Total No. of Post Decrease.

Hi,
My total posts when i was check last time 2181 before One Week.
and now today my total no of post is 2161 "01-july-07".
Please could you tell me what wrong with my total no.of posting.
Please Feedback
Thanks & Regards
Taj

Hi,
Thanks for response.
but problem is still exists my post contiune decrease.
Hope OTN administration staff solve this problem soon.
Regards
Taj

Similar Messages

Total no. of Posts count - reset

Hi,
My total no. of posts count has been reset and from today morning the count started from "1".
Pls Help !!
Regards,
Sridhar

Hi Divya,
Thanks for your post.
Try to get fields count in collection using below code snippet:
TfsTeamProjectCollection tfs =
new
TfsTeamProjectCollection(new
Uri("collectionURL"));
tfs.EnsureAuthenticated();
WorkItemStore workitemstore = tfs.GetService<WorkItemStore>();
FieldDefinitionCollection fields = workitemstore.FieldDefinitions;
// get fields count in this collection
Console.WriteLine(fields.Count);
//get each field name
foreach(FieldDefinition
field in fields)
Console.WriteLine(field.Name);
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

How to extract the Incometax,Ed.cess,Surcharge,Total tax after post to acco

DeaR Experts,
Im into HR Module.
At present we are going to develop a customized report on TDS for a particular month.According to our requirements we have to extract the details from only the posting documents,which were already posted to accounts.
For this we need to extract the amounts of /460(Total Tax),/4MT(Basic Tax),/4ME,/4MH(EDucational cess) wagetypes.
How and where we have to extract/fetch the amounts to have these values in the customized report.
Please advice any Transaction code availble for to view the details of all abovve wagetypes.Through PCP0 we can view only the /460 only.Kindly guide me to move furthur.
Please advice.
Regards,
Vi Sai

Hi,
There are various possible ways to have the said details.
You may develop customized employee TDS register with the help of Abaper.
Moreover, PCPO is posting document only.
Use pc_payresult t-code which have all break ups which you requires, from where Abaper will develop the report.
Secondly You can also use PC00_M40_F24 which is a standard form program where you will get employee wise TDS break up details for TDS return filing.
Hope this will help.
R/s
Valay Pandya

My total number of posts has been cut drastically.

Hello
I enjoy posting to the discussions here. sometimes, I'll open the discussions on my Powerbook while watching TV, and I'll answer a few questions while I watch. It's fun.
One of the nifty little incentives was waiting until I got to 600 posts so that I could use my own avitar (among other things). Well, with the advent of this new forum, my profile says that I only posted 42 messages. What gives? I was above 500 posts before the switch, how can I get those back?
Thanks,
----------------S

Hello Steve,
Registered: 30-Nov-2007 ?
Congratulations !
Yes, the new Discussions software shows only the posts that are still online, but the total count is logged somewhere, and will be taken into account to calculate the new Points system when it's ready.
Nobody knows though, when exactly all the bugs will be fixed.
Not long ago for example we've been six months without "votes refreshing"...
So be patient, in case this happens again for the "Reputations".
HTH
Axl

New number of posts bug(?) + question; no #100, and total # of posts vary

New number of posts bug(?) + question; no number 100, and total number of posts vary
Intrigued by Tuttle's new attempt to join Niel's old habit to keep his own total number of posts count, I went and start counting my posts since the New Discussions. Because I saved my latest Old Discussions Post-and-Points info, I can see what are the previously-still-online ones (the pre- 14-Nov-2005 01:31 GMT ones), and I know exactly what was my "real" total number of posts before 14-Nov-2005 (2446).
My New Discussions posts number however, is quite uncertain.
Firstly, when I use the "My Posts" link on the right, then clicking on and on on the "Next" link,
my "Viewing 91-100 of 586 -- Pages" shows 91-99 instead of 91-100
(= should show 10 posts, shows 9 posts)
then I go on clicking Next Next Next, and I see the same missing counts happen elsewhere:
my posts number 100, 259, 260, 370, 390, 520, 558, 559, 560, 578, 579, and 580 are missing too.
Note that I wouldn't bother doing all this, and I would have thought it's just very old posts that are automatically deleted like in the Old Discussions,
BUT,
the problem is that when I choose to see all my posts together on the same page
(by using the start=0&range=600 suffix in the URL)
I get a total number of posts that is different (570).
A third way to quickly see all posts without having to load too big page
(using the start=0&range=300 suffix in the URL then only one "Next" click)
shows yet another, different again, number of total posts (573).
And my "official" total number of posts is (586).
Dear HOSTS,
- If this can be used as a bug report to fix a counting problem, glad to help.
- If there is no bug, I have two(+) questions then:
1) Was my post number 100 deleted?
(should be around 27-Nov-2005 18:00 GMT)
Also:
I thought the Total Posts number that we see in "My Public Profile" or under the avatar in each post (586), was only the number of posts still online.
- if it is the case, then there are no automatically deleted old posts anymore?
- if old posts are automatically deleted like before, this number should vary?
- if it doesn't vary (it just grows by one per new post), AND at the same time old posts are actually automatically deleted,
it has to show the "real" total number of posts then,
(as it is now, a total starting from the Old-Discussions-still-online-posts, it makes no sense),
that is,
the total posts in the New Discussions PLUS the total posts since first registration in the Old Discussions.
So,
2) What does it show exactly?
Thanks again for all the great work!
Axl
220? 221?

