Temp table space

Hi, am trying to create a new report based on a view.
But the report is running out of temp table space.
can somebody tell me what to do >?
thanks

this is most likely a dba job to make sure the temp tablespace is set to automatically increment (or have a set minimum amount) required to run Discoverer reports

Similar Messages

Temp Tables space problem with ORA-01114 and ORA-27072:

RDBMS :Oracle:9.2.0
OS: Linux AS3
Storage: SAND arrray (RAID 5)
Problem on exeuting dml statement
SQL> select * from myview ;
select * from myview
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01114: IO error writing block to file 201 (block # 3977)
ORA-27072: skgfdisp: I/O error
Linux Error: 28: No space left on device
Additional information: 3976
ORA-01114: IO error writing block to file 201 (block # 3977)
ORA-27072: skgfdisp: I/O error
Linux Error: 28: No space left on device
Additional information: 3976
With Regards
Joy

Hello joy,
So, still looking for solution. I suggest you a sloution and it works well only if as you mentioned (in your previous post) that file causing error is temp file. So, get rid of this better you create new temporary table space and drop old one and then delete the old files manually.
But this will work only for Temp Tablespace not for normal tablespaces and datafiles. Prepare new temporary tablespace at different location from the previous one, try to make it on different disk beacuse it may be due to corruption of physical medium too.
Try this. If it works... you are through... otherwise i have no other options...
Please update.....

Temp Tables Space error

Hi Friends,
We are using two fact tables in a query along with three master tables.
We have tried to increase the table space for temp several times. But due to loads of data increasing in the facts We are struck back by the error could not increase the temp tablespace by 256M.
The total row counts for the tables are Table1:6872692, Table2:5365824.
Please suggest what could be done to over come the error. I know view could be used but even that is not jelling.
Thanks,
ravi.

Are the tables in the local or remote database? Trying to understand if your problem is related to Heterogeneous Connectivity (this forum) since you didn't give details

Move a table from one table space to another tablespace and different table

Hi,
I have a 60gb table nearly 200 million records in it and the table has range partition.
inorder to archive this table we have created 3 different tables and 3 different tablespaces for the tables.
I want to move certain partitions to tableA and certain partitions to tableB and on to tableC and on the top i'm creating a view to access these 3 tables.
Is there any technique to move the partition wise data to different tables. is there any new technique in 11g database?
The database is 11gr1
linux rhel5 x-86-64
Edited by: user8894072 on Oct 12, 2010 2:03 PM

if i do that like each partition has some millions of records. and the undotablespace is filling out and also the temp table space is filling out. The performance is very very poor if i use the create statement.
Insert INTO TableA (select * FROM <BASETABLE> where pay_end_dt between '01-Jan-1999' and '31-Dec-2005')
the above statement is also degrading the performance. I just need the synatx to move the partioned wise data to new table.

Temporary table space usage

Hi could someone help me ...
for the following query...
SELECT returnflag
, linestatus
, sum(quantity) as sum_qty
, sum(extendedprice) as sum_base_price
, sum(extendedprice * (1 - iscount)) as sum_disc_price
, sum(extendedprice * (1 - iscount) * (1 + l_tax)) as sum_charge
, avg(quantity) as avg_qty, avg(extendedprice) as avg_price
, avg(iscount) as avg_disc, count(*) as count_order
FROM lineitem
WHERE shipdate <= date '1998-12-01'
GROUP BY returnflag, linestatus
ORDER BY returnflag, linestatus;
Explain Plan :
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 5 | 135 | 299K (2)| 01:00:00 |
| 1 | SORT GROUP BY | | 5 | 135 | 299K (2)| 01:00:00 |
|* 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| LINEITEM | 57M| 1493M| 297K (1)| 00:59:35 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - filter("L_SHIPDATE"<=TO_DATE(' 1998-09-02 00:00:00',
'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))
would any parts of this query be carried out on the temporary table space (sums and averages? / sort group by?) ... or what impact would the temp table space have when running this query?
any help would be appriciated

