To_char in version 10g and 11g

I have a column (my_column) in a table (my_table) which holds the value as 2.8050000000000001598721155460225418210
When i perform the query as:
select REPLACE(TO_CHAR(my_column, '999990.999'),'.',',') column_val from my_table;
i get the result as ###########.
I get this result in the front end application also.
But when i actually provide the value in the select statement i get correct value as:
select REPLACE(TO_CHAR(2.8050000000000001598721155460225418210, '999990.999'),'.',',') column_val from my_table;
I get the result as 2,805.
The workaround for this issue is use trunc as below:
select REPLACE(TO_CHAR(trunc(my_column,4), '999990.999'),'.',',') column_val from my_table;
This happens in Oracle 11g version only.But in 10g version it works fine even without the trunc.
ANY IDEA WHY THIS HAPPENS.
Regards and Thanks

Hi,
792428 wrote:
I have a column (my_column) in a table (my_table) which holds the value as 2.8050000000000001598721155460225418210
When i perform the query as:
select REPLACE(TO_CHAR(my_column, '999990.999'),'.',',') column_val from my_table;
i get the result as ###########.
I get this result in the front end application also.I suspect you only get the error in a front end; the same regardless of whetehr the front end is SQL*Plus or your application.
That's exactly what SQL*Plus does when you give a character format for a NUMBER column:
COLUMN  deptno  FORMAT A10
SELECT  deptno
FROM    scott.dept;
    DEPTNO
##########but I don't know what would cause it when you are displaying a string.
As Brian said above, you can get the results you want directly from TO_CHAR. I think this is how you want to do it:
SELECT  TO_CHAR ( my_column
              , '999990.999'
          , 'NLS_NUMERIC_CHARACTERS='',.'''
               AS column_val
FROM    my_table;

Similar Messages

  • Validate_layer_with_context -- differences between version 10g and 11g

    I have a spatial table that validates without issues under v10.2.0.4.0. This table was replicated to a new database running v11.2.0.2.0. Under this environment, the validation reports an "ORA-13366: invalid combination of interior exterior rings" issue. Has anyone else experienced this situation and does anyone have an explanation?
    Thanks,
    David

    Hi David,
    Not sure if I actually solved your issue. Any incorrect ring rotation has always thrown ORA-13367 as long as I have been around, 10g or 11g. In 10g you should never have seen true if any of your rings were originally backwards. And indeed its a big polygon but for example I have been doing some testing with "uber" polygons and just the other night was running SIMPLIFY on a polygon with 1.2 million vertices and it took a while (I went to bed) but in the morning it was done.
    How are you testing ring rotation? I put a quickie function below. Are you doing things similarly? TO_CURRENT will actually reallocate rings from inner to outer if one is inside the other. But as part of the rearranging will always correct the ring orientation. In your case that seems not to have happened which is very odd. But perhaps this has something to do with the sheer number of polygons in the collection and how they interact (raw speculation). I would first try removing that particular polygon with SDO_UTIL.EXTRACT and see if there is anything squirrelly about it by itself.
    Cheers,
    Paul
    CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION inspect_ordinate_rotation(
       p_input       IN  MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY,
       p_lower_bound IN  NUMBER DEFAULT 1,
       p_upper_bound IN  NUMBER DEFAULT NULL
    ) RETURN VARCHAR2
    AS
       int_dims      PLS_INTEGER := p_input.get_dims();
       int_lb        PLS_INTEGER := p_lower_bound;
       int_ub        PLS_INTEGER := p_upper_bound;
       p_area        NUMBER;
       num_x         NUMBER;
       num_y         NUMBER;
       num_lastx     NUMBER;
       num_lasty     NUMBER;
    BEGIN
       IF int_dims IS NULL
       THEN
         int_dims := 2;
       END IF;
       IF int_ub IS NULL
       THEN
          int_ub  := p_input.SDO_ORDINATES.COUNT;
       END IF;
       IF int_lb IS NULL
       THEN
          int_lb  := 1;
       END IF;
       p_area  := 0;
       num_lastx := 0;
       num_lasty := 0;
       WHILE int_lb <= int_ub
       LOOP
          num_x := p_input.SDO_ORDINATES(int_lb);
          num_y := p_input.SDO_ORDINATES(int_lb + 1);
          p_area := p_area + ( (num_lasty * num_x ) - ( num_lastx * num_y) );
          num_lastx := num_x;
          num_lasty := num_y;
          int_lb := int_lb + int_dims; 
       END LOOP;
       IF p_area > 0
       THEN
          RETURN 'CW';
       ELSE
          RETURN 'CCW';
       END IF;
    END inspect_ordinate_rotation;

