Synonym for Package?

Is it a standard practice to create PUBLIC SYNONYMS for Packages? Like
CREATE PUBLIC SYNONYM <synonym_for_package> FOR <package_name>;

Is it a standard practice to create PUBLIC SYNONYMS
for Packages? Like
CREATE PUBLIC SYNONYM <synonym_for_package>
FOR <package_name>;The practice is to create synonyms for database objects on other schemas where you want to reference them locally without having to specify the schema name. It's not specific to packages.
If there's no need to create the synonym then don't do it.

Similar Messages

Synonyms for packaged procedures

Heres something that is currently bothering me.
Why are we not allowed to create synonyms for procedures and functions within packages ?
Our database has too many individual procedures and functions for my liking and I would like to move some of them into packages. Consequently I want to create synonyms to avoid changing application code.
I have found metalink note 1061643.6 which confirms this cannot be done, but it also goes on to say:
"Oracle does this using the STANDARD package with overloaded functions and procedures such as TO_CHAR() and TO_DATE(), but how Oracle does this is proprietary information and is not available to the public."
(Thanks Oracle)

The basic reason for this restriction is that the Oracle synonyms are alternative names only for database objects, not for PL/SQL objects like packaged function and procedures.
But moving stored procedures/functions to packages is a good idea, recommended by all the experts, with many benefits for you in the future.
There is a simple solution for you problem, with very little impact on the continuity or performance of your applications:
1. Copy the code of the DB stored procedures and functions to PL/SQL packages, mirroring them into packages subprograms.
2. Replace the body of the DB procedures and functions with plain calls to their packages equivalents, transforming them effectively into wrappers behaving like synonyms.
3. Change gradually the code of the application to call directly the packages functions and procedures
4. When the change is completed, delete the wrappers.
BTW If Oracle does not support a feature, than you it's better not to use it. Modifying the STANDARD package or using some volatile, undocumented features is not a clever move...

How to declare synonym for a package function with a DBLink

Hi,
I have a PL/SQL package 'pkg'
and a function in the package 'func'
at another db using a dblink.
How to I create the correct syntax to create the synonym for this package and function.
create synonym --- for ---@dblink
Thanks.

CREATE SYNONYM <name> FOR <OWNER>.<OBJECT>@<DB_LINK>
{code}
the object in this case would be pkg.func
Edited by: Tyson Jouglet on Sep 25, 2008 5:12 PM

Creating SYNONYM for all tables who don't have one at once!

Hello to all,
I'm trying to create synonyms for every table who's missing one at the moment. I'm trying this code:
declare
cursor cur_objects is
select obj.object_name , obj.owner
from all_objects obj
where owner = '&&SCHEMA_OWNER'
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT *
FROM all_synonyms syn
WHERE obj.object_name = syn.table_name)
AND obj.object_type = 'TABLE'
AND obj.object_name LIKE 'CI_%';
begin
for rec_objects in cur_objects loop
begin
dbms_output.put_line(rec_objects.object_name);
execute immediate('create public synonym ' || rec_objects.object_name || ' for '
|| rec_objects.owner ||'.'||rec_objects.object_name )
exception when others then
null;
end;
end loop;
end;
I'm getting this error:
ORA-06550: line 10, column 37:
PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "end-of-file" when expecting one of the following:
begin function package pragma procedure subtype type use
<een ID>
<een scheidingsteken-ID tussen dubbele aanhalingstekens> form
current cursor
I'm still pretty new at PL/SQL and can't get it to work. Does anyone got any tips ?
Thnx already

Ok now I got this error:
RA-06550: line 17, column 1:
PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "EXCEPTION" when expecting one of the following:
* & = - + ; < / > at in is mod remainder not rem return
returning <een exponent (**)> <> or != or ~= >= <= <> and or
like LIKE2_ LIKE4_ LIKEC_ between into overlaps using ||
multiset bulk year DAY_ member SUBMULTISET_
The symbol ";" was substituted for "EXCEPTION" to continue.

