[svn] 1074: Fix test case to implement new method in IXMLEncoder

Revision: 1074
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-04-02 13:00:45 -0700 (Wed, 02 Apr 2008)
Log Message:
Fix test case to implement new method in IXMLEncoder
Modified Paths:
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/flexunit/src/tests/flexunit/wscl/dec oder/SOAPEncoderTestCase.as

Year           Is Leab Year?
1           no
4            yes
1580            yes
1582           no
1584            yes
1600            yes
1700            no
1800            no
1900            no
1996            yes
1997           no
1999            no
2000            yes
2100            no
2200            no
2300            no
2400            yes
2800            yes
2900            no
3200            yes
3300            no
3600            yes
3800            no
4000            yes
4200            no
4400            yes
4700            no
4800            yes
5100            no
5200            yes
6400            yes
6500            no
6800            yes
6900            no
7200            yes
7400            no
7600            yes
7800            no

Similar Messages

[svn] 889: Add test case for BLZ-82 where HttpService should return multiple headers with the same name .

Revision: 889
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-03-21 13:08:05 -0700 (Fri, 21 Mar 2008)
Log Message:
Add test case for BLZ-82 where HttpService should return multiple headers with the same name.
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/BLZ-82
Added Paths:
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/remote/MultipleHeadersTest.jsp
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/proxyService/httpservice/MultiHe aderTest.mxml

Hi again,
this may be old news to some people, but I just realized we can have the desired benefits I originally listed (encapsulation, reuse, maintainability, security) TODAY by using pipelined functions and using the table() function in Apex report region queries.
So the report query basically becomes, for example (if get_employees is a pipelined function)
select * from table(my_package.get_employees(:p1_deptno))
The only downside compared to a (weakly typed) sys_refcursor is that you have to define the type you are returning in your package spec (or as an SQL type). So it's a bit more coding, but it's still worth it for the other benefits it provides.
I like Apex even better now! :-)
- Morten

[svn] 4278: Add test case to qa-manual webapp on BlazeDS/trunk.

Revision: 4278
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-12-10 09:08:12 -0800 (Wed, 10 Dec 2008)
Log Message:
Add test case to qa-manual webapp on BlazeDS/trunk. The test case calls a remote object to push a message to a destination and has a Consumer setup to receive messages sent to the destination. When the remote object and the consumer use different channel set instances (even if they contain the same channel) the consumer is only receiving the first pushed message. See BLZ-288 for more info.
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/BLZ-288
Modified Paths:
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-manual/WEB-INF/flex/messaging-config.mods.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-manual/WEB-INF/flex/remoting-config.mods.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-manual/WEB-INF/flex/services-config.mods.xml
Added Paths:
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-manual/WEB-INF/src/com/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-manual/WEB-INF/src/com/adobe/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-manual/WEB-INF/src/com/adobe/samples/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-manual/WEB-INF/src/com/adobe/samples/hsbc/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-manual/WEB-INF/src/com/adobe/samples/hsbc/MessageSender.java
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-manual/messaging/RPC2MsgLite.mxml

[svn:bz-trunk] 21014: bug fix for RTMP security test case failure for Tomcat 7,

Revision: 21014
Revision: 21014
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2011-04-04 13:44:59 -0700 (Mon, 04 Apr 2011)
Log Message:
bug fix for RTMP security test case failure for Tomcat 7,
defer the ValveBase.getContainer() call to run time.
Checkin tests not run as it only applies to Tomcat 7
Modified Paths:
    blazeds/trunk/modules/opt/src/tomcat/flex/messaging/security/Tomcat7Valve.java

Revision: 21014
Revision: 21014
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2011-04-04 13:44:59 -0700 (Mon, 04 Apr 2011)
Log Message:
bug fix for RTMP security test case failure for Tomcat 7,
defer the ValveBase.getContainer() call to run time.
Checkin tests not run as it only applies to Tomcat 7
Modified Paths:
    blazeds/trunk/modules/opt/src/tomcat/flex/messaging/security/Tomcat7Valve.java

