Surcharge on VAT is not calculating

Hi CIN Experts
When BED, Cess and SEcess values are changed in MIGO, then during MIRO, VAT is getting calculated correctly but Surcharge on VAT is not getting calculated on changed VAT. When I searched for the same in SDN, I got one user exit J_1I7_USEREXIT_PROCESS_TKOMV. But I do not know where and what code need to be written here. Please tell me if some one has written code for this.
Appreciate your quick response.
Thanks
Ravi

Hi Shrikant
This is the code we used. Please award points if useful.
data : gc_vat type konv-KWERT.
loop at xkomv.
IF XKOMV-KSCHL = 'JVRD'.
    gc_vat = XKOMV-KWERT.
ENDIF.
IF XKOMV-KSCHL = 'YVRD'.
   *XKOMV-KWERT = gc_vat * XKOMV-KBETR / 1000.*
   ENDIF.
IF XKOMV-KSCHL = 'JVRN'.
    gc_vat = XKOMV-KWERT.
ENDIF.
IF XKOMV-KSCHL = 'YVRN'.
   *XKOMV-KWERT = gc_vat * XKOMV-KBETR / 1000.*
   ENDIF.
   modify xkomv.
endloop.
Thanks
Ravi

Similar Messages

Condition Surcharge on VAT is not picking in the PO

Hi Experts,
We have surcharge on VAT, for which we have created a new condition type for both credit and non credit - RM & Capitals separately.
We have done all the settings, TAXINN procedure, OB40 etc.. in cluding the Logistic general ->Condition based Exicse determination ->clasify condition types, we have used APSUR - A/P ST Surcharge as the condition name. (this is maintained for all the new 4 condition types, same one)
We have created the valid coondition record.
But still we are not getting the condition type in PO.
Can some one through some light on this, which step are we missing?
Thanks in adv.
Praveen

Guys,
Thnx for your replies:
@ Brinda,
I think user exit is not the right option. I have infomred that this can be achieved with the std. configuration itself.
Can you tell me how can we include condition names in the table J_1iexcdefn? Is it okay to create new condition clasification names?
We are using JIPC, JIPS for service tax conditions. Hence we cant use this also.
@gawas11,
Yes I have created new condition type with Z and added in the taxinn procedure with the help of steps.
Is there any better option?
Can some one list out the config steps to add a new condition type?

MM:JVRD VAT is not calculating in Pricing

Dear Gurus,
We are using TAXINN,now I have maintained condition record for JVRD,i.e. VAT
But despite condition value is not getting calculated in Pricing..........but when I check cond base value is getting calculated
Plz help me to get solution of this
Rgds,
Vinay

Hi,
JVRD - VAT condition is not an element of Pricing Hence please check in the taxes tab under Invoice tab of Purchase Order.
Regards,

Tax amount(vat ) is not calculated in PO

Hi,
Vat tax code I6 for juridisction code WWGB00 rate maintained was 17.5%.And then susequently it is changed to 20% on 04.01.2011.
When PO is created on todays date or >=04.01.2011 it needs to be
calculated as 20% instead it is calculating 17.5% which is old rate.
Abhilash

Hi,
Maintain tax code in fv11 and check the tax rate validity
I hope this will helpful.
Regards

SURCHARGE ON VAT NOT CAPTURING CORRECTLY IN MIRO

Hello Experts,
       We've TAXINN procedure. Recently as per our client reqmt., we mapped Surcharge on VAT @ 10% with seperate surcharge conditions for all corresponding VAT conditions i.e. JVRD,JVRN,JVCD & JVCN.
        Now the particular scenario in which we r facing problem is as below:
              1. PO with excise duty, ECS,SECS, VAT & Surcharge created
              2. At the time of GR excise invoice is captured referring to vendor invoice due to which BED,ECS etc. with base amt. changed as per vendor invoice
               3. Excise invoice thrgh J1IEX posted
        Now the problem is at the time of MIRO simulation, VAT @ 12.5% is calculated based on GR, but Surcharge is dipalyed same as PO condition value. We want this to be calculated as per GR VAT.
       So pls. help me in this regard as I'm unable to point out the config. related error.
Thanks in Advance
       Amit
Edited by: Amit V Chavre on Feb 18, 2010 6:17 PM

