The behavior of aggregation of target version

Hi,
New to use Target version. I wonder whether any different behavior of aggregation for target version in comparison to bottom up version?
Thank you in advance.
Casp

Hi,
There is no difference whatsoever in terms of aggregation. However, if you wish to keep target values in parents unchanged after aggregation, you should place SET AGGMISSG OFF; on top of your business rule.
Cheers,
Alp

Similar Messages

How can I programmatically retrieve the CVI Target Version Settings (e.g. File Version, Copyright, etc) in my CVI application?

Is there any way that I can programmatically retrieve the CVI Target Version Settings (e.g. File Version, Copyright, etc) in my CVI application?
I am using LabWindows/CVI version 7.0.
The settings that I'd like to retrieve within my application are those that are set under Build | Target Settings... | Version Info...
e.g.
      File Version
    Product Version
    Company Name
    Legal Copyright
Thanks,
Darren
Message Edited by Darren Draper on 01-16-2006 02:03 AM

Well, "File access permission denied" claims for an authorization problem . I suggest you double check file attributes in the project directory: it could be that you have downloaded this example from a CD and the read-only attribute has not been cleared.
The library does not reside in the example folder: as you can see by selecting View >> Show full pathnames in the project window, it should be in ....CVI\sdk\lib folder.
Proud to use LW/CVI from 3.1 on.
My contributions to the Developer Zone Community
If I have helped you, why not giving me a kudos?

