Take longer time to run sql worksheet

Hi,
I using sql developer for running a script in sql worksheet, it take an endless time to complete running the command, and the command is just a simple query (e.g. begin xxxx end;)
This problem doesn't happen before in my pc. I had try to reinstall the software but still the same. Any one can help me?
I using oracle sql developer v1.5.3
Window 2K SP 4, 512 RAM Intel Pentium 1.8 GHz
Java SE development: jdk 1.6.0_03
Thanks

Sure it's as simple as you think? How about a SELECT * FROM DUAL ?
What kind of database is this?
Can you see in the Enterprise Manager (or similar) if the database is very busy or something?
Can you verify with another tool if it's related to sqldev or not?
K.

Similar Messages

The 0co_om_opa_6 ip in the process chains takes long time to run

Hi experts,
The 0co_om_opa_6 ip in the process chains takes long time to run around 5 hours in production
I have checked the note 382329,
-> where the indexes 1 and 4 are active
-> index 4 was not "Index does not exist in database system ORACLE"- i have assgined to " Indexes on all database systems and ran the delta load in development system, but guess there are not much data in dev it took 2-1/2 hrs to run as it was taking earlier. so didnt find much differnce in performance.
As per the note Note 549552 - CO line item extractors: performance, i have checked in the table BWOM_SETTINGS these are the settings that are there in the ECC system.
-> OLTPSOURCE - is blank
   PARAM_NAME - OBJSELSIZE
   PARAM_VALUE- is blank
-> OLTPSOURCE - is blank
   PARAM_NAME - NOTSSELECT
   PARAM_VALUE- is blank
-> OLTPSOURCE- 0CO_OM_OPA_6
   PARAM_NAME - NOBLOCKING
   PARAM_VALUE- is blank.
Could you please check if any other settings needs to be done .
Also for the IP there is selction criteris for FISCALYEAR/PERIOD from 2004-2099, also an inti is done for the same period as a result it becoming difficult for me to load for a single year.
Please suggest.

The problem was the index 4 was not active in the database level..it was recommended by the SAP team to activate it in se14..however while doing so we face few issues se14 is a very sensitive transaction should be handled carefully ... it should be activate not created.
The OBJSELSIZE in the table BWOM_SETTINGS has to be Marked 'X' to improve the quality as well as the indexe 4 should be activate at the abap level i.e in the table COEP -> INDEXES-> INDEX 4 -> Select the u201Cindex on all database systemu201D in place of u201CNo database indexu201D, once it is activated in the table abap level you can activate the same indexes in the database level.
Be very carefull while you execute it in se14 best is to use db02 to do the same , basis tend to make less mistake there.
Thanks Hope this helps ..

Auto message restart job take long time to run

Dear all,
I have configre the auto message restart job in sdoe_bg_job_monitor
but it take long time to run.
i have execute the report i have find out that it is faching records from smmw_msg_hdr .
in the table present 67 laks records are there.
actually it is taking a lot of time while getting data from the table
is there any report or tcode for clearing data in the table.
I need ur valiuble help to resolve the issue.
Regards
lakshman balanagu

HI,
If you are using oracle database you may need to run table statistics report (RSOANARA) to update the index. The system admin should be able to this.
Regards,
Vikas
Edited by: Vikas Lamba on Aug 3, 2010 1:20 PM

NAC Agent takes long time to run

Cisco NAC agent takes long time to popup or run on Windows 7 machine.
The client machine is windows 7, running nac agent 4.9.0.42, against ISE 1.1.1
Any ideas how to reduce NAC Agent timing?

Hi Tariq,
I'm facing the same issue with ISE 1.1.1 (268) with Agent 4.9.0.47 for Windows XP clients. I have already configured "yes" to disabled the l3 swiss delay and reduced the httpa discovery timer from 30 to 05 sec but still clients get aprox 2.30 minutes to popup and finished the posture discovery.
Can you please advise if this is the minimum time or what is the minimum time and what are the parameters to set to a minimum time to complete agent popup and posture discovery..?
Is there any option that we can run this on backgroup..?
thanks in advance..