View + stored function + synonym for other user

Dear All!
I've got a quite strange problem which I cannot decide whether it's caused by my lack of knowledge on the appropriate topic or by an Oracle bug. I'm already after some heavy googling on the topic and I was unable to track any valuable answers neither in forums nor in the Oracle documentation. I'll try to be as short and specific as possible.
Database: Oracle 10g
Result of "SELECT BANNER FROM V$VERSION":
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
"CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production"
TNS for Solaris: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
I have two users in the database for a single Web application: UAPP01, which is the owner of application DB objects and UAPP02 which is the application user connecting to the DB. The application runs for quite many years by now and DB structure layout has always been following a simple logic: for each DB object used by the app. (tables, views, packages and stored procedures/functions) and found in the UAPP01 there exists a synonym in the UAPP02 schema. For the privileges to be set correctly a role is created: RL_MY_APPL which is granted the necessary privileges on objects of UAPP01 (CRUD on tables, SELECT on views, EXECUTE on procedures, etc..). This role is granted to UAPP02.
In the previous days I was about to extend the DB with a view that invokes a stored function. This pattern has already occured in the DB previously so I kept following existing conventions: I've created the stored function and the view in the UAPP01 schema, granted SELECT on the view to RL_MY_APPL and created the synonym for it in the UAPP02 schema. This is where the entire functionality began to act strange. I'll try to explain with a simplified example that was sufficient to reproduce the problem:
REM ========================================
REM Execute below code as UAPP01 user.
REM ========================================
REM Test function.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION testfunction(p_param NUMBER) RETURN NUMBER IS
BEGIN
RETURN p_param *2;
END;
REM Testview version 1. causing trouble.
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW testview AS
WITH testdata AS
SELECT /*+ materialize*/ LEVEL AS d
FROM dual CONNECT BY LEVEL <= 100
SELECT a, b, c, SUM(d) AS sum_d
FROM
SELECT FLOOR(dbms_random.VALUE(1, 100)) a, FLOOR(dbms_random.VALUE(1, 100)) b, FLOOR(dbms_random.VALUE(1, 100)) c, testfunction(d) AS d
FROM testdata
GROUP BY CUBE(a, b, c)
REM Testview version 2. not causing trouble.
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW testview AS
SELECT a, b, c, SUM(d) AS sum_d
FROM
SELECT FLOOR(dbms_random.VALUE(1, 100)) a, FLOOR(dbms_random.VALUE(1, 100)) b, FLOOR(dbms_random.VALUE(1, 100)) c, testfunction(d) AS d
FROM
SELECT LEVEL AS d FROM dual CONNECT BY LEVEL <= 100
GROUP BY (a, b, c)
REM Synonym.
CREATE OR REPLACE SYNONYM UAPP02.testview FOR UAPP01.testview;
REM Grants.
GRANT SELECT ON testview TO RL_MY_APPL;
When creating TESTVIEW with the 1 ^st^ version I cannot query it using the UAPP02 user, I'm constantly getting the error: ORA-00904: : invalid identifier. However, when I use the 2 ^nd^ version everything runs perfectly. What is common in the two cases is that both versions use the TESTFUNCTION function. I have not granted the EXECUTE rights on TESTFUNCTION to the RL_MY_APPL since it was never needed previously (for other views using stored functions) and as far as I know it's not necessary (as both the view and the function are owned by UAPP01). The strange thing in the above behaviour is that the function is used by both versions, however only one of them fails. This is where I thought it's not a granting issue, otherwise neither of the versions would have worked and I think I would have received a different error stating that UAPP02 lacks the necessary privileges on underlying objects of the view.
As I further digged into the problem by examining the EXPLAIN PLAN output for the two versions I found that version 1. leads to a TEMP TABLE TRANSFORMATION and to MULTI TABLE INSERTs, whereas version 2. simply executes the query without doing such things. In my setup I presume the MULTI TABLE INSERTs were caused by the GROUP BY CUBE. When I simply removed the CUBE and used only GROUP BY the TEMP TABLE TRANSFORMATION remained in place but the MULTI TABLE INSERTs disappeared. As a result of this small modification the view again began to work when I executed it through the synonym and using the UAPP02 user.
With the original DB objects of our application the behaviour is even more strange: the error comes up if I select from the view and filter for a column that is grouped in the query whereas it works correctly if I filter for the aggregated columns. However, I couldn't reproduce this with the above simplified example.
No problem occurs with any of the versions if I query the view using the UAPP01 user.
This hectic behaviour made me suspect that the TEMP TABLE TRANSFORMATION + MULTI TABLE INSERT + synonym + stored function combo appears to bring a strange Oracle bug to the surface...
As a final note: when executing GRANT EXECUTE ON TESTFUNCTION TO RL_MY_APPL everything works fine in all cases. I know I could simply live with this but I'd really like to get to the bottom of this. Although this extra GRANT appears to solve the problem I don't really trust it. I'd really like to avoid the bug emerging again in Production in case this extra GRANT were not sufficient due to some unknown misteries.
Excuse me, the post has become a bit lengthy. Thanks in advance for anyone who's willing to read through and answer it!
Regards,
Krisztian Balazs Szaniszlo

