Top level modules

hai.
i wrote vrilog code for a module and i tried to add that module inside the exu unit by making modification in the flist.exu.and using sims command i run the regression also. but the problem is that with out adding any extra module in sims.log it is showing 5 modules as top modules.but after adding my module it is showing that module also in that tpo level module list.
Top Level Modules:
jbus_monitor
jp_sjm
cmp_top
iobdg
core1_top_shell
this is hoe it was before adding my module.after adding my module and running regression it is like this.
Top Level Modules:
jbus_monitor
jp_sjm
cmp_top
sparc_exu_mymodule
iobdg
core1_top_shell.
Is this because the procedure of adding my module is not correct. if anybody knows this please replay.

hello, please directly contact the extension developers through the means provided at their homepage - they can likely give you more detailed guidance and are the only ones who can fix bugs or make necessary adjustments in the addon. thank you...

Similar Messages

Top level file : iop.v I need clock info.

Can sun help me out about all the clock domaims present
in Opensparc
It would be of great help for me to time constrain all the paths
properly
I need the clock info. if the following modules are considered as
top timing module
OpensparcT1
DRAM
IOBDG
JBUS

Please refer to various documents available in the doc directory :
1. OpenSPARCT1_DataSheet.pdf document describes the 3 clock domains
in the chip (CPU, JBus, DRAM).
2. OpenSPARCT1_DVGuide.pdf document describes the top level
modules in the iop.v.
UltraSPARC T1 Supplement to UltraSPARC 2005
Architecture on the website describes
various clock ratios available and how to program the clock ratios.

0CO_PC_PCP_03 Cost Estimate Itemizations at the top level

We are wanting to use extractor 0CO_PC_PCP_03 to extract the itemisation behind a cost estimate (The data in table CKIS). The issue with the extractor is that it breaks a multilevel BOM down to the basic levels (ie, itemisation explosion). However we want to have the data at the top level as it is displayed in a cost estimate itemisation. Is it possible to get this extractor to only extract the top level of the itemisation without further explosion of detail.
Thanks
Geoff ARmstrong

I have the same problem now.
I plan to create a generic datasource and extractor is a function module which is originated from KKBW_PCP_ITEMS_GET_ITEMIZATION.
Do you have got a better way now?

IViews are not updated in customized top level navigation

Hi experts,
I am working on External Facing Portal. I developed customized top level navigation. The problem is that the content area of External Facing portal is not refreshed. Although, i can see different navigationURLs but content area iView remains same. For testing purpose, i assigned role (which i created for anonymous access) to a new portal user. All pages/ivews/ for that role are working fine and content area is also updated when i click on different navigation. Remember that is standard portal not anonymous. It means through myserver:50100/irj/protal?NavigationTarget=navurl://cb0c473832f39033f88904647de63252 all navigation is working fine including content area but when i access External Facing Portal through myserver:50100/irj/protal/anonymous?NavigationTarget=navurl://cb0c473832f39033f88904647de63252 navigationURLs is updated but the content area remains same. Content area contains 1 page and page itself contains 1 iVew. I assigned that light page to Light Framework page.
Do i need to implement navigation connectors for that issue or i miss something?
waiting for your response.
regards
Abbas

Have you tried disabling the iView caching (check the iView and page properties). Your browser and proxy server (as you mention it is external facing) may also be caching the content, hence the reason when you use your user ID and the Java restart occurs everything is reset correctly.
I know when doing Visual Composer developments that SAP EP caches the Function Module interfaces and that in the development environment I needed to change parameters in Visual Admin for the VC component lifetime to handle these. It could well be that you are referencing components that have lifetime keep alive set for them in the environment too. Refer to the API / SDK documentation if you suspect this could be the case for you too.
What exactly is the iView in the content area doing? Is it just a transactional iView or is it a custom iview?
If you can perhaps try putting on an http trace or monitor the NWA logs to determine if any issues exist. You Java VM may also require some more fine tuning in the external facing scenario - the GC may not be collecting items efficiently.

