TO Confirmation in background

Hi,
One of our plants is using LT12 to confirm TOs. The default for TO confirmation has been set as "H Foreground" in transaction screen.  This particular plant wants that default to be set as "D Background".
The issue is if we change the transaction parameters it gets changed for all plants which is not acceptable to other plants.
We tried to check if there is any parameters ID available for this control. However, there is none.
Can anyone suggest how to make this "Foreground/Background" as "D Background" without affecting other plants?
Thanks,
-Shekhar
Edited by: Shashishekhar Waychal on Aug 30, 2010 5:38 PM

One possible soltion is to create transaction variants, create variant groups and assign useres to the suitable variant groups - this way you can control the default value in screen field "RL03T-DUNKL". You can carry out the settings in transaction SHD0.
Please read SAP online help:
"Transaction Variants and Screen Variants"
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/67/232037ebf1cc09e10000009b38f889/frameset.htm
"Creating and Maintaining Variant Groups "
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/46/8ad19434a801dce10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm

Similar Messages

  • CORUPROC (Process chain for confirmation, collective background processing)

    Hello Guru,
    Can you please explain me the program CORUPROC (Process chain for confirmation, collective background processing) that can be use in SE38. and how it its important for CO16N (Reprocessing Incorrect Production Order)?
    CORUPROC is also the same as CO1P transaction code.
    Please explain the use of this program.
    Thanks
    Edited by: Ryan on Feb 3, 2009 7:55 AM

    Hi Carina,
    It might take some time for the attribute change run.
    what you can do is right click on th running process , go to display messages and check if every thing is fine.
    also goto batch monitor from there and see if the job is still running.
    alternatively, if you are not sure if the job got strucked up, kill the job from batch monitor and run the attribute change run manually.
    you got two options two do now.
    1)Wait for some time for the process to complete and check the messages.
    2)kill the job and run att change run manually.
    i suggest you to go for option 1 and if it is taking too long ar there is any error message, analyze and then go for option 2
    hope this helps.
    cheers,
    Srinath.
    Edited by: Srinath Singamsetti on Aug 4, 2009 5:44 AM

  • LU04 qty should be confirmed in background..

    Dear Experts,
    While doing GRN wrt PO and receiving in Quality stock. TO confirmed in Interim bin and stock updated in Interim only.
    After that, Through LT01, partial stock moved to Bin. Now in QA32, batch released and stock posted to both Unrestricted & Blocked stock.
    In LU04, Open quantity appearing for both stock types (Blocked & Unrestricted). Manual TO confirmation done from existing bins.
    If stock type is only one for the batch, Auto TO confirmation happening and no open qty in LU04.
    But,
    Is there any possibility of doing Auto TO confirmation for LU04 in background if single batch existing in multiple bins..??

    Hello Govind,
    For Non-Quality Parts, Configuring direct to 001 is fine.
    For Quality Parts, The Transfer Orders will be created twice. i.e.,
    1st,      PO-GR-TR-TO(TO should be going to Quality Area which is like 921 or you can define new storage type like QCA)
    During this first TO creation, your Search Strategy should influence with Stock Category 'Q'  and divert to 921 or QCA Location ( for these storage Types, Maintain Stock Placement Strategy as 'L' OR 'Q' ).
    After placing the stock here, Quality should take usage Decision using QA32. then against the posting change 2nd TO will be created to move the stock to actual destination. Here, your pick should again incfluence with Stock Category 'Q' to pick from 921 or QCA Location.
    Then, your exepcted scenario automatically works even you have the stock in multiple bins.
    Regards,
    Sathish

  • Automatic TO creation and confirmation for a Material document

    Hi Dear All,
    i am new to MM andWM.
    I have to customization for auto transfer orders and confirmations for material documents what ever created with 101 movement type in Inventory Management. I have down configuration like below.
    SPRO->Logistics Execution->Warehouse Management->Activities->Transfers-> Set Up Autom. TO Creation for TRs / Posting Change Notices
    Double click on ‘control data ‘tab
    Hear for my warehouse I given input like   Auto TO = ‘1’,
                                                                             AddId = ‘select check box’.
    And in ‘Assign control’ tab for 101 movement type I have given input like below.
    Automatic TO = ‘1’.
    TO item can be confirmed immed. = ‘tick checkbox’
    Propose Confirmation = ‘tick checkbox’.
    Foreground/Backgrnd = ‘D’.
    After creating of Material document I am executing report RLAUTA10 in SE38.When I execute this report system showing message like ‘TO processing finished: TR total:   17, TO created:    0, Errors:   17’.
    If I check header details of transfer requirements in LB03, i am not seeing ‘Tick Mark’ in Auto TO Creation field.
    Can any one tell me what the mistake i have down or if i need to do any further configuration. Please help me regarding this concern?
    Thanks in Advance..