[svn:fx-trunk] 16349: Fix special case compc code in Library.java

Revision: 16349
Revision: 16349
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-05-27 16:33:00 -0700 (Thu, 27 May 2010)
Log Message:
Fix special case compc code in Library.java
Added support for special handling of include-classes and include-inheritance-dependencies-only in Library.
QE notes: None
Doc notes: None
Bugs: SDK-26467,SDK-26464
Reviewer: Paul
Tests run: checkintests, mustella cyclone
Is noteworthy for integration: No
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-26467
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-26464
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/tools/oem/Library.java

Testworkbench (STWB) - Implementation cross-module test cases

Hi experts,
we want to use the SAP Solution Manager (SolMan) Testworkbench u2013 STWB u2013 for system testing.
However, we are faced with the problem to make cross-module test cases in the system. In our test cases are examined by different teams. For example, in a account booking on the modul MM also different teams involved, which are responsible for CO and FI.
Operationally in the test case is a kind of indicator/flag can be set that each team has already tested and thus immediately apparent which team must consider the test case yet.
First, i think on a workflow - but I do not know how to implement something in the test case or Tetsworkbench.
If you have any other or better ideas?
Thanks a lot!
Regards,
Stefan

Hello Stephan,
Have you checked these SAP Solman help links?
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sm70ehp1_sp23/helpdata/en/48/e151fddb163184e10000000a421937/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sm70ehp1_sp23/helpdata/en/2e/e7769b243b4d0993429c71996f985e/frameset.htm
Also this blog is pretty good:
/people/community.user/blog/2006/12/07/organize-and-perform-testing-using-solution-manager
Hope this helps guide you in your project.
Regards,
Paul

[svn] 1388: Fixing a bug introduced for DefineFont3 equality testing.

Revision: 1388
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-04-24 10:19:44 -0700 (Thu, 24 Apr 2008)
Log Message:
Fixing a bug introduced for DefineFont3 equality testing. DefineFontAlignZones already checks its DefineFont3 for equality and so this goes back to the old behavior and avoid an infinite equality check.
Doc: No
QA: Yes, also please add a test case that makes use of two, duplicated embedded fonts with advanced anti-aliasing to the automated mxunit testsuite.
Bug: SDK-15378
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15378
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/swf/tags/DefineFont3.java

I just posted something about this too, and while I feel that its wrong to "bump" an old post, this issue has still stayed unresolved and my frustration is peaking. In my thread my problem is i can't even use the KXdrivers on an x64 operating system, so this things an expensi've paper weight. Great.
Creative makes good sound cards, NO DOUBT about that. Their customer service on the other hand however, is absolute trash. I have read that "statement" as well, and it seems an easy way out to just say "yeah we addressed it, so please, shut up about it already". And I agree, it is NOT a fix, for all of us. If one would take the time to read the forum, its not only ABIT motherboards. Even in that one thread, one if the first couple of replies a guy says "but I have a gigabyte motherboard". Surprise surprise, he was ignored by the mod who posted that (she answered some other poster's question with "read the instructions please" . Please creative, give us some faith back in your company by helping out the many of us with this problem. Only then will I reccomend and buy your products.

Problem at the time of Implementing Text Matching Test Case in OFT

hi,
I had add Text Matching Test Case on login of the application for the username and password. and If the Test Case fail on that screen,then it should not allow to go further in the application.
As currently at the time of Playback, it is allowing to go further and in the Result Report it display the case failed.

Actually my ques is that suppose at the time of recording i enter the username as abcd and password as 123.
When the recording is done . I Insert a Text Matching test case for both the username and password where i put the condition for the username that select text should be present as "def" . And the Test Case failed .
So i want to know that if the test case failed on Login. Whether it should be move forward at the time of playback?

