Tax Relevancy of Mater Records

Hi CIN Gurus
We are implementing my SAP ERP ECC 6.0,we are using TAXINN procedure
We are trying to maintain Tax relevancy for Master Records
In the Customer master,Material master for tax LST ,CST tax category JLST,JCST
is there,
Now to introduce VAT conditions in Customer master ,material master which type of Tax Category has to be Adopted ,Kindly let me know the procedure for this
Immediate response will be appreciated
Regards
Guruprasad

Hi Guru,
You will have only define Customer Tax classification and mAterial Tax classifications in Customer and material master. As tax gets detrmined based on 4 rules:
1. Delivering Plant (country of shipping point)
2. destination country
3. customer tax classification &
4. material tax classification
You determine the procedure and deince the tax categories in IMG. and define the Tax codes also representing LST/CST /VAT etc. Against each tax code maintain the tax data.
For Condition Type MWST maintain a tax code in condition record as per the access sequence what you want. system will read the Pricing procedure in the sales order and read MWST condition type. Against MWST system will read the access sequence what you have maintained and read the Tax code and against the tax code you have maintained in FTXP whether this tax code determines CST / LSt/VAt and what is the % .
Hope this clarifies. pl go thr below links for more info:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/09/ebf138cdd78a4be10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/EN/40/a23c39129ffe2ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/EN/40/a23c39129ffe2ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://sap-img.com/sd009.htm
Incase you want any clarifications pl give revert back.
REWARD IF IT HELPS
regards
Srini

Similar Messages

Error to Define Tax Relevancy Of Master Records

Hi ,
I created a condition type ( Y007) with category as 'D' ( TAX) and class as 'A'. and then i tried to Define Tax Relevancy Of Master Records ( Customer taxes) but it gives the message "Condition type Y007 is not defined for taxes" . its fine when i use the class as 'D' or 'G' but the requirement is it should be 'A' as discount or surcharge.
Any one can help on this if this is possible??
if not then the other situation is if i use class as 'D' or 'G' then in the section"changes which can be made" the calculat. type disappears...is there any way to have it appear on the screen??
thanks...

Hi
For tax condition types, condition class should also be D.
Pls check the configuration for MWST condition type. If you have the need to create a new condition type, please copy MWST or some standard tax condition type and create a new one, instead of creating a new condition type itself. Also check for the access sequence. For tax condition types most of the times MWST access sequence will be the correct one.
So, the tax c.type should have D both in condition category and condition class.
You can have c.class as D (Not G) and then you can have the calculation type as A
Rwd points if it helps.

Error in GR/IR - Tax relevancy

We are implementing SAP ECC6 in a country where there is no tax. But during the settings, settings requires to assign a tax procedure and for posting certain accounts like GR/IR clearing, tax relevant setting is required as a mandatory from the system. How can we avoid this situation since we are in a country where no tax is there?
Regars

Hi Friends
What you have suggested to this issue is to make posting with a zero percentage tax code by making the all tax allowed setting in the GL master.
But, since we are operating in a country where there is no tax, is there any other way we can make setting so that system will not issue any message about the tax relevancy in postings ?

Not to show the detail records even though the mater records are existing.

Dear Oracle
I would like not to show the detail records even though the mater records are existing. Is there any block preperty I can set?
Thanks

I don't know the reason why you would want to do that but if you do not want to any record in the master block in
a master-details format, then you could achieve this by setting the WHERE clause property in the block.
e.g., master block DEPT (base table DEPT) and detail block EMP (base table EMP)
table DEPT is as follow
dept_id (pk)
dept_name
table EMP is as follow
emp_id
emp_name
dept_id (fk)
then you can set the WHERE clause in the DEPT block as follows
exists (select 1 from emp a where a.dept_id = dept.dept_id)
hope this help

Update Tax Code in Infor record from PO

Dear Experts ,
I want to update the tax code in info record through PO , just like net price etc .
Please let us kw hw can it be done ?
Regards
Anis

Hi,
Tax code is picked as per following priority:
1) From condition NAVS in transaction MEK1.
If point 1 is not maintained then it goes to point 2
2) From Purchasing data of the infor record.
In your case, you can skip point 1 and then directly maintain the tax code in purchasing data of infor record.
Regards
Karan

RFEULIST CZ - No. of tax-relevant docs

Hi all,
In TC RFEULIST (prg. RFASLD15, EU Sales & Purchases list for CZ, PL, HU) there is a column "No. Docs" in the report (field NO_OF_DOCUMENT). This is...
Number of Tax-Relevant Documents
Specifies the number of documents that the report has selected, in accordance with the entries on the report selection screen.
...and is required only for Czech Republic (obligation to report number of taxable events within EU). When we run the report with checkbox "Line item display" then the output lists every single invoice. Hence, I would anticipate that this column must always contain "1" since 1 invoice = 1 tax-relevant document. However, there are some lines with value "0". In the xml file we then have correct amounts per services and good deliveries but the number of documents is shortened.
Does anyone have an idea how this value is determined and why it is possible to have zero document count per line?
thanks to all,
John

I found that the problem is with multiline documents. These have only 1 line displayed, the column for item number displays the higgest item number, the amount is correctly displayed as a total of all items and the column "No. Docs" contains zero.
The generic EC Sales List TC S_ALR_87012400 shows correctly every single line for multiline docs.
I did not find any Note about this...

