TimeStamp Hour 00 Problem

The hour part of the date is displayed as '00' on our production site when the traffic increases beyond a certain threshold.Some of the App servers show this behaviour ie, hour part set to '00' and then on the future requests behave the same.[Totally there are 18 App Servers split equally across 2 pools served by a load balancer]
The application runs on Websphere AppServer 4.0.2,using JDK version 1.3.0. the platform is Win 2000 SP2
We use the getTimeStamp on the the resultset which is then converted to Java Util Date.
Pls give ur valuable inputs for this critical issue..
-Thanx

Not a solution, but others with the same issue:
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?forum=31&thread=280442

Similar Messages

Sql Timestamp converter problem in Tomcat

Hi all,
I have a table that one of the columns is an Oracle date type. So, I use SQL Timestamp converter in static text that is bound to the column. Here I want to display only the time part of the field, so in the converter properties I changed the pattern to HH:mm (for 24 hours format), and the type property I changed to time only.
Everything is perfect in development using sun app server. Problem is when I deploy that to Tomcat, the column displays 00:00 regardless of the real value. Tried to change the property of the converter, but has no effect.
The differences between sun app and tomcat besides the application server is the jdbc driver. The Tomcat uses Oracle JDBC driver.
Could someone give me some solution about that?
Thanks in advance.

You should try changing java.sql.Timestamp to java.util.Calendar.
java.util.Calendar maps to the dateTime type in XML Schema, and TIMESTAMP as a JDBC type.
Regards,
Mike Wooten

Actual date hours PROBLEM - Displaying or not "Show time" in "User preferences"

Hello,
This is my current issue. I have a 5 days calendar with hours 7AM -> 8PM.
AM ->When I check "show time" in "user preferences", I show the good hours in ES and EF. When I apply AS and AF, AUTOMATICALY the good default hours are applied if i change the date (7AM -> 8PM)...
But, if i check, "do not show time" in "user preferences" and then i apply AS and/or AF changing date, PRIMAVERA apply automaticaly 00:00 in the hour ans "forget" the hours of the calendar...
It represent a big big problem for me, first of all in the gantt representation.
Any idea to fix this issue ?
Thanks

I think you need to do setting in grantt chart view setting..as Day,Week,Month in stead of user preference as " do not show time".

E65 - 2,5 hour problem with time when synchronizin...

Hey everybody
I sincerely hope you guys can answer me on a pretty nasty problem. I have synchronized my E65 with my outlook, but EVERY single entry has moved exactly 2,5 hours forward, so all my meetings now starts 2,5 hours later than usually when i look at my phone.
Vice versa when i make a meeting in my phone an synchronize back to outlook - the meeting starts 2,5 hours EARLIER than i typed it.
At least it is ALL my meetings, but what is wrong and how do i fix it??
I have the latest firmware and i have the latest PC suite and im running GMT+1 on my laptop.
HELP ????
Sincerly Regitze, Copenhagen, Denmark

Were you ever able to figure out this issue? I'm having the same problem except that I'm getting a 5 hour difference. Any ideas?
Thanks

Timestamp conversion problem.

I work in the development of a LabVIEW program that communicates with a
server (written in Java). All acquired data is sent via TCP and the
server can read everything (waveforms and other information). However,
there is a problem in timestamp conversion. We don't know how to
convert the milliseconds correctly. The timestamp is inside a waveform,
so we cannot convert it to formatted string.
Example:
Original timestamp:
13:37:19,639
11/10/2005
String generated with "Flatten to String":
0000 0000 BF71 9ABF A3D7 0800 0000 0000
Converted value (Java server):
13:37:19,000
11/10/2005
Does anyone know the algorithm to obtain the milliseconds from this value: "A3D7 0800"?
Thanks for attention.
My regards,
Vinicius Falseth
Solved!
Go to Solution.

