Table data getting locked for multiple user for a Z-table updation after EH4 to EHP6 Upgrade

Hi,
We have one new upgraded system at EHP6, earlier system was at EH4 where multiple user can Run one Z T-code and can edit the entries for the Z-table.
This Z-Tcode is calling SM30 internally for updating the Z-Table.
Now in the upgraded system, when one user is into the transation code, and other user runs that T-code, systems throws a POP-UP mesg saying that the data is locked and can be displayed only(can not be edited).
I have debugged the code in both the environment and found that there is one statement Call C_ENQUEUE ID < > field. for which the Sy_Subrc is coming as 2 in the upgraded system which is causing the issue, where as the sy-subrc is 0 in the system at EH4 level.
Can any body tell me why this Z-tcode is not allowing to be accessed by multiple user at same time for Editing(updating the table) .
Regards,
Archana Jha

Hi,
When you create the lock object you can define the keys.
and then you can use those in the ENQUEUE function.
Regards.
regards.

Similar Messages

Can we set "IN PROCESSu201D status for multiple users for a single workitem?

Hi,
As per my client current scenario every work item will be sent to 3 useru2019s (One is the supervisor of the other two users). If any one of the user executes the work item it will automatically call a Ztransaction and displays the screen. When the user without taking any action, he presses the BACK button (in Ztransaction) and comes out of the transaction. Then the workitems for the rest of the users will disappear from there inboxes.
But my client requirement is such that, whenever the user click on back button the workitem should be "IN PROCESS" status for two users(One is the supervisor and one who executes the workitem) out of 3 users possessing the workitems.
Please provide me any advice to the above requirement.
Thanks in advance,
Ranganadh

I think this can be done either by putting a check whether the user does anything. If he does a flag should be set which can be used in the Codition Tab of the Activity step that will prevent the workitem from completion.
Thanks
Arghadip

How to lock multiple user for a transcation code at same time is der any tc

how to lock multiple user for a transcation code at same time is der any tc
suppose i hav 15 user and i want to lock 10 user for mm02 who can i to it

Basis can do a export and import transport, still if don't have connection between boxes.
or
check this
http://www.sap-basis-abap.com/abap/copy-program-variants-from-one-to-another.htm
a®

WebTools Creating multiple users for the same User

I had to make a few changes to a BP in SAP which will synch back into WebTools but now I am getting multiple users for the same contact. For example my user is cspehar_1 now in Webtools there are cspehar_1, cspehar_2, cspehar_3 and so on up to _8.
This is occuring for several users in webtools.
What causes this and how do I fix it?
Thanks,
Craig Spehar

Hi Craig,
There are two ways to cause this that I am aware of:
1. Change the "Business Partner Synch Contacts Field" setting after the initial synch.
2. Change the Web UserID on the BP contact in B1 (OCPR.U_PRX_SID).
After that, update the user in WT and synch. (might also happen if you update the BP in B1)
Since the synch is using the OCPR.U_PRX_SID to identify the contact, it will not be able to find it in B1 if the U_PRX_SID has changed. When it does not find it, it assumes it needs to be created. This results in a duplicate.
The solution is to reset the U_PRX_SID back to what it was or set the synch contact field back to what it was.
Then delete the last created duplicate contact from B1.
There may be further data corruption issues here. If orders/quotes/opportunities or other dependant data has synchronized referencing the duplicate user, these data will need to be correct as well.
FYI, whatever caused this was probably at the root of your order problem as well.

Call for adobe form is going for dump for multiple users

hi,
i am calling an adobe form in a program i.e. for multiple users. now my problem is.....
3 people are using same tcode to generate the adobe form output for different data. but when they click at a time on the button to generate the adobe output, then adobe form is coming for only one user and it is going for dump for other users.
and this dump is coming because of exception "CX_FP_API_INTERNAL" in funtion module FP_FUNCTION_MODULE_NAME which i am using to get the function module name of the adobe form in my program.
can u please give me some solution to rectify this issue....

