Synchronization between multiple DAGs

Hi,
Is there any possibility that we can have synchronization between 2 DAGs. We want to have 2 DAGs in 2 sites. Replication between 2 DAGs should be realtime.
Is there any such possibility?
Thanks
Anees

Right and this is by design. Exchange will not mount the databases in Site B, because Site B doesn't had quorum. Site A still has node majority.
In that case I would look into Datacenter Activation Coordination (DAC).
Section towards the bottom titled "Enabling Database Activation Coordination Mode (DAC)"
http://www.msexchange.org/articles-tutorials/exchange-server-2010/management-administration/planning-deploying-testing-exchange-2010-site-resilient-solution-sized-medium-organization-part7.html
A later part in that series walks you through the Site Failover experience and all the pitfalls to watch out for.
http://www.msexchange.org/articles-tutorials/exchange-server-2010/management-administration/planning-deploying-testing-exchange-2010-site-resilient-solution-sized-medium-organization-part12.html
Check out my latest blog posts on www.supertekboy.com A tech blog for I.T. Superheroes.

Similar Messages

Contact synchronization between multiple Exchange accounts

I have one Exchange account to Lotus Notes and one to Gmail.
I would like two sync the two contact lists, to make sure all contacts are available if I log in to Lotus Notes on my computer or Gmail on a computer. Is it possible to make these sync to the same contact group on my Iphone?
Now all contacts are available on the phone, but they are not synced to each other.

Thanks for the clarification, this was what I feared. I guess I have to find a work around to sync it then. Anyone with good suggestions?

URGENT HELP: Synchronization of Multiple Devices

To whom it may concern,
I am relatively new to labview so I am sorry if I use the wrong terminology.
Here is all of my equipment:
DAQ USBX-6341 board.
Cameras (plugged into digital p0.0 channel/port)
Force Sensor (plugged into analog channel/port 1)
Test Machine (plugged into COM5)
Currently,I am sending in a trigger to the camera to start taking photos. This trigger takes 2 miliseconds and then the labview program tells the forcesensor and testing machine to start. This creates a delay between the camera, force sensor and testing machine. THis makes it difficult to analyze data.
I want the testing machine, cameras, and force sensor to start taking pictures at the same time. I was told that the best way to do this would be to send in a square wave at my desired sampling rate (ex. 15,000) into the DAQ. This would synchronize everything so that it started capturing data at the same time once a trigger was sent in.
Is this the easiest way to accomplish that goal? Is there an easier way to do this?
Thanks
gcass

Hi gcass,
It sounds that what you're looking for is a deterministic system response. Determinism is the ability to say that at a certain point in your program, a certain function will happen within a certain amount of time, plus or minus some variation (Jitter). On an Operating System that isn't Real Time oriented, deterministic responses i.e. getting your 2ms long trigger to execute and then simultaneously begin the acquisition can't happen; this is because the OS gets in the way because of the way it schedules tasks.
For example, the same program can have two different timed responses for when you're running no programs in the background and when you're running an Internet browser. Even when the OS isn't running any background tasks you still cannot be absolutely certain that some other processor time is being used. Unfortunately, this is the limitation of a conventional OS; the processor's power is shared between multiple competing threads which have equal priorities. Furthermore, USB devices aren't deterministic either due to the serial protocols that they follow, which in their nature are indeterministic.
You can only really implement some coarse timing in a traditional OS, whilst remembering that the absolute maximum output rate an OS could achieve is 1kHz. This is where Real Time Operating Systems come into play; these allow threads to be scheduled in a way that the co-ordination of particular tasks can occur at precise periods in time. In order to achieve the response you're after you'd need to use an RTOS based implementation; this is offered on devices such as the Compact RIO or PXI. You can learn more about these products here.
However...
I may be a little unsure about your application, so please correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe you could synchronise your DAQ tasks by driving different DAQ tasks by the same sample clock; this will allow tasks to operate simultaneously as they're both triggered by the same driving clock. I've answered a forum question with a similar implementation of driving two tasks with a single clock; the same can be done for a third task (You're trigger on the first edge).
So, the difference between these two points depends on just how you want to acquire your data; because there are limitations imposed in applications such as these with indeterministic systems. Your choice depends on how quickly you need to analyse your data; however if you only want to synchronise the output trigger and the clocking then I suggest the former solution.
I hope this helps!
Alex Thomas, University of Manchester School of EEE LabVIEW Ambassador (CLAD)

9300 synchronization of multiple contact databases...

