Support for TLS-DSK Authentication in UCMA End Point connections?

The Lync servers support NTLM, Kerberos, TLS-DSK as supported Authentication Protocols.
However, it appears that  UCMA API when used in the End Point connection mode does not provide an option to use TLS-DSK as an authentication scheme.  Is there any way to connect to a Lync server that only supports TLS-DSK as an authentication protocol?
//etc
            _collabPlatform = new CollaborationPlatform(clientPlatformSettings);
            _collabPlatform.AllowedAuthenticationProtocol = SipAuthenticationProtocols.None;   //Authentication protocol limitation -- TLS-DSK not available.
UCFin

No, UCMA only supports NTLM/Kerberos.  TLS-DSK requires HTTP requests which UCMA can not currently handle.

Similar Messages

  • Need support for TLS 1.2

    Hi :
    SSL 2.0 was broken in 1997, SSL3.0 was broken in 1998,TLS 1.0 is broken because it relies in SHA1, MD5 which are both broken in 2004.
    We need support for TLS 1.2.
    The new fed Identify effort http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/06/25/national-strategy-trusted-identities-cyberspace
    will require not just trusted identity but trusted transport.

    Mozilla need to take the TLS security issue very serious, or they will risk loosing their customer to Opera and IE etc. Today TLS 1.0 is easily broken (see: [https://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/fixes-works-ssl-attack-support-lacking-newer-versions-protocol-092211 here] ) Possibly by at least removing all CBC ciphers from your list of allowed ciphers.

  • Support for TLS 1.2 over Exchange 2013?

    How to enable TSL1.2 in Exchange 2013, any documentation leading me to configure it?
    Is there any confirmation about TSL 1.2 Supporting or not?
    Any help or insight would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

    Hi
    Similar article, no info as yet:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/8815dada-94b5-4d89-ad80-43f03705c551/support-for-tls-12-over-exchange-2013-on-server-2012

  • Support for TLS 1.2 over Exchange 2013 on Server 2012?

    Greetings,
    We're trying to roll out TLS 1.2 in our test environment and can't seem to get Exchange to work with the protocol.
    We've been using this method to enable TLS 1.2 (and disable the other protocols - TLS1.0, SSL2.0, SSL3.0, PCT1.0): http://www.adminhorror.com/2011/10/enable-tls-11-and-tls-12-on-windows_1853.html
    We originally tried using Exchange 2010 on 2008 R2, but then I ran across this article saying that it is not supported: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2709167/en-us
    We've since tried to set it up with Exchange 2013 on Server 2012. Still no luck. The only time Exchange wants to work is when TLS1.0 is enabled.
    I suspect that TLS1.1 and TLS 1.2 are also not supported on Exchange 2013, or that I'm changing the wrong registry keys, but I wanted to find confirmation. I've searched extensively and can't find any documentation leading me to believe one way or the other
    if it's supported.
    Any help or insight would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
    --Aric

    hi All,
    Even i have tried enabling TLS 1.2 on Exchange 2013 from registry. i followed the below article.
    http://jackstromberg.com/2013/09/enabling-tls-1-2-on-iis-7-5-for-256-bit-cipher-strength/
    When i check OWA in chrome and check the connection information it says "The connection uses TLS 1.2.
    However when i run the below command to check for TLS 1.2 i get the following O/P.
    Command: java -jar TestSSLServer.jar ns-ex13.gtestexchange.com 443
    O/P:
    Supported versions: SSLv3 TLSv1.0 TLSv1.1
    Deflate compression: no
    Supported cipher suites (ORDER IS NOT SIGNIFICANT):
      SSLv3
         RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5
         RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA
         RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA
      TLSv1.0
         RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5
         RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA
         RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA
         RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA
         RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA
         TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA
         TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA
      (TLSv1.1: idem)
    Server certificate(s):
      1979e6bdbd9b8e197d00c45534959eaba82b6f40: CN=ex10.gtestexchange.com, OU=Domain
     Control Validated
    Minimal encryption strength:     strong encryption (96-bit or more)
    Achievable encryption strength:  strong encryption (96-bit or more)
    BEAST status: vulnerable
    CRIME status: protected
    ===================================================
    It doesnt says anything about TLS 1.2.
    Any suggestions from your side?

