The question of exporting

I deploy my progam to server.then i run it.when i export my report ,it thow a error.the information for following.
please you help me!!thank you !!
javax.servlet.jsp.JspException: java.lang.IllegalStateException: OutputStream already retrieved
at oracle.dss.addins.jspTags.BIThinSessionTag.doEndTag(BIThinSessionTag.java:206)
at phoneuser_type._jspService(_phoneuser__type.java:123)
[SRC:/phoneuser_type.jsp:10]
at com.orionserver[Oracle9iAS (9.0.2.0.0) Containers for J2EE].http.OrionHttpJspPage.service(OrionHttpJspPage.java:56)
at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspPageTable.service(JspPageTable.java:302)
at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspServlet.internalService(JspServlet.java:407)
at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:330)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:336)
at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.2.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.ResourceFilterChain.doFilter(ResourceFilterChain.java:59)
at oracle.security.jazn.oc4j.JAZNFilter.doFilter(JAZNFilter.java:283)
at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.2.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.invoke(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:523)
at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.2.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.forwardInternal(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:269)
at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.2.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.HttpRequestHandler.processRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:735)
at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.2.0.0) Containers for J2EE].server.http.AJPRequestHandler.run(AJPRequestHandler.java:151)
at com.evermind[Oracle9iAS (9.0.2.0.0) Containers for J2EE].util.ThreadPoolThread.run(ThreadPoolThread.java:64)

Nobody know the method of solving this question?

Similar Messages

  • Again, ask the question of export parameter.

    Again, ask the question of export parameter.
    I wrote a java version transformation and it worked good with export parameter.
    However I can not work it out in graphical message mapping. I refered http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/en/43/c3e1fa6c31599ee10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm.
    In PI7.1, I add an export parameter "EXPORT_PARA" in the "Signature" tab. Are there any special step to assign this parameter to an UDF? I did not find a way to do it.
    And then I define an UDF,
    public String SetExportPara(String sss, Container container) throws StreamTransformationException{
    String str = "GOOD";
    GlobalContainer gc = container.getGlobalContainer();
    OutputParameters paras= gc.getOutputParameters();
    if(paras.exists("EXPORT_PARA ") == true) {
    paras.setString("EXPORT_PARA ", str);
    }else {
    str = "NOT FOUND EXPORT_PARA";
    return str;
    And I assign this UDF to one element of my output XML, I tried to run it in IE, it always output "NOT FOUND EXPORT_PARA.
    why?????
    I know there is a blog : https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/8654. [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
    But it did not talk how to set export parameters.

    close this

  • Question, regarding export. From the library module, when I select an image and then click on the Export button, or select file export, nothing happens. The program seems to lock up and the only way to continue in the software is to press the escape key.

    I guess the question is entirely contained in the title. Thank you.

    TO further clarify, after pressing the Export button the dialog box defining the export output does not appear

  • Three questions about the CS4 SDK Exporter

        Hello. I'm working to make an Exporter Plug-In that supports "Pro CS4" and "Elements 8.0" single binary.
        Please give me any advices to complete it. I show you the questions as follows:
    How can I get the slider screen without checkbox (in parameter GUI)
    How to enable an Exporter Plug-In at "Elements 8.0".
    What is the difference between ver.4.0 and ver.4.2 in exExpoterInfoRec.
    Details below.
    1st:
        I tried PrSDKExportParamSuite::AddParam() with exParamFlag_slider and exParamFlag_optional.
        Both cases parameter GUI shows slider with checkbox. Please teach me a method to use simple slider (no checkbox) in parameter GUI.
        BTW, Standard plugins are seem to use "Premiere Export Private Statndar Param Suite". Are you planning to publish it?
    2nd:
        The Premiere Elements 8.0 never shows any additional Exporter Plug-in, including SDK sample (ExporterSDK.prm).
        Please tell me if I need special installation procedures.
    3rd:
        I found that the exExporterInfoRec is difference between 4.0 and 4.2. The exExporterInfoRec[ver. 4.2] is defined in CS4SDK_r1. But I can't find any definition of exExporterInfoRec[ver. 4.0] in the SDK.
        An Exporter Plug-In is build with CS4SDK_r1 never work on the Premiere Pro CS4 (4.0) / Media Encoder CS4 (4.0). I need definition of exExporterInfoRec[ver. 4.0] to support CS4 (ver. 4.0).
    Thanks.

