[svn] 4036: Updating build files to pass jvmargs to the asdoc task.

Revision: 4036
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-11-06 17:34:54 -0800 (Thu, 06 Nov 2008)
Log Message:
Updating build files to pass jvmargs to the asdoc task.
QE Notes: None
Doc Notes: None
tests: checkintests
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/airframework/build.xml
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flash-integration/build.xml
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex/build.xml
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/build.xml
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/build.xml
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/haloclassic/build.xml
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/rpc/build.xml
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/utilities/build.xml
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/wireframe/build.xml

Similar Messages

[svn] 4000: Updating build files to generate dita xml with lenient as true.

Revision: 4000
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-11-03 13:39:40 -0800 (Mon, 03 Nov 2008)
Log Message:
Updating build files to generate dita xml with lenient as true.
QE Notes: None
Doc Notes: None
tests: checkintests
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/asdoc/build.xml
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/airframework/build.xml
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flash-integration/build.xml
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex/build.xml
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/build.xml
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/build.xml
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/haloclassic/build.xml
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/rpc/build.xml
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/utilities/build.xml
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/wireframe/build.xml

Any idea, I'm looking for your opinion, what do you think of the above

[svn:fx-trunk] 12998: Fix frameworks build file that gets put in the package.

Revision: 12998
Revision: 12998
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-12-16 10:31:53 -0800 (Wed, 16 Dec 2009)
Log Message:
Fix frameworks build file that gets put in the package. Currently this won't work out of the box, there is an issue when trying to compile with static-rsls="false" the quick fix for this work is update the value of static-link-runtime-shared-libraries = true
QE notes: no
Doc notes: no
Bugs: no
Reviewer: no
Tests run: made sure the swcs all recompile within the package
Is noteworthy for integration: no
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/build_framework.xml

[svn:fx-trunk] 11193: fix packaged build file for textlayout to accommodate the recent changes made to that project

Revision: 11193
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-10-27 13:08:28 -0700 (Tue, 27 Oct 2009)
Log Message:
fix packaged build file for textlayout to accommodate the recent changes made to that project
QE notes: no
Doc notes:
Bugs: sdk-23302
Reviewer:
Tests run: checkintests
Is noteworthy for integration: no
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/sdk-23302
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/build_framework.xml

There are two main annoying problems with Flash Builder and swc's:
1. Flash Builder doesn't reflect changes made to swc files
Solution : First of all - keep your swc files inside your project folder, you can also disable global swc cache: change as3api.cpp code,refresh swc in flashBuilder bug!
2. Flash Builder breakes content inside swc files (and also popular problem "TypeError: Error #1034: Type Coercion failed: cannot convert flash.display::MovieClip@1f21adc1 to...")
Solution : locate the project .actionScriptProperties file and set useFlashSDK=”false” : Flash Builder 4.7 – useFlashSDK | In Flagrante Delicto!
In this case you can also download latest Apache Flex SDK to target new Flash player versions: http://flex.apache.org/
Hope this helps!
P.

[svn] 2203: update build.properties to 3.0.3

Revision: 2203
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-06-24 07:52:56 -0700 (Tue, 24 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
update build.properties to 3.0.3
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/build.properties

As long as you aren't in Canada. Canadian law does not allow an iTunes card to be used to purchase the new software.

[svn] 3140: Modifying build. xml to include templates in the jar from the new location.

Revision: 3140
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-09-08 09:04:17 -0700 (Mon, 08 Sep 2008)
Log Message:
Modifying build.xml to include templates in the jar from the new location.
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/antTasks/build.xml

Don't be so impatient and don't multipost! I've deleted your other thread about the same topic.

GetRuntime().exec("chmod 777 a file.txt") - does not do the intended task

Hi,
I am trying to change the permissions of file (file name has spaces) using the Runtime.getRuntime().exec() method on AIX platform. My sample code is -
import java.io.*;
public class ChangeMode
     public static void main(String[] args)
          Process p = null;
     String cmd = null;
          cmd = "chmod " + "000" + " " + "a file.txt";
          try
          p = Runtime.getRuntime().exec( cmd );
          p.waitFor();
          catch( Exception e )
          e.printStackTrace();
          System.out.println("The exit value "+p.exitValue());
In this case - I am getting exitValue of 2.
But, the strange part is that - I am able to run the command
"chmod 000 a file.txt "
from the command prompt successfully.
Any ideas what does an exitValue of 2 means and where is this program getting failed.
Thanks!
~Saurabh

Is 'a file.txt' the file name ?
If I'm right, the Runtime.exec(String cmd) method will split the given string (using spaces.)
The first token will be used a the command and the other ones as the arguments.
In your example it will call chmod with three arguments: 000, a and file.txt
In order to avoid that, you should either use the Runtime.exec(String[] cmd) method with: String[] cmd = new String[] {"chmod", "000", "a file.txt"};or try to put your file between ticks: String cmd = "chmod 000 'a file.txt'";You could have a look at this article to learn more about Runtime.exec() :
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-12-2000/jw-1229-traps.html
I hope it will help.

