Table component disturbing the order of rows while displaying

HI,
In jspx when ever data is displayed in table,when we select last page the table component
is displaying data which is not sorted.(values given to table are changed in output).
This is occuring only in last page.
EX:If i have 87 records with pagination,where 15 are displayed.
when i select to last page the output from my query is not matching the data viewed.
Using apache trinidad1.0.5
Regards,
Vin
Edited by: vinTK on Apr 26, 2012 6:16 AM

I think that it's a very common situation.
No ideas?
I think that it's interesting to create appz with great performance.

Similar Messages

Alternate fact table without disturbing the existing fact table in EIS

I have a question in EIS, how to load or work with alternate fact table, without disturbing the existing fact table, pls provide me with some procedure and steps
thank u in advance
sunil

Yes you can have multiple models and metaoutlines load one cube. I've done it before. The trick is you ahve one "master" metaoutline that you put all the measures in (even if they are manually added. You use that to build the cube. Then you can have multiple metaoutlines build different measures within the cube. The idea is you have to have them update different intersections or the last one in will be what you get. I have a client that gets sales info from one source, shipment info from a different relational source . in all I have 10 differnt models and metaoutlines that build one cube. you just lump the load statements into one CBS file. It works great (or as great as EIS works). The biggest issue is timing to make sure all the sources are available when the load is going to be doe. Of course you could build different parts at different times.

Availability check of component in the order

Hi,
how to check the availability of all the BOM components of a finish product in the order.
Thanks for your help

Hi,
There are two ways to process a bill of materials in Sales. Once you have entered a bill of material in a sales order, the system runs pricing, inventory control, and delivery processing at:
1 Main item level if the material is assembled, or
component level if the material is not assembled
The type of processing is determined by the item category group(MMR-Sales: sales org. 2 screen).
In the first case mentioned above use the ERLA Item Category group then the system will carry out pricing, inventory control, and delivery processing at main item level, In this case the components will function as text items and are not relevant for delivery.
Whereas in the second case Use the LUMF as item category group then system will carry out pricing, inventory control, and delivery processing at the component level, . In this case, only the components are relevant for delivery. During processing the system automatically creates a delivery group.
Also check the below link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/70/a7853478616434e10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
Hope this will help you.
Thanks and Regards,
Atul
Edited by: Atul Dagade on Mar 27, 2009 12:17 AM

Is it possible to change the number of rows while printing a contact sheet in Iphoto? Please help

Hi guys, I am struggling to find out how to change the number of rows on a contact sheet on Iphoto , i have selected my photos and i want it to print 6 photos on each page however I am not able to do it. Please help me out, im a Art student and i need to submit my contact sheets for an assignment Thanks in advance guys !!!!!

I don't think you can do that with the Contact Sheet layout. If you have Pages or a 3rd party image editor that supports layers you can do what you want. Or try the demo version of OmniGraffle for Mac It will run fully operational for 14 days.

Influence the order of positiontypes while Billing

Hello experts,
I'm pretty new to the SAP world and the first assignment I got from my colleagues is quite complex. Maybe you can help me with it.
Sales order with items and discount line:
10 item (item category with milestone billingplan)
20 item (item category with milestone billingplan)
30 discount line (item category without billing plan)
At the moment I try to bill this salesorder, the order of lines change:
30 discount line
31 item line
32 item line
Apparently this has something to do with the fact that SAP first bills the lines with no billing plan and then the lines with billing plans. So suggestion to the business was to use an itemcategory with a billingplan of 100%, this would solve the issue, however they dont want this.
An alternative solution I'm thinking of is to influence the logic of SAP to leave the positions as they are. Could this be realised via copy controls maybe?
Thnx for any tips you could give me.
Rgds,
John Waltmans

Yep, I already checked this and this doesnt solve the problem.
The number will now be:
30 discount line
40 item line
50 item line
However the issue, namely the wrong order still exists.

How On mouse click on the table [0][m] the pop up window will display

hi ,
I need your help I am working on a application in which in a table when i click on the first column cell i.e. column must be first and the row may be any then the pop up window will display in swing .For exp if I click on the second row and the first column then information about that perticular row will display in the pop up window . That popup window have the all the information about that perticular row and some extra field informatimn also . should I create the another model for that or I can use existing datamodel of the existing table.We are not using any database at this time . how I can do that please help me . It is urgent.
Thanks in advance
anum

Add a MouseListener to the table. Use the rowAtPoint(...) and columnAtPoint(...) to determine which cell was clicked. This display a JDialog with the required information.