I currently use multiple Contact databases on my 9300, such as "professional" and "personal" databases. The default one is systematically synchronized through the PC Suite into my outlook/contact database, but I know how to synchronize the other and make it go to outlook/contact2 database. Any hint would be welcome. Thanks

Hi nadjibnet,
According to your description, you want to use SQL Server replication to sync the SQL Server Express database and LocalDB database. From the comparison of SQL Server Express and LocalDB, LocalDB is the full SQL Server Express engine, but invoked directly
from the client provider. It not support subscriber for merge replication. However, you need to sync database in both directions. Only merge replication can merges incremental data changes that occurred at the Publisher or Subscribers after the initial snapshot
was created, and detects and resolves any conflicts according to rules you configure.
So personally, I recommend you use synchronize among SQL Server Express , LocalDB databases by using Microsoft Sync Framework.
Sync Framework includes classes that can be adapted to synchronize between a SQL Server database and any other database that is compatible with ADO.NET. For detailed documentation of the Sync Framework database synchronization components, see
Synchronizing Databases. For a comparison between Sync Framework and Merge Replication, see
Synchronizing Databases Overview.
Regards,
Sofiya Li
Sofiya Li
TechNet Community Support

Synchronization of multiple tracks

I have been working with Java Sound for around a month now and there is a glaring shortcoming: no synchronization for multiple tracks.
I am writing a multitrack recorder in which a recorded track can be played while the user is recording a new track. Both tracks can then be played simultaneously with the correct timing that was heard during the recording phase.
Is there a way to do this with JMF?

hacksmurf wrote:
Is there a way to do this with JMF?Ummmmm, theoretically. You can syncronize two or more controllers with JMF, and you can play multiple "tracks" of data simultaniously...but I can't guarentee that, in the end, you won't run into the same problems with JMF that you're having with JavaSound. There's a fundamental problem that, in order to play and record, you're using multiple threads and you have inherant delays between what the user hears and what the computer records.

How to ...synchronization between two databases

Hi,
I want to set up automatic synchronization between two databases. For example, database DB1 and DB2 have table t1 and t2 with the same columns. If someone updates a record in table t1, I want automatically update the record in t2 or vice-versa.
How can I make an automatic system like that?

1) What is the business goal you're trying to satisfy? Failover, reporting, replication, geographic co-location, etc. each have their own set of technologies. Explaining what you're trying to accomplish from a business perspective will help us identify which technology (or technologies) to focus on.
2) Are you synchronizing a single table? Or multiple tables? Or all the tables in a schema? Or all the tables in a database?
3) Is there a stable network connection between the boxes?
4) What version of Oracle do you have (10.2, 10.1, 9.2, 9.0.1, etc)? What edition (standard, express, enterprise, etc)?
5) How quickly after a change has been made on DB1 does the change need to reflect on DB2?
6) Am I correct in understanding that you want to be able to change the same row of data on either DB1 or DB2? So the replication needs to go in both directions?
Justin

Tool for synchronizing multiple Palm Desktops across a network

Hello, I'm new to this site but it seems as though if there's an answer to my question it's here so I'm diving right in.
I have my handheld set up to synchronize with multiple computers. I have a home desktop, work desktop, and laptop, each of which has Palm Desktop installed and knows how to sync with my handheld. Syncing any one of the PD installations is easy -- I've been able to get it to work over a variety of methods and am very happy with that.
The problem is that if (as happens frequently) I make some changes to the data on my laptop, then later some changes on my desktop, and then finally some other changes on my handheld, the only way to get all the systems in sync again is a series of hotsync operations driven by the handheld. (Three in that case.)
What I'd like to be able to do is synchronize the two PCs directly, so that I only need the handheld to be involved in the process once. I know there are tools to get PD to sync with other software like Outlook. Are there any that sync PD with PD?
Thanks for your help!
Post relates to: Treo 755p (Sprint)

