Inactive component cost not rolled up to top level item

Hi
Our scenario is as follows: we have a top level item with a BOM. And some components of the BOM are having material status u2018inactiveu2019. Inactive means materials will not procured and sold, however we could have inventory which can be consumed in production of other materials. In other words inactive items are like old items. These inactive items already have costing value. And we donu2019t want to recost inactive items.
Having described above scenario, the requirement here is when we run costing for top level item, system should take costing value of inactive items and roll up into top level item costing which is NOT happening now. Client donu2019t want to recost inactive items. The reason for not recosting inactive items is the recosting could change cost of inactive items significantly. We are using 4.7 version and standard costing.
Would appreciate any ideas or suggestions in this regard.
thanx
Sunil

Thanks Young for the reply.
We already set 'do not cost' indicator for inactive components. And these inactive components do have standard costs valid up 10 12/31/2999. It seems bom explosion is excluding these materials. it is ok to exclude. However the existing standard cost of these inactive components did not roll up in to top level. when I checked the costing status log, it says material ABCDF123 in plant 3344 has material status 40: Inactive.
I checked BOM as well and inactive component is flagged as 'relevant for costing'.
We are using following valuation varaiant
Strategy Sequence -> 1. Planned Price 1 2.Standard Cost
Transfer Control - Complete Transfer
thnx

Similar Messages

Item cost not found for one or more items - Inventory Posting

Good Day Mentors,
My user has encountered an error during Inventory Posting and its "Item cost not found for one or more items".
The specific Message ID from SAP's System Message Log is 10001287.
I found a similar post which addresses this error here.
But unfortunately it did not help me solve my user's problem.
I already checked if the items had a defined "Item Cost" in the Item Master Data Inventory Tab, and they all have "Item Cost" defined.
I'm not sure if this will help, but below is the Inventory Audit Report of one of the items that is throwing the "Item cost not found" error.
I am not a business consultant neither am I literate in accounting, so thanks for the patience.
SAP Version: 9.0 PL5
Valuation Method: Moving Average
Thanks in advance!
Sean

Hi Augusto and Raviraj,
I've already verified in our production database the points you made:
- Is the "Manage Item cost per warehouse" selected in the Basic Initialization Screen?
YES
- Is the "Manage Inventory by Warehouse" ticked/checked in the "Inventory Data" tab of the "Item Master Data" screen?
YES
* I apologize for not have been able to give this information upfront.
Anyway, the database only has one warehouse at the moment.
I've checked the items, like the item in the screen shot above, and it does have an item cost.
Below is the screenshot of the sample item from my original post,
Thanks in advance!
Sean

Worksets not visible in the top level navigation

Hi all,
I installed ESS business package and.ESS 600 sp08.Everything is fine but the worksets of the ESS role are not coming in the top level navigation (2nd level).They are visible in the detailed navigation.
I checked the option in the worksets .
the property invisible in navaigation area .It is set to No.So no issues.
Still it is not visible
Any clues please.
Thanx and Regards,
rajesh

Hi,
As Rightly said
1) First copy ESS folder created in "Content provided by SAP" under "Portal Content".
2) Copy standard ESS Role for u r customization
3) Open Custom Role "Employee Self Service"
4) Property Category : Navigation
5) Check Entry Point property
It shuld be NO for Role but It shuld be YES for Workset ESS under it as per standard then Its Fine
6) Then Assign this role to u r User thru UserAdmin
7) Refresh
It shuld work !!!!
Reward Points !!! If helpful
Edited by: PK on Mar 25, 2008 11:59 AM

DNS Server does not resolve new generic Top Level Domain names- CNR configuration issue?