Oracle9i reports take longer time while running in web

Hi,
I have developed few reports in Oracle9i and I am trying to run the reports in web. Running a report through report builder takes lesser time compare to running the same report in web using web.show_document. This also depends on the file size. If my report file size(.jsp file) is less than 100KB then it takes 1 minute to show the parameter form and another 1 minute to show the report output. If my file size is around 190KB then the system takes atleast 15 minutes to show the parameter form. Another 10 to 15 minutes to show the report output. I don't understand why the system takes long time to show the parameter form.
I have a similar problem while opening the file in reports builder also. If my file size is more than 150KB then it takes more than 15 minutes to open the file.
Could anyone please help me on this.
Thanks, Radha

This problem exists only with .jsp reports. I saved the reports in .rdf format and they run faster on web now. Opening a .jsp report takes longer time(file with 600KB takes atleast 2 hours) but the same report in .rdf format takes few seconds to get opened in reports builder.

How to run ABAP Function Module in Background Wchich Takes Long Time to Run

How to run ABAP Function Module in Background FOR LONG TIME
I am not that experienced with ABAP. I am on SAP BI 7.0. I WANT TO RUN A FUNCTION MODULE
RSDRT_INFOCUBE_DATA_COPY.
I used SE37 and then executed the module, I supplied the parameters on the form which opped-up and then program started running. . Program was however interrupted after 10 minutes by ABAP. How can I run it in background without interruption?
THANKS A LOT.

Hi,
You can call this FM in a program and run that program in background.
Regards,
Raju

Script takes long time to run

Hi Friends,
We have a leave record in the following manner:
name date leaves
ABC 01-oct-08 1
ABC 02-oct-08 1
ABC 03-oct-08 1
ABC 04-oct-08 1
ABC 05-oct-08 1
ABC 10-oct-08 1
ABC 18-oct-08 1
ABC 19-oct-08 1
ABC 20-oct-08 1
ABC 25-oct-08 1
ABC 26-oct-08 1
ABC 27-oct-08 1
ABC 28-oct-08 1
and we need an output in the following manner:
output
Name FromDate ToDate Leaves
ABC 01-oct-08 05-oct-08 5
ABC 10-oct-08 10-oct-08 1
ABC 18-oct-08 20-oct-08 3
ABC 25-oct-08 28-oct-08 4
The code for the above mentioned logic is as follows:
=======================================================
=======================================================
procedure KPM_AB_LWP_PROC(p_err_buf OUT VARCHAR2, p_ret_code OUT NUMBER) is
diff number;
prev_date date;
p_prev_date date;
first_date date;
last_date date;
dt date;
total_leaves number := 0;
ecode varchar2(20);
ename varchar2(240);
cursor ab_lwp_cur(process_from_date date, process_to_date date, e_code varchar2) is
select
ab.EMPCODE,
ab.RECORD_DATE,
ab.FIRST_HALF,
ab.SECOND_HALF,
(em.last_name || ', ' || em.TITLE || ' '|| em.FIRST_NAME || em.MIDDLE_NAME) EMP_NAME
from
kpm_hr_absent_record ab, kpm_hr_emp_mst em
where
ab.EMPCODE = em.EMPCODE
and (ab.FIRST_HALF in ('AB','LWP') or ab.SECOND_HALF in ('AB','LWP'))
and ab.EMPCODE like e_code
and ab.record_date between process_from_date and process_to_date;
cursor active_emp is
select empcode
from kpm_hr_emp_mst
where status='Active'
order by empcode;
begin
for emp in active_emp loop
begin
select min(ab.RECORD_DATE), max(ab.RECORD_DATE)
into prev_date, last_date
from kpm_hr_absent_record ab
where (ab.FIRST_HALF in ('AB','LWP') or ab.SECOND_HALF in ('AB','LWP'))
and ab.EMPCODE like emp.empcode;
exception
when others then
prev_date := null;
last_date := null;
end;
dt := prev_date;
FND_FILE.PUT_LINE(FND_FILE.OUTPUT,'Employee' || chr(9) || chr(9) || 'Name' || chr(9) || chr(9) || 'From Date' || chr(9) || chr(9) || 'To Date' || chr(9) || chr(9) || 'Total Leaves');
FND_FILE.PUT_LINE(FND_FILE.OUTPUT,'---------' || chr(9) || chr(9) || '-----' || chr(9) || chr(9) || '----------' || chr(9) || chr(9) || '---------' || chr(9) || chr(9) || '-------------');
while dt <= last_date loop
first_date := dt;
total_leaves := 0;
for m in ab_lwp_cur(prev_date, last_date, emp.empcode) loop
ecode := m.empcode;
ename := m.emp_name;
diff := m.record_date - prev_date;
if diff = 0 then
if m.first_half in ('AB','LWP') then
total_leaves := total_leaves + 0.5;
end if;
if m.second_half in ('AB','LWP') then
total_leaves := total_leaves + 0.5;
end if;
prev_date := prev_date + 1;
else
prev_date := m.record_date;
goto print_leave;
end if;
p_prev_date := prev_date -1;
end loop;
<<print_leave>>
if total_leaves > 0 then
FND_FILE.PUT_LINE(FND_FILE.OUTPUT,ecode || chr(9) || chr(9) || ename || chr(9) || chr(9) || first_date || chr(9) || chr(9) || p_prev_date || chr(9) || chr(9) || total_leaves);
end if;
dt := prev_date;
end loop;
end loop;
exception
when others then
FND_FILE.PUT_LINE(FND_FILE.LOG,'Error: ' || sqlerrm);
end KPM_AB_LWP_PROC;
=======================================================
=======================================================
The problem is that this code takes about 24hrs to run which is not accepted.
Kindly suggest us some other technique to implement the same logic.
For your reference, the KPM_HR_ABSENT_RECORD table has about 3,75,000 records in it.
Also we have created some indexes on certain column as recommended by explain plans.
Thanks in advance
Ankur

