To block the Purchase orders with the help of Quality info record.

Dear All,
I have one requirement and it is as follows.
In Quality Info Record we have a tab called Release in that there are two sections one is Release quantity and the other is Block.
Now my client requirement here is : consider an example suppose he enters 100 in the quantity field,upto 100 the system must allow him to do Purchase Order after the 100 system must show an error that quantity is blocked and Purchase order cannot be created.
The purchase order should only create when he changes the quantity from 100 to the higher quantity.
Is this possible?
if so kindly tell me what are the  normal settings and configuration settings to be done.
as the client doesnot want to change it manually.
Kindly guide me in this regard.
Regards,
santosh.

Dear Santosh,
E.g. lets say Release Qty. = 100.
now, if the material received from vendor is OK, you want to continue with that vendor, and if material is rejected,no further material will be rceived.
as, your client do not wants to do it manually,
in q-info record, above "release qty" there is "Release qty. active"tick. so, create Z function module which will only reset the "QINF FREI_MGKZ" field, and assign it into Follow-up action for Usage decision for acceptance. it will be better to create new UD code.
at the end, if Material is Ok, after UD, it will remove "Release qty. active" tick and you can continue with that vendor.  and if UD is rejected, system is not going to allow for PO, as release qty was 100.
regards,
Amol

Similar Messages

  • How to find out the purchase order# giving the sales orde numer?

    Hi Gurus,
    how to find out the purchase order# giving the sales order# or material
    with regards
    thambe

    hi
    use va02-t.code
    double lick on line item data--> click on order data tab.
    there you can find the po details relavant to that sales oreder & the material.
    Thanks & Regards,
    krishna.

  • Email of the Purchase Order to the User

    Hi,
    Currently, I am able to send the email of the purchase order to the vendor mail address, which is mentioned on general data tab of the vendor master.
    In addition, the requirement is that the purchase order also to be emailed to the User, who has created it.
    I have added the VU in NACE settings for application EF, output type NEU. The payment medium I have used is 5 (external send).
    However, when I try to add the VU and the user name to the vendor master partner details tab, the system is not taking in.
    Please let me know how can I email the purchase order to user.
    Thanks in advance for your time.
    Thanks,
    Ravi

    Hi,
    1) Add the user email address also in the vendor master.
    2) Verify all settings in condition records.
    3) Check tcode sost for any waiting send requests.
    Regards,
    BK

  • Partner details are not getting captured to the purchase order from the ven

    Hi,
    Issue : ( ECC PO)
    Partner details are not getting captured to the purchase order from the vendor master.
    We found that the partners are not getting captured in ECC PO's automatically from the vendor master. We checked for all the config and everything seems to be o.k, but could not figure it out.
    Any suggestions are highly appreciated.
    Regards
    Sudhakar

    Hey Sudhakar,
    I believe what is happening here is that the ECC PO document type has not been assigned to the partner determination procedure.
    If this is working properly for standard POs, then,
    Go to Partner detrmination under Purchasing>  Partner Settings in Purchasing Documents> Assign Partner Schemas to Document Types.
    and enter teh appropriate document type and refer it to the procedure you have for NB Pos

  • How-to extend the Sales Order with the Project ID?

    Hello ByD Community,
    My problem is the following:
    I want to add an extension field to the Sales Order Header, which would be the Project ID assigned to this Sales Order.
    My use case only involve one Project ID per Sales Order, and the task will be the same from a Line Item to another. So I can only use the GetFirst() to retrieve only the first Line Item.
    Past week, I asked a similar question for the Purchase Orders and I succeeded to do it after a hint from Dan!
    As for the Purchase Order, I thought the Project Assignment was built through the SalesOrder.Item.ItemAccountingCodingBlockDistribution.AccountingCodingBlockAssignment.ProjectReference, but it seems that it is different.
    So as soon as I try to check if this Association IsSet() it just returns me that it is not!
    I succeeded to bluntly push the TaskUUID in my Extension field for testing purpose, without any check and verification, but not the Project ID neither with good validations.
    I also tried to see with the SalesItem Association instead of the Item Node, but it is the same. Any time I try a different check it returns me the N/A for my field, which is my last condition if the association is not set! What is driving me crazy is that you have the Project ID is shown on the top of the Sales Order, but I just cannot find how to retrieve it in the Studio!!!
    Here is my sample code in my After-Modify event (I also tried with a On-Save) where the ProjectIDSalesOrder is my extension field in the Cloud Solution:
    import ABSL;
    if (this.Item.GetFirst().ItemAccountingCodingBlockDistribution.IsSet())
      if (this.SalesItem.GetFirst().ItemProduct.ProductCategoryHierarchyProductCategoryIDKey.ProductCategoryInternalID.Matches("130"))
           this.ProjectIDSalesOrder = this.SalesItem.GetFirst().ItemServiceTerms.ProjectTaskUUID.content.ToString();
         /*what I need actually is : this.ProjectIDSalesOrder =      this.Item.ItemAccountingCodingBlockDistribution.AccountingCodingBlockAssignment.GetFirst().ProjectReference.ProjectID.content;*/
      else {this.ProjectIDSalesOrder = "No project assigned";}
    else {this.ProjectIDSalesOrder = "N/A";}
    If anybody could help me on this, it would be greatly appreciated.
    Thank you community!
    Best regards.
    Jacques-Antoine

