Table default sorted - 11g

I'v put a sort criteria on my View object - and when the ADF page is showing up - all rows are sorted fine. But when I add a new row, it's put on the the top. I've made all my columns sortable - but isn't is possible to have the table sorted by default?
Rgds, Henrik

Hi,
the way to look at this is that you query rows from a VO. These rows are held in an iterator. If you create a new row then this row is added to the iterator and not the VO yet. So as it was mentioned before, you will need to re-execute the query (which for performance reason does not need to go back to the database)
Frank

Similar Messages

Change Default Sort Logic Of ADF Table?

Hello All,
In my application is an ADF table with lots of rows. The default sort logic for one of the columns is from 'Oldest to Newest'. The user has to click on the sort again to get 'Newest to Olderst'. This takes away a lot of time.
How can I change the default sort logic to 'Newest to Oldest' ?
Thanks,

Is this jdeveloper 11.1.1.2?
What is the problem with the normal scenario - just add 'order by' the view object clause?
The table offers ascending and descending ordering.

Want to change the default sort order of a Advanced table

Hi all ,
Hope all of you doing good.
I am trying to change the deafult sort order of a " View Applicants" advanced table on Irecruitment selfservice page , using personalization feature but its not sorting as expected.
The default sort order is asc by the name of the applicants. I wanted to override it by " Date Applied " desc using personalizing the advanced table.
But its not sorting by Date applied and still shows the sort by applicant name.
Any inputs will be greatly helpful
I am using the Oracle Apps 11.5.10 version.

Hey guys m I got the answer for the below question.
Oracle have few Restriction and limitation on such Advanced table in sorting the data,
Few of them are as mentioned below ...
1. Sorting is not allowed for tables that allow inserts.
2. Sorting is not supported for tables containing updateable columns
3. Sorting is disabled when the Select column is checked for a row in a table or when Hide/Show is present in a table.
Because of the above limitations , we cannot sort or override the existing alphabetical name sort order to Date applied sort order on the View Applicant advanced table.
You can observe that , View Applicant page is having an option called "Update Status" which allow us to update applicant’s status or rating in the Advanced table.
On such updatable advanced tables, oracle does not allow us to override the sort order on any of the table columns.
Keeping it in a nutshell , I can say it's does not allow us to change the sort order of the view applicant advanced table ( which is having updateable columns ) to sort them in Date applied instead of Name( which is default ).

How to restore default sort order on a table?

Have an ADF table with some sortable columns, populated by an SQL view (having its own Order By).
Looking for a way to let user revert to default sort order after sorting columns.
Currently, I have a button linked to:
public String cmdRefreshOrders() {
this.getTblOrders().setSortCriteria(null);
DCIteratorBinding iter = ADFUtils.findIterator("iterUnderlyingTable");
iter.executeQuery();
return null;
This doesn't work
Any ideas?

Tried. Doesn't work.
Iterator doesn't have a setOrderByClause() -- closest I see is applySortCriteria(), which takes an array of SortCriterias, not a String. Might be able to parse Order By string to create array of SortCriterias, but this smells wrong. Probably wouldn't work anyway because ...
Tried doing iter.applySortCriteria(null) before executeQuery. This accomplished nothing -- the sort created from clicking the column header persisted.
Looks to me like the sort is persisting as some property in the table or in the display column.
Any more ideas?
Thanks
Ed

How to set default sorting order in ADF Table

Hi,
I want to set the default sorting order as ascending in adf table. Please help me regarding how can we do it.
Using JDev 11.1.1.5.0

Hi Frank,
Thanks for the quick reply.
I have done binding of table with list of pojos.
The Class for which Data control is created is as:-
public class DemoDC {
    private List<TableEntity> tableList =
        new ArrayList<TableEntity>();
    public List<TableEntity> getTableList() {
        return tableList;
    public void setTableList(List<TableEntity> tableList) {
        this.tableList = tableList;
where TableEntity is a pojo which has all the columns as its attributes.
Now when i do the above steps , after clicking on pencil icon and seecting the iterator name in the iterator tab (DemoDC-> tableList) , and selcting the 'sort criteria' tab when i select a column and try to set the sort order I get error as ' Iterator can not be created for the selected node ' .