with t as (select 'ABC' as nm, to_date('01-oct-08','dd-mon-yy') as dt, 1 as leaves from dual union all
               select 'ABC',to_date('02-oct-08','dd-mon-yy'), 1 from dual union all
               select 'ABC',to_date('03-oct-08','dd-mon-yy'), 1 from dual union all
               select 'ABC',to_date('04-oct-08','dd-mon-yy'), 1 from dual union all
               select 'ABC',to_date('05-oct-08','dd-mon-yy'), 1 from dual union all
               select 'ABC',to_date('10-oct-08','dd-mon-yy'), 1 from dual union all
              select 'ABC',to_date('18-oct-08','dd-mon-yy'), 1 from dual union all
               select 'ABC',to_date('19-oct-08','dd-mon-yy'), 1 from dual union all
               select 'ABC',to_date('20-oct-08','dd-mon-yy'), 1 from dual union all
              select 'ABC',to_date('25-oct-08','dd-mon-yy'), 1 from dual union all
              select 'ABC',to_date('26-oct-08','dd-mon-yy'), 1 from dual union all
              select 'ABC',to_date('27-oct-08','dd-mon-yy'), 1 from dual union all
              select 'ABC',to_date('28-oct-08','dd-mon-yy'), 1 from dual)
   -- end of sample data
select nm, min(dt), max(dt), sum(leaves)
from
   select nm, dt, max(group_id) over(partition by nm order by dt) group_id
            , leaves
   from
      select nm, dt, case when trunc(dt) - 1 != lag(trunc(dt),1,trunc(dt))
                                                                 over(partition by nm order by dt)
                           then rownum
                           end group_id
             , leaves
      from t
group by nm, group_id
order by 1,2;Hope this helps.
@Blushadow, thanks very much for the test data.
Regards
Raj
P.S : For more information check this link
http://www.oracle.com/technology/oramag/oracle/04-mar/o24asktom.html
and search for "Analytics to the Rescue (Again)" in that page.
Edited by: R.Subramanian on Oct 22, 2008 4:52 AM
Changed count function to Sum function

When a process flow activity takes a long time to run.

Hello,
I have a process flow activity that sometimes takes a long time to run so that the process flow never ends. Is it possible that I can set the activity so that during a certain time that this has not been executed automatically flow process to continue?
I'm Using Oracle Warehouse Builder 11g on Windows Server 2003 R1.
Greetings and thanks.

