Tax column issue

Hi Friends,
I have scenario here.I have done free goods configuration with exclusive.I am facing a problem in the free goods line item where tax column has to show "ZERO" but system is calculating Tax region and for main item it is calculating correct value.I want to get zero value in my tax column.Can you people suggest me how to do the process.
with Regards,
A.Sudhakar

hi
you maintain item level tax calcification , at item level billing tab not for header level , when you maintain the free goods item , this is applicable for only free goods not for main item
like you maintain zero tax calcification , condition records for VAT
AT vk11 , Here based on key combination records and put material tax calcification as ZERO , and value also 0 , then you will try

Similar Messages

Replacement of Tax Columns in R12 Environment (12.1.3)

After Upgrade from 11.5.10 to R12.1.3 these following columns were picked in AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL table and now the issue is about to replace these tax columns with R12 ZX tables.
Table used in 11i AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL
TAX_RECOVERY_RATE,
TAX_RECOVERY_OVERRIDE_FLAG
Have to replace columns with ZX tax tables... Need to know which table is populating in ZX tables.. Please suggest on this as it is very high important....
Appreciate your help!
Thanks,
Anwar.

Pl do not post duplicate threads - Replacement of Tax Columns in R12 Environment (12.1.3)
Srini

Replacement of Tax Columns from AP Tables to ZX Tables

Explanation of Queries :
11i Query:
select DIST_MATCH_TYPE, LINE_TYPE_LOOKUP_CODE, AMOUNT_INCLUDES_TAX_FLAG, DISTRIBUTION_LINE_NUMBER, LINE_GROUP_NUMBER,
TAX_CODE_OVERRIDE_FLAG,
TAX_RECOVERY_OVERRIDE_FLAG,
TAX_RECOVERY_RATE,
VAT_CODE
from AP_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTIONS_ALL where INVOICE_ID=2803856 -- This Query is fine in 11i Version and no modification is needed. All I need to modify the below R12 Query.
R12 Query:
select
aid.DIST_MATCH_TYPE, ail.LINE_TYPE_LOOKUP_CODE, zls.TAX_AMT_INCLUDED_FLAG AMOUNT_INCLUDES_TAX_FLAG,
nvl(aid.OLD_DIST_LINE_NUMBER,aid.DISTRIBUTION_LINE_NUMBER) DISTRIBUTION_LINE_NUMBER,
zls.OVERRIDDEN_FLAG TAX_CODE_OVERRIDE_FLAG,
aid.TAX_RECOVERY_OVERRIDE_FLAG, --Need to get the mapping column in R12 from ZX Tables
aid.TAX_RECOVERY_RATE, --Need to get the mapping column from in R12 from ZX Tables
ail.TAX_CLASSIFICATION_CODE vat_code
from
ap_invoices_all ai,
ap_invoice_lines_all ail,
ap_invoice_distributions_all aid,
ZX_LINES_SUMMARY zls
where ai.invoice_id=ail.invoice_id
and ail.invoice_id=aid.invoice_id
and ail.line_number=aid.invoice_line_number
and ai.invoice_id=zls.TRX_ID
and aid.DISTRIBUTION_LINE_NUMBER=zls.SUMMARY_TAX_LINE_NUMBER
and ai.invoice_id=2803856
order by ail.line_number;
Please suggest me on the columns to be replaced and help me out. Appreciate your help....
Regards,
Mohammed Manzur

Pl do not post duplicate threads - Replacement of Tax Columns in R12 Environment (12.1.3)
Srini

Tax column at line item level in VA01/VA02

Hello All,
I had a requirement to add the tax column at line item level for va01/VA02 transaction.
I modified the screen 4900 and added the VBAP-TAXM1 column to the item table control and made that column input enabled.
Now I had to calculate the TAX conditions based on the input in that tax column. None of the user exit is triggering when I change the values in this field, do I need to make any changes in the PAI of the 4900 screen in order to make the userexits trigger or am I missing anything?
Thanks & Regards,
SasiKiran.