  • How to Install oracle 10g and 11g on aix 6.1

    Can we install oracle 10g and 11g Enterprise Editions on IBM aix 6.1 ? If so how
    Chetan
    Edited by: chetan0926 on Jan 11, 2012 2:56 AM

    Hi;
    Can we install oracle 10g and 11g Enterprise Editions on IBM aix 6.1 ? If so how Yes you can,both version is certified
    I agree Sybrand, Please check installation guide. All your questions will be answered in it
    http://www.oracle.com/pls/db102/homepage
    http://www.oracle.com/pls/db112/homepage
    Also see:
    Oracle Database on Unix AIX,HP-UX,Linux,Mac OS X,Solaris,Tru64 Unix Operating Systems Installation and Configuration Requirements Quick Reference (8.0.5 to 11.2) [ID 169706.1]
    Regard
    Helios

  • Differences between Oracle Discoverer  10g and 11g .

    we would like to know if they are any differences between Oracle Discoverer 10g and 11g and any issues with 10g that are overcome in 11g.
    Please make us aware of any merits in going for 11g over 10g.
    apps version 11.5.10.2
    Regards

    Please see these links for the list of new features, bug fixes, certification, and installation of Discoverer 11g on 11i instance.
    Discoverer 11.1.1.4 Certified with E-Business Suite
    http://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/2011/02/discoverer_11114_ebs.html
    EBS Sysadmin Primer: Oracle BI Discoverer 11gR1
    http://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/2010/08/discoverer_11gr1_primer.html
    Oracle Business Intelligence Discoverer 11g
    http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/discoverer/overview/index.html
    Oracle Business Intelligence Discoverer 11g documentation
    http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/discoverer/documentation/index.html
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • Oracle 10g and 11g diff

    Dear Frineds
    previously i am usning 10g rt now i have installed 11g
    can u tell me the exact differance between 10g and 11g
    how can i find this practilcally,
    thanks

    Arbar Mehaboob - user553581 wrote:
    how can i find this practilcally,At http://tahiti.oracle.com are a few manuals.
    At the beginning of (almost) every manual is a "What's New" section that describes the practical differences for specific features from the previous version. There is also one that provides some high level information, called the "New Features Guide" that provides some high level information about newly introduced features, but doesn't dig much into details of changed features.
    So 'practically', you as DBA or Developer need to understand which features you are using and spend some time reading the manuals to understand what has changed.
    Since Oracle has literally thousands of individual features, and since you are responsible for a subset of those in production, it might not be a bad idea to become familiar with them. ;-)

  • Issue with RN messages between 10g and 11g

    Hi All,
    We are facing some issues for RN messages;
    We have configured Rosettanet Actions on both 10G and 11G . In 11G we have the RNTP (remote trading partner) in 10G we have host. The messages posted from host(10g) are not reaching the 11g remote TP, but failing due to the below errors;
    <29-Aug-2012 14:47:07 o'clock IST> <Error> <oracle.soa.b2b.engine> <BEA-000000> <B2B Label:PCBPEL_11.1.1.6.0_GENERIC_111
    214.0600.1553: java.lang.NullPointerException
    at oracle.tip.b2b.exchange.rnif11.RNExchangePlugin.decodeIncomingMessage(RNExchangePlugin.java:212)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.exchange.rnif11.RNExchangePlugin.decodeIncomingMessage(RNExchangePlugin.java:582)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessageImpl(Engine.java:1919)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessage(Engine.java:1650)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.incomingContinueProcess(Engine.java:4042)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:3718)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:3205)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.processEvent(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:677)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.run(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:211)
    at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.executor.WorkManagerExecutor$1.run(WorkManagerExecutor.java:120)
    at weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener.run(J2EEWorkManager.java:184)
    at weblogic.work.DaemonWorkThread.run(DaemonWorkThread.java:30)
    Could anyone help us on this issue?
    Regards,
    Raj