im using 11g r2,
what about usage of temporary table space (approximatly) with the following ..
============================================
create view revenue (supplier_no, total_revenue) as
select
suppkey, sum(extendedprice * (1 - iscount))
from
lineitem
where
shipdate >= date '1994-12-01'
group by
suppkey;
select suppkey, name, address, phone, total_revenue
from supplier, revenue
where suppkey = supplier_no and total_revenue = (select max(total_revenue)from revenue)
order by suppkey;
==========================================================
View created.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 2790460729
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)|
Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 50000 | 5126K| | 381K (1)|
01:16:23 |
| 1 | MERGE JOIN | | 50000 | 5126K| | 381K (1)|
01:16:23 |
| 2 | SORT JOIN | | 100K| 3027K| | 380K (1)|
01:16:09 |
|* 3 | VIEW | REVENUE | 100K| 3027K| | 380K (1)|
01:16:09 |
| 4 | WINDOW BUFFER | | 100K| 2148K| | 380K (1)|
01:16:09 |
| 5 | HASH GROUP BY | | 100K| 2148K| 1207M| 380K (1)|
01:16:09 |
|* 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| LINEITEM | 34M| 733M| | 297K (1)|
00:59:35 |
|* 7 | SORT JOIN | | 50000 | 3613K| 8712K| 1182 (1)|
00:00:15 |
| 8 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SUPPLIER | 50000 | 3613K| | 308 (1)|
00:00:04 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
3 - filter("TOTAL_REVENUE"="ITEM_1")
6 - filter("L_SHIPDATE">=TO_DATE(' 1994-12-01 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd
hh24:mi:ss'))
7 - access("S_SUPPKEY"="SUPPLIER_NO")
filter("S_SUPPKEY"="SUPPLIER_NO")
Statistics
=========================================================
presumably temp table space will be used for sort and merge joins? .. but how does temp table space work with the view?

Disk space transaction and temp table lock in oracle

Hi,
Today many sessions used to get disk space transaction lock and temp table lock and i am seeing these locks first time in my Production database,
is there any workaround to avoid this contension.
Thanks
Prakash GR

Post your version (all 3 decimal places).
Post the SELECT statement and results that have led you to this conclusion.
Other than the fact that you have seen a number what, precisely, is the issue.

Unable to extend the temp segment by 2560 in table space TEMP

Hi,
I am running the procedure, it aggregate the data, it's taking minimum 1 hour to complete. B4 complete it throw an error:
ORA-01652 - Unable to extend the temp segment by 2560 in table space TEMP.
Note: Tround 5GB disk space is there.
Please help and give me your suggestions.
Thanks
Sathya

Well, I'll go out on a limb and suggest that the problem is that the procedure ran out of TEMP space. It's relatively easy to generate 5 GB of intermediate results to sort in the space of an hour. If other sessions were using TEMP space at the same time, that would obviously reduce the amount available to this procedure.
Your two options would be to decrease the amount of sorting that the procedure needs to do or to allocate more TEMP space for it.
Justin

Difference between Temp table and Variable table and which one is better performance wise?

Hello,
Anyone could you explain What is difference between Temp Table (#, ##) and Variable table (DECLARE @V TABLE (EMP_ID INT)) ?
Which one is recommended to use for better performance?
also Is it possible to create CLUSTER and NONCLUSTER Index on Variable table?
In my case: 1-2 days transactional data are more than 3-4 Millions. I tried using both # and table variable and found table variable is faster.
Is that Table variable using Memory or Disk space?
Thanks Shiven:) If Answer is Helpful, Please Vote

Check following link to see differences b/w TempTable & TableVariable: http://sqlwithmanoj.com/2010/05/15/temporary-tables-vs-table-variables/
TempTables & TableVariables both use memory & tempDB in similar manner, check this blog post: http://sqlwithmanoj.com/2010/07/20/table-variables-are-not-stored-in-memory-but-in-tempdb/
Performance wise if you are dealing with millions of records then TempTable is ideal, as you can create explicit indexes on top of them. But if there are less records then TableVariables are good suited.
On Tables Variable explicit index are not allowed, if you define a PK column, then a Clustered Index will be created automatically.
But it also depends upon specific scenarios you are dealing with , can you share it?
~manoj | email: http://scr.im/m22g
http://sqlwithmanoj.wordpress.com
MCCA 2011 | My FB Page