Fatal Error: The schema version of the database is from a newer version of WSUS

Hello,
CM2012 R2 RTM on Server2012 R2 RTM with SQL2012 SP1
installed SQL, WSUS and then CM.
When finished adding WSUS, there was a post installation message but I skipped it and continued to CM installation, as suggested on some blogs. WSUS in CM seems to be a real mystery... and there are multiple workarounds and suggestions.
Now my CM is ready to GO. Configured discovery, boundaries. All components appear green OK. My hand shaked when I click on post Deployment message related to WSUS in server manager. So I clicked it. And received: Post Deployment Failed. There is
a path to log file. The error:
Fatal Error: The schema version of the database is from a newer version of WSUS
than currently installed. You must either patch your WSUS server to at least
that version or drop the database. WSUS was installed with SQL DB.
What do you suggest?
Thanks.
Please see full log:
2013-12-01 06:58:24 Postinstall started
2013-12-01 06:58:24 Detected role services: Api, Database, UI, Services
2013-12-01 06:58:24 Start: LoadSettingsFromXml
2013-12-01 06:58:24 Start: GetConfigValue with filename=UpdateServices-Services.xml item=ContentLocal
2013-12-01 06:58:24 Value is true
2013-12-01 06:58:24 End: GetConfigValue
2013-12-01 06:58:24 Start: GetConfigValue with filename=UpdateServices-Services.xml item=ContentDirectory
2013-12-01 06:58:24 Value is D:\sources\wsus
2013-12-01 06:58:24 End: GetConfigValue
2013-12-01 06:58:24 Content directory is D:\sources\wsus
2013-12-01 06:58:24 Start: GetConfigValue with filename=UpdateServices-DB.xml item=InstanceName
2013-12-01 06:58:24 Value is confman
2013-12-01 06:58:24 End: GetConfigValue
2013-12-01 06:58:24 SQL instance name is confman
2013-12-01 06:58:24 End: LoadSettingsFromXml
Post install is starting
2013-12-01 06:58:24 Start: Run
2013-12-01 06:58:24 Fetching WsusAdministratorsSid from registry store
2013-12-01 06:58:24 Value is S-1-5-21-1033354796-2088831985-1429053453-1003
2013-12-01 06:58:24 Fetching WsusReportersSid from registry store
2013-12-01 06:58:24 Value is S-1-5-21-1033354796-2088831985-1429053453-1004
2013-12-01 06:58:25 Configuring content directory...
2013-12-01 06:58:25 Configuring groups...
2013-12-01 06:58:26 Starting group configuration for WSUS Administrators...
2013-12-01 06:58:26 Found group in regsitry, attempting to use it...
2013-12-01 06:58:28 Writing group to registry...
2013-12-01 06:58:28 Finished group creation
2013-12-01 06:58:28 Starting group configuration for WSUS Reporters...
2013-12-01 06:58:28 Found group in regsitry, attempting to use it...
2013-12-01 06:58:28 Writing group to registry...
2013-12-01 06:58:28 Finished group creation
2013-12-01 06:58:28 Configuring permissions...
2013-12-01 06:58:28 Fetching content directory...
2013-12-01 06:58:28 Fetching ContentDir from registry store
2013-12-01 06:58:28 Value is D:\sources\wsus
2013-12-01 06:58:28 Fetching group SIDs...
2013-12-01 06:58:28 Fetching WsusAdministratorsSid from registry store
2013-12-01 06:58:28 Value is S-1-5-21-1033354796-2088831985-1429053453-1003
2013-12-01 06:58:28 Fetching WsusReportersSid from registry store
2013-12-01 06:58:28 Value is S-1-5-21-1033354796-2088831985-1429053453-1004
2013-12-01 06:58:28 Creating group principals...
2013-12-01 06:58:28 Granting directory permissions...
2013-12-01 06:58:28 Granting permissions on content directory...
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Granting registry permissions...
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Granting registry permissions...
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Granting registry permissions...
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Configuring shares...
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Configuring network shares...
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Fetching content directory...
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Fetching ContentDir from registry store
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Value is D:\sources\wsus
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Fetching WSUS admin SID...
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Fetching WsusAdministratorsSid from registry store
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Value is S-1-5-21-1033354796-2088831985-1429053453-1003
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Content directory is local, creating content shares...
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Creating share "UpdateServicesPackages" with path "D:\sources\wsus\UpdateServicesPackages" and description "A network share to be used by client systems for collecting all software packages (usually applications)
published on this WSUS system."
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Deleting existing share...
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Creating share...
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Share successfully created
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Creating share "WsusContent" with path "D:\sources\wsus\WsusContent" and description "A network share to be used by Local Publishing to place published content on this WSUS system."
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Deleting existing share...
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Creating share...
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Share successfully created
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Creating share "WSUSTemp" with path "C:\Program Files\Update Services\LogFiles\WSUSTemp" and description "A network share used by Local Publishing from a Remote WSUS Console Instance."
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Deleting existing share...
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Creating share...
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Share successfully created
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Finished creating content shares
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Stopping service WSUSService
2013-12-01 06:58:29 Stopping service W3SVC
2013-12-01 06:58:32 Configuring database...
2013-12-01 06:58:32 Configuring the database...
2013-12-01 06:58:32 Establishing DB connection...
2013-12-01 06:58:32 Checking to see if database exists...
2013-12-01 06:58:32 Database exists
2013-12-01 06:58:32 Switching database to single user mode...
2013-12-01 06:58:32 Loading install type query...
2013-12-01 06:58:32 DECLARE @currentDBVersion int
DECLARE @scriptMajorVersion int = (9600)
DECLARE @scriptMinorVersion int = (16384)
DECLARE @databaseMajorVersion int
DECLARE @databaseMinorVersion int
DECLARE @databaseBuildNumber nvarchar(10)
IF NOT EXISTS(SELECT * FROM sys.databases WHERE name='SUSDB')
BEGIN
 SELECT 1
END
ELSE
BEGIN
 SET @currentDBVersion = (SELECT SchemaVersion FROM SUSDB.dbo.tbSchemaVersion WHERE ComponentName = 'CoreDB')
 SET @databaseBuildNumber = (SELECT BuildNumber FROM SUSDB.dbo.tbSchemaVersion WHERE ComponentName = 'CoreDB')
 DECLARE @delimiterPosition INT = CHARINDEX('.', @databaseBuildNumber)
 IF (@delimiterPosition = 0)
 BEGIN
 RAISERROR('Invalid schema version number', 16, 1) with nowait
 return
 END
 SET @databaseMajorVersion = SUBSTRING(@databaseBuildNumber, 1, @delimiterPosition - 1)
 SET @databaseMinorVersion = SUBSTRING(@databaseBuildNumber, (@delimiterPosition + 1), (10 - @delimiterPosition))
 IF @currentDBVersion < 926
 BEGIN
 SELECT 3
 END
 ELSE
 BEGIN
 IF (@scriptMajorVersion > @databaseMajorVersion OR
 (@scriptMajorVersion = @databaseMajorVersion AND @scriptMinorVersion > @databaseMinorVersion))
 BEGIN
 SELECT 2
 END
 ELSE IF (@scriptMajorVersion = @databaseMajorVersion AND
 @scriptMinorVersion = @databaseMinorVersion)
 BEGIN
 SELECT 0
 END
 ELSE
 BEGIN
 SELECT 4
 END
 END
END
2013-12-01 06:58:33 Install type is: UnsupportedFuture
2013-12-01 06:58:33 DB is a higher version than the config scripts
2013-12-01 06:58:33 Swtching DB to multi-user mode......
2013-12-01 06:58:33 Finished setting multi-user mode
2013-12-01 06:58:33 Microsoft.UpdateServices.Administration.CommandException: The schema version of the database is from a newer version of WSUS
than currently installed. You must either patch your WSUS server to at least
that version or drop the database.
 at Microsoft.UpdateServices.Administration.ConfigureDB.CheckForUnsupportedVersion(DBInstallType installType, Boolean dbExists)
 at Microsoft.UpdateServices.Administration.ConfigureDB.ConnectToDB()
 at Microsoft.UpdateServices.Administration.ConfigureDB.Configure()
 at Microsoft.UpdateServices.Administration.PostInstall.Run()
 at Microsoft.UpdateServices.Administration.PostInstall.Execute(String[] arguments)
Fatal Error: The schema version of the database is from a newer version of WSUS
than currently installed. You must either patch your WSUS server to at least
that version or drop the database.
"When you hit a wrong note it's the next note that makes it good or bad". Miles Davis

