SURCHARGE ON VAT NOT CAPTURING CORRECTLY IN MIRO

Hello Experts,
       We've TAXINN procedure. Recently as per our client reqmt., we mapped Surcharge on VAT @ 10% with seperate surcharge conditions for all corresponding VAT conditions i.e. JVRD,JVRN,JVCD & JVCN.
        Now the particular scenario in which we r facing problem is as below:
              1. PO with excise duty, ECS,SECS, VAT & Surcharge created
              2. At the time of GR excise invoice is captured referring to vendor invoice due to which BED,ECS etc. with base amt. changed as per vendor invoice
               3. Excise invoice thrgh J1IEX posted
        Now the problem is at the time of MIRO simulation, VAT @ 12.5% is calculated based on GR, but Surcharge is dipalyed same as PO condition value. We want this to be calculated as per GR VAT.
       So pls. help me in this regard as I'm unable to point out the config. related error.
Thanks in Advance
       Amit
Edited by: Amit V Chavre on Feb 18, 2010 6:17 PM

>
Amit V Chavre wrote:
> Hello Experts,
>        We've TAXINN procedure. Recently as per our client reqmt., we mapped Surcharge on VAT @ 10% with seperate surcharge conditions for all corresponding VAT conditions i.e. JVRD,JVRN,JVCD & JVCN.
>         Now the particular scenario in which we r facing problem is as below:
>               1. PO with excise duty, ECS,SECS, VAT & Surcharge created
>               2. At the time of GR excise invoice is captured referring to vendor invoice due to which BED,ECS etc. with base amt. changed as per vendor invoice
>                3. Excise invoice thrgh J1IEX posted
>         Now the problem is at the time of MIRO simulation, VAT @ 12.5% is calculated based on GR, but Surcharge is dipalyed same as PO condition value. We want this to be calculated as per GR VAT.
>        So pls. help me in this regard as I'm unable to point out the config. related error.
>
> Thanks in Advance
>        Amit
>
> Edited by: Amit V Chavre on Feb 18, 2010 6:17 PM
I have faced a similar problem with additional tax on VAT which is present in Gujarat.
You are right, the surcharge does not get recalculated during MIRO because the system has not been designed to recalculate the surcharge (only VAT has been included).
You will have to change the behavior by means of a user exit in function module J_1I7_USEREXIT_PROCESS_TKOMV.
I had raised an OSS, and was recommended to use the above exit. You will have to modify the XKOMV-KWERT for the surcharge conditions, based on the value of VAT conditions.
Regards,
Aroop

Similar Messages

GST/VAT not captured in intra company stock transfer in S_ALR_87012357

Please advise why GST/VAT report S_ALR_87012357 is not capturing the tax codes in the GST/VAT report in case of intra company stock transfer postings. However with the documents that are tagged to vendors it captures the GST/VAT inthe report.

Dear Srinivasan
Happy new year to you
You cannot control using 0VLP transaction for deliveries created w .r .t S T Os but it controls for deliveries created w r. t sale orders.only sales orders and not purchase orders
You will have to use user exit or BADI to control the over delivery You can use User Exit - LV50PFZA for STO Delivery Quantity Control ,ensure that while coding check logic has to be put in required Transaction Codes only otherwise this User Exit is called in all Delivery and Billing Transactions causing delay in execution..
Regards
Raja

Cenvat Availment Duties Not captured Correctly during Import Goods Receipt

For Import Procurement we follow the following cycle
PO->Customs MIRO->Goods Receipt>J1IEX->Vendor MIRO
While Posting the Goods Receipt we give the Customs MIRO number and system Should calculate the duties like CVD,Cess on CVD and Add duty on Imports only based on this Customs MIRO number.
But in our case its calculating the value based on amount given in PO and not based on the Customs MIRO number.
Uptill December the values where posted correctly.But Only from January we are facing this problem?
Thanks & Regards
Sentil

Hi Senthil
The Custom duty, CVD, Ecess on CVD, Ecess on Customs and ADC are polulated on goods receipt through the MIRO document once MIRO document is posted and referred. If MIRO is not done, then system has to copy from PO.
You said that its calculating the value based on amount given in PO and not based on the Customs MIRO number. But lwt me know whether they are populating to excise fields in MIGO. Also check whether all these are getting loaded on material? (Whether both FI documents are accurate or not?)
Basically, these condition types shall be marked as accruals.