There is a faster way. You can extract the timestamp from the waveform using Get Waveform Components.
At that point, you can convert it to whatever you want. Attached
is a VI which shows a simple conversion to milliseconds, losing a lot
of resolution (128 bit timestamp goes to 52 bit double) and a more
complex conversion showing the internal structure of the timestamp (it
is a 128 bit fixed point number with the decimal in the middle).
You can modify the second conversion to do such things as throw away
the integer portion to get higher resolution on the fraction. Or
you could just save to Java using a four-integer structure.
This account is no longer active. Contact ShadesOfGray for current posts and information.
Attachments:
timestamp.llb ‏48 KB

Daqmx read.vi timestamp incorrect problem (storing the timestamp from start task)

Hello,
I have a state machine with 1st state: configure DAQ where i have [daqmx create channel.vi --> daqmx timing sample clock--> DAQmx start trigger--> daqmx start trigger] connected in order
sample clock in continuous mode, 10000 samples to read and sample rate 1000 Hz ,
start trigger has rising edge selected with a dev1/PFI0 from a daq board.
next state of SM is read channels which has daqmx read.vi set to 1d waveform Nchan Nsamp.
and the program first configures and goes to read channels state and is just waiting for the true value on PFI0,
but the time stamp is not updated to current time/ when daqmx read starts instead it is getting the initial t0 from the time when it was in configure DAQ state of my SM in other words it stores the starting time when strart task.vi was run and then updates from then on.
so in effect i am not getting the exact time stamp values while i am running the vi.
i tried to build waveform by inputting the actual current time but the chart doesnot scroll and shows only few values each reading, when i tried to input the t0 from the waveform given out by read daqmx. vi, it then behaves normally..
option #1 from this link says
http://forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?board.id=250&thread.id=47648&view=by_date_ascending&page=2
Try and do exactly what the driver does. This
will require you to do exactly what you are doing in the posted
example. Call the current system time immediately prior to calling the
DAQmx Read and subtract dt * x where x is the number of samples already
acquired. This will require you to know exactly how many samples have
been acquired. This can be found by calling the Total Samples Per
Channel Acquired property immediately prior to the DAQmx Read. This
introduces some points of innaccuracy. For example, you're system time
is already innaccurate to some amount. In addition, it takes some time
between calling system time, calling the total samples acquired, and
calling the DAQmx read. If 2 samples are acquired between calling the
system time and total samples acquired, you could be off by a few
samples. For slower clock rates, you will have more accuracy.
but there are no samples that are acquired until the rising edge, so the number of samples is always zero before the read operation
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/5D42CCB17A70A06686256DBA007C5EEA
this link says that
and the number of samples in my waveform is constantly changing around 20-40, so i cannot really input the current time to build the waveform, thats what i can figure out for now..
can somebody tell me why this is happening or is there any fix around this, how to get the current time into my daqmx read.viso it displays the currect time on my waveform chart
Thanks,

thanks,
im using LV 8.6, daqmx driver 8.9.5.
yes the program u posted get the currect time. but see attached program thats what i have in my program exactly
if you took out the time to using the get waveform components using the waveform from daqmx read. i still have the timestamp as the application start time. plz see attached code 8.2v and FP
the waveform time x axis is not current, it is starting from the application start time.
PS: samples to read = 10,000 and sample rate = 1000
plz help..
Attachments:
daqmx read problemp.png ‏8 KB
daqmx read problem.vi ‏36 KB

Hour problem

Hello, I just have a problem with hour configuration in OS X; I explain: I've installed Windows Vista with Boot Camp and unfortunately, the hour in Windows is not the same as the hour in OS X. If I correct the hour of the false one, the other one will become false.
Is somebody can tell me how to synchronize those different operating systems?
Thanks
PS: Sorry I'm not a native speaker, so my English is not perfect; I keep it hard to explain myself...

Exactly the same problem here, except that I use Windows XP instead of Vista in the same machine. I have unset all automatically updates and synchronization in both OS (mac and windows) and it continues messing up the hours. I don't know how to enforce a time/hour to this.
This is only one more flaw of this mac book pro, I am regreting a lot of wasting my money in this. I also can't run ANY UPDATE for Boot Camp, because it won't run at all in Windows....

Timestamp rounding problem

In a state machine I'm setting the current time for a process as the start time and adding 6 hours for end time in the initial state. Later in the 7th state, i can change the start time and the second/ms value rounds off (e.g. 12:30:00.000 PM) but the end time when changed rounds off to say 4:20:39.333 PM. But I want it to look like 4:20:00.000 PM. What do I do? [Increment value for both are 60, coerce down]
Solved!
Go to Solution.