Firefox changes the "order" of my multiple display from 4-3-1-2 to 2-1-3-4

When my PC starts, the "order" of my monitors in Control Panel | Display | Screen Resolution is: 4-3-1-2
After I start Firefox, it changes the "order" to 2-1-3-4
I have to go into the Control panel and Change the appearance of your displays back to 4-3-1-2
I'm using Windows 8.1 with Firefox as my default browser. Everything is up-to-date.
I've had this problem for a long, long time, I've just never gotten around to seeking help for it. Always having to go into the Control Panel to "rearrange" by monitors is a nuisance.
Any assistance to resolve this problem would be greatly appreciated!

I've never heard of something like this. But I suppose it's possible that it has something to do with hardware acceleration. Try disabling graphics hardware acceleration. Since this feature was added to Firefox, it has gradually improved, but there still are a few glitches.
You might need to restart Firefox in order for this to take effect, so save all work first (e.g., mail you are composing, online documents you're editing, etc.).
Then perform these steps:
#Open Firefox ''Options'' window (''Preferences'' on Mac or Linux) as follows:
#* In Firefox 29.0 and above, click the menu button [[Image:New Fx Menu]] and select ''Options'' for Windows or ''Preferences'' on Mac or Linux.
#* In Firefox 28.0 and previous versions, click the orange Firefox button at the top left, then select the "Options" button, or, if there is no Firefox button at the top, go to Tools > Options.
#In the Firefox Options (or Preferences) window, click the ''Advanced'' tab, then select ''General''.
#In the settings list, you should find the ''Use hardware acceleration when available'' checkbox. Uncheck this checkbox.
#Now, restart Firefox and see if the problems persist.
Additionally, please check for updates for your graphics driver by following the steps mentioned in the following Knowledge base articles:
* [[Troubleshoot extensions, themes and hardware acceleration issues to solve common Firefox problems]]
* [[Upgrade your graphics drivers to use hardware acceleration and WebGL]]
Did this fix your problems? Please report back to us!
Thank you.

How do I control the order in which JTree displays nodes?

I'm trying to display the nodes in a JTree in a specific fashion, but I can't figure out how to change the order JTree displays them in. It seems the default is alphabetically, with leaves first and nodes with children second. I've spent a few hours pouring through the documentation, but I haven't been able to find out what I need to do. Anyone know?

They are displayed in the order they are added on the same level.

How to preset the order of rows in the outer query of a correlated query ?

Good morning,
I have the following simple query:
select empno,
       ename,
       sal,
       sum(case
             when rn = 1 then sal
             else -sal
           end) over (order by sal, empno) as running_diff
   from (
         select empno,
                ename,
                sal,
                row_number() over (order by sal, empno) as rn
           from emp
          where deptno = 10
         );That calculates a running difference and uses "row_number() over (...)" which is an Oracle specific feature to do so. It yields the following result (which we will consider correct):
     EMPNO ENAME             SAL RUNNING_DIFF
      7934 MILLER           1300         1300
      7782 CLARK            2450        -1150
      7839 KING             5000        -6150I wanted to come up with a solution that was not Oracle specific different solution. I tried the following code:
(EDIT: after additional thought, that code is totally different in meaning and will never come close, to the above result. Consider it wrong and ignore this attempt altogether.)
select a.empno,
       a.ename,
       a.sal,
       (select case
                 when a.empno = min(b.empno) then sum(b.sal)
                 else sum(-b.sal)
               end
          from emp b
         where b.empno <= a.empno
           and b.deptno = a.deptno) as running_diff
from emp a
where a.deptno = 10;but the result is
     EMPNO ENAME             SAL RUNNING_DIFF
      7782 CLARK            2450         2450
      7839 KING             5000        -7450
      7934 MILLER           1300        -8750which is a long way from the original result. I've tried everything I could think of to order the rows before the running difference is calculated but, have been unsuccessful.
Is there a way to change this second query --(without using Oracle specific features)-- without using windowing features that would yield the same result as the first query ?
Rephrase of the above question:
Is there a way, using plain vanilla SQL (that is aggregate functions and set operations such as joins and unions) to create a query that yields the same result as the first one ?
Also, this is not for production code. This is simply an exercise in set manipulation that I'd like to see a solution for.
Thank you for your help,
John.
Edited by: 440bx - 11gR2 on Jul 18, 2010 12:50 AM - correct "ho w" to "How"
Edited by: 440bx - 11gR2 on Jul 18, 2010 1:42 AM - struck out all references to row_number and windowing features being Oracle specific features.
Edited by: 440bx - 11gR2 on Jul 18, 2010 3:51 AM - Noted that my try is woefully wrong and restated the objective to make it clearer.