    Hello all,
    To follow up on this issue, I found that a QueryByElements is available in the SalesOrderOverview node. And we can Query the SalesOrder by ProjectID.
    Fine! However, we cannot retrieve the ProjectID. It is never proposed as a result in the Query. We can query againt a ProjectID but not retrieve it.
    As the ItemAccountingblockDistribution association seems to never be set, we can't retrieve the ProjectID from it neither.
    I will post an incident to see if the ProjectID can be released as an entity in the SalesOrderOverview. QueryByElements results, so as to be able to use it.
    Thanks for your attention.
    Jacques-Antoine

  • Copy the Purchase order # to the Sales order created with reference

    Generally if you create a new sales order with reference to a pre-existing sales-order, then the PO# does not get copied.
    What would you have to do in-order to get the PO# copied into the new sales order ?
    Thanks

    Dear Noel,
    As per the standard it will not get copy if you want you need to take help from the technical people (ABAPers) they may able tohelp you on that.
    I hope it will help you
    Regards,
    Murali.

  • Automatic payment block for purchase orders with no GR

    Hi all, we have this issue. We would have an automatic payment block for all the PO's that have the 2-way match (no GR set)
    All these PO's in our company have an account assignement (that could be a cost center or a WBS element).
    The important is that all these PO's after inserted in the MIRO transaction should have the payment block set automatically Thanks for any precious help

    Hi !
    you can set it in the vendor master record on screen 'Payment transactions Accounting'
    For your information reffering to the IV process, payment block and payment method is derived from
    payment term instead of vendor master. Please check with OBB8, " pmnt
    block/ pmnt method default".
    For more information about this, please refer to the notes 322430
    and 177224.
    If the vendor is blocked, automatic payment program (F110) will not
    pay the vendor during the payment run. You can find more information in
    F1 help of "payment block" field in master data (LFB1-ZAHLS).
    MIRO is strictly PO-bases, the payment terms are copied from the PO
    rather than from the vendor master. The business reason is, that the PO
    represents the contract between vendor and customer including the terms
    of payment.
    Best regards
    Shivendra Tripathi
    INDIA

  • Simultaneous notifications of the same order with the CO11N

    Hello PP Team
    I have a problem
    Notifying with the transaction CO11N, exists the possibility that from several working places is notifying at the same time the same production order.
    What happens with SAP's standard is that it they appears a mistake: " The order the XXXXXXXXX is being treated by the user the XXXXXX "
    There exists some way of being able to use in the CO11N the same production order from different users and different PCs?
    Thanks in advance
    Regards

    Thanks 4 your answer, but it isn't OK for me.
    For example...
    We have a production order n."12345678"
    It is a long chain of production, in which some pieces, for example, finish of a so called work center "X".
    These pieces enter a work center "Y". In this work center, the process is low in time that in the work center X, for what while the operation 10 is confirming, in another working place "Y", the operation 20 is confirming too.
    There are 2 different computers, with tcode CO11N opened, and the problem is what i said before... using the same production order, in work center "Y" appears the error message: "The order 12345678 is being treated by USER123"
    I know that It is SAP's standard rule... but how can i change it?
    Any idea?
    Thanks in advance!
    Regards

  • Deletion of  the Purchase order at the item level and header level

    Hi Gurus,
    We are using SRM 7.0 system.
    In standard SRM 7.0, the PO can be deleted at header level and at line item level. I need to know the differnce between these deletions. I found that if the PO is deleted at the line item level the  deletion indicator (DEL_IND) field in BBP_PDIGP table is 'X'.
    But i could not find any clue to find the PO which is deleted at the header level. I need to code this logic in a report .
    Kindly provide your valuable inputs.
    Thanks,
    RK

    There are two ways:
    1. From the Header by clicking the DELETE button. And this is only possible when the PO is not yet output to Vendor.
    2. The second way is to delete all the items in the PO. This is possible any time irrespective of the output sent to the vendor. But provided if there are no follow-on documents for this.
    Some times we could see the Deletion icon active in Header  , it is because there is change version existing.
    When a PO is created and ordered, this is the first version of the PO. And this PO is sent to the backend and output is sent to
    the vendor.
    Now when you make a change and hold it, SRM creates the 2ndversion of this PO. Then when you delete this PO, SRM marks this 2nd
    version of PO to closed. Also you receive the pop-op confirmation that PO was deleted at this point. However, this PO deletion is never sent to the backend and output is not sent to the vendor since this PO has never been ordered. This version is the Change Version. This is shown after the PO number field if you pay attention on the screen.
    When you search for the PO, it will show you the ordered PO (No change version shown after the PO number). The system does not show you the deleted version which is version 2. That is why you see status is 'ordered'.