    Below is the definition of the return values in Premiere Elements 8. The red values are unique to Premiere Elements 8, and shifted the subsequent return values 2 values higher than their definition in the Premiere Pro SDK.
    enum
          exportReturn_ErrNone = 0,                 // no error
          exportReturn_Abort,                             // User aborted the compile
          exportReturn_Done,                              // Export finished normally
          exportReturn_InternalError,
          exportReturn_OutputFormatAccept,                // The output format is valid
          exportReturn_OutputFormatDecline,               // The compile module cannot compile to the output format
          exportReturn_OutOfDiskSpace,        // Out of disk space error
          exportReturn_BufferFull,                  // The offset into the audio buffer would overflow it
          exportReturn_ErrOther,                    //
          exportReturn_ErrMemory,                   // ran out of memory
          exportReturn_ErrFileNotFound,       // File not found
          exportReturn_ErrTooManyOpenFiles,   // Too many open files
          exportReturn_ErrPermErr,                  // Permission violation
          exportReturn_ErrOpenErr,                  // Unable to open the file
          exportReturn_ErrInvalidDrive,       // Drive isn't valid.
          exportReturn_ErrDupFile,                  // Duplicate Filename
          exportReturn_ErrIo,                             // File io error
          exportReturn_ErrInUse,                    // File is in use
          exportReturn_IterateExporter,       // Return value from exSelStartup to request Exporter iteration
          exportReturn_IterateExporterDone,   // Return value from exSelStartup to indicate there are no more Exporters
          exportReturn_InternalErrorSilent,   /*    Silent error code; host application will not display an error message on screen.
                                                                      Exporters can return this error code from compDoCompile if they wish to
                                                                      put their own customized error message on screen just before returning
                                                                      control.  */
          exportReturn_ErrCodecBadInput,            // a video codec refused the input format
          exportReturn_ErrLastErrorSet,       // the Exporter had an error and set a display string for it using the PrSDKErrorSuite.
          exportReturn_ErrLastWarningSet,           // the Exporter had an warning and set a display string for it using the PrSDKErrorSuite.
          exportReturn_ErrLastInfoSet,        // the Exporter has an info string to display and set it using the PrSDKErrorSuite.
          exportReturn_ErrExceedsMaxFormatDuration, // the Exporter (or the host) has deemed the duration of the compile to be too large
          exportReturn_VideoCodecNeedsActivation,         // the current video codec is not activated and cannot be used.
          exportReturn_AudioCodecNeedsActivation,         // the current audio codec is not activated and cannot be used.
          exportReturn_IncompatibleAudioChannelType,      // the requested audio channels are not compatible with the source audio
          exportReturn_Unsupported = -100           // Unsupported selector
     Obviously, this wasn't the right way to add these new return values.

  • Hyperion IR 9.3.1 - Issue in printing the report after exporting it to pdf

    Hi All,
    I am facing a problem in printing the report after exporting it to pdf format using Hyperion Interactive Reporting 9.3.1. I have set page size of report section to 11X17 inch landscape. Now I am exporting this report section to pdf. Report gets exported to pdf with size 11X17 inch landsacpe. But when I am trying to print this pdf it is shrinking the documnet size to A4 size paper and printing it rather it should print it on 11X17 inch paper size. Please suggest if there is fix available for this issue.
    Thanks
    Ujjawal

    "File > Print Setup > Paper > Size" on PDF.
    I think this issue is only to do with the printer and not IR.
    I think the question now is "Can your printer print 11X17 pages or not".

  • I have a MacBook Pro (Retina) and a Sony HandyCam DCR-HC48 video Camera. The Sony only exports video via Firewire, which is not available on the Mac. Is there a firewire to USB or to HDMI adapter?

    I have a MacBook Pro (Retina) and a Sony HandyCam DCR-HC48 video Camera. The Sony only exports video via Firewire, which is not available on the Mac. Is there a firewire to USB or to HDMI adapter?

    tyler57,
    it would be better to direct that question to Gary Loftis, since my MacBook Pro doesn’t have a Thunderbolt port.