  • Support for PHP 4 coming to an end - implications for DW

    This is a copy of a post I sent to the Dreamweaver
    Application
    Development forum, but it's relevant to many people here,
    too. Apologies
    if you have already read it.
    Today (13 July 2007) is the third anniversary of the release
    of PHP 5.
    To mark this occasion, the PHP development team has announced
    that
    support for PHP 4, except for critical security fixes, will
    be
    discontinued on 31 December. Furthermore, even critical
    security fixes
    for PHP 4 will cease on 8 August 2008 (8/8/08). You are urged
    to move to
    PHP 5.2 as soon as practicable.
    As far as PHP code generated by Dreamweaver MX 2004, DW8, and
    DW CS3 is
    concerned, this change will have NO effect. The code runs
    without
    problem on PHP 5.2, and should continue to run even when PHP
    6 is
    eventually released.
    Code generated by Dreamweaver MX should be upgraded to run on
    PHP 5.2,
    as it uses deprecated predefined variables, such as
    $HTTP_POST_VARS
    (instead of $_POST). Although PHP 5.2 can be configured to
    support the
    deprecated variables, they will NOT be supported in PHP 6, so
    it's a
    good idea to start planning ahead.
    If you're on shared hosting, the likelihood is that your
    server still
    runs PHP 4. Now is the time to start pressuring your hosting
    company to
    commit to upgrade to PHP 5.2. There's no need to panic,
    because there
    will be security patches for another year; but after that,
    any host
    still running PHP 4 will leave you potentially open to
    security risks.
    A lot of people worry that switching from PHP 4 to PHP 5 will
    result in
    broken sites. For the vast majority of people, it won't. When
    I switched
    three years ago, I didn't need to change a single line of
    code. The only
    people who are likely to face problems are those using very
    old code or
    object-oriented PHP.
    David Powers, Adobe Community Expert
    Author, "Foundation PHP for Dreamweaver 8" (friends of ED)
    Author, "PHP Solutions" (friends of ED)
    http://foundationphp.com/

    Yes OHS (Oracle HTTP Server) comes with PHP pre-installed and ready to use. Refer following for details:
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B32110_01/web.1013/b28948/php.htm#BABIGCFB
    Thanks
    Shail

  • Getting the end point to end point connections paths that exist from Switch Exe

    Can I query the Switch Exe data base and get a list of the existing paths that Switch EXE has connected?
    I have a debug app that reads the channel names (via a property node) and present them to the operator to manually connect and disconnect paths using the end points. I would like to have an indicator showing the current paths that are connected and I was hoping to be able to get that from Switch Exe without me having to add code to keep track of it myself.
    The goal is to be able to click on any existing path to disconnect it. 
    I do query the switch cards and display the actual relays that are closed, but that is hard to relate that to what channels that are connected when we have 8 matrix cards all interconnected.
    Thanks
    Omar
    Omar

    Hi Omar,
    Try using something like the example below that incorporates an array to check every connection.  If the path is found to exist, then you could add that combination to an array that is displayed on the front panel.  Also see this knowledge base article about the known issue with the Find Routes VI.  Use the VI from the bottom of the page in place of the Find Routes from the palette.  Hopefully this helps!
    Regards,
    h_baker
    National Instruments
    Applications Engineer
    Digital Multimeter Resources

  • Support for smart-card authentication in PowerBuilder based application

    Hi, I have an application on PB11.5 with an Oracle DB back-end (11.2g). My DoD customer wants the application to use their DoD CAC Card (Smart Card) to authenticate against the Enterprise - Windows Active Directory domain, currently the application uses user-id\password for user authentication.  Is this something newer versions of PB can support and implement? Thank you.