    Dear Steve,
    Thanks a lot for giving reply with what I need to do, but I am unable to see result.
    I have down configuration like below even though system not processing Auto TO creation. Can you explain me if I have down any mistake below.
    Click on ‘Assign’ button,
    Press on ‘New entries’
    WhN = ‘900’
    Reference Movement Type = ‘101’
    Movement indicator = ‘B’
    Movement type for Whse Mgmt = ‘101’
    TR create Transfer Requirement = ‘X’
    Immed.TO Creation
    Mail confirmation for background processing = ‘01’.
    GR date = ‘2’

  • Stop Automatic creation and confirmation of Transafer Order for a doc type

    Hello All,
    There is a requirement that I need to stop Automatic creation and confirmation of Transafer Order for a particular document type.
    The issue is that sometimes the cycle goes upto creation of Invoice automatically but sometimes this does not happen. More over the user wants that the transafer order needs to be confirmed manually.
    Can u please provide the .steps involved for thie case.
    Thanks
    Chandrashekhar

    Dear Steve,
    Thanks a lot for giving reply with what I need to do, but I am unable to see result.
    I have down configuration like below even though system not processing Auto TO creation. Can you explain me if I have down any mistake below.
    Click on ‘Assign’ button,
    Press on ‘New entries’
    WhN = ‘900’
    Reference Movement Type = ‘101’
    Movement indicator = ‘B’
    Movement type for Whse Mgmt = ‘101’
    TR create Transfer Requirement = ‘X’
    Immed.TO Creation
    Mail confirmation for background processing = ‘01’.
    GR date = ‘2’

  • Run time error while running BDC for production order creation and confirmation:

    Dear Gurus,
    We have a situation, where the users are trying to do the entries creation of order or confirmation (through manual and BDC). But, if there is any kind of a deficit quantities in consumption or GR quantity, then it is going to run time error and Dumps are coming in program SAPLCORB
    and the transaction code is coming for CO11N.
    How to avoid this error to run the production system in smoothing way...Any flash lights on this will be great full
    Regards,
    Madhu.G

    Hi Madhu,
    Expert Caetano has rightly point out. Refer Note 1840705 - RAISE_EXCEPTION short dump if running CO11N in background
    Cause
    The short dump is triggered because SAP transaction CO11N contains new GUI elements that cannot always be dealt with in a background process,
    such as the confirmation texts.
    Resolution
    SAP recommends that the standard production order BAPIs, such as BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_TT, should be used to post a confirmation in background.
    If this is not feasible, the following workaround may be uses:
    Define a confirmation profile in transaction OPK0; 
    In the detail areas, remove the area "Confirmation text"; 
    Set this profile as standard, so that it is chosen automatically by the system when a batch-job
    is started; 
    Assign this confirmation profile to the batch user with transaction SU3 using parameter CORUPROF.
    Also see Note 429432 - CO11N: Batch input in background dumps if long text is maintained
    Refer to note 1154692 - Endless loop during confirmation in background if you doing Auto GR during confirmations
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ramagiri

  • Execute program in background - Start Condition Pop up

    Hey there,
    When navigating the menu from the initial screen of any report, Program --> Execute in Background, im getting a start condition popup similar to the one when changing the start condition of a job in transaction sm37.
    Once I confirm the Background Print Parameters when navigating the menu to execute the report in background, im getting the following popup - Screenshot of pop - http://imgur.com/O9X0q.jpg
    This has arisen since the latest implementation of the latest SPIs.
    There is a requirement now to suppress this pop-up. How can one achieve this?
    Thanks!

    Hey,
    Before it just got released and sat there and would execute at 11pm the evening or something like that Or until the user manually changed it thru sm37 and executed it.
    Had a look at the SAP Portal already no luck yet. But I'll have to keep looking.
    Cheers

  • ATP Re-Run in background processing for sales order

    Hello All,
    In sales order i need to re run the ATP check for the quantity confirmation in background processing.
    Scenario is :
    I have created orders with order quantity 100.
    while creating the order stock for the same material was only 20 so ultimately it will not confirmed the quantity.
    After the some period i m increasing stock of same material by 120. Now, same order which i created before can be confirmed as i need only 100 quantity in that. but for the same I need to manually run the ATP again and then it will confirm the quantity.
    instead of manually re run the ATP again i want to do this activity in background processing so that it will automatically confirmed the stock once inventory increased.
    Is there any provision in sap to avoid this manual task with the help of background processing or any program?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Rasik

    Hi,
    This can be achieved by rescheduling the orders .
    << Moderator message - Cut and paste response from http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/93/744c0c546011d1a7020000e829fd11/content.htm removed and points unassigned. Plagiarism is not allowed in SCN >>
    You reach the Sales screen.
    Select Environment ® Backorders ® Rescheduling ® Execute.
    You can  also simulate the backorders for rescheduling before confirming by selecting the simulateevaluate option.
    Prerequisite for rescheduling the line items of the order is that at schedule line you should not flag the  field fixed date and quantity field. Also for ATP you must have defined the scope of check with checking rule BO(i guess) for that particular plant in combination of checking group .
    Hope this will help you.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Atulkumar Dagade
    Edited by: Rob Burbank on Jan 24, 2012 10:16 AM

  • IOS 6.1 background audio?