Hi, John,
One way to get a running total (which is basically what you want) is to do a self-join. Join each row (let's call it the current row, or c) to itself and everything that came before it (let's call this the previous row, or p), and do a regular aggregate SUM, like this:
WITH     got_base_sal     AS
     SELECT       deptno
     ,       2 * MIN (sal)     AS base_sal
     FROM       scott.emp
     GROUP BY deptno
SELECT       c.deptno
,       c.empno
,       c.ename
,       c.sal
,       b.base_sal - SUM (p.sal)     AS running_diff
FROM       scott.emp     c
JOIN       scott.emp     p     ON     c.deptno     = p.deptno
                    AND     (     c.sal     > p.sal
                         OR     (     c.sal     = p.sal
                              AND     c.empno     >= p.empno
JOIN       got_base_sal     b     ON     c.deptno     = b.deptno
WHERE       c.deptno     IN (10)
GROUP BY c.deptno
,       c.empno
,       c.ename
,       c.sal
,       b.base_sal
ORDER BY c.deptno
,       running_diff     DESC
;Output:
    DEPTNO      EMPNO ENAME             SAL RUNNING_DIFF
        10       7934 MILLER           1300         1300
        10       7782 CLARK            2450        -1150
        10       7839 KING             5000        -6150I said you basically want a runninng total. There are two differences between a running total and your requirements
(1) You want to have a total of the negative of what's in the table. That's trivial: use a minus sign.
(2) You want the first item to count as positive instead of negative. That's not so trivial. The query above counts all sals as negative, but adds an offset so that it appears as if the first item had been counted as positive, not negative.
You didn't say what you want to do in case of a tie (two or more rows having the same sal). The query above uses empno as a tie-breaker, so that all sals are calculated as if they were distinct. This is similar to what analytic functions do when the windowing is based on rows. If you want something similar to windowing by range, that might actually be simpler.
The query above calculates a separate running_diff for each deptno, similar to "PARTITION BY deptno" in analytic functions. You happen to be interested in only one deptno right now, but you can change the main query's WHERE clause, or omit it, and the query will still work. If you don't want this feature (analagoud to not having any PARTITION BY), it's easy to modify the query.
You could also get these results using a recursive WITH clause. That meets the criteria of avoiding analytic functions and Oracle-specific features, but not the one about using only plain, simple SQL features.

How to restrict the the oreder reason list while creating sales order

Hi gurus,
Can anyone suggest me
how to restrict the Order rerson list
while creating the sales order in VA01
Thanks & Regards
kalyan.

hi,
Try this exit:
Enhancement MMFAB001 User exit for generation of release order
Thanks,
AMS

Which table contains the order status in APO

Hi experts,
i need to knw which table contains order status in APO system.
like in the table /SAPAPO/POSMAPN we have open and close status ,
Like wise we need to find a table which has the order status in APO.
particularly i am interested in all those whose status is in PGI (post goods)
regards
rahul.

Hi,
You can check the details in PLAF-table.
Regards,
Shamma

Will the order of elements stored in pl.sql table retains

Hello Friends,
I am having a record type and the for each element of record , i am having corresponding pl.sql table type .
If i am storing the values into the records from a query and also the individual elements in the pl.sql table type will the order of data is stored as it is . ..
example...
in a record type the data is stored as ( name1 , age1 , salary1) , (name2, age2, salary2)
if i store in corresponding pl sql table type name1 , name2
age1, age2
salary1, salary2
can i relate the index of record type with that of pl/sql table type ..
pls advice
thanks/kumar

