Tax deductions with tax directive

I am running a South African payroll (4.6c)and need to know the following.
1. How are other sites handling Retrenchments
2 we are using normal tax deductions via the tax tables but on retrenchments we would like to capture a directive for the tax on infotype 0149. Keep in mind the tax directive will be received after the last payroll
3. then we have a unique situation as follows....it could be 4 months after leaving that an employee is entitled to a bonus which needs to be run via a payroll
4. so in a nutshell an employee pays normal tax, then gets retrenched and needs tax deducted from a tax directive, then gets a bonus where normal table tax needs to be deducted.
This is rather urgent as we need to pay out the retrenchments within 3 weeks
Thanks in advance

Hi,
1.check whether the TDS tax type and tax codes are attached to theparticular vendor master and liable (check box) is tricked or not.
2. check the vendor code .......field status of the account group of the vendor belongs to.....are optional or not.
3.check the field status group of the GLs to be posted and also the reconciliation GL account whether the withholding tax field is optional or not.
If the withholding tax field are not optional make the field optional for the 3 cases above written.
Hope the problem will be solved.
With regards,
Sudipto

Similar Messages

List of tax code with tax rate

I need a list that give the tax code with the tax rate.
I can view this in SAP or witch table i look this.
Moderator: please do not log issues twice and crosspost into different (and wrong) forums. Thread relocated to ERP Financials and locked.

hi
>i wanna see the list of the tax code defined for the Service PO in its "invoice" tab.like for service tax we have three tax :
check T code FTXP
> tax code displayed to which the calculations are applied
check t code OBYZ
regards
kunal

Account Determination for Tax using Sale Tax Code

Hi,
We are using TAXINN and sales tax codes. We are using JTX1 condition in our sales pricing procedure for which we r maintaing condition record with correct tax code applied to it. We have assigned account keys in Tax Procedure, so no acct. key is assigned to JTX1 in sales pricing procedure. In record of JTX1 we are maintaining same tax rate (with tax code assigned to it) for eg. 4 % (not 100%) as maintained in tax code.
Now, we are able to save billing document but while creating accounting document system is giving following error:
No account is spesified in item 0000001002
No acct. was specified for acct. type S in item 1002 of the FICO doc.
The financial acctg. pgm. cannot process the doc.
A sys. error has probably occured in ther sppln. you called up. Check the data transferred to item 1002 of the FICO doc.
Pls. help.
Regards,
Dipti

Hi Dipti,
Hope you are working for Indian Client.
Since you are using TAXINN procedure, you should not use JTX1(Tax Jurisdict.Code) condition at all. As you are aware after implementation of VAT, we should switch off Tax Jurisdiction at all lelvels.
SD Pricing Procedure:
1. Condition Type Settings
a. Excise conditions (if req'd)
b. LST / CST Conditions
c. Freight and Insurance Conditions
2. Access Sequence Settings
3. Maintain Pricing Procedure
4. Assign tax code to Company code
Therefore, check your IMG settings once again.
Bye,
Muralidhara

Tax issue with Direct Input mode of RFBIBL00

Hi, I have a problem using RFBIBL00 (direct input mode) to create A/R invoices. There is no tax associated with the invoice, however, when I use direct input mode, instead of posting immediately, a batch input session is created. In the log, an information message: 'Specify a tax jurisdiction key'. The BDC session is processed with no error.
When using Call transaction mode for RFBIBL00, the document is posted immediately but the requirement is to use Direct input mode.
There is no converted data in the BBTAX structure since the doc. does not need to post to tax account. Do I need to populate the Tax amount, Tax code and jurisdiction code in this structure and BBSEG in order to by pass the information message?
Any advice is appreciated.
- Minami

Problem solved. Just need to untie the relationship between the ITEM import structure and the BBTAX so the Direct Input program will not require a tax jurisdiction code.

Query Regarding With holding tax deducted

Hi,
Hi,
I am facing one problem with With Holding Tax deduction.
Let us explaining with example:
1) Ist I passed one entry through T.Code: f-48 then deducted some TDS (Rs. 5000/- down payment).
2) IInd I passed one invoice T.Code: f-43 then deducted TDS (Invoice amount Rs. 10000/- but tds base amount entered Rs. 5000/-).
Here above I passed two entries and deducted total amount of TDS.
3) While at the time of balance amount payment T.Code: F-53 again system will deduct TDS.
I am facing problem here. Why system is again deduct TDS at the time of balance payment. Already balance amount of TDS duducted at time of Invoice.
Please suggest.
Regards
Srinivas Gundala

Hi,
If i am not wrong, the system is reverseing the deduction it has made at the time of adv payment.
Its not deducting again.
Consolidate all the three documents -
- Adv pay
- Inv
- Payment
and you would appreciate the beauty of the concept.
Cheers
Raghu

Info type and subtype to stop income tax deduction for a month

can i know how to stop income tax deduction for a month for a specific employee. I understand that this s possible

Hi
You can use additional wage type (infotype 0015)
and subtype voluntary tax std is MVT1 as per SAP
if you maintain 0.01 value here and indicating the month
SAP calculated income tax is supressed and this is how u can stip income tax deduction for a month
with regards
partha
keep sharing and learning