"Top level objects not released" warning when accessing LabVIEW adapter through API

I'm having a problem when using the TestStand API in LabVIEW: I'm trying to get the VI path for a TestStand test step, but I'm getting the "Top level objects not released properly" warning. It doesn't look like I'm forgetting to close something, but obviously I am. Snippet is below, and warning text follows. Anyone have any ideas?
I'm using LabVIEW 2010 and TestStand 2010.
This forum has been a huge help. Thanks to everyone!
-Joe
References to PropertyObjects were not released properly. Total number of objects: 418 Number of top-level objects: 7
Note: Some top-level objects may be included if they are referenced by an incorrectly released top-level object. For example, an unreleased SequenceContext object references a SequenceFile object.
The following top-level objects were not released:
Type Definitions [6 object(s) not released] Type Definition #1: Name: FlexGStepAdditions
Type Definition #2: Name: VIParameter
Type Definition #3: Name: VIParameterElement
Type Definition #4: Name: NI_LabVIEWParameterResult
Type Definition #5: Name: Expression
Type Definition #6: Name: Path
And the following uncategoried objects: LabVIEWModule (FlexGStepAdditions) Name: SData
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Yep, that worked. I thought that Variant To Data was just converting the module reference to the LabVIEWModule data type, but apparently I was wrong... This TS leak checker is sure making me learn about how to properly close references... I've been programming memory leaks for years!
I was also having problems with LabVIEW crashing after the VI ran, and fixing the order of the close references fixed that, too.
Working code is below.
Thanks a lot (again) Doug.
-Joe

Getting top level permissions?

Hello.
We have a bunch of folders on a fileserver that has folders shared directly to people instead of AD Groups. I want to get all top level permissions (IE the ones not inherited) and display the top level folder("the root folder") and the usernames
which have access to it.
With that information i will create Groups and share to the Group et cetera.
Is this possible to do powershell? How would i go about doing it?
Any tips welcome!

You could try
this module's Get-AccessControlEntry function. There is a screenshot on its download page that shows sample output. It also has a switch parameter to only show non-inherited ACEs. You could look at permissions at the root folder only, or you could show
non-inherited ACEs for any folders under the root:
Get-AccessControlEntry c:\root -NotInherited
dir c:\root -recurse | Get-AccessControlEntry -NotInherited
The results can be exported to a CSV, where each line will include, among other things, the path, the type of ACE (allow, deny), the principal, the access mask, and whether or not it is inherited.
You can also use the Select-Object and/or Group-Object cmdlets on the results to further analyze the permissions.
Let me know if you're interested in the module and have any questions about it.

[svn:fx-trunk] 9924: Empty design layers with id' s are now persisted and declared as top level properties.

Revision: 9924
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-09-02 09:11:03 -0700 (Wed, 02 Sep 2009)
Log Message:
Empty design layers with id's are now persisted and declared as top level properties.
QE notes: None
Doc notes: None
Bugs: SDK-22904
Reviewer: Paul
Tests run: Checkin
Is noteworthy for integration: No
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-22904
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/mxml/InterfaceCompiler.java
    flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/mxml/analyzer/SyntaxAnalyzer.java
    flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/mxml/builder/DocumentBuilder.java
    flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/mxml/dom/DocumentNode.java
    flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/mxml/rep/MxmlDocument.java

I seem to have fixed it by putting <div class="clearfloat"></div> after the navigation bar?

Why do the LabVIEW examples that use the queue design have one loop in the top level and all the others as subvis?

Specifically the Weather Monitor example under connectivity/Web Services and the FPGA design examples.
There are several parallel loops. One of the parallel loops will be in the top level VI. The others are all in sub-VIs. After the third example I was looking at it seemed obvious this was being done as a standard, but I don't know why it matters.
Why not all of them as SubVIs? Why not all of them as top level loops? (Well OK maybe not that one.)

For me, it depends on what is happening in the parallel loops. When I have modules that just need to run in parallel with the main loop, it helps reusability to have it a a subVI call. I can then just copy that library to another project and use it.
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines

Possible to Have ToC Default to Show Only Top Level (collapse sublevels)?

