The output is always "anonymous block completed"

Hi ,
I have written a simple Stored Procedure as shown :
create or replace procedure display
ename out emp.ename%type
is
begin
select ename into ename from emp where empno='7369';
end;
I tried to execute the above using this block
declare
ename emp.ename%type;
begin
display(ename);
dbms_output.put_line(ename);
end;
I am always getting the Output as "anonymous block completed" and nothing else .
Please help . Thanks .

Hi:
First type this to enable the output.
SET SERVEROUTPUT ON;Saad,

Similar Messages

Anonymous block completed

When I try to run below code, I am getting message says: anonymous block completed. What is this mean?
I think I supposed see whether 'ths oofice is closed today or 'theoffce is open today'as the output,,, what is worng in this code?
Declare
v_day_of_week varchar(30);
Begin
v_day_of_week := To_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'DY');
If(v_day_of_week in ('SAT', 'SUN')) THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('The office is closed today');
Else
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUt_LINE('The office open today');
end if;
End;

In Oracle SQL Developer, there is a DBMS_OUTPUT-tab in the SQL Worksheet. The left most icon (that text-balloon thing) is a toggle to set serveroutput on and off.
Running (F5 - Run Script) you anonymous block will give you the results as expected.

What is "anonymous block completed" ?

I run the following package in sql developer but always come out " anonymous block completed"
I would like to what is "anonymous block completed" ? Is it an error? What we need to bear in mind?
BEGIN
PKG_VERIFICATION2.SP_CHK();
END;

Each call to Oracle, returns a return or exit code.
For a successful call, the code ORA-0000 is returned.
Oracle assigned the text message "+ORA-0000: normal, successful completion+" to that code.
Many clients will however use a tad more meaningful messages. If the call was to create a table, the client can display "+Table created+" as the response message. Or "+Table altered+" for an alter table statement.
Likewise, for an anonymous PL/SQL block, the client can respond with a "+anonymous block completed+".

Printing the Package output from Anonymous block

Hi,
I need to call the below package from anonymous block and get the output.
Could you let me know.
I tried using this, but i don't get data.
===========Anonymous Block=====================================================================
declare
var              xxdc.xxdc_sr_log_his_pkg.sr_tbl_type;
l_sr_idx_bi BINARY_INTEGER := 0;
BEGIN
xxdc.xxdc_sr_log_his_pkg.service_record('14040',var);
dbms_output.put_line('CLAIM_CREDIT_OFFERS :'||var(l_sr_idx_bi).qa_credit_offers(l_sr_idx_bi).character1 );
end;
=============================================================================================
============================================================================================
Package Spec
TYPE cr_offer_type IS TABLE OF apps.qa_results_v%ROWTYPE
INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
TYPE sr_rec_type IS RECORD
(task_status                      apps.jtf_task_statuses_tl.name%TYPE
,task_type                        apps.jtf_task_types_tl.name%TYPE
,qa_credit_offers                 cr_offer_type
TYPE sr_tbl_type IS TABLE OF sr_rec_type
INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
PROCEDURE service_record(p_service_req_num IN VARCHAR2
                                           ,p_service_req_tbl OUT sr_tbl_type
Package Body
       FOR emp_row_rec IN cur_credit_off
       LOOP
         l_sr_tbl(l_sr_idx_bi).qa_credit_offers(l_sr_idx_bi).character1 := emp_row_rec.character1;
         --dbms_output.put_line( l_sr_tbl(l_sr_idx_bi).qa_credit_offers(l_sr_idx_bi).character1);   --commenting for testing
          l_sr_idx_bi := l_sr_idx_bi + 1;
       END LOOP;
      p_service_req_tbl := l_sr_tbl;
=============================================================================================
Thank

Hi,
Did you issue the SQL*Plus command
SET SERVEROUTPUT ON
or, if you're using some other front end, its equivalent?
Can you ever see output from dbms_output? For example, what happens when you run this?
SET SERVEROUTPUT ON
BEGIN
    dbms_output.put_line ('Hello, world!');
END;
Since I don't have your tables, I can't actually run your code. If you'd post CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements, or re-write the package to reference commonly available tables, such as those in the scott schema, then I could test it.