>
Amit V Chavre wrote:
> Hello Experts,
>        We've TAXINN procedure. Recently as per our client reqmt., we mapped Surcharge on VAT @ 10% with seperate surcharge conditions for all corresponding VAT conditions i.e. JVRD,JVRN,JVCD & JVCN.
>         Now the particular scenario in which we r facing problem is as below:
>               1. PO with excise duty, ECS,SECS, VAT & Surcharge created
>               2. At the time of GR excise invoice is captured referring to vendor invoice due to which BED,ECS etc. with base amt. changed as per vendor invoice
>                3. Excise invoice thrgh J1IEX posted
>         Now the problem is at the time of MIRO simulation, VAT @ 12.5% is calculated based on GR, but Surcharge is dipalyed same as PO condition value. We want this to be calculated as per GR VAT.
>        So pls. help me in this regard as I'm unable to point out the config. related error.
>
> Thanks in Advance
>        Amit
>
> Edited by: Amit V Chavre on Feb 18, 2010 6:17 PM
I have faced a similar problem with additional tax on VAT which is present in Gujarat.
You are right, the surcharge does not get recalculated during MIRO because the system has not been designed to recalculate the surcharge (only VAT has been included).
You will have to change the behavior by means of a user exit in function module J_1I7_USEREXIT_PROCESS_TKOMV.
I had raised an OSS, and was recommended to use the above exit. You will have to modify the XKOMV-KWERT for the surcharge conditions, based on the value of VAT conditions.
Regards,
Aroop

Tax not calculating in PO

HI MM Gurus,
I have maintained the necessary condition type in ZTAXIN (Copy of TAXINN) Procedure for Surcharge which is calculating on VAT 12.5% for Haryana State. System is not calculating for this condition type but system is calculating Taxes for other condition types.
I have checked in FV12 also, records are exists. I have also checked in Tax condition type it is also showing the records for access.
When i am checking analysis for Tax Procedure for Surcharge condition it is showing error as - "Condition record exists (Manually removed)".
Kindly help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Neeraj Saini

Hi, Neeraj
The purchase order you are talking of, was it created before this changes were carried out? If so, this changes will not get effected. in this case create a New purchase order.
Even after this if the error exists then check the following:
1. The condition type should be a copy of VAT condition type.
2. The condition type should of category "Tax".
3. Check there is no conflict of condition records, try to maintain condition Record using the same acces as that of VAT.
4. Use the same Tax Code as that of VAT condition type.
Hope this will correct your problem.
Regards

Income tax is not calculated After Total Income

Dear All,
                    I am running my payroll but my Income tax is not calculating properly because when am seeing my log then i find my total income is calculated properly but after that my STANDARD DEDUCTION is not been happening according to the rule if the employe is men it should be deducted 150,000 but it's not happenings . In payroll log where i can see the this (STANDARD DEDUCTION)amount because am not able to find how much deduction is happenings.My employe joining date is 01.05.2009
I am giving my salary components.
Basic-19500
HRA-13650
Performance-15000
LIC(IT0586 80C)-35215
Tution Fee(IT0586 80 C)-16800
Calculated PF-2340
CAlcualtion is done on the basis of 11 month
Gross Salary                   529,650.00
Exemption U/S 10               107,250.00 (HRA Annual Ex)
Balance                        422,400.00
Incm under Hd Salary           422,400.00
Gross Tot Income               422,400.00
Agg of Chapter VI               77,755.00
Total Income                   344,650.00 (Till Here Every thng is fine From the next level am not able to identify how much and which basis MY Standard deduction is calculated)
Tax on total Income             52,395.00
Tax payable and surcharg        53,967.00
Income Tax                       4,906.00
Kindly help me to resolve this issue am not a functional guy.
Thanks
Sandeep

Dear Siknder ,
                           I alredy check in it0002 it male.
I want to know how should i check in my payroll log what calculation is happening after my total income get.
And also how i can identify which finacial year calculation is been performed.