Hi all,
I am not sure if this is the correct community to post this question, but I will give it a try. I noticed that the users of my network cannot resolve web sites using new top level domain names, like ".education", ".international", etc. I have an internal DNS server made by Infoblox and a Cisco CNR v6.3.3.1 as an external DNS server. Infoblox uses CNR as its forwarder and CNR uses the root DNS servers for queries.
I would think that CNR was the problem because it is an obsolete product but after speaking with a fellow engineer at another organization where they still use an older version of CNR than mine, they have no problems at all. So now I am thinking it is a setting either on Infoblox, or on CNR I need to change. I can see Infoblox is forwarding the requests to CNR but that's about it. I am not sure if CNR is discarding the request. When I do an nslookup from a PC in my network it does not matter if I set my DNS server to be the Infoblox or the CNR. Neither resolves the URL.
Then again, no matter what I lookup using the CNR as my DNS, I only get a response with the root DNS names and IPs!
Any help is appreciated!

Hi Constantinos,
Have you taken a look at the infoblox community site? We've just reposted your question there and alerted some internal SMEs that should provide a solution soon.
https://community.infoblox.com/forum/ddi/dns-server-does-not-resolve-new-generic-top-level-domain-names-cnr-configuration-issue
Best,
Eric

S_ALR_87013532 report -plan cost not rolling upto the WBS/Project level

Dear All,
Plan cost from production orders is not rolling up to the WBS/Project level in S_ALR_87013532 ( Plan/Actual Variance report).
Where as plan cost from network is properly rolling up to the WBS/Project level in the above report.
Please suggest what could be the reason for this issue. Is any configuration needs to be done for this.
Thanks & Regards,
Vishal

Dear sir,
Thanks for the reply & sorry for late response from my side.
OPSV settings are already maintained in our system.
Some how i realized later that cost are actaully getting rolled to the WBS level, but we have observed one more discrepancy.
Example -
Production order "X" value - 100 ( as seen through co03)
Production order "X"value- 40 ( as seen through report s_alr_87013532).
We found that in report s_alr_87013532 , although my total producton order value of 100 is represented at the WBS /Project level, but at the production order level , it is showing value of 40.
On further analysis we found that for production order X
Materail cost- 60
Labour cost-40
The material cost of 60 is not getting fetched against production order "X" in report " S_ALR_87013532".
There are very few cases , where such discrepancy is seen.
Kindly suggest.
Regards,
Vishal

IViews are not updated in customized top level navigation

Hi experts,
I am working on External Facing Portal. I developed customized top level navigation. The problem is that the content area of External Facing portal is not refreshed. Although, i can see different navigationURLs but content area iView remains same. For testing purpose, i assigned role (which i created for anonymous access) to a new portal user. All pages/ivews/ for that role are working fine and content area is also updated when i click on different navigation. Remember that is standard portal not anonymous. It means through myserver:50100/irj/protal?NavigationTarget=navurl://cb0c473832f39033f88904647de63252 all navigation is working fine including content area but when i access External Facing Portal through myserver:50100/irj/protal/anonymous?NavigationTarget=navurl://cb0c473832f39033f88904647de63252 navigationURLs is updated but the content area remains same. Content area contains 1 page and page itself contains 1 iVew. I assigned that light page to Light Framework page.
Do i need to implement navigation connectors for that issue or i miss something?
waiting for your response.
regards
Abbas

Have you tried disabling the iView caching (check the iView and page properties). Your browser and proxy server (as you mention it is external facing) may also be caching the content, hence the reason when you use your user ID and the Java restart occurs everything is reset correctly.
I know when doing Visual Composer developments that SAP EP caches the Function Module interfaces and that in the development environment I needed to change parameters in Visual Admin for the VC component lifetime to handle these. It could well be that you are referencing components that have lifetime keep alive set for them in the environment too. Refer to the API / SDK documentation if you suspect this could be the case for you too.
What exactly is the iView in the content area doing? Is it just a transactional iView or is it a custom iview?
If you can perhaps try putting on an http trace or monitor the NWA logs to determine if any issues exist. You Java VM may also require some more fine tuning in the external facing scenario - the GC may not be collecting items efficiently.

