Block the output in R/3 if order is not compliant

Hello All
We are currently implementing SAP GTS compliance module. To integrated SAP GTS with the rest of the solution, we want to block the output for purchase orders and sales orders and the creation of the subsequent document.
For the creation of the subsequent document, there are some SAP notes related to it and it doesn't really create an issue for us
For the output, we are currently struggling to find a correct solution
So far, we had found the oss note 900555 to block the printed output for the Purchase order but how can we do it for the others ?
In addition, I didn't find any solution for the sales orders output ( expecially we hae some EDI messages that we want to block)
Currently we were investigating an other way to do it:
- Send back a user status that we will use as condition to determine the output. We have still some concerns about this solution because it means that by default we should put this user status as "non-compliant" for all the orders and only when the status is sent back from GTS we can execute the output
An issue that raise to me also the developper is that in R/3 the output determination is executed before the first call to GTS.
I hope that some members of the community have better solution which ideally can cover PO and SO with real time call
Thank you in advance
Nicolas

Hello Bastian,
We had the same issue and didn't find something useful to block the outputs completely.
Instead, for EDI Outputs probably you can have an extra text segment added in the idoc structure. And put the document compliant status as Yes/No in that segment. The document status will be available.
But however as we expect, the Outputs cannot be blocked. But atleast notification about the status can be sent to Third party. You can liaise with third party to have a logic implemented to check the status of this field and pass the information to destination.
Regards
Dhilipan

Similar Messages

The Output Post-processor is running but has not picked up this request

Hi
We are getting the following error when running an XML Publisher report in 11.5.10
The Output Post-processor is running but has not picked up this request.
We have checked that the SQL query in the data template works fine. Also, the XML output if we remove the template looks fine. The XML data and template also work fine when merged manually in MS WORD, and also if we create a Java class and run the XDO classes explicitly.
In Manage Concurrent Managers, the OPP seems to be running fine.
How can we debug this issue in an acceptance test environment without sysadmin access?
The problem does not occur in other enviroments.
I think this is not the error described in MetaLink Note 352518.1. This is the ONLY XML Publisher report in the system, so the OPP cannot be busy with other reports, and it is not giving the processing timeout error message (so case 2 is out of question).
Message was edited by:
TyskJohan

You can change the logging level of the OPP to statement to see more detail in the log file
(One problem we have is if you are running of a shared APPL-TOP environement where the conc manager job has to run on the physical node)

The output file for your concurrent request is not initialized

Application: Application Object Library(FND)
Component Type: SERVICE_INSTANCE
Component Name: Standard Manager(STANDARD)
/*The output file for your concurrent request is not initialized.
Cause: Your concurrent program execution was not preceded by calls to standard
Application Object Library routines to initialize concurrent processing. FDPFOP
received a return code of failure.
Action: Change your concurrent program to initialize files by calling standard
Application Object Library routines. */
I got the mail with the above message from System ( Oracle Applicaitons Release 12.1.1)
I have checked the following metalink document
The Output File For Your Concurrent Request is Not Initialized: FDPFOP received a return code of failure [ID 296830.1]
I can not undestand, why the alert sends mail?
Could you please let me know..what happened to standard manager? how to resolve the above issue? why the above alert happened?
The above meatlink note did not help much....

Hi;
>
/*The output file for your concurrent request is not initialized.
Cause: Your concurrent program execution was not preceded by calls to standard
Application Object Library routines to initialize concurrent processing. FDPFOP
received a return code of failure.
Action: Change your concurrent program to initialize files by calling standard
Application Object Library routines. */
The Output File For Your Concurrent Request is Not Initialized: FDPFOP received a return code of failure [ID 296830.1]
I can not undestand, why the alert sends mail? Could you please let me know..what happened to standard manager? how to resolve the above issue? why the above alert happened?I checked related note and it mention its internal bug which mean we cant say too many thing about issue.
The above meatlink note did not help much....It helped or not? Issue still appear or not?
Please run adadmin utulity >> from Maintain Applications Files>> Relink Applications programs
Be sure it wont through any error message than retest issue
Regard
Helios