Gerry,
1. I uninstalled WSUS, removed DB, restarted. And reinstall WSUS again. This time MS Management Console of WSUS could not be started. I did it after WSUS was added following your blog pix.
I checked c:\program files\update services, there were couple of missing directories by comparison what was in case when I installed WSUS after SQL but before CM: Tools, Shema, and another A.. something. I saw this issue on NOOB. And people copied these
directories from previous installation.
How we can explain this behavior on RTM version?
Then I uninstalled it again. And give another try... Here I found another interesting thing. Please compare your slide number 5 from your link and attached one. You can see that on Add Roles and Features Wizard page are missing items. Some
of them were found in next screen of my installation (I am using RTM server) but one API and Power shell cmdlets were not listed on final screen before start install. May be those are note important...
I reinstall again... and the MS Management Console fails again. Exactly the same thing that I saw during 2 weeks of trying to make works. Don't see what I can screw up here.
What about missing directories after reinstalling WSUS. Is that normal? And in IIS there is no WSUS.
I don't see here any difficult thing, just simple wizard... But it not works. Second CM server.
What I do wrong here to create a failure of MMC. There is any blog with examples of RTM Server 2012 and CM RTM. All stuff is 2012. So kind of guesses and no precise thing to do...
Sorry for my cry :). The only solution is to call MS and pay $250 for SUCH a trivial thing that not works.
Any help? Please see pics. Can you confirm that you have the same or more directories in Update Services
Thanks.
API and Power Shell Cmdlets feature missed if compare with yours slides.
"When you hit a wrong note it's the next note that makes it good or bad". Miles Davis

Adobe not rendering the current timeline, but a cached version?

Hello!
This is driving me up the wall, and costing me a great deal of time, so any help would be appreciated. Inside my Adobe Premiere project I have a referenced composition from Adobe After Effects. Every now and then I need to tweak the After Effect composition, and when I do the changes instantly show up in Adobe Premiere. This is the behavior I am looking for. When I export everything out to Adobe Encoder for my final render, sometimes the changes don't show up and I end up with an older version of the file. It's as if there is a cashed version someplace that isn't being cleared. Any advice?
Using Creative Cloud 64bit fully updated on a Windows 7 workstation.
-Avotas

Make sure you are not checking the box that says "Use Previews" when you export.

Change to earlier target version and question on combs

Is there a way to change the target version of a form without rebuilding it?
I built some forms targeted at Acrobat 8 because of features used (combs mostly) but the client needs Acrobat 7 compliance (government IT policy).
Also, I tried out the combs in Reader 7 and they seemed to work ok - does anyone know why they're not supposed to be version 7 compliant?

Under the File Menu/Form Properties in the Defaults Tab you can set a target version. If you have added features to the form that are beyond this target version you will see warnings in the Warnings/Report palette. To activate this palette click on Report under the Window menu.
I am going from memory here so the story may not be 100% correct but you will get the idea.
The UI to add the comb to the form was added in Designer 8. The xfa grammar (the part that describes the comb in the xml template) has been available from the beginning. So the interpretation of the grammar to the comb is OK. Previous to version 8 of Designer you had to code the xml by hand (hence the term it is not supported). Make sure you test it but I am sure that it will behave the way you want.

