Tax code - test scenario

I have recently updated an internal tax table applied to stock options for employees. Can someone please guide me on how I will do a test scenario for this?

The Input and Output Tax has to be specified in FTXP, then go to T.code: OBCL then allocate the Input and output tax code to the company code and save.

Similar Messages

Service Tax 10.3% + Vat 5 Tax code

Hi Expert,
I have to make PO for Licenses Purchase which include two Tax component.
Service Tax 10.3% & Vat 5%.
Service Tax is Applicable on Basic
Vat Is applicable on Basis + Service Tax
Service Tax & Vat both are refundable
In our system we don't have Tax Code for this, Please help me with step how to create the Tax Code.
Scenario
     Nos     = 100
     Rate     = 200
     Basis = 20000
Service Tax 10.30% =      2060
Total      =      22060
Vat      5%     = 1103
Final Amt      = 23163
Regards,
GHS

Hi
It is possible to have the scenario in place. The Service Tax would be calculated @ 10.3%. You configure the service tax for india as per SAP Note 921634. There after total this up in a sub step. There after, calculate Excise Duty on Base Amounts and total them up. On this base, calculate VAT, CST, Additional VAT and Surcharge on VAT.
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

Tax code error in Depreciation Test run

Hello
Can anybody help me understand how I can get round the following:
I am doing a test depreciation run, but against all the assets there is the same error, 'Tax code ** does not exist for jurisdiction code ****'. I do not wish to maintain the tax code for this jurisdiction code, but how do I get round this. Is there a setting somewhere I have missed?
Any advice is appreciated. Thanks

The Input and Output Tax has to be specified in FTXP, then go to T.code: OBCL then allocate the Input and output tax code to the company code and save.

Tax code error while posting Planned delivery costs in Import Scenario

Hi!!!!!
I am getting on error while posting Planned delivery costs in MIRO for Import Purchase Order with zero value tax code v0. The error is
"Tax code V0 country IN does not exist in procedure ZAXINN"
For Import I defined a pricing procedure which contains all condition types for CVD, Ecess, SEcess, Additional Customs Duty and Others.
While making Import PO im putting V0 tax code. I assigned the Tax Codes to the Company code.
Please let me know what config is missing.
Regards,
Durga

Is you ZAXINN assigned to the country India
and is your taxcode (created in FTXP) created for country India?
kr
hakan

