Unbalanced Transaction with Cenvat Tax Code

Hi All
I have a problem with A/R Down Payment Invoice.When i am trying to add the invoice with Cenvat related Tax code ( BED+VAT)the system is throwing an error which reads as follows:
" Unbalanced Transaction Message 131-91"
But when i am changing the tax code and selecting only Vat Code The A/R Downpayment Invoice is added succesfully.
Can anybody please throw some light on it what is the problem.
Can we use cenvat related Tax Code with A/R Downpayment Invoice or not..?
need your help
warm regards
anand

Hi Jeyakanthan
Thanks for the reply.Actually our client has a requirement.They do big projects of construction
as a result they receive payment in phases.The payment terms is like
1) 10% advance on receipt of order
2) Raise Invoice for 30% on approval of drawings + 100% taxes & Duties (Cenvat)+ freight
3) Raise Invoice for 40% after Initial inspection
4)Raise Invoice for 20% after final inspection.
Note: Payment terms differ with every order.
For this scenario i think A/R downpayment is ideal.Now when invoice is raised for 30% we are required to show 100% taxes and duties(Cenvat) in the A/R downpayment invoice.How to achieve this.
I have to make an invoice (Print layout report) where i have to show
Total Sales               100%
Claim Value                30% + 100% Taxex and Duties + freight
Retention Money         70% i.e Due from Customer
Your view on this would be of great help..Any alternate method to achieve this.
waiting for your reply.
warm regards
anand

Similar Messages

Error: there are non exicisable item with cenvat tax code

I am getting an error message there are non exicisable item with cenvat tax code while trying to add po for pick and pack from sales order. I request all of you to help me with it.
I have already checked if the item and ware house is exicisable in the check box of the master data.
Best regards,
Sandesh.Sreyamsh

Thanks mahendra and rahul,
Unfortunately my issue is not solved yet, the tax is not manually created it was created by sap during new company creation. I checked by adding other tax type in sales order but every time when I try to create sales bom it gives the above error.
@ Rahul the tax is under cenvat type and the Items has been added under exercise transaction. here is what im trying to do
I created a sales order for 4 of my items.
Then i try to create po for two of my as pick and pack items by checking Purchase orders indicator under logistics tab of sales order.
At this point i am getting the above said error.
All the items i am trying to add is exisable and tax is also of cenvat type.
Please help me out of this as im stuch very badly in this issue.
Regards,
Sandesh.Sreyamsh

Error while posting A/R Downpayment Invoice with Excisable Tax Code.

While posting A/R Dowpayment Invoice with Excisable Tax Code error of "Unbalanced Transaction" appears. This error does not occur while posting A/R Downpayment Invoices with Non-Excisable Tax Codes.
Kindly provide a solution for the same.

SAP Note Number: 1179405
Error -5002 when trying to copy a document with Sales BOM
In order to create the delivery via the DI, you need to set the oDoc.Lines.BaseLine value to the LineNum value from the RDR1 table (in the above example you should enter the value 2).
we set oDoc.Lines.BaseLine=0 before starting the lines loop. This has resolved the issue.
This note was really helpful and it was found in another query.
You can also refer to this. https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=19070513&messageID=6178079
Thanks.
Edited by: Sadanand Manda on Nov 24, 2008 12:16 PM

T code fbl3n , adding output field is with hold tax code.

hai experts ,
tcode is fbl3n.
adding new field is with hold tax code in output fields..
inpu field is gl account number and company code and psting date.
but in report bsis table data is come, but this not properly assiging to output display structure.
but i find out some badis like   1. FI_ITEMS_MENUE01
                                               2. FI_ITEMS_MENUE02
                                                3. FI_ITEMS_CH_DATA
                                               4. BADI_LAYER
but these badis not working properly.
but i   develop some implimentation enhancement frame work , but inthis point , cursor will comes to enhancement block but not move step by step code..
please solve.
thanks in advance.

Hi,
To add new fields in the out put for the transaction FBL3N Use BTE.
Read the documentation first..
Go to Tcode FIBF =>Environment=>Info system(P/S)=>F8=>Select the event 00001650=>Click on documentation
1. Extend the structure RFPOSX and RFPOS with a new append structure.
2. Run the RFPOSXEXTEND report.
3. Create BTE 1650 (Business Transaction Event). For this purpose, copy the sample function module SAMPLE_INTERFACE_00001650 into the customer namespace.
4. Activate the module in transaction FIBF. Go to 'Settings -> Products -> ... of a customer' and create a product. You can choose the name of the product and the description. Set the 'Active' indicator and save.
5. Go to 'Settings -> P/S Modules -> ... of a customer' and include an entry for event 00001650 with your new product and function module. Save the entry.
Regards
DKS

Down load MWST records to with the tax code as before

Hi All,
I need to make some changes to the MWST tables in respect of a VAT rate increase in Spain due on 1st July.
I would like to know how to down load MWST records to with the tax code as before?
Aditya

Hi Aditya
You should create a new tax code for the new VAT rate; you should not change the rate for the existing code. This is because you may need to post/correct transaction for the old rate after the change in rates.
Data is stored in T683S. Select where KALSM = your tax procedure, for Spain this will most likely be TAXES

P.O. with different Tax codes for each line item.