Howdy!
I'll bet I'm not the only one wishing for this. Let's say you're using Captivate 4's Table of Contents feature with a longish movie of Cp slides, which is chunked into bite-size sections content-wise. In the ToC, though, you can't mimic that same organization scheme; at least, the learner would first need to collapse all the ToC folders you've created so they see only the top-level listing.
This can be a critical issue: keeping the at-first-glance list in the ToC brief enough to be inviting to learners, yet allowing learners to drive which details are currently visible.
A movie's topical hierarchy could be along these lines, for example ...
Section 1 - National Brands
What are National Brands?
Why Are They Important to Our Business?
Working with Nat. Brands
Practice Your Knowledge
Section 2 - International Brands
What are International Brands?
Why Are They Important to Our Business?
Working with Intl. Brands
Practice Your Knowledge
You'd like to organize the ToC to show only the section titles (1st level) and to suppress the 2nd-level detail (slide titles) until the learner chooses to expand the folder to see those details.
I've tried things like grouping the slides into sections in the Storyboard view and organizing the slides into sections strictly within the ToC -- both to no avail.
Has anyone solved for this need yet?
I'm all ears, and you'd be doing learners of the world a huge favor.
Thanks!

Hi, Jim.
Thanks for being 'on the case' and looking into this so quickly. Your
findings are encouraging, although my user base is generally working with
IE 6 and FP8 or 9.
Since the only thing I may influence is getting IT to help push out FP10,
I'm hoping it's more of a player- than a browser-version issue.
I'll test things out by Monday and let you know the results. Wish me luck!
Dave
                                                                                From:       Jim Leichliter <[email protected]>
To:         Dave Tressler <[email protected]>
Date:       03/26/2010 06:02 PM
Subject:    Possible to Have ToC Default to Show Only Top Level (collapse
              sublevels)?
Dave,
I just tested this on my local web server and it worked fine. I created a
blank project with 8 slides. Created my TOC with grouping... 2 slides in
each group. I turned on self paced learning. I tried with and without the
widget and it picked up where I left off in either case. See
https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B86WuEq6SVwRNWIwMjhjODctMjE2Yy00MWE2LWI5YzEtMGQxYzNjOWQ0Z mI2&hl=en.
I published using FP10 and IE8 to view. Notice any difference between
your project and this one?
Thanks,
Jim Leichliter

Inactive component cost not rolled up to top level item

Hi
Our scenario is as follows: we have a top level item with a BOM. And some components of the BOM are having material status u2018inactiveu2019. Inactive means materials will not procured and sold, however we could have inventory which can be consumed in production of other materials. In other words inactive items are like old items. These inactive items already have costing value. And we donu2019t want to recost inactive items.
Having described above scenario, the requirement here is when we run costing for top level item, system should take costing value of inactive items and roll up into top level item costing which is NOT happening now. Client donu2019t want to recost inactive items. The reason for not recosting inactive items is the recosting could change cost of inactive items significantly. We are using 4.7 version and standard costing.
Would appreciate any ideas or suggestions in this regard.
thanx
Sunil

Thanks Young for the reply.
We already set 'do not cost' indicator for inactive components. And these inactive components do have standard costs valid up 10 12/31/2999. It seems bom explosion is excluding these materials. it is ok to exclude. However the existing standard cost of these inactive components did not roll up in to top level. when I checked the costing status log, it says material ABCDF123 in plant 3344 has material status 40: Inactive.
I checked BOM as well and inactive component is flagged as 'relevant for costing'.
We are using following valuation varaiant
Strategy Sequence -> 1. Planned Price 1 2.Standard Cost
Transfer Control - Complete Transfer
thnx

How do I use CreateBookmarksFromGroupTree and NOT guid in the name for my top level?

Post Author: Barbdcg
CA Forum: Deployment
I have a report that I have created that uses uses groups and I wanted export a PDF using the CreateBookmarksFromGroupTree option. While that works, I get an ugly top level bookmark name that starts with the name of my report, then followed by a GUID;
Report {49E72CC5-7FFD-44F8-831B-EA8F543F7D82}.rpt
So, how do I Put in a name of my own choosing as the top-level bookmark or at least get rid of the guid?
Any help or suggestions would be appricated.
Thanks,
Barb

Post Author: Barbdcg
CA Forum: Deployment
Still no answer??? I can not figure this one out!! HELP!!!

How do I use CreateBookmarksFromGroupTree and NOT get a "temp_" for my top level?