The error is thrown at run-time and only for the UAPP02 (second) user.
The problem is that the appearance of errors is independent of whether the query contains the call to the stored function or not.
So far I thought that if I use a stored function indirectly, like in this setup: UAPP02.synonym -> UAPP01.view -> UAPP01.stored function, then I don't need the grant. Of course, I understand that if I had used it directly, like :UAPP02.synonym -> UAPP01.stored function then I'd need the GRANT EXECUTE.
Shall I just ignore the strange behaviour and go on by adding GRANT EXECUTE privilege on all the functions used indirectly through views? It seems to solve the problem, but this behaviour is disturbing me quite and I fear the real root cause of the problem can emerge later in a different fashion.

PL/SQL, synonyms to packages and name resolution

I have some question about name resolution in PL/SQL. First, I need to describe situation, because it is quite complicated.
There are three schemas: A1, B1 and O. A1 and B1 are containing proprietary software and I cannot modify objects there (but I can modify configuration tables, so in this way I can call any package from anyhere). O schema is my own schema. A1 and B1 schemas are in one "module", there are also A2 and B2 schemas in second "module" and AN and BN in n-th "module".
In normal situation, A1 schema contains synonym to package B1.PKG (on B1 schema) and uses it to call B1.PKG with DEFINER rights. The same for every "module".
I need to extend some functionality of B.PKG by buliding some kind of "wrapper" on my own O schema. It is only one MY_PKG and should be used by every "module". In this place I need some kind of magic :)
I want to place package MY_PKG with AUTH_ID CURRENT_USER clause on my O schema and use A1..AN schema to call it. Package MY_PKG have to call package placed on one of B1..BN schemas, so I need to create synonym on O schema for package, for example, B1.PKG just to compile the MY_PKG package.
Now, I call MY_PKG package from A1 schema and I expect MY_PKG will use synonym to B1.PKG placed on A1 schema, instead of using synonym on my O schema. That's not happening. MY_PKG still uses synonym on O schema, so it ruins whole concept :)
Actually, I use some set of packages that already work properly in that way, but there is some difference. In my other packages I use SQL and synonyms to tables and views placed on _one_ A schema. I use those synonyms only for compiling. When packages are calling from A1..AN schemas, they use proper objects on proper A1..AN schema. In this case I try to do the same, but with package instead of tables and view. I find it difficult probably because SQL and PLSQL resolves names in other way.
Here is the question, is it possible to make such thing as decribed above? Of course, I can use execute immediate to run proper packages directly from O schema, but I don't want :)
Sorry for my bad english, I hope you understand whole concept.
DB version: 11.2.0.3