Pension not calculated when EE is hired mid-month

Hi All
Please suggest for the following....
When an Employee is hired in the middle of the month, the system doesn't calculate Pension Contribution.
Like if an EE is hired on 10th April. The system will calculate all payments & deductions, but it is not calculating the Pension Contributions.
I am maintaining IT 169, 171 for Pension Contribution.
The problem I found behind this is.....(WIth the help of an ABAPer)
-: System checks the Payroll Period Start Date with the Org. Assignment start date. When it doesnu2019t match, the system does not calculate the Pension Contribution.
For the time being I solved this through the following action -: In debugging, I canceled this condition (skipped this check). Then it calculated the Pension Contribution.
But, this is not the right solution for achieving that as we are changing standard SAP coding.
Please suggest any solution for the same.
Thanks & Regards

If your schema has p0169 with BEG that will happen, try put below Param1 which fits your requirement.
BEG
Infotype records are evaluated on the payroll period begin date.
No changes within the current payroll period are taken into
consideration.
No proration of contributions takes place, even if the record ends
within the current payroll period.
END
Infotype records are evaluated on the payroll period end date.
No changes within the current payroll period are taken into
consideration.
No proration of contributions takes place, even if the record begins
within the current payroll period.
CHK
Infotype records are evaluated on the payroll check date (the pay date),
regardless of whether the check date falls into the payroll period
itself.
A record whose validity starts after the end date of the current payroll
period is still evaluated if the check date (which lies in the future)
falls within the validity period of the infotype.
FRST
Infotype records are evaluated if there is any intersection of plan
infotype and payroll period. The first intersection is taken to
determine the full period deduction amount which is stored without
proration.
LAST
Infotype records are evaluated if there is any intersection of plan
infotype and payroll period. The last intersection is taken to determine
the full period deduction amount which is stored without proration.

Due date not calculated in F-28

Hello,
Can anyone tell me if in standard SAP, in F-28 (incoming payment) why the due date (or payment date) is not calculated ?
I fulfilled posting date and document date (both 01/09/2009) and payment terms also (Z100 - 90 days end of month), but after saving the document and when i check it in FB03, i found that payment date (or due date) still 01/09/2009 and not 30/11/2009.
Can someone explain why and in which cases SAP dosn't calculate the due date ?
In advance, thank you for help

Hi,
The transaction F-28 - Incoming payment, in general it is used for receiving payments. Then what is your requirement to calculate due data from posting date of this document. Are you referring to value date in the bank item? The due date will be calculated from baseline date in invoice, in this case you need to check the baseline date in the invoice (open item), right?
Correct me, if my understanding on your requirement is wrong.
thanks,
Kumar

Overheads not calculated in CK11N cost estimation

Hi all,
I have two issues
1. When i am executing CK11N,i am not able to get the overhead calculation in itemization,but its showing some ridiculess firgure in cost component structure.I am using dependency D020.
2 . when i am using dependency D050 the system not calculating overheads.
We have single plant with two process Repetative and Process order.I want to calculate the overhead on the Order type basis but the system is not calculating the overhead.
So i changed the dependency to D050,now its showing the overhead figure in cost component structure but whic is not matching with the overhead rate i have given..
as my go live is 20 of this month .....its bit emergency
Revert
Regards
Pran

Hi all,
Thnx for your reply.
But i have maintained all the entries in the respective area,even though i am geeting the issue.
It was working fine for my previous repetative manufacturing ...i am using the single cost sheet for both repetative and process order.
And one more thing is that i have a Semi finished goods which is the output of REIM order and is included in process order of the finished good.
The system is calculating the overheads for the semi finished good too once again.
Eg,
Raw Material A and B produces Semi finish material C overheads and the utilities are calculated correctly in Repetative manufacturing.
The semi finished material C is used in producing the finished material D ....in which the system is not caculating the utilities.The big problem is that the figure(value) of itemzation and the Cost component structure is showing two different values.
I am not sure and able to know how and why the system calculates and from where it gets these values ...... totally confussed and under pressure (may not be able to to explain properly).
Revert
Pran