Thank you Andreas,
Your confirmation about the "post #100 bug" does help.
"As for your other missing posts - I guess Tuttle's assessment that they might be deleted is probably right..."
Yes, that makes sense and that's what I'm trying to figure in my OP, but then,
after I posted my "#221/2667 post" (11-Dec-2005 21:51 GMT), my originally missing #
259, 260, 370, 390, 520, 558, 559, 560, 578, 579, and 580
should have become
260, 261, 371, 391, 521, 559, 560, 561, 579, 580, and 581
right? (forget the #100: this one we know for sure it's a bug)
Or if the software counts them from the first (now that would have been a good start) instead of starting from the most recent,
they should become
258, 259, 369, 389, 519, 557, 558, 559, 577, 578, and 579
Well, that's not what happened. Now the missing # are
259, 260, 370, 390, 400, 520, 559, 560, 570, 579, and 580
(in addition to the same #100) (#558 and 578 not missing anymore).
As you can see, there is no logic:
It doesn't work as a simple numerotation of StillOnlinePosts, no matter the order
(otherwise there would simply be a straight count from 1 to 575 (=587-12).
It looks indeed like it shows which old posts are being automatically deleted. That the numbers are quite the same would simply show that the old posts dates were so close, of course they are deleted (six months later) almost at the same time,
BUT,
if it was the case, there would never be LESS deleted posts between two StillOnlinePosts, like it happens for example between my StillOnlinePosts #557 and #561.
Please note: of course I stick to the same method to make all my counts. Not manually modifying the URL, just using the default Next-Next-Next- clicking...
Modifying URL would add yet more differences in the differences!..
Dear Hosts,
Too bad it doesn't help looking yourself at my "My Posts", as everything changes each time I'm adding a reply somewhere.
Perhaps a good way to troubleshoot this would be to start from a very simple basis:
--> "name" the posts with a number, starting from the oldest.
This way, for example my "#1" post (11-Dec-2005 21:51 GMT in this thread) would be named "221" in the New Discussions, or "2667" if you start from my Registration date.
At the moment, it is very difficult to figure what fault comes from the "#100 post bug" and what fault comes from another possible counting bug...
Then the New Discussions "fluctuating" refreshing delay too, possibly messes the counts...
Thanks!
Axl
223/2669

Total system memory *decreases* when using invidia 9600M GPU

I have 4 GB of RAM in my MBP. I understand that when using the integrated video processor (invidia 9400M), 250 MB of system RAM are set aside for the video memory. So when my total system RAM showed 3.8 GB, that made sense. However, when I switched to the 9600M GPU which has its own 256 MB of dedicated VRAM, total system memory actually decreased to 3729 MB!
How can that be, and why isn't does the total amount of RAM installed show 4096 MB?

Hi Odysseus,
I am not completely sure here, but it sounds like you are seeing an issue related to 32-bit addressing. I am not well-versed in Mac architecture, but I when it comes to PC architecture. With a system that uses 32-bit kernel (like Mac OS X and 32-bit versions of Windows), it can natively access up to 4 GBs of RAM (232bytes). Here is where I get sketchy, I know that 32-bit WIndows (including Vista) uses what is termed a flat memory model. In order for the system to access the video RAM, the kernel maps the video memory over the upper addressees of the 4 GB memory space. It does it backwards, so for a 256 MB video card, it gets the addressees from 4096 - 3840 MBs. This prevents these addressees from being used by the system, so you effectively lose that RAM. There are two traditional methods of fixing this, the first is to use more than 32-bits of address space, and allow the video RAM to be mapped above the 4 GB barrier. This is what the Intel Santa Rosa chipset (used in all older MBPs that support 4 GBs of RAM), The second fix is to use a 64-bit kernel, which puts the address space up to the 264 range (around 17.2 billion GBs of RAM). As previously mentioned, I am not well versed with the Mac architecture, but I wonder if the behavior you are seeing is some combination of the 9400M taking its system memory, and the 9600 GT taking up addressees due to an addressing limitation? Won't really know for sure until Snow Leopard comes out, as it finally makes the OS X kernel 64-it, which should ease any addressing limitations. Good luck!
Rich S.