Project Commitment Cost not visible for Purchase Orders with Item Categry Q

Hello All
I have a problem. My project commitment cost is not visible for PO's with Item Category Q. I assume that as the stock can be issued against any WBS elements I might not be able to see the cost against a single WBS element. But the cost should get recorded against the project right? If so where can I see it?
Request your help with this problem
Regards
Renjith

Hello
Could you please explain how to maintain that?
Best Regards
Renjith

Data not rolling up to Parent Level

Working on BPC 7.5 Level 10
Member set of report are on base level.
Data Present on 2014.AUG but not rolling up to parent.

Naveen,
I am storing Data with Periodic Measures.
Jan          Feb          Mar          Q1
100          50                              0          --- Q1 will be 0 as your ACCTYPE is AST/LEQ
Now when i change the Measures in REPORT to YTD or Keep Periodic(By default AST and LEQ account type will refer to YTD).
Jan          Feb          Mar          Q1
100          50                             0
As per the logic explained by you
--> Data present for JAN,FEB on Periodic 100,50 - Yes . But when you say Feb Data is 50 it means your value has reduced from 100 in Jan to 50 in Feb which means the periodic value of Feb is -50. Dont get confused. For AST/LEQ value of 50 in Feb means the total balance till Feb is 50. You are getting 0 in Q1 as your March value has become 0 which means your total balance at the end of March is 0 and hence your Q1 ending March shows value 0. If you post something in March then your Q1 will show the same value.
For AST/LEQ the Q1 value is same as the March value and Year.TOTAL value is same as Dec Value.
-->Data should be when YTD JAN,FEB 100,150. For AST/LEQ ACCTYPES Measure YTD and Periodic show same values as AST and LEQ are YTD in nature by default.
Nikhil

0CO_PC_PCP_03 Cost Estimate Itemizations at the top level

We are wanting to use extractor 0CO_PC_PCP_03 to extract the itemisation behind a cost estimate (The data in table CKIS). The issue with the extractor is that it breaks a multilevel BOM down to the basic levels (ie, itemisation explosion). However we want to have the data at the top level as it is displayed in a cost estimate itemisation. Is it possible to get this extractor to only extract the top level of the itemisation without further explosion of detail.
Thanks
Geoff ARmstrong

I have the same problem now.
I plan to create a generic datasource and extractor is a function module which is originated from KKBW_PCP_ITEMS_GET_ITEMIZATION.
Do you have got a better way now?

Componant cost not picking in production order

Hi,
Componanat cost is not picking in production order, when i m creating plan order to production order in make to order scenario.
At the same time when i m creating production order by CO01 its working.
Please let me know whats missing?
Tara

Hi,
Thanks for sharing thoughts.
Issue resolved.
(SPRO-Sales and Distribution-Basic Functions-Account Assignment/Costing-Maintain Requirements Classes For Costing/Account Assignment-execute-for req class 040-Account assignment catagory -M & Valuation-M)
Tara
Edited by: tara bhapkar on Jul 7, 2011 2:52 PM

UNPLANNED DELIVERY COST NOT PROPERLY DISTRIBUTED TO MATERIAL LINE ITEM

Hi ,
Presently my system is Configured to distribute Unplanned Delivery Costs among invoice items,but it is not properly distributed among line item while doing the posting.
What may be the problem,Is there any additional settings to be checked ?or in which areas i need to check? Plz Help regarding this.
Thanks,
Raju

Hi,
Plz chek the SPRO settings for unplanned delivery cost. You need to maintain the company code
in SPRO - Material Management - Logistics Invoice Verification -Incoming invoices - Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
regards

On my mac, I just installed lion. My emails now roll up to a top level when it is a group message. I do not want that. I want to receive each email separate

I'm not sure where to write my question. It is a display question. I just installed lion on my Mac. Now my emails roll into a top level group email, instead on listing all my emails. How do I change that? Thanks Donna

