Table source row filter no effect on prompt

Hi all,
I have a filter in the where clause in a table source in the BMM. This works correct and filters the tables on company name and facts.
However in the dashboard prompt on the same page i can still see companies that im not supposed to see. I have a similar repository with the similar data where it does work, so im kinda lost why it isn't working. The filters in the table source and the configuration of the prompt rapport are exactly the same.
Anyone have an idea how to filter the prompt as well?

Found it - closed

Similar Messages

Filter on the same logical table source on two logical tables is not working properly

Hi,
In the RPD, assume that I have a physical table named Employee_fact, created an Alias called D0 Employee Fact
In the BMM I've two logical tables called Employee_fact_Type1 and Employee_fact_Type2
Each of these logical tables has the same Logical table source - D0 Employee
But in each logical table source, I've a filter in where clause
such as, for Employee_fact_Type1 employee_type = 'XXX'
for Employee_fact_Type2 employee_type='YYY'
These two facts are present in the same BMM and each of them are connected to two dimensions
such as
Dept_type1 <- Employee_fact_type_1 -> Tenure_type1
Dept_type2 <- Employee_fact_type_2 -> Tenure_type2
In analysis, When I query the columns from Dept_type1 and Tenure_type1, the database query generated shows the condition employee_type='YYY' instead of employee_type='XXX' .
But, adding the columns from Dept_Type1, Employee_fact_type_1, Tenure_type1 it shows proper filter.
I checked the relationships, presentation layer for the sources of presentation tables and everything looks good.
Can anybody tell me what goes wrong here?

did you set the content level as well?

Tabular: Row filter on USERNAME() still returns all rows if current user is NOT matched in table??

I have a table (basically the same setup in the various dynamic security in tabular blogs) where the table contains WindowsUserName stored as domain\username.
I have a Row Filter on the table: SecurityTable has a filter of =SecurityTable[WindowsUserName]=USERNAME()
When a user connects to the tabular model AND their name is matched in one of the rows they return JUST the rows with their match. Which makes sense.
However, if a user connects and their Windows user name is NOT in a row in that table....they return ALL rows???
That makes no sense to me.
It behaves almost as if it is doing a check and if it DOESN'T find a match it just returns all values.
What am I missing?
--------------EDIT-----------
Found the issue: that use was (unknown to me) a domain admin, so... admin rights trump all :)

Resolved:
User had admin rights, didn't realize this at the time.

2 table sources in LTS but only 1 in query?

Hi,
I am using obiee 10g.
I have one DIM_A table with some data. DIM_A table is 'SELECT' type on physical layer and data in this table are filtered. I am using ValueOf(NQ_SESSION.USER) variable to filter data in this DIM_A table. Every user can see different data in this table.
In FACT_A table are data for every user so I need to always filter data in FACT_A using values in DIM_A table.
I have properly join in physical layer.
In BMM I have both tables. Every with only one logical table source. I added DIM_A as second "mandatory" source to existing FACT_A table source. So I can see 2 records at general tab of FACT_A table source and also inner join between them.
But when I make query only on FACT_A without dimension, or with some other dimension, DIM_A is not present in generated select so user can see data which are not for him.
I need to make MANDATORY join between FACT_A and DIM_A everytime.
Can you tell me how to simulate mandatory join between these two tables?

I am able to make "mandatory" join between DIM_A and FACT_A table using mentoned filter in security.
So I don't need to add username to BMM tables and I don't want to complicate it...
Thank you.
I would like to ask you on my second question...
"I thought that multiple sources in LTS should have same effect. I saw it somewhere... Now I need to make join as part of mentioned security filter, but I think that inner join in LTS shoul also work..."
Here is explained what I want:
Multiple Sources in BMM Layer
When you add multiple physical tables to one logical source then all these tables will be called when the OBIEE server creates the SQL to send to the database. For instance let's say you have one logical table called "Dim - Account" with one logical source "Dim_W_ORG_D" and this logical source is made up of the physical tables W_ORG_D and W_ORG_DX. When you create a report using this dimension the SQL will always join the two tables together and select from them both. If you have two seperate logical tables for W_ORG_D and W_ORG_DX then these tables will only be included in the SQL when you select a columns from each of those two tables.
I have multiple physical sources for one logical source. Physical sources are joined together. I can see join also in logical table source. But If i make query from this logical table in generated select is only one physical table which is not joined to another one.