Hi
I would like to know how the IV has been done for the P.O. with differnt tax codes for each line item. Since in MIRO at header level we can select only one tax code.

Hi
Raju,
It means we can post only one invoice at time i.e.for line item same taxcode is there.
e.g. If line item 10 has tax code A1, 20 has A2 then on header i can only select either A1 or A2 tax code & post invoice of that line item.

VK12 - disappered %? how to transport the table with new tax codes?

Hallo
I'm changing conditions for tax codes in VK12. I have 2 questions:
1. When I created new entries, the % sign disappears. What shoud I do with this?
2. Should I create a transport with this changes? Or should I create all new entries with new tax codes manually in all target systems?
Thanks for all help,
Megy

hi,
normally tax code changes will be done in PRD directly.
no need to transport
in VK12, that is change condtion record, you will find the details of condition record right.
then why are you going to create again.
change what ever you want to change then and there only and proceed with your requriment.
regards,
balajia

Acquisition tax in Belgium/Germany-Posting with different tax codes

Dear Friends,
Does anyone have experience working with Acquisition tax in Belgium and German where the goods and services purchased within EU have 21% -input and output tax such that it is ZERO. But still Tax authorities need to see both input and output tax amount with different tax code such as under:
Expense a/c Dr 100
Payable a/c Cr 100
Input VAT a/c Dr 21 - Tax code A1
Output VAT a/c Cr 21 - Tax code B1
Any help as to how to post the above entry and how to customize tax code to get the above result and any changes if required in country code tax calculation procedure will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Pinky

Hi Pinky,
When you define your tax codes, the system defaults certain tax types that have been defined in the system for specific countries. Input tax, output tax, and non-deductible input tax are examples of tax types used in Germany.
The system determines which tax types are to be displayed by means of the country key. A calculation procedure is specified for each country key, and this procedure contains the country-specific specifications for calculating and posting the different tax types.
When you define the calculation procedure, you must answer the following questions concerning each tax type:
What is the base amount for calculating the tax? This can be the expense or revenue amount or, as with sales equalization tax in Belgium, a tax amount.
Which calculation type is used to determine the base amount: percentage included or percentage separate? With very few exceptions (such as for travel expense accounting in Germany), the base amount is normally determined percentage included.
The tax amount is 15%.
Percentage included
Tax amount = invoice gross amount * (tax rate/100 + tax rate)
150 = 1150 * ( 15 / 100 + 15)
Percentage separate
Tax amount = invoice net gross * tax rate/100
150 = 1000 * 15 / 100
To which side of the account must the tax amount be posted? The input and output tax is always posted in accordance with the G/L account and asset line items. For the tax to be posted additionally, the side of the account is determined depending on the input or output tax. For the acquisition and investment tax, for example, you post to the opposite side of the account.
Should a possible tax expense be divided between the G/L account and asset line items or posted separately? If, for example, you have a non-deductible input tax amount, you can choose whether to post to a separate expense account or apportion the tax expense between the G/L account and asset line items.
The type of tax calculation and posting depends on the answers to these questions and the combination of those answers.
The following topics introduce individual tax types and explain the necessary specifications for calculating and posting tax. For more information on the calculation procedure, see The Calculation Procedure.
See also:
Tax on Sales/Purchases: Input and Output Tax
Non-Deductible Input Tax
Deferred Tax: Italy
Sales Tax
Use Tax
Tax Calculation With or Without Jurisdiction Code?
Entering Taxes with Jurisdiction Code
Acquisition Tax
Investment Tax
Sales Equalization Tax
I hope this link will help you
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/e5/077e394acd11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Regards
Odaiah

Issue with document created with a tax code related to a different Company Code

Hello,
we need to clear a document created with the tax code "YY" which is associated to the Company Code Espana even if the vendor of this document belongs to the Country Portugal.
When we try to clear this documents we get the follow error:
Tax code YY for Country Portugal has been deleted or incorrectly changed
The problem is the tax code exists but it is associated to Company Code Espana and not to the Portugal one
In order to cleare this document should we activate the tax code for Portugal, as well?
Thank You

Hello, Are you trying to post entry having Plant in Portugal? Thanks, Deepanshu

Restriction of some with holding tax code when doing F-43

Dear All,
       How can i restrict previous fiscal year's with holding tax codes while creating a vendor invoice (i.e F-43).
      Its an urgent requirement, i would really appreciate if some one gives the input.
Thanks
Suresh

Dear Rob,
          yeah i know that, but unfortunately i cannot write the validation because the pre-requisite condition requires an entry from WITH_ITEM table, which is not there in the list of structures and tables while writing the validation.
         Please provide the alternate or else let me know how to include the WITH_ITEM table in the list of structures & tables.
Thanks
Ravi

Unable to select multiple with holding tax codes. -"This entry already exists in the following tables '' (ACPR) (ODBC -2035) [Message 131-183]"