Tax Code and Condtion Record

HI,
I know the tax procedure of TAXINN, but i have small doubt about Tax Code and Conditon Record.
If we maintain the Tax Percentage i n the Tax Code and Condtion Record also. What is the use maintain the Tax Percentage in two menctioned placess.
Thanks,

Dear,
If you are using tax procedure TAXINN then maintain percentage in FV11, there is no need to maintain the same at Tax code level.
Br,Vivek

Inter-Company accounts tax relevance

Hi
This is more a Finance question related to SAP. I am aware that Inter/Co trnasactions are not normally tax relevant (E.g. Company A sells products to Co B).
However, we have a scenario, where one company pays (with tax ) for certain outside supplyon behalf of another I/Co. The I/Co accounts are created as "Not tax relevant" and hence the system is throwing an error message (I/C account does not allow P1).
In my opinion, in this scenario, the I/Co accounts need to be tax relevant. I would like to know best practice approach.
Thanks
NW

Hi,
You can use the tax processing in the intercompany scenario.
This is normal as the company paying to outsider pays the tax also and then recover the total amount from the other company.
Regards,
SDNer

Check issue account tax relevant field

Friends,
I have created a check issue account with selecting tax category * and posting without tax allowed fields in control data. while posting F-48 if i am trying to give check issue account in bank account field then system is giving error message Tax relevant accounts not defined inthis are. Then after correcting the GL master by removing the tax category and posting without tax fields as blank then system is accepting the postings.
What is the logic. and exactly for which accounts we have to select tax category and posting w/o tax fields in control data in gl master.

hi,
so you've to populate tax code (/ no tax code) for every line-item. You can determine whether tax code is nedded or not with field SKB1-MWSKZ
A.
Message was edited by: Andreas Mann

How can i get the tax code from Condition record number

Hi all,
i have the Condition record number from which i have to get the tax code as i looked inthe KNOP that Condition record number there but no tax code is maintained there.
so is there any other way to find the tax code for particular Condition record number
Regards
suresh

hi suresh,
can u tell me the field name for condition record number and in which table it is stored.
because i knew one condition number which is stored in table EKKO and the field name is
KNUMV- Number of the document condition.
from ekko take relevant details and look for ekpo where u find the tax code
filed name of the tax code id MWSKZ- Tax on sales/purchases code

Regarding tax code in condition records in SD & MM

In MM we are maintaining net price in info record and tax code is given there, when it is settle with MRKO its calculating rightly,
Eg: Info record price for XX material is 100 and tax code maintained AA as 12.5%
In FI entries after FI settlement its showing right amount as 112.5 with tax
My issue is the same cost of that material is flowing from material info record to DP90 and in to sales order with the 100rs,here I have maintained two conditions as
UTXJ and ZVAT
For this I have maintained access sequence as
UTXJ- plant/tax classification customer1/tax classification material 1 as
ZVAT- plant/sales org/material
When ever with the condition utxj comes it will take 12.5% tax and for
zvat I am directly maintaing 20% vat on few materials.
In condition records if I maintain tax code here for 12.5% as A1 and A2 as 20
In MM tax code is maintained and in SD in condition records if tax code is maintained on same cost of that material what will be the effect in accounting will be. Please guide me.

You might be aware of the fact that Tax code used for MM is different from SD.
As for MM, Tax code are for input tax.
Whereas, for SD., Tax code are for output tax.
And you define this in FTXP while creating a Tax code.
If in SD Pricing, you condition for Tax are:
Condition
Value
Amount
tax code
Account Key
PR00-Base Price
100.00
ERL
UTXJ
12.5%
12.50
A1
MW1
ZVAT
20%
40
A2
MW2
Total Price after TAX
152.50
The accounting doc will generate on the bases of GL account maintain Tcode OB40.
Where,
Transaction = Account Key
There for respective transaction MW1 & MW2, you have to maintain respective relevant GL Accounts.
Transaction
MW1
GL Account
3210000
Transaction
MW2
GL Account
3210001
Whereas, Say, if your transaction or the account key is common for both condition type in pricing, say, MWS.
Then in that case you need to active rule for tax code.
With that in MWS tax code column will get active.
Therefore you can maintain GL accounts as
Transaction
MWS
Tax Code
GL Account
A1
3210000
A2
3210001
Regards
JP

