStamp ='/RingBufferTarget/event/timestamp' AS XQUERY 'node()'
--RETURN
--CREATE PRIMARY XML INDEX [IX_XML_Hold] ON #XML_Hold(BufferXml) -- Ryelugu 03/09/2015 - Primary Index
--SELECT GETDATE() AS GETDATE_2
-- RYelugu 03/10/2015 -Creating secondary XML index doesnt make significant improvement at Query Optimizer , Instead creation takes more time , Only primary should be good here
--CREATE XML INDEX [IX_XML_Hold_values] ON #XML_Hold(BufferXml) -- Ryelugu 03/09/2015 - Primary Index , --There should exists a Primary for a secondary creation
--USING XML INDEX [IX_XML_Hold]
---- FOR VALUE
-- --FOR PROPERTY
-- FOR PATH
--SELECT GETDATE() AS GETDATE_3
--PRINT '2'
-- RETURN
SELECT GETDATE() GETDATE_3
INSERT INTO #Temp
EventName ,
Time_Stamp_EE ,
ObjectName ,
ObjectType,
DbName ,
ddl_Phase ,
ClientAppName ,
ClientHostName,
server_instance_name,
nt_username,
ServerPrincipalName ,
SqlText
SELECT
p.q.value('@name[1]','varchar(100)') AS eventname,
p.q.value('@timestamp[1]','datetime') AS timestampvalue,
p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS objectname,
p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_type"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') AS ObjectType,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="database_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS databasename,
p.q.value('(./data[@name="ddl_phase"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') AS ddl_phase,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="client_app_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS clientappname,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="client_hostname"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS clienthostname,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="server_instance_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS server_instance_name,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="nt_username"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS nt_username,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="server_principal_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS serverprincipalname,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="sql_text"]/value)[1]','Nvarchar(max)') AS sqltext
FROM #XML_Hold
CROSS APPLY BufferXml.nodes('/RingBufferTarget/event')p(q)
WHERE -- Ryelugu 03/05/2015 - Perf Optimize - Filtering the Buffered XML so as not to lookup at previoulsy loaded records into stage table
p.q.value('@timestamp[1]','datetime') >= ISNULL(@Prev_Insertion_time ,p.q.value('@timestamp[1]','datetime'))
AND p.q.value('(./data[@name="ddl_phase"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') ='Commit' --Ryelugu 03/06/2015 - Every Event records a begin version and a commit version into Buffer ( XML ) we need the committed version
AND p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_type"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') <> 'STATISTICS' --Ryelugu 03/06/2015 - May be SQL Server Internally Creates Statistics for #Temp tables , we do not want Creation of STATISTICS Statement to be logged
AND p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') NOT LIKE '%#%' -- Any stored proc which creates a temp table within it Extended Event does capture this creation statement SQL as well , we dont need it though
AND p.q.value('(./action[@name="client_app_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') <> 'Replication Monitor' --Ryelugu : 03/09/2015 We do not want any records being caprutred by Replication Monitor ??
