Tax Clg a/c in FBCJ with O/I Mngt - Urgent

Hi sap gurus..
In FBT configuration i have created paid accounts and the same has to be posted in payable accounts also..for payable accounts i have created GL masters with Open item management. In F-02 it is working promptly , but in FBCJ when iam going to post entry with FBT calculation iam encountered with following error message -
NAF5076
"Tax clearing account XXXXXXX may not have Open item management "
Sytem is showing the payable account with O/I management.
What to do..plss suggest me it is very urgent to me..
Thanks & regards
Ramki

Hi,
By this way system will post the currect for the transaction.
Account determination was three levels.
1) Organizational Level
2) Material Level
3) Business Transaction Level
Organizational Level:
When ever we have doing GR/IR with reference to PO system automaticaly checks for chart of accounts which we have assined to our company code
We have already assigned the chart of accounts to company code
Next searches for Valuation grouping code for valid valuation area.
We have already assigned the valuation grouping code to our valuation areas at OMWD screen
When ever we have doing GR/IR with reference to PO it will get the valid valuation from there.
Material Level
We are maintaing the accounting data for valuation area for particular material
Valuation class is assigned to Material type with Account category reference at OMSK screen
We already done the qty/value updating particular material against valuation area.
Business Transaction Level
We have assigned the value string, transaction keys account modifier to particular MVT
When ever we have doing GR/IR
It checks the chart of accounts, valid valuation grouping code for particular valuation area, valuation class through material type, value string, transaction keys & account modifier which we have assigned mvt.
Note: We have already defined the transaction keys, they are determined automatically from the transaction (invoice verification) or the movement type (inventory management). All you have to do is assign the relevant G/L account to each posting transaction.
By this way system will pick the correct account.
Thanks & Regards
Anilkumar Dalai

Similar Messages

  • Withholding tax lines are being cleared along with other line items

    Hi All,
    While doing J1INCHLN(payment making of TDS), system giving error i.e.
    "Withholding tax lines are being aleared along with other line items"
    Please suggest me in this issue...it would be great help for me.
    Thanks,
    Saisri

    Hi,
    As per my analysis we found some documents, here We have made advance payment to vendors with TDS and again rised invoce to vendors with TDS and these documents have been nockedoff in F-54.
    We have many documents of such nature and as per me it is because of these documents  the system is throwing error. Pls. advice as to how to proceed on this.
    Thanks,
    Saisri

  • Down pmnts with taxes are not permitted when processing with jur.code (Message no. FS206)

    Hi Guys,
    I am facing very critical issue on down Payment request, to process with saperate Tax Value.
    We are supporting on Roll-out for Germany. We have implemented all standard SAP processes in the Project. We have also implemented many interfaces and one of the Interface is Sabrix Tax Engine (Tax Jurisdiction Code).
    As per the Germany legal requirement, the Tax has to get calculated whenever the funds gets transfered from one Bank Account to Another Bank Account.
    Coming to the issue: In the Customer Down Payment scenario, we are creating the Down payment request for Customer and as per Germany local requirement the Tax of 19% has to get calculated on Down payment.
    For an Example: We have the Sales Order Contract Value of 100,000.00 EUR and we are creating the Down Payment reqeust of 10% which is 10000 EUR + Tax 19% 1900 EUR.
    We are trying to post the Down Payment request in F-37 and we get the issue "Down pmnts with taxes are not permitted when processing with jur.code". This error is appearing due to Sabrix Tax engine (Tax Jurisdiction Code) has implemented in our System.
    We have gone through the SAP notes 97288 and 213567 and understood that the Standard SAP does not support us to post the Down Payment request with Separate Tax Value, when the External Tax Engine has implemented.
    I request you to suggest me, if you have already seen this issue in any of your Projects and fixed through the work-around solution. We have been working on work-around since 2 weeks, however no result.
    Below is the error message:
    Down pmnts with taxes are not permitted when processing with jur.code
    Message no. FS206