The documentation is pretty clear that invoker rights applies only to certain statements...
Using PL/SQL Subprograms
SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE data manipulation statements
The LOCKTABLE transaction control statement
OPEN and OPEN-FOR cursor control statements
EXECUTEIMMEDIATE and OPEN-FOR-USING dynamic SQL statements
SQL statements parsed using DBMS_SQL.PARSE()
So clearly static PL/SQL references will not be resolved in this way.
I can't actually remember (I have found AUTHID CURRENT_USER to be very rarely useful) but you may be able to get around this by executing dynamic PL/SQL blocks but given the potential downsides of dynamic SQL and PL/SQL you almost certainly don't want to.

Public Synonyms for Nested Tables - Insertion Problem

Hi,
we are facing a problem during implementation. Our DB set up
is , we will be having two schema named OWNR and COPY.
In the schema, OWNR we have to create all the tables,
types,procedures, packages and obj.....This schema will have
both DDL and DML privileges.
In the schema, COPY we are not supposed to create any tables,
objects. We have to create public synonyms for all the tables,
types, procedures... in OWNR and grant ALL privilege to the
schema COPY.The schema, COPY will have only DML privileges.
The problem is we have some nested tables in our application.
When I try to insert into the synonym which is created for the
nested table, it is not allowing me to insert..The whole
implementation is stucked..Please help.The scripts are given
below.......
We have a type name SITA_ADDRESS_TY which is used by the nested
table SITA_ADDRESSES_NT.Script used for creating the Type,Nested
table,Table, Public Synonym and granting all privilege to these
types and tables are
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE SITA_ADDRESS_TY AS OBJECT (
SITA_ADDRESS VARCHAR2(10),
REMARKS VARCHAR2(100)) ;
PROMPT SITA_ADDRESSS_NT...
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE SITA_ADDRESSES_NT AS TABLE OF
SITA_ADDRESS_TY ;
Using this nested table we have created the table,
UMS_SITA_ADDRESS
CREATE TABLE UMS_SITA_ADDRESS (
COMPANY_CODE VARCHAR2 (6) NOT NULL,
AIRLINE_CODE VARCHAR2 (6) NOT NULL,
DESTINATION VARCHAR2 (6) NOT NULL,
SITA_ADDRESS SITA_ADDRESSES_NT)
TABLESPACE EKUMDAT
PCTFREE 5
PCTUSED 40
INITRANS 1
MAXTRANS 255
STORAGE (
INITIAL 64K
NEXT 64K
PCTINCREASE 0
MINEXTENTS 1
MAXEXTENTS 505
FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 )
NOCACHE
NESTED TABLE SITA_ADDRESS STORE AS UMSNT_SITA_ADDRESS ;
PROMPT SYNONYM SITA_ADDRESS_TY...
CREATE PUBLIC SYNONYM SITA_ADDRESS_TY FOR SITA_ADDRESS_TY
PROMPT SYNONYM SITA_ADDRESSES_NT...
CREATE PUBLIC SYNONYM SITA_ADDRESSES_NT FOR SITA_ADDRESSES_NT
PROMPT UMS_SITA_ADDRESS...
CREATE PUBLIC SYNONYM UMS_SITA_ADDRESS FOR UMS_SITA_ADDRESS
Granting Privileges
PROMPT SITA_ADDRESS_TY...
GRANT EXECUTE ON SITA_ADDRESS_TY TO COPY
PROMPT SITA_ADDRESSS_NT...
GRANT EXECUTE ON SITA_ADDRESSES_NT TO COPY
PROMPT UMS_SITA_ADDRESS...
GRANT ALL ON UMS_SITA_ADDRESS TO COPY
When I connect to copy and desc UMS_SITA_ADDRESS, the structure
is
SQL> desc ums_sita_address
Name Null? Type
COMPANY_CODE NOT NULL VARCHAR2(6)
AIRLINE_CODE NOT NULL VARCHAR2(6)
DESTINATION NOT NULL VARCHAR2(6)
SITA_ADDRESS
OWNR.SITA_ADDRESSES_NT
Why is it so??. Even though I have a synonym for
SITA_ADDRESSES_NT, it is not referencing the synonym but instead
refer the OWNR.SITA_ADDRESSES_NT
Because of this when I try to insert into ums_sita_address(in
schema COPY), it is giving the following error,
SQL> insert into ums_sita_address values
('EK','EK','DXB',SITA_ADDRESSES_NT());
insert into ums_sita_address values
('EK','EK','DXB',SITA_ADDRESSES_NT())
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes
But when the same connect to OWNR and try to insert with the
same stmt, it is inserting...
Our middle tier can connect only to COPY schema alone..Is there
anything to be done in the DBA side to achieve this??.
Please help from your valuabe experience...Or can you ask your
collegues if they have got a soln to this probs..Our
implementation team is stucked with this...
Thanks
Priya