    You have a couple of choices:
    1.  Depending on how old their workstations are, or if they have ACTIVCLIENT installed, you could call the CAPICOMM ActiveX using OLE commands
    2.  A solution that doesn't require that ActiveX is to use the Smart Card SDK built into newer versions of Windows.  It does require a lot lower level coding though, as you have to issue specific APDU commands to the card and know how to handle the responses.
    I posted a sample of the latter to the NNTP groups back in 2011.  I suppose I should get around to creating a blog entry explaining how to use it.

  • What is the timeline for TLS 1.1 or 1.2 support in firefox?

    My employer wants to deploy a webapp that only supports TLS 1.0 and above. Is there a timeline for TLS 1.1 or 1.2 support in Firefox?
    IE and others already do.

    Probably not known.
    * [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=565047 Bug 565047] – Implement TLS 1.1 (RFC 4346)
    * [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=480514 Bug 480514] – Implement support for TLS 1.2 (RFC 5246)
    ''(please do not comment in bug reports; you can vote instead)''

  • No support for downloading Creative Suite 5 Design Premium?

    I downloaded a trial version of v5 last year january.  I subsequently purchased an educational version as faculty/staff and applied my license to the trial version.
    Fast forward to the present.  My old laptop has been scrapped and I am told I am entitled to install the software on up to 2 computers.  However, there is no link available (Adobe is on version 5.5; a dot upgrade rather than a full version), no mirror, nor any support for helping me get the media (e.g. shipping install media).
    Adobe's solution is for me to buy the full version of 5.5 (no upgrade path).
    Seriously?  No dowloadable links for in-release?  There's no version-controlled distribution for licensed customers?  No offer of support other than a retail pitch to "net new" a product license I own?
    Appalling experience.  Off to the secondary market and thanks for nothing.

    I was able to locate the media but I had specifically purchased them extra
    for this exact contingency.  I had downloaded the software and provided a
    serial number.  I received no response from the provider.
    Nonetheless, I am disappointed with the model.  I appreciate that support
    for products needs to have an end of life but products within a Dot release
    should be supported by the vendor and I think that's valuable customer
    feedback.  End of story.
    Thanks for your attention!

  • OS X support for offline files

    Dear all,
    I have a mixed environment of workstations running both OS X and Windows that connect to file shares hosted on Windows file servers.  In order to be able to manage the storage space effectively, tape based archiving was implemented using Symantec's Enterprise Vault for File System Archiving.  EV and many other archiving solutions use the Windows Offline file attribute to mark a file that has been archived off and install a filter driver into Windows so that archived files can be recalled directly from Windows Explorer without requiring additional software (this is also known as a reparse point).  Please note that this is different from how Microsoft intended offline files to be used for synchronising between a roaming laptop and a network share (see KB 312717).
    OS X does not have any support for offline files natively, both for how Microsoft intended it to be used and for use with archiving software as a reparse point.  There are a couple of offerings on the market which add the required functionality to OS X, but recent updates to OS X have rendered these offerings non-functional:
    10.6.7 - I understand that Apple replaced the SMB/CIFS modules with their own code.  At this point, it no longer became possible to recall archived files using said software offerings, when connecting to a Windows file server via SMB.  See Apple bug ID 10836961.
    10.7.4 - a kernel update is included which means said software offerings are now not able to block the icon preview in Finder.  The icon preview in Finder causes archived material to be recalled which we do not want it to do (imagine the problem when using tape as the archiving platform - this will cause a huge recall job on the tape drives)
    This is going to cause significant difficulties as it effectively means that we can't use archiving with OS X to manage our storage costs. 
    I'm writing this as I'm hoping that someone will know of a product or solution that is able to work around the 2 difficulties noted above, or that someone from Apple is going to read this and realise that this is a serious problem.  The ideal that is required is to add support for the offline files, in particular reparse points, directly into OS X.
    Many thanks.
    A frustrated storage engineer.