Airport Express Not Capturing Correct IP Address

I've had my iMac G5 for about 18 months. I access the Internet via a cable modem. Last night I lost the ability to access the Internet.
A Comcast technician walked me thru various steps and determined that my modem and computer were working fine, and that I could connect to the Internet when the modem was directly connected via an Ethernet connection to the computer, minus the Airport Express.
Further diagnosis revealed that when connected to the Airport Express, the computer was receiving an incorrect IP address (10.0.1.2) when it should have captured 69.242.229.136 at the time. I'm set for Using DHCP, as necessary. I did resets to the Airport Express but it continues to capture and send the same 10.0.1.2 IP address. The end result is that I can't access the Internet.
Can you help?
iMac G5 with Airport Express and D-Link Modem Mac OS X (10.4.5)

Below is the online manual for the AE. So you have been using the AE to access the Internet for 18 months and then last night .... poof? If so, use the assistant like they say to configure it. You could also change your Airport card configuration to accept DHCP and let the AE give you that address. Your computer has two ways to connect, so you may be mixing up the wired with the wireless. Wired you would get the 69.xxx.xxx.xxx and wireless you would accept the address from the AE ( use DHCP ) on your AirPort card on your MAC.
http://manuals.info.apple.com/en/AirPortExpressSetupGuide.pdf
Michael

Surcharge not calculate correctly on vat

hi sap experts,
my client is facing some simulation problem in miro. it is due to tax code as following;-
1. made order with excise duty inclusive
2. excise capture as per vendor invoice
3. GR receipt
now here's problem comes
1. order rate         675.50/kg   qty 25 kg           =         16456.25 inr after discount
2. disc                  17.25/kg      qty 25 kg
3 tax in po Bed    14%
                  ecess    2%
                  hcess    1%
base amt is 14,375.00 for excise duty
now          bed         2012.50
                  ecess        40.25
                  hcess        20.12
4. GR amt                14383.25
5. at the time of simulation entries comes as following:-
vendor                                                 17,357.06-
GR/IR Dyes and chemica(domesti       14,383.25
CENVAT CLEARING ACCOUNT            2,012.50
CENVAT CLEARING ACCOUNT                 40.25
CENVAT CLEARING ACCOUNT                 20.25
VAT RM & STORES SPARES                   822.81
*Surcharge RM & STORES SPARES           78.00 this entry should be 82.21.*
how can we rectify this problem. please help us. in po, taxes show accurately.
Edited by: deepak kumar on Mar 11, 2010 5:12 AM

Check the following link; I had replied to this common issue.
Re: SURCHARGE ON VAT NOT CAPTURING CORRECTLY IN MIRO
Re: CIN USER EXIT Details: J_1I7_USEREXIT_PROCESS_TKOMV
Re: CIN USER EXIT Details: J_1I7_USEREXIT_PROCESS_TKOMV
Regards,
Aroop

HT200166 I have a Canon XL2 that will not capture video properly in fcp 10, where it does capture properly in fcp6 and 7. How can I "fix" fcp 10 to do this correctly?

My Canon XL2 (1394/firewire 400) will not capture correctly in fcp10, but it did when I had fcp 7 on the same computer. Is there a software fix that will allow me to use the XL2 with this program?