Hi
Please, see SAP Note 862228 - Order reason for returns on item level. It is related with field AUGRU. Remember that it is a modification. I suggest you to add in addition data (for instance, SAP Note 209278 - Display of customer-specific fields in sales doc, SAP Note 302497 - Additional cust. fields not displayed in 'Additional data B', SAP Note 420546 - Additional data B and transaction variants in sales order and related notes).
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo

Calculation of Tax Issue from FB60 (Tax Code Issue)

Dear All,
Normally when we purchase or received any services we post following entry.
INVOICE VALUE IS 1000
Purchase Ac Dr   1000
   To Vendor                   900
   T o Tax                         100
But our requirement is that
Purchase Ac Dr   1100
   To Vendor                  1000
   T o Tax                          100
System should add cost of TAX in purchase instead of reduction form vendor balance as we have to give 1000 RS to vendor.
Can we create TAX code in this manner.
This is not even possible form function available in Edit Option in FB60 (Calculate tax on Net Amount)
Not even from TDS (Withholding tax)
WE CANu2019T SUGGEST POSTING JV IN THAT CASE.
Regards,
Bittu

Apologized for that Atif.
Withholding Tax Type does not control Vendor line item.
My issue is that system should not reduce value enter in vendor amount field.
System usually reduce amount which is payable to vendor
Please see my example once again. I also mention that it is not working from Withholding Tax nor form Tax code(FTXP)
Edit option in FB60 is also not useful in this case.
Regards,

Need help in Payroll Tax Balance Issue - Urgent

Hi,
Please help me with the following Tax and Balance issue. The system is on 12.0.3, South African Legislation.
Issue : Salary has been restructured from Basic Salary to Total package structure in Dec 2008. Retro Pay was used to pay the difference amounts in Dec Run. But while configuring the new Elements for this Total Package they have missed out adding the Retro Elements to Proper Tax calculating Balances.
Eg : "TP Salary" element is fed to "Taxable Income RFI" balance but "TP Retro Salary" element is not fed to this balance.
So tax has not been calculated for those Retro amounts. This has been identified while validating test run for IRP5 tax certificates.
The Feb 09 (Feb is the Tax year End for payroll) Payroll was already run on 10th and payments were already done. Now we need to tax the retro amounts and retrieve the balance tax amounts from Employees.
I added the proper tax balances to those Retro elements and and the balances were adjusted to add the Retro amounts. Then I ran the Feb run the payroll again as of 20th, it did not recalculate the tax.
How to recalculate the tax so that correct tax reflects in the Tax certificates? Please help me with the necessary Info.
Thanks,
Sri.

Hi,
As I mentioned earlier, I added the appropriate balances which are used to calculate Tax to Retro Elements and those Balances got updated with the delta amount but Tax was not updated. I want to know is there any process provided by Oracle using which Tax for those already paid amounts can be recalculated.
I calculated the Tax manually and using Adjust Balance form added ZA_TAX_BALANCE_ADJUSTMENT Element and given the difference tax amount in PAYE and Tax Input values and saved the form. The Tax got updated.
Tax_ASG_RUN - 15000
Tax_ASG_TAX_YTD - 153257.32 (Prev - 138257.32). When I run the IRP5 (Tax Certificate Process) the tax is also getting correctly on it.
But client wants Oracle to calculate the Tax for those retro amounts so thats the challenge.
Could you help me with this.
Thanks,
Sri

Income Tax Calculations - Issue

Client is saying that as per their existing SAP system, the Income tax calculation is made on Gross salary. And they are saying that if any additional taxable payout is made in a month to an employee, then the total tax on this additional payout should be paid by the employee in the same month. So basically his total tax would be the (general regular monthly tax + total tax on the additional payment), which as per them the system is not calculating correctly since October 2010.