With holding tax report with material and qty fields

Dear All,
Is there any standard report available with with holding tax data with material and qty fields.
Thanks,
Sekhar.

dear Friend,
Withholding tax will deduct on services. Hence Material and quantity is not relavent.
There is no report is available also.
reg
Madhu M

Error while sending PO (with tax code) from SSP to SUS via MM

Hello Experts
We are implementing Self Service Procurement and Supplier Self Services scenario.
We have created a SC with Tax Code say X in Self Service Procurement. The SC gets created as PO in R/3 (MM) system.
The IDoc which is getting created in the R/3 system has different segments than the one which gets created when we create the PO directly in R/3 system.
This IDoc which is seen in R/3 with the Status 26 - ' Error during syntax check of IDoc (outbound) '.
Please help, we are new to SSP.
Thanx and Regards
Gaurav
Edited by: Gaurav Giroti on Jan 29, 2009 1:36 PM
Edited by: Gaurav Giroti on Jan 29, 2009 1:37 PM

note 1311560 to be applied in ebp.

Tax code with more than one tax rate

Hi,
I am using TAXINN procedure and I created on tax codes with more than one rate. i.e. for service tax I created a tax code S1 with 3 rates as follows
Acc. Key    Tax %      condition type
VS9            12             JSE4
VS0              2             JES4
VSS              1             JHS4
When I am trying to post a document with the above tax code the system is giving the following error message
Tax code S1 may only contain one assignment line
Message no. FF731
Diagnosis
For direct postings to tax accounts, only tax codes containing exactly one tax line may be used. Tax codes with several rates or a nondeductible portion are not allowed here.
Procedure
Use a different tax code.
For direct postings to a tax account, you might have to define a separate tax code for which only one line with a percentage rate other than zero is active in percentage rate maintenance. All other lines must be inactive.
To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
Could you please let me know how to rectify this problem? I want to post 3 line items for each of base rate, Edu. Cess and Higher Edu.cess.
Advance thanks for your help and
Regards
Koteswara Rao Padarti

The problem is in the master data of the revenue account. the tax category should not be > and it should be *

Vendor - Tax deduction at lower rate - MIRO & FB60

Hi all,
Currently we are having one issue of u201CTax deduction at lower rateu201D for a Vendor who is having such certificate with him.
For amount purpose we have set the SPRO setting but the user is asking for the date control also since the Vendor is having the relevant certificate till 31.03.2012 and after that, lower rate Tax deduction will not be allowed.
Simple option is to change the Vendor Master with the original tax type+ Tax code (Normal Rate) combination to calculate tax at the normal rate. But if could not cross the amount limit before 31.03.2012 then that will be difficult to keep an eye on date i.e. 31.03.2012 and then change the master data of u201CNu2026u201D No. of Vendors .
We want to put a condition in a system as; system should check the system date with the tax type date to get a date control. We have restricted the date of u201Cnewly created tax typeu201D till 31.03.2012.
In case of MIRO testing, we have use a user exit which is correctly comparing the system date with the tax type date in runtime. If the tax type date is older than system date then system is throwing an error to change the master date (FK02 / XK02) of subject vendor.
In case of FB60 we are facing a problem since not able to cross confirm the tax type date with the system date. We are trying BTE u2013 1140 for FB60 but in runtime we are not able to get the tax related details / tables.
Is there any workaround or way in BTE u2013 1140 for FB60?
Regards,
Shridhar
Edited by: Shridhar Sawant on Nov 2, 2011 2:23 PM

Hi Ramesh,
In the SAP Std. setting of Formula we are maintaining one more line for same TAX TYPE + TAX CODE + COUNTRY combination but for the ending date of lower rate tax deduction.
Since there is no "To date" option in Formula setting, we are maintaining one more line For e.g. in the 1st line we have a date as 01.04.2011 (i.e. Valid from) and in the other line we have mentioned date as 01.01.2012 (i.e. To date) since Vendor is having the lower rate tax deduction certificate uptill 31.12.2011.
In the first line of formula (Valid from 01.04.2011) we have maintain :
To Base amt              W/tax    Reduction base amt.
175,000.00                 3.00               -
9,999,999,999.00     10.00     175,000.00
In the second line (Valid from 01.01.2012) of formula we have maintain :
To Base amt             W/tax    Reduction base amt.
9,999,999,999.00    10.00               -
Cross confirming the various scenarios since date accumulation of tax setting is on in Tax Type that we are considering.
Will confirm to you the change suggest by you.
If these changes doesn't work then we have to go to the option of User exit or BTE for MIRO and FB60 testing.
Have any idea about the above mention settings ?
Regards,
Shridhar

Extended withholding tax deduction from customer credit

hi all
configured the extended withholding tax for deducting tds from customer credit line items.
deduction is required only after the amount accumulation 2500/- (this is also configured)
1.is the recipient type and country is not required for the customer tds..? (it is not visible in the customer master, but is in vendor master)
2.in the amount accumulation for 2500/- consider the following scenario.
>>first bill amount 2450/- (no tax deduction)
>>second bill for Rs.100/- from which i need to deduct tax for 2550/-, since Rs.100 is not enough to deduct 10% tax from tax base 2550.00 it is throwing error.
pls help
with best regards,
sallu c.mathew