I just want to get this clear.
With FCP 7 and earlier you could capture a whole tape in one continuous 60 minute long clip.
FCP X cannot do that. It is designed to split the tape into its individual clips, however long they may be.
Are you saying that when you try to capture clips of 10 seconds or so, it only captures the first 4 seconds?
All I can suggest is that you trash the preferences with this free app.
Many weird things happen as a result of corrupt preferences which can create a vast range of different symptoms, so whenever FCP X stops working properly in any way, trashing the preferences should be the first thing you do using this free app.
http://www.digitalrebellion.com/prefman/
Shut down FCP X, open PreferenceManager and in the window that appears:-
1. Ensure that only FCP X is selected.
2. Click Trash
The job is done instantly and you can re-open FCP X.
There is absolutely no danger in trashing preferences and you can do it as often as you like.
The preferences are kept separately from FCP X and if there aren't any when FCP X opens it automatically creates new ones . . . instantly.

Surcharge on VAT is not calculating

Hi CIN Experts
When BED, Cess and SEcess values are changed in MIGO, then during MIRO, VAT is getting calculated correctly but Surcharge on VAT is not getting calculated on changed VAT. When I searched for the same in SDN, I got one user exit J_1I7_USEREXIT_PROCESS_TKOMV. But I do not know where and what code need to be written here. Please tell me if some one has written code for this.
Appreciate your quick response.
Thanks
Ravi

Hi Shrikant
This is the code we used. Please award points if useful.
data : gc_vat type konv-KWERT.
loop at xkomv.
IF XKOMV-KSCHL = 'JVRD'.
    gc_vat = XKOMV-KWERT.
ENDIF.
IF XKOMV-KSCHL = 'YVRD'.
   *XKOMV-KWERT = gc_vat * XKOMV-KBETR / 1000.*
   ENDIF.
IF XKOMV-KSCHL = 'JVRN'.
    gc_vat = XKOMV-KWERT.
ENDIF.
IF XKOMV-KSCHL = 'YVRN'.
   *XKOMV-KWERT = gc_vat * XKOMV-KBETR / 1000.*
   ENDIF.
   modify xkomv.
endloop.
Thanks
Ravi

ED not captured in MIRO how to solve?

2) When I try to miro transaction excise duty is not captured? How to solve this issue?

Hope Ur po and excise are captured correctely
please check if u have done proper setting for Classify Condition Types
TAXINN     JAIP     AEDINVENTP AED Inventory Percentage
TAXINN     JAIQ     AEDINVENTQ AED Inventory Quantity Based
TAXINN     JAOP     AEDSETOFFP AED Set Off condition Percentage
TAXINN     JAOQ     AEDSETOFFQ AED Set Off condition Quantity Based
TAXINN     JAX1     AEDSETOFFT AED Set Off condition Total
TAXINN     JAX2     AEDINVENTT AED Inventory Total
TAXINN     JEC1     ECSSETOFFP ECS Set Off condition Percentage
TAXINN     JEC2     ECSSETOFFT ECS Set Off condition Total
TAXINN     JEX1     ECSSETOFFT ECS Set Off condition Total
TAXINN     JEX2     ECSINVENTT ECS Inventory Total
TAXINN     JHX1     AT1SETOFFT AT1 Set Off condition Total
TAXINN     JHX2     AT1INVENTT AT1 Inventory Total
TAXINN     JIPC     APCST A/P Central Sales tax
TAXINN     JIPL     APLST A/P Local Sales tax
TAXINN     JIPS     APSETOFF A/P ST setoff
TAXINN     JMIP     BEDINVENTP BED Inventory Percentage
TAXINN     JMIQ     BEDINVENTQ BED Inventory Quantity Based
TAXINN     JMOP     BEDSETOFFP BED Set Off condition Percentage
TAXINN     JMOQ     BEDSETOFFQ BED Set Off condition Quantity based
TAXINN     JMX1     BEDSETOFFT BED Set Off condition Total
TAXINN     JMX2     BEDINVENTT BED Inventory Total
TAXINN     JSEP     AT1SETOFFP AT1 Set Off condition Percentage
TAXINN     JSIP     SEDINVENTP SED Inventory Percentage
TAXINN     JSIQ     SEDINVENTQ SED Inventory Quantity Based
TAXINN     JSOP     SEDSETOFFP SED Set Off ConditionPercentage
TAXINN     JSX1     SEDSETOFFT SED Set Off Condition Total
TAXINN     JSX2     SEDINVENTT SED Inventory Total
TAXINN     JVCS     RMNDAPVAT A/P VAT RM Non Deductible
TAXINN     JVRD     RMDAPVAT A/P VAT RM Deductible
and also
Maintain Excise Defaults
all total condition above in correct field
hope this helps