  • Hi there, i'm trying to change a PDF document written in arabic to Word document, the problem is (( i can't find the arabic language in adobe )) the question is how to install the arabic language

    hi there, i'm trying to change a PDF document written in arabic to Word document, the problem is (( i can't find the arabic language in adobe )) the question is how to install the arabic language

    <moved from Downloading, Installing, Setting Up to Creating, Editing & Exporting PDFs>

  • A possibly dumb question re exporting clip for web use

    Hi,
    I've been experimenting with diff resolutions etc for exporting a clip intended to be added to a web page. Diff levels of mpeg compression, etc.
    I'm most impressed with the quality of H264, the video codec for the video ipod. I play it in a quicktime player just fine & it looks great. Its a choice in FCP HD 4.5
    The question is, can I make a little clip in H264 & put it on the web? Will web browsers with plug-ins set up to play quicktime files be able to play it? are there any compatibility issues? Windows browsers? etc?
    Thanks
    Duane

    Yes, they are playable on the web. They were able to do that before the video iPod came along, so that was their original intent.
    For others to see it they need to have QT7, and unfortunately many PCs cannot see videos in this format.
    Shane

  • Help required to manipulate the data without exporting the output twice

    I am running a script which export the data to CSV file and I re-import the same file to remove the duplicate rows and them export them.
    Need to clean the up the first file after the script execution
    Is it possible to store the data in an object without export and import for manipulating the data
    &{foreach($role in Get-VIRole){
        Get-VIPrivilege -Role $role -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue |
        Select @{N="Role";E={$role.Name}},@{N="Assigned Privileges";E={$_.ID}}
    }} | Export-Csv C:\Scripts\Permission.CSV -NoTypeInformation -UseCulture 
    &{foreach($row in (Import-Csv C:\Scripts\Permission.CSV -UseCulture)){   
            if($prevRole -and $row.Role -eq $prevRole){
                $role = ""
            Else{
                $role = $prevRole = $row.Role
            New-Object PSObject -Property @{
                Role = $role
               "Assigned privileges" = $row."Assigned Privileges"
        }} | Select "Role","Assigned Privileges" | Export-CSV

    If I understand the question correctly, I think this might work.
    $ht = @{}
    foreach($role in Get-VIRole){
    Get-VIPrivilege -Role $role -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue |
    foreach { $ht[$role.name] = $_.ID }
    $ht.GetEnumerator() |
    foreach {
    New-Object PSObject -Property @{Role=$_.name;'Assigned Privileges' = $_.value}
    } | export-csv
    That uses a hash table to de-dupe the role/assignment pairs and then builds the objects for export from the hash table.
    [string](0..33|%{[char][int](46+("686552495351636652556262185355647068516270555358646562655775 0645570").substring(($_*2),2))})-replace " "

  • HD Upper or lower interlace or not that is the question

    Ok Im a bit confused and cannot seem to get a straight direction on this. I shoot in 30fps 1080i, I capture in HD via firewire, I edit and when outputting for regular DVDs do I encode UPPER FIELD first since the source media is HD or LOWER FIELD first because it is doing to DV.
    When encoding with Media Encoder should I check the deinterlace button when encoding HD for a DV project going to encore or not check it...that is the question.
    Where is my Commedore 64 when I need it?

    Choose the correct field order for your
    export format when exporting, in this case DV.
    Choose progressive/interlaced depending on your export format when exporting. Since DV is interlaced, do not de-interlace.
    Who needs a Commodore 64 when you have a Vic 20! ;)
    Cheers
    Eddie
    PremiereProPedia   (
    RSS feed)
    - Over 300 frequently answered questions
    - Over 250 free tutorials
    - Maintained by editors like
    you
    Forum FAQ

  • What is the best final export Format?

    Hello everybody,
    I just my first short movie using Red Camera. And I made my editing and color correction using Adobe premiere & After effect.
    But, as I am a beginner in editing, I need your help about the exporting format that I can choose to have the final video of the movie.
    I already tried to export in full HD quality (without any compression), but the result, of course, was too much big to be played.
    I exported to H264, but after what I red, it make too much compression and it's made for web streaming.
    I know that DCP would be helpful for a cinema screening, but I want to have a video with the best quality so I can show it to Producers and TV broadcasters.
    So what is the best final export format I can have with adobe premiere Pro?
    Thank you in advance for your answer.   