Table space not reduce after delete in oracle 10g

Hi..
Based on my system, i have found that my oracle table space did not reduce after the deletion query. Why ?.. Could somebody help me. As your info, I am using oracle 10g.
Thank you,
Baharin

After Delete the table space will not be set free. high water mark will not be reset. to regain the space you need to recognize the objects from which you deleted the data. This can be done in many ways.
1) Move the objects.
Alter table temp move --> optionally tablespace clause can be used. After this you need to rebuild table indexes.
2) With 10g table can be shrinked or reorganize to free the space.
alter table mytable enable row movement;
alter table mytable shrink space;
3) Export/Import
export the objects and drop and recreate with import.

Alter Table Space Autoextend

Hi,
I got an Error like this
"ORA-01630 max # extents (string) reached in temp segment in tablespace string
Cause: A temporary segment tried to extend past MAXEXTENTS."
Is it possible to alter table space to Auto Extend in Oracle 8i With out Shutting down the
Database. What Exact Commands for this? Is this effect the performance of the database?
Please reply
With thanks Naseer

user13098327 wrote:
Hi,
I got an Error like this
"ORA-01630 max # extents (string) reached in temp segment in tablespace string
Cause: A temporary segment tried to extend past MAXEXTENTS."
Is it possible to alter table space to Auto Extend in Oracle 8i With out Shutting down the
Database. What Exact Commands for this? Is this effect the performance of the database?
Please reply
With thanks NaseerThe error you hit and your request is something different:
ORA-01630 - limitation of extents per object or per tablespace.
Tablespace autoextend - May be you mean datafile autoextend option.
Pls, specify.

Shrinking Undo Table Space

Dear All,
Size of my Undo table space file has been more than 6GB. I am using Oracle 11g. How can I shrink the size of undo tablespace? Would it cause any problems for the Database?
Thanks

Dear Laura,
Its brings back following output:
SYSTEM     LOCAL
SYSAUX     LOCAL
UNDOTBS1     LOCAL
TEMP      LOCAL
USERS     LOCAL
When I try to shrink the undo tablespace I use the following command and out put message:
SQL> ALTER TABLESPACE undotbs1 SHRINK SPACE KEEP 1000M;
ALTER TABLESPACE undotbs1 SHRINK SPACE KEEP 1000M
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-12916: cannot shrink permanent or dictionary managed tablespace

Migrating from Informix 9.21 to Oracle 9.2.0.4(Using Existing Tables space)

Hi
I want to create tables & indexes on different tablespaces as planned. I have already created table spaces using OEM. (for a given schema different set of tables have to be created on diffrent tablespaces and so on)
But,it appears,"OMWB Table Space Discoverer" is not much of useful. It allows to specify one for tables, one for indexes and TEMP. Is there anyway I can 'discover' all the tablespaces from the target and assign the tables & indexes to various tablespaces as planned.
Any suggestions?
Rgds
Jeya

Hi,
I was unable to reproduce your problem. I carried out the following steps in attempt to replicate the issue:
1. I launched the workbench, version 10.1.0.2, selecting the Oracle Lite "Default Repository".
2. Using the Oracle Enterprise Manager Console, I created a user "rtdb" with the password "rtdb" on my target Oracle 9i database.
3. I captured a test Informix database, generating its source and oracle models.
4. I then proceeded to migrate the database to Oracle and supplied my target Oracle9i database information in the "Migration Wizard, Step 1 of 4: Destination Database Details", supplying rtdb/rtdb as the username/password.
5. My test database migrated with no such error messages reported.
If you carried out the migration steps as I have outlined above, and are still experiencing issues with a "Failed to connect" error, I would contact support.
Regards,
Hilary

List size of table spaces

Hello,
I would like to list the name and size of table spaces and also extend them if they are almost filled. Since I'm more familiar with T/SQL I would greatly appreciate your help