Excise is not captured in MIRO in Dealer Invoice

In dealer invoice , In PO, for Eg: Basic price : 1000 + vat 200, Total 1200 Rs.
I have changed excise duty values in MIGO . for Eg: Basic price : 900 + Excise 100, Total 1000 Rs.MRP Indicator activated
Excise is not captured in MIRO.
Regards.,
Lakshmanan.S

In case of dealer invoice you will have to change the Tax code in MIRO in your case to get the Excise calculated.
Other way is you take excise credit first with J1IEX clicking MRP indicator and properly takin excise credit, after that MIRO will automatically take excise in to accounts.

Condition Surcharge on VAT is not picking in the PO

Hi Experts,
We have surcharge on VAT, for which we have created a new condition type for both credit and non credit - RM & Capitals separately.
We have done all the settings, TAXINN procedure, OB40 etc.. in cluding the Logistic general ->Condition based Exicse determination ->clasify condition types, we have used APSUR - A/P ST Surcharge as the condition name. (this is maintained for all the new 4 condition types, same one)
We have created the valid coondition record.
But still we are not getting the condition type in PO.
Can some one through some light on this, which step are we missing?
Thanks in adv.
Praveen

Guys,
Thnx for your replies:
@ Brinda,
I think user exit is not the right option. I have infomred that this can be achieved with the std. configuration itself.
Can you tell me how can we include condition names in the table J_1iexcdefn? Is it okay to create new condition clasification names?
We are using JIPC, JIPS for service tax conditions. Hence we cant use this also.
@gawas11,
Yes I have created new condition type with Z and added in the taxinn procedure with the help of steps.
Is there any better option?
Can some one list out the config steps to add a new condition type?

Taxes not capturing in miro

Dear All,
We have created one import PO. There are materials which are excisable .We have maintained the condition types H edu cess on CVD ,Addnl duty,IN basic customs ,IN CVD ,Edu cess on CVD ,Sec Edu cess on BCD,Ed cess on BCD in condition tab of purchase order. While I am trying to capture MIRO for the materials these taxes are coming for one material X .But for other materials Y,Z these taxes are not coming .
I have checked j1id where all these materials have chapter ID, tax indicator maintained is 3 .Excise rate maintained, are same for all the materials . Can any body let me know why taxes are not capturing for material Y and Z.

hi
please check this thread
SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
and see the reply given by Hemalatha

MIRO issue (urgent!), amount and quantity fields are not captured from PO

Hi,
When we try to post thought MIRO using PO as reference, quantity and amount fields are not captured. We do MIGO first and then MIRO.
GR based invoice verification in the vendor master is selected and the check mark GR-based in the PO is selected too.
We're getting this MIRO issue for "all" PO and Service Entry Sheet.
We'll appreciate your recommendation in order to fix this critical issue as soon as possible.
Thanks in advance.

I was looking for copy controls and other functions. Glad this is now resolved. You need to award yourself points!
Cheers.

Excise Duty is not captured in MIRO

Dear,
When we posting a vendor invoice against purchase order , It is not capturing excise duty ,
In part 1 excise invoice date is 31.03.2014 with the GR posting date 15.04.2014 and In part 2 posting was done on 16.04.2014.
we are facing this problem due to different excise year upated in table J_1IEXCDTL and J_1IGRXREF.
Please give us solution.
Br,
Swapnil

hi,
have you checked J1ID all entry for that material is exist and also check PO invoice tab whether tax code exist for that material.
Regards,
mukesh