Tax Relevant Classification

Hi,
Refer to note 178824, I have to setup VK11 to the table 397.
But It doesnu2019t allow me to put the code that I want. When I clicked u201CAnalysisu201D button in sales order, I got tax rel. classif. = SG. But I canu2019t set SG in VK11.
In VK11, I can only put these codes:
CP     Cofins Payment
GP     General WHT payment
IW     ISS WHT Invoice
PP     PIS WHT Payment
RP     IR WHT Payment
SP     CSLL WHT payment
What is it?
Please kindly advise me how I can put u201CSGu201D in VK11. Thank you very much.
Regards,
Darin

hi,
what u can do is as the configuration i told was for direct taxes,bt ur issue is of withholding tax which is a indirect tax type.
maintain a condition type as normal sales tax with condition class as D
and another condition as condition class w,
now in the pricing procedure u can use from column to calculate the with holding tax,,
i mean
stepno     c.type     fr      to
567         abcd
568         z123       567
note:abcd is sales tax c.type with tax code(tax code appear in cond. record because of c.class d)
        and z123 is your condition type(withholding tax) now the value can be generated .
you can even use a relevant subtotal to calculate 568 value
thanks
revert if helpful
mohit singh

Tax Form: HR_F_MMREF_1_MD 'RV' Record 'Source Field Names'

Hi,
Without "Save" of the original (delivered) definition of the subject "Tax Form", the form was updated and customized by mistake or stupidity. (We are ECC 6.0 HR Rel 600 Level 0022 Payroll.)
If anyone can browse his or her "Tax Form Definition" via SPRO=>U S Payroll=>Tax Reporter=>Tax Form Definition=>Define Original Tax Form=> Select "HR_F_MMREF_1_MD" and RV Record..
Please let me know the Source Field Names of the following locations:
RV 088
RV 149
RV 185
RV 209
RV 233
RV 269
RV 297
RV 312
RV 320....
Thanks.
Ben

Hi Arthi,
Thanks for the reply , for TAX form Group W2M1, W2M2, W2M3 , while configuring Evaluation of tax form
the following items required to select
Evaluation of tax forms (Employee info required)
Time ranges , in which data will be stored
Reporting of retro calculation
Please let me know how to configure these evaluation forms ?? and Does any wagetypes needed to be assigned to these tax form groups ??
Note:
The customers has to use manual entries options in PU19 and use the below TFG to populate the respective fields accordingly.
W2M1 MW508-Employer Total Tax Exempt Credits
W2M2 MW508-Overpayment to be credited
W2M3 MW508-Overpayment to be refunded

Capturing Tax code from info record into shopping cart

We have a requirement where in we need to capture the tax code from the info record into the shopping cart in SRM .
If anyone has worked on a similar requirement , could you kindly share the details related to the solution.

Dear Poster
Your thread has had no response since it's creation over
2 weeks ago, therefore, I recommend that you either:
- Rephrase the question.
- Provide additional Information to prompt a response.
- Close the thread if the answer is already known.
Thank you for your compliance in this regard.
Jason Boggans
SAP SRM SDN Moderator

TAXINN SD For Excise Duty where to maintain TAX CODE in condition record?

is Tax code necessary for excise determination in TAXINN in SD Scenario? While maintaining condition record ( JEXP) for Excise access sequence JEXC doesnu2019t has Tax Code field Whereas for Sale Tax determination ( JCST/JLST) access sequence JLST /CST which has Tax code field . (In TAXINN we create Dummy tax code (blank))
is it true whatever I have written ? If yes then what is use of tax code where it triggers in FI Posting? Why we use only for Sale Tax not for Excise duty?
If u go to SAP Std condition type & access sequence provide for CIN in SD (TAXINN) While maintaining condition record ( JEXP) for Excise. Access sequence JEXC doesnu2019t has Tax Code field . do u think we should modify that create field for Tax code ..... Pl check in system & answer the question .......I hope u understand what i want to ask.

Hi,
As per my knowledge, Excise is not Tax its a Duty....
Excise gets added to your base price and the tax is calculated on the whole amount and not only the basic price.
Say if u r manufacturing a material and u r under excise regulations, then without paying excise duty you can't move the goods out of your premises, Here even before you sell the material to a customer the excise duty is paid from you. But when u will be selling the material to a customer, the customer is charged the excise duty which gets added to the net value and then the sales tax is calculated.
If u see a sale order condition tab page, there are two fields
1. Net Value 2. Tax
Net value is the value which includes the excise duty and the tax is only the CST/LST/VAT.
Regards

Tax Relevancy of Mater Records

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for