    The question is HOW do you want to share it with people? Will you email it to them, play it on your laptop or a tablet, website, what? H.264 is a good codec for sharing - it's the same codec used for Blu-ray, so it is NOT a "web quality" necessarily, all depends on the encoding settings used. H.264 is pretty universal as far as playback, versus other formats and codecs.
    Thanks
    Jeff Pulera
    Safe Harbor Computers

  • My i cloud account is locked, the e mail address I used can no longer be accessed and when I click the option to use the questions to get a new password it asked for my ID number, when I input that it tells me its wrong! now what?

    I forgot my i cloud password
    The e mail address i used can no longer be accessed
    To access the questions way, it requires my ID number
    when I input my ID number the response is  ' ID number incorrect! even though I am inputting there correct number
    is there any way i can resolve this?

    Contact the Apple account security team for your country and ask for assistance resetting the password: Apple ID: Contacting Apple for help with Apple ID account security.

  • To RAID or not to RAID, that is the question

    People often ask: Should I raid my disks?
    The question is simple, unfortunately the answer is not. So here I'm going to give you another guide to help you decide when a raid array is advantageous and how to go about it. Notice that this guide also applies to SSD's, with the expection of the parts about mechanical failure.
     What is a RAID?
     RAID is the acronym for "Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks". The concept originated at the University of Berkely in 1987 and was intended to create large storage capacity with smaller disks without the need for very expensive and reliable disks, that were very expensive at that time, often a tenfold of smaller disks. Today prices of hard disks have fallen so much that it often is more attractive to buy a single 1 TB disk than two 500 GB disks. That is the reason that today RAID is often described as "Redundant Array of Independent Disks".
    The idea behind RAID is to have a number of disks co-operate in such a way that it looks like one big disk. Note that 'Spanning' is not in any way comparable to RAID, it is just a way, like inverse partitioning, to extend the base partition to use multiple disks, without changing the method of reading and writing to that extended partition.
     Why use a RAID?
     Now with these lower disks prices today, why would a video editor consider a raid array? There are two reasons:
    1. Redundancy (or security)
    2. Performance
    Notice that it can be a combination of both reasons, it is not an 'either/or' reason.
     Does a video editor need RAID?
    No, if the above two reasons, redundancy and performance are not relevant. Yes if either or both reasons are relevant.
    Re 1. Redundancy
    Every mechanical disk will eventually fail, sometimes on the first day of use, sometimes only after several years of usage. When that happens, all data on that disk are lost and the only solution is to get a new disk and recreate the data from a backup (if you have one) or through tedious and time-consuming work. If that does not bother you and you can spare the time to recreate the data that were lost, then redundancy is not an issue for you. Keep in mind that disk failures often occur at inconvenient moments, on a weekend when the shops are closed and you can't get a replacement disk, or when you have a tight deadline.
    Re 2. Performance
    Opponents of RAID will often say that any modern disk is fast enough for video editing and they are right, but only to a certain extent. As fill rates of disks go up, performance goes down, sometimes by 50%. As the number of disk activities on the disk go up , like accessing (reading or writing) pagefile, media cache, previews, media, project file, output file, performance goes down the drain. The more tracks you have in your project, the more strain is put on your disk. 10 tracks require 10 times the bandwidth of a single track. The more applications you have open, the more your pagefile is used. This is especially apparent on systems with limited memory.
    The following chart shows how fill rates on a single disk will impact performance:
    Remember that I said previously the idea behind RAID is to have a number of disks co-operate in such a way that it looks like one big disk. That means a RAID will not fill up as fast as a single disk and not experience the same performance degradation.
    RAID basics
     Now that we have established the reasons why people may consider RAID, let's have a look at some of the basics.
    Single or Multiple? 
