T-code CJ88 role authorization using company code?

Hi expert!
who can tell me how to control CJ88 T-code using company code .
the business is below:
1, the user have 10 company code and only one control ares.
2, one employee cannot use CJ88 to settlement the project of the other company code.
can any one tell me how can i control
Please explain me all the steps to be required.
Thanks in advance!

I am not sure about CoCode wise authorization for CJ88...you said you have 10Cocodes, if the Person Responsible of the projects are different for each cocode, then use authorization object C_PROJ_VNR (Project Manager for Proj Def) or C_PRPS_VNR(project manager for WBSE) for running CJ88, so that person repsonsible of other company code project cannot run settlement of other projects.

Similar Messages

Steps Required for Deleting Un - Used Company codes

Hi
My client Requirement is Un - Used Company codes need to remove from Production Environment.
What is the Steps Require for Remove Company codes.
Regards,
TML

Follow This T.Codes:
OBR1
OBR2
OKKS
OKC3
KL14
0KE5
0KE1
0KE2
KCH2
KS14
KSH3
KA24
KAH2
OKKP
EC03
EC02
EC04
EC01
Regards,
Viswa

I have a Adobe Creative Cloud's code, this is alphanumeric, but the registry only works with numeric codes ¿where i can use my code?.

Hi, i have a problem with my Adobe Creative Cloud's code, this is alphanumeric, but the registry only works with numeric codes ¿where i can use my code? is a year-long Creative Cloud subscription.

You most likely have a redemption code... especially if you did not buy direct from Adobe
Redemption Code http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/redemption-code-help.html
-or https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1572504

CO authorizations by company code

Dear all,
I am looking for a solution to the following requirement: given is
1 CO Area for mutliple company codes
Authorization shall be given to the controller for MOVEMENT DATA only for the company code he works for. So this could be controlled via RESPAREA in authorization object K_CCA. However, the same user shall be able to see ALL cost center hierarchies (standard and alternative hierarchies) and ALL cost center master data for all company codes. Thus RESPAREA would need a "*" with the effect that movement data can then be seen also from all company codes.
Any idea how to resolve this, e.g. by using another authorization object or value? Thanks in advance.
Peter
Moderator: You'd better ask this in Security forum. As soon as you do, I'll close this thread

Hi,
I guess you should be able to control the authorisations with a single User ID.
Follow the below steps :
1. Create a new Role for the user.
2. In the Role, for the authroisation object K_CSKS ( CO-CCA: Cost Center Master), you allow all cost centers. Thus, the user can get access to the master data of all cost centers in the given controlling area.
3. For the reports, the authorisation object is K_REPO_CCA ( CO-CCA: Reporting on Cost Centers/Cost Elements ), here you need to restrict the cost centers for which he is allowed to view the reports . The pain here is that you don't have the option of entering the Cost center groups, rather you can give the cost center values in the range.
4. In the authorisation object, K_CCA ( CO-CCA: Gen. Authorization Object for Cost Center Accounting), you try giving all cost centers in the controlling area , if it does not work then, don;t give any cost center so that it will take from the above authorisation objects in 2 & 3 above.
I suggest you discuss with Basis consultant, who will guide you through the above process.
Njoy
Siva

Infotype authorizations at Company Code level

The project I am working on has two company codes 1000 & 1100. The user requirement is that a person working in one company should be able to make changes only to employee data of employee's in his/her company and to have only read authorizations for employee data from the other company.
I've tried creating a role for Company 1000's employees where the authorization object P_ORGIN has Personnel Areas for that company code itself and all permissions (read, write etc.) and another role with read access to all Personnel Areas. However, when assigned to a user, they are still able to access data from the other company (i.e. the company whose personnel areas were not listed in the first role).
Any ideas what I am doing wrong and how I can resolve them?