    HI Preeti,
    Thanks for your response. We have already seen the similar SAP notes and the SAP notes explains that the "Down pmnts with taxes cannot be done along with with jur.code". The only solution is to post the DP without Tax.
    However there might be some workaround which can be done in SAP, to process the Down Payment/Advance Payments with Tax Value along with Jurisdiction Code. I would like to know this.
    Did any one seen this case in your experiece, if yes, what is the work-around solution?.
    Need your help guys!,...
    Regards,
    Damodar Naidu

  • With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term

    Hi Friends,
    We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
    Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
    As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
    With holding tax rate is 0%,
    Based on modified net amount calculation
    and
    Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
    When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
    Which causes difference in 1099 – misc vendors
    Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
    Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
    Payment going out=
    $1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 – 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
    With holding base calculation =
    $ 1000 – 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
    Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 – 900 = 8.98
    Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
    Moreover, please tell me if it’s normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
    Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
    Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM

    Dear All
    i am also having the same problem. The example is
    Net invoice Value   = $ 100,000
    Input Tax @ 15%   = $  15,000
    Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
    Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
    On payment the system behavior should be
    Debit  Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
    Debit  Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
    Credit  W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325  ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
    Credit Bank Account  = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
    However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
    Debit  Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
    Debit  Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
    Credit  W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220  ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
    Credit Bank Account  = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
    this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
    Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
    Regards
    Bilal Athar

  • TS1702 I just bought a new iphone 5S and once turned on and pushed the button restore from Icloud, I'm stil stuck in this section i can't do anything plus i turned it off and on again and still not working, please provide me with a solution very urgently!

    I just bought a new iphone 5S and once turned on and pushed the button restore from Icloud, I'm stil stuck in this section i can't do anything plus i turned it off and on again and still not working, please provide me with a solution very urgently!!
    Kindly note also that i did not work on this iphone before, i just turned it on and i cannot connect it to the itune and restore it as the itune cannot read the device since i'm not able to reach my home screen, I am stuck in my restoring screen.
    Please help!!!!

    You dont have any data on your phone yet right?
    If you dont connect your device to the computer and
    Press and hold the Sleep/Wake button and the Home button together for at least 15 seconds, until the Apple logo appears.
    after that click okay when it says itunes has detected an iphone in recovery mode. Then click restore
    after that try again

  • I cant use the highlight, underline, or strikethrough function in a specific pdf file. The file isnt locked. I used to highlight texts from that file before the latest update. The problem occurs only with that file. Urgent need. Please help. Thanks!

    i cant use the highlight, underline, or strikethrough function in a specific pdf file. The file isnt locked. I used to highlight texts from that file before the latest update. The problem occurs only with that file. Urgent need. Please help. Thanks!

    Chester31,
    Thank you very much for sharing your file with us!  Now that we are able to reproduce the problem at our end, you may stop sharing the file on Acrobat.com.
    Do you know when this problem (for not being able to add new highlight/strikeout/underline) has started?  Did you update your iOS from 7.x to 8.0 recently?
    We will continue investigating the problem and let you know what we find.
    Thank you again for your help.

  • Withholding Tax on Advance paid having issues with Document splitting

    Dear Experts
    Our client deducts TDS on the Advance amount paid and on posting of Invoices from the Vendors. The documents are posted with withholding Tax types configured for these purpose in F-48 and FB60 respectively. Document splitting has been activated in the system with all required configuration.
    The problem arises when we try to clear the advance amount against the Invoice along with the balance payment in F-53 if the invoice has more than one expense line posted to different Cost Centers in FB60. The system gives an error message " Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 004 not filled ". Please follow the example given below for better understanding.
    Advance posting:
    vendor a/c....dr   (Profit center 3)
    To bank Clearing (Profit center 3)
    To TDS on payment
    Invoice:
    Expense ....dr  (Cost Center1 / profit Center 1)
    Expense ....dr (Cost Center 2 / Profit Center 2)
    To vendor a/c
    To TDS on Invoice
    Up to here the document splitting works fine with Profit Centers and segments getting displayed in all line items in GL view. The issue comes when we select both the documents in F-53 and try to pay out the balance amount.
    Please note the issue does not crop up if we do not populate the withholding tax code while posting the advance entry. The system automatically posts to the relevant profit centers and segments in F-53. But this is not the business scenario.
    Please let me know if somebody can throw some light on the above issue.
    Edited by: sid_das on Dec 12, 2011 5:32 PM

    Resolved at our end by tweaking the splitting rule to match the Business requirement.