Problem in VAT Calculation @ the time of MIRO

Dear All,
We are using the Tax Procedure TAXINN.
When we create a LIV document with ref to a PO using the transaction MIRO & when I check the calculate tax button, the tax amount which is displayed in the Basic data is more than the amount which is displayed in the taxes tab.
For Ex:
Created a PO with the following details.
Total Qty in PO - 10
Base Price - 1000/qty.
BED - 14% - 1400.00
ECS - 2% - 28.00
VAT - 4% - (4% on 11428) - 457.12
So my total Tax = 1885.12 (Including Excise & VAT).
Now when I create a MIRO document the tax amount which gets calculated when I check the Calculate button is 1885.12 (Same as above) in the Taxes tab of MIRO.
But the tax amount which is displayed in the Basic data tab is 1,942.24
Also when I simulated the MIRO entrys the VAT amount which was simulated was - 514.24 & not 457.12 as in PO.
Can anyone please advice on the reason for this mismatch in VAT calculation during the time of MIRO?
Is there any specific settings for VAT in TAXINN ??
Note :
The Excise & VAT are calculated correctly during the time of PO creation. Also I havent maintained any additional VAT condition types for my VAT in the tax procedure.
Awaiting helpful replies.
Regards,
Edited by: SAP FC on Dec 5, 2008 3:44 PM

Hi All,
Please note that when I removed the VAT condition type JVRD from the Classify condition types settings in IMG then the VAT amount which is calculated in the Basic data tab of MIRO is equal to the actual Tax amount as in PO (Excise + VAT ), but the amount which is displayed in the tax tab of MIRO is less.
Now if I maintain the Classify condition types settings in IMG for my VAT condtn type JVRD then the VAT amount which is calculated in basic data is more than both the PO as well as tax tab in MIRO.
Please note as you all have suggested I tried this after creating a new material & with the newly maintained condition records in FV11.
But still the issue persists..
If anyone have any idea. plz revert.
Regards,
Edited by: SAP FC on Dec 9, 2008 10:23 AM

Can not capture from Sony HDV 1080i (recording in 60i)

Hello
We are trying to capture from the above camera to a Mac Dual G5. We are using FinalCutPro 5.1.2. We are using a FireWire 400 cable to connect to the front of the computer (have also tryed back of Cinema Display). The footage was captured in HDV1080/60i, and we have tried the corresponding formats in Easy Setup (Basic, standard, Apple Intermediate).
The problem: we can control the camera from the Log and Capture windows, but when starting capture, no data is coming in, and the program therefor gives up after a few seconds (displaying a no data error message).
We have tried Batch and Now capture. We can log clips, and get the correct time code, but can not capture those clips due to the no data problem.

This is a good workaround for curing your camera recognition problem with FCP (if that's what it is):
First, check that your Easy Setup / Timeline / Camera or Deck Settings are all exactly the same, then making sure your camera or deck is in VTR mode, try to capture again.
FCP uses a different form of QT than iMovie for capturing, so if the camera works in iMovie (or if it's listed in System Profiler) but not FCP, it obviously means your Mac can see the VTR but FCP can't, so you need to do this QuickTime fix.
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=301852
Follow the instructions carefully and you should have things running in no time - it's quite safe but you must Trash the Receipts AND re-install QT from the link provided.
If the Camera / Deck isn't recognised by iMovie or System Profiler, try resetting the Firewire Bus . . . Turn off the Mac and disconnect the power and all Firewire cables. Leave it for 30 mins then connect back up.
Still not working? Try a different Firewire cable.
Failing all this, try resetting the PMU (Power Management Unit). The method varies from machine to machine, so visit the Apple site and search for it in support.
Don't use iMovie for capturing - it doesn't give you a timecode and that's very important.
Let us know how you get on!
Andy
Quad 8GB. 250+500 HDs. G-Raid 1TB. NORTON. FCP 5.1.2. QT 7.1.3. Sony HVR Z1E Mac OS X (10.4.7)
"I've taught you all I know, and still you know nothing".

SURCHARGE ON VAT NOT CAPTURING CORRECTLY IN MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for