PhillipBrooks wrote:
altenbach wrote:
Also note that the subVI code could be simplified dramatically.
You don't need to unbundle-rebundle all elements, just the one that changes (hours, top image)
Even simpler, add the number of seconds to the timestamp (bottom image).
Jim Kring posted a few years ago on his blog a cool feature of timestamps; they support units!
You can set the units for the constant to hours and add that directly to the timestamp; no units scaling required...
(Oops; looks like altenbach commented on that blog, you already know about this)
http://thinkinging.com/2007/06/08/labview-tip-easy-relative-timestamp-calculations/
Doesn't mean that old... umm... hands... don't need reminding every so often.
Bill
(Mid-Level minion.)
My support system ensures that I don't look totally incompetent.
Proud to say that I've progressed beyond knowing just enough to be dangerous. I now know enough to know that I have no clue about anything at all.

Time String to Timestamp Conversion Problem

Hi,
I attempted to convert time string to timestamp but I failed. What is the wrong with it? I need a timestamp to create waveforms.
Egemen
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
Time String to Timestamp.png ‏18 KB

You are right Gogineni, when I got the error, I was using %S in the format string for Format Date/Time String function and %3u in the format string for Scan From String.
I found the solution in this thread - use %S%3u in both places.
Help the forum when you get help. Click the "Solution?" icon on the reply that answers your
question. Give "Kudos" to replies that help.

Strange Timestamp value problem

Hi gurus,
Please help me. And thanks in advance!
I have a stored procedure that creates an xml document, which includes a timestamp value converted from a date type column. When this procedure is run through a job, the converted timestamp value is considered invalid by our partner in that it has a plus (+) sign and some 0's at the end. But when I run the procedure manually from SQL*Plus, the timestamp value comes out valid. Here is what I have for the results.
Result when run from within the server through a job:
<ScheduleFor>
<ScheduledDateTime>2007-10-23T10:15:43+00:00</ScheduledDateTime>
</ScheduleFor>
Result when manually run from SQL*Plus:
<ScheduleFor>
<ScheduledDateTime>2007-10-23T10:16:36-05:00</ScheduledDateTime>
</ScheduleFor>
And here is the SQL for the above:
select xmlelement("ScheduleFor",
     xmlelement("ScheduledDateTime", to_char(to_timestamp_tz(to_char(sysdate,
     'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS'), 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS.FF'),'YYYY-MM-DD"T"HH24:MI:SSTZH:TZM'))
     ) into v_xml
     from dual;
Does anyone have an idea why I get this? We are on Oracle 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0.
Thanks a lot.
Ben

Thanks again! You are right. This does change the time zone to 8:0:
ALTER SESSION SET TIME_ZONE = '-8:0';
select xmlelement("ScheduleFor",
xmlelement("ScheduledDateTime", to_char(to_timestamp_tz(to_char(sysdate,
'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS'), 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS.FF'),'YYYY-MM-DD"T"HH24:MI:SSTZH:TZM'))
from dual;
<ScheduleFor><ScheduledDateTime>2007-10-24T08:37:05-08:00</ScheduledDateTime></ScheduleFor>
I will tell the DBA to fix it.
Thanks again!
Ben

TIMESTAMP import problem

I'm trying to import from a csv file where the date format is 01-sep-05, how can i map this to my table? im getting a ORA-01843: not a valid month. Can someone descriebe the basics?

You can try the "alter session set nls_date format='dd-mm-yy' or whatever your format is.
Otherwise import to a temp table with a date (or even varchar2 field), not a timestamp field, then select into the original from the old (use the to_date() sql statement).
Beware I have not been able to show timestamp fields on HTMLDB forms yet.
HP

Timestamp format problem

SQL> select to_timestamp_tz('09-JUL-09 14.21.14.750794 +01:00', 'dd-MON-RR hh24.mi.ssxff TZR') from dual;
TO_TIMESTAMP_TZ('09-JUL-0914.21.14.750794+01:00','DD-MON-RRHH24.MI.SSXFFTZR
*09-JUL-09 14.21.14.750794000 +01:00*
I need the value to be returned in "timestamp with time zone" format as *09-JUL-09 14.21.14.750794 +01:00*. How do I go about it?