    Hi Richard,
    We are looking at file archiving here and have the same potential issues. We haven't evaluated this product, but it claims to solve the problem:
    http://www.grouplogic.com/enterprise-file-sharing/mac-file-archiving-system/
    Good luck
    Mark

  • Authentication with Edge, weinre is not supported for Fiddler

    Environment
    laptop- laptop Windows 7
    mobile- iOS iPad
    I installed Edge, the iOS client, chrome extension, as well as Fiddler and CharlesProxy. We have an app that requires authentication, and the UN/PW cannot be passed via URL params. I configured the iPad to use a proxy, as detailed in  http://blogs.adobe.com/edgeinspect/2012/05/16/shadow-charles-proxy-virtual-hosts-workflow/  Both proxy apps use port 8888 by default.  The site I am trying to hit is external and not a localhost. Here is what I am seeing so far.
    Using Fiddler, I am able to connect remotely, and essentially, what is shown on the iPad is a mirror of my laptop's chrome browser. The problem is that I am unable to initiate remote inspection using weinre, specifically, under the weinre remote button, my device is not listed
    Using Charles Proxy, again, I can connect remotely, but am unable to get past the authentication screen. However, weinre's remote inspection is working and my device is listed under devices. The request looks correct, but when I try to enter a valid UN/PW in the iPad, an error dialog shows with "server returned incorrect response type [200]".
    How is the correct way to authenticate with Charles? Or is there a way to have weinre attach correctly using Fiddler2?
    TIA.

    Hi Christian,
    The error you saw should only occur for a subscription used with a free trial offer type. Please use the below link to open a support ticket.
    http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/support/options/
    You can check the following links for similar issues.
    The operation is not supported for your subscription offer type
    Could not submit the request to create database
    DBNAME. The operation is not supported for your subscription offer type
    Thanks,
    Lydia Zhang
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click
    here.
    Lydia Zhang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Support for XP ends when?

    I have been looking for some info on when ZCM support for Windows XP will end? Given the timeframe for 11.3's release, will XP be dropped when 11.3 is released? I seem to remember Windows 2000 being dropped right away when it went out of MS support.
    I am trying to get the remaining computers upgraded to Win7 but I am running into to opposition and need as much ammo as I can gather to push the issue - Doctors can be very stubborn.

    The reason for dropping Windows 2000 support did not have anything
    directly to do with Microsoft Dropping Support. It was the fact ZCM was
    moving to a newer, more stable, and more robust version of .NET.
    Microsoft never released the newer version of .NET for Windows 2000 and
    hence Windows 2000 support for ZCM was no longer possible.
    ZCM 11.3 will again be moving to a new version of .NET, but this version
    of .NET is available and supported by Windows XP.
    Novell has never removed support for an OS within a Service Pack Level
    in the past, though some have been ADDED in the past. Traditionally,
    support is removed during Service Pack Upgrades and even then it is
    uncommon.
    I would not expect Windows XP Support to be removed prior to ZCM 11.4,
    which would be a long way off. Even then, I would be quite surprised if
    XP support was lost since work on that version is already underway which
    means that the technology it uses would be available to XP.
    In short, I have not heard of any discussions for the removal of XP
    support, the removal of support for an OS any time soon would be a
    departure from past ZCM support history, and even the major release
    AFTER the soon to be released major update would most likely support XP
    as well.
    On 2/18/2014 7:30 AM, cmosentine wrote:
    > I have been looking for some info on when ZCM support for Windows XP
    > will end? Given the timeframe for 11.3's release, will XP be dropped
    > when 11.3 is released? I seem to remember Windows 2000 being dropped
    > right away when it went out of MS support.
    > I am trying to get the remaining computers upgraded to Win7 but I am
    > running into to opposition and need as much ammo as I can gather to push
    > the issue - Doctors can be very stubborn.
    Craig Wilson - MCNE, MCSE, CCNA
    Novell Technical Support Engineer
    Novell does not officially monitor these forums.
    Suggestions/Opinions/Statements made by me are solely my own.
    These thoughts may not be shared by either Novell or any rational human.