Hi,
Thanks for your reply Jurgen & Remi. I am pretty new to Payroll & this is India Payroll.
Now, the issue is how should I proceed ahead.
1. The client says that the wage types are already configured in the system in such way that on certain wage types, the tax which is calculated is paid in the same month. Can u pls inform that which processing class & cumulation class do I need to check in Table 512w_d for this wage type.
2. As I need to see this whole functioning in Schema, pls guide as to where I should check this whole tax calculation in Schema.
3. The function I have heard which is used is India for Income tax is INTAX.
Looking forward to your reply.
Thanks a lot!!!
Edited by: SAP ST on Nov 25, 2010 7:24 PM

Format on multiple columns issue ...

Post Author: needhelptoo
CA Forum: Formula
I'm having issues with the way the data is displaying.I am using the Format Multiple Columns.I have 3 across set.I have the Down and Across checked.My report with the 3 columns is a custom labels sheet.I need to have the down part always be 8 columns.i can't set that anywhere like the 3 columns across.as the sheet used to print the info are labels and perforated for each label (column)I have the following:1.
Group Header #1 on InvoiceNumber. This have my invoice header
information related to the customer of the invoice. Keep Together
selected.2. Group Header #2 on a formula {@sort}. This is suppressed and as a {@reset} formula in it.3. Details section has {@accum} and section suppressed. Keep Together selected.4. Group Footer #2 as the {@display} formula with Paragraph Formatting. Keep Together selected.5. Group Footer #1 on InvoiceNumber has add'l customer related info for the invoice.so 5 sections in my design view with 2 groups.It'll display the information in InvoiceNumber order in ascending order down first.But the last one on the 1st column is only part of the invoice info and the rest of it starts from the top of the 2nd column.and
then shifts all the columns according to that. Which of course then
does not print on the allotted space of the actual label. part of info
is on one and the rest on another.obviously this won't work. I think i tried everything I can think of and I'm not expert. Barely a novice at this.any help would be appreciated!

Post Author: V361
CA Forum: Formula
In the layout tab, have you tried the Gap between details ?, you should be able to produce a "mailing label type" report using detail size and gap between details...

XML Publisher - Dynamic Data Columns Issue

Hi,
I am creating a amortization report where I need to show the amortization schedule for unearned revenue. Customers have signed different years of contract and I need to show the amount as per their remaining contract months. So if there are 2 month remaining in the contract then I should show the data for 2 months only and if there are 10 months then I should display 10 months. If we run the report for both customers then it should display two lines in report. For first customer the data should be only for 2 months and for second row(customer) there should be data for next 10 months. These months should be columns in the report(like excel columns, not rows). I need to display all months in columns instead of rows.
I have acheived that using Dynamic Data Columns as mentioned in the user guide. Everything is working fine except following issues -
1. How to create page level total?_
I have created page total in my template using <?add-page-total:TOTUREV;'UREV'?> and displaying using <?show-page-total:TOTUREV?> but when I run the report in excel format these page total do not display. These columns are static columns not dynamic.
If I run the report in pdf format then the static column total is displayed correctly.
2. When I run the report in excel format then report run fine and it shows all the columns properly but if I run the report in pdf format then the dynamic column are not displayed in their own columns, all the columns are overwriting each other in a single columns itself, its not expanding.
3. How do I get the total for the dynamic columns?_
I need to display the page level total for the dynamic columns also, how do I do that?
4. When I run the report in excel format the 2 decimal places of the numbers are gone(it works fine in pdf output), like 12.50 becomes 12.5 and 14.00 becomes 14. I need to maintain those 2 decimal places. I have tried using <fo:bidi-override direction="ltr" unicode-bidi="bidi-override"><?format-number:CVALUE;'999999D99'?></fo:bidi-override> but this does not solve my problem completely. It shows the values correctly in excel but then I am not able to do any calculation on those columns, looks like it converts them to text values.
Any help is really appreicated. Please let me know if you need the xml template and data file.
Regards
Hitesh