Unexpected result with select max(colmn) in anonymous block

Hi
The following query gives me 28,800 as sum(sal)
SELECT SUM(salary)
FROM employees
    WHERE department_id =60
O/P is : 28800But when i use the above query in anonymous block it gives me 684400
DECLARE
v_sum_sal NUMBER;
department_id employees.department_id%TYPE := 60;
BEGIN
    dbms_output.put_line ('The department_id is'||department_id);
   SELECT SUM(salary)
      into v_sum_sal
    FROM employees
    WHERE department_id = department_id ;
   dbms_output.put_line ('The sum of sal is'||v_sum_sal);
END;The above output statements gives me 684400 as output.. But the expected is 28800
Could you please hint me why the output differs in anonymous block

Smile wrote:
Hi
The following query gives me 28,800 as sum(sal)
SELECT SUM(salary)
FROM employees
WHERE department_id =60
O/P is : 28800But when i use the above query in anonymous block it gives me 684400
DECLARE
v_sum_sal NUMBER;
department_id employees.department_id%TYPE := 60;
BEGIN
dbms_output.put_line ('The department_id is'||department_id);
SELECT SUM(salary)
into v_sum_sal
FROM employees
WHERE department_id = department_id ;
dbms_output.put_line ('The sum of sal is'||v_sum_sal);
END;The above output statements gives me 684400 as output.. But the expected is 28800
Could you please hint me why the output differs in anonymous blockBecause you've made the mistake of having the same name for your column and your variable.
department_id is taken to be the column on both sides of the equality in your query - so it's picking up all rows.

Changing Oracle Passwords through HTML DB anonymous blocks

I am attempting to use DAD as my authentication method. The site will only be accessible through an SSL connection, so I'm not too worried about security. Plus it is a small target audience. I don't want to mess with LDAP because of the unnecessary complexity of adding it just for a single application. One of the requirements is changing passwords through the application. I always get an ORA-01935 (missing user or role name). Any ideas?

Just a note, I get this from an after submit process that executes the following pl/sql anonymous block:
begin
execute immediate 'alter user :P9_USERNAME identified by :P9_PASSWORD1';
exception
when others then
raise_application_error(-20911, 'Could not change password for user: ' || :P9_USERNAME || ' ' || SQLERRM);
end;

Can select resource content in anonymous block, but not in stored procedure

I know the problem relates to the ACLs but am curious about the following behaviour:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Prod
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.1.0 Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
running on Windows XP sp2
Trying to access an existing resource '/home/test/test.dtd'
/home is owned by SYS
/home/test is owned by me
/home/test.test.dtd is owned by me
The following SQL and anonymous block retrieve the content of the resource:
select extract(p.res,'/*').getClobVal()
from resource_view p
where p.any_path = '/home/test/test.dtd'
declare
alldata clob;
begin
select extract(p.res,'/*').getClobVal()
into alldata
from resource_view p
where p.any_path = '/home/test/test.dtd'
dbms_output.put_line(substr(alldata, 1, 255));
end;
BUT when I encapsulate the anonymous block in a stored procedure, I am told that the folder '/home/test/' does not exist.
As said, the problem related to the ACL on the folders, what I cannot understand, and caused me considerable confusion, is why I was unable to get the content from a stored procedure when I was able to do so from an anonymous block.
regards
Richard

Use equals_path(res,'/home/test/test.dtd') = 1OK, OK, but how do you use wildcards (if you want to) since any_path like '/home/test%' works?
Who was the stored procedure owned by. Was it a stand-alone stored procedure or a
method on a package. If it was a method on a package is it AUTHID creator or AUTHID
definer.Everything apart from the '/home' folder is owned by the current user.
The PL/SQL was in a packaged procedure, a stand-alone stored procedure, and an anonymous block. It exhibited the same behaviour in each. All were defined with default AUTHID which is definers rights which is the same as the current user in this case.