Depreciation not calculated and posted

Dear All
I have a problem. Actually we had a legacy data transfer last year in the month of March.
All the assets were posted to new company code fronm the old company code by using an initial clearing account.
the entries were done through f-02.
My problem lies in the fact that 4 assets which were posted at that time are not functioning well.
The balances got transfered as opening balances in Aw01n but there is no planned depreciation for them for the year 09-10.The amounts are coming as " zero" in the planned depreciation tab.
As a result of which my asset acquisition reports are not coming correct.
I have figured out the diiferences..
The differences are regarding these 4 assets only.
Could any of you please help me in finding the reason why the depreciation is not calculated on these assets since April 2009 and how they are appearing "ZERO" in the acquistion report when there is a actual balance in the asset
Thanking you
regards
Ruby

Hi
I have checked the asset in the previous company code also.. All the parameters are same..plus in that company code the sysytem has shown the planneed depreciation too for all the assets.
now I think the problem lies in the depreciation key or in some linking between depreciation key and the asset..
have you any clue about the areas that needs to be checked for this sort of linkage?
Plus there is no over charging of depreciation.... The system didnot calculate anything in the present company code.........
Regards
Ruby jamwal

Excise Duties is not Calculating in Excise Invoice

Hi Experts,
I am doing CIN configuration, i did all configuration settings, I did classify condition types also, but i am not getting Excise duties is not calculating in to Excise INVOICE, please help me with solution
Thanks
SESHU

Please try to develop the habit of updating the forum properly so that it will be helpful to all. The comment what you have added is not going to solve the problem.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

BED is not calculating values after enter Excise Invoice number in MIGO

Hi,
We are doing a process of MB01 --> J1IEX --> MIGO.
At the time of J1IEX, we entered the Excise Invoice number and date. After that when we change the quantity, then BED is automatically change.
But at the time of MIGO, when we enter the Excise Invoice number, then BED is not calculating as calculated in J1IEX earlier.
This was working fine before apply the Patch. I think this is due to Patch because in our Development system still working fine but we have apply the Patch in Quality Server..there this problem comes..
Please guide what should be configuration changes has been done after apply the patch.
Applied Patch is: - SAPKH60015 & SAPKH60016..
Plz guide..

hi
i think your doing something wrong
i think first when u did j1iex then in MIGo u have to go for ONLY REFER INVOICE option
better you go for other process
DO GR for required quantity say 5 out of 10 without excise
then do J1iex with reference to GR number
regards
kunal
Edited by: Kunal Ingale on Jul 28, 2010 9:15 AM

ED not calculating in PO

Dear All,
I am raising a consumable PO in which I am giving only description only. In J1ID for the blank material code and plant combintaion I have maintained chapter ID and for chapter ID tax rate also maintained.
When I am giving the tax code and seen in the Taxes icon, ED is not calculating.
Pls Guide how to calculate the taxes for this scenario. FYI Tax procedure is TAXINJ.
Rgds
Srini

If you are working with -TAXINJ
If basic CIN-TAXINJ setting are proper then check for the master data.
At Master data level
1] First check the Chaprter ID rates Validity Date i.e From date to To data.
2] Check vendor Excise details maitained it or not in -J1ID
3] Maitain Chapter with blank in Material + chapter Id combination.
4]Then check Tax code for Values i.e 100% and 2%,1% are maitained for Conditions.
with regards
Shrinivas gangoor

Tax not calculating for loss of pay on the reduced basic pay

Hi Experts,
We have an employee who has LOP for five days and hence the basic pay is reduced. However for tax calculation the system is not considering the reduced basic pay, it is considering the actual basic pay.
Eg
Employee X has 5 day Loss Of Pay for the month of May.
His actual Basic Pay is Rs 10,000
His Basic pay after considering the 5 day loss of pay is Rs 8,000 for the month May
For this particulat month system is calculating tax on actual Basic Pay i.e Rs 10,000. However we want the tax to be calculated on the reduced basic pay.
Please provide with your valuable inputs.
Thanks in Advance
Koutilya

Hi,
Tax is not calculated on the month salary. It is the annual salary on which tax is computed and deducted.
Annual salary gets stored in WT /410 (Regular Income) WT /411 (Irregular Income) and /413 (Perks).
Annual Regular income is computed as under:
Annual Reg Income = Regular Income Paid till last month + Regular Income for current month + Projected Regular income for balance months in the FY.
Check the values of these WTs in your case. These must be different in May from the values in April.
VK

Surcharge on VAT is not calculating

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for