Set Default Sort in File Manager

Hi,
When i go to File Manager, Media Card, Photos, the default "sort" is set to Name and "order" Ascending. If i want to change it to "sort" date and "order" descending, i select date and then it jumps back to the actual pictures. I have to go back into the menu to do the second selection "sort" descending". So can the development team create an option where you change all the settings first and then you save them which then brings you back to the actual pictures? And also look into the option of remembering your preferred sort/order preferences? because once you go out of file manager and go back in, you have to do these steps again.
if I am overlooking this feature (maybe it's already a setting somewhere which i missed) feel free te let me know.
Thanks

Hi,
It's not about set of key field in MDM Import Manager but the reason is that you can not select more than 1 category(Lookup Taxonomy) in maintable for one record. thats why error is coming because for this Property Multi-valued always No.
Even, you can try this in Data Manager manually create three Category A, B and C in taxonomy mode on selecting Sub table Categories, then on selecting main table, when you select category field(which is lookup to categories table)for a particular record you could able to select only one category A, B or C.
i would suggest make a Attribute of type text having three values A, B and C and mark this as Multi-Valued in Attribute Detail and link this Attribute with your category. in this way you can attach three values A, B and C with your Record.
Other thing you can do,make this category field as (Lookup Hierarchy not lookup taxonomy) in main table to Subtable(Hierarchy) then for this field in main table you can set Property Multi-valued = Yes in MDM console and then after Import using MDM Import Manager finally only one record will get created in Data Manager as:
Name Category
1 A;B;C
Hope it will Help you,
Rewards if Useful.....
Mandeep Saini
Edited by: Mandeep Saini on Jun 20, 2008 8:46 AM

Default sorting order used by oracle

Can anyone please let me know whether oracle uses any default sort order or not when executing an sql which does not have any sort order/ order by clause?
I have a sql query where no sort order is specified.
Now if I add some more columns in the select clause and execute the same query, the number of records returned are same and also the records are same.
But the order in which they are displayed is different from the previous query.
Could anyone please let me know whether oracle uses any default sort order or not when executing an sql which does not have any sort order/ order by clause
or does it depend on the columns of the table?
Thanks in advance.

To answer your direct question "why the order in the previous example differ".
When you added additional columns to the select list, that changed the query plan generated for the query. This caused Oracle to pick up the rows in a different order. There are a number of reasons this could happen, the new selected columns caused a different index (or no index) to be used for one of the tables in the query, it caused a different table to be be used as the "driving" table (i.e. the first one accessed), it caused a different join method to be used.
HTH
John

Changing default sort direction

Hi there
The standard table analysis item that can be included in a template comes with functionality whereby a user can sort the data. The default sort direction is ASCENDING.
It is now my task to determine how to make that DESCENDING ... any ideas on how the default / initial sort direction can be altered?
Cheers,
Andrew

Hi Andrew,
maybe make the sort direction of the query DESCENDING.
regards,
Raymond Baggen
Uphantis bv

Default Sort in Presentation in Oracle BPM 10

I have a sortable (sort enabled) table in a presentation
And I want my table to be loaded with a default sort.
How can I do that?

Hi user9293762,
To pass the BPM object to the JSP page, please follow the below steps:
1) Place an interactive activity after the method execution.
2) Right click on the Interactive activity and select Main Task
3) In the Main Task wizard select Implementation Type as BPM Object Interactive Call
4) Select the BPM Object Variable, here you can pass your BPM object to the jsp page but make sure that the object you want to pass is an instance variable of type your BPM object
5) Click on the Use JSP Presentation and choose for your jsp page you want to attach with the interactive activity.
6) Finally click on OK
Now you can access the BPM object in your jsp page.
Bibhu

Unable to capture the adf table column sort icons using open script tool

Hi All,
I am new to OATS and I am trying to create script for testing ADF application using open script tool. I face issues in recording two events.
1. I am unable to record the event of clicking adf table column sort icons that exist on the column header. I tried to use the capture tool, but that couldn't help me.
2. The second issue is I am unable to capture the panel header text. The component can be identified but I was not able to identify the supporting attribute for the header text.