Block the output in R/3 if order is not compliant

Hello All
We are currently implementing SAP GTS compliance module. To integrated SAP GTS with the rest of the solution, we want to block the output for purchase orders and sales orders and the creation of the subsequent document.
For the creation of the subsequent document, there are some SAP notes related to it and it doesn't really create an issue for us
For the output, we are currently struggling to find a correct solution
So far, we had found the oss note 900555 to block the printed output for the Purchase order but how can we do it for the others ?
In addition, I didn't find any solution for the sales orders output ( expecially we hae some EDI messages that we want to block)
Currently we were investigating an other way to do it:
- Send back a user status that we will use as condition to determine the output. We have still some concerns about this solution because it means that by default we should put this user status as "non-compliant" for all the orders and only when the status is sent back from GTS we can execute the output
An issue that raise to me also the developper is that in R/3 the output determination is executed before the first call to GTS.
I hope that some members of the community have better solution which ideally can cover PO and SO with real time call
Thank you in advance
Nicolas

Hello Bastian,
We had the same issue and didn't find something useful to block the outputs completely.
Instead, for EDI Outputs probably you can have an extra text segment added in the idoc structure. And put the document compliant status as Yes/No in that segment. The document status will be available.
But however as we expect, the Outputs cannot be blocked. But atleast notification about the status can be sent to Third party. You can liaise with third party to have a logic implemented to check the status of this field and pass the information to destination.
Regards
Dhilipan

Create Accounting when completed in warning the output is coming in XML

Hello to all,
I am having APPS version 12.1.3 OS version OEL 5.5
my problem is that when i am running Create Accounting concurrent request if it completes in warning the output (view output) is coming in XML in browser where as if its completing normal then the output appears correctly as expected, the output type for create accounting concurrent program is XML.
Please advise / guide me
thanks

Please find below log file details
==============================================================================================
Start of log messages from FND_FILE
06-OCT-2011 10:36:08 - Beginning of the Report
06-OCT-2011 10:36:08 - Starting of the Parent Thread
Starting main program for the source application = 200
06-OCT-2011 10:36:08 - Dynamic conditions built
06-OCT-2011 10:36:08 - Event Applications Determined
06-OCT-2011 10:36:08 - Security Context Set
06-OCT-2011 10:36:08 - Session Identifier Set
06-OCT-2011 10:36:08 - Setup for the ledger and Event applications Read
06-OCT-2011 10:36:08 - executing preaccounting hook
event key = 10-426334
06-OCT-2011 10:36:08 - preaccounting hook executed successfully
06-OCT-2011 10:36:08 - Pre-Accounting steps performed
06-OCT-2011 10:36:08 - Queue Created = XLA.XLA_426334_DOC_Q
06-OCT-2011 10:36:08 - Queue Created = XLA.XLA_426334_COMP_Q
06-OCT-2011 10:36:08 - Queue Started = XLA.XLA_426334_DOC_Q
06-OCT-2011 10:36:08 - Queue Started = XLA.XLA_426334_COMP_Q
06-OCT-2011 10:36:08 - Global Context Initialized
06-OCT-2011 10:36:08 - Calling sequencing batch_init
06-OCT-2011 10:36:08 - Returned from sequencing batch_init
06-OCT-2011 10:36:08 - Begin enqueue
06-OCT-2011 10:36:08 - Ready to Enqueue documents in the queue
06-OCT-2011 10:36:08 - Spawning unit processors
06-OCT-2011 10:36:08 - Unit processors spawned
06-OCT-2011 10:36:36 - Ready to Enqueue documents in the queue
06-OCT-2011 10:36:36 - Ready to Enqueue documents in the queue
06-OCT-2011 10:36:36 - Ready to Enqueue documents in the queue
06-OCT-2011 10:36:36 - Ready to Enqueue documents in the queue
06-OCT-2011 10:36:36 - Enqueueing completed
06-OCT-2011 10:36:36 - Waiting for Unit Processor requests to complete
06-OCT-2011 10:37:06 - Child Threads completed
06-OCT-2011 10:37:06 - Global Context cleared
06-OCT-2011 10:37:06 - Queue stopped = XLA.XLA_426334_DOC_Q
06-OCT-2011 10:37:06 - Queue stopped = XLA.XLA_426334_COMP_Q
06-OCT-2011 10:37:06 - Queue dropped = XLA.XLA_426334_DOC_Q
06-OCT-2011 10:37:06 - Queue dropped = XLA.XLA_426334_COMP_Q
06-OCT-2011 10:37:06 - Calling sequencing batch_exit
06-OCT-2011 10:37:06 - Returned from sequencing batch_exit
06-OCT-2011 10:37:06 - Executed post-accounting routine
06-OCT-2011 10:37:06 - Accounting Program completed successfully
06-OCT-2011 10:37:06 - executing postaccounting hook
event key = 10-426334
06-OCT-2011 10:37:06 - postaccounting hook executed successfully
- Accounting Time = 58.73 secs
- Transfer Time = 0 secs
06-OCT-2011 10:37:06 - End of the Report
End of log messages from FND_FILE
Executing request completion options...
Output file size:
1920
------------- 1) PUBLISH -------------
Beginning post-processing of request 426334 on node M at 06-OCT-2011 10:37:06.
Post-processing of request 426334 failed at 06-OCT-2011 10:39:06 with the error message:
The Output Post-processor is running but has not picked up this request.
No further attempts will be made to post-process this request, and the request will be marked
with Warning status.
Setting the profile option Concurrent: OPP Response Timeout to a higher value may be necessary.
------------- 2) PRINT -------------
Not printing the output of this request because post-processing failed.
Finished executing request completion options.
Concurrent request completed
Current system time is 06-OCT-2011 10:39:06
Edited by: hassanksa on Oct 8, 2011 8:15 AM
Edited by: hassanksa on Oct 8, 2011 8:16 AM