    Did Apple disable background audio in 6.1? I can't get it working on anything except for Music...

    I can confirm that background audio playback is no longer functioning, I use that feature ALOT so this is a big problem for me.
    iPhone 5 iOS 6.1

  • Inbound delivery goods receipt

    G'day All,
    We have just implemented WMS and use both EDI and manual ASN's for Purchase Orders.
    Pre WMS we would receipt the Inbound Delivery via MIGO and if the receipt amount is outside the Confirmation Control Key tolerance for KG's we would receive a message. ie "PU Ordered quantity exceeded by xxx KG".
    Now we are using WMS and before we Goods Receipt, for each Inbound Delivery we also create an Inbound Transfer Order using VL06I “For Putaway”.
    BUT now when we use VL06I (instead of MIGO) to confirm and Goods Receipt in ONE step by using “For confirmatn”.
    For each inbound delivery we choose confirm in background and use option 2 in Adopt Putaway qty (Copy stock plcmt qty as deliv.qty into delivery and post GI).
    The problem is we do NOT receive the error message we did in MIGO. The Inbound TO is confirmed but the GR fails but we don’t know anything about it until we discover a negative amount in our interim GR Storage Type.
    If we do it in two steps and use option 1 (Stock placement qty adopted into delivery as delivery qty) which confirms the TO first, then use “For gds receipt” we get the error message.
    Can anyone help me with ideas on getting the message to display in VL06IC “For confirmatn” When we confirm the TO and GR in one step? We do not want to use the 2 step method as our Despatch department is already overworked and they will rebel and take the easy way out, leaving our inventory controllers with large headaches!
    Thankyou
    Luke
    null

    Hi
    If you are carrying out a Put away against the inbound delivery first and confirming the TO the negative balance is normal as IM Does not know it has arrived yet.
    Once the Put away is completed you need to go back to the inbound delivery and Post Goods receipt. This will show the stock in IM and remove the negative.
    Reason
    Because you are putting the stock away before you inform IM then the stock has to come from somewhere and as the movement type is 101 it creates a negative qty in 902. The post goods issue will post corresponding qty in 902 and cancel out the negative.
    I hope that this helps

  • Goods receipt with WM

    Dear Experts,
    Here , when the goods receipt gets posted, Transfer Order gets generated and confirmed in background,But i want confirmation of TO seperately not while creation.
    Also, I want while confirmtaion,
    1. Can storage bin get changed?
    2.Can putaway strategy considers all previous TO for perticular Bin?

    To deactivate Auto TO confirmation & Auto TO creation go to OMLJ and remove Automatic TO Indicator, and Remove check Boxes under Confiramtion field grp for movement type 101
    To deactivate Immedate TO creation go to OMLR Remove Immediate TO Creation A for the movement type 101
    You can not change the bin at the time of TO confirmation. If you want to consider the same bin for putaway then consider using fixed bin strategy.

  • Delivery Stock in VL06C

    Hello All
    I have  a delivery stuck in the Outbound Delivery for Confirmation Screen. The delivery has already been confirmed in background, when you try again it advises the TO is already confirmed/cancelled.
    The delivery will not however move from the VL06C confirmation screen. when checking the document flow, the delivery is still being processed (TO is completed).
    The outgoing materials are still allocated to the delivery (and even if they weren't we would expect the delivery to require PGI manaully and therefore have moved to VL06G).
    We cannot delete the TO as its confirmed.
    We cannot delete the delivery and start again due to the confirmed line (nomally we would be able to do this).
    Any idea how to remove this?
    Thanks
    Dan

    Hi Both
    Shiva,
    I have never tried RLE_SHP_IDX_TABLE_MAINTAIN. What does this do and is it ok to activate whilst the system is in use?
    Shridhar
    The system is not even attempting the PGI currently (we have a background job) and as the delivery is not yet arrived in VL06G, I cannot do this manually either.
    The parts is not available to create a second TO. the part is held in 916 location. I could probably use LT01 to move the part back to normal stock, try to allocate to a new delivery. I will still have a blocked old delivery left though.
    I cannot use LT0G as the part is locked.
    Regards
    Dan