UDF For Retrieving the Tax Code based on PO

Hi all,
Mine is a file to Idoc scenario.
I wrote a FM to retrieve the Tax Code based on PO .
Created the udf which directly gets the Taxcode from the r/3 with out importing in to the imported objects,is this correct i never tried this before.
Find the UDF for the Same.
final String    CHANNEL_NAME = "GeneratedReceiverChannel_RFC",
     VALNOTFOUND = "VALUE_NOT_FOUND",
     SAPRFCNS = "urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions",
     TAG_FM = "Z_P_INT012_RFC_LOOKUP",
     TAG_TAX_CODE = "T_TAX_CODE",
     TAG_TAX_CODE_P = "TAX_CODE";
AbstractTrace trace = container.getTrace();
          DocumentBuilderFactory factory = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance();
          DocumentBuilder builder = null;
          factory.setNamespaceAware(false);
          factory.setValidating(false);
          try {
               builder = factory.newDocumentBuilder();
          } catch (Exception e) {
               trace.addWarning("Error creating DocumentBuilder - " + e.getMessage());
          Document docReq = null;
          try {
               // Building up RFC Request Document
               docReq = builder.newDocument();
               Node root = docReq.appendChild(docReq.createElementNS(SAPRFCNS, TAG_FM));
               Node nodeTbOpt = root.appendChild(docReq.createElement(TAG_TAX_CODE));
               for (int i = 0; i < pernr.length; i++) {
                    Node nodeTbOptItem = nodeTbOpt.appendChild(docReq.createElement("item"));
                    nodeTbOptItem.appendChild(docReq.createElement(TAG_TAX_CODE_P)).appendChild(docReq.createTextNode(TAX_CODE<i>));
          } catch (Exception e) {
               trace.addWarning("Error while building RFC Request - " + e);
          trace.addInfo("RFC Request XML: " + docReq.toString());
                                                //trace.addWarning("RFC Request XML: " + docReq.toString());
          // Lookup
          Payload load = null;
          try {
               Channel channel = LookupService.getChannel(receiver[0], CHANNEL_NAME);
               RfcAccessor accessor = LookupService.getRfcAccessor(channel);
               InputStream is = new ByteArrayInputStream(docReq.toString().getBytes());
               XmlPayload payload = LookupService.getXmlPayload(is);
               load = accessor.call(payload);
          } catch (LookupException e) {
               trace.addWarning("Error during lookup - " + e);
          // Parsing RFC Response Document
          Document docRsp = null;
          try {
               docRsp = builder.parse(load.getContent());
          } catch (Exception e) {
               trace.addWarning("Error when parsing RFC Response - " + e.getMessage());
          trace.addInfo("RFC Response XML: " + docRsp.toString());
                                                //trace.addWarning("RFC Response XML: " + docRsp.toString());
          try {
               NodeList res = docRsp.getElementsByTagName("item");
               for(int i=0;i<res.getLength();i++){
                    NodeList itemNodes = res.item(i).getChildNodes();
                    Map itemMap = new HashMap();
                    for(int j=0;j<itemNodes.getLength();j++){
                         itemMap.put(itemNodes.item(j).getNodeName(), itemNodes.item(j).getFirstChild().getNodeValue());
                    rows.add(itemMap);
                                                        catch (Exception e) {
               trace.addWarning("Result value not found in DOM - " + e);
               result.addValue("true");
Error:
16:24:08 Start of test
Source code has syntax error: /usr/sap/XD1/DVEBMGS30/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Map283041f0edf311dd960b0003bacd2461/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_INT012_INVOICE_DET_.java:598: 'class' or 'interface' expected public void TaxValues$(String[] a,String[] b,ResultList result,Container container){ ^ /usr/sap/XD1/DVEBMGS30/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Map283041f0edf311dd960b0003bacd2461/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_INT012_INVOICE_DET_.java:618: 'class' or 'interface' expected } ^ /usr/sap/XD1/DVEBMGS30/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Map283041f0edf311dd960b0003bacd2461/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_INT012_INVOICE_DET_.java:619: 'class' or 'interface' expected ^ 3 errors Source code has syntax error: /usr/sap/XD1/DVEBMGS30/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Map283041f0edf311dd960b0003bacd2461/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_INT012_INVOICE_DET_.java:598: 'class' or 'interface' expected public void TaxValues$(String[] a,String[] b,ResultList result,Container container){ ^ /usr/sap/XD1/DVEBMGS30/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Map283041f0edf311dd960b0003bacd2461/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_INT012_INVOICE_DET_.java:618: 'class' or 'interface' expected } ^ /usr/sap/XD1/DVEBMGS30/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Map283041f0edf311dd960b0003bacd2461/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_INT012_INVOICE_DET_.java:619: 'class' or 'interface' expected ^ 3 errors
16:24:11 End of test.

Hi Potharaju,
Why don't you try this, that really works:
If you are using PI 7.1:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/en/33/1ec6ced273493a993a80c2301c03da/frameset.htm
If you are using XI 3.0, PI 7.0
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a03e7b02-eea4-2910-089f-8214c6d1b439
Try with these.
Regards,
Juan

Posting multiple tax codes for single line order in MIRO

Hi all ,
I have received a request from my business colleagues to investigate the possibility of posting multiple tax codes against a single line order in MIRO.
This apparently can be a possibility for such things as training.
I have searched a number of forums and tried and tested different ways in my develoment client but am unable to find a solution. admittedly I am no real expert in this area and would be gratefu;lt of any ideas / assistance / etc..

HI, There is a possible solution for this scenario.
1. Create 2 tax codes for VAT and SERVICE Tax at 12.5% and 12.36% respectively
2. While posting the Invoice (TRX - FB60) following steps need to be followed.
3. Amount has to be split into two line items
4. Ist Line Item should have the Vat amount + 70000/- and select relevant tax code that was
    created for 12.5%
5. Similarly 2nd Line Item should have Service Tax amount + 30000/- and select relevant tax code that
    was created for 12.36%.
Hope this would meet your requirement. If the solution is okay, kindly indicate the points.
Regards
K.Sanjai Babu

Change Tax Code after Partial Delivery for Sales Order

Dear all,
The government in my country has changed the GST (Goods & Services Tax) in my country from 5% to 7%. In my system I have created a new 7% Tax Code and assigned it to Condition Type MWST with a new validity date.
For newly created Sales Order, my pricing procedure gets the correct 7% Tax Code for MWST based on Pricing Date that is later than the validity date I've set.
However, my problem lies with partially delivered/invoiced Sales Order when updating of prices are not allowed. One possibility I can think of is to allow Condition MWST to be maintained manually and change it during Billing process. But I'm looking for a solution without change the Configuration if possible.
Can anyone propose a good solution to my problem?
Thank you.
Regards,
Wen Ho