Block the processing of payroll for employees who do not have IT0185 ST01

Hi People.
I have a client requirement that payroll should be processed only for those persons for whom ID number (IT0185-ST01) is available. I am trying to do it for Portugal Payroll.
I activated P0185 function in PE04 for Portugal and created 2 rules:
*ZH01 Verifica existência do IT0185*
*TABLEP0185 Ler campos de tabela*
*" VARGBSUBTY Campo tab.VVVVV ArgV*
*" 01*
*NUM=1 Definir*
*ADDWT&0185 VAR tab.variáveis*
and...
*ZH02 Verifica existência do IT0185 Subtipo 01*
*NUM=& 0185 Definir*
*" NUM?0 Comparação*
*ZERO=&0185 Definir VVVV p/zero*
*" =*
*ERROR Cancel.processamento*
And I put the rules in sequence in the scheme. But the function P0185 doesn't accept rules.
How do I block the processing of payroll for employees who do not have infotype 0185 subtype 01?
Thanks,
Helio Rabello

if you are not sure about the linking i suggest to just show all roles associated to all the employees,
group by employee
create true/false formula for the role_ids where ONLY your 20 role is TRUE per employee
then exclude all false - that should give you only the employees that are missing that particular role.

How to remove the entries of the names of the previously read PDF files in order to not to leak privacy

How to remove the entries of the names of the previously read PDF files in order to not to leak privacy

Bear in mind that the files will ALSO be in Windows or Mac's recent document list, and even if they weren't, the files will still be around and available. If they are not available, then just the name may not be much of a security bit (unless the file is called my_secret_bid_for_ibm.pdf or some such).

How to block the Statistical delivery date in purchase order from updation

Hello All,
We have the following requirement from our client.
The client wants to track the delay in delivery of purchase orders raised to vendors. Currently the users, change the delivery date and then process the PO if there are any delays. The client wants to STOP this and track any changes being made.
We created a new screen layout for purchase orders and checked the Statistics relevant delivery date as DISPLAY
However, when we tested the same, the statistical delivery date was changed along with delivery date, when the delivery date was changed in the Purchase order, though the option for statistical delivery date was seen a DISPLAY field only.
Please provide us your suggestions on any other options available.
R's
Manoj.

if your client wants to track the delay of a delivery from your vendor, then he has to give the vendor a chance that he can deliver on time. And the usual way to do this is by sending the PO to the vendor.
if you cange the delivery date before output of messagem then your vendor could not even know the original delivery date, so it is not the vendors fault if he cannot meet this date.
if you change the delivery date after output of message , then the statistical delivery date will stay with the old date.
the field is always open to maintain because it is not always the vendor who is reponsible for a delivery date change.
if you want to change the delivery date because you can take the quantity at that date, then it is not the vendors fault, in this case you have to change the statistical delviery date to evaluate the vendors delivery performance against the new date.
And often forgotten in this evaluation process is the warehouse personell that finally posts the goods receipt. if they post it with delay and do not change the goods reeipt date, then the vendor is as well evaluated to bad.

Blocking the Creation of PO in Service Order

Hello SAP folks,
I have got an issue where I have to block the Creation of Purchase Requisation Number(BANFN) which is generated in the background after the creation of the Service order(IW31) I have tried the user exit EXIT_SAPLCOIH_009 but while coding i could'nt trace the field which is holding the value of PR number.Please let me know is it possible to stop the creation of PR if Yes, Please guide me in this issue in terms of coding.
Thanxs in advance.
Regards,
Indira