SELECT GETDATE() GETDATE_4
-- SELECT * FROM #TEMP
-- SELECT COUNT(*) FROM #TEMP
-- SELECT GETDATE()
-- RETURN
-- PRINT '3'
--RETURN
INSERT INTO [dbo].[MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log]
[UserName]
,[DbName]
,[ObjectName]
,[client_app_name]
,[ClientHostName]
,[ServerName]
,[SQL_TEXT]
,[EE_Time_Stamp]
,[Event_Name]
SELECT
CASE WHEN T.nt_username IS NULL OR LEN(T.nt_username) = 0 THEN t.ServerPrincipalName
ELSE T.nt_username
END
,T.DbName
,T.objectname
,T.clientappname
,t.ClientHostName
,T.server_instance_name
,T.sqltext
,T.Time_Stamp_EE
,T.eventname
FROM
#TEMP T
/** -- RYelugu 03/06/2015 - Filters are now being applied directly while retrieving records from BUFFER or on XML
-- Ryelugu 03/15/2015 - More filters are likely to be added on further testing
WHERE ddl_Phase ='Commit'
AND ObjectType <> 'STATISTICS' --Ryelugu 03/06/2015 - May be SQL Server Internally Creates Statistics for #Temp tables , we do not want Creation of STATISTICS Statement to be logged
AND ObjectName NOT LIKE '%#%' -- Any stored proc which creates a temp table within it Extended Event does capture this creation statement SQL as well , we dont need it though
AND T.Time_Stamp_EE >= @Prev_Insertion_time --Ryelugu 03/05/2015 - Performance Optimize
AND NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM [dbo].[MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log] MN
WHERE MN.[ServerName] = T.server_instance_name -- Ryelugu Server Name needes to be added on to to xml ( Events in session )
AND MN.[DbName] = T.DbName
AND MN.[Event_Name] = T.EventName
AND MN.[ObjectName]= T.ObjectName
AND MN.[EE_Time_Stamp] = T.Time_Stamp_EE
AND MN.[SQL_TEXT] =T.SqlText -- Ryelugu 03/05/2015 This is a comparision Metric as well , But needs to decide on
-- Peformance Factor here , Will take advise from Lance if comparision on varchar(max) is a vital idea
--SELECT GETDATE()
--PRINT '4'
--RETURN
SELECT
top 100
[EE_Time_Stamp]
,[ServerName]
,[DbName]
,[Event_Name]
,[ObjectName]
,[UserName]
,[SQL_TEXT]
,[client_app_name]
,[Created_Date]
,[ClientHostName]
FROM
[dbo].[MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log]
ORDER BY [EE_Time_Stamp] desc
-- select getdate()
-- ** DELETE EVENTS after logging into Physical table
-- NEED TO Identify if this @XML can be updated into physical system table such that previously loaded events are left untoched
-- SET @XML.modify('delete /event/class/.[@timestamp="2015-03-06T13:01:19.020Z"]')
-- SELECT @XML
SELECT GETDATE() GETDATE_5
END
GO
Rajkumar Yelugu@@Version : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Microsoft SQL Server 2012 - 11.0.5058.0 (X64)
May 14 2014 18:34:29
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation
Developer Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.2 <X64> (Build 9200: ) (Hypervisor)
(1 row(s) affected)
Compatibility level is set to 110 .
One of the limitation states - XML columns with a depth of more than 128 nested nodes
How do i verify this ? Thanks .
Rajkumar Yelugu -
Future support for using PL/SQL core business logic with ADF BC
We want to migrate our large Forms client/server (6i) application to ADF, possibly using a migration tool like Ciphersoft Exodus.
One scenario could be to use ADF BC and ADF-Faces or a different JSF-Implementation for presentation and business layer but keep our heavy PL/SQL-businesslogic inside the Oracle database in packages, triggers, functions and procedures.
This scenario could be chosen due to the huge amount of interconnected logic inside the database (10 years of development; no technical components; any package may access any table and more of this kind of dependencies). The business logic nowadays held in Forms client will be moved mainly into the database as a prerequisite to this scenario.
Choosing this "keep-logic-in-DB"-scenario we need a good support by ADF BC to do so. We know and prototyped that it is possible to call some PL/SQL via JDBC from ADF BC and it is possible to use stored procedure calls for standard business entity data access (ins, del, upd, ..). But this does not solve our problems. We want to reuse core business logic coded in PL/SQL. This is much more than change the ADF standard behavior for an update with an own PL/SQL-call.
Now my question:
Will there be a kind of sophisticated support to use ADF BC in combination with database-kept logic?
If so, when will this happen and how will the common problems of transactional state inside the database and inside the ADF BC be solved? Any plans or ideas yet?
Many other clients do have similar applications built in Forms and PL/SQL and would be glad to hear about a path of direction.
I've read the technical article 'understanding the ADF BC state management feature' which you have contributed to. One current limitation is pointed out there: Using PL/SQL with ADF BC limits ADF AM pooling to 'restricted level' which reduces scalability.
Are you aware of additional main problems/tasks to solve when using PL/SQL heavily with ADF BC, which we have to think about?
Thank you for any response.
IngmarMy main problem is two 'concurrent' areas holding state in an application system based on DB-stored PL/SQL-logic in combination with ADF BC.