  • Tax error - audit data - table ETXDCJ with wrong data

    Hi,
       I am working on audit_data file that external tax system receives from SAP. table entries in 'ETXDCJ' are fed to audit_data file which are wrong. Please let me know how this table gets the entries. Any transaction or steps that I need to know to replicate the issue. We have this wrong tax data issue only for certain sales document type not for all. Please let me know.
    Thanking you
    Ram.

    External tax calculation is a setting that you have to enable in configuration. Every document has a tax procedure and pricing procedure assigned to it. So when you create a sales order, based on these two your prices and taxes are calculated. I am not how it works, but I think the external tax calculating software will calculate and send tax documents back to SAP. These are the ones that get stored in the table ETXDCJ,ETXDCH and ETXDCI. This update function module seems to be inserting it EXTERNAL_TAX_DOC_INSERT_DB.
    What is it that you are calling error? Are calculations wrong, or is it something else? Are you sure it is document type not cutomer or state that is influencing this? Look in config for the external tax calculation under 'Financial Accoutning Global Settings' as follows:
    Implementation Guide for R/3 Customizing (IMG)
    -->Financial Accounting
       -->Financial Accounting Global Settings
          -->Tax on Sales/Purchases
             -->External Tax Calculation
    I am wondering if your issue is with the tax jurisdictions and your condition table entries. If you are sure that it is always with a particular document type, compare the document type settings with another one that is working.
    If this helps, please don't forget to reward.
    Srinivas

  • Tax Rate Determination in Credit Memos With Ref to Invoices

    The requirement in US is that when the customer has changed his address to a different region, from that where the services was supplied (The region in which the customer (ship-to party) was residing when the invoice was raised) and if a credit memo is raised with reference to this invoice, then the taxes applicable on the credit memo for this customer should be the rates applicable for the state where the original invoice was raised. However currently in SAP the new customer address is updated in the billing document (invoice that was raised for the region where the customer had his place of business previously) and hence the original region code in the invoice will not be available and will be overridden with new region code.
    Consider the following example:
    1 - Invoice raised on 01-Jan-2010 to a customer whose region is Florida and tax rate is "X %"
    2 - On 01-Feb-2010 the customer in Florida changes his place of business to Texas region.
    3 - On 01-March-2010 a credit memo is raised with reference to the invoice dated 01-Jan-2010 u2013 On this credit memo the tax rate applicable will be of the region of Texas u2013 Example u201CY%u201D
    The requirement is that in the credit memo the system should capture the original region code or there should be a provision to change the region code of the customer (ship-to party) at line item level u2013 so that the tax determined is applicable to the region where the customeru2019s place of business originally existed.
    From our side we did check the SAP screen for Creation of contract/Order (VA41/VA01) u2013 However we were unable to find the customer region field in these screens at line item level.
    We request you to please look into this at the earliest and let us know what the options that exist for this are.
    Please also let us know should you require any clarifications with reference to the above requirement.
    Regards
    Siddharth Sridhar

    Hi Siddharth,
    As for the region code that you mentioned, in fact yes, you can change during transaction creation, and Region is coming from the customer master record that you maintained.
    You can find it at the Item level --> Partners, but you will not be able to change the Region there.
    To change it, double click on the Sold-to Party at Header level, then select Sold-to Party --> Details.. Here you can change the Region accordingly.  It will reflect accordingly at the Item level --> Partners.
    Note: This change will not change the central master data maintained for this customer. It will only affect this document.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks.