  • Purchase Order is not Picking Price from Info Record.

    Dear All,
                                                                             User had created a Shopping cart in and an automatic Purchase Order is created which is picking the material price from Purchase Requisition but not from Created Inforecord. As checked in P.R at item level it is found that in VALUATION tab there is a field named as " P.O PRICE " , here defalt t selected as " 1 A Gross Price "., Can u please help that from where this field is automatically selected as Gross Price in Purchase requisition.
    Thanx n Rgds,
    sap11

    This is the config done in the OMET transaction where you will see the Adopt PO price field is checked and now this funcitonal authorization code e.g. 01 assgined to user profile in SU3 transaction agianst the parameter EFB.
    if this is active than it will not take price from info record but it will copy from PR.
    to avoid this kind of issue -
    Remove the EFB value in SU3 for particular user or if user needs to have the EFB profile for some other requirements than go to OMET and remove Adopt po price indicator from that profile which is assigned to user

  • Why photoshop CS6 doesn't send the print order with the Mitsubishi CK60DW?

    The printer driver works because I am able to print on other applications, but that is not the case for Photoshop. Photoshop is able to print with any other printer but not with Mitsubishi's. There is no error message or anything, when I click the button for printing it works as if it would have already printed but nothing appears on the print queue list and nothing happens at all. Does anybody knows what could be the problem? The OS I'm using is Mac's Mavericks

    About the only thing I can suggest is to click on "Print Settings" and see if anything looks off.
    This is a screenshot taken from CS6 under Mavericks.

  • Is there any function module to get the purchase order conditions from EONP

    Hi,
    I want to get the EONP and EONH table details for the purchase orders with the help of function module. Can anyone tell me any function module name which would give me those details.
    Thanks,
    Atanu

    Hi
    Check with BAPI function module BAPI_PO_GETDETAIL and BAPI_PO_GETDETAIL1.
    Regards
    Srilaxmi

  • HOW TO BLOCK THE PURCHASE ORDER AND MARK FOR DELETION ?

    Hi ,
                        During the Creation of the Purchase order in the SAP System... After creation of the Purchase order should be blocked and a work item is created for the approver. If the Approver approves the Order then the Order is Unblocked and a mail send to the initiators inbox and the Order is Released. Similarly if the Approver Rejects the Purchase Order then its set for Mark for Deletion.
    I did Po creation and release part. But i am facing problem during the Blocking & Unblocking the Purchase order. If he rejects i need to set for "Mark For Deletion". plz help me to solve this...

    Hi,
    You can use bapi 'BAPI_PO_CHANGE' to change the status of PO and for release use bapi BAPI_PO_RELEASE.
    Hope this will help you.
    Smit

  • Invoice not match with the purchase order - Error FRM-40350

    Hola a Todos, tengo un problema en el modulo AP al ejecutar "Lotes de Facturas" (Invoice Batches) cuando se quiere asociar una Orden de compra con la Factura, en las siguientes imagenes se muestra lo que sucedio.-
    Hi Everyone, I have a problem in the AP module to run "Invoice Batches" when you want to associate a purchase order with the invoice is not match, in the following images shown what paso.-
    Version Oracle EBS = 11.5.10.2
    he visto las siguiente tablas y esto me muestra
    Table RCV_TRANSACTIONS, no record found.-
    gracias si alguien sabe cual es el problema.-
    thank..

    Hi,
    Please be informed that for one a GR document wrt PO only one excise invoice can exist.
    Ex PO-4500000010
    GR no 5000000010
    only one excise can exist and if the same excise invoice is reffered to another GR with the same PO system will throw an error message. Please let me know the exact business requirement in detail.
    Naveen

  • Need to find how to relate the purchase order table with account assignment

    i need to reterieve the account assignment from the table bbp_pdacc, what is field or any tables that is between BBP_PDACC and Purchase order number or the purchase order items. I am working on the SRM system

    Jacques-Antoine,
    You can't directly translate a repeating node or element (such as an Item or a Project Task from the Accounting Coding Block of an Item) to a singular node or element.
    The reason is that, though your use case may have the elements assumed to be the same for all items, this isn't necessarily the case, so ByDesign won't assume that you can use that kind of logic.
    The simplest approach would be to do an On-Save at the Root node of the Purchase Order along the following lines:
    this.projecttaskpo = this.Item.GetLast().ItemAccountingCodingBlockDistribution.AccountingCodingBlockAssignment.ProjectTaskKey.TaskID;
    i wouldn't actually recommend this code.
    You'd need validations for IsInitial, IsSet, and those kinds of functions.
    i'd at least use some foreach loop to check that all the accounting coding blocks were for the same task, raise warnings if they weren't, etc.

Maybe you are looking for