Hi
I am not sure but maybe you need to use this command:
SQL> insert into ums_sita_address values
('EK','EK','DXB',SITA_ADDRESSES_TY());
SITA_ADDRESSES_TY() instead SITA_ADDRESSES_NT
Regards

Public Synonyms for Nested Tables - Insertion Problem - Please Help!!!!!

Hi,
we are facing a problem during implementation. Our DB set up
is , we will be having two schema named OWNR and COPY.
In the schema, OWNR we have to create all the tables,
types,procedures, packages and obj.....This schema will have
both DDL and DML privileges.
In the schema, COPY we are not supposed to create any tables,
objects. We have to create public synonyms for all the tables,
types, procedures... in OWNR and grant ALL privilege to the
schema COPY.The schema, COPY will have only DML privileges.
The problem is we have some nested tables in our application.
When I try to insert into the synonym which is created for the
nested table, it is not allowing me to insert..The whole
implementation is stucked..Please help.The scripts are given
below.......
We have a type name SITA_ADDRESS_TY which is used by the nested
table SITA_ADDRESSES_NT.Script used for creating the Type,Nested
table,Table, Public Synonym and granting all privilege to these
types and tables are
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE SITA_ADDRESS_TY AS OBJECT (
SITA_ADDRESS VARCHAR2(10),
REMARKS VARCHAR2(100)) ;
PROMPT SITA_ADDRESSS_NT...
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE SITA_ADDRESSES_NT AS TABLE OF
SITA_ADDRESS_TY ;
Using this nested table we have created the table,
UMS_SITA_ADDRESS
CREATE TABLE UMS_SITA_ADDRESS (
COMPANY_CODE VARCHAR2 (6) NOT NULL,
AIRLINE_CODE VARCHAR2 (6) NOT NULL,
DESTINATION VARCHAR2 (6) NOT NULL,
SITA_ADDRESS SITA_ADDRESSES_NT)
TABLESPACE EKUMDAT
PCTFREE 5
PCTUSED 40
INITRANS 1
MAXTRANS 255
STORAGE (
INITIAL 64K
NEXT 64K
PCTINCREASE 0
MINEXTENTS 1
MAXEXTENTS 505
FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 )
NOCACHE
NESTED TABLE SITA_ADDRESS STORE AS UMSNT_SITA_ADDRESS ;
PROMPT SYNONYM SITA_ADDRESS_TY...
CREATE PUBLIC SYNONYM SITA_ADDRESS_TY FOR SITA_ADDRESS_TY
PROMPT SYNONYM SITA_ADDRESSES_NT...
CREATE PUBLIC SYNONYM SITA_ADDRESSES_NT FOR SITA_ADDRESSES_NT
PROMPT UMS_SITA_ADDRESS...
CREATE PUBLIC SYNONYM UMS_SITA_ADDRESS FOR UMS_SITA_ADDRESS
Granting Privileges
PROMPT SITA_ADDRESS_TY...
GRANT EXECUTE ON SITA_ADDRESS_TY TO COPY
PROMPT SITA_ADDRESSS_NT...
GRANT EXECUTE ON SITA_ADDRESSES_NT TO COPY
PROMPT UMS_SITA_ADDRESS...
GRANT ALL ON UMS_SITA_ADDRESS TO COPY
When I connect to copy and desc UMS_SITA_ADDRESS, the structure
is
SQL> desc ums_sita_address
Name Null? Type
COMPANY_CODE NOT NULL VARCHAR2(6)
AIRLINE_CODE NOT NULL VARCHAR2(6)
DESTINATION NOT NULL VARCHAR2(6)
SITA_ADDRESS
OWNR.SITA_ADDRESSES_NT
Why is it so??. Even though I have a synonym for
SITA_ADDRESSES_NT, it is not referencing the synonym but instead
refer the OWNR.SITA_ADDRESSES_NT
Because of this when I try to insert into ums_sita_address(in
schema COPY), it is giving the following error,
SQL> insert into ums_sita_address values
('EK','EK','DXB',SITA_ADDRESSES_NT());
insert into ums_sita_address values
('EK','EK','DXB',SITA_ADDRESSES_NT())
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes
But when the same connect to OWNR and try to insert with the
same stmt, it is inserting...
Our middle tier can connect only to COPY schema alone..Is there
anything to be done in the DBA side to achieve this??.
Please help from your valuabe experience...Or can you ask your
collegues if they have got a soln to this probs..We are stucked
with this...
Thanks
Priya