Authorization level            *
Infotype                       *
Personnel Area                 1000's Personnel Areas
Employee Group                 *
Employee Subgroup              *
Subtype                        *
Organizational Key             *
Authorization level            R
Infotype                       *
Personnel Area                 1100's Personnel Areas
Employee Group                 *
Employee Subgroup              *
Subtype                        *
Organizational Key             *
This config should work.
Or can you post the values you entered in all the HR authorization objects in your role so that we can check. (P_ORGIN, PLOGI, P_PERNR etc)

: Role Security within Company Code at Profit Center Level

Can someone explain how to restrict GL transaction processing within a company code, below the company code level, at a Divsion / Branch level at the profit center level for ECC6 via user authorizations in FI GL roel security?

Hi,
Create Authorization Objects for the branch/ division containing the User ids and mention in the role.
Thanks
VK

Authorization at Company Code Level for table FEBKO

Hello Experts,
I need to add authorization check on my report program that accesses and displays data from table FEBKO. However the user should only be able to access the data of table FEBKO particular only for their company code. How can I apply this? Thanks in advance for all your responses!
Best Regards,
Kurtt

Hi,
if it is in your own report, you can define your own authorization object with field for company code. Check transaction SU21 or ask your security guy. Then you will check if an user have authorization for this object.
Cheers

No authorization for company code in MRBR

Transaction MRBR is currently wide open. Anyone with authorization to this transaction can unblock invoices in any company code.
Standard security profiles can only restrict users at universal (*) or purchasing group level. We require control on company code.
OSS 399953 suggests creating validation rule (GGB0) to test user authorizations for transaction MRBR and authorization object F_BKPF_BUK.
Can anyone supply the validation coding to solve this security problem?
Is anyone familiar with this problem ? Do you have a solution ? also None standard SAP solutions are welcome
Thanks in advance
Greetings,
Vincent

Hi Vincent
Another option could be to implement an authorization check in the BAdI MRM_RELEASE_CHECK - this is, of course not Standard.
The code could look somthing like this:
DATA: wa_rbkp_blocked TYPE mrm_tab_rbkp_blocked.
LOOP AT i_rbkp_blocked INTO wa_rbkp_blocked.
    AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'F_BKPF_BUK'
             ID 'BUKRS' FIELD wa_rbkp_blocked-bukrs
             ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '02'.
    IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
      APPEND wa_rbkp_blocked TO e_rbkp_blocked.
      CLEAR wa_rbkp_blocked.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
Regards
Morten Nielsen

Tax code does not exist in company code Error in FBCJ

Dear Sir,
I want to post a document using business transaction Expenses in Cash Book.
In this case entry will be posted to the GL account which are tax relevant.
Necessary configuration for Business Transactions in FBCJ2 have been done.
even The Tax code is assigned to Company code in MM (SM30 > J_1ICONDTAX)
It is observed that the transection calculates Tax and geting saved (The indecator becomes Yellow)
But at the time of posting entry to FBCJ Cash Book System throws error
"Tax code ZM does not exist in company code 1000"
I am using the same tax code namely "ZM" in other transactions such as F-02
where it is working fine and does not throw any error.
Please take me to step by step configuration if the same needs to be configured @ FV12
Regards & Thanks in anticipation
Chirag Shah

Dear Sir,
I have checked @ FV12 and found that the condition record is already exist with the Key combination of the referred tax code namely ZM.
But i could not find how to check the WEF date.
Even I tried Creating new condition record through FV11 but even there i could not find how do I create a condition WEF 1.4.2011 (The first date of Fiscal Year)
Kindly Guide
Regards & Thanks in anticipation
Chirag Shah

Adding Multiple files to many Sharepoint Sites based on the Sites Code (Splitting the data using a code)

Hi,
I'm pretty new to Sharepoint and wanted to ask a question to see if it can actually do what we need it to do.
We would have a top Site within a collection and under this we would have 400 sites for different sections of the business (External) Lots of teams create documents for all these sites and use the Code of the site in each document so we know what business
site its going to. For example 67890_BusinessReportMay.docx We know this document should be heading to site 67890
We have lots of services sending data to these 400 business sites. If we were to do them manually it would take most of our time to go to each site and upload the documents, even if we could do all the sites documents in 1 multiple upload. We still have
to go to each site to do it
Is there an easy answer to this? At present I have folders to match each of the 400 Sharepoint Sites and I use an Integration Services package to move all the documents into these 400 Matching folders. I do this using the Code at the start of each file name.
If it doesn't have a code its put into an error folder and reported back on.
Then I want something to automatically go through each of these folders and load them into the Sharepoint Sites document libraries.
OR
Say you have 600 files all going to the 500 sites on Sharepoint in one folder. The File contains meta data regarding the Sites Code. Using this you can split the files and automatically pull them across to the Sharepoint Sites without having to go
into each Sharepoint Site?
I'm thinking that you cant do this and I'm hoping I'm wrong. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Debbie