Hi
May be you can solve it this way without changing configuration.
Please take a look at item fields pricing date (sales a tab), service rendered (billing tab - special for taxes). Both fields influences prices and you can change them for instance if you want new tax to be considered you can put an updated date.
If it does not change prices goto Conditions tab and press the update button (option G copy prices and redetermine taxes could be the appropiatte).
As a suggestion please test carefully the scenario (taxes are involved) before making any change in Production documents).
I believe it will work fine. Please rewards points if usefull.
Best regards
Max

INVOIC01 change tax code

HI,
I want to change TAX code in INVOIC01 basic type in E1EDK04 segment. I use user exit EXIT_SAPLMRMH_012 in debug mode.
But change tax code is not refleted in IDOC segment.
Please help

Well,
Is this an inbound scenario or an outbound scenario, if it is outbound then use the exit - EXIT_SAPLVEDF_002.
If it is inbound, then the data will not be reflected in the new IDOC that is created while testing with WE19, you will have to look at the corresponding inbound document for that.
If the above info isn't of much help, provide as much info as you can about your scenario.
Regards,
Chen

Error " In case of evaluated receipt settlement, please maintain tax code", during VI01

Dear Team
We have a scenario in our environment where for a delivery made for STO Purchase Order, we are trying to post shipping cost document for Shipping document.
When we try to save the document, the system returns the error " In case of evaluated receipt settlement, please maintain tax code".
We have checked in the system. The vendor to whom the PO has been raised is not maintained for Evaluated Receipt Settlement, and as this is a STO , no vendor info record has been maintained for the same.
The issue has started to come for a new plant and transportation route, for other routes and plants we are still able to proceed successfully for creation of shipment costs
Can this be an issue of master data maintanence that we may have missed during plant creation or transportation route creation
Else, Kindly guide.

Hi Tarunveer,
Which Vendor are you mentioning: Plant Vendor of STO or Forwarding Agent.
I am suggesting to check in LFM2 for Forwarding Agent.
Same way, in the case of Invoice Tab in PO, (Which PO are you mentioning: STO or PO for Forwarding Agent?)
Regards,
MJ.

R12 - AP Invoice Lines Interface & Tax Codes

We have a slight problem getting AP Invoice Lines through the Payables Open Interface. In 11i the value held in the TAX_CODE column was validated (against AP_TAX_CODES I believe), and if wrong or missing the line was rejected. The eTRM for R12 claims this column is still validated, although against ZX_TAXES_B, however testing shows this to be untrue. Support documentation from Oracle (e.g. note 472649.1) suggest a number of other columns are now used for tax validation, however testing agains shows this to be untrue. The only column we can find which is validated is TAX_CLASSIFICATION_CODE, and if this column contains a valid tax code then the invoice line will be accepted, however we cannot find any documentation which shows that this column should be used.
Has anyone out there bottomed out this issue, and if so is there any insight you could offer?
Many thanks.
Edited by: user13317468 on Jul 4, 2011 1:32 AM

Hi Vinod,
please check the below reference from oracle support ...
Case Study: How Payables Open Interface Import works with EB Tax for importing Invoices [ID 1381400.1]
Regards,
Ivruksha

Different Tax codes in SRM PO and replicate ECC PO

Hello Experts,
Problem related to the TaX code in replicated PO .
We are in Extended classic scenario.
In SRM, when creating Shopping cart we enter manual tax code like e1(20%) or e2(25%) etc and when PO gets generated and replicated in the backend the tax code changes from E1 to V4.
Now in SRM PO the tax code is E1 and in backend replicated PO the tax code is v4.
I have checked the condition records in MEK3 t-code in ECC and found that condition record for same region is v4, i think because of this condition record the system is overwriting the tax code which is coming from SRM system.
Irrespective of any tax code which is coming from SRM PO , the ecc PO overwrites the V4 tac code for same region.
How i can overwrite that the SRM and ECC should have the same tax code as chosed in SRM at the time of creating a SC or a PO
Please help to accomplish
Thanks
Smriti
Edited by: Smriti arora on Jan 19, 2011 10:40 AM

Hello Experts,
I have posted a thread 3 days back, any help will be greatly appriciated.
Smriti
Edited by: Smriti arora on Jan 24, 2011 1:03 PM