Not sure if this is the right way to do it. Assuming you want the fractional seconds to be rounded off after 6 precisions:
SQL> SELECT TO_TIMESTAMP_TZ ('09-JUL-09 14.21.14.750794 +01:00',
2                          'dd-MON-RR hh24.mi.ssxff6 TZR'
3                         )
4    FROM DUAL
5 /
TO_TIMESTAMP_TZ('09-JUL-0914.21.14.750794+01:00','DD-MON-RRHH24.MI.SSXFF6TZ
09-JUL-09 02.21.14.750794000 PM +01:00
1 row selected.
SQL> SELECT CAST
2            (TO_TIMESTAMP_TZ ('09-JUL-09 14.21.14.750794 +01:00',
3                              'dd-MON-RR hh24.mi.ssxff TZR'
4                             ) AS TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE
5            )
6    FROM DUAL
7 /
CAST(TO_TIMESTAMP_TZ('09-JUL-0914.21.14.750794+01:00','DD-MON-RRHH24.MI.SSX
09-JUL-09 02.21.14.750794 PM +01:00
1 row selected.
SQL> Regards,
Jo
Edited by: Joice John on Jul 9, 2009 7:03 AM
Modified first query to match OP's query

Can anyone help with a timestamp filter problem

Hello
I need to filter all times before 09:30 and all times after 15:30. The filtering that takes place in the attached VI filters the dates properly up to 46 days but then 4:30 becomes 09:30 and 09:30 no longer appears approx element 327 in the right array set.
Any suggestions would be appreciated. I have expirimented with the local vs standard time settings but things never get filtered properly.
Thanks
Tim C.
1:30 Seconds ARRRGHHH!!!! I want my popcorn NOW! Isn't there anything faster than a microwave!
Attachments:
Stock Data File Feed Filter Error.vi ‏204 KB

I used the attached conversion VI (found on NIs website and modified slightly) and replaced all the code in your FOR LOOP. I ran this and the final time stamps look good. Your original VI modified is attached.
By the way, your code is strewn all over the place, I would suggest modularizing with sub-VIs...you could shrink your block diagram WAY down (to something that would fit on my 1680x1050 screen).
The attachments are for LabVIEW 8.5. What version are you using?
Message Edited by Bill@NGC on 09-24-2007 10:34 PM
“A child of five could understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.”
― Groucho Marx
Attachments:
Convert_String_to_TimeStamp.vi ‏16 KB
Stock Data File Feed Filter Error-1.vi ‏193 KB

Conversion from DATE to TIMESTAMP datatype

Hello,
My issue is as follows:
1. I have one variable of type DATE, which I assign the value of SYSDATE
mydatevar DATE:= SYSDATE;2. I want to find *"today"*, truncated to DAY
TRUNC (mydatevar, 'DD')
TRUNC function returns DATE datatype. So I will receive in point 2 for example *'2010-01-13 00:00:00'*.
3. I want to assign the value from point 2 to a variable of type TIMESTAMP
mytimestampvar TIMESTAMP := mydatevar;which implicitly will convert the DATE variable to TIMESTAMP.
Problem: During the conversion (both implicit and explicit conversion with a format mask) I lose the "00" hours and "00" minutes and receive something like this: "10-JAN-13 *12*.00.00.000000000 AM".
Question: How can I convert from DATE to TIMESTAMP keeping hours and minutes zeros?
Why I need this conversion: I have a table with a column "column1" TIMESTAMP(0) and I would like to take only those rows from the table, where "column1" is in range from today 12 o'clock in the morning till now (whatever hour it is).
NLS characteristics of the database:
PARAMETER                           VALUE
NLS_LANGUAGE                           AMERICAN
NLS_TERRITORY                   AMERICA
NLS_CURRENCY     $
NLS_ISO_CURRENCY                    AMERICA
NLS_NUMERIC_CHARACTERS     .,
NLS_CHARACTERSET                    AL32UTF8
NLS_CALENDAR                            GREGORIAN
NLS_DATE_FORMAT                    DD-MON-RR
NLS_DATE_LANGUAGE            AMERICAN
NLS_SORT     BINARY
NLS_TIME_FORMAT                     HH.MI.SSXFF AM
NLS_TIMESTAMP_FORMAT             DD-MON-RR HH.MI.SSXFF AM
NLS_TIME_TZ_FORMAT             HH.MI.SSXFF AM TZR
NLS_TIMESTAMP_TZ_FORMAT     DD-MON-RR HH.MI.SSXFF AM TZR
NLS_DUAL_CURRENCY              $
NLS_COMP                             BINARY
NLS_LENGTH_SEMANTICS              BYTE
NLS_NCHAR_CONV_EXCP             FALSE
NLS_NCHAR_CHARACTERSET     AL16UTF16
NLS_RDBMS_VERSION             10.2.0.4.0Session parameters are the same.
DBTIMEZONE is "+02:00".