For a new System everything can be made ok:
Sure, it is possible to build a new system with the business logic included in ADF BC only. All long-living state will be handled in the BC layer ( including support for UnitsOfWork longer than the webside short HTTP-requests and HTTP-sessions and longer than the database transactions.
For an old system these problems arise:
1. DB data changes not reflected in BC layer:
Our PL/SQL-logic changes data in tables without notifying the ADF BC layer (and its cache). To keep the data in ADF BC entity objects identical to the changed database content a synchronization is needed. BC does not know which part of the application data has been changed because it has not initiated the changes through its entity objects. Therefore a full refresh is needed. In a Forms4GL environment the behavior is similar: We do frequently requeries of all relevant (base)tables after calling database stored logic to be sure to get the changed data to display and to operate on it.
-> Reengineering of the PL/SQL-logic to make the ADF BC layer aware of the changes is a big effort (notifying BC about any change)
2. longer living database transactions
Our PL/SQL-logic in some areas makes use of lengthy database transactions. The technical DB-transaction is similar to the UnitOfWork. If we call this existing logic from ADF BC, database state is produced which will not be DB-committed in the same cycle.
This reduces scalability of ADF BC AM pooling.
Example:
a) Call a DB-stored logic to check if some business data is consistent and prepare some data for versioning. This starts a DB-transaction but does not commit it.
b) Control is handed back to the user interface. Successful result of step a) is displayed
c) User now executes the versioning operation
d) Call another DB-stored logic to execute the versioning. DB-transaction is still open
e) Business layer commits the transaction automatically after successful finishing step d). Otherwise everything from a) to e) is rolled back.
-> redesign of this behavior (= cutting the 1to1 relation between LogicalUnitOfWork and the technicalDatabaseTransaction is a big effort due to the big amount of code. -
WARNING:Could not lower the asynch I/O limit to 1056 for SQL direct I/O.
Hi ,
I am getting below warnings in the user dump after upgrading to 10.2.0.5 from 9.2.0.1 on windows server (32 bit)
WARNING:Could not lower the asynch I/O limit to 1056 for SQL direct I/O. It is set to -1
Kindly let me know as to why these warnings are generated in the user dump.
SQL> show parameter synch
NAME TYPE VALUE
disk_asynch_io boolean TRUE
tape_asynch_io boolean TRUE
Thanks,
SachinWelcome to the forums !
This seems to be a known issue - pl see these MOS Docs
https://supporthtml.oracle.com/ep/faces/secure/km/BugDisplay.jspx?id=9772888&bugProductSource=Oracle
9772888.8 - Bug 9772888 - "WARNING:Could not lower the asynch I/O ... It is set to -1" messages
Seems to be fixed on 11.2.0.2 (or 10.2.0.5 patch 1 for Windows - see MOS Doc 342443.1 (10.2.0.x Oracle Database and Networking Patches for Microsoft Platforms))
Pl open an SR with Support to verify if this is a cause for concern, as it is not clear from these docs whether this causes any corruption
HTH
Srini -
Support for SQL Developer Versions
Can someone post the Lifetime Support Policy for the different versions of SQL Developer? It seems like you can still be version 1.1 for the archive, but I don't know the cutoff points of support for each version. I looked in the" Lifetime Support Policy: Coverage for Technology Products" document but SQL Developer was not listed. Is there another document that does?
Thank you -
ketHi Tomi,
You cannot directly save the TestStand 3.0 sequences to 1.0. TestStand can save formats upto two versions previous to the current version. So TestStand 3.0 will the sequence into either 2.0.1 or 2.0 version.
However if you have TestStand 2.0 on your machine, then you can open this TestStand 2.0 sequence and save it as TestStand 1.0 sequence.
I hope this helps
SijinK
National Instruments -
WARNING:Could not lower the asynch I/O limit to 224 for SQL direct I/O. It is set to -1
Hi,
We have recently upgraded single instance database to 10.2.0.5 patch set 4 on windows server 2003 64 bit
After upgrading we are facing issue of number of warnings in trace files (bdump)
WARNING:Could not lower the asynch I/O limit to 224 for SQL direct I/O. It is set to -1
I know this is bug 9772888 and oracle suggest to upgrade to 11.2.x but we can't upgrade it now on early basis.