    Hi Dheeraj ,
    1. With Both 10G we are getting the below error with Rosettanent Exchange Protocol Version 01.10 :
    Description: An unexpected error occurred during validation
    StackTrace:
    Error -: AIP-51505: General Validation Error: Error -: AIP-51505: General Validation Error: oracle.xml.parser.schema.XSDException
    at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.rn20.RNDocumentPlugin.processIncomingDocument(RNDocumentPlugin.java:163)
    at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessage(Engine.java:1927)
    at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.incomingContinueProcess(Engine.java:2617)
    at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:2487)
    at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:2442)
    at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.onMessage(MsgListener.java:527)
    at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.run(MsgListener.java:374)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
    However , when we changed the Exchange Protocol Version to V02.00 we got the below error :
    Machine Info: (APT3VW03)
    Description: B2B adapter general error
    StackTrace:
    Error -: AIP-50031: B2B adapter general error: Error -: AIP-50025: Repository error : Error -: AIP-50547: Trading partner agreement not found for the given input values: From party[NAME] "null", To party[NAME] "null", Business action name "RequestPurchaseOrderAction"; also verify agreement effectiveToDate
    at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessage(Engine.java:2006)
    at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.incomingContinueProcess(Engine.java:2617)
    at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:2487)
    at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:2442)
    at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.onMessage(MsgListener.java:527)
    at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.run(MsgListener.java:374)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
    2. With both 11G Environments we are getting the below error (Exchange Protocol Version 01.10):
    <05-Sep-2012 13:49:36 o'clock IST> <Error> <oracle.soa.b2b.engine> <BEA-000000> <B2B Label:PCBPEL_11.1.1.6.0_GENERIC_111
    214.0600.1553: java.lang.NullPointerException
    at oracle.tip.b2b.exchange.rnif11.RNExchangePlugin.decodeIncomingMessage(RNExchangePlugin.java:212)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.exchange.rnif11.RNExchangePlugin.decodeIncomingMessage(RNExchangePlugin.java:582)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessageImpl(Engine.java:1919)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessage(Engine.java:1650)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.incomingContinueProcess(Engine.java:4042)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:3883)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:3205)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.processEvent(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:677)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.run(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:211)
    at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.executor.WorkManagerExecutor$1.run(WorkManagerExecutor.java:120)
    at weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener.run(J2EEWorkManager.java:184)
    at weblogic.work.DaemonWorkThread.run(DaemonWorkThread.java:30)
    >
    <05-Sep-2012 13:49:36 o'clock IST> <Error> <oracle.soa.b2b.engine> <BEA-000000> <java.lang.NullPointerException
    at oracle.tip.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess.insertMsgTblRowImpl(DbAccess.java:621)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess.insertMsgTblRow(DbAccess.java:524)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess.updateWireBusinessToErrorState(DbAccess.java:6241)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.handleInboundException(Engine.java:5130)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.handleExceptionBeforeIncomingTPA(Engine.java:5062)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessageImpl(Engine.java:1983)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessage(Engine.java:1650)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.incomingContinueProcess(Engine.java:4042)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:3883)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:3205)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.processEvent(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:677)
    at oracle.tip.b2b.engine.ThreadWorkExecutor.run(ThreadWorkExecutor.java:211)
    at oracle.integration.platform.blocks.executor.WorkManagerExecutor$1.run(WorkManagerExecutor.java:120)
    at weblogic.work.j2ee.J2EEWorkManager$WorkWithListener.run(J2EEWorkManager.java:184)
    at weblogic.work.DaemonWorkThread.run(DaemonWorkThread.java:30)
    Regards,
    Raj

  • NVL in view: discrepancy between 10G and 11G

    Hi,
    I've discovered some discrepancy between 10G and 11G in a way how view deals with NVL-based column in a where clause.
    Here are two examples:
    *10G:*
    Connected to:
    Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    SQL> create table test_nvl (null_column number);
    Table created.
    SQL> insert into test_nvl values (null);
    1 row created.
    SQL> commit;
    Commit complete.
    SQL> create view view_nvl as select nvl(null_column,0) null_column from test_nvl;
    View created.
    SQL> select * from view_nvl where null_column is not null and null_column = 0;
    NULL_COLUMN
    0
    *11G*
    Connected to:
    Oracle Database 11g Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
    SQL> create table test_nvl (null_column number);
    Table created.
    SQL> insert into test_nvl values (null);
    1 row created.
    SQL> commit;
    Commit complete.
    SQL> create view view_nvl as select nvl(null_column,0) null_column from test_nvl;
    View created.
    SQL> select * from view_nvl where null_column is not null and null_column = 0;
    no rows selected
    Does anyone know why it behaves differently?
    I couldn't find any documentation regarding this.
    Or I'm just missing something here.
    Thanks

    BANNER
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
    PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
    CORE     11.2.0.2.0     Production
    TNS for HPUX: Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
    CREATE TABLE test_nvl (null_column NUMBER);
    INSERT INTO test_nvl
         VALUES (NULL);
    COMMIT;
    CREATE VIEW view_nvl
    AS
       SELECT NVL (null_column, 0) null_column FROM test_nvl;
    SELECT *
      FROM view_nvl
    WHERE null_column IS NOT NULL AND null_column = 0;
    NULL_COLUMN
    0

  • Is there any difference between 10g and 11g M Views?