Verdi wrote:
Problem: During the conversion (both implicit and explicit conversion with a format mask) I lose the "00" hours and "00" minutes and receive something like this: "10-JAN-13 *12*.00.00.000000000 AM".I don't think you are necessarily losing any information whatsoever. It's probably more of a function of your NLS_TIMESTAMP_FORMAT and NLS_DATE_FORMAT. For example your NLS_DATE_FORMAT could be setup by default for a HH24 (24 hour time) which would report midnight as "00" hours. However, it looks like your NLS_TIMESTAMP_FORMAT is setup with a "HH" format with a meridian indicator which means 12 hours time.
Your comparisons should be using date/timestamp data types anyways so as long as the input value is converted properly into a date type this shouldn't matter anyways.
You can see what is actually stored by using the DUMP function:
SQL> SELECT DUMP(TO_TIMESTAMP(TO_CHAR(TRUNC(SYSDATE,'DD'),'MM/DD/YYYY HH:MI:SS AM'))) AS TSTAMP
2 ,       DUMP(TRUNC(SYSDATE,'DD')) AS DT
3 FROM DUAL
4 /
TSTAMP                                                                      DT
Typ=187 Len=20: 218,7,1,13,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,3,0,0,0,0,0                  Typ=13 Len=8: 218,7,1,13,0,0,0,0As you can see the TSTAMP and DT store nearly the same values (218,7,1,13), but the TSTAMP has more precision because of fractional seconds.
HTH!
Edited by: Centinul on Jan 13, 2010 7:23 AM