Will Windows Phone AppData change/Deleted if I update.aapx file with .xap in to the store

I created an universal Windows Phone application using c# xaml that have user information in the appdata 'Local'
folder.
And I published it in to store. But due to some performance issue I forced to move on to silverlightfor
updating the application.
So I need to update package .appx file
with .xap file.
Is that possible ? Will it delete data from Local app folder of the current user ?
anoop m

Hi,
you cannot downgrade a published app with version 8.1 to version 8, and you cannot downgrade an AppX Bundle to an Appx Package, or an Appx package to a XAP package.
You could updated it with a Windows Phone Silverlight 8.1 app.
After the updated, during the first access you could remove all data stored in Local Storage.

The update.exe file seems to be in the C:/User/Appdata folder as well as C:/Program file folder..is the one in appdata folder normal?

When firefox checks for update, the update.exe seems to be in 3 different locations- c:/user/appdata & c:/program file/. Am doubtful of this.Shouldn't it be only in the program files folder?Is it safe to update?

updater.exe is found in 29 location(s)
<pre><nowiki>%ProgramFiles%\Mozilla Firefox\
%ProgramFiles%\\Mozilla Firefox\
%CustomPath%\
%SystemDrive%\software\internet\Mozilla Firefox\
%ProgramFiles%\Mozilla Firefox 3 Beta 3\
%UserProfile%\\Impostazioni locali\Dati applicazioni\Mozilla\Firefox\Mozilla Firefox 3 Beta 2\updates\0\
%ProgramFiles%\Mozilla Firefox 3 Beta 4\
\%Documents and Settings%\%username%\local settings\application data\mozilla\firefox\mozilla firefox\updates\0\
%UserProfile%\\Impostazioni locali\Dati applicazioni\Mozilla\Firefox\Mozilla Firefox\updates\0\
%ProfilesDirectory%\%UserName%\Local Settings\Application Data\Mozilla\Firefox\Mozilla Firefox\updates\0\
%UserProfile%\\Local Settings\Application Data\Mozilla\Firefox\Mozilla Firefox\updates\0\
\%Documents and Settings%\%username%\appdata\local\mozilla\firefox\mozilla firefox\updates\0\
%UserProfile%\.KRAKATOA\Impostazioni locali\Dati applicazioni\Mozilla\Firefox\Mozilla Firefox\updates\0\
\%Documents and Settings%\%username%\local settings\application data\mozilla\firefox\mozilla firefox2\updates\0\
\%Documents and Settings%\%username%\local settings\application data\mozilla\firefox\mozilla firefox 3 beta 3\updates\0\
%ProfilesDirectory%\%UserName%\Ustawienia lokalne\Dane aplikacji\Mozilla\Firefox\Mozilla Firefox\updates\0\
%ProfilesDirectory%\%UserName%\Configurações locais\Dados de aplicativos\Mozilla\Firefox\Mozilla Firefox\updates\0\
%ProfilesDirectory%\%UserName%\AppData\Local\Mozilla\Firefox\Mozilla Firefox\updates\0\
%ProgramFiles%\Firefox\
%UserProfile%\\Local Settings\Data aplikací\Mozilla\Firefox\Mozilla Firefox\updates\0\
%ProfilesDirectory%\%UserName%\Lokale indstillinger\Application Data\Mozilla\Firefox\Mozilla Firefox\updates\0\
%ProfilesDirectory%\%UserName%\Ustawienia lokalne\Dane aplikacji\Mozilla\Firefox\Ffox\updates\0\
%ProfilesDirectory%\%UserName%\Local Settings\Application Data\Mozilla\Firefox\Mozilla Firefox\updates\0(2)\
%ProfilesDirectory%\%UserName%\AppData\Local\Mozilla\Firefox\other\Mozilla Firefox\updates\0\
%ProfilesDirectory%\%UserName%\Local Settings\Application Data\Mozilla\Firefox\Multimedia\Mozilla Firefox\updates\0\
%ProfilesDirectory%\%UserName%\Impostazioni locali\Dati applicazioni\Mozilla\Firefox\Mozilla Firefox\updates\0\
%ProfilesDirectory%\%username%\ConfiguraciÃ³n local\Datos de programa\Mozilla\Firefox\Mozilla Firefox\updates\0\
%SystemDrive%\DEF_K\Dk124\Mozilla Firefox\updates\0\
%SystemDrive%\Ut\firefox\
</nowiki></pre>

