Tax condition value not getting posted with retroactive billing

Hi All
Due to price reduction from previous date, I am processing retro billing for billing documents. For target credit memo to be created, i have maintained the pricing procedure with condition type PDIF. Now when i create the credit memo with tcode VFRB, it only considers pr00 condition value for posting the difference with PDIF. Tax condition value is not being considered here.
Are there any other changes required to make in pricing procedure?
Please let me know the method to fix the same.
Thanks
Deepak Mehmi

Hello
For this I can think of one solution, where
1. you have to create a new pricing pricing for retroactive billing.
2. in that pricing procedure don't assign any account key to base price condition type, where as maintain a revenue account key for PDIF condition type.
3. calculated tax condition types based on PDIF instead of base price condition type, do have relevant account keys for account determination of those tax condition types.
I hope this can assist you.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Similar Messages

TAX condition value not getting calculated

Hi Gurus,
At my client we are having this strange issue in pricing when invoice creation. We've set up copy control rules as copy all unchanged. When I tried creating invoice, all the elements are getting copied, but the tax value is not getting created. We've delivery to invoice copy control rules, so that we can copy freight and price source is E (delivery/sales order). e.g.
In sales order we have following elements with values:
Price $1000
discount 10% value will be 100
tax5% value will be $45. Total value becomes $ 945
In invoice, it should copy all the elements unchanged, but we are getting following values:
Price $1000
discount 10% value will be 100
tax5% instead of showing value $45, system doesn't show anything. Total value becomes $900.
I checked all the config, including pricing and all the copy control rules. I'm not sure what I'm missing.
Please provide some inputs!!
Thanks,
Ketan

First check the root cause of miss ing TAX condition type in biling through Pricing Analysis.
To do that Billing Doc - Item - Conditions tab - click Analysis Button
Then select the missing TAX condition type for knowing the error.
Also, check the service render date in billing doc.
You can find this Biling doc - Item - Item Detail Tab - Price data
Take note of the date for Serv.rendered
And in the condition record (VK12 / VK13) for Tax condition type.
Check the validity date of condition type.
The date for service render sholud lie in the validity date maintain in condition record.
Regards
JP

VPRS condition type not getting computed while retro billing.

Dear All,
I have an issue while generation of Reto billing using the T.Code : VFRB.While running VFRB the values are getting computed correctly and the supplimentary debit / credit note gets created.
But the values for the condition type VPRS is not getting computed and getting transfered to CO-PA.
On pricing analysis agaist VPRS i am getting the message (Condition ignored (requirement 004 not fulfilled)).
The Item category used is TAN and the Determine cost Indicator is marked.Also while doing a sales invoice the VPRS condition type is getting computed and the value is posted in CO - PA.
What would be the reason for the error .Could some one suggest a solution .Kindlye help.
Regards,
K.Vivek

Hello vivek,
this is usually caused by userexit. Please check userexit_pricing_prepare_tkomp userexit_number_range using in rv60afzz.
Best regards,
Ivano.

FINT interest values not getting posting

Hi guru's,
In Test run execution, I can see the ruesults, after executing the T.code FINT.
But removing the test run check box and executing the updation mode, I am getting the below error.
After serching some SCN theads (http://scn.sap.com/thread/1223076), Still I am not able to solve the problem.
OBV1 setting are as follws:
Kindly advise where I have gone wrong....
Thanks & regards,
Mariks

Hi Mariks,
Your's first screen shot is showing the result is incomplete status. let us have details GL accounts names for 300105 and 400400.
Try it once with mentioned below settings.
Acc. Symbol               Currency                              GL A/c
0001                           INR                                      300105(Interest received account)
1000                           INR                                      +++++++++
Regards,
Singaiah Pathuri(Singh)

KONV not getting updated with new condition type value

Hi,
I have created a new condition type for a pricing procedure. But table KONV-KAWRT is not getting updated with any value. Can anyone help me this.
Thanks
Shweta

Hi Vasu,
It was created in the same way then I have assigned calculation formula . For invoice it is comming fine but for the intercompany billing it is not showing any value in Contition tab for this particular condition type. For this when I checked in KNOV table it is showing condition type but the value (KONV_KAWART) is comming out zero and due to this reason it is not showing value in intercompany billing ->condition. Do I need to write code for this?
Thanks,
Shweta

COPA Documents not getting posted - Doc with unauthorized busi.trans SD00

Dear Experts,
COPA Documents are not getting posted, although billing /accounting documents are getting posted
We are getting the below error message, when KE4ST is executed
Kindly share your inputs for this issue
Document with unauthorized business transaction "SD00"
Message no. KE/AD604
Diagnosis
Document 6000000026 cannot be transferred to Profitability Analysis (CO-PA) because the business transaction"SD00'"(Billing document) is not profit-related.
System Response
The document is not posted to CO-PA.
Procedure
If you decide that the document does contain data relevant to CO-PA and that it therefore should be posted to CO-PA, change your Customizing settings accordingly. Otherwise you can ignore this message.
Advance Thanks,
Sanjai