According to oracle it is useless warning and can be ignored but these traces are consuming more than 500MB space per day and we are unable to delete trace files as oracle countinously using those file for writting
it is production database kindly suggest solution other than upgrade.
trace files sid_sxxx_XXX.trc
if we set max_dump_file_size to XXXM or G will it resolve our problem?
or is there any way to flush warnings to new file and delete old one.
Please suggest
Thanks
shahduplicate thread.
I suggest you don't multipost.
I also suggest you upgrade from Windows 2003 (10 years old and probably desupported)
and 10gR2 (desupported for a few years)
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA -
Support for Arabic text and Direction:rtl
I am using HTML/CSS/Javascript to develop my application.
I have been trying to get direction:rtl (right to left) to
work to display Arabic text in the right form with no luck.
Does Adobe AIR lack the support for this feature ? If so,
what are the alternatives to Adobe AIR ??
I hope one of the Adobe employees reply to this....> Any update on the Arabic support in Air ??
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/textlayout/
"Bidirectional text, vertical text and over 30 writing
systems including Arabic, Hebrew, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Thai,
Lao, the major writing systems of India, and others.
Selection, editing and flowing text across multiple columns
and linked containers, and around inline images" -
Trying to install Support for DTS packages in SQL server 2008
Hi all
I am trying to follow the instructions in the following link...
technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143755(v=sql.105).aspx
...to install support for DTS packages - when it says on the Feature Selection page, select Integration Services - none of the installs I have tried show this as an option - what should I be installing in order to see this and get this feature installed?
I just need to be able to view some DTS packages - help!
Thank you! JamesHello James,
as can be read in the article:
Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Service Pack 2 Feature Pack => SQLServer2005_BC.msi (BC
= backward compatibilty).
Olaf Helper
[ Blog] [ Xing] [ MVP] -
WARNING:Could not lower the asynch I/O limit to 160 for SQL direct I/O.
I have some traces with WARNING:Could not lower the asynch I/O limit to 160 for SQL direct I/O. It is set to -1, The OS is windows server 2008 R2 Service pack 164 bits and Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.5.0 - 64bit Production, How i can solve this warning???
Welcome to OTN
Also Read MOS Note :
Warning:Could Not Increase The Asynch I/O Limit To XX For Sql Direct I/O [ID 1302633.1]
Bug 9772888 - Needless "WARNING:Could not lower the asynch I/O limit to .. for SQL direct I/O It is set to -1" messages [ID 9772888.8]
"WARNING:Could not lower the asynch I/O limit to 224 for SQL direct I/O. It is set to -1" After Upgrading To 10.2.0.5 [ID 1155445.1] -
Support for VPD Policies in SQL Developer?
I've searched the GUI, the help and the google (TM). Is there support for VPD Policies in Oracle SQL Developer. Examples of things would be to enable and disable them, create new ones, etc.
Not as such, but you can always manage them through worksheet statements.
You can request this at the SQL Developer Exchange though, so other users can vote and add weight for possible future implementation.
Regards,
K.
Maybe you are looking for
-
My Mail displays new emails in the Inbox, but when I click on them, nothing shows up in the message body. What's wrong and how can I fix it? Thanks!
-
im trying to sync notes on my iPhone and iPad with my new MacBook pro. Although I don't see the generic "apple notes ap" on the macbookpro. Any suggestions?
-
Photoshop CS5.1 printing issue
I am unable to print anything in Photoshop. I just upgraded to CS5.1, 64-bit, from CS3. When I use the print command I get the message "The saved printer information is not compatible with this version of Photoshop, or the saved printer is no longer
-
Broken Install Disk! Is there a way to replace my broken Snow Leopard install disks?
I have cracked my OS X 10.6.4 install disk, (which, it seems to mean that my iLife application disk wont work either). Is there any way to get a replacement? I don't always live near internet access, so Lion isn't really an option.
-
I have a data grid with several date columns. I would like to format the date yyyy-mm-dd in one column, yet in another column I would like to format the date as mmm/dd/yy. How can I set these formats in their respective DataGrid columns?