Hi
I am not sure but maybe you need to use this command:
SQL> insert into ums_sita_address values
('EK','EK','DXB',SITA_ADDRESSES_TY());
SITA_ADDRESSES_TY() instead SITA_ADDRESSES_NT
Regards

Create a public synonym for a db link - "Connection desccriptor not found".

I want to create a public synonym for a db link.
The existing db link name is tst.world ( which is in db links table and is working fine).
I created the following db link using the following command:
create public synonym "syn.world" for "tst.world";
It created the synonym successfully.
If I try the following, it throws error "Connection desccriptor not found".
select * from [email protected];
It says "Connection desccriptor not found".
Any suggestions.
Thanks in Advance.

Well then, lookup the Documentation on the CREATE SYNONYM statement in the SQL Language Reference manual.
The documentation lists the types of objects which you can create synonyms for.
You can create synonyms for objects referenced across DBLinks.
You cannot create synonyms for DBLinks.
Hemant K Chitale

Standard Smartform for label printing for packages - pls advice

Hi All,
I need help in changing a print program ie Standard Smartform for label printing for packages ?
Standard Driver program: SDPACKDR
Please provide me with the detailed steps for editing the Std Smartform according to any requirement.
Points will be rewarded promptly.
Thanks.

hi,
1. The smartform name is SD_PACK_ETIK.
2.Just copy the standard program into Zprogram and make chanes and assign in NACE with the form.
3.But,in smartform lable printing is not possible.
4.you can print barcodes.
Regards,
Kumar(Reward if helpful).