Hi Debbie,
According to your description, my understanding is that you want to move the documents to different sites based on the code in the name of the files.
I recommend to create workflow and set the workflow to start when an item is created to achieve this goal.
As there is no built-in action which can move the documents cross site, we need to use the custom activity 'Copy List Item Extended' which need to be downloaded from
http://spdactivities.codeplex.com/.
Please per the steps in the link below to deploy the custom activity to SharePoint:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/82609160-152f-461a-9a19-0e996f5a309b/sharepoint-2010-archiving-the-files-from-one-document-library-to-another-document-library-in
After that, we can create a workflow to meet the need.
Here is the detailed steps to create the workflow:
Create a column in single line of text type(called NO for example) in the library where the documents are uploaded, and input value manually in the column to store the code when uploading the documents. (We can also use workflow to extract the code from
the name of the documents if the codes are always 5 numbers.)
Create a workflow associated with the library and set the workflow to start when an item is created.
Select If current item field equals value, change the settings to be If Current Item: NO equals 67890.
Select Copy List Item Extended, change the settings to be Copy item in Current Item to list at site 67890 URL.
Select Delete Item, change the settings to be Delete Item in Current Item.
Create other conditions from step 3 to step 5 to copy the documents to different sites and delete current documents.
Best regards.
Thanks
Victoria Xia
TechNet Community Support

Issue with document created with a tax code related to a different Company Code

Hello,
we need to clear a document created with the tax code "YY" which is associated to the Company Code Espana even if the vendor of this document belongs to the Country Portugal.
When we try to clear this documents we get the follow error:
Tax code YY for Country Portugal has been deleted or incorrectly changed
The problem is the tax code exists but it is associated to Company Code Espana and not to the Portugal one
In order to cleare this document should we activate the tax code for Portugal, as well?
Thank You

Hello, Are you trying to post entry having Plant in Portugal? Thanks, Deepanshu

Role Authorization using DSO

Hello Gurus,
I have a requirement, where some Roles have to be assigned to some roles only for some period.
what i did is
- built a DSO with direct update from a table.
- the super user can maintain this table for the 2 fields
Role             Status
ROLE_ABC             1 (active)
ROLE_DEF              0 (inactive)
now, if a Role is set as active in the above Table & DSO, then assign that Role to the list of users.
& if this Role is set as inactive, remove this Role from all assigned users.
I had similiar stuff with analysis authorisation using the 0TCA_DS01 dso , it worked for me.However, now the requirement wants me to do similar stuff with Roles.
has someone done a similiar thing earlier ?
any help, appreciable.
Thanks
John

no answers, closing the thread

Validation when posting a document using T. Code FB50 or F-02

Dear Experts
Please let me know on how to validate when posting a Cross Company Transaction using T. Codes FB50 or F-02. The requirement is to restrict Branches (each Branch is a Company Code in SAP) to post any Cross Company documents by selecting HO Company Code in Line Item, system has to stop the User by giving Error Message.
We can't control this using User level Authorizations because, here the Authorization is provided to the Users to post the Transactions using T. Codes FB50 and F-02.
To restrict this, I created a Validation as below:
Prerequisite:
BKPF-TCODE = 'FB50' OR BKPF-TCODE = 'F-02' AND
BKPF-BUKRS = 'Br. Company Code' AND
BSEG-BUKRS = 'HO Company Code'
Check:
FALSE
Message:
You Can't post Cross Company Transactions using T.Code FB50 or F-02
And I activated the above Validation in OB28 for HO and Branch Company Codes. But the Validation is not working properly. Can anybody help me on how to proceed further in this regard please.