You are running Lion or Mountain Lion? Your profile shows Mountain Lion.
I'm on Mountain Lion, but this may have been the same in Lion? A wild guess: do you have this choice in your menu bar in Mail - organize by conversation (and is it checked):

MobileMe top-level folders not accepting mail messages

Strange thing...
Now that iPhone has "push" mail, I decided to take all my mail from Mail.app on my mac up to my MobileMe account. I wanted to do this as-is, but it's not quite that simple... However, the whole folder structure and all e-mails therein are now happily living in MobileMe.
Except that they are not! All the Top-Level folders that contain other folders are now white in Mail.app, and don't exist at all in MobileMe. It's as if all folders were one level higher than they should be - all folders directly contained in a white parent folder appear as top level folders in MobileMe!! On the iPhone, they do exist, but their names are greyed out. Both in Mail.app and on the iPhone, they are empty and you cannot add mail messages to them even though, in Mail.app "on my Mac" they still contain mail and will happily accept mail messages...
What gives? Is there something I need to do to change them from "folder folders" into "mail folders that happen to also have folders in them"???
G>

Not a single answer or post on this...
I decided to create new folders and add a dummy place holder message in them, then move over all the subfolders to this one. There was a bit of strange behaviour when synchronising with MobleMe (old folder disappeared without my deleting it, etc) but now all is well and all my top level folders can accept mails.
During the process, it seems like MobileMe didn't know that these folder existed - when renaming or deleting them, I do an error saying that they did not exist. Indeed, on MobileMe, they did not exist and this resulted in all the first level subfolders being at the top level in me.com - very messy. It looks a lot better now!
G>

How to have some top level menu items not be hyperlinks

I have a navigation band where 5 of the 6 top level items need to NOT be hyperlinks but simply "category titles" that you mouseover to display the submenu - which are the links to web pages.
An example of this is on the Amazon.com home page - the items under "Shop All Departments" has categories that are not clickable, but when you mouseover display the clickable submenu.
Is it possible to customize some but not all of the top menu items and how?
What do I need to modify in the CSS so that the top "category title" looks/behave the submenu (same font color/bgcolor changes) but no active hyperlink?

Here is a link to my pagewhere I am testing the navigation. Currently there is only this one page and I have <a href="#"> for the links.
The only menu item that should be clickable in the top level is "Contact"
Everything in the second and third level (Events > Research >...) needs to be clickable
Everything is working as I want except that "Research" needs to be clickable
- and I would like to have the clickable item text be underline when in the hover state but I want to get the base navigation working first
The closest matching code I found in the CSS is:
#MenuBar1 li .MenuBarItemSubmenu,
#MenuBar1 li ul li .MenuBarItemSubmenu {
cursor: default;
If I remove this, all the top level items become clickable. Let me know if there is other information you need. I super appreciate your help with this!

A top level menu item should display its active state if any of its submenu items are active

Example case: I'm designing a Muse site which is basically a portfolio of our work. We design books, doing page layout and covers. We have numerous book categories and sub categories which I put in a horizontal menu. When a given top level category menu item doesn't have a submenu, it is a hyperlink and it displays active state when the browser displays its linked page. But when a given page is displayed from a submenu link, its top level menu item does NOT display active state. I think it should.
For example, we have a "Nostalgia" category which has "Film" and "TV" subcategories. Because the menu item, "Nostalgia" has a submenu containing "Film" and "TV", the label "Nostalgia" is not a hyperlink. The submenu attached to it has the two hyperlinked items "Film" and "TV". When the browser is displaying either linked page, the submenu is hidden. So it would be nice if the top level item, "Nostalgia" would display in an active state.

Hello Daniel,
As of now this feature is not there in Adobe Muse.
I would suggest you to please log this as a feature request in our "Ideas for features in Adobe Muse" section. (http://forums.adobe.com/community/muse/ideas)
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Sachin

Inactive component cost not rolled up to top level item

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for