Tax Relevant Classification

Hi,
Refer to note 178824, I have to setup VK11 to the table 397.
But It doesnu2019t allow me to put the code that I want. When I clicked u201CAnalysisu201D button in sales order, I got tax rel. classif. = SG. But I canu2019t set SG in VK11.
In VK11, I can only put these codes:
CP     Cofins Payment
GP     General WHT payment
IW     ISS WHT Invoice
PP     PIS WHT Payment
RP     IR WHT Payment
SP     CSLL WHT payment
What is it?
Please kindly advise me how I can put u201CSGu201D in VK11. Thank you very much.
Regards,
Darin

hi,
what u can do is as the configuration i told was for direct taxes,bt ur issue is of withholding tax which is a indirect tax type.
maintain a condition type as normal sales tax with condition class as D
and another condition as condition class w,
now in the pricing procedure u can use from column to calculate the with holding tax,,
i mean
stepno     c.type     fr      to
567         abcd
568         z123       567
note:abcd is sales tax c.type with tax code(tax code appear in cond. record because of c.class d)
        and z123 is your condition type(withholding tax) now the value can be generated .
you can even use a relevant subtotal to calculate 568 value
thanks
revert if helpful
mohit singh

Similar Messages

Tax Relevancy of Mater Records

Hi CIN Gurus
We are implementing my SAP ERP ECC 6.0,we are using TAXINN procedure
We are trying to maintain Tax relevancy for Master Records
In the Customer master,Material master for tax LST ,CST tax category JLST,JCST
is there,
Now to introduce VAT conditions in Customer master ,material master which type of Tax Category has to be Adopted ,Kindly let me know the procedure for this
Immediate response will be appreciated
Regards
Guruprasad

Hi Guru,
You will have only define Customer Tax classification and mAterial Tax classifications in Customer and material master. As tax gets detrmined based on 4 rules:
1. Delivering Plant (country of shipping point)
2. destination country
3. customer tax classification &
4. material tax classification
You determine the procedure and deince the tax categories in IMG. and define the Tax codes also representing LST/CST /VAT etc. Against each tax code maintain the tax data.
For Condition Type MWST maintain a tax code in condition record as per the access sequence what you want. system will read the Pricing procedure in the sales order and read MWST condition type. Against MWST system will read the access sequence what you have maintained and read the Tax code and against the tax code you have maintained in FTXP whether this tax code determines CST / LSt/VAt and what is the % .
Hope this clarifies. pl go thr below links for more info:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/09/ebf138cdd78a4be10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/EN/40/a23c39129ffe2ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/EN/40/a23c39129ffe2ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://sap-img.com/sd009.htm
Incase you want any clarifications pl give revert back.
REWARD IF IT HELPS
regards
Srini

Error in GR/IR - Tax relevancy

We are implementing SAP ECC6 in a country where there is no tax. But during the settings, settings requires to assign a tax procedure and for posting certain accounts like GR/IR clearing, tax relevant setting is required as a mandatory from the system. How can we avoid this situation since we are in a country where no tax is there?
Regars

Hi Friends
What you have suggested to this issue is to make posting with a zero percentage tax code by making the all tax allowed setting in the GL master.
But, since we are operating in a country where there is no tax, is there any other way we can make setting so that system will not issue any message about the tax relevancy in postings ?

Error to Define Tax Relevancy Of Master Records

Hi ,
I created a condition type ( Y007) with category as 'D' ( TAX) and class as 'A'. and then i tried to Define Tax Relevancy Of Master Records ( Customer taxes) but it gives the message "Condition type Y007 is not defined for taxes" . its fine when i use the class as 'D' or 'G' but the requirement is it should be 'A' as discount or surcharge.
Any one can help on this if this is possible??
if not then the other situation is if i use class as 'D' or 'G' then in the section"changes which can be made" the calculat. type disappears...is there any way to have it appear on the screen??
thanks...

Hi
For tax condition types, condition class should also be D.
Pls check the configuration for MWST condition type. If you have the need to create a new condition type, please copy MWST or some standard tax condition type and create a new one, instead of creating a new condition type itself. Also check for the access sequence. For tax condition types most of the times MWST access sequence will be the correct one.
So, the tax c.type should have D both in condition category and condition class.
You can have c.class as D (Not G) and then you can have the calculation type as A
Rwd points if it helps.