Row filter on Interactive Report via URL parameter

Hi,
I've searched the forum but can't find a concise answer.
Is it possible to pass a parameter (p_X) from one page to another via the url and then use p_X to act as a row filter in an Interactive report?
Thanks for the help
Joel

Joel -
Read the link that Andy posted. It is a pretty good source. This topic is not really that difficult to do. I have done it several times. Make sure that you understand the URL syntax for APEX. If you need a refresher on this take a look at http://www.oracleapplicationexpress.com/tutorials/55
Austin

Multiple columns from the same dimension table as row labels performing slowly

(Working with SSAS tabular)
I'm trying to figure out what the approach should be for the following scenario:
Lets say we have a Customer table. The table has columns such as account number, department number, name, salesperson, account manager, number of customers, delivery route, etc
A user of the model could want to see any permutation of that information as the row labels. How should that be handled?
What we've been doing so far is that the user adds each column they want into the "ROWS" section in Excel. This works fine with smaller tables (for example, "Department" table with a "Department Code" and "Department Name",
but on large tables this quickly chokes. I understand why this is happening, I just haven't found a better way to accomplish the same thing.
I can add a calculated column to the model through VS, but obviously this is unsupportable and unscalable when each person needs their own permutations of the data. Can something similar be done in Excel?
This question seems to be what I need:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/97d1157a-1402-4227-b96a-79524401ddcd/mdx-query-performance-when-selecting-multiple-attributes-from-same-dimension?forum=sqlanalysisservices
However I can't find any information on how to add those properties (is it a multidimensional-only thing?)

Thanks for the help. Sorry but i'm a self-taught developer, and i may be missing some basics :)
Anyway i've done what you suggested but i get this error:
[nQSError: 15011]The dimension table source Dimension Services.DM_D_SERVIZI_SRV has an aggregate content specification that specifies the level Product. But the source mapping contains column COD_PRODUCT with a functional dependency association on a more detailed level .
where:
- DM_D_SERVIZI_SRV is the physical alias for the Service Dimension (and the name of the LTS too)
- COD_PRODUCT is the leaf of the hierarchy, the physical primary key, but it hasnt to be included in the hierarchy
Do i have to add another level with the primary key and hide it to the users?
I tried to solve this going to the logical tables source properties, on the tab contents, setting "logical level" to null for the hierarchy, but i don't know if this is correct.
Thanks

Neen help with date range searches for Table Sources

Hi all,
I need help, please. I am trying to satisfy a Level 1 client requirement for the ability to search for records in crawled table sources by a date and/or date range. I have performed the following steps, and did not get accurate results from Advanced searching for date. Please help me understand what I am doing wrong, and/or if there is a way to define a date search attribute without creating a LOV for a date column. (My tables have 500,00 rows.)
I am using SES 10.1.8.3 on Windows 32.
My Oracle 10g Spatial Table is called REPORTS and this table has the following columns:
TRACKNUM Varchar2
TITLE Varchar2
SUMMARY CLOB
SYMBOLCODE Varchar2
Timestamp Date
OBSDATE Date
GEOM SDO_GEOMETRY
I set up the REPORTS table source in SES, using TRACKNUM as the Primary Key (unique and not null), and SUMMARY as the CONTENT Column. In the Table Column Mappings I defined TITLE as String and TITLE.
Under Global Settings > Search Attributes I defined a new Search Attribute (type Date) called DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY).
Went back to REPORTS source previously defined and added a new Table Column Mapping - mapping OBSDATE to the newly defined DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY) search attribute.
I then modified the Schedule for the REPORTS source Crawler Policy to “Process All Documents”.
Schedule crawls and indexes entire REPORTS table.
In SES Advanced Search page, I enter my search keyword, select Specific Source Group as REPORTS, select All Match, and used the pick list to select the DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY) Attribute Name, operator of Greater than equal, and entered the Value 01-JAN-07. Then the second attribute name of DATE_OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY), less than equals, 10-JAN-07.
Search results gave me 38,000 documents, and the first 25 I looked at had dates NOT within the 01-JAN-07 / 10-JAN-07 range. (e.g. OBSDATE= 24-MAR-07, 22-SEP-), 02-FEB-08, etc.)
And, none of the results I opened had ANY dates within the SUMMARY CLOB…in case that’s what was being found in the search.
Can someone help me figure out how to allow my client to search for specific dated records in a db table using a single column for the date? This is a major requirement and they are anxiously awaiting my solution.
Thanks, in advance….