Hello fruitbat and welcome to the Palm forums.
As far as I know, there are no tools from Palm or any third-parties that will sync the Palm Desktop PIM databases between two computers without the handheld being involved. Palm OS 5, Palm Desktop, and the HotSync Manager, where never intended to be network applications.
Alan G
Post relates to: Treo 755p (Sprint)

How do I use the time capsule to share itunes music between multiple apple devices? Also, is it possible to control the music on one device using another, and how do you set this up?

How do I use the time capsule to share itunes music between multiple apple devices? Also, is it possible to control the music on one device using another, and how do you set this up?

unless i'm missing something, i think you got mixed up, this is easy google for walk throughs
i'm assuming this is the new 3tb tc AC or 'tower' shape, if so, its wifi will run circles around your at&t device
unplug the at&t box for a minute and plug it back in
factory reset your tc - unplug it, hold down reset and keep holding while you plug it back in - only release reset when amber light flashes in 10-20s
connect the tc to your at&t box via eth in the wan port, wait 1 minute, open airport utility look in 'other wifi devices' to setup the tc
create a new wifi network (give it a different name than your at&t one) and put the tc in bridge mode (it may do this automatically for you, but you should double check) under the 'network' tab
login to your at&t router and disable wifi on it
add new clients to the new wifi network, and point your Macs to the time machine for backups

I setup messaging on my verizon, however I have multiple lines on the account and it is showing messaging only for one phone line. Is there a way to toggle between multiple lines on the myverizon site?

How do I toggle between multiple phone lines while on the myverizon website in regards to messaging?

The Account Owner can see the call/text logs for all lines on the account, but each line needs its own My Verizon account for messaging and backups. Those lines will be listed as Account Members and will have limited info. available to them regarding the account.

HT1198 If I share an iPhoto library between multiple users, will the Faces, Events, and Places be automatically usable by all users, or will each user have to tag all the photos (e.g. if a user tags a face, will a different user have to do it in their own

If I share an iPhoto library between multiple users, will the Faces, Events, and Places be automatically usable by all users, or will each user have to tag all the photos (e.g. if a user tags a face, will a different user have to do it in their own iPhoto application??

Have you read this Apple document regarding sharing a library with multiple users: iPhoto: Sharing libraries among multiple users?
OT

Any improvements in sharing an iPhoto Library between multiple users?

It is possible and Apple Approved to share an iPhoto Library between multiple users, but the Library must be stored on a drive or disk image that ignores permissions:
http://tech.kateva.org/2008/10/apple-supports-multi-user-iphoto.html
This doesn't work for me. Has Apple changed anything with iLife '09 to make it easier to share a Library? For example, have they changed from the prior Package format?
Message was edited by: jfaughnan