That's nothing!
An engineer and I contacted Adobe technical support by phone to ensure the PC I was having custom built was configured to its optimum. They advised XP64 as the best operating environment. After that discussion we had to completely revise procurement, etc to get the bits and compatible XP64 compatible software, putting the build project back a few weeks as well, Imagine how I laughed when I found out on one of these forums that XP64 is the worst choice and totally unsupported by CS4!
I have written to Shantanu Narayen, Adobe CEO and didn't even get an acknowledgement I raised this last week on the Adobe stand at BVE and was told they'd get someone to contact me asap but guess what, niet...! To be fair there has been one Adobe executive that recognises the problem and the damage poor customer support is causing the company; he has been as helpful as he can. Unfortunately, it seems the overall Adobe culture at the top is "get the money and run". If your problem goes beyond what's already on their web pages, tough luck!
Regards,
Graham

Can we creat an Apple ID for multiple users?

I work for a company where we are rolling out iPads in big amounts. The problem is that they all need an Apple ID in the training they get about the iPad they receive because they have to install MobiControl on it.
It's no problem to let them create an Apple ID at home, but they have to fill in credit card numbers once they connect at work when they try to install apps. That's the problem... Not everyone want's or has credit cards...
Maybe it's possible to create an Apple ID for multiple users???
Thanks!

iPad in Business and Education
You may find a better answer in this part of the forum, since it's meant for situations like you're in.
http://www.apple.com/support/appleid/
is also info about apple ID's.
You can make apple ID's without a credit card, you just have to jump through a couple of hoops to do it since the default is that people will always give a credit card. The key to making an ID without a credit card is that you try to download a free app first, then follow the 'make an ID' prompt. That will get you the 'none' option for payment.

For multiple users on a computer, will Firefox Sync synchronize all the users on a computer or only the one logged on?

For multiple users on a computer, will Firefox Sync synchronize all the users on a computer or only the one logged on? For instance my spouse and I will share a laptop and I want to sync my Firefox when I log on there also but do not want to sync her data.

Curt
how do you know if your using the
Central cache all distributed cache ?
and are they both stored in the same place ?

Triggering a sub work flow for multiple users at same time.

I have a scenario in which I have created sub workflow as an activity for approval process. This sub work flow should be triggered for multiple users at the same time and their decison is independent of each other.
This is like creating multipe instance of the same sub work flow and then the sub work flow runs indepedently as a new work flow for each of the approver and the process is completeded for approver independently.
How can this be achieved?

Tyr to do like this,
1. First include the subworkflow in the main workflow template.
2. Now include standard Block Step in the main workflow template.
3. In the block select the block type as ParForEach.
4. Before doing the 3rd point make sure that all the agents for whom you want whom you want to initiate the workflow, populate them in a Multiline conatiner element.
5. Once completing 3rd and 4th points open the block step under the tab ParallelProcessing assign the multiline container element name in the for e;g if the multi line container element name is COSTCENTER then do the binding like below. the conatiner element COSTCENTERLINE is created by default once you include the multi line conatiner element under parller processing tab.
&COSTCENTER[&_WF_PARFOREACH_INDEX&]& --------> &_COSTCENTER_LINE&
Now assign the agent of the subworkflow as COSTCENTERLINE , imean if suppose you have 3 entries in the internal table then three separate and for three different agents the workflow is instantiated.

App updates for multiple users on same Mac with maverick

Background. I have a single iMac that I have been using since ~2007. It's a family computer and there are three(3) accounts/users on it. I am the administrator for them. The operating system has been kept up with each OS upgrade since its purchase. We are currently using Maverick.
Problem - In the past with all the other operating systems (pre-Maverick), when a application needed to be upgraded I could log into my account (administrator rights) and perform the necessary upgrade and it would propgate to ALL the users on this computer. However, since upgrading to Maverick I can no longer just upgrade on the administrators account (i.e. mine) and it propogate to the other users. I now have to log into each individual account (i.e my wifes and sons) and perform the upgrades to their account.
Question - Does anyone know if there is a way to allow the administrator to perform the single upgrade that propogates to others users in OS Maverick without having to log into each individual accounts and updating each account separately. Also does anyone know why OS Maverick no longer supports the capability like ALL previous OS's have in the past?
Thanks