[svn:bz-trunk] 10595: Add ReadOnly test case for bug blz-427

Revision: 10595
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-09-25 11:44:20 -0700 (Fri, 25 Sep 2009)
Log Message:
Add ReadOnly test case for bug blz-427
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/blz-427
Modified Paths:
    blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/WEB-INF/flex/services-config.mods.xml
    blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/WEB-INF/src/blazeds/qa/remotingService/Book.java
    blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/WEB-INF/src/blazeds/qa/remotingService/Echo.java
Added Paths:
    blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/remotingService/dataTypes/ReadOn lyTest.mxml

[svn] 2219: Add a negative constructor test case for RemoteObject destination.

Revision: 2219
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-06-24 14:20:55 -0700 (Tue, 24 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
Add a negative constructor test case for RemoteObject destination.
Modified Paths:
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/WEB-INF/flex/remoting-config.mods.xml
Added Paths:
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/WEB-INF/src/remoting/ConstructorNegativeTest.java
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/remotingService/ConstructorNegat iveTest.mxml

Revision: 2219
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-06-24 14:20:55 -0700 (Tue, 24 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
Add a negative constructor test case for RemoteObject destination.
Modified Paths:
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/WEB-INF/flex/remoting-config.mods.xml
Added Paths:
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/WEB-INF/src/remoting/ConstructorNegativeTest.java
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/remotingService/ConstructorNegat iveTest.mxml

[svn:bz-trunk] 23085: Fix test to explicitly remove an event listener after the test is finished .

Revision: 23085
Revision: 23085
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2011-10-21 07:49:33 -0700 (Fri, 21 Oct 2011)
Log Message:
Fix test to explicitly remove an event listener after the test is finished. Not doing this was causing the test to throw an RTE.
Modified Paths:
    blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/messagingService/security/stream ing-amf/MessagingAuthProSendTest.mxml

Thanks for the ideas regarding beforeInvoke, Ben. I will try to check that out. In my situation, here's essentially how my script is working...
BeforeSave is invoked.
Script makes a change to the document, which should be captured in the saved file.
Document saves.
Document appears saved for a moment, and then appears unsaved (asterisk in the document title).
My biggest problem is that this behavior isn't consistent. I have dozens of users, all running the same script, and the problem only occurs with certain users and at random times. I can move a problematic document from a user's machine to a different machine, and the problem doesn't occur there. It's very difficult to troubleshoot because I can't reproduce it consistently.

Payment Methods for implementing new bank

Hello Experts,
I need your expert suggestions on the below:
My Client is implementing Bank XX to replace Bank YY. At present, the client is using Payment methods 'A' for ACH Payments and 'C' for Checks with House banks "00001" and "00002" respectively for the Bank YY. We will be setting up New House Banks for the new bank.
When we implement New bank YY, can we:
1. Utilize the same Payment Methods A and C for the New bank YY.
2. What are the issues that will be encountered if we utilize the same Payment Methods.
The Client is planning to use both the Banks for a short period of time and eventually stop using the old bank XX.
Regards,
Andy

Hi Andy,
If we go by the Payment program configuration then I don't think there is going to be much impact expect for the bank determination in this case as stated below.
1. You already have the payment methods A and C within the relevant country and company code - so nothing on this front.
2. You need to create new house bank 'XX' and accounts within it in transaction code FI12 (Configuration activity)
3. But for bank determination purpose you would have to rank new house bank XX with rank 1 and not rank old house bank YY (if you don't want to use it any more) or rank it with rank 2 (if you still wish to use this house bank if the available amounts within the new house banks are low).
4. Further you would also have to identify (within the bank determination tab) the bank account to be used from within the new house bank XX.
5. Further if you are using this for ACH payments then assuming the transmission of file through IDOC you need to set up the EDI partner profile for this new house bank XX and also within the EDI compatible payment methods state payment method 'A'. Both these things can be done via transaction code FI12. But for setting up the partner profile may have to take help of ABAPER who can do it via transaction code WE20 replicating same settings as for old house bank 'YY' for new house bank 'XX'.
6. For check payment method you need to set up the check lots for the new house bank 'XX' via transaction code FCHI.
I dont think further you need to do anything other than test execute the payment.
Hope this helps you!
Regards,
Prasad