raford,
Thanks very much for your reply. However, from what I've read in the SES Admin Document is that (I think) the date format DD/MM/YYYY pertains only to searches on "file system" sources (e.g. Word, Excel, Powerpoint, PDF, etc.). We have 3 file system sources among our 25 total sources. The remaining 22 sources are all TABLE or DATABASE sources. The DBA here has done a great job getting the data standardized using the typical/default Oracle DATE type format in our TABLE sources (DD-MON-YY). Our tables have anywhere from 1500 rows to 2 million rows.
I tested your theory that the dates we are entering are being changed to Strings behind the scenes and on the Advanced Page, searched for results using OBSDATE equals 01/02/2007 in an attempt to find data that I know for certain to be in the mapped OBSDATE table column as 01-FEB-07. My result set contained data that had an OBSDATE of 03-MAR-07 and none containing 01-FEB-07.
Here is the big issue...in order for my client to fulfill his primary mission, one of the top 5 requirements is that he/she be able to find specific table rows that are contain a specific date or range of dates.
thanks very much!

Need help with date range searches for Table Sources in SES

Hi all,
I need help, please. I am trying to satisfy a Level 1 client requirement for the ability to search for records in crawled table sources by a date and/or date range. I have performed the following steps, and did not get accurate results from Advanced searching for date. Please help me understand what I am doing wrong, and/or if there is a way to define a date search attribute without creating a LOV for a date column. (My tables have 500,00 rows.)
I am using SES 10.1.8.3 on Windows 32.
My Oracle 10g Spatial Table is called REPORTS and this table has the following columns:
TRACKNUM Varchar2
TITLE Varchar2
SUMMARY CLOB
SYMBOLCODE Varchar2
Timestamp Date
OBSDATE Date
GEOM SDO_GEOMETRY
I set up the REPORTS table source in SES, using TRACKNUM as the Primary Key (unique and not null), and SUMMARY as the CONTENT Column. In the Table Column Mappings I defined TITLE as String and TITLE.
Under Global Settings > Search Attributes I defined a new Search Attribute (type Date) called DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY).
Went back to REPORTS source previously defined and added a new Table Column Mapping - mapping OBSDATE to the newly defined DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY) search attribute.
I then modified the Schedule for the REPORTS source Crawler Policy to “Process All Documents”.
Schedule crawls and indexes entire REPORTS table.
In SES Advanced Search page, I enter my search keyword, select Specific Source Group as REPORTS, select All Match, and used the pick list to select the DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY) Attribute Name, operator of Greater than equal, and entered the Value 01-JAN-07. Then the second attribute name of DATE_OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY), less than equals, 10-JAN-07.
Search results gave me 38,000 documents, and the first 25 I looked at had dates NOT within the 01-JAN-07 / 10-JAN-07 range. (e.g. OBSDATE= 10-MAR-07, 22-SEP-07, 02-FEB-08, etc.)
And, none of the results I opened had ANY dates within the SUMMARY CLOB…in case that’s what was being found in the search.
Can someone help me figure out how to allow my client to search for specific dated records in a db table using a single column for the date? This is a major requirement and they are anxiously awaiting my solution.
Thanks very much, in advance….

raford,
Thanks very much for your reply. However, from what I've read in the SES Admin Document is that (I think) the date format DD/MM/YYYY pertains only to searches on "file system" sources (e.g. Word, Excel, Powerpoint, PDF, etc.). We have 3 file system sources among our 25 total sources. The remaining 22 sources are all TABLE or DATABASE sources. The DBA here has done a great job getting the data standardized using the typical/default Oracle DATE type format in our TABLE sources (DD-MON-YY). Our tables have anywhere from 1500 rows to 2 million rows.
I tested your theory that the dates we are entering are being changed to Strings behind the scenes and on the Advanced Page, searched for results using OBSDATE equals 01/02/2007 in an attempt to find data that I know for certain to be in the mapped OBSDATE table column as 01-FEB-07. My result set contained data that had an OBSDATE of 03-MAR-07 and none containing 01-FEB-07.
Here is the big issue...in order for my client to fulfill his primary mission, one of the top 5 requirements is that he/she be able to find specific table rows that are contain a specific date or range of dates.
thanks very much!