    There are three methods to configure a RAID array: mirroring, striping and parity check. These are called levels and levels are subdivided in single or multiple levels, depending on the method used. A single level RAID0 is striping only and a multiple level RAID15 is a combination of mirroring (1) and parity check (5). Multiple levels are designated by combining two single levels, like a multiple RAID10, which is a combination of single level RAID0 with a single level RAID1.
    Hardware or Software? 
    The difference is quite simple: hardware RAID controllers have their own processor and usually their own cache. Software RAID controllers use the CPU and the RAM on the motherboard. Hardware controllers are faster but also more expensive. For RAID levels without parity check like Raid0, Raid1 and Raid10 software controllers are quite good with a fast PC.
    The common Promise and Highpoint cards are all software controllers that (mis)use the CPU and RAM memory. Real hardware RAID controllers all use their own IOP (I/O Processor) and cache (ever wondered why these hardware controllers are expensive?).
    There are two kinds of software RAID's. One is controlled by the BIOS/drivers (like Promise/Highpoint) and the other is solely OS dependent. The first kind can be booted from, the second one can only be accessed after the OS has started. In performance terms they do not differ significantly.
    For the technically inclined: Cluster size, Block size and Chunk size
     In short: Cluster size applies to the partition and Block or Stripe size applies to the array.
    With a cluster size of 4 KB, data are distributed across the partition in 4 KB parts. Suppose you have a 10 KB file, three full clusters will be occupied: 4 KB - 4 KB - 2 KB. The remaining 2 KB is called slackspace and can not be used by other files. With a block size (stripe) of 64 KB, data are distributed across the array disks in 64 KB parts. Suppose you have a 200 KB file, the first part of 64 KB is located on disk A, the second 64 KB is located on disk B, the third 64 KB is located on disk C and the remaining 8 KB on disk D. Here there is no slackspace, because the block size is subdivided into clusters. When working with audio/video material a large block size is faster than smaller block size. Working with smaller files a smaller block size is preferred.
    Sometimes you have an option to set 'Chunk size', depending on the controller. It is the minimal size of a data request from the controller to a disk in the array and only useful when striping is used. Suppose you have a block size of 16 KB and you want to read a 1 MB file. The controller needs to read 64 times a block of 16 KB. With a chunk size of 32 KB the first two blocks will be read from the first disk, the next two blocks from the next disk, and so on. If the chunk size is 128 KB. the first 8 blocks will be read from the first disk, the next 8 block from the second disk, etcetera. Smaller chunks are advisable with smaller filer, larger chunks are better for larger (audio/video) files.
    RAID Levels
     For a full explanation of various RAID levels, look here: http://www.acnc.com/04_01_00/html
    What are the benefits of each RAID level for video editing and what are the risks and benefits of each level to help you achieve better redundancy and/or better performance? I will try to summarize them below.
    RAID0
     The Band AID of RAID. There is no redundancy! There is a risk of losing all data that is a multiplier of the number of disks in the array. A 2 disk array carries twice the risk over a single disk, a X disk array carries X times the risk of losing it all.
    A RAID0 is perfectly OK for data that you will not worry about if you lose them. Like pagefile, media cache, previews or rendered files. It may be a hassle if you have media files on it, because it requires recapturing, but not the end-of-the-world. It will be disastrous for project files.
    Performance wise a RAID0 is almost X times as fast as a single disk, X being the number of disks in the array.
    RAID1
     The RAID level for the paranoid. It gives no performance gain whatsoever. It gives you redundancy, at the cost of a disk. If you are meticulous about backups and make them all the time, RAID1 may be a better solution, because you can never forget to make a backup, you can restore instantly. Remember backups require a disk as well. This RAID1 level can only be advised for the C drive IMO if you do not have any trust in the reliability of modern-day disks. It is of no use for video editing.
    RAID3
    The RAID level for video editors. There is redundancy! There is only a small performance hit when rebuilding an array after a disk failure due to the dedicated parity disk. There is quite a perfomance gain achieveable, but the drawback is that it requires a hardware controller from Areca. You could do worse, but apart from it being the Rolls-Royce amongst the hardware controllers, it is expensive like the car.
