To which application does business area belong?

Hi,
Report owners are defined by category (right now I am not taking into account users) . We can have an owner GL or AP etc. In other words, if the owner of a report is GL it would then make it obvious that the report belongs to the General Ledger group.
However, the GL owner is defined in the same table as all other users. We would like a LOV of just the general categories and I can't think of a way to separate them from the rest of the users. For now, I defined the LOV using an sql select with " Select ...from dual...UNION .... ". Of course that means that if we should add a new owner then the owner must also be added to the LOV select.
In the Oracle application, when defining a responsibility, there is an application to which the responsibility belongs, e.g. General Ledger. We are trying to find a similiar definition for the Business Areas.
In our company there is more than one Business Area for General Ledger. Is there anything that links those BAs to GL? I don't see it in the eul5_bas table.
The purpose of all this is so that we can have a report which can extract information from all reports of a specific area, for instance all GL reports.
I would like to know if this is even possible.
Thank you.
Leah

I am able to get the all the owners. It is an issue of weeding out only around 10 specific owners. I did that manually by selecting in the sql the owners that were " in (GL,AP....)". It all works fine. However, it was an issue of what if in the future another owner is added (we just recently added PN), and then having to remember that we have to manually go into the script to add PN.
My boss brought up the issue that in the Oracle application all responsibilities belong to a group, isn't there something like that with the business areas. I just wanted to confirm that that is not the case with discoverer, and that is really what you confirmed. Furthermore, I felt that even if those specific owners or business areas were attached to an appication GL,AP etc., it would still be a problem because we would then have to limit the applications to those that we are interested in. We then return to manually limiting the select.
In summary, you confirmed what I thought was the case, and I very much appreciate your responses.
Tamir, thanks very much once again for your help.
Leah

Similar Messages

  • Which application does one use to down load Facetime ?

    Which application does one use to download Facetime?

    Hi ,
    The Mac App Sore one. 
    9:37 PM      Sunday; July 31, 2011
    Please, if posting Logs, do not post any Log info after the line "Binary Images for iChat"
     G4/1GhzDual MDD (Leopard 10.5.8)
     MacBookPro 2Gb( 10.6.8)
     Mac OS X (10.6.8),
    "Limit the Logs to the Bits above Binary Images."  No, Seriously

  • Query to identify to which resposibilities the business areas asre shared

    Hey,
    I have a requiremnt to identify to which responsibilities the Business Area's in the EUL are shared with.
    Can anyone help me if with query to get this info?
    Thanks,
    SK

    SK,
    This is the query I have been using. As you can see, my eul schema owner is eul_us:
    select upper(ba.ba_name) business_area ,
    resp.responsibility_name ,
    resp.responsibility_id ,
    nvl(crtd_by.user_name,'Seeded Business Area') created_by,
    --usrs.eu_username                                   ,
    regexp_substr(usrs.eu_username,'[[:digit:]]+',1,1) user_id1,
    regexp_substr(usrs.eu_username,'[[:digit:]]+',1,2) user_id2,
    crtd_by.user_name
    from eul_us.eul5_eul_users usrs ,
    eul_us.eul5_access_privs privs ,
    eul_us.eul5_bas ba ,
    applsys.fnd_responsibility_tl resp,
    applsys.fnd_user crtd_by
    where privs.ap_type ='GBA'
    and privs.ap_eu_id =usrs.eu_id
    and privs.gba_ba_id =ba.ba_id
    and resp.responsibility_id (+)=regexp_substr(usrs.eu_username,'[[:digit:]]+',1,1)
    and crtd_by.user_id(+) =regexp_substr(ba.ba_created_by,'[[:digit:]]+',1,1)
    and resp.language= 'US'
    order by 1;
    I hope this helps.
    Patrick

  • Which project does my CR belong to?