Hi Ajeesh,
As already mentionned in standardf help from sap, you use J1INCUST which is a report to record the with. tax certificates sent to you by your clients. In doing so, the system clears the wi. tax to a G/L account that records how much tax your customers have withheld on your behalf, known as the customer tax creditable account. You can offset this tax against your income tax payable at year-end.
And you run the report immediately you receive a certificate from a customer.
Then system creates an accounting document to transfer the withholding tax from the G/L account for the withholding tax deducted by your customers to the customer tax creditable account.
Best regards,
Tarek

Vendor tax deductions

Hi all,
Same vendor with different tax deductions. How to capture?

Hi raju,
Vendors are subject to withholding tax and input tax that means vat are anything
sales tax related to customer that is output tax.
In withholding tax as per 194c rent and commision salraies and traveling borkerage and interest this are related to wth
for this need to create withholding tax code and tax rates these tax code are assinged to vendor master based on tax code its automatically deducted,
related vat input need to create tax codes in ftxp at the time of invoice or payment if u select tax code its automatically deduct and its goto respective account based on assingment.

Tax deduction in EXPORT process

Hi
Please let me at what stage will we deduct tax ( during SAP business transaction ) in following senarios
1. When Form C is submitted
2. during Export process when ARE 1/bond is generated
3.when ARE 3 document/license is generate/bond
For above senario's I want to clarify that will we deduct tax while creating sales order or will we adjust it after invoice when we create bond/license.
Thanks

Hi,
1.C form is a sort of tax discount applicable when both the parties are registered under VAT (TIN No ) Say instead of 12.5 % tax bill at 2% tax if C form is received before PGI.Create a tax classification with C form and without C form and assign to your customer master and use the same in sales order.
2.Both exports (Except claim of rebate) and deemed exports are exempted from excise duty and sales tax as per govt norms,In sales order the excise values will be calculated but will be statistical (No account posting) the displayed value is only for creation of ARE forms (Export removal).
Regards,
Siraj

Incoming Payments with Tax only issue

Dear Support,
I have a client who wants to do an incoming payment to as they have received a TAX rebate from SARS (South African Revenue Service). The line that she needs to create needs to be 100% tax but the system doesn't allow you to do this. With the outgoing payments you can edit the tax amount as required but with the incoming payments that column is not active for some reason??
Any ideas on how they can process the TAX rebate in SAP? A journal won't work because the VAT report does not look at journals directly posted to the VAT control.
Regards
clayton.

Hi Clayton,
Follow the following process as a work around:
1) Create a Tax Group with 100% Tax and SARS as a Business Partner.
2) Create an Invoice for the ex amount R1000 + R1000 Tax (100% VAT). It will also be displayed on the VAT report.
3) On the nest line, Create a negative total for the R1000 with 0% VAT.
This will result in an Invoice total of only R1000 - which will be your tax amount. You can allocate your incoming payment against the invoice as you would normally do.
Kind regards
Carin.

POSTING_INTERFACE_DOCUMENT with tax holding base amount issue.

Hello Experts,
There is existing custom program which taking input from excel file and by using POSTING_INTERFACE_DOCUMENT FM they are posting Vendor Doc.
Now they want to add with tax holding base amount to be add based on Tax Code. Through recording i got fieldname like WITH_ITEM-WT_WITHCD
(tax code) and WITH_DIALG-WT_BASE (BASE AMOUNT).
I'm using above field names and passing values to table of structure FTPOST, but its not working. is there any other way to make this work
i found one table of structure FTTAX (Taxes for Internal Posting Interface) can it be useful to achieve the goal????
Thanks in Advance to all.

Uhm
As you can see you've two codes for every wt lines, the first code is not editable
Both the codes are the same values:
- First CB, CB
- Second CF, CF
The wt codes you need to transfer to your posting are from master data (I don't know if it's for vendor, LFBW, or customer, KNBW)
I suppose the order to show the wt depends on how they are set in master data
Now, I've never used fm POSTING_INTERFACE_DOCUMENT directly, but it's used by BI standard RFBIBL00 and I've used it many many times.
Usually the lines of wt have to have both codes, if it doesn't need to fill a code, this code has to fill with 'blank'
So if It moved the wt for RFBIL00:
- CB lines:
WITH_ITEM-WITHT                 = 'CB'
WITH_ITEM-WT_WITHCD       = SPACE
WITH_DIALG-WT_BAS           = 0.
- CF lines:
WITH_ITEM-WITHT                 = 'CF'
WITH_ITEM-WT_WITHCD       = 'CF'
WITH_DIALG-WT_BAS           = 500.
I repeat this is how the wt lines should be preparated for RFBIBL00, but this program calls POSTING_INTERFACE_DOCUMENT so I suppose it should be preparated in the same way.
You can also considere to use RFBIBL00 instead of fm
Max

Tax deductions with tax directive

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for