Multiple Samsung Stratosphere problems after FF1 update

There have been multiple posts on various issues users have found after the recent Stratopshere FF1 update. Some were replys to older posts and some only touched on a single issue. I wanted to consolodate into one thread, and hopefully get teh attention of Verizon to maybe reply here.
For reference, a lot has been discuss here --> https://community.verizonwireless.com/message/874446
Summary: Verizon and Samsung have finally updated the Stratosphere almost 1 year after release. This updated the phone from Android 2.3.5 to Android 2.3.6. Going by filename, this is known as the FF1 update. This update went live at the end of August 2012, and most users were upgraded before mid September 2012.
There were some noticable changes in this update:
-Lock screen has changed. The puzzle piece and glass lock options have been removed. New options have been added, such as facial recognition unlock.
-Call answering screen has changed, introducing the option to ignore call with a message.
-Camera now has digital zoom ability.
-Ability to uninstall the 2 games the phone comes with (Need for Speed and Lets Golf)
-Phone icon has changed ever so slightly
-Wifi icon now included up and down arrows to indicate data is being sent or recieved
-Wallpaper no longer "stretches" over multiple screens - ie, it no longer scrolls as you move from screen to screen
-The visual voicemail app has been improved (I have personally not used this feature)
-Callback number is now supported in text / picture messages
-Android core OS updated from 2.3.5 to 2.3.6 (both versions are still Gingerbread)
-Update to how the device deals with the end of scrolling. It used to rubber-band bounce back, now it will just give a green bar and expand the bar as you scroll. (I cannot fault Samsung for this change as this was at teh core of an Apple lawsuit and has been changed in newer versions of Android.)
-(I am sure there are more. please list any others you may have noticed)
I have found some problems, and others have confirmed that this is (at least) somewhat widespread:
-The biggest problem is with wifi connectivity. Upon an initial connection to wifi, everything works great. After somewhere between 15minutes and 2 hours, problems start happening. Its as if the wifi keeps hanging or reconnecting. Download speeds (tested with the SpeedTest.com app) slow to about one third of normal. Apps like Facebook that require a constant connection will just time out.
-It appears the signal strength for 3g and 4g connections is lower. There are places where I used to get a 4g connection, and now I only get 3g. Some palces I fall back to just 2g digital.
Another minor issue i found was with text messages. When you reply to a message, it no longer automatically focuses the text in the input box. You have to first click into the box to start typing. Not a huge deal, but one more step to take over and over. Minor annoyence.
At my house, I struggle to get a 3g or 4g signal. I depend on wifi for my data connection. So with the wifi connection problem introduced by teh FF1 update, my phone is somewhat useless to me now while at home. Here are teh troubleshooting steps I have been through so far to attempt to fix the wifi problem:
-Complete factory reset on my phone. (did not help)
-Pull battery and SIM card out of phone for 15 minutes. (did not help)
-Went to a Verizon store. The guy at the store was helpful, and said he also had a Stratosphere and was getting the same wifi problems after the update. He said all he could do was to send me out a replacement phone. I got the replacement phone, and it had the same problems.
-I read in multiple palces that Android 2.3.6 has a bug within wifi and DHCP. Apparently if you have a DHCP lease set to "forever", the phone will keep requesting a new address. Setting the DHCP server on the router to something like 2 weeks, or using a static IP is supposed to solve this. I have a NetGear N900 router, and I can not change teh DHCP lease time. It appears, however, that my router is not sending out "forever" leases. But just to make sure, I gave my phone a static IP. (None of these steps made any difference).
The only thing that temporarily fixes the problem is a reboot of the phone. This will again give you anywhere from 15min to 2 hours of good wifi use before problems start happening.
I have now had this update for over a week, and on 2 phones. I still can't maintain a wifi connection for much longer than 15 minutes without problems starting up.
I am asking Verizon or Samsung to at least confirm this issue if possible. Maybe there are newer revs of the Stratopshere hardware that don't have this problem. Or there is something unique about my (and apparently others) situation. But it seems like Verizon's current stance is to offer a repalcement phone (as currently all Stratospheres are within their 1 year manufacture warranty as the phone has not been ouy for quite 1 year yet).
I am asking for a workaround for this problem, or a true fix adressed by a new software update, or at least allow us to roll back to the original Andorid 2.3.5 software.
I have had my original Stratosphere for almost a year with no wifi problems - then get the FF1 update and have had nothing but problems on 2 different phones.
Thank you for your time.

Thanks for starting a comprehensive thread on problems with this update. I want to add one more.
I have Bluetooth in my car (a 2004 model), and previously the phone has connected to it practically instantly when I start the car. Since the update, I have never been able to connect the phone to the car by Bluetooth. Several times the phone has made a standard notification sound at the moment it should be connecting to Bluetooth, though no notification appears. I have no idea what that could mean.The car's Bluetooth shows up as paired in the list of devices in Settings > Wireless & networks > Bluetooth settings. I haven't seen this widely reported as an update issue, but perhaps some others have experienced it too.
UPDATE: I finally did some testing, and found that the notification was to signal the extremely brief appearance of a dialog indicating that the car's Bluetooth was requesting a connection. Accepting that request let the phone connect with the car, and calls went to the car's sound system as they should. When I turned the car off and back on (just the electrical system; not wasting any gas on this!), the connection was established immediately, so apparently the acceptance only had to be done once. Nevertheless, it did have to be done, and the dialog notification disappears within seconds. I believe it would have been possible to go into Bluetooth settings and accept the connection request there if I missed the notification; but not seeing the notification, I might not know to do this.
One further observation: When I turned the phone's Bluetooth off and back on after a connection had been established, leaving the car on the whole time, the two did not reconnect. I believe that may be different from before the update, but I'm not really sure.
Message was updated by David Rensberger

TimeStamp Hour 00 Problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for