Hi,
   1. First please check if COPA is active in the system i.e. tcode KEKE
   2. Then check if operating concern is active in tcode KEA0
   3. If so then check if billing document has an account assignment to PA segment. If not then maybe you have changed the account assignment in OKC9.
   4. If all the 3 conditions above are satisfied then you need to check if this is a made-to-order scenario (MTO). A made-to-order scenario can be identified in COPA in that the billing doc will have an account assignment to a sales order in addition to a
PA segment (field vbap-kzvbr = 'E' and vbap-vbelv = sales order no).
If the above conditions are satisfied then from a COPA point of view it is a MTO. In this case the invoice will be assigned to the sales order and will not be directly transferred to COPA. With the order settlement the costs and the revenues (invoice) will then be posted to COPA.
regards
Waman

Jsf page not getting refreshed with updated values?

Hi All,
- managed-bean - session scope.
- On a request, Even though, I am updating the bean's properties(values), my Jsf page is not getting refreshed with updated values as it is displaying the older values.
Can anybody throw some light?
Thanks in advance.
- Sri

Please try to give us more information, follow BalusC suggestion.
For this moment I only can say you that the more common cause to this problem (in my expirence) is that you have problems with your conversion/validate phase.

Different tax condition value at the time of GR as compared to PO

Hi All,
The issus is as follows ;
We have maintained the tax condition type JIPC (Input Sales Tax) by t-code FV11 as 3% and subsequently created the PO.
But when we are doing GR against the same PO in Accounting Document the GR/IR clearing Account is getting posted with the value of tax 2%(Non deductable tax).
We have checked the validity period of condition type JIPC on day of GR is 3% only.Despite showing the PO screen 3% of non deductable tax accounting document of GR is picking the 2% of tax in GR/IR clearing account.
Thx in advance.
Shiwanshu

Hi Anji ,
   thanks to reply. but my problem is some deffrent. I take an example for that:
I am doing MIGO at this time PO price was 100 , VAT 4% condition JVRD now post this document suppose mat doc is 5900000021.
I will get in my report
Doc no.:5900000021
price   :100
VAT    : 4
Condi: JVRD
now some one make change in this PO like price 150 , VAT 3% condintio JVRN.
if now i will execute my report then i will get.
Doc no.:5900000021
price   :150
VAT    : 3
Condi: JVRN
but i need old data when GR wad post as above.

How to block particular condition type not being posted

Hi,
We don't want a particular condition type ( customized & accruel ) to be posted into accounting when creating a billing. That condition type is deleted and after that this is how it works now.
1. When a billing is cretaed from a new sale order ( which does not have that condition type ) it works fine.
2. When a billing is created from a sale order which refers to the old sale order which in turn has this condition type, then this conditon type is posted into accounting.
Can some one help in this issue so that I want to block this condition type being get posted in accounting. Is there any Userexit or can it be done with other options. I am an ABAPer, please give specific answer.

Hi Jagadish,
The reason why we do account determination is that we would want the system to post the respective amounts to respective G/L accounts automatically. What amounts to be posted to what G/L accounts is decided by the Account keys .
Now if for a particular condition type in the pricing procedure if you remove Account key the system will not post to the G/L accounts. But generally in this case I believe while creating the Bill system will throw an error in account determination.
For that what you can do is create completely new accont key and assign a provisional G/L account which is not to be included in your Balance Sheet accounts or P & L accounts (can be restriscted by FI Guys).
But remember to use a completely new oricing proicedure for this case.
Hope this helps.....
J Nagesh

Data is not getting posted in ABAP Proxy.

Hi,
I am working on File to ABAPProxy scenario. The data is not going to proxy.
In PI sxmb_moni is status is successfull and in the R3 sxmb_moni the status is successfull. But the data is not getting posted in the tables(ABAPProxy). I had checked the inbound and oubound queues. And with the same input data, abapers cheked their code in Abapproxy, then the table is getting updated. When we trigger from PI, the tables are not getting updated.Please help me.
Thanks,
Pragathi.