    Hi
    Apologies is this seems like a really stupid question however ....
    Where can I see which project a Change Request belongs to?  In the work centre for "project" I can see a list of changes however I have a CR that I raised that is not listed - where can I find which project it has become assigned to?
    Also this list in the work center is not very convinient to use - is there a report/other screen where I can see the project that a CR is assigned to?
    Thanks in advance
    Marina

    Hi Marina,
    your second post is correct. There is no link between a Change Request and a Solman Project.
    This means that for example you could possibly have for one Change Request (SDCR) more than one Change Documents (SDMJ) that would be linked to 2 different Solman Projects or at least 2 different maintenance cycles (M...) with 2 different go live date.
    If I remember well standard customizing allows only one change document per change request but with easy specific custo you can change that !
    Another way of doing reporting on those links is directly using Solman transaction (no workcenter) like /n/tmwflow/trmo or /n/tmwflow/proj or /n/tmwflow/reporting (If I remember well)
    Hope this helps !
    Regards
    Khalil

  • To which module does sap biw belong?

    i want to know to which module does sap biw belog. and also i want to know the list of all modules and details of all of them. please give me an information.

    Hi,
    Please check this for SAP modules overview.
    http://www.thespot4sap.com/Articles/SAP_Modules.asp
    Regards.

  • Which Application Firewall ports are open?

    I understand the Application Firewall in OS X (10.5.5) is no longer based on ipfw. Is there a firewall rules list somewhere in the system (similar to the old ipfw list) that reflects the Sharing and Application Firewall options selected, but which shows exactly which ports are open or closed? Is it accessible through Terminal or some other means?

    The ipfw firewall is still there, but Leopard's application firewall isn't a port firewall.

  • How to find "To which role does a user belong"?

    Hi experts,
    I am very new to portal.
    In the starting phase only, i got stuck at one issue.
    I am developing a custom java application for finding user details.
    Here we want to display user role in a iview but not other information, i tried to assign user admin role for finding the role but, client says its not the way, we cant assign full permission to end user.
    Please suggest me the best way earliest.
    Thanks in advance
    <Kamlesh>

    Dear Kamlesh,
    Always Please try it on yourself first, then ask for code.
    I dont have a handy code, but check if this helps you:
        IRole myRole= null;
        try {
            myRole= getSingleRole("<ROLE_ID>", false);
        } catch (UMException e) {
            response.write(
                "Error getting role: " + e.getLocalizedMessage());
        if (user.isMemberOfRole(myRole.getUniqueID(), true))
            response.write(" IS a <ROLE_DESCRIPTION>");
        else
            response.write(" IS NOT a <ROLE_DESCRIPTION>");
    regards
    -Kedar Kulkarni

  • Business Area-Cost Center error while doing VL09 (PGI Reversal)

    Hi Friends,
    Kindly go through the "ERROR" message and "IMPORTANT" point as mentioned below:This is happening while reversal of PGI in VL09.
    IMPORTANT: Just to make you aware, the cost center in error (CONSDSPL) was nowhere assigned in FS00 or OKB9. Also to state that at the time of this error some different cost center was assigned in FS00 which was having business area SUGR. So PGIs are picking up two business areas i.e. 1.DSPL (from Plant-Division-BussA setting) & 2. SUGR (for P&L GL from FS00)
    Following error coming while doing PGI reversal:
    ERROR -
    > BAL1/CONSDSPL CTR belong to business area DSPL not SUGR
    Message no. KI188
    Diagnosis
    Account assignment object BAL1/CONSDSPL, type CTR is assigned to business area DSPL. You made an explicit assignment to business area SUGR.
    System Response
    The posting row may contain only one business area.
    Procedure
    Perform one of the following actions.
    Make an explicit assignment to business area DSPL. To do so you must set the "Business area" field as entry-ready in Customizing.
    Enter an account assignment object assigned to business area SUGR.
    Change the assignment of BAL1/CONSDSPL to business area DSPL. Note the document number and continue processing the document after changing the assignment.
    PLEASE GUIDE. NEEDED ANSWER BADLY.

    Business area filed in cost center CONSDSPL is DSPL (what it should be). In this scenario, they have assigned SGPRODCTN cost center in GL master wherein business area is SUGR.
    That means, when accounting entry is getting generated, it will show two business areas. One will be fetched from "Plant-Division-BussA" setting (SPRO) & the other from GL. Also to make you aware that here the business area should be DSPL, but since they assigned wrong cost center in GL master, the entries are going to SUGR as well.
    Most important thing to notice out here is that when this error came "no default account assignment was done through OKB9" The cost center showing in error viz. CONSDSPL was nowhere assigned. So the question is from where the system is fetching this cost center?