Hi Hitesh,
Can you please upload your RTF and XML template file? I will try to spend sometime on this issue.
Cheers
Sachin

Edit column issue in Premiere Elements 9

Is there an issue with the Edit Column feature in the project window of Premiere Elements 9?
When I add a Description or Comment column, changes are not saved when I close and reopen the program.
Also, I cannot write any text in these columns to describe my videos (if I click on the space for writing comments, it just opens up a window to view the video) whereas I was able to do it with version 4 and earlier.
I am using the trial version before buying and would like to know if the purchased version has this problem or not and if it can be fixed?

I could be mis-remembering, but I think that Steve Grisetti has confirmed about what you indicate. I do not know if this was some sort of change in Adobe's thinking, and they did not clean up after themselves, or if this is just a Bug, that needs to be addressed.
Personally, I would file a Bug Report, with the full details, and hope to get a fix in the works.
Also, if I am mis-remembering, I am sure that Steve G. will correct me.
Good luck,
Hunt

Invoice not released to accounting: tax code issue

Hi All,
Iam getting an error while i released my invoice to accounting. No accounting document generated. the error is " Tax code V0 does not appear in any G/L account item Message no. FF753"
we have various condition types in our invoices. Only TAX condition type ZWST has tax code V0. rest of the condition types like basic price, cash dicsount, rebate condition etc do not have tax code assigned to them which is right since only tax conditions have tax code assigned to them and which is ZWST only.
My question is why the above error comes " Tax code V0 does not appear in any G/L account item Message no. FF753" . if I double click on the error message, system shows me the following
""""""""""""""""tax code V0 does not appear in any G/L account item
Message no. FF753
Diagnosis
The document entered contains a customer or vendor item with tax code V0. This does not occur in any of the G/L account or asset items.
Consequences:
If you have not entered the cash discount base manually, the system will set it to zero in this item.
If this item was paid with cash discount deduction and the cash discount amount contains a tax portion, the tax code entered is used for the backdated tax calculation. An automatic breakdown does not take place on the basis of the offsetting items.
Procedure
Check whether the tax code was set correctly. If necessary, correct it or enter "**".
There are, however, also situations in which it makes sense to enter a tax code manually which differs from the offsetting items, for example, during data acquisition.
Effects on Customizing
You can define when this system message is to be issued in accordance with your requirements.
In Customizing, choose Cross-Application Components -> Bank Directory -> Change Message Control.
The application area and message number can be taken from the technical documentation """""""""""""
I do not know what system is saying.Could anybody help.
regards
sachin

Hi Sonu,
Please refer SAP Note 112609.
Thanks & Regards,
Santosh

Dynamic ordering ambiguous column issue

I'm working on a stored procedure that will accept a column name from a web application. The stored procedure will use the @SortColumn to sort the results of the query. I'm receiving ambiguous column errors when the column values are passed in
to the query. The original query is written using dynamic sql but I created a simple query to reproduce the issue.   Can someone review the sample below and let me know if there is a way to resolve the error.
In the example below, the Over(Order by Emp_ID) section is causing the error. The order by is expecting e.Emp_ID as the order by value.  Is there anyway for me to rewrite the logic to allow the correct column alias to be using in the order by statement?
Ultimately, I would like to pass in a paramter for the order by column. Ex.   Over(Order by ' + @SortColunm + '
SELECT RowNum
,Emp_ID
,First_Name
,Last_Name
From (Select Distinct ROW_NUMBER() OVER(Order by Emp_ID) as RowNum,
e.Emp_ID as Emp_ID
,e.First_Name as First_Name
,e.Last_Name as Last_Name
FROM Employee e
LEFT OUTER JOIN Team t ON e.team_id = t.team_Id AND e.Emp_id = t.Emp_Id
LEFT OUTER JOIN AccrualType at ON e.Accrual_Type = at.Type
LEFT OUTER JOIN ClosingProcess cp ON e.Emp_id = cp.Emp_ID
where Last_Name like 's%'
) As Employees
order by Emp_ID