Interesting test case

Hi,
I played a little on my test machine and get interesting results so if someone could explain me what happens here I would be grateful.
It is obvious that some data corruption happened but still interesting situation.
OS: Linux 32bit
Oracle: 10.2.0.2.0
TEST CASE:
1. Created tablespace and one table in that tablespace:
SQL> create tablespace test_tbs datafile '/oradata/tbs01.dbf' size 75M autoextend on next 10M maxsize 512M;
Tablespace created.
SQL> create table objtab tablespace test_tbs as select * from dba_objects where 1=2;
Table created.
2. Made two more copies of tbs01.dbf datafile:
SQL> !cp tbs01.dbf tbs02.dbf
SQL> !cp tbs01.dbf tbs03.dbf
3. Insert some rows into table objtab:
SQL> insert into objtab select * from dba_objects;
50417 rows created.
SQL> /
50417 rows created.
SQL> /
50417 rows created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> select count(*) from objtab;
COUNT(*)
151251
4. Deleted tbs01.dbf:
SQL> !rm tbs01.dbf
5. Insert still works:
SQL> insert into objtab select * from dba_objects;
50417 rows created.
SQL> insert into objtab select * from dba_objects;
50417 rows created.
SQL> insert into objtab select * from dba_objects;
50417 rows created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
6. Renamed tbs02.dbf to tbs01.dbf:
SQL> !mv tbs02.dbf tbs01.dbf
7. Inserted new rows:
SQL> select count(*) from objtab;
COUNT(*)
302502
SQL> insert into objtab select * from dba_objects;
50417 rows created.
SQL> insert into objtab select * from dba_objects;
50417 rows created.
SQL> insert into objtab select * from dba_objects;
50417 rows created.
SQL> insert into objtab select * from dba_objects;
50417 rows created.
SQL> insert into objtab select * from dba_objects;
50417 rows created.
SQL> insert into objtab select * from dba_objects;
50417 rows created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> insert into objtab select * from dba_objects;
50417 rows created.
SQL> insert into objtab select * from dba_objects;
50417 rows created.
SQL> insert into objtab select * from dba_objects;
50417 rows created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
8. Check size of datafile:
SQL> !du -hs tbs01.dbf
*96M tbs01.dbf*
SQL> select count(*) from objtab;
COUNT(*)
756255
9. Deleted datafile tbs01.dbf and renamed tbs03.dbf to tbs01.dbf:
SQL> !rm tbs01.dbf
SQL> !mv tbs03.dbf tbs01.dbf
10. Insert more rows and executed "alter system checkpoint":
SQL> insert into objtab select * from dba_objects;
50417 rows created.
SQL> insert into objtab select * from dba_objects;
50417 rows created.
SQL> insert into objtab select * from dba_objects;
50417 rows created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> alter system checkpoint;
System altered.
SQL> select count(*) from objtab;
COUNT(*)
907506
11. When I check the size of tbs01.dbf it is smaller then before despite of more rows I inserted. How come? Where are all this rows stored?
SQL> !du -hs tbs01.dbf
*86M tbs01.dbf*
12. Now try to offline tablespace and then I get errors in alertlog:
SQL> alter tablespace test_tbs offline normal;
alter tablespace test_tbs offline normal
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00603: ORACLE server session terminated by fatal error
ALERT LOG
Errors in file /oracle/admin/um/udump/um_ora_501.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [krhpfh_03-1208], [fno =], [6], [fecpc =], [4], [fhcpc =], [3], []
ORA-01110: data file 6: '/oradata/tbs01.dbf'
ORA-01122: database file 6 failed verification check
ORA-01110: data file 6: '/oradata/tbs01.dbf'
ORA-01208: data file is an old version - not accessing current version
Fri May 29 09:01:31 2009
ORA-600 signalled during: alter tablespace test_tbs offline normal...
Fri May 29 09:01:31 2009
Errors in file /oracle/admin/um/udump/um_ora_501.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [krhpfh_03-1208], [fno =], [6], [fecpc =], [4], [fhcpc =], [3], []