In the output list Repeating one line always when generating query by sq01

Hi,
I have generated a query in sq01 for list material document for movment type 301 (Transfer posting) using below tables :
MSEG          Material No. MATNR, Movt. - BWART, Qty. -MENGE
MKPF          Material doc. field MBLNR
MARC          Stock in Transit UMLMC
some times it is generating the output as i want i.e.
Material document          material no.      qty.     movt.      stock in transit
4001               1xx          1     301     0
4002               2xx          2     301     0
but some time it is repeating the same line in output ie..
Material document          material no.      qty.     movt.      stock in transit
4001               1xx          1     301     0
4001               1xx          1     301     0
4001               1xx          1     301     0
4001               1xx          1     301     0
Please let me know the reason. is there any control in sq01.
Thanks

Yeah it is clear visible that, the same combination might have available in different plants.
So to avoid the duplicate entries, always select all the primary key fields available in all the tables in the output.
If not atleast try restricting based on plant in the selection screen or any possible duplicate entreis.
So add the key fields at Infoset level in SQ02

How come the item value does not come thru via PL/SQL anonymous block?

Hi,
It's a Form with 3 tables -
1) ClinicianProfileTb (with about 40 columns, insert/update via DML),
2) PeopleTb (with about 7 columns, insert/update via PL/SQL anonymous block) and
3) ClinicianPracticeTb (with about 10 columns, insert/update via PL/SQL anonymous block) for after-submit-processes.
So I have several After-Submit-Processes. For some reason, it appears that PeopleId which is supposed to come thru via the 2nd After-Submit-Process (ie: Insert/Update PeopleTb) does not do the way it's supposed to. And when I press "Create" button at the bottom, I got the following error msg:
ORA-01400: cannot insert NULL into ("TEST_0712"."CLINICIANPRACTICETB"."PEOPLEID")
I tried the "debug" mode (via edit page link), but to no avail. (I'm newbie, trying to learn and deliver at the same time :)).
I uploaded the app to apex.oracle.com, if someone could kindly take a look and let me know what goes wrong, it'd be greatly appreciated.
workspace: test_0712
app: 43408 - TEST
user: demo
pswd: demoPswd
Page#21 -> look at the After-Submit-Processes -> in "Insert/Update PeopleTb" it appears that PeopeId does not come thru; thus it cannot be updated to ClinicianProfileTb.PeopleId (allows null) -> and thus cannot be inserted into ClincianPracticeTb.PeopleId (which does NOT allow null). Basically my logic is that in order to create ANY row in ClinicianPracticeTb, BOTH PracticeId AND PeopleId must be present.
Acutally I should have used the PeopeTb as DML (as the driving table) to enforce that PeopleId must be present in order to insert ClinicianProfileTb and ClinicianPracticeTb, but it'd be lots of codes to write to insert/update in ClinicianProfileTb (40 columns).
In addition, does ApEx consider EVERY SINGLE after-submit-process are in ONE transaction for commit/rollback? It appears that it treats all PL/SQL anonymous blocks are in ONE transaction, while Automatic Row Processing (DML) is commited/rolled back on its own?
Thanks much,
Helen