What I've done in the past is just use a small polling procedure (PL/SQL) and a conditional transition in the process flow, depending on what the proc returns (Continue or Fail) then the flow of control in the Process is changed.
I think the key also is to not have too much paralellism going on too, that way it's easy to streamline the PF and remove slow moving processes to a more linear path (stopping bottle necks on your logical AND).
Edited by: NSNO on Apr 29, 2010 2:31 PM

It takes long time to load the parameter's value when running we run report

Hi,
It takes long time to load the parameter's value when running we run report. What could cause this? How to troubleshoot the behavior of the report? Could I use Profile and what events should i select?
Thanks

Hi jori5,
Based on my understanding, after changing the parameter, the report render very slow, right?
In Reporting Service, the total time to generate a report include TimeDataRetreval, TimeProcessing and TimeRendering. To analyze which section take much time, we can check the table Executionlog3 in the ReportServer database. For more information, please
refer to this article:
More tips to improve performance of SSRS reports.
In your scenario, since you mention the query spends less time, the delay might happens during report processing and report rendering section. So you should check Executionlog3 to check which section costs most of time, then you can refer to this article
to optimize your report:
Troubleshooting Reports: Report Performance.
If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
Best regards,
Qiuyun Yu

How to tune this SQL (takes long time to come up with results)

Dear all,
I have sum SQL which takes long time ... can any one help me to tune this.... thank You
SELECT SUM (n_amount)
FROM (SELECT DECODE (v_payment_type,
'D', n_amount,
'C', -n_amount
) n_amount, v_vou_no
FROM vouch_det a, temp_global_temp b
WHERE a.v_vou_no = TO_CHAR (b.n_column2)
AND b.n_column1 = :b5
AND b.v_column1 IN (:b4, :b3)
AND v_desc IN (SELECT v_trans_source_code
FROM benefit_trans_source
WHERE v_income_tax_app = :b6)
AND v_lob_code = DECODE (:b1, :b2, v_lob_code, :b1)
UNION ALL
SELECT DECODE (v_payment_type,
'D', n_amount,
'C', -n_amount
* -1 AS n_amount,
v_vou_no
FROM vouch_details a, temp_global_temp b
WHERE a.v_vou_no = TO_CHAR (b.n_column2)
AND b.n_column1 = :b5
AND b.v_column1 IN (:b12, :b11, :b10, :b9, :b8, :b7)
AND v_desc IN (SELECT v_trans_source_code
FROM benefit_trans_source
WHERE income_tax_app = :b6)
AND v_lob_code = DECODE (:b1, :b2, v_lob_code, :b1));
Thank You.....

Thanks a lot,
i did change the SQL it works fine but slows down my main query.... actually my main query is calling a function which does the sum......
here is the query.....?
select A.* from (SELECT a.n_agent_no, a.v_agent_code, a.n_channel_no, v_iden_no, a.n_cust_ref_no, a.v_agent_type, a.v_company_code,
a.v_company_branch, a.v_it_no, bfn_get_agent_name(a.n_agent_no) agentname,
PKG_AGE__TAX.GET_TAX_AMT(:P_FROM_DATE,:P_TO_DATE,:P_LOB_CODE,A.N_AGENT_NO) comm,
c.v_ird_region
FROM agent_master a, agent_lob b, agency_region c
WHERE a.n_agent_no = b.n_agent_no
AND a.v_agency_region = c.v_agency_region
AND :p_lob_code = DECODE(:p_lob_code,'ALL', 'ALL',b.v_line_of_business)
AND :p_channel_no = DECODE(:p_channel_no,1000, 1000,a.n_channel_no)
AND :p_agency_group = DECODE(:p_agency_group,'ALL', 'ALL',c.v_ird_region)
group by a.n_agent_no, a.v_agent_code, a.n_channel_no, v_iden_no, a.n_cust_ref_no, a.v_agent_type, a.v_company_code, a.v_company_branch, a.v_it_no, bfn_get_agent_name(a.n_agent_no) ,
BPG_AGENCY_GEN_ACL_TAX.BFN_GET_TAX_AMOUNT(:P_FROM_DATE,:P_TO_DATE,:P_LOB_CODE,A.N_AGENT_NO),
c.v_ird_region
ORDER BY c.v_ird_region, a.v_agent_code DESC)
A
WHERE (COMM < :P_VAL_IND OR COMM >=:P_VAL_IND1);
Any idea to make this faster....
Thank You...