I've updated my query to use a cte and also included the Row_Number logic. I'm now receiving "Invalid column name 'RowNum". Can anyone explain what I'm doing wrong in the code below?   I'm trying to create a stored procedure
that accepts a parameter to handle paging and sorting. The dynamic sql is needed for the SortExpression.
declare @SortExpression varchar(50) = 'Last_Name';
declare @DynSql varchar(max)='';
declare @Emp_ID NVARCHAR(50) = NULL
declare @First_Name VARCHAR(50) = NULL
declare @Last_Name VARCHAR(50) = 's'
declare @StartIndex INT
declare @MaximumRows INT
set @DynSql=
With Employees as
( Select Distinct
e.Emp_ID as Emp_ID
,First_Name
,Last_Name
FROM Employee e
LEFT OUTER JOIN Team t ON e.team_id = t.team_Id AND e.Emp_id = t.Emp_Id
LEFT OUTER JOIN AccrualType at ON e.Accrual_Type = at.Type
LEFT OUTER JOIN ClosingProcess cp ON e.Emp_id = cp.Emp_ID
SELECT ROW_NUMBER() Over (Order By ' + @SortExpression + ') As RowNum,
Emp_ID
,First_Name
,Last_Name
FROM Employees
WHERE RowNum BETWEEN ' + CAST(@StartIndex as varchar(10)) + ' AND ' + '(' + CAST(@StartIndex as varchar(10))+ CAST(@MaximumRows as varchar(10))+ ') - 1 '
If @Emp_ID is not null
Set @DynSql = @DynSql + ' And (Emp_ID = @Emp_ID)'
If @First_Name is not null
Set @DynSql = @DynSql + ' And (First_Name = @First_Name)'
If @Last_Name is not null
Set @DynSql = @DynSql + ' And (Last_Name = @Last_Name)'
exec (@DynSql)

Tax columns to be populated in ra_interface_lines_all table in Inbound Interface???

Hi All,
We are upgrading EBS from 11i instance to R 12.1.3. There is inbound interface for Recevibles transactions which fetches data from a data file and imports invoices after validation.
In 11i, tax_code column in ra_interface_lines_all was populated to import the tax details. But, in R12 tax_code column is not used. Can anyone tell me which columns we need to populate in ra_interface_lines_all table for tax details, i can see there are many tax related columns. I am deriving tax details from zx_rates_b table.
Which column should be used from this table as a input in tax_code(or other column) in ra_interface_lines_all.??
Thanks
Swapnil K.

Hi Swapnil,
For Tax, value to be taken from ZX_TAXES_B.TAX
For TAX_STATUS_CODE, value to be taken from ZX_STATUS_B.TAX_STATUS_CODE
For TAX_RATE_CODE, value to be taken from ZX_RATES_B. TAX_RATE_CODE
For further details on the mapping refer to the oracle documentation from below reference ...
Description and Usage of Fields in RA_INTERFACE_LINES Table (Doc ID 1195997.1)
Regards,
Ivruksha

Index on multiple columns issue Oracle 9i

Hi,
I have a couple of issues and would appreciate it if anyone can help:
a). I have a table that has indexes on multiple columns, so for example:
Index 1 on Org_Type, Org_Id and Effdt
Index 2 on FICE_CD, Org_Id and Effdt etc.
I have 9 such indexes and all of them hav Effdt in it.
My question is if I query the table and always use a subquery to get the max Effdt rows form the table, will the above indexes help in my query or will I have to create another index just on Effdt so that my Query runs faster.
b). I have a target table with more than 20 million rows in it. This table has an Effdt too and I would like to find the max effdted row in this table as well so that I can then use that date-time stamp in my ETL tool to do an incremental update from my source table each night. But since the amount of rows is huge, my query runs forever. I have a normal non-unique index on Effdt. Is there another way I can optimize this table? Currenlty I have resorted to getting all rows from source that are >= (sysdate -1), but I would prefer to get the max date-time stamp from the target table itself.
Thanks,
CJ