How to configure Two Tax Codes for single line item in work order

Hi All,
Please do Review the below scenario and tell me how to solve it.
A) Certified Work Done Gross Bill Amt      100,000
Total Work Done Value      100,000
Less : Labour & Like Charges @ 30 % on Rs 100,000 = 30,000
Vat applicable Amount =      70,000
Add VAT @12.5% Chargeable on Taxable Turnover of Rs. 70,000.00     = 8750
Total Bill Value = 108750
Service Tax @ 12.36% on 33% Value of Rs. 100000     = 4079
G.Bill Amt = 112829
Total Amt Due for Payment = 112829

HI, There is a possible solution for this scenario.
1. Create 2 tax codes for VAT and SERVICE Tax at 12.5% and 12.36% respectively
2. While posting the Invoice (TRX - FB60) following steps need to be followed.
3. Amount has to be split into two line items
4. Ist Line Item should have the Vat amount + 70000/- and select relevant tax code that was
    created for 12.5%
5. Similarly 2nd Line Item should have Service Tax amount + 30000/- and select relevant tax code that
    was created for 12.36%.
Hope this would meet your requirement. If the solution is okay, kindly indicate the points.
Regards
K.Sanjai Babu

Error while sending PO (with tax code) from SSP to SUS via MM

Hello Experts
We are implementing Self Service Procurement and Supplier Self Services scenario.
We have created a SC with Tax Code say X in Self Service Procurement. The SC gets created as PO in R/3 (MM) system.
The IDoc which is getting created in the R/3 system has different segments than the one which gets created when we create the PO directly in R/3 system.
This IDoc which is seen in R/3 with the Status 26 - ' Error during syntax check of IDoc (outbound) '.
Please help, we are new to SSP.
Thanx and Regards
Gaurav
Edited by: Gaurav Giroti on Jan 29, 2009 1:36 PM
Edited by: Gaurav Giroti on Jan 29, 2009 1:37 PM

note 1311560 to be applied in ebp.

Unbalanced Transaction with Cenvat Tax Code

Hi All
I have a problem with A/R Down Payment Invoice.When i am trying to add the invoice with Cenvat related Tax code ( BED+VAT)the system is throwing an error which reads as follows:
" Unbalanced Transaction Message 131-91"
But when i am changing the tax code and selecting only Vat Code The A/R Downpayment Invoice is added succesfully.
Can anybody please throw some light on it what is the problem.
Can we use cenvat related Tax Code with A/R Downpayment Invoice or not..?
need your help
warm regards
anand

Hi Jeyakanthan
Thanks for the reply.Actually our client has a requirement.They do big projects of construction
as a result they receive payment in phases.The payment terms is like
1) 10% advance on receipt of order
2) Raise Invoice for 30% on approval of drawings + 100% taxes & Duties (Cenvat)+ freight
3) Raise Invoice for 40% after Initial inspection
4)Raise Invoice for 20% after final inspection.
Note: Payment terms differ with every order.
For this scenario i think A/R downpayment is ideal.Now when invoice is raised for 30% we are required to show 100% taxes and duties(Cenvat) in the A/R downpayment invoice.How to achieve this.
I have to make an invoice (Print layout report) where i have to show
Total Sales               100%
Claim Value                30% + 100% Taxex and Duties + freight
Retention Money         70% i.e Due from Customer
Your view on this would be of great help..Any alternate method to achieve this.
waiting for your reply.
warm regards
anand

Expense G/L Posting with Tax Code

Hi Expert,
I got an issue as per below:
1. User purchase a gift with below posting via F-43:
   Dr Expense/Material 100 [with Input Tax 6%]
     Dr Input Tax 6 [auto created line]
          Cr Vendor 106
2. Then there will be a posting to re-class the Expense/Material account to Gift Expense account via Manual Journal:
     Cr Expense/Material 100 [with Output Tax 6%]
     Cr Output tax adjustment 6 [expected auto created line]
          Dr Gift Expense 106 [with Zero Rated Tax]
The issue that I am having now is, during the second posting via Manual Journal the 'expected auto created line' is not populating.
Does anyone knows why is this happen?
Thank you in advance.
Regards,
Izzat

Hi All,
Thanks for your advice,
Really appreciate it.
I actually managed to solve this issue by creating a new tax code by using a reverse charge mechanism.
Where in the tax code I maintained the Output Tax with -6% and Non Deductible Input Tax 6%. I simulated the scenario and it gave me the result as per what I want.
Thank you.
Regards,
Izzat Ibrahim

Tax code - test scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for