RFEULIST CZ - No. of tax-relevant docs

Hi all,
In TC RFEULIST (prg. RFASLD15, EU Sales & Purchases list for CZ, PL, HU) there is a column "No. Docs" in the report (field NO_OF_DOCUMENT). This is...
Number of Tax-Relevant Documents
Specifies the number of documents that the report has selected, in accordance with the entries on the report selection screen.
...and is required only for Czech Republic (obligation to report number of taxable events within EU). When we run the report with checkbox "Line item display" then the output lists every single invoice. Hence, I would anticipate that this column must always contain "1" since 1 invoice = 1 tax-relevant document. However, there are some lines with value "0". In the xml file we then have correct amounts per services and good deliveries but the number of documents is shortened.
Does anyone have an idea how this value is determined and why it is possible to have zero document count per line?
thanks to all,
John

I found that the problem is with multiline documents. These have only 1 line displayed, the column for item number displays the higgest item number, the amount is correctly displayed as a total of all items and the column "No. Docs" contains zero.
The generic EC Sales List TC S_ALR_87012400 shows correctly every single line for multiline docs.
I did not find any Note about this...

Inter-Company accounts tax relevance

Hi
This is more a Finance question related to SAP. I am aware that Inter/Co trnasactions are not normally tax relevant (E.g. Company A sells products to Co B).
However, we have a scenario, where one company pays (with tax ) for certain outside supplyon behalf of another I/Co. The I/Co accounts are created as "Not tax relevant" and hence the system is throwing an error message (I/C account does not allow P1).
In my opinion, in this scenario, the I/Co accounts need to be tax relevant. I would like to know best practice approach.
Thanks
NW

Hi,
You can use the tax processing in the intercompany scenario.
This is normal as the company paying to outsider pays the tax also and then recover the total amount from the other company.
Regards,
SDNer

Check issue account tax relevant field

Friends,
I have created a check issue account with selecting tax category * and posting without tax allowed fields in control data. while posting F-48 if i am trying to give check issue account in bank account field then system is giving error message Tax relevant accounts not defined inthis are. Then after correcting the GL master by removing the tax category and posting without tax fields as blank then system is accepting the postings.
What is the logic. and exactly for which accounts we have to select tax category and posting w/o tax fields in control data in gl master.

hi,
so you've to populate tax code (/ no tax code) for every line-item. You can determine whether tax code is nedded or not with field SKB1-MWSKZ
A.
Message was edited by: Andreas Mann

RMDATIND BMMH2 Tax category classification issue

I am creating material masters using the direct input program RMDATIND. The structure BMMH2 has the fields for transferring the tax category classification by country. I have done this many times for sales areas that produce in or ship from several different countries. We now are converting a business that ships from 15 different European countries, each with its own VAT tax classification. The BMMH1 and BMMH2 structures and the RMDATIND program only allow for a maximum 9 different countries. If I try to create the material masters with only 9 of the countries, I get the "TAX category classification is not maintained" error. How do I get around this?

Hi,
when you say more than 9 tax classifications for a country , the answer is 'No'.
when you say more than 9 countries answer is 'YES'.
To answer main question..
1) File should have BMMH2 data.
2)Input structure in LSMW should have all BMMH2 fields
3)If a country has more than one value it should be filled in a single row..
For ex: - BMMH2-ALAND1 = 'CA' BMMH2-TATY1 = 'MSWP' BMMH2-TAXM1 = '0'. BMMH2-TATY2 = 'MSWP' BMMH2-TAXM2 = '0'. BMMH2-TATY3 = 'MSWP' BMMH2-TAXM3 = '0'.(means per country one row for tax info)
4) Fill all the blank fields with NODATA '/' values.
The final BMMH2 structures should look like this...
BMMH2-ALAND1 = 'US'.
BMMH2-TATY1 = 'MSWP'.
BMMH2-TAXM1 = '1'
Transfer record.
BMMH2-ALAND1 = 'CA'
BMMH2-TATY1 = 'MSWP'
BMMH2-TAXM1 = '0'.
BMMH2-ALAND1 = 'CA'.
BMMH2-TATY2 = 'MSWP'.
BMMH2-TAXM2 = '0'.
BMMH2-ALAND1 = 'CA'.
BMMH2-TATY3 = 'MSWP'.
BMMH2-TAXM3 = '0'.
transfer record.
BMMH2-ALAND1 = 'SG'.
BMMH2-TATY1 = 'MSWP'.
BMMH2-TAXM1 = '0'
transfer record.
I have just solved the issue.so let me know if any one has stil queries.
Thanks
Sudheer
Edited by: Tirumala Kashibhatla on Jul 24, 2010 2:43 AM
Edited by: Tirumala Kashibhatla on Jul 24, 2010 2:52 AM

Default profit centers Plant wise for Balance Sheet tax relevant Items.