    Performance wise it will achieve around 85% (X-1) on reads and 60% (X-1) on writes over a single disk with X being the number of disks in the array. So with a 6 disk array in RAID3, you get around 0.85x (6-1) = 425% the performance of a single disk on reads and 300% on writes.
    RAID5 & RAID6
     The RAID level for non-video applications with distributed parity. This makes for a somewhat severe hit in performance in case of a disk failure. The double parity in RAID6 makes it ideal for NAS applications.
    The performance gain is slightly lower than with a RAID3. RAID6 requires a dedicated hardware controller, RAID5 can be run on a software controller but the CPU overhead negates to a large extent the performance gain.
    RAID10
     The RAID level for paranoids in a hurry. It delivers the same redundancy as RAID 1, but since it is a multilevel RAID, combined with a RAID0, delivers twice the performance of a single disk at four times the cost, apart from the controller. The main advantage is that you can have two disk failures at the same time without losing data, but what are the chances of that happening?
    RAID30, 50 & 60
     Just striped arrays of RAID 3, 5 or 6 which doubles the speed while keeping redundancy at the same level.
    EXTRAS
     RAID level 0 is striping, RAID level 1 is mirroring and RAID levels 3, 5 & 6 are parity check methods. For parity check methods, dedicated controllers offer the possibility of defining a hot-spare disk. A hot-spare disk is an extra disk that does not belong to the array, but is instantly available to take over from a failed disk in the array. Suppose you have a 6 disk RAID3 array with a single hot-spare disk and assume one disk fails. What happens? The data on the failed disk can be reconstructed in the background, while you keep working with negligeable impact on performance, to the hot-spare. In mere minutes your system is back at the performance level you were before the disk failure. Sometime later you take out the failed drive, replace it for a new drive and define that as the new hot-spare.
    As stated earlier, dedicated hardware controllers use their own IOP and their own cache instead of using the memory on the mobo. The larger the cache on the controller, the better the performance, but the main benefits of cache memory are when handling random R+W activities. For sequential activities, like with video editing it does not pay to use more than 2 GB of cache maximum.
    REDUNDANCY(or security)
    Not using RAID entails the risk of a drive failing and losing all data. The same applies to using RAID0 (or better said AID0), only multiplied by the number of disks in the array.
    RAID1 or 10 overcomes that risk by offering a mirror, an instant backup in case of failure at high cost.
    RAID3, 5 or 6 offers protection for disk failure by reconstructing the lost data in the background (1 disk for RAID3 & 5, 2 disks for RAID6) while continuing your work. This is even enhanced by the use of hot-spares (a double assurance).
    PERFORMANCE
     RAID0 offers the best performance increase over a single disk, followed by RAID3, then RAID5 amd finally RAID6. RAID1 does not offer any performance increase.
    Hardware RAID controllers offer the best performance and the best options (like adjustable block/stripe size and hot-spares), but they are costly.
     SUMMARY
     If you only have 3 or 4 disks in total, forget about RAID. Set them up as individual disks, or the better alternative, get more disks for better redundancy and better performance. What does it cost today to buy an extra disk when compared to the downtime you have when a single disk fails?
    If you have room for at least 4 or more disks, apart from the OS disk, consider a RAID3 if you have an Areca controller, otherwise consider a RAID5.
    If you have even more disks, consider a multilevel array by striping a parity check array to form a RAID30, 50 or 60.
    If you can afford the investment get an Areca controller with battery backup module (BBM) and 2 GB of cache. Avoid as much as possible the use of software raids, especially under Windows if you can.
    RAID, if properly configured will give you added redundancy (or security) to protect you from disk failure while you can continue working and will give you increased performance.
    Look carefully at this chart to see what a properly configured RAID can do to performance and compare it to the earlier single disk chart to see the performance difference, while taking into consideration that you can have one disks (in each array) fail at the same time without data loss:
    Hope this helps in deciding whether RAID is worthwhile for you.
    WARNING: If you have a power outage without a UPS, all bets are off.
    A power outage can destroy the contents of all your disks if you don't have a proper UPS. A BBM may not be sufficient to help in that case.