ORA-01110: data file 6: '/oradata/tbs01.dbf'
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [krhpfh_03-1208], [fno =], [6], [fecpc =], [4], [fhcpc =], [3], []
ORA-01110: data file 6: '/oradata/tbs01.dbf'
ORA-01122: database file 6 failed verification check
ORA-01110: data file 6: '/oradata/tbs01.dbf'
ORA-01208: data file is an old version - not accessing current version
Fri May 29 09:01:37 2009
Errors in file /oracle/admin/um/udump/um_ora_501.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [krhpfh_03-1208], [fno =], [6], [fecpc =], [4], [fhcpc =], [3], []
ORA-01110: data file 6: '/oradata/tbs01.dbf'
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [krhpfh_03-1208], [fno =], [6], [fecpc =], [4], [fhcpc =], [3], []
ORA-01110: data file 6: '/oradata/tbs01.dbf'
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [krhpfh_03-1208], [fno =], [6], [fecpc =], [4], [fhcpc =], [3], []
ORA-01110: data file 6: '/oradata/tbs01.dbf'
ORA-01122: database file 6 failed verification check
ORA-01110: data file 6: '/oradata/tbs01.dbf'
ORA-01208: data file is an old version - not accessing current version
Fri May 29 09:01:43 2009
Errors in file /oracle/admin/um/udump/um_ora_501.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [krhpfh_03-1208], [fno =], [6], [fecpc =], [4], [fhcpc =], [3], []
ORA-01110: data file 6: '/oradata/tbs01.dbf'
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [krhpfh_03-1208], [fno =], [6], [fecpc =], [4], [fhcpc =], [3], []
ORA-01110: data file 6: '/oradata/tbs01.dbf'
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [krhpfh_03-1208], [fno =], [6], [fecpc =], [4], [fhcpc =], [3], []
ORA-01110: data file 6: '/oradata/tbs01.dbf'
ORA-01122: database file 6 failed verification check
ORA-01110: data file 6: '/oradata/tbs01.dbf'
ORA-01208: data file is an old version - not accessing current version
13. One more check:
SQL> select tablespace_name, status from dba_tablespaces;
TABLESPACE_NAME STATUS
SYSTEM ONLINE
SYSAUX ONLINE
USERS ONLINE
UNDOTBS2 ONLINE
TMP ONLINE
TEST_TBS ONLINE
7 rows selected.
SQL> select count(*) from objtab;
COUNT(*)
907506
14. Restart database:
SQL> shutdown immediate;
Database closed.
Database dismounted.
ORACLE instance shut down.
SQL> startup;
ORACLE instance started.
Total System Global Area 1224736768 bytes
Fixed Size 1267188 bytes
Variable Size 1006635532 bytes
Database Buffers 201326592 bytes
Redo Buffers 15507456 bytes
Database mounted.
Database opened.
15. Try to count(*) from table but it says that object no longer exists:
SQL> select count(*) from objtab;
select count(*) from objtab
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-08103: object no longer exists
SQL> select tablespace_name, status from dba_tablespaces;
TABLESPACE_NAME STATUS
SYSTEM ONLINE
SYSAUX ONLINE
USERS ONLINE
UNDOTBS2 ONLINE
TMP ONLINE
TEST_TBS ONLINE
7 rows selected.
16. If object does not exist, how come I get this results (probably leftovers in data dictionary):
SQL> desc objtab;
Name Null? Type
OWNER VARCHAR2(30)
OBJECT_NAME VARCHAR2(128)
SUBOBJECT_NAME VARCHAR2(30)
OBJECT_ID NUMBER
DATA_OBJECT_ID NUMBER
OBJECT_TYPE VARCHAR2(19)
CREATED DATE
LAST_DDL_TIME DATE
TIMESTAMP VARCHAR2(19)
STATUS VARCHAR2(7)
TEMPORARY VARCHAR2(1)
GENERATED VARCHAR2(1)
SECONDARY VARCHAR2(1)
SQL> create table objtab tablespace test_tbs as select * from dba_objects;
create table objtab tablespace test_tbs as select * from dba_objects
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00955: name is already used by an existing object
17. To drop object (can't drop):
SQL> drop table objtab;
drop table objtab
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-08103: object no longer exists
18. Clean up:
SQL> drop tablespace test_tbs including contents and datafiles;
Tablespace dropped.
Best Regards,
Marko