Dear All,
We have an issue in profit center acccounting.
In balance sheet accounts, Vat input tax payable, TDS payable, Cenvat clearing etc are picking profit center from 3KEH. When Exicse is getting captured cenvat clearing account having the profit center but while doing the MIRO cenvat clearing do not have profit center & plant.
Why it is so?
Basically we are doing the following steps.
1. Purchase order creation ME21N.
2.Goods received via migo
3. invoice receipt via miro.
At the time of miro posting, system creates automatically accounting document, with default profit center maintained in 3KEH, which are assigned to Vat input tax payable, TDS payable, other tax accounts. For GR/IR clearing account right profit center is picking without any mistake, while doing MIGO & MIRO.
We need to extract the Balance Sheet profit center wise at plant level.
Derivation rule is created for this balance sheet account along with Valuation area condition to post to correct profit center maintained under Tcode: 3KEI . But system is taking only default profit center (3KEH).
I have checked configuration and the following areas like Material master costing view, tax code areas, and account group but did not find any mistake.
Please advice and Guide us, how to get correct profit center at plant level for these balance sheet accounts instead of default. (I want to make default profit centers plant wise).
It is urgent.
Thanks,
Shailendra Gupta.

Hi!
You can use following report :
S_ALR_87013336 (Report for Balance sheet at Profit Center and Group Level).
Hope this will help.
Thanks & Regards,
Taral Patel

Quiz about tax classification

Hi, experts,
There is a problem about tax classification that need ur help..
In billing document, there are 2 tax classification, one is TaxClass1-Cust at header , another one is Tax class. mat. at item level, normally, there will only have 1 number on these two tax classification.
But I found in one of our billing document, there are 2 numbers in Tax class. mat., is anyone know why and what's the impact regarding this?
Thanks for ur kindly help in advance!

hi,
Tax is determined based on
1) organizational structure, country, region, or city of delivering plants and
2) country or receiving customer
3) combination with tax relevancy indicators on the customer and material master records.
check this
Customer Taxes Material Taxes Rate Taxes
 0 0 0 %
 0 1 0 %
 1 0 0 %
 1 1 9 %
In this example, if both the Customer Master and Material Master Tax code is 1, Tax will be included when you create the Sales Order.
CHAN
Message was edited by:
 CHAN HARI

Tax classification

hi!
how to create tax classification settnigs in billing of sales area data section of Customer Master.
thankyou

Hi,
To create new tax classification for customer master go to>>SPRO>>Sales & Distribution>>Basic functions>>Taxes>>Define tax relevancy of master records.
Select customer taxes.
In this screen enter new tax category. Tax category is nothing but the condition used in sales pricing to determine all the taxes relevant for that country.
Enter tax classification of the customer eg: 0 for tax exempt, 1 for liable for taxes.
Save the configuration.
Now in Customer master data>>Sales area data>>Billing Document screen you will get the tax category data. Enter relevant tax classification against that tax category.
System considers this classification as one of the criterias to calculate the taxes in sales pricing.
Regards,
Savita Swami

Routines for determine the customer tax classification in VF02

Hi
i have to find out how the customer tax classification values is coming in VF02.customer tax classification value should be '0'.but in my case it is coming '1'.
i have to find out ,how the calculations has to be done and where should i modify the value.it is an production support issue.
Please guide me .what are the possible ways to fix the issue.
Regards,
Kiran