[SOLVED] systemd-tmpfiles-clean takes a very long time to run

I've been having an issue for a while with systemd-tmpfiles-clean.service taking a very long time to run. I've tried to just ignore it, but it's really bothering me now.
Measuring by running:
# time systemd-tmpfiles --clean
systemd-tmpfiles --clean 11.63s user 110.37s system 10% cpu 19:00.67 total
I don't seem to have anything funky in any tmpfiles.d:
# ls /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/* /run/tmpfiles.d/* /etc/tmpfiles.d/* | pacman -Qo -
ls: cannot access /etc/tmpfiles.d/*: No such file or directory
error: No package owns /run/tmpfiles.d/kmod.conf
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/gvfsd-fuse-tmpfiles.conf is owned by gvfs 1.20.1-2
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/lastlog.conf is owned by shadow 4.1.5.1-9
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/legacy.conf is owned by systemd 212-3
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/libvirt.conf is owned by libvirt 1.2.4-1
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/lighttpd.conf is owned by lighttpd 1.4.35-1
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/lirc.conf is owned by lirc-utils 1:0.9.0-71
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/mkinitcpio.conf is owned by mkinitcpio 17-1
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/nscd.conf is owned by glibc 2.19-4
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/postgresql.conf is owned by postgresql 9.3.4-1
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/samba.conf is owned by samba 4.1.7-1
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/slapd.conf is owned by openldap 2.4.39-1
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/sudo.conf is owned by sudo 1.8.10.p2-1
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/svnserve.conf is owned by subversion 1.8.8-1
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/systemd.conf is owned by systemd 212-3
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/systemd-nologin.conf is owned by systemd 212-3
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/tmp.conf is owned by systemd 212-3
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/uuidd.conf is owned by util-linux 2.24.1-6
/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/x11.conf is owned by systemd 212-3
How do I debug why it is taking so long? I've looked in man 8 systemd-tmpfiles and on google, hoping to find some sort of --dubug option, but there seems to be none.
Is it some how possible to get a list of the directories that it looks at when it runs?
Anyone have any suggestions on how else to fix this.
Anyone else have this issue?
Thanks,
Gary
Last edited by garyvdm (2014-05-08 18:57:43)

Thank you very much falconindy. SYSTEMD_LOG_LEVEL=debug helped my find my issue.
The cause of the problem was thousands of directories in /var/tmp/ created by a test suite with a broken clean up method. systemd-tmpfiles-clean was recursing through these, but not deleting them.

SSRS 2012. ReportServer takes long time to be up.

SSRS 2012 Sp1
Hi guys,
I am using SSRS as my reporting platform, but I have always got the following issue.
SSRS ReportServer takes time to load.
The first time takes long, then less time but only if the ReprotServer web page is continuosly retrived.
HERE the problem:
If the ReprotServer page is not used after a short time (let me say 10 min), the page takes long time to be up again.
I have checked the configuration that is set as for default 12 hours.
Is there a way to speed up the ReportServer opening page time?
Thanks for your help

Hi Fasttrack2,
According to your description, you want to optimize the performance of your report. Right?
In this scenario, when your report page is not active for a short time, it will take long time to render again. This is because the you have the report timeout. You can select "Do not timeout report" in Processing. Please refer to the link below:
SQL Server Reporting Services – Timeout Settings
For the performance issue, it can be many reason cause the report running slowly. Please refer to the articles below to optimize the report:
More tips to improve performance of SSRS reports.
Reporting Services Performance and Optimization
Troubleshooting Reports: Report Performance
If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
Best Regards,
Simon Hou

Oracle report formatting takes long time

hi
i am using oracle 10g Application Server 9.0.4.0.0 on Red hat linux AS 3
oracle reports are run thru JSP's
some reports take long time to execute though query in it if executed on sql plus are fast.
it is fond that that formatting is going on for those reports
what might be the reason for this??
is the data fetched first and then formatting takes place as per data??
waiting for reply
Avinash

hi
i am using oracle 10g Application Server 9.0.4.0.0 on Red hat linux AS 3
oracle reports are run thru JSP's
some reports take long time to execute though query in it if executed on sql plus are fast.
it is fond that that formatting is going on for those reports
what might be the reason for this??
is the data fetched first and then formatting takes place as per data??
waiting for reply
Avinash

Runbook takes long time to complete

Hi,
I created a customized flow to get the data from MS SQL. The runbook is working fine but it takes long time to complete. Is there any option to increase speed or something like that..?
Regards,
Soundarajan.