Error while running Re-create grants and synonyms for APPS schema

Hi,
I have upgraded customer's Oracle Apps 11i (11.5.10) database to Oracle 10g R2. While executing '+Re-create grants and synonyms+ ' as given in Note: 362203.1, I am gettng error:
plus80 -s APPS/***** @E:\EBSTEST\ebstestappl\ad\11.5.0\admin\sql\adappsgs.pls &systempwd 1 INV APPLSYS APPS TRUE FALSE TRUE
Error:
Program exited with status 3
Cause: The program terminated, returning status code 3.
Action: Check your installation manual for the meaning of this code on this operating system.Connected.
old 2: ad_apps_private.create_grants_and_synonyms(&2,'&3','&4','&5','FALSE');
new 2: ad_apps_private.create_grants_and_synonyms(1,'INV','APPLSYS','APPS','FALSE');
begin
*+
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-20000: ORA-00955: name is already used by an existing
object:create_grants_and_synonyms(1,INV,APPLSYS,APPS): create_base_gs(INV,APPS): In Synonyms
Loop:create_synonym(INV,MTL_ONHAND_DISCREPANCY,APPS,MTL_ONHAND_DISCREPANCY):
do_apps_ddl(APPS,CREATE SYNONYM "MTL_ONHAND_DISCREPANCY" FOR INV."MTL_ONHAND_DISCREPANCY"):
ORA-06512: at line 5
MTL_ONHAND_DISCREPANCIES
I checked the database and there isn't MTL_ONHAND_DISCREPANCY synonym. But there is MTL_ONHAND_DISCREPANCIES synonym.
This is an upgraded instance from 11.0.3 and first time I am running Re-create grants and synonyms for APPS schema.
Plz let me know if anyone of you faced this issue.
Rgds,
Thiru

Hi,
there is no such table MTL_ONHAND_DISCREPANCY or synonym in Applications 11.5.10.2. Is that custom table created in your db?
After dropping this table from APPS schema 'Re-create grants and synonyms for APPS schema' went thru fine.Its correct
This table does not exist in INV schema in 11.5.10.2.
Could be possible that the consultant could have created this table in INV and APPS schema by mistake or whatever.Yes, with the same name, there might be table in APPS SCHEMA. When you run recreate grants and synonyms, adadmin tries to create synonym for that table in APPS schema. since there is object available with the same name in apps chema, you got that error.

Could not find the policy in WMI for package

Hi,
I am trying to deploy a language pack to a windows 8.1 machine and it is not installing. According to the execmgr.log it cannot find the policy in WMI? I have tried running the machine policy update within CFG MGR but no change. Is there something else
I can check?
<![LOG[Policy is updated for Program: InstallEN, Package: LIA002A0, Advert: LIA2011A]LOG]!><time="09:47:18.345+300" date="01-28-2015" component="execmgr" context="" type="1" thread="980"
file="execreqmgr.cpp:7063">
<![LOG[Raising client SDK event for class CCM_Program, instance CCM_Program.PackageID="LIA002A0",ProgramID="InstallEN", actionType 45l, value NULL, user NULL, session 4294967295l, level 0l, verbosity 30l]LOG]!><time="09:47:18.347+300"
date="01-28-2015" component="execmgr" context="" type="1" thread="980" file="event.cpp:405">
<![LOG[Mandatory execution requested for program InstallEN and advertisement LIA2011A]LOG]!><time="09:47:19.220+300" date="01-28-2015" component="execmgr" context="" type="1" thread="3684"
file="execreqmgr.cpp:3527">
<![LOG[Creating mandatory request for advert LIA2011A, program InstallEN, package LIA002A0]LOG]!><time="09:47:19.220+300" date="01-28-2015" component="execmgr" context="" type="1" thread="3684"
file="execreqmgr.cpp:3653">
<![LOG[Could not find the policy in WMI for package LIA002A0 program InstallEN]LOG]!><time="09:47:19.242+300" date="01-28-2015" component="execmgr" context="" type="2" thread="3684" file="softdistpolicy.cpp:2851">
<![LOG[CreateMandatoryRequestRecursively failed at FindUserOrSystemPolicy InstallEN]LOG]!><time="09:47:19.243+300" date="01-28-2015" component="execmgr" context="" type="2" thread="3684"
file="execreqmgr.cpp:3670">

Did you check this
post?
It turned out the root cause of the problem was one of the packages that the TS called. Even though SCCM had been set to use the selected distribution points and said the package was installed on those DPs, it hadn't actually copied the files over.
Updating to a new source version and ensuring the files copied correctly resolved the issue. Hopefully SCCM 2012 will do a better job of communicating a dependency problem, but I haven't had a chance to test it yet.
You can also check this
post.
it appears the majority of these messages occur when you have a system that has an expired advertisement still being applied to it.
Nick Pilon | Blog : System Center Dudes