Hi,
I haven't tried to use a transaction code for Validation purpose. Instead, I have used document type as prerequisite and then check:
BKPF-BUKRS = 'Br. Company Code' AND
BSEG-BUKRS = 'HO Company Code'
If the condition is met, it displays an error (per the message in validation) while completing the line item details on posting a document.
Please let me know if that helps. If not, I can try to replicate your scenario and let you know if there is anything missing.
Thanks,
Ashish

How to link ECC Company code with BCS Consolidation unit

I have to create new consolidation unit in BCS, parallelly in SAP R/3 also I have created a company code.
I could read following in the forum :-
The Company Codes from ECC are assigned to the characteristic Company in BCS, thus creating a one to one relationship between ECC & BCS company codes.
BUT HOW TO DO THE SAME.
Also any advise on Profit centre and cost centre etc in BCS in line with ECC. This is first time I am configuring in BCS,

Typically in ECC company codes are assigned to a company. The company is typically used for cons unit in BCS, but it is not uncommon for company code to be used as cons unit.
When company code is used, it is an attribute of the characteristic company and thus in the load mapping, the company is mapped to the attribute company code. This results in company code being mapped to company.
Otherwise, if company code is in the databasis as the cons unit role, then it is simply mapped to company code to company code.
For profit center and cost center, these are typically assigned the role subassignment, but it is not uncommon for profit center to be a cons unit for a matrix consolidation. However, these characteristics must first be included in the totals/databasis infocube.

Cross-company code postings - FI validation

Hi,
We start using the cross-company code postings (transaction OBYA) between company code A and company code B and have to give authorizations both company codes to the Finance users. The idea is to have a set of G/L accounts which are allowed to be used when company code A and B are posted via cross-company code posting.
SAP recommends to implement a validation in FI to restrict the Intercompany scenatios. I attempted to create a FI validation for complete document (call-point 3) with no success:
1)
IC Rule: BSEG-BUKRS = A and BSEG-BUKRS = B and BSEG-HKONT IN ACCOUNTSET
Prerequisite: TRUE
Check: IC rule
Message: E- Account & not allowed for cross-company postings
When I test it, the Intercompany clearing account configured in OBYA, and which is in ACCOUNTSET, shows up in the error message, which unwanted.
2)
IC Rule 1: BKPF-BUKRS = '0017' AND BKPF-BUKRS = '0005'
IC Rule 2: BSEG-HKONT IN ACCOUNTSET
Prerequisite: TRUE
Check: IC Rule 1 --> IC Rule 2
Message: E- Account & not allowed for cross-company postings
No error message is issued at all, even if the G/L account is not in ACCOUNTSET.
Please advise what I am missing.

Hi Nitin,
Thank you for your feeback.
I just wanted to clarify that the cross-company code posting is when company code A can intitiate a posting to company code B simultaneously (for example Intercompany re-charge, cash concentration, etc.). The trigger for cross-company code posting is the company code field on the line item. If company code A is in the header (BKPF-BUKRS) and at least one document line item filled up as company code B, the system created two documents for each company code, offsetting the Intercompany clearing account, configured in OBYA.
For example:
Posting via FB50: Leading company code = company code A (BKPF-BUKRS)
Item 1: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 1; Amount 200; Company code A (as a default)
Item 2: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 2; Amount 100; Company code B (manually changed)
Item 2: Credit; G/L account 2;                        Amount 300; Company code A (as a default)
The systen creates two postings:
Posting 1: company code A
Item 1: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 1; Amount 200;
Item 2: Credit; G/L account 2;                        Amount 300;
Item 2: Debit ; I/C Clearing Account;              Amount 100;
Posting 2: company code B
Item 1: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 2; Amount 100;
Item 2: Credit;I/C Clearing Account;              Amount 100;
The only connection between the two is the cross-company code number (BKPF-BVORG), which assigned by the system once posted, as a logical connection.
I guess we could use a dedicated document type. If that's the case, how would the validation work then?
Coudl you please share more details on the BTE option?
Thank you,
Inna

T-code CJ88 role authorization using company code?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for