Alternatives to a trip to the Terminal:
If you want the other user to be able to see the pics, but not add to, change or alter your library, then enable Sharing in your iPhoto (Preferences -> Sharing), leave iPhoto running and use Fast User Switching to open the other account. In that account, enable 'Look For Shared Libraries'. Your Library will appear in the other source pane.
Any user can drag a pic from the Shared Library to their own in the iPhoto Window.
Remember iPhoto must be running in both accounts for this to work.
If you want the other user to have the same access to the library as you: to be able to add, edit, organise, keyword etc. The problem here is that OS X works very hard to keep your data safe and secure from the other users. You're trying to beat what's built in to the system. So, to beat the system
Quit iPhoto in both accounts
Move the iPhoto Library Folder to an external HD set to ignore permissions. You could also use a Disk Image or even partition your Hard Disk.
In each account in turn: Hold down the option (or alt) key and launch iPhoto. From the resulting dialogue, select 'Choose Library' and navigate to the new library location. From that point on, this will be the default library location. Both accounts will have full access to the library, in fact, both accounts will 'own' it.
However, there is a catch with this system and it is a significant one. iPhoto is not a multi-user app., it does not have the code to negotiate two users simultaneously writing to the database, and trying will cause db corruption. So only one user at a time, and back up, back up back up.
Lastly: This method seems a little clunky at first, but works very well. Most importantly, it uses the System to do the job for you.
Create a new Account on your Mac, call it Media. Create an iPhoto Library there. (BTW: This will work for iTunes too.)
Enable Sharing on the Library:(Preferences -> Sharing), leave iPhoto running and use Fast User Switching to open the other accounts. In those accounts, enable 'Look For Shared Libraries'. The Library will appear in the other source pane.
This means that both users will be able to see the pics. If you want to use a pic then simply drag it from the shared Library to your own in the iPhoto Window. This means that each user can have their own edits.
If you want to add photos to the Library: Log into the Media account for that purpose.
To make it all seamless: Set your Mac to log into the Media Account automatically. Set iPhoto to launch on log-in. Then switch to your own account using Fast User Switching.
Net result: a Library that's permanently available to all users but also protected. Each user can have their own versions of the pics if they want.
No partitioning, no permissions issues. Uses no extra disk space. What's not to like?
Regards
TD

Question/Problem Sharing iTunes Library between multiple users

Hello all,
I have a question (potential problem) regarding sharing an iTunes Library between multiple users.
In the past, I had placed the iTunes folder in /Users/Shared, and created an alias to it in the "Music" folder of each user, and it worked fine. However, with a recent upgrade to Mac OS 10.5, only the Home user account can access the library.
I read the Apple Support Document http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1203 uner Mac OS X which specifically states *not* to move the iTunes folder, just the iTunes Media folder (which I don't have, would that be iTunes Music?).
Any recommendations? Should I delete the different alias, move the iTunes folder back to the home user, and then follow the instructions in the support document?
We're also looking to sync music purchsed on our iPod touches, as well as apps (which weren't supported in our privous Mac OS X version.
Any advice is appreiciated.

David Guay wrote:
... iTunes Media folder (which I don't have, would that be iTunes Music?).
yes.
specifically states *not* to move the iTunes folder
*do* keep the entire iTunes folder in /users/shared, however, instead of creating aliases, launch iTunes while holding the option (⌥) key, click choose library when prompted, and select the iTunes folder in /users/shared.
obviously, only one iTunes at a time can access the library !

Using home sharing, can you sync libraries between multiple users in a household?

Using home sharing, can you sync libraries between multiple users in a household?

Hey lindsay146,
Home Sharing lets you to stream or transfer music, movies, and more with up to five authorized computers in your household. You can learn more about it in this link:
Understanding Home Sharing
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3819
Welcome to Apple Support Communities!
All the best,
Delgadoh

MobileMe and working on a site between multiple Macs

In an article I was reading, the following was noted:
iDisk balks at file packages like iWeb's Domain.sites2 file, making it +difficult for MobileMe users to work on an iWeb site between multiple Macs+.
Does that mean working at the same time? Or, if for example I'm doing my site on my personal iMac, and then went to college or wanted to work on a MacBook for instance, cannot I complete working on my site through MobileMe?
I may not be getting it clear.
Thanks.

if for example I'm doing my site on my personal iMac, and then went to college or wanted to work on a MacBook for instance, cannot I complete working on my site through MobileMe?
The point is that to work on an iWeb site with two computers, both must have a copy of the Domain file. There are various ways to do that, like using a memory stick or Dropbox. But uploading and downloading from MobileMe is most likely not practical.

How can I sync my purchased audiobooks between multiple computers?

How can I sync my purchased audiobooks between multiple computers? The new iCloud feature seems to make it possible to sync all my other content (purchased from iTunes) but there is no way/option for audiobooks. Any clues?

Copy them to a disk/hard drive/flash drive/etc, then copy it to the other computer.

Synchronization between multiple DAGs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for