Ok thanks. The apps that I'm referring to are: Pages, keynote, numbers, iMovie, and iPhoto. Each of these were originally purchased or came (iLife / iWork) with the machine when I purchased it. All of those apps are located for each user under HD/Applications folder. Each user does have a apple iD for itunes and itunes purchases for songs etc. but all applications are purchased by me the administrator and placed in the HD/Applications folder. So I'm not sure why I now (since upgrading) to Maverick need to go into each account and perform the updates to these apps. All previous OS updates never had this problem.
Does this now mean for each user that I perform the update my HD is getting multiple downloads and installs and increasing the amount of usage per application. For example if "pages" takes 1 Gb and I install it for each user will it now take a total of 3Gb for the 3 users?
Thanks for your help

Add-MailboxPermission for multiple users on multiple mailboxes

I have a need to grant a large number of users full access to an equally large number of mailboxes. I've previously been able to do this easily in the management shell where I have multiple users for one mailbox (or vice-versa; one user for multiple mailboxes)
by using one of the following 2 commands:
get-content c:\xxxx.txt | foreach { Add-MailboxPermission $_ -User user.name -AccessRights FullAccess}
or
get-content c:\xxxx.txt | foreach { Add-MailboxPermission examplemailbox -User $_ -AccessRights FullAccess}
This works fine for when there are only multiple entries on one side of the equation, but using this method, I would need to run the command multiple times to get all of the accesses set up as requested. So I've been looking to see if there is a way of writing
one command that could achieve it all in one go.
What I've been looking at doing is creating a .csv file, filled as such;
name,mail
user.name1,mailbox1
user.name2,mailbox2
And then writing a shell command like the below:
import-csv c:\xxxx.csv | foreach { Add-MailboxPermission $_.mail -User $_.name -AccessRights FullAccess}
Will this achieve the result that I'm aiming for? or is it going to be easier to just go with the more time-consuming method of just having the multiple entries on one side of the equation?

Hi,
I have a test in my environment, you can use the following cmdlet to grant multiple users full access to multiple mailboxes.
Import-csv c:\test1.csv | foreach { Add-MailboxPermission $_.mail -User $_.name -AccessRights FullAccess}
For example, if I want to grant amy02, amy03 full access permission to amy01; grant amy01, amy02 full access permission to amy03, the test1.csv file should be:
Hope this can be helpful to you.
Best regards,
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

Send Mail to External Mail ID's for Multiple Users

Hi All,
I want to send mail from SAP to External mail ID's for multiple Users.The program is ok.
But I want to send this to Multiple external Mail id's. Where should I assign this receivers list. Pls advise.
What is the transaction to assign multiple receivers.?
CALL FUNCTION 'SO_NEW_DOCUMENT_ATT_SEND_API1'
      EXPORTING
        DOCUMENT_DATA              = GD_DOC_DATA
        PUT_IN_OUTBOX              = 'X'
        COMMIT_WORK                = ''
      TABLES
        PACKING_LIST               = IT_PACKING_LIST
        CONTENTS_TXT               = IT_MESSAGE
        RECEIVERS                  = IT_RECEIVERS
      EXCEPTIONS
        TOO_MANY_RECEIVERS         = 1
        DOCUMENT_NOT_SENT          = 2
        DOCUMENT_TYPE_NOT_EXIST    = 3
        OPERATION_NO_AUTHORIZATION = 4
        PARAMETER_ERROR            = 5
        X_ERROR                    = 6
        ENQUEUE_ERROR              = 7
        OTHERS                     = 8.
Thank You.
Pranitha.

IT_RECEIVERS parameters needs to be passed as shown below.
    wa_receivers-receiver = "..........External mail id".
    wa_receivers-rec_type = 'U'.
    wa_receivers-express = 'X'.
    APPEND wa_receivers TO lt_receivers.
    CLEAR wa_receivers.
Once mail is triggered to the external mail id's, check the mail is transferred from SAP or not using the tcode SCOT.
In SCOT,follow the path UTILITIES-> Overview of send orders.
Regards,
Satish Kanteti

GRC 10: Initial password for multiple users creation in a ARQ request???