Hi keerthi,
1. I have pasted the code for the first issue
web
                         .button(
                                   122,
                                   "/web:window[@index='0' or @title='Manage Network Targets - Oracle Communications Order and Service Management - Order and Service Management']/web:document[@index='0' or @name='1824fhkchs_6']/web:form[@id='pt1:_UISform1' or @name='pt1:_UISform1' or @index='0']/web:button[@id='pt1:MA:0:n1:1:pt1:qryId1::search' or @value='Search' or @index='3']")
                         .click();
                    adf
                    .table(
                              "/web:window[@index='0' or @title='Manage Network Targets - Oracle Communications Order and Service Management - Order and Service Management']/web:document[@index='0' or @name='1c9nk1ryzv_6']/web:ADFTable[@absoluteLocator='pt1:MA:n1:pt1:pnlcltn:resId1']")
                    .columnSort("Ascending", "Name" );
     }

How to change the default sorting in iTunes

Hi,
Does anyone know how to change the default sorting method for all items in iTunes? I use the third option for organizing the library as a whole (the one that has a list of icons for bands that you double click to show only that band's songs). The only sorting method I use is to sort by Album by Year (ascending), this makes the most sense to me. I can tell that iTunes is attempting to remember when I do this for certain artists, but it epically fails at maintaining this sorting pattern.
To be clear, say I open Radiohead and click through to have it sort with the above method. Everything works great, but when I return a few days later to play Radiohead again, the sorting is not maintained. It could be as simple as sorting in a descending direction, or could even be trying to sort by the number it was added in my library.
I'd really appreciate it if someone knew of a way (maybe even through scripts if possible / the only solution) to eliminate this problem and have every (NOT just the artists who I've told iTunes to sort a specific way) artist sort that way.
I don't know if my copy is just corrupt? It may be, since for some artists it's started playing them in the above mentioned order they were added to my library even if I force a sort by album by year (i.e. it will go from playing a 2007 album to a 2002 album and not the 2008 album).
Thanks!

Andrew, I know I am extremely late to the party but I too use Grid View. I had the same problem that you had but have found this to work for me. I used it and it is still holding as my default sorting even after switching between the Artist page and Grid View.
Once you are inside of the Artist page continue to click on the Album column until it shows Album by Artist/Year.
That will give you each album sorted by the year instead of it randomly sorting it for you each time you leave an Artist's page and then back again.
Hope this helps.

Default Sorting in Customer open item clearing ( F-32, F-28)

Is it possible to make a user specific default sorting key in F-32 or F-28 other than the sort key in customer master?

Hi,
Create your own sorting format and tell the user assin it in editing options of tcode f-32 and f-28 or Directly FB00.
Regards,
Azeem

User tables default forms

Hello,
I want to use the user tables default forms (after adding the user table in Uer Tables menu, it's generated a form to view that table: add, delete, update info).
I'd like to lauch this form from my add-on menu. I know how to do that, but I wonder if that MenuID of the menu depends on the SBO installation (on what other tables were added before in SBO). Also, I'd like to put Choose from list capabilities in that form. I know also how to do this (just like a system form), but I also don't now if the FormID is the same on each installation.
Thank you for your answer.
I hope I made myself clear.
Irina Stanca

You may try this to find the MenuUID of your UDT:
Start Saved Query through menuitem
Have you checked Application.ResourceData? I'm not sure whether UDT forms are considered system forms, though. Anyway, you should be able to get the FormID of your UDT form on the fly by iterating the Application.Forms collection and checking the Title property, which equals the UDT Description.
HTH
Juha

Windows native file dialog default sort is by date instead of name

I somehow managed to get the Windows common file dialog default sort to be by date instead of name, so I have to resort by name every time I select a VI to load. I haven't been able to identify the registry entry that tell how the MRU list is sorted. How do I make the default sort by name instead of date, short of removing and reinstalling LabVIEW?

I think its a Windows issue and nothing to do with LabVIEW since LabVIEW just calls the MS common dialog. Do you see the same behaviour when using Windows Explorer? I know that with Win2K, I can set the default folder view to always sort by date. To go back to the default, select My Computer>Tools>Folder Options>View>Reset All Folders. I don't have easy access to any computers with a different OS right now so I can't describe what the process is for them.

Default Sort Order for Library View

It would be fantastic if there were a user defined preference for a default sort order in Library view. For example, some users may prefer to always view the images by File Name, or Rating, etc, without having to change the sort order for each individual folder they view via Lightroom.
Thanks!

Thanks for your suggestion Allan, but it doesn't work.
I'm specifically referring to the defaults that Aperture 3 adopts when you use the "File, Import, Folders as Projects with the projects and albums setting.
What I'm finding is regardless of the setting in the Library preferences, the default sort order for the project is Date and Manual for the album.
Yet if I create a project manually the default sort order is as per the Library prefs. Strange.

Table default sorted - 11g

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for