Hi Uwe,
as I said before my intention was to understand behavior of Oracle and Linux in scenario like this.
I thought about what will happen if some Linux admin by mistake moves live datafile to another location and after 5-10 mins, when he realizes his mistake, he moves the datafile to old (original) location.
Will Oracle notice some errors in alert log? (In my test case I didn't receive any message in alert log)
How will I know (as a DBA) what was done with this datafile if Linux admin does not say anything to me?
Is any damage made to datbase ? (Probably)
etc...
When I am on my test machine I like to do all kind of stuff and try anything that comes on my mind. It isn't important to me if this scenario has any connection to real world problems. I enjoy doing this so I like to spend some of my time on this test cases.
Anyway thanks for your comment.
Regards,
Marko
Edited by: msutic on May 29, 2009 1:03 PM

[svn] 1941: Fix bug with writing out a MorphShape2 line style when it has a fill

Revision: 1941
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-06-04 12:13:17 -0700 (Wed, 04 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
Fix bug with writing out a MorphShape2 line style when it has a fill
connected to it. Had been calling encodeMorphFillstyles() directly
with an array of one element, but that adds a count byte (of value 1)
which should not be there. So I decomposed new method
encodeMorphFillstyle() out of encodeMorphFillstyles(). So not a big
change, but lots of indentation changes.
Other than that all changes were replacing the use of constant numbers
with static constants from FillStyle and also adding an equals()
implementation for FocalGradient.
reviewed by Pete Farland, passed flex checkin tests
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/swf/TagDecoder.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/swf/TagEncoder.java
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/swf/types/FocalGradient.java

Hello,
We also have this problem ...
We are concluded, (??) When there is a note on the first or second line that starts in the block, justification and rebuilt and the problem happens! even made to change color of text on the blank page occurs ... our solution to an extra line at the beginning of the block without note or make it past the note on the previous page ...
when in a true solution?
Translation from French
Bonjour,
Nous avons aussi ce problème …
Nous somme arrivé à la conclusion, (???) quand il y a une note sur la première ou la deuxième ligne qui commence dans le bloc, justification et refaite et le problème arrive !!! même le faite de changé de couleur sur du texte les page blanche survient … notre solution mettre une ligne supplémentaire en début du bloc sans note ou faire passé le note sur la page précédente …
à quand une vrai solution?
Philippe

Running test cases

Each of my transformation needs to be tested for several types of variations in input data due to optional elements and data dependent conditional statements. Also, one of the schemas I am using is evolving as we make progress. When I make changes in xquery transformation I would like to have a script to run the test cases and make sure that output is as expected. I wondering if there is a way to script test cases for Xquery transformations?

Karl, All,
I dug around other websites and found a solution. The problem is caused by having [ ] characters in your project name. In my case, I was using Subclipse, which modifiies your project name as described below:
To fix the issue, go to Window, Perferences, Team, SVN, Label Decorations. Change the value for the field "Project Format",
From:
{dirty_flag}{name} [{url_short}]
To:
{dirty_flag}{name} <{url_short}>
Apparently, the JUnit plug-in parses the project name and looks for [ ] characters to determine if it should use a remote testing framework. Changing the project format to use different characters resolves this issue. I arbitrarily choose <> characters.
For people not using Subclipse, it should be as easy as renaming your project.
Eric.

[svn] 1074: Fix test case to implement new method in IXMLEncoder

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for