Hi All,
I was trying to create a request in ARQ for multiple users. I noticed that, I could add all the necessary required information for multiple users using the template. I added the roles as well. However, I could not set the initial password for multiple users as the tab "User System Details" (where the initial password is provided for a single user) is disabled!!!
The users were successfully created in the R/3 system. However, due to non-availability of initial password, these users could not log into the R/3 system.
May I know how to set the initial password for multiple users?
Regards,
faisal

Vit,
I was trying to test this multiple user creation scenario. But I am surprise to get a template where in I have only below mentioned fields:
1. User Name
2. User Id
3. Email
I filled these details and uploaded. Then filled the "User Access" details. While submitting the request, I got the error:
"Last name is not mentioned for user id XXX"
But there is not such column in provided template by GRC!
I added 2 columns: First Name and Last Name and saved it and uploaded again. These details are not picked up!
Following are the only columns shown:
1. User Name
2. User Id
3. Email
4. Manager
Out of above, only "Manager" field is editable and others are disabled.
Last time I remember, I has got complete template with all the columns. Unfortunately, I have deleted it and not available with me now.
Any idea you have why am I getting such incomplete template?
Regards,
faisal

SESSION VARIABLES : HOW TO TEST FOR MULTIPLE USERS

I have a username session variable set up on a localhost testing envirnoment.
This works fine for one user, but when I open another occurence of the browser (or just another tab) to test for multiple users the system overwrites the session variable with the last username input.
So the question is:
Why doesn't dreamweaver hold an instance of the session variable for each browser session? and if not what are your suggestions?
Thanks
Adam.

Thanks for that.
After scouring the internet I found the only way of running 2 instances of firefox without them sharing the session variables is to create 2 new firefox profiles in windows + set the MOZ_NO_REMOTE environment variable.
Internet explorer is much easier as it has a 'new session' option in the file menu, but seems to have more trouble displaying tables correctly.
Hope this helps anyone with a similar problem.

One skype number for multiple users in Skype Manag...

Is it possible to get one Skype-in phone number and assign it to multiple members in Skype Manager?
If so, how do I go about it?
I also asked this here: http://community.skype.com/t5/Skype-Number/One-skype-number-for-multiple-users-in-Skype-Manager/m-p/...

You could always allocate a number to multiple business accounts in Skype Manager. Then re-direct the number via IP-PBX to go to different extensions.
Try the following here [If you look in the advanced section of this manual, you'll see an example of two accounts using one number]
http://download.skype.com/share/business/guides/skype-connect-user-guide.pdf
7.5 Online Numbers for incoming calls
You can use both business Skype accounts and Online Numbers simultaneously on a
single SIP Profile if you wish. In other words, you may have multiple business accounts
and Online Numbers added to one SIP Profile at the same time.
7.5.1 Adding an Online Number to your SIP Profile
Shows you how to setup such
Thanks,
Kent C.

How to run the the impersonation permission grant command for multiple users

I have run below command earlier to grant the impersonation for a user called user1
get-mailbox -identity user1 | add-adpermission -user domainname\service application user -ExtendedRights ms-Exch-EPI-May-Impersonate
Now I want to run this command for multiple users like user2, user3, user 4 together. How should I run the command.
This is for Exchange Server 2007 SP2
Abhijeet M. Mohite

Hi Abhijeet
get-mailbox -identity user1 | add-adpermission -user domainname\service application user -ExtendedRights ms-Exch-EPI-May-Impersonate
I am little bit confused with this command so can you please help me what to right inplace of User1 and domainname\service application user
Example: I wanted to give Impersonate rights to
[email protected] then can you please complete command for me. Thanks in advance.
Warm Regards, Pramod Kumar Singh Manager-IT

Table data getting locked for multiple user for a Z-table updation after EH4 to EHP6 Upgrade

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for