Max number of logical table sources

Hi,
I have one logical table based (a fact table) on 8 logical table sources. This is done to simulate some partitioning as my customer does not have an partition set up on data base level.
Anyway my challenge is that a request fired in answers does not seem to take all logical table sources into account when building the physical SQL.
The missing logical table source (the one not being part of the physical SQL) does not differ from the other logical table sources.
Is there a limit of how many logical table sources BIEE can handle under one logical table?
BIEE version: 10.1.3.4

Alastair,
thanks for replying.
The logical tables sources partition the data by year. The aggregation level is the same for all LTS, the check for using this with other sources at this level is set and I've tried to force a result from every LTS (not combined but each LTS for itself). Forcing the results is done by using a dashboard prompt in answers filtering on year.
The whole 'LTS-setup' works in combination with Oracle Warehouse Builder. What I mean by this is the following: In OWB I split the data from one table into 8 different tables, each containing 3 years of data (except for the oldest data where the number of years and amount of data will grow over time).
This is done by comparing values of a year column with the actual year. E.g. the most actual table would contain data for the years 2010 - 2008, the next would contain data for 2007 - 2005, and so on.
Now as the years in the different tables will change, I decided to establish an equaly changing counterpart in BIEE. Basically I defined some repository variables: actaul_year, three_years_ago, six_years_ago, 9_years_ago, etc.
The fragmentation content of the different LTS is defined like this:
most actual data: MyModel.Year.Year >= VALUEOF("3_years_ago")d
next table: VALUEOF("3_years_ago") > MyModel.Year.Year AND MyModel.Year.Year >= VALUEOF("6_years_ago")
next table: VALUEOF("6_years_ago") > MyModel.Year.Year AND MyModel.Year.Year >= VALUEOF("9_years_ago")
etc.
The funny thing is that the missing table is the one containing years 13 - 15. All the other tables (e.g. 16 - 18 years and 19 - 21 years) are represented in the physical SQL. This particular table is not even represented in the physical SQL.
I haven't yet tried to take one of the 'working' tables out to see if this helps (getting an idea if there is a limit on number of LTS per logical table).
Any idea?
Thanks
regards
Andy

Union of more than 2 fragments/Logical Table Sources in BMM Layer

Hi,
I have come across many blogs which explain how to union two fragments/physical tables in a logical table source.
Currently, i have a requirement where i have to combine/union 4 fragments/physical tables in a logical table source, say T1, T2, T3, T4 dimension tables.
All have the same table structure, but differ in data.
The requirement is to define dashboard prompt on the union of these tables and populate the values from all the tables.
I am able to union two of the tables using a '>' and a '<' condition on a key column.
But, am not able to union the other two tables.
If i try to put more than 2 LTS, then the union fails.
Please share your thoughts.
thanks,
Varun

Hi Varun,
What do you mean by the Union fails?
You can have a logical table source in your business layer with 4 different tables as a source.
Import the tables in the physical layer and create your joins.
Then create a logical table in the Business layer and go in the table properties you will see that you can add as much tables as you want into the source (Map to these tables).there you can add all of your 4 tables and specify what type of join you want to have between them (inner, outer...)
Regards
Adil

Question related to Logical table source

Hi All,
I have very basic questions -
(1) When do we create multiple logical table sources within a dimension?
(2) If a dimension has more than one logical table sources , when do we need to map the underlying table to other underlying table of logical table sources.
For exp consider these tables XLE_Entity_Profile, XLE_REgistration , AP_Invoice_ALL
AP_Invoice_All is a fact table. relationship between XLE_Entity_Profile & XLE_REgistration is (1:M).
Join info is as below -
(a) XLE_Entity_Profile.Legal_entity_id = AP_Invoice_ALL.Legal_entity_id
to get the registration of LE the where clause is as below-
(b) XLE_Entity_Profile..Legal_entity_id = XLE_REgistration.Source_id and XLE_REgistration.Source_table = 'XLE_Entity_Profile'
I have created the alias of XLE_REgistration as XLE_REgistration_LE.
With in a dimension , i have 2 logical table source - XLE_Entity_Profile & XLE_REgistration_LE.
logical table source 'XLE_REgistration_LE' has where clause 'XLE_REgistration.Source_table = 'XLE_Entity_Profile'
When i query , LE name , LE Registration Name, i get error like -
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 14070] Cannot find logical table source coverage for logical columns: [LE_NAME]. Please check more detailed level keys are mapped correctly. (HY000)
Le Name is from XLE_Entity_Profile and LE Registration Name is from XLE_REgistration_LE.
But when using the properties of logical table source ' XLE_REgistration_LE' , i map it to 'XLE_Entity_Profile' ,i get the correct result.
I am not able to understand why am i getting error in first way of modeling.
Thanks , Ashish