Hi Indira,
Try these User Exits.
CNEX0013 Order: Cust. enhancement: Default item category comp. a
CNEX0026 Customer enhancement for general inspection of material
CNEX0027 Customer enhancement: Plant, storage loc. finding for c
IWO10004 Maintenance order: Customer check for order completion
IWO10005 Maintenance order: Cust.-specif. determination of profi
IWO10006 Maint. order: Fcode exclusion through cust. enhancement
IWO10007 Maint.order: Customer enhancement - permits in the orde
IWO10008 Cust. enhancement: Determination of tax jurisdiction co
IWO10009 PM Order: Customer Check for 'Save' Event
IWO10010 Maint. order: Cust. enhancement for determining WBS ele
IWO10011 Maint. order: Customer enhancement for component select
IWO10015 Maintenance order: F4 Help for user fields on operation
IWO10016 PM Order: Cust. enhancement to check operation user fie
IWO10017 Determine external order number by customer logic
IWO10018 Maintenance order: User fields on order header
IWO10020 Maintenance order: Automatically include task list
IWO10021 Automatic task list transfer when creating order from n
IWO10022 Determine calendar from user exit
IWO10023 Service order: Change header data for advance shipment
IWO10024 Service order: Changes to items for advance shipment
IWO10025 PM/SM order: Finding responsible cost center
IWO10029 Inclusion of bill of material in PM/SM order
IWO10030 Preset Fields for Event Object
IWO10031 Hide personnel number in PM/SM order
IWO10033 Customer-Specific Authorization Check Maint./Service Or
IWO10034 Operation status based on the status of capacity reqs
Regards,
Vijay

CHANGE THE OUTPUT MEDIUM FOR SRM PURCHASE ORDERS

We are using SRM 5.0
I tried to change the SRM purchase order's output
medium from 'XML' to 'Print' using a function module
'BBP_OUTPUT_PO_PARAMS_SET' within the BADI 'BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI'. Though it changes the
output medium and chooses the right radio button
at the UI interface level (i.e)
Purchase order Header->output->
radio buttons(print,email,fax,xml)
It still holds the output medium as 'XML' at the
Document output log and process the document as 'XML'.
Is there a way to update the output log to hold the changed medium i.e (print)
Thanks and Regards,
Gia

Hi,
Have a look at the foll thread for more pointers;
Re: Change medium of output for Changed PO in SRM
BR,
Disha.
Do reward points for useful answers.

Block the user updating UDF in Production Order

Hi All,
I want to block a particular user updating a UDF in the Production Order. He should not update the UDF only. But ha can update other fields in Production Order. He can add row or delete row or change quantity or change the status. But he should not update the UDF only.
Can anyone help me in how to write a Stored Procedure for this.
Thanks..
Marikannan

Hello,
By standard the Editing feature of UDF can be customized by User.
Open Production Order, and Press CTRLSHIFTB. On the window apperaring is similar to Form settings. You can unmark the Active Flag, and the fields will be read only.
Please note: stored procedure is not a good way, because it is running after the data has been written into the database.
Regards,
J

Block the goods receipt against a purchase order without a record condition

Dear
I need to block migo against a po if FRB1 record condition price have price value 0
I need to block only MIGO not the creation of the purchase order.
How can I do this ?
Thanks.

hi,
Yeah its placed at the item level of the PO, which states wheather GR is possible for it or not...if we uncheck it GR will not be posted...Check Delivery tab in the PO item details...
But in your case you have to go on with condition type...
Regards
Priyanka.P
Edited by: Priyanka Paltanwale on Oct 18, 2010 5:10 PM

Why when I open the output.txt file, is strange code there, not 3.1

i almost copy the example from "think in java book" chapter 11
however, the result "output.txt file" when opened by notepad of windows xp, always only very strange code inside, not what i want
do i need open the file, before i want to write?
or i use a wrong api again?
or the java code norm is very difference from ms windows?
thanks
import java.util.Random;
import java.io.*;
class CreatRandomFile
     public static void main(String args[])throws IOException
          File fileOutput=new File("output.txt");
          DataOutputStream out2=
               new DataOutputStream(
                    new BufferedOutputStream(
                         new FileOutputStream(fileOutput)));
          out2.writeDouble(3.1);
          out2.close();
     }//end main
}//end class

There are basically two ways of IO:
a) human readable format;
b) machine readable format;
What you've just done is writing a double value in machine readable
format to a file. Some folks call it 'binary format'. I bet your file is eight
byes long. A DataOutputStream writes data in machine readable
format. You need a PrintStream instead if you (a being human I suppose)
want to be able to read the contents of that file.
kind regards,
Jos

How to block the material qty to 1 while creating sales order (VA01)?