Hi ,
Thanks for the input. I just used the explain plan and found that there is a full table scan happening on the PS_EXT_ORG_TBL, so I guess I will have to create an index specifically on the effdt field. The sql is as follows:
Select E.EMPLID, E.INSTITUTION, E.EXT_ORG_ID, E.EXT_CAREER, E.EXT_DATA_NBR, E.EXT_SUMM_TYPE, E.UNT_ATMP_TOTAL, E.UNT_COMP_TOTAL,
E.CLASS_RANK, E.CLASS_SIZE, E.PERCENTILE, E.UM_GPA_EXCLUDE, E.UM_EXT_ORG_GPA, E.CONVERT_GPA,
E.UM_EXT_ORG_CNV_CR, E.UM_EXT_ORG_CNV_GPA, E.UM_EXT_ORG_CNV_QP, E.UM_GPA_OVERRIDE, E.EXT_ACAD_LEVEL,
F.FROM_DT, F.TO_DT, G.EXT_DEGREE_NBR, G.DEGREE, G.DESCR "DEGREE DESCR", G.DEGREE_DT, H.EFFDT,
H.EFF_STATUS, H.SCHOOL_CODE, H.LS_SCHOOL_TYPE, H.ATP_CD, H.CITY, H.STATE, H.COUNTRY,
H.DESCR "SCHOOL DESCR", H.PROPRIETORSHIP
FROM PS_EXT_ACAD_SUM E, PS_EXT_ACAD_DATA F, PS_EXT_DEGREE G, PS_EXT_ORG_TBL H
WHERE E.EXT_ORG_ID = F.EXT_ORG_ID AND E.EMPLID = F.EMPLID
AND E.EXT_ORG_ID = G.EXT_ORG_ID AND E.EMPLID = G.EMPLID
AND E.EXT_ORG_ID = H.EXT_ORG_ID
AND H.EFFDT=(SELECT MAX(EFFDT) FROM PS_EXT_ORG_TBL H1
          WHERE H.EXT_ORG_ID=H1.EXT_ORG_ID
                    AND H.EFF_STATUS=H1.EFF_STATUS
                    AND H.SCHOOL_CODE=H1.SCHOOL_CODE
                    AND H.LS_SCHOOL_TYPE=H1.LS_SCHOOL_TYPE
                    AND H.ATP_CD=H1.ATP_CD
                    AND H.CITY=H1.CITY
                    AND H.STATE=H1.STATE )
My source DB is a copy of the transactional database, so there is no danger of new rows coming in.

Non Dedutable tax code issue

Hi Gurus,
I have one issue, User Created PO with non dedutable tax code and Did GR and while doing IR
Invoice Account Details
Posting        Accounting        G/L Code             Act/ mat/Ven             Amount
1                   K                        220000               Vendor code               5050.02-
2                   S                        230000                GR/IR Clearing Acc     4449.39
3                   M                        110950               Material code               600.66
Issue is tax amount is 600.66, Why it is posting Accounting Key M as this is non dedutable tax code, so as per my understanding
System shoud post 600.66 to GR/IR clearing account, so why it is posting to M.
Please suggest where it is went wrong?
Anil

hi,
as in your case you are not availing the cenvat credit, instead you are loading the same on the inventory as you could not avail it.hence the system has loaded the cenvat credit on the material that why you are getting sepearte line item in the accounting doc.
in the tax procedure you would have assign NVV accounting key against the condition type. you define the details of NVV in OBCN trx where you would have mentioned as seperate line item(2) against the posting indicator. if you have maintained (3) against the posting indicator then it would distribute the expense /revenue item.i.e nothing but your GR/IR account
Regards,
velu

Tax column issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for