Unable to select multiple with holding tax codes.
This entry already exists in the following tables '' (ACPR) (ODBC -2035) [Message 131-183]

Hi,
Actually this is an application error in 2007 A and there is no version/PL to fix this issue.
Refer SAP note 1260874 - Cannot add a new BP with ITW tax code
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

Aggregated bill with multiple tax code

Hi experts! I need information about aggregated bill with multiple tax code. Do you know something about or do you have some documentation? Regards Luke

Luke,
Taxes and additional account assignments are posted in the same way as standard postings at individual customer level in aggregated posting, when you create the aggregated bill.
Thanks,
Sai

Error in PO Creation with Excise Tax Code

Dear
I am getting the following error while creating a PO (in sandbox) in MM.
No posting rules exist for account key
Message no. FF714
Diagnosis
No posting rules have been defined for the account key in the tax table in table T007B.
Procedure
Change the tax table, enter an account key already defined for the transaction in question or define the posting rules for a new account key in table T007B.
In sand box, I am making use of VS1(Condition Type JMOP)(10%), VS2(Condition Type JAOP)(2%), VS3(Condition Type JSOP)(1%) & JP5 Condition Type JVRD)(4%)Account keys with deductible nature in one tax code V8. In OB40 GLs are defined. Posting keys 40 & 50 are given. In GL master all tax types allowed * is also given. Also excise data is maintained in the vendor master.
I am not getting the above error if I make use of any other tax code with only one percentage and one condition type. I am getting the above error if make use of the above tax code V8 which is created for excise.
Inputs are hightly solicited.
Regds

Check this thread
[No posting rules exist for account key|No posting rules exist for account key]
Alternatively, check the following notes which may help you
=> Note 27350 - Missing account key
=> Note 32828 - Termination with FF714 when posting with FB01
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Self billing invoice with input tax code

Hello experts,
we are currently trying to implement a billing procedure with credit memos within the module SD. In this set-up the recipient of a service (company using the SAP) creates a credit memo for the renderer of a service (a debitor in SAP) showing the amount the recipient of the service/product has to pay. The credit memo will also show VAT (we currently only try to implement a process for transaction within Germany, no cross-border transactions yet). For the recipient of the service (= issuer of the credit memo) the credit memo is similar to an incoming invoice (self billing invoice). Hence, the shown VAT on this credit memo - if all other requirements are met - can be treated as deductible input tax.
In order to automatically process the credit memo correctly as incoming invoice it has to be linked to a tax code (Steuerkennzeichen) with tax type "V" (=input tax) (Vorsteuerkennzeichen). To achieve that we have created a new condition record (Konditionssatz) that performs that task.
So currently we create a credit memo request (Gutschriftsanforderung) which is linked to an input tax code (Vorsteuerkennzeichen) via mentioned condition record. We then create the billing document. During creating the billing document an accounting document should also be created. But that is where our approach does not work properly. The system creates a billing document (credit memo) but does not create the corresponding accounting document. We receive the error message:
Document .... saved (no accounting document generated)
Message no. VF050
When trying to release the document to FI via Transaction VF02 we receive the following, more detailed error message:
Only output tax is allowed for account 480000 1000, VZ is not allowed
Message no. FS215
This problem has to be somehow linked to the usage of an input tax code. If we perform the same procedure with an output tax code (Ausgangsteuerkennzeichen) we will not receive the error message and an accounting document is created.
It seems that the account determination is responsible for the described problem: Although an input tax code is assigned, the account key (as shown in the overview to the applied conditions on the items within the credit memo request (Item - Condition - Detail)) does not change from "MWS" to "VST" and therefore an output tax account (Account Number 480000) is determined for the tax amount. And for that output tax account the usage of an input tax code is not allowed.
Has anyone an idea how to solve the described problem or how to implement the billing procedure another way?
We are aware that there is such a functionality within the module MM called "Evaluated Receipt Settlement (ERS)" but this is not suitable for our purposes since we want to implement this within SD and without the need to create an order first which seems to be necessary for ERS.
Thanks for your help,
Bernd

Hi
Please check in FS00, of that G/L account in control data tab what is the Tax Category that has been maintained.Check wheather input tax/output tax has been maintaind or not
In FS00 in the control tab check the box Posting without tax allowed
Regards
Srinath
Edited by: sri nath on Sep 30, 2011 4:55 PM

With holding Tax Code

Dear All,
I have assigned a withholding tax code to customer In VK11.
Now when i am saving the invoice no accounting document
is getting generated and I am getting the following error.
Balance in transaction currency
     Message no. F5702
Diagnosis
     A balance has occurred in transaction currency 'INR' with the following
     details:
     Exchange rate '00', amount '             1.13' and currency key 'INR'.
     The data in the transaction currency were transferred from the calling
     application.
System Response
     Your data cannot be processed in FI.
Procedure
      The error is probably in the calling application.
Please help me in solving the issue.
Regards
Deepak Joshi

Hello,
withholding taxes can be handled in SD side only as explained in note 178824.
Best regards,
Ivano.

Unbalanced Transaction with Cenvat Tax Code

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for