I have a report that I have created that uses uses groups and I wanted export a PDF using the CreateBookmarksFromGroupTree option. While that works, I get an ugly top level bookmark name that starts with "temp_" then followed by two GUIDs "temp_13fef8e3-30ec-4bc5-ba77-b55d23c95e8f {87823BCB-7789-407C-8A7F-5096BE07A83E}".
So, how do I:
1) Get rid of this top level so it matches the Crystal Viewer (which has multiple top level bookmarks)
2) Put in a name of my own choosing as the top-level bookmark.
<!break>
Any help or suggestions would be appricated.
Thanks,
Jim

I would very much like to know how to avoid this also!!!

Front panel of a vi pops up when i start my top level vi how can i stop this

i have a vi that whos front panel should display when the user clicks a front panel button(test instructions),
however this vi pops up when i run the top level vi. I can manually close the vi, but how do i stop this?
i tried modifying the Sub VI Set up properties, but that doesnt work.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi jknapp,
As egraham has pointed out, you can customize the window appearance of your sub VI from the VI Properties. If you go to File » VI Properties, then under Category select Window Appearance and then Customize..., you should be able to control how the sub VI appears. Hope this helps!
Taylor G.
Product Support Engineer
National Instruments
www.ni.com/support

How can I close all open subVI front panels, without closing my top level VI front panel when all VIs are built into executables?

I'm using the code shown in the sample VI discussed here: http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/353A696A3F393D9B86256E8B007A2912
to close all open VIs except my top level VI. My top level VI is actually a separate executable and the sub-VIs are their own executables. All reside under the same project. It works very well if I'm running in LabView but will not work when I build them. I added all the sub-VIs to the Always Include box in my top level VIs properties which did nothing. I also tried adding them to the Startup VIs box. This allowed me to close them all programmatically from the top level VI but it also open all the VIs at once (which was expected and not desired). I think the problem is the executables are not able to see outside their own memory space so the top-level VI never finds any other open front panels to close. Is this correct? Is there another way to go about doing this?
Thanks!

Where do I begin…..
I’m using a “server” to control 4 “client” PCs. My server opens references to 4 VIs on each client then executes them sequentially. So on a normal day, the server will run everything itself and I will have no contact with the clients. But on a several occasions, I’ve needed the ability to walk up to one of the clients and run just one of the 4 VIs.
We are updating from LabView 6.1 to 8.5 and we want to run executables rather than VIs for various reasons. I have a new VI running on the client PCs who’s only function is to initialize the shared variables and open/close the VIs. I initially thought of making the remaining 4 VIs sub-VIs but I will loose the ability to run them individually. I think I would also have to rewrite the VI running on the server since the 4 references it originally opened do not exist. I don’t think you can open a reference to a sub-VI on another PC. Can you???
As you can see, this is a huge mess. I’m still pretty new with LabView so any help you can provide would be great.

Unable to set a top-level property object

Hey guys
I've made a little sequence to fetch data from a XML file. In that XML file, there is some informations (entries) (IP addresses, port numbers, etc) about 4 different types of devices(sections are the devices names). The first section of the XML tells me the NAMES of the devices I have to configure. The type of each device is located in the entries of each device. Each device has its own information and I can have more than one device of a type. In teststand, I've created custom data types (containers with empty fields) for each type of device I need.
I want to dynamically create the devices that the XML file tells me to configure as fileglobal variables and populate them with their own config informations (entries of the XML file). I'm creating new fileglobal of the type I want using PropertyObject step and I'm creating an alias of that fileglobal that I'm passing in parameter to a subsequence who's getting infos from XML. Here, everything is OK.
The problem occurs when I want to configure 2 or more objects of the same type. At the SetProperty step (where i'm creating the fileglobal variable) teststand gives me the error:
"Unable to set a top-level property object to another object. Error accessing item 'Parameters.DeviceToInitStruct'."
Is there any ways to avoid that problem and creating to variable of the same type ?
thanks

Hi
I finally got rid of that problem.
Instead of using a PropertyObject.Clone step, I used a statement who's just copy the "MasterObject" into a "CloneObject" and i'm working with that copy. So the sequence can now create devices of the same type without any conflict with the first device.
i'll post here a short example to show how i did... maybe it'll be useful for someone...
regards

Top level modules

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for