Updating Attached File

Please help!
I've attached a .pdf file (attachment file) to another .pdf file (source file) using the "attach a file as a comment" tool on Acrobat 9.0.
However, the problem is that I've updated the original attachment file by accessing it through the source file and saved it under a different name (updated attachment file).
I noticed when I clicked on the icon on the source file that the attachment file content is different from the content of the updated attachment file. In other words, the attachment on the source file was not synced with updated attachment file that had the changes on it.
Seeing this, I tried to find the original attachment file to update that directly. However, when I look at the properties of the original attachment file, the path leads only to the file where the source file is found.
Is there any way of accessing this original attachment file or having the changes synced when I make changes to the file that I originally attached?
Also, does the new Acrobat X have functions that would solve my problem with the "attach a file as a comment" tool?

There are no 'auto sync' features for attached files in any PDF software. Once you attach something you are creating a totally independent copy. You have to delete the attachment and add it back again.

Cannot update ipod files in use w/ itunes 7

when i am playing tracks off my 4th gen ipod through itunes 7 i kepp getting a can't update ipod files in use message when the song changes, any one else see this

Oh god. Why did i update to ITunes 7... I finally have my ipod recognised by windows, and itunes but cant restore because i get some crappy error about "The Network Connection Was Reset"
Isnt there a fix for this yet. Im afraid that if i turn my pc of i wil never be able to get my ipod to be recognised again

[svn:osmf:] 13604: Update build-config files for sample plugins.

Revision: 13604
Revision: 13604
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-01-18 17:09:32 -0800 (Mon, 18 Jan 2010)
Log Message:
Update build-config files for sample plugins.
Modified Paths:
    osmf/trunk/apps/samples/plugins/AkamaiPluginSample/AkamaiPluginSample-build-config.xml
    osmf/trunk/apps/samples/plugins/MASTSample/MASTSample-build-config.xml

Thanks Brian. I would certainly appreciate the maintenance and documentation of some of these. The one that most comes to mind is the OSMFTest suite. This would be valuable if only so that developers have some idea of the coverage that's going on under the hood. It would also help for diagnosing what's going on when behavior is not as expected. I was pleased that when I figured out how to compile this directory, I could see that there were 1109 tests, all of which passed except for one that failed due to not being on my local security whitelist.

[svn:osmf:] 13605: Update build-config files for libs.

Revision: 13605
Revision: 13605
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-01-18 17:10:01 -0800 (Mon, 18 Jan 2010)
Log Message:
Update build-config files for libs.
Modified Paths:
    osmf/trunk/libs/VAST/vast-build-config.flex
    osmf/trunk/libs/VAST/vast-build-config.flexcov
    osmf/trunk/libs/VAST/vast-build-config.xml
    osmf/trunk/libs/adobe/NetMocker/netmocker-build-config.xml

Thanks Brian. I would certainly appreciate the maintenance and documentation of some of these. The one that most comes to mind is the OSMFTest suite. This would be valuable if only so that developers have some idea of the coverage that's going on under the hood. It would also help for diagnosing what's going on when behavior is not as expected. I was pleased that when I figured out how to compile this directory, I could see that there were 1109 tests, all of which passed except for one that failed due to not being on my local security whitelist.

[svn] 1636: update the framework build file we put in the sdk pkg.

Revision: 1636
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-05-09 10:05:15 -0700 (Fri, 09 May 2008)
Log Message:
update the framework build file we put in the sdk pkg. I think this is probably going to go away, but I wanted to make sure it worked while it is still being put in.
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/build_framework.xml

Hi Kevin,
Dunno if you saw my other post to you, but I've put up a copy of the SDK that you were looking for and asked that we change our procedures going forward. As for the actual issue, would you mind creating a bug report at bugbase.adobe.com if you haven't already?
Thanks
Chris

[svn] 1363: 1) update the qa-regress build file to use 1.5 source level

Revision: 1363
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-04-23 14:02:19 -0700 (Wed, 23 Apr 2008)
Log Message:
1) update the qa-regress build file to use 1.5 source level
2) remove the duplicate MBeanServerGateway destination
3) remove a comment from the mxml
Modified Paths:
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/WEB-INF/flex/remoting-config.mods.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/build.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/proxyService/httpservice/MultiHe aderTest.mxml

Hi,
If you remove the $ and braces (as shown below) it will work.
<data-source-aliases>
<aliases>
<data-source-name>MYDS</data-source-name>
<alias>BRANCH50DS</alias>
</aliases>
</data-source-aliases>
Regards,
S.Divakar

[svn] 4036: Updating build files to pass jvmargs to the asdoc task.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for