The application was previously deployed with version 'V2.0'

hi am having this error where running my appication am in jdeveloper 11.1.1.6.0,the application was running correct the previous day
IntegratedWebLogicServer startup time: 34045 ms.[Running application on Server Instance IntegratedWebLogicServer...]
IntegratedWebLogicServer started.
[09:32:46 AM] ---- Deployment started. ----
[09:32:46 AM] Target platform is (Weblogic 10.3).
[09:32:46 AM] Retrieving existing application information
[09:32:46 AM] Running dependency analysis...
[09:32:46 AM] Deploying 3 profiles...
[09:32:46 AM] Wrote MAR file to C:\Users\10017134\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.6.38.61.92\o.j2ee\drs\AutoGeneratedMar
[09:32:49 AM] Wrote Web Application Module to C:\Users\10017134\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.6.38.61.92\o.j2ee\drs\ViewControllerWebApp.war
[09:32:49 AM] Info: Namespace '/persdef' is mapped to deploy-target metadata-store-usage 'WebCenterFileMetadataStore' in adf-config.xml but no metadata from the namespace is included in the MAR.
[09:32:49 AM] Info: Any customizations created while running the application will be written to 'C:\Users\10017134\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.6.38.61.92\o.mds.dt\adrs\\AutoGeneratedMar\mds_adrs_writedir'.
[09:32:49 AM] Wrote Enterprise Application Module to C:\Users\10017134\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.6.38.61.92\o.j2ee\drs
[09:32:49 AM] Deploying Application...
<16 Apr 2013 9:32:49 AM> <Error> <Deployer> <BEA-149082> <You cannot deploy application 'j2ee-app' without version. The application was previously deployed with version 'V2.0'.>
<16 Apr 2013 9:32:49 AM> <Warning> <Deployer> <BEA-149124> <Failures were detected while initiating deploy task for application 'j2ee-app'. Error is: '[Deployer:149082]You cannot deploy application 'j2ee-app' without version. The application was previously deployed with version 'V2.0'.'>
[09:32:49 AM] #### Deployment incomplete. ####
[09:32:49 AM] Remote deployment failed (oracle.jdevimpl.deploy.common.Jsr88RemoteDeployer)
#### Cannot run application due to error deploying to IntegratedWebLogicServer.
[Application stopped and undeployed from Server Instance IntegratedWebLogicServer]
i don't what to delete C:\Users\10017134\AppData\Roaming\JDeveloper\system11.1.1.6.38.61.92\DefaultDomain\servers\DefaultServer\logs\Edited by: adf009 on 2013/04/16 10:45 AM

Hi,
Check below link,
Integrated Weblogic is not running Jdeveloper application
Nilum.

Process Management for Standard Target Version

Hi All,
I am newbie to hyperion, I am entering values at parent level by taking version type as "Standard Target", Is this possible to create Process Management for "Standard Target" versions? if yes how? Plz help me.
Regards,
Naresh R

I take it you are talking about planning, process management is for "Bottom Up Versions"
From the docs
"Target versions use top-down budgeting. *Manage Process Tasks are not allowed*, and children of target members must be blank (for example, #MISSING) to enable data input at the top level."
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Setting Target Version in Designer ES Not Working

I am using LiveCycle Designer ES and I save the form target version to Acrobat and Adobe Reader 8.0 or later. However, whenever I open the form in Acrobat I receive the JavaScript Warning Window telling me that "The PDF form requires a new version of Adobe Acrobat....". However it opens in Reader perfectly fine.
Is there a fix for this?

Thanks. Designer generates a PDF version 1.7 for the target versions 8.0 and 8.1. Acrobat is able to tell the difference from the xfa template version. So an xfa template version of 2.5 is 8.0 compatible while 2.6 is 8.1 compatible. The xfa template of your form is 2.6 therefore Acrobat thinks its an 8.1 compatible form. <template xmlns:xfa="http://www.xfa.org/schema/xfa-template/2.1/" xmlns="http://www.xfa.org/schema/xfa-template/2.6/"> The xfa template is set based on the target version. However, it will be bumped up if the form contains features not supported by the target version. So to fix your problem, you need to find out which xfa 2.6 feature the form is using and disable it. See if there is any target version warnings in the Report palette. Does that help solve your problem? Hélène Adobe Systems

After I chose a color with the eye dropper tool, the filler fills in a grayer version of the color, for some reason.

I have CS3 and after I chose a color with the eye dropper tool, the filler fills in a grayer version of the color for some reason. Everything was fine till I accidentally picked the color sampler tool instead of the eye dropper tool. I undid that, but then after that everything with the regular eye dropper tool and the fill tool got messed up. How can I fix it?