Kumar,
Yes, the order of elements will be the same.
Any specific reason why you would want to create a collection for each individual attribute of the record ?
You can as well declare another variable of the same record and initialize it.
A few other suggestions for your code :
1) The 2nd FOR loop can be modified to accommodate the query of the first cursor there-by eliminating one extra iteration.
SELECT MINC.FAMID,
                     MINC.MEMBNO,
                     MEMB.AGE,
                     SALARYX,
                     SALARYBX,
                     NONFARMX,
                     NONFRMBX,
                     FARMINCX,
                     FRMINCBX,
                     CU_CODE
                FROM MINC, MEMB, FMLY
               WHERE MINC.FAMID = MEMB.FAMID
                 AND MINC.MEMBNO = MEMB.MEMBNO
                 AND MINC.FAMID = FMLY.FAMID
                 AND MEMB.FAMID = FMLY.FAMID
               ORDER BY MINC.FAMID2) The collections can be alternately initialized as follows :
   v_member_rec(v_member_rec.last).FAMID := j.FAMID;
   max_earnings_tab(max_earnings_tab.last) := v_max_earnings;The tried the below example for confirmation ...
declare
type emp_rec is record
(name emp.ename%TYPE,
dept emp.edept%TYPE,
sal emp.esal%TYPE
TYPE emp_rec_tab is table of emp_rec;
ert emp_rec_tab := emp_rec_tab();
TYPE ename_tab is table of varchar2(20);
ent ename_tab := ename_tab();
TYPE edept_tab is table of number;
edt edept_tab := edept_tab();
begin
for i in (select * from emp)
loop
     ert.extend;
     ent.extend;
     edt.extend;
     ert(ert.last).name := i.ename;
     ert(ert.last).dept := i.edept;
     ert(ert.last).sal := i.esal;
     ent(ent.last) := i.ename;
     edt(edt.last) := i.edept;
end loop;
for i in 1..ert.count
loop
     dbms_output.put_line(ert(i).name||','||ent(i));
     dbms_output.put_line(ert(i).dept||','||edt(i));
     dbms_output.put_line('');
end loop;
end;

Add a new component in Production order while not being in BOM

Hi all,
I would like to know how to forbid the addition of a new component in a Production order that doesn't exist in the BOM.
Currently when we create a Production Order, the components of its materials are read from the BOM. If we add a component that doesn't exist in the bom the system allows it without any problem. We want to forbid this and let components be added to a PO only when they take part in the BOM.
Any idea?
Thanks in advance.

SS,
You can use an userexit to check before saving the order, based on the BOM(Order master data tab) used in the order, it should validate the component material number. If it finds a new material in the order, it should terminate the save with a message to user.
The following enhancement is available for production orders:
PPCO0008 Enhancement for adding and changing components
This enhancement is used to check components (for instance against a standard parts database), which have added to or changed in an order. This check can then refuse to copy a component into the order or can replace one material number with another.
The enhancement PPCO0008 contains the following enhancement components:
Function exit
EXIT_SAPLCOMK_006
Enhancement for adding and changing components
Activities
1. Create the enhancement
To do so, create a new project or use an existing project.
2. Activate the project.
The enhancement can only take effect after you have activated the project.
Regards,
Prasobh

Worklist table ponits to the first row after copy row

Hi experts,
We have installed ESS BP 1.41 into EP version 7.02. Now we found one issue in the ESS Working Time application screen.
The screen has an option of copying rows from Worklist Table on top to the bottom table having Weekly/Daily view.
The problem is if we choose recoreds from the top table and press the button 'Copy Rows' the table gets re-sorted and again points to the first row.
When there are hundreds of entries in that table, it becomes difficult for the user to see the rows selected for copy immediately after pressing the Copy Rows button.
Can anyone help to stop this sorting.
Regards
Arindam

Hi Siddharth,
many thanks for your reply. One doubt in BP 1.41, it is a WD java application, but the note you suggested, talks about the Ehp5 version which is in WD abap. Can you please re check and confirm.
Regards
Arindam

Scrap Quantity component in the production order

Dear gurus,
in the material master of a component i insert the scrap % ( view mrp4) = 10 %.
The field is read by planning Mrp and explosion of bom , but when i inseert this component in the production order manually the system don't read this % and the field "scrap quantity in the component detail of the production order is blank.
Are there a setting for uograde this field ( in the production order ) when i insert MANUALLY the component in the production order?
Example:
1) material master of the component > scrap % (view MRP4 ) = 10 %
2) production order created
3) insert this component quantity 100 pc and the system after read the material master insert 110 pc , and upgrade the field automatically 10 % (as material master)?
Thansk a lot
Daniele Pistilli
PP TEAM

Hi Danielepistilli,
Well there is a lot of difference is there: see you are creating production order for header material which is FG. If you maintained component scrap in material level it will be dependent on BOM quantity which you maintained for the header material.
For example say component x quantity is 50 in BOM. How it will calculate when you run the MRP.
component scrap % is 5% then:
===> (5/100) * 50 + 50
Formula is: Percentage of scrap quantity x original quantity + original quantity
So ===> 52.5 quantity should be come for component
So, the order quantity for the header material will not take this quantity or scrap but if you see individually in MD04 screen for X material you can find this quantity ok.
I hope it clears your doubt and helps you any queries please revert me back.
Regards,
Madhu.G

Table component disturbing the order of rows while displaying

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for