    Hi,
    I need to give a demo on and working examples of materialized views. The requirement is this: Master tables are in a 10g R2 DB, MV is in a 11g.
    I just create a DB Link in 11g to point to the 10g DB and then create the MV in 11g.
    Will there be any problems creating a 11g MV using 10 Master tables?
    My question is are there any significant differences between 10g and 11g MViews??
    Thanks & Regards,
    Channa.

    You have to be careful about your versions. 10g could be 10.1 or 10.2 11g could be 11.1 or 11.2
    I wouldn't have an 11.2 database with a database link against a 10.1 database.
    In fact, even with 10.2, I would try to ensure that I have a "high patchset" (10.2.0.4 or 10.2.0.5) although, in theory, 10.2.0.1 should also work.
    See Oracle Support article
    Client / Server / Interoperability Support Between Different Oracle Versions [ID 207303.1]
    Hemant K Chitale

  • Resuming the REDO APPLY : 10g and 11g Differences

    Versions > 10.2, 11.2
    OS > Solaris
    I have a question on step4 below.
    Both in 10g and 11g versions, for a Physical Standby DB, you
    Step1.
    Mount the DB using
    startup nomount; 
    alter database mount ;Step2. Start the REDO Apply using
    alter database recover managed standby database disconnect from session;Step3. Open the standby DB using
    recover managed standby database cancel; -- stop the redo apply
    alter database open ;
    Step4. Resuming the REDO APPLY
    alter database recover managed standby database using current logfile disconnect ;At this point (after step4 ), for 10.2 version, the standby DB goes back to mount mode , but the 11.2 DB remains open for READ ONLY queries because of ACTIVE DATAGUARD feature. Am I right ?

    Yes, you are right.
    In 10g, there is no option of active dataguard (redo applying is not possible when the database is opened). Redo applying is possible only when the standby database is in mount stage. When the database is opened in read only mode, the archive applying is not possible. In order to run queries on database tables, in a physical standby database, one had to stop the log apply and open the database in read-only mode. This means that the log files are being queued up during that period and will have to be applied once the database is reverted to the managed recovery mode.
    In 11g, this is not the case. It allows users to have read-only access to the physical standby databases. This option gives customers the flexibility to run queries to the physical standby database, while the log shipping and apply continues its work.The archive applying can be done even when the database is opened in read only mode. This option is known as Active Dataguard (Oracle High Availability). For this, the steps you have mentioned are perfect. This is the advantage in 11g.

  • Having both 10g and 11g database in single xp machine Not working

    Hi everyone ,
    I installed an oracle 10g database and it was working fine and i wanted to have an 11g database installed and so i did in a separate folder and it got installed successfully but all the net service of my 10g is not getting recognized and so i uninstall 11g and it worked fine and back to normal.
    1. Can't i install both 10g and 11g in a database.
    2. How can i have both them installed without issues in Windows XP SP3 32 bit.

    Mo2 wrote:
    I have 10G express installed on XP and I was planning to install 11G.
    So what I learned from this thread:
    -Yes it is possible to install 11g and 10G on the same xp machine.
    -To use both version you must change few parameters every time.
    so basically it is possible but not recommended. is that a fair description?
    No that is not a fair description. It is possible and quite easily managed. But you do have to be aware of where you are. If you want to just pop in a CD, click 'install.exe', then click an icon to magicly connect to the correct database, then yeah, I'd say it's not recommended, but that says more about the user than the product ...
    Of course, could go even further and say I don't think Windows should be recommended, period. I've worked with IBM mainframes (s-370, OS-VS, OS-MVS, VM, OS/x, etc.), DEC's vms, IBM OS/2, every version of Windows since it's birth, Solaris, AIX, HP-UX, and Red Hat Linux. Windows is the worst excuse for an OS of any of them.
    If you are doing this on your on PC as a learning tool, I'd strongly suggest you
    1) go to vmware.com and get a free copy of vmware player and install it on your pc
    2) go to oracle.com and get free copy of Oracle Enterprise Linux and install that into a virtual machine under vmware player
    3) go to oracle.com and get free copies of whatever oracle products you want and install them on that virtual linux machine.
    By the way, I installed 11g on Vista machine and it is working fine but I uninstall 10G first on that machine.