  • SB 1024 on XP / 2000 probl

    Hello,
    XP / 2000
    The probleme is that my SB li've 024 gives absolutely no sound from the speakers though it works perfectly under win98. All system settings indicate Ok status.
    sb software on the cd cannot be installed either on 2000 / xp .
    Latest unidrv from the creative site cannot be installed it says no sb device is found.
    The piece of advice here below does not work.
    What can be done about the situation? And how it can be that this card works on some systems, as it seems, and does not on the other?
    Thank you
    =All,
    Here is a suggestion from a previous thread that I posted that seems to work a lot on this:
    ) Download an evaluation version of Winzip if you do not already have this program and install it.
    2) Find the Li'veDrvUniPack file and right click on it, go to the Winzip option and choose "extract to..."
    3) Extract it to a directory you know you can find, I usually suggest c:\SBLi've.
    4) Explore to that directory and go into the /audio/drivers/ folders.
    5) Inside this folder should be a program called CTZapXX.exe, shut down all background programs including AntiVirus and run this program.
    6) Choose driver installation and WDM on the window that pops up and hit the ok button.
    7) This will install just the base driver and then ask you to reset. Reset the computer.
    8) When the system comes back up and all startup activity ends then confirm all Background programs are disabled and try running the Li'veDrvUniPack install.
    9) Let it install the software and drivers and then you should have SPDIF out at that point.

    Unfortunately if you read the release notes for the Vista compatible driver it tells you not to use it on your particular sound card ;(?http://us.creative.com/support/downl...rtype=&x=2&y=7?Notes:
    DO NOT?install this driver for Sound Blaster Li've! 24-bit, Sound Blaster Audigy LS, Sound Blaster Audigy SE, or Sound Blaster Audigy Value.<However when you tell the site you have an Audigy Value card it directs you to these incompatible drivers
    go go Creative

  • Background process zffd terminated due to missing confirmation

    Hi all,
            In production system loading 2500000 lak data load to DSO when try to activate the DSO throwing below error. Kindly guide me on this.
    Error:
    Background process <ZASDFFF> terminated due to missing confirmation
    Thanks

    Hello,
    To resolve this issue, you should make some adjustments to the DataStore
    object parameters, then you should be able to activate the request.
    Please make the following adjustments in transaction RSODSO_SETTINGS
    (you can adjust this for each DataStore object):
    1) Maximum package size (for activation).
        This you should reduce to 10000 (if the value is higher than that)
        Then the package processing will be less time consuming.
    2) Maximum wait time for process (for activation)
        This could be increased to e.g. 600 (if the value is lower than this)
    See SAP note 1118205 for further information.
    Best Regards
    Barry

  • Background process BCTL_** terminated due to missing confirmation

    Hi Experts,
    I have a step in Process chain for activation of a request in DSO. But its failing frequently with error message "Background process BCTL_* terminated due to missing confirmation*". I tried to remove the step from process chain and rebuild it, this avoided the failure for a day. But its failing again at same place.
    Can you please guide if anything can be done to stop this failure in future?
    Regards,
    Nirmal

    Hi,
    I also faced the same issue.
    Error when activate DSO in SAP BI :          "Background process BCTL_*   terminated due to missing confirmation"
    I Resolved  by the following way:
    Steps :
    1.ODS Activation window > Click the button u201CActivate in parallelu201D> Changed    the Number of process  3  to 1-->Save
    2.ODS Activation window >Click the button u201CGet SIDs in parallelu201D> Changed    the Number of process  3  to  1--> Save
    Then start the activation
    Successfully completed.
    Hope it will help.
    Thanks &  Best Regards,
    Hema

Maybe you are looking for

  • "There was not enough memory" error message when saving DNG and Jpeg

    PC/Windows XP Pro. Pentium 4/2Gb RAM. I am constantly getting memory errors when trying to save batches of images from ACR4 either as Jpegs or DNGs. A couple of images in to the batch a small window appears with a list of the files and next to each o

  • "Time Machine alert" in the middle of Keynote presentation.

    I was in the middle of a lecture with Keynote when a warning window popped up to inform me that the time machine backup software hadn't had a chat with my external hard disk for a while (was it 2 weeks?) and it needed to reconnect. This was embarassi

  • Help needed with creating a new site- having Spry folder issue

    I can not create a new DreamWeaver CS5 site - I get a warning message that the Spry assets folder is not inside the site & to select a valid folder in the local root directory. I've tried creating a folder to no avail, thus can not create the site. H

  • EJB Store called in a loop

    I am having a problem porting our application from weblogic5.1 (EJB1.1) to weblogic8.1 (EJB2.0) My current problem is an ejbStore called in a loop during a finder method call of a BMP entity bean. The outer session bean calls entity beans in a transa

  • I have more than one ipod need help???????

    I just bought shuffle and i already have ipod(20gb) and itunes library? How do i organize this stuff and do i need to install itunes again from this installation cd?