Hi Ashish,
first about logical table sources (lts): you can create different lts for aggregation and/or fragmentation. Aggregation means that data is aggregated on another level among different physical tables. Fragmentation means that the content is different over different tables (other rows).
In your case, I think the problem is that your dimension is not denormalized, which results in a snowflake.
What I understand is that you have the following (physical diagram):
Invoice (fact table) >----- Entity (Dim) >----- Registration (Dim)
You have the following joins:
invoice.entity_id = entity.entity_id
and entity.entity_id = registration.source_id and registration.source = 'something'
First idea:
I would create the following join (in physical diagram):
Invoice (fact table) >---- Registration (Dim)
Where:
invoice.entity_id = registration.source_id and registration.source = 'something'.
Then in your Entity dimension you should create a hierarchy:
Grand Total Level
Entity
Registration.
In your dimension you should create the first lts: Entity
Set the aggregation content of this lts to Entity.
This lts contains only one physical table.
Map only the entity columns to the Entity physical table.
Then create the second lts:
Entity and Registration.
Set the aggregation content of this lts to Registration.
This lts must contain two physical tables, Entity and Registration.
Map the entity columns to the Entity physical table and the registration columns to the registration physical table.
Let me know if it works or not.
Regards,
Stijn

Financial Analytics -- Multiple logical table sources

we have two logical sources for Fact table. The two sources are Aggreates - one is at Invoice level and other one is at Supplier level. Each column in the fact is the derived column and is getting mapped to both the tables. My problem is when i use supplier name and invoice amount and other fact columns data , one of the fact column comes as Zero even though the back end query that BI server is firing is returning expected result. But some how when it comes on the report the data becomes zero. This doesnot happen when we specifically add a filter on the table at lower level of Aggregation (Invoice). This tells Bi server to fetch the data from table lower level of Aggregation .
The RPD that we are using is OOTB.

Scenario # 1: In BMM the two tables form a logical table called CUSTOMER with 2 different logical table sources which are CUSTOMER & ADDRESS.
-->In this case; based on the columns select source is defined in the physical query
possible case would be CUSTOMER , ADDRESS, and CUSTOMER & ADDRESS
-->Used in DE-normalized scenarios
--> BI uses intelligence based on content tab settings
Scenario # 2: In BMM the two tables form a logical table called CUSTOMER with 1 logical table source called CUSTOMER only.
-->In this case; CUSTOMER properties->General tab used both CUSTOMER & ADDRESS, in your physical query both tables present irrespective of column selection
-->Used in normalized scenarios
-->Forcing BI to follow our way, since we wont set content tab settings
Hope this helps

Adf skin, table's row hover

Hi,
I'm having confussion with adf-skinning.
Can i put hover effect so everytime user hovering a row of a table it will change the row's background color?
What class should I use in my css?
I've tried with af|table::data-row:highlighted, af|table::data-row:hover..
If there is anyone knows the link where I can dowload an adf-skin template then it also be very helpful to me..
Best Regards.

Hi,
I found this in the forum. Does it work for you?
Re: Comment on Frank's blog adding hover effect to table
af|table::content TR:hover { background-color: InfoBackground ; }
af|table::content TR:hover TD { background-color: transparent ; }
regards
Peter

How to create table with rows and columns in the layout mode?

One of my friends advised me to develop my whole site on the
layout mode as its better than the standard as he says
but I couldnot make an ordinary table with rows and columns
in th layout mode
is there any one who can tell me how to?
thanx alot

Your friend is obviously not a reliable source of HTML
information.
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
- Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
- Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================
"Mr.Ghost" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:f060vi$npp$[email protected]..
> One of my friends advised me to develop my whole site on
the layout mode
> as its
> better than the standard as he says
> but I couldnot make an ordinary table with rows and
columns in th layout
> mode
> is there any one who can tell me how to?
> thanx alot
>

BIEE Answers: Problem with logical table source

Hi,
I am creating a detail report in answers. This report does not use any column from the fact table in the logical model, but uses other dimension tables.
In the logical model fact table, I use 3-4 times the same physical table as logical table source in order to filter results or not.
The problem is that my report filters results by using one of the logical table sources. Is there a way to specify in answers or administration which should be my "default" logical table source for the specific physical table joins?
Another workaround is to add as a filter on the report one of the columns from the fact table that do use the desired logical table source, but this is not always a workaround..
Can you please advise?
Thanks in advance,
Nadia

Remember to set the # Elements in your hierarchy to the appropriate ratio between levels, actual numbers not so important but the ratio needs to be correct for the BI Server to make the best guess if using more than one LTS.

Table source row filter no effect on prompt

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for