I'm assuming that, the country is India and based on its requirement:
Sales tax is a state government revenue. There are two types of sales taxes, Local sales tax & central sales tax. Local sales tax is intra state whereas CST is inter state.
Example of LST : Point of sale i.e. delivering plant & ship to party are within the same state. The rates are defined by the respective state governments.
Example of CST : The Delivering plant & Ship to party geographic locations are 2 different states. At the point of sales from one state, the ST goes to that state govt. & consignment is despatched to the Ship to party. Once that consignment is received at the ship to party state, sales tax will be levied once the sales is registered there. For this case, the LST that is applicable by the Ship to party further will not be applicable in all probability to be captured in SAP.
Stock transfer : This does not attract any sales tax. The consignment is transferred from one D plant to another D plant irrespective of inter/intra state sales. The invoice that is accompanied with the consignment thus shall not have any final value. It's a zero value invoice, but the basic prices needed to be mentioned.
The selling organisations normally needs to register with the sales tax authority of the respective state to have a warehouse or D plant to avoid the double taxation for their dealers/distributors.
Now, the pricing procedure that is there in 4.7 is Factory sale with formula-JFACT, in which the CST condition type is JIN1 & the LST is probably JIN2. There may be surcharge cond types as well which will calculate the amount on either JIN1 or JIN2.
For config :
1.SPRO > S&D > Basic fn. > Pricing > Pricing control > Define & assign Pric. procedure > Maintain Pric proc.
2. The tax rates are normally driven from the Tax classification of Customer & Material access. To do this config, S&D >Basic fn. > Taxes. You need to include the condition type for country IN in 'Define tax determin rule'.
3. Same path : But go to Tax relevancy of master records where you configure the condition type & options of rates that will flow to these masters. One needs to understand here properly as u need to have unique combinations for picking the sales tax rates. I will try to demonstrate the smallest example. Let's say, the LST rates are 2%,4% & 0%. I will have two options for material master here. 1 for taxable & 2 for not taxable.
For customer master, I will have 1-LST 2%, 2-LST4% & 3-LST0%. When I create master records for LST thru VK11 for JIN2, I will chose the access where the combinations of customer & material tax classifications are available. If this access does not exist create it under an access sequence. But normally this is standard. The condition records will look like,
Cust-Tax classi.          Material tax claasi.        Rate           Tax code
        1                                    1                         2%               A1
        2                                    1                         4%               A1
        3                                    1                         0%               A1
Remember, rates are flown from the tax codes. Tax codes can be created thru T code FTXP. This is normally a FI job.
Hope this info helps
Regards
Manthan.

Check tax classification; maintenance is incomplete

Dear All,
I am facing the above issue while replicating the Sold-to-party from CRM UI(2007) to ECC 6.O . Systsem is throwing the above error at BDoc level. I maintained all the BP tax relevent settings in both the system. System is showing the data tax classification mapping in green colour. Tax classification field is mandaroty field in. I have maintained the data in CRM BP tax classification field still the system is giving the above error.
Kindly guid me to over come the same.
Regards
Ashwin

I have the same issue. How did you solve the problem?

Error account (GL a/c NO:) has been set as not relevent for tax

Hi,
While posting MIRO throughing error message " Error account (GL a/c NO:) has been set as not relevent for tax "
Kindly guide how to resolve the issue
Thanks & Regards
Lakshmi Kanth Reddy

Hi Reddy,
System throws up the message because the GL account you have entered has not made Tax relevant in the Control tab. 2 things I would like to point out -
a) Should you need the tax code for the particular GL account, then change the GL account master and make it relevant for tax.
b) If the tax code is not needed, then delete from the MIRO transaction and then post the document.
Important point - Mostly for all the MIRO transactions, tax code is made relevant for tax in the GL master.
Hope this helps.
Vikas.

How to find paricular GL ACCOUNT is relevant to tax or not.

Hi ,
Actually i am abaper working on FI MODULE.
How to find paricular GL ACCOUNT is relevant to tax or not.
Please provide the tcodes and necessary information..where to check .
Thanks & Regards,
Hari priya

Hi Dianne,
i checked in FS00 for my gl accounts.
1. 60004100 : Tax category is Only input tax allowed
posting without tax allowed is ticked .
The following message is displaying..
G/L account 60004100 is relevant to tax; check code
Message no. FS219
Diagnosis
You are posting to a tax-relevant account which does not, however,
require the entry of a tax code.
Procedure
Check to see whether the transaction you are currently processing is
actually not tax-relevant, and enter a valid tax code, if necessary.
Effects on Customizing
You can define when this system message is to be issued in accordance
with your requirements.
You do this in Customizing as follows: Cross-Application Components ->
Bank Directory -> Change Message Control.
The application area and message number can be taken from the technical
documentation.
please help me to solve this issue.
thanks & regards,
Hari priya

Tax Relevant Classification

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for