Hi All,
Scenario : We have 20 Materials each with 100 qty in Plant. In the sales order we should have all the 20 materials with qty one. The sales order should throw an error if the material qty is more than 1 and should not allow to create a sales order.
so is there any transaction code where we can block the entire material qty to 1 from the same plant while creating sales order?
Note: We should not set in MM01 "Minimum order qty". Assume we have 100 material in plant we can't set for each material one by one "minimum order qty".Instead of that is there any option to set the whole material qty to 1 as minimum while creating sales order?
Kindly guide me how to proceed.
Thanks,
Renjith

If you have access to idoc before calling the processing Function module, Adding header text segments E1EDKT1 and E1EDKT2 to the idoc will create the header text.
Regards
Sridhar

Sales Order is not saved when defining a Print output and without Print output it will saved the SO.

Hello,
In VA01 when we create SO and define output type then Sales order is not saved,The error msg will display like " Order is not in the database or is been archived ".
But without defining output type SO will be saved.
So is there any ABAP Developement or enhancement?
Kindly Suggest.
Regards,
Abhishek K.

Hi,
Its something like SD_PARTNER_UPDATE...
Kindly see below screenshot for your reference.
Regards,
Abhishek .K

How to remove spaces in the output of an PL/SQL report

Hi,
The requirement is to develop a SQL report.
The sample code is like this
Select 'Order Number Header Id' from dual; ( This is the heading in the output of the report.)
Select order_number , header_id from oe_order_headers_all;
The output is displaying as follows
=======================
'Order Number Header Id'
1234 101
2222 102
3333 103
=======================
Now I am opening the report in excel, and there is a space appearing after the headings.
So, how can I remove the additional blank line between the headings and the data.
Thanks in advance
Mani

Mani B wrote:
Hi,
The requirement is to develop a SQL report.From which tool ur getting this report...? From oracle forms report..?
>
The sample code is like this
Select 'Order Number Header Id' from dual; ( This is the heading in the output of the report.)
Select order_number , header_id from oe_order_headers_all;
The output is displaying as follows
=======================
'Order Number Header Id'
1234 101
2222 102
3333 103
=======================
Now I am opening the report in excel, and there is a space appearing after the headings. if u use any third party tool like pl/sql developer or sql developer then u can export the data into xcel file.
Sen

How to block the goods receipt of items mentioned in the PO

hi gurus,
My functional people requirement is, when he created a purchase Order of 1000 quantity and I have also done GR for 860 quantity against this PO. he wont be receiving remaining 140 quantity. So in order to avaid that he have checked del completed indicator in PO. But still this PO is allowing me to do GR of the remaining quantity. He got some functional help but he dont want to do taht thing. My question is how should I block the receipt of that quantity which I do not want to receive.
he want me to write exit or badi. so Is there is any EXit or badi to do that
PS: I do not want to change the PO quantity.

change like this .. dup will get avoided
if required do message handling
CALL FUNCTION 'ME_EKPO_SINGLE_READ'
    EXPORTING
      pi_ebeln                  = is_mseg-ebeln
      pi_ebelp                  = is_mseg-ebelp
*   PI_BYPASSING_BUFFER       =
*   PI_REFRESH_BUFFER         =
   IMPORTING
     po_ekpo                   = ls_ekpo
EXCEPTIONS
   NO_RECORDS_FOUND          = 1
   OTHERS                    = 2
IF sy-subrc = 0.
    CHECK ls_ekpo-elikz = 'X'.
    CONCATENATE 'Delivery Already Completed for' 'Line item:' is_mseg-ebelp '-' 'Material:' is_mseg-matnr INTO message_var.
    MESSAGE e002(sy) WITH message_var.
ENDIF.
About the St22 analysis i dont have much idea .. i think so roll back is happening.
May be others can help you regarding this.Try to post it as a new thread so that you will get better answers

Block the output in R/3 if order is not compliant

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for