  • What is the tax percentage on the Macbook Pro with Retina Display in the US

    I am interested in buying the new Macbook Pro with Retina Display. I would just like to know what the tax percentage of the price is when buying in the US???

    The price quoted does not include tax which is determined by the state/city where sold.  There is not a Federal tax as in Europe with the VAT.
    State taxes can run 3-10% or somewhere in that range.

  • Tax condition value not getting posted with retroactive billing

    Hi All
    Due to price reduction from previous date, I am processing retro billing for billing documents. For target credit memo to be created, i have maintained the pricing procedure with condition type PDIF. Now when i create the credit memo with tcode VFRB, it only considers pr00 condition value for posting the difference with PDIF. Tax condition value is not being considered here.
    Are there any other changes required to make in pricing procedure?
    Please let me know the method to fix the same.
    Thanks
    Deepak Mehmi

    Hello
    For this I can think of one solution, where
    1. you have to create a new pricing pricing for retroactive billing.
    2. in that pricing procedure don't assign any account key to base price condition type, where as maintain a revenue account key for PDIF condition type.
    3. calculated tax condition types based on PDIF instead of base price condition type, do have relevant account keys for account determination of those tax condition types.
    I hope this can assist you.
    Thanks & Regards
    JP

  • TAX code custmisaion for Overseas Company with local Tax code

    Hi Gurus...
    I am facing following scenario:
    **My company is set ups as overseas company / company code  curr / local Curr = overseas Curr, My group currency is local currency / home country curr.
    **I like to raise PO for a vendor who is local and supplying goods locally, invoicing in local currency for Overseas company. Goods will be used locally.
    I like to know how should I configure this from TAX perspective.
    Thanks
    Hiren
    Edited by: Hiren Mazumdar on Mar 6, 2009 4:04 AM

    Hi
    <u>SPRO Path - hope this will help you in customizing </u>
    1.
    SRM Server -> Cross-Appl Basic settings -> Tax Calculation ->Determine Tax Code for Country/Product Category.
    2.
    SRM Server -> Cross-Appl Basic settings -> Transaction Tax engine -> Define Tax Settings .
    <b>Please go through the links below -></b>
    Re: Tax Calculation
    Re: Tax code T1 does not exist for jurisdiction code error in shopping basket
    BBP_DET_TAXCODE_BADI is not setting the Tax Code !  :-(
    Tax code is not changing in back-end
    Tax code
    Tax code T1 does not exist for jurisdiction code error in shopping basket
    Change tax code in SC
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Sales Tax Gl ac is not posted with Bus.Area & Profit Centr

    while Release to Accounting from SD Module, Business Area & Profit
    Centre is not getting updated or populated. We have to make the field
    status as optional, then only it works, but the business area & Profit
    Centre is updated with Blanks. Can it take the default values from trxn
    3keh. Is there any user exit, where we can write our own code to
    populate, while release to accounting.
    thanks
    amit

    Hi,
    Please check the validation with your FI consultant in the transaction code: GGB0
    regards
    bvdv

  • Tax calculation matter - GL a/c with service tax chargeable

    Dear Experts,
    I really do not understand why this happen. Any expert can help me? Thank you.
    GL posting for C/N issued:-
    Car Park reversal         129.03
    Service Tax 5%               6.45
    Total =                        135.48
    <PROBLEM>
    Document C/N printed as:-
    Car Park reversal                     129.02
    Service Tax 5%                           6.45
    Total =                                    135.48

    Rounding-off rules used in program corrected

  • Tax value is differ in PO printpreview & Item details..urgent

    Hi guru's
    I created 1 PO with Tax code as 18 (12.5% RM Deductible).
    In print priview it is showing 12.5% deductible & 4% non deductible..
    But in PO item details - invoice column- Taxes -- it is showing only 12.5% deductible..
    please send me solution ..Urgent
    Thanks
    sap-mm

    Can u explain me detailed manner, wht would be problem..
    So that i can have clear idea about this issue ..
    Thanks
    sap-mm

Maybe you are looking for