  • Which module(s) does nipxirmu.dll belong to?

    NI-PAL Service Manager is throwing an error each time I boot Windows (WinXP SP2).  I believe the error message points to nipxirmu.dll as the problem.  Based on previous discussion in this forum, it seems like the prescription is to remove the offending module and then re-install.  But which module does this DLL belong to?
    Thanks,
    Nick
    "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." - Inigo Montoya

    Hi Nick,
    The nipxirmu.dll belongs to the DAQmx driver so you might have to reinstall NI-DAQmx. The latest version is DAQmx 8.0.1 and can the downloaded from this link.
    Sometimes is possible that the file that got corrupted is located under the Data folder in C:\Program Files\National Instruments\MAX. You can try deleting this folder before uninstalling DAQmx. Keep in mind that deleting this folder will erase any tasks or board names you had created in MAX. In order to delete the Data folder you have to stop the "nimxs.exe" from the Task Manager Processes. If this doesn't fix your problem, then you'll have uninstall/reinstall DAQmx. (Inconceivable!)
    Good luck,
    Tica T
    Applications Engineer

  • Cost center assinment to business area  very urgent

    Dear all
    i am doing business area wise balance sheet and profit and loss account assign ment for company code (which is already having existing data ) for this co code
    so for company code is not using busineess ares now they are going to introduse new business areas.
    when i new business area in cost center it is throwing this error
    Field change Business area is not possible (transaction data already exists)
    Message no. KS 134
    Diagnosis
    To ensure the consistency of existing data, you can only change object Business area if no transaction data exists in the change period; that is, neither plan data nor actual data has been posted.
    As transaction data already exists, it is not possible to change objects in this time period.
    Procedure
    If you still want to change the object, select a suitable change interval by choosing "Edit -> Analysis period...".
    arroding to procedure if i  go to Edit /Analysis period the error is
    field change business area is not possible (transaction data already exists )
    please guide me
    regards
    sadiq

    hi karl,
    u are corrct about the KS 134 and  RKACOR06 pogramm. i am not talking about this situation .
    hear the author posted the docu ment thread wher till now ther company is not using business areas . now they created new business area (eventhough till now they are not created thats why TGSB error is coming). for that only i said we can creat new anlysis period  with assiging of business area in cost cenetr master screen .only for new analysis period only
    not for existing transaction data posted period.
    i think my communication may confused u . sorry for that.
    any how
    thank you very much for ur input.
    kaindly inform the author in this way for new analysis period with business area.

  • Business are clearing

    Dear Guru's,
    I need help,  In my client place SAP version is 4.7,  from 2005 onwards they doing business are cleaing (F.5d, F.5e, F.5f), they are stoped in june, 2007, there business are wise balace sheet was not tallied.
    i cheked all the entries which was posted in before from 2006 i found some entries posted with one run identification no.,  in the next run some entries reversed which is posted earlier, but reversed check box not marked as a reversed entry posted.   I cheked patches of logistics and accounting patchlevel is 27.
    sap suggested patch level 29 update to run the business area clearing.    now we are updating patchlevel 28 and 29 (SAP_APPL - SAPKH47028 and SAP_APPL - SAPKH47029).  if we update this patch updation what impact will be the logistic side and accounting side.  After updation what activities we have to do.
    Regards
    Chandu

    Path level required for B.A clearing Path level 28 and 29 for version 4.7
    Regards
    chandu

  • Business Area required

    Hello,
    When trying to post the billing document from SD, I am getting the error F5808 'Field Bus. Area is a required field for G/L account XX12 430000'
    'The vaule for field "Bus. Area" in the interface to Financial Accounting is an initial value but you are requiered to make an entry in the field selection for G/L account "430000" in company code "XX12" linked to the field selection for posting key "01".'
    The SD document has an Internal Order which has the Business Area. The item has the business are filled in both Accounting and Account assigment tabs. However, it is still saying that the business area is required.
    The Business Area is set as mandatory in the Field Status Group assign to the account 430000, and I don't want to change that, as we want the business area mandatory.
    The account 430000 comes from the Customer Master.
    I am stack in here as I don't know where this problem comes from.
    I have done another SD order with the same customer, the same material, but different Company Code, Sales Organization and different Internal Order, and it works OK.
    The internal Orders have the same configuration.
    The G/L account 430000 is equal in both Companies
    Any idea of why it is not taking the Business Area for that company?
    Thanks a lot
    Edited by: ALBERTO CHAMOSO on Jul 26, 2011 10:54 AM