  • Difference in select for update of - in Oracle Database 10g and 11g

    Hi, I found out that Oracle Database 10g and 11g treat the following PL/SQL block differently (I am using scott schema for convenience):
    DECLARE
      v_ename bonus.ename%TYPE;
    BEGIN
      SELECT b.ename
        INTO v_ename
        FROM bonus b
        JOIN emp e ON b.ename = e.ename
        JOIN dept d ON d.deptno = e.deptno
       WHERE b.ename = 'Scott'
         FOR UPDATE OF b.ename;
    END;
    /While in 10g (10.2) this code ends successfully (well NO_DATA_FOUND exception is raised but that is expected), in 11g (11.2) it raises exception "column ambiguously defined". And that is definitely not expected. It seems like it does not take into account table alias because I found out that when I change the column in FOR UPDATE OF e.empno (also does not work) to e.mgr (which is unique) it starts working. So is this some error in 11g? Any thoughts?
    Edited by: Libor Nenadál on 29.4.2010 21:46
    It seems that my question was answered here - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2736426/difference-in-select-for-update-of-in-oracle-database-10g-and-11g

    The behaviour seems like it really is a bug and can be avoided using non-ANSI syntax. (It makes me wonder why Oracle maintains two query languages while dumb me thinks that this is just a preprocessor matter and query engine could be the same).

  • Important differences between oracle 10g and 11g

    Hi friends, can anyone tell me (pointwise) what are the major (and minor) differences between Oracle 10g and 11g.
    Please point me to some documents if possible.
    Thanks in advance

    The name of the link says it all: "top_features."
    In short it is Oracle's list of what they have for marketing and sales reasons designated "top features."
    It is not intended to be, and is not, a complete list of features. Often the features Oracle does not
    talk about are the most important.
    Let me give you some examples. I have never seen Oracle announce DBMS_XPLAN as a new feature
    yet you should not run an explain plan without it. Neither have I ever seen Oracle announce the new
    NO_DATA_NEEDED predefined exception. I have listed literally hundreds of new features you will not
    find in Oracle's new features docs.
    I did a presentation at OpenWorld this year as part of the unconference titled "New Features in
    Database 11gR2 that Oracle will not announce." It was easy to prepare a one hour presentation with
    little fear of being proved incorrect. As I turned out only one of the features I presented was mentioned
    by Oracle.
    You can find the presentation slides here:
    http://www.morganslibrary.org/pres/oow09_ucnf.pdf

  • Running Oracle database 10g and 11g on same 5 RAC nodes

    Hello Gurus,
    Could any body throw light if I can install and sucessfully run Oracle database 10g and 11g on the same Oracle RAC installation setup.My setup is below
    Number of nodes-5
    OS- windows 2003 or RHEL5
    storage- DELL EMC SAN
    Clusterware- oracle version11g
    File system-Automatic storage management(ASM)
    After I successfully setup clusterware,ASM on the nodes,I would want to install 11g database on all 5 nodes .
    Then Install 10g database on only 3 of the nodes using the same clusterware.
    What are your views on the same.
    Also FYI... as per metalink node 220970.1(RAC: Frequently Asked Questions) one can do such a setup.
    what iam looking for is practical experience if anyone has implemented this in production system,if yes any issues faced and how tough it is to support.
    Thanks,
    Imtiyaz

    You could run an 11g database and 10g database on the same cluster as long as you use Clusterware 11g.
    The administration aspect will drastically change according to the platform you run on. As of now, it appears you don't know whether it will be Linux or Windows.
    It would be practical to support the same database release.

  • Difference between Materialised view in 10g and 11g

    Hi,
    I am beginner . I want to know the difference between Materialized view between 10g and 11g. Is there any impact if the materialized view used in 10g gets upgraded to 11g ?
    awaiting ur response.Please and Thanks

    In addition to the documentation, you might want to look at the blog of Alberto Dell'Era:
    http://www.adellera.it/blog/
    Alberto writes quite a bit about materialized views, including this important change in 11GR2:
    http://www.adellera.it/blog/2009/11/03/11gr2-materialized-view-logs-changes/

  • Difference between oracle bpm 10g and 11g

    Newbie: I am trying to understand 10g. The basic questions I have is
    1)What is the difference between 10g and 11g?
    2)What is the infrastructure & skillset needed for me to do implementation in 10g?
    3)How is migration from 10g to 11g is accomplished?
    Any resource links that would help me to get started with 10g would be appreciated.
    Chaitanya

    Hi,
    Please follow the below mentioned link to find your answer.
    Re: Main differences between oracle bpm 10.3 vs 11g
    Migration from ALBPM 5.7 to BPM 11g
    Bibhu

Maybe you are looking for