Sorry, I am new to the forum, and a novice with not much knowledge about computers. Sorry if some terms that I use here may not be entirely correct, as I am ignorant of terms of the trade. My Operating system is Mac 10.6.8. I am using Photoshop 10.0.1. I am doing a many layered color RGB setting artwork from scanned and photo images, 8 bits/channel. I have been working on this project for a month without any problems. I was using the eye dropper tool. I selected a color in my artwork and it showed up in the background color box, in the tools window, as a match from the sample that I had taken. Then I selected an area, with the lasso tool, and I accidentally picked the tool called "color sample tool", that puts a little target on the sample area and then a box pops up with numbers that move when the tool moves. That wasn't what I wanted, so I got out of there and chose the eye dropper, I selected the color, it looked good in the box in the tools window, but then when I went up to the fill command and chose fill ( which was set at 100%). I filled the selection, but it was not the color I chose that is in box, it was a grayed and lightened version of the one that I chose. I checked the layers setting and the opacity and fill were at 100%, as was the fill setting. I can't figure out what is making it not fill in the color that is chosen in the tools color window. Does anyone on this forum have an idea of what might be happening and how to fix it?

Invalid/unnecessary CORR documents created when copying to target version

Hi,
we recently discovered a large amount of inexplicable and unnecessary CORR documents in our target system V110. This is the summary of my investigation:
Invalid CORR journals:
In our foreign currency companies, the system creates reversing and non-reversing CORR journals in the target system V110 after the copy task
ran. The journals contain unexplicable amounts and posts to items and
ttypes that were not used in the source system V100. This creates
incorrect values in the target system. Does anybody know what is causing the creation of
those CORR journals and how can they be stopped?
Unnecessary CORR journals:
The system posts a reversing CORR journal in the target system due to a
difference between the source and target system. But even when the
difference is corrected in the source system it still continues to post
the CORR journal each month as reversing indefinately. Does anybody know why the
system is posting this CORR journal as reversing instead of non-reversing
and how can we stop those CORR journals from being posted after the
correction the the source system is done?
Your help would be very much appreciated : )

Hi Tanja,
I saw these CORR records many times during copy process.
One of the explanations:
Copying into Another Group Currency
To copy into another group currency, enter a currency translation method in Customizing for the copy method that is to use a rounding method. When performing a copy task, the system carries out the currency translation specified in the copy method.
The copy task consists of the following steps:
       1.      Read source data
       2.      Execute mapping (if defined)
       3.      Execute the BAdI (if defined)
       4.      Currency translation and rounding according to the currency translation method
       5.      Write target data in the target version
When totals data is copied, rounding differences can cause additional data rows. When documents are copied, additional document line items can be created.
If you periodically copy data (that is not accumulated), you can create the opening balances by copying the associated totals records one time only using the nonperiodic copy function .
If you copy the totals records cumulatively and copy documents at the same time, the system behaves as follows:
●      Totals records and documents are translated separately. However, documents are always translated periodically.
●      Then the system compares the translated totals records with the sum of the translated documents. Here, the translation of totals records takes precedence.
If a difference is found, the system creates a correction document. The document text denotes that this is a correction document. The correction document is also listed in the copy task log.
When data is translated into another group currency, the copy task log shows the following in addition to the ordinary information:
●      In the source data section: the group currency key of the source version
●      Error messages generated during currency translation
●      In the target data section: rounding differences
●      Correction documents (if created)
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/43/7c91ea3c087101e10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm
Correction document is a CORR one.

Target version in LC Defult tab Form Properties

Hi ,
Curently i am using Live cycle Designer Version - 8.2 . I want to support Adobe Reader 4 or later version .but in the default tab under form properties target version drop down is from adobe reader 6.0. or later upto adobe reader 9.0. or later .
What should i do to support version 4.0 or later PDF .
Thanks in Advance .
Regards,
Dhiyane

Hi,
You can get the XFA specifications here: http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/xml/index_arch.html
You will see that XFA Specification 2.0 was draft for Acrobat 6 and only became fully supported as XFA Specification 2.2 in Acrobat 7.
It relates to XML forms, which as far as I can see, did not exist in that format before XFA Specification 2.0.
Hope that helps,
Niall

Adobe LiveCycle Form Properties Target Version Issue

Hello,
I created forms with javascript, which it manipulate the form base upon users selection on different drop downs. I have set the form target version to "Acrobat and Adobe Reader 7.0.5 and above" but there are user using Adobe Reader 7.0.9 and 7.1.0 are experiencing problems. The form were either not working properly or unable to save their data. I did enabled "Extended Features on Adobe Reader" on Acrobat Pro 9. I tried to set target version to "Acrobat and Adobe Reader 6.0.2 and above" but the form will not work at all. The form works fine on Adobe Reader 8 and 9. Thanks in advance.