    Dear,
    Please check whether the Plant is assigned to Division and Business Area in SPRO> IMG>Enterprise Structure>Assignment> Sales & Distribution>Business Area Account Assignment>Assign Business Area to plant & Division.
    Hope this helps!!!!!!!
    Br,Vivek

  • Business area wise procurement

    Dear Experts ,
    Within a single company code & single plant , is it possible to have different  business areawise procurement for the same material?
    If so how to go about it ?
    regards
    Anis

    Dear,
    If you intend to generate internal business unit financial statements using the standard financial statement report in G/L accounting, you should note the following:
    All the company codes to which a specific business area is assigned must use the same operational chart of accounts. The operational chart of accounts specify the structure of the G/L accounts of a given company code, along with the cost element structure of the controlling area to which that company code is assigned.
    Country-specific requirements (for the chart of accounts and for the report structure for external rendering of accounts) can be fulfilled using the country-specific chart of accounts. That is, Sapo Ireland, Sapo Germany, and Sapo Czech Republic use the same operational chart of accounts but differing country-specific charts of accounts.
    Value flows needed for consolidation purposes are not permitted between companies in the same business unit. For Sapo the example enterprise this means that the delivery of printed circuit boards and casings can only be valued at the cost of goods manufactured. Transfer prices that differed from the cost of goods manufactured would lead to distortions in the internal business unit financial statements. You can perform profitability analyses for the supplier companies Sapo Czech Republic and Sapo Ireland only if you have also created a profit center scenario.
    Please check: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/5d/a77d77ec1111d2bc1000105a5e5b3c/frameset.htm
    Regards,
    Syed Hussain.

  • Asset master business area change

    I upload legacy assets using one business area now my user want to change the business area. I checked in asset master  it is in display mode only. what i can do? with out creating any new asset and transfer the values.is there any way to update the business area in asset master.

    there is a mass change option in the environment tab, you could have a look at that.
    Have you looked at the config, to see which fields can be changed?
    Also, I think you can change time dependant fields, which I presume business area would be part of.
    What happens when you view the asset in AS02?

  • Business Area in FI Doc Differs in COPA Doc

    Hello,
    In an FI document, business area was different against the business area recorded in COPA document. We could not trace how this happened.
    FI Doc   BA1
    PA Doc BA2
    To correct, we reversed the FI document. But, reversal did not meet the objective. Business Area in PA doc was then the same with FI doc.
    FI Doc   BA1
    PA Doc BA1
    So, there's now misstatement between the two.
    We adjusted the PA via KB41N (Manual Repost of Revenue). And it was then balanced.
    PA Doc BA2
    PA Doc BA1
    But KALC was ran at month end. CO is always reconciled with FI at month end. Hence, the adjustment made via KB41N was made with FI doc. FI & PA is again, not balanced. As if KB41N was not posted.
    How do you handle this difference as to business area in FI & PA?

    Hi
    There are 2 things to it
    1. 1st to rectify the situation, you can post a adjustment from KE21N.. where in you post a -ve posting for wrong BA and then normal posting for correct bus area
    Or, you can use KE26 also which will repost in one shot...
    2. 2nd is to identify the cause what triggered the wrong bus area in COPA... Check if you have some derivation rule in place which dictates a business area.... Or try to create the same scenario again and check whats the business area...
    In order to put a break point and check the derivation rule while posting billing document, use Function module KEDR_COPA_DERIVE.
    Set DEBUG-SHOW_TRACE to 'X' in order to get a trace list at the end. I think you do this in your user id in SU01 parameters
    Set DEBUG-BREAK_AT to the step number, say, 0035 if  you want to analyze step no 35 of KEDR. The system will stop in the process loop for that step.
    Regards
    Ajay M

Maybe you are looking for