  • Oracle To End Support for Java 7

    No More Free Updates for Java 7 after April 2015
    Users must sign long-term support deals or migrate to Java 8 to avoid 'enormous headache and disruption to millions of applications'
    Public updates for Java 7 -- including bug and security fixes -- will end this month, a situation that one security advocate says could impact millions of applications.
    "As outlined in the Oracle JDK [Java Development Kit] Support Roadmap, after April 2015, Oracle will not post further updates of Java SE [Standard Edition] 7 to its public download sites," Oracle's Java SE Support Roadmap states. "Customers who need continued access to critical bug fixes and security fixes as well as general maintenance for Java SE 7 or older versions can get long-term support through Oracle Java SE Support. The process of migrating users from Java 7 to Java 8 through the auto update feature is expected to take place after the January 2015 CPU release."
    [ The art of programming is changing rapidly. We help you navigate what's hot in programming and what's going cold and give insights into the technologies that are changing how developers work. | Keep up with hot topics in app dev with InfoWorld's Application Development newsletter. ]
    Oracle released Java SE 7 in July 2011; Java SE 8 was released in March 2014. Java, particularly on the client side, has been beset by security issues in recent years. But Oracle has taken many steps to address the issues and stressed that most of the problems dated back several years, before Oracle took over Java from Sun in 2010.
    Still, the impact of Oracle's cessation of public updates could be severe, an official at security firm Waratek, believes. Oracle's "rapid" end-of-life schedule for Java versions is great for innovation and language evolution, Waratek CTO John Matthew Holt said in an emailed statement. "However, there is a dangerous tradeoff; now millions of Java 7 applications will have to defend themselves against code-level vulnerabilities without the benefit of future fixes." Holt advocates either upgrades to Java 8 or use of Java Run-time Application Self Protection (RASP) technologies (Waratek is a RASP vendor).
    This week's security update from Oracle, meanwhile, marks the "proverbial 'end of the road' for Java 7 application security, Holt said. "After today, the only version of the Java Platform which will receive public security updates is Java 8.  This is huge news, and it is going to cause enormous headache and disruption to millions of application owners around the world."
    Contacted Tuesday afternoon for a comment on the end of public updates for Java SE 7, by late evening Oracle had not yet responded.
    The April 2015 Critical Patch Update released Tuesday by Oracle provides 98 new fixes for security issues across a wide range of product families, said Eric Maurice in an Oracle blog post. These range from Oracle Database to Oracle Fusion Middleware, Java SE, and MySQL. Fourteen of the security fixes are for Java SE.

    Java 7 has already been dead for quite a while. While you could still use it for Java apps on your system, Apple blocked its use in browsers long ago. You have to install version 8 if you need Java support for the web.

  • When will Oracle end support for Version 7

    We have several servers running Oracle 7.3.4 and we are making upgrade plans.
    Could anyone tell us when support for version 7 will end.
    Thanks

    Java 7 has already been dead for quite a while. While you could still use it for Java apps on your system, Apple blocked its use in browsers long ago. You have to install version 8 if you need Java support for the web.

  • End of Premier & Sustaining Support for OWB 10gR2

    Hi,
    I've read that for OWB 10gR1 the Premier Support ends Jul 2007 (Extended Support not offered) and the Sustaining Support ends Jul 2010 (no maintenance).
    Would you have the information for OWB 10gR2 ? => will drive our choice for 10gR2 or 11gR1...
    Thanks in advance,
    Sébastien

    From http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/warehouse/htdocs/owb_10gr2_faq.htm#HowisOWBPackaged:
    Is Warehouse Builder 10g Release 2 now licensed as part of the database?
    Yes, as of May 2006 Warehouse Builder is now shipped as part of the database and is no longer part of Developer Suite. The licensing and pricing have changed. See below for more details.
    What are the key licensing options for Warehouse Builder 10g Release 2?
    Warehouse Builder is now comprised of four components as follows
    The core ETL features are now provided free with the database Standard Edition, Standard Edition One, and Enterprise Edition. The core features that are provided free are those provided by the current 10g Release 1 version of Warehouse Builder with the addition of "Experts".
    So support for OWB10gR2 will follow support for DB 10gR2: Oracle Lifetime Support policy:
    http://www.oracle.com/support/lifetime-support-policy.html
    Release - GA Date Premier - Support Ends - Extended Support Ends - Sustaining Support Ends
    10.2 - Jul 2005 - Jul 2010 - Jul 2013 - Indefinite

Maybe you are looking for