If you look on the Log tab you can see which activity that took the longest. What does you runbook looks like? If you have for example a Run .NET script activity you can do some tuning on the runbook server. But I think a good start is to share a
figure of your runbook.
Anders Bengtsson | Microsoft PFE | blog at http://www.contoso.se

Normal is takes long time

Dear Experts, i tried to enable audit option in oracle 10.2 .0 database which is running on windows box, after set this command , i tried to restart the DB with shutdown (only) option.
ALTER SYSTEM SET audit_trail=db SCOPE=SPFILE;
but its takes long time to complete i checked the alert log file , its showing
ALTER SYSTEM SET audit_trail='DB' SCOPE=SPFILE;
Wed Feb 01 12:23:48 2012
Starting background process EMN0
EMN0 started with pid=29, OS id=4836
Wed Feb 01 12:23:49 2012
Shutting down instance: further logons disabled
Wed Feb 01 12:23:50 2012
Stopping background process QMNC
Streams Apply Server P001 pid=16 OS id=3708 stopped
Wed Feb 01 12:23:51 2012
Stopping background process CJQ0
Streams Apply Reader P000 pid=15 OS id=3660 stopped
Wed Feb 01 12:23:52 2012
Errors in file e:\oracle\product\10.2.0\admin\std\bdump\psacc_p000_3660.trc:
ORA-10388: parallel query server interrupt (failure)
Streams Apply Server P004 pid=25 OS id=2124 stopped
Wed Feb 01 12:23:52 2012
Errors in file e:\oracle\product\10.2.0\admin\std\bdump\psacc_p004_2124.trc:
ORA-10388: parallel query server interrupt (failure)
Wed Feb 01 12:23:53 2012
Errors in file e:\oracle\product\10.2.0\admin\std\bdump\psacc_p001_3708.trc:
ORA-10388: parallel query server interrupt (failure)
Streams Apply Server P002 pid=23 OS id=2404 stopped
Wed Feb 01 12:23:53 2012
Errors in file e:\oracle\product\10.2.0\admin\std\bdump\psacc_p002_2404.trc:
ORA-10388: parallel query server interrupt (failure)
Streams Apply Server P003 pid=24 OS id=1372 stopped
Wed Feb 01 12:23:54 2012
Errors in file e:\oracle\product\10.2.0\admin\std\bdump\psacc_p003_1372.trc:
ORA-10388: parallel query server interrupt (failure)
Wed Feb 01 12:23:54 2012
Stopping background process MMNL
Wed Feb 01 12:23:54 2012
Streams APPLY A001 with pid=17, OS id=3400 stopped
Wed Feb 01 12:23:55 2012
Stopping background process MMON
Wed Feb 01 12:23:57 2012
Shutting down instance (normal)
License high water mark = 21
Wed Feb 01 12:23:57 2012
Stopping Job queue slave processes
Wed Feb 01 12:23:57 2012
Job queue slave processes stopped
Wed Feb 01 12:28:57 2012
Active process 2572 user 'SYSTEM' program 'ORACLE.EXE (SHAD)'
Active process 3156 user 'SYSTEM' program 'ORACLE.EXE (SHAD)'
Active process 3416 user 'SYSTEM' program 'ORACLE.EXE (SHAD)'
Active process 5596 user 'SYSTEM' program 'ORACLE.EXE (SHAD)'
Active process 5200 user 'SYSTEM' program 'ORACLE.EXE (SHAD)'
Active process 5980 user 'SYSTEM' program 'ORACLE.EXE (SHAD)'
SHUTDOWN: waiting for logins to complete.
Wed Feb 01 12:43:28 2012
MMNL absent for 1203 secs; Foregrounds taking over
there is no more info after this line..... can any one please help on this , how to solve this issue... waiting for morethan 40 mins stil is running... guide me to proceed next step to complete this.... thanks in advance

Use anothe command prompt and type sqlplus.
For e.g in my system.
C:\Documents and Settings\ranjit>sqlplus
SQLPlus: Release 11.2.0.1.0 Production on Wed Feb 1 13:46:33 2012*
Copyright (c) 1982, 2010, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Enter user-name: sys as sysdba
Enter password:
Connected to:
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
*SQL>
Once you saw this.. type "shu abort;"
This will abruptly shutdown the database. It is safe to run in non production databases however. And while starting up, it will to the recovery(which may take some time again to startup database).
Regards

Take longer time to run sql worksheet

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for