All blocks that do not commit in one of the ways I detailed (and which do not explicitly commit using a commit statement) are part of the transaction started with > the first DML statement issued in any of the page processes and continuing until a commit is issued.Say, there are the following processes in the After-Submit-Processes:
1. Process1 -> Automatic Row Processing (DML)
2. Process2 -> PL/SQL anonymous block
3. Process3 -> PL/SQL anonymous block
Based on what you describe, in the event that if there is no explicit "commit" issued in any of these processes, then an implicit "commit" will be issued at the end of Process3?
Thanks, Scott.
Doreen

Should Output parameters always be declare at the beginning of the Stored Procedure?

Should Output parameters always be declare at the beginning of the Stored Procedure?

Usually input parameters listed first followed by output parameters. This is just a custom, not a requirement.
Blog: How to architect stored procedure parameters?
BOL: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187926.aspx
Kalman Toth Database & OLAP Architect
SQL Server 2014 Database Design
New Book / Kindle: Beginner Database Design & SQL Programming Using Microsoft SQL Server 2014

A download, iPhoto, Version 9.4.2, released November 2012; has been on my download page for three weeks. Despite a half dozen attempts to install it, it has never completed the download. Near the end it always says an error has occurred. What can I do?

A download, iPhoto, Version 9.4.2, released November 2012; has been on my download page for three weeks. Despite a half dozen attempts to install it, it has never completed the download. Near the end it always says an error has occurred. What can I do? The unit onto/into which I am attempting to install this is a new MacBook Air.
thank you.
Otto

Thanks LN.
I tried. It would not download. A drop down notice said an error had occurred and to return to the purchase page; which I have done on numerous occasions. (What I am to do on the purchase page I am not sure, other than to click on purchases and see that the same iPhoto download is available. By the way, this was not purchased. It just showed up with two other items free items, which did download nicely.)
Otto

TS3212 I have removed my pop-up blocker completely and still receive the following error message when attempting to download iTunes: "The file was blocked because it does not have a valid digital signature that verifies its publisher".....any ideas?

have removed my pop-up blocker completely and still receive the following error message when attempting to download iTunes: "The file was blocked because it does not have a valid digital signature that verifies its publisher".....any ideas?

That suggests that the installer is getting damaged during the download.
I'd first try downloading an installer from the Apple website using a different web browser:
http://www.apple.com/itunes/download/
If you use Firefox instead of IE for the download (or vice versa), do you get a working installer?

Customize the Anonymous Block.

Hi All,
DB - Oracle 9.2.0.1.0
With the help of you Guys , I am able to create the Anonymous block.But, In the following BLOCK, I need to add One more functionality, if someone needs to grant "create view" privilge inside the block , then the massage should be " No direct grant allowed, this should be assigned to role. Also, is there any alternate, where we can achieve the same effect without using Associative
DECLARE
v_need_to_assign VARCHAR2(30) := '&ENTER PRIVILEGE ASSIGN';
v_user varchar2(30) := '&USER';
TYPE t_list IS TABLE OF NUMBER INDEX BY VARCHAR2(30);
v_list t_list;
v_chk NUMBER;
e_fail_drop EXCEPTION;
BEGIN
v_list('SYSDBA') := 1;
v_list('CREATE SESSION') := 1;
BEGIN
v_chk := v_list(v_need_to_assign);
RAISE_APPLICATION_ERROR(-20001,'PRIVELEGE '||v_need_to_assign||' is not allowed to be grant');
EXCEPTION
WHEN NO_DATA_FOUND THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Privilege ' || v_need_to_assign|| ' Granted');
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'GRANT '||v_need_to_assign || ' to ' || v_user;
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('THE PRIVELEGE '||v_need_to_assign || ' HAS BEEN GRANTED TO ' || v_user) ;
END;
END;
hare krishna

I would appriciate, if you could offer your suggestions on this.
hare krishna
Alok

The output is always "anonymous block completed"

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for