Goods Receipt for packaging material - Item cat. ELP

Hi expert,
I am facing a problem regarding receive Packaging Material Item i MIGO via inbound. Problem detail as below hope you can advise me:
1. I create PO order 1pc of Throttle
2. In Inbound Delivery Screen I do Packing for Throttle by using Handling Unit Function, packaging Material is Carton Box.
3. After Pack complete, Item for packaging material is auto generated in inbound screen:
- Item Cat. of Throttle = ELN
- Item Cat. of Carton Box (Packaging Material) = ELP
4. When i do MIGO via Inbound: there is only 1 item for Throttle is displayed. How to do Goods Receipt for Carton Box item? Do i Miss any setting for that?
Thanks.

i thnk u sould maintain material master with two units one is throttle and second is cartoon.
u shud maintain that how many throttle is equal to 1 cartoon.
this u can maintain directlt in PO (In condition tab, with these two field : OUN and UN). in PO as a OUN ,give throttle n UN , give cartoon in item overview as well as condition tab.
and during delivery change the unit in cartoon. then while migo, material will show in cartoon.
hope it will be helpful.
Thanks
Nisha

Urgent:Material Type for Packaging Material in WM and MM

Hi
There is a place in SPRO where i can define the material type for packaging.
Logistics - General -> Handling Unit Management -> Basics -> Define Packaging Material Types
How can i create a material using this material type? What is the use of material type here?
Whenever i create material in MM01/MM41, i get the standard material type list.
Thanks & REgards
Kapil

Hi,
In T.code: OMS2, you can get standard material type list.VERP is the standard material type for packing material.You can copy VERP and rename to ur material type( as it is ur business requriement or else u can use same VERP)
What is the use of material type here?
With the help of ur Material Type , u can craete material like The material type,will be used while defining the material
master.At that time,in Tcode:MM01,first screen we need to
mention,(material type)it show the nature of material
ex:-engineering product,finished products,semifinished
product,etc.,
It also play vital role on material numbering,material type in comination with plant & valuation class, play vital role in inventory & accoputning.
To Create Material,use t. Code: MM01,
Step-1
Enter Material Code: ( example-Polythene Bag, If External Number Range or leave it blnak)
Enter Industry Sector: ...................
Enter Material Type: ..........................(VERP- Packing)
Step-2
Select
Views you required( like eample:basic data-1, like basic data-2,purachsing, purchase order text,General plant data, accounting-1, accounting-2 etc)
Step-3
Enter Plant,
Enter Storage location
{{{Enter Sales organization & Distribution channel(if sales view selected)}}}
Step-4
You will have views like (example-1, basic data, enter Base unit of measure, material group and other details as required field,example-2,Accounting data, enter valuation class, price control; S or V & price)
Step-5
Save.
Note: Before creation material you must know which Industry Sector, Material Type ur going to use and material numbering is internal or external.
For more, check the following link for creation of material
http://www.synactive.com/docu_e/doc_multi_mm01.html
Regards,
Biju K

Batch management separately for packaging / fuel material

Hi experts,
to be very clear , batch management is activated for all type of materials like raw material and finished goods.
For packaging material and fuel material i didnt activate batch management.
my issue is to maintain batch for packaging and fuel material with batch no. separately.
if any customization or through any exits / badi ?
i also maintain for stock at batch level .
regards
dks

Hi,
If batch is not activated for Material type packaging / fuel material...and stock /PO/GRN/IV exists for those material, then its impossible to to acitivate batches for those materials whose stock /PO/GRN/IV exists ...
If you want to maintain batches for these material types then you have to reverse all documents and you have to clear all stocks, which will be tedious job.
Better from future when ever you create new material for those material types, then activate the batch management check box.

Synonym for Package?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for