Paul,
I just have another user experiencing problems. I double checked their Adobe Reader version, which is 7.0.9. The issue they are having is that they can load, fill and save form fine but when they edit the saved form, they can't. Do you have any idea why they couldn't edit the saved form even I have already enable that feature?

I have the latest version of Pages installed, yet there are documents I try to open and the message "you need a newer version of Pages to open this document". Help?

When I try to open some of my documents, the message "you need a newer version of Pages" appears; yet, I have installed the latest/newest version. How do I clear this up? Thanks.

You have 2 versions of Pages on your Mac.
Pages 5.2 is in your Applications folder.
Pages '09/'08 is in your Applications/iWork folder.
You are alternately opening the wrong versions.
Pages '09/'08 can not open Pages 5 files and you will get the warning that you need a newer version.
Pages 5.01 can not open Pages 5.2 files and you will get the warning that you need a newer version.
Pages 5.2 can open Pages '09 files but may damage/alter them. It can not open Pages '08 files at all.
Once opened and saved in Pages 5 the Pages '09 files can not be opened in Pages '09.
Once opened and saved in Pages 5.2 files can not be opened in Pages 5.
Anything that is saved to iCloud is also converted to Pages 5 files.
All Pages files no matter what version and incompatibility have the same extension .pages.
Pages 5 files are now only compatible with themselves on a very restricted set of hardware, software and Operating Systems and will not transfer correctly on any other server software than iCloud.
Apple has removed over 95 features from Pages 5 and added many bugs:
http://www.freeforum101.com/iworktipsntrick/viewforum.php?f=22&sid=3527487677f0c 6fa05b6297cd00f8eb9&mforum=iworktipsntrick
Archive/trash Pages 5, after exporting all Pages 5 files to Pages '09 or Word .docx, and rate/review it in the App Store, then get back to work.
Peter

Hi - I am looking for the Adobe Illustrator 2014 1.2 (or .0.2) bugfix update for Mac - and it is not visible in the Adobe Creative Cloud Packager (Mac version). The only update visible is Illustrator CC 2014.1 - which is what introduced the bugs.

Hi - I am looking for the Adobe Illustrator 2014 1.2 (or .0.2) bugfix update for Mac - and it is not visible in the Adobe Creative Cloud Packager (Mac version). The only update visible is Illustrator CC 2014.1 - which is what introduced the bugs.
The only thing that I can think of that might be causing the issues that I have a Mac Mini on Mavericks.
Dave

Hi
I have discovered that my question above is a non-question. A user triggered by looking at the below article about Illustrator 2014 cc 17.0.2
http://helpx.adobe.com/illustrator/release-note/illustrator-17-0-2-release-notes.html
He had recently upgraded from wht we now know is 18.0 to 18.1 which is the latest version. He read the above artic
le and supposed that it was a bug fix release for his version - because the v17 ov18 number is not often displayed. It is usually just 2014 CC.
I have asked him to post a bug report about Adobe Illustrator CC 2014.1
Dave

How do I use the brush to paint in latest version of Photoshop CC ? I have a MAC with OS 10.10.2

How do I use the brush to paint in latest version of Photoshop CC ? I have a MAC with OS 10.10.2.
I clicked the brush tool, then clicked on color swatch that brought me to the colors and clicked OL... but not able to get the color I need.

Well if I follow him, he creates an Exposure Adjustment Layer.
Then he cranks up the Exposure, lightening the entire body, which he does not want. It's only the head.
So leaving the Exposure set to where he put it, he selects that adjustment layer, clicks on that white thumbnail mask first, then paints
using the brush and black. What this does is "hides" or Masks the exposure effect where he paints, it doesn't paint the picture black.
He finds having to "mask" the entire body a lot of work. So he changes the mask to black by inverting it, and changes the swatch to white.
Then being sure the black mask thumbnail is selected, he paints the head with the white color, punching a hole in the mask so the exposure setting comes through on the face.
Does that make sense?

The behavior of aggregation of target version

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for