    Harm,
    thanks for your comment.
    Your understanding  was absolutely right.
    Sorry my mistake its QNAP 639 PRO, populated with 5 1TB, one is empty.
    So for my understanding, in my configuration you suggest NOT to use RAID-0. Im not willing to have more drives in my workstation becouse if my projekts are finished, i archiv on QNAP or archiv on other external drive.
    My only intention is to have as much speed and as much performance as possible during developing a projekt 
    BTW QNAP i also use as media-center in combination with Sony PS3 to run the encoded files.
    For my final understanding:
    C:  i understand
    D: i understand
    E and F: does it mean, when i create a projekt on E, all my captured and project-used MPEG - files should be situated in F?  Or which media in F you mean?
    Following your suggestions in want to rebulid Harms-Best Vista64-Benchmark comp to reach maximum speed and performance. Can i use in general the those hardware components (exept so many HD drives and exept Areca raid controller ) in my drive configuration C to F. Or would you suggest some changings in my situation?

  • After importing a Light Room catalog, the files I export, export smaller than the originals - with every option of file ending.  I want to export them as DNGs but the files are reduced from around 5000 pixels to about 1700 pixels in length.

    Hi All ~ Thanks in advance for your help! 
    I have been on a support chat with Adobe for 2 hours now and they can't figure this out but hopefully one of you can! 
    I exported my files as a LightRoom Catalog
    I zipped the catalog and the smart previews together
    I sent the zipped folder via Dropbox to a photo editor
    Editor edited the photos
    Editor exported the files as a Lightroom Catalog and zipped them
    Editor sent the LR Catalog back to me via Dropbox
    I opened the Lightroom Catalog in LR (the pixel dimensions are the same as the originals)
    I exported the photos as DNG's (which does not allow for any file size changes - I also tried JPGs and the same thing happened)
         Camera Raw 7.1 and later (I tried them all just to see - and they all rendered the same result)
         Embed Fast Load Data (checked on)
         Embed Original Raw File (check on)
    I checked the Pixel dimensions on my exported photos and they are smaller
    The original pixel dimensions are:
    4912x7360 and the new size (after exporting) is: 1709x2560
    But here's the real kicker!  WHEN I UPLOAD A PHOTO TO LIGHTROOM FROM MY COMPUTER DIRECTLY (not from a LR catalog), AND EXPORT THAT FILE, IT EXPORTS AT FULL SIZE with no change in the pixels dimensions!

    Hi All ~ Thanks in advance for your help! 
    I have been on a support chat with Adobe for 2 hours now and they can't figure this out but hopefully one of you can! 
    I exported my files as a LightRoom Catalog
    I zipped the catalog and the smart previews together
    I sent the zipped folder via Dropbox to a photo editor
    Editor edited the photos
    Editor exported the files as a Lightroom Catalog and zipped them
    Editor sent the LR Catalog back to me via Dropbox
    I opened the Lightroom Catalog in LR (the pixel dimensions are the same as the originals)
    I exported the photos as DNG's (which does not allow for any file size changes - I also tried JPGs and the same thing happened)
         Camera Raw 7.1 and later (I tried them all just to see - and they all rendered the same result)
         Embed Fast Load Data (checked on)
         Embed Original Raw File (check on)
    I checked the Pixel dimensions on my exported photos and they are smaller
    The original pixel dimensions are:
    4912x7360 and the new size (after exporting) is: 1709x2560
    But here's the real kicker!  WHEN I UPLOAD A PHOTO TO LIGHTROOM FROM MY COMPUTER DIRECTLY (not from a LR catalog), AND EXPORT THAT FILE, IT EXPORTS AT FULL SIZE with no change in the pixels dimensions!

  • Trying to download mountain lion, but when I try to download it, asks me security questions I dont remember the answers to, so I reset the questions, but old ones still pop up when I try to download mountain lion.  How do I change the questions for good?

    I dont get why it asks me for my password and two security questions when just buying something from the app store, but the questions wont change.

    The Three Best Alternatives for Security Questions and Rescue Mail
        1. Use Apple's Express Lane.
              Go to https://expresslane.apple.com ; click 'See all products and services' at the
              bottom of the page. In the next page click 'More Products and Services, then
              'Apple ID'. In the next page select 'Other Apple ID Topics' then 'Forgotten Apple
              ID security questions' and click 'Continue'. Please be patient waiting for the return
              phone call. It will come in time depending on how heavily the servers are being hit.
         2.  Call Apple Support in your country: Customer Service: Contact Apple support.
         3.  Rescue email address and how to reset Apple ID security questions.
    A substitute for using the security questions is to use 2-step verification:
    Two-step verification FAQ Get answers to frequently asked questions about two-step verification for Apple ID.

Maybe you are looking for