Hi,
The problem may be
Case 1: Cache is not getting refreshed(Check SXI_CACHE)
Case 2: The Queue Is blocked (Check SMQ1 & SMQ2)
Regards,
Sainath

VALUES NOT GETTING ADDED IN JAVA DICTIONARY

HIII ,
AM DOING AN APPLICATION IN WHICH I AM TRYING TO INSERT VALUES IN A TABLE(CREATED THRU JAVA DICTIONARY), USING EJBS(ENTITY BEAN AND SESSION BEAN) AND COMMAND BEAN..AND WEBDYNPRO....
    AFTER DEPLOYMENT EVRYTHNG IS RUNNING FINE BUT VALUES NOT GETTING ADDED IN THE TABLE...
THE CODE FOR THE "ADD" BUTTON IS :
wdContext.currentEmp_cmdElement().modelObject().add(wdContext.currentEmp_cmdElement().getEmpno(),wdContext.currentEmp_cmdElement().getEmpname());
THE CODE FOR ADD function IN COMMANDBEAN IS
public void add(String empno,String empname){
          try {
                 local.createdata(empno,empname);
               } catch (Exception e) {
                    e.printStackTrace();}
PLZZ DO HELP OUT!!!

The message in simple English just means that "You are doing something really bad" !!! It is absolutely not the communication problem, but understanding problem.
Though you may be executing the same function using SE37 or in the webshop application through JCo, the runtime context is different and without knowing what exactly your Z rfc is doing, it is very difficult to help. To start with, the userid - that is who is running the RFC is different in both situations. In SE37, it is the logon user and in the web, depending upon whether the connection is stateless or stateful, it could be the anonymous ICSS user or the logged in user. Here again, if you have used UME, it is the user id and if you have used ALIAS user, then it is the alias user id. This is just an example. Your runtime context can be different due to many other reasons too.
So, to make this simpler - what is that you are trying to do?
BTW, try not to create multiple threads for the same issue..

Open Sales Order values not getting updated after run RVKRED77 & RVKRED88

Hiiii,
In Production Server. We run the reports RVKRED77 & RVKRED88. Credit info structure and and Open Sales Order values not getting updated. In FD32, Status - Sales value it showing '0". At the time of creating Sales Order Dynamic Credit check not happening coz of Tables S066 not updating. Please provide me Solution.
Best Regards,
Sridhar . P

Dear Heagal,
I followed your suggestions and implemented in the Development and moved the changes in to Quality Server. I tested it thoroughly by creating New Customer and maintained Credit Limit. I come to know that Problem is in all Servers. I made 3 changes.
1. In Pricing Procedure Sub Total A it was not maintained against Net value. I placed it.
2. Removed Credit groups for Delivery Type.
3. In OVA8 i maintained Max. Doc Value :99,999,999.00 before it was with 1.00
I checked the OMO1 Settings it was Asynchronous. As SAP Notes Suggesting to use Synchronous but here it's a client setting. So, It's Can't possible to change. Changes will affect other Company Codes.
Tested both in DVP and QTY Dynamic Credit Check is working Perfectly and Status in FD33 Sales Value field getting update.
If i move these changes in to Production, Will i need to run the reports again or not? How it will affect on Old Cusomer Billing and Credit Limit data. For few of the Customers the Credit Limit data it was exceeded. Please provide me advice. The issue need to be Solved immediately.
Best Regards,
Sridhar

Invoice is not getting posted to accounts it is showing the export error

invoice is not getting posted to accounts, it is showing an error of foreign trade / export data. where as it is with in the country. it is maintained for the plants abroad stock transport order.

A stock transport order to a location overseas etails crossing national borders and change of legal regulations. hence you need to maintina FT data. Please check the FT data in the billing header and item and maintian them. They are simple items like customs offices meas of transport...
This will give you a green status from the red status you will initially have. Then you can post the invoice.
regds

VA00 condition type not getting determined for the returns order

Hi All,
I have a case where VA00 condition type not getting determined for the returns order that has been created with respect to the billing document.
When the pricing conditions are being copied from invoice it is getting copied but later it is getting deleted in the include LV61AA42.
Note:VA00 condition type is getting deleted from the internal table tkomv[].
If any one came across this scenario can you please help me.
Request your valuable inputs

Hi,
Please check the copy control setting in VTAA.
Maintain the pricing type as "D" at item category level for the respective document type .
Hope this will resolve your issue.
Regards,
Krishna O

Files are not getting posted in destination directory,how to trace in XI

Hi,
our scenario is proxy to file.
We are posting files of .TRG and .DAT format in destination directory.Due to less space in destination directory, files only .TRG files are getting posted but .DAT are not getting posted.but i have checked in XI system SXMB_MONI,no error message is coming.message is getting processed successfully.
why it is not visible and to monitor that files are not saved at the destination.
Is this normal with XI that we can not see of files are really saved?

Hi,
> it should generate two files as per scenario but only one file is getting generated due to less space,
NO.
If No Space, The error will pops out in RWB .
Check the directory of the File Adapter you are using
Regards
Agasthuri Doss

Tax condition value not getting posted with retroactive billing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for