SQL> select u.tblspc "TBLSPC", a.fbytes "ALLOC", u.ebytes USED, a.fbytes-u.ebytes UNUSED,
2 (u.ebytes/a.fbytes)*100 USEDPCT
3 from (select tablespace_name tblspc, sum(bytes) ebytes
4 from sys.dba_extents
5 group by tablespace_name) u,
6 (select tablespace_name tblspc, sum(bytes) fbytes
7 from sys.dba_data_files
8 group by tablespace_name) a
9 where u.tblspc = a.tblspc
10 ;
TBLSPC ALLOC USED UNUSED USEDPCT
CARTEST_DATA 891289600 488701952 402587648 54,8308824
CARTEST_IDX 83886080 46465024 37421056 55,390625
CARTMPTEST_DATA 41943040 26935296 15007744 64,21875
RBS 541065216 104857600 436207616 19,379845
SYSTEM 471859200 373547008 98312192 79,1649306
TEMP 209715200 58654720 151060480 27,96875
6 rows selected.
SQL>
Joel P�rez

Multiple users accessing the same data in a global temp table

I have a global temp table (GTT) defined with 'on commit preserve rows'. This table is accessed via a web page using ASP.NET. The application was designed so that every one that accessed the web page could only see their data in the GTT.
We have just realized that the GTT doesn't appear to be empty as new web users use the application. I believe it has something to do with how ASP is connecting to the database. I only see one entry in the V$SESSION view even when multiple users are using the web page. I believe this single V$SESSION entry is causing only one GTT to be available at a time. Each user is inserting into / selecting out of the same GTT and their results are wrong.
I'm the back end Oracle developer at this place and I'm having difficulty translating this issue to the front end ASP team. When this web page is accessed, I need it to start a new session, not reuse an existing session. I want to keep the same connection, but just start a new session... Now I'm losing it.. Like I said, I'm the back end guy and all this web/connection/pooling front end stuff is magic to me.
The GTT isn't going to work unless we get new sessions. How do we do this?
Thanks!

DGS wrote:
I have a global temp table (GTT) defined with 'on commit preserve rows'. This table is accessed via a web page using ASP.NET. The application was designed so that every one that accessed the web page could only see their data in the GTT.
We have just realized that the GTT doesn't appear to be empty as new web users use the application. I believe it has something to do with how ASP is connecting to the database. I only see one entry in the V$SESSION view even when multiple users are using the web page. I believe this single V$SESSION entry is causing only one GTT to be available at a time. Each user is inserting into / selecting out of the same GTT and their results are wrong.
I'm the back end Oracle developer at this place and I'm having difficulty translating this issue to the front end ASP team. When this web page is accessed, I need it to start a new session, not reuse an existing session. I want to keep the same connection, but just start a new session... Now I'm losing it.. Like I said, I'm the back end guy and all this web/connection/pooling front end stuff is magic to me.
The GTT isn't going to work unless we get new sessions. How do we do this?
Thanks!You may want to try changing your GTT to 'ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS' and have the .Net app use a transaction object.
We had a similar problem and I found help in the following thread:
Re: Global temp table problem w/ODP?
All the best.

Temp Tables - Best Practice

Hello,
I have a customer who uses temp tables all over their application.
This customer is a novice and the app has its roots in VB6. We are converting it to .net
I would really like to know the best practice for using temp tables.
I have seen code like this in the app.
CR2.Database.Tables.Item(1).Location = "tempdb.dbo.[##Scott_xwPaySheetDtlForN]"
That seems to work, though i do not know why the full tempdb.dbo.[## is required.
However, when i use this in the new report I am doing I get runtime errors.
i also tried this
CR2.Database.Tables.Item(1).Location = "##Scott_xwPaySheetDtlForN"
I did not get errors, but I was returned data i did not expect.
Before i delve into different ways to do this, i could use some help with a good pattern to use.
thanks

Hi Scott,
Are you using the RDC still? It's not clear but looks like it.
We had an API that could piggy back the HDBC handle in the RDC ( craxdrt.dll ) but that API is no longer available in .NET. Also, the RDC is not supported in .NET since .NET uses the framework and RDC is COM.
Work around is to copy the temp data into a data set and then set location to the data set. There is no way that I know of to get to the tempdb from .NET. Reason being is there is no CR API to set the owner of the table to the user, MS SQL Server locks the tempdb to that user has exclusinve rights on it.
Thank you
Don

Temp table space

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for