Total Posts or Current On Line Posts?

Tuttle, Dennis, et al.
I notice that the number of posts under my handle are a "puny" six.
I thought in the "old days" the number of posts in the adjacent column was your total posts. I have ~1,400 posts.
Does the new software reflect current on line posts or is my count in the adjacent column starting over because of the the new Software?
My profile does reflect the proper aggregate number.
Thanks,
Canoe
3 MacBooks, 2 GHz, 2 GB; 2 AEBS, 1 AXBS Mac OS X (10.4.8)

Hi, again, Canoe -
Yes, online posts are displayed in the sidebar to the left under our names where total points were once displayed.
My profile does reflect the proper aggregate number.
It's actually a little bit off. The total number of posts in our Profiles reflects our total posts at the time of the last change of forum software, but due to an accounting issue, the number of posts we had online at the time of the last change was inadvertently added together with our total posts, thus the number of total posts displayed in our Profiles overstates our real totals.
You would have to have some record of how many posts you had online at the time of the changeover to know with any certainty how many posts you'd need to subtract from the total that shows in your Profile to arrive at the true number.
You might also notice that at the time of the change in software, the number of points required for each level as well as our point totals were doubled with points being rounded to the nearest five, as the present software only doles out points in increments of five.

Inserting an image to a message post or attaching images to a post or creating a gallery

Hi:
I'm trying to either attach an image to a message post or insert it in-line with a message. I've read several references to this ability perhaps being something that will happen "soon", but those messages that refer to this are dated in August of 2009. Here it is December and I still can't figure out how.
The online help says very clearly:
How do I insert an image in a post?
You insert an image the same way as you did before, but now you have more choices about where the image comes from and how it looks. You can insert an image from your computer (this uploads the image to your gallery), from your image gallery (if the image has been approved), or from another location on the Web.
To insert an image in a post:
Start a new post.
You can insert images anywhere: in messages, replies, blog articles, ideas, or comments.
Click the Insert Image button in the editor's tool bar (it looks like a tree).
Well, I don't know how you could do it "before", but there is no "Insert Image" button in the editor's toolbar at all.
There are also messages in this forum that say you can paste from a Word document (there IS a "Paste from Word" icon on the toolbar.) However, when I paste from word, the images in my Word document are lost.
Finally, I thought I'd post the images in a gallery. Again the online help says:
To upload an image to your image gallery:
Go to your Profile page and click the View Image Gallery link.
Click Browse to select an image file to be uploaded.
If the image is small enough (the size limit is set by your community), the image is uploaded. A preview of the image appears so that you can make sure you uploaded the right image.
There is no "View Image Gallery" link on my profile page.
Now, I am a computer consultant and therefore (hopefully) very computer-savvy, so this is not an issue with me being a forum "novice." But I've always had issues with help documents that say "click on this icon" and don't show a screenshot of where the icon is.
And, I can't PROVE that my profile page doesn't have a gallery link because I can't upload a screenshot! <grin>.
So, can anyone clarify if and how we can upload images? Or if there is a definitive help document that lays this out, provide a link to that document? The help "search" function is pretty weak, because it does a FORUM search on any term you type in, rather than restricting it to help documents.
There's also some references to having to be a "silver member" in order to upload images, but no information on what is required to become such a member.
Thanks
Ron

As stated in the Community Ranking Structure post on the Announcements section:
Many community members will ask (and have asked in the past) exactly what the criteria is for achieving each rank in the hierarchy. To eliminate the likelihood of system abuse or forum ‘rank climbing’, we have decided not to publicize the exact ranking criteria. That said, community members will gain higher ranking by excelling in the activity components below. The list is not in order of importance and some elements are weighted greater than others.
Kudos Given
Kudos Received
Length of Time on the Community
Number of logins
Posts marked as “Accepted Solution”
Total number of Posts (minus deleted posts)
Total Number of Tags applied throughout community
Time spent online in the Community Forums
As members achieve higher rankings within the Community Forums, they will automatically receive additional functionality – while maintaining the functionality rights previously achieved.
This is done to prevent spamming and trolling of the forums and to prevent objectionable content from being uploaded to the site. There are legal issues involved with this and it preserves the integrity of the forums to grant certain permissions at certain ranks.
The ranking structure undergoes periodic review and this may change in the future -- but no guarantees.
If a forum member gives an answer you like, give them the Kudos they deserve. If a member gives you the answer to your question, mark the answer that solved your issue as the accepted solution.

Report showing difference in actual amount posted in a WBS Element

Dear Guru
I have an unusal scenario, using T Code S_ALR_87013558, in this report the actual amount which is shown infront is different from the amount showing inside i.e if I see the detail transaction wise amount, apart from AA document type.
I have find the difference is due to the reason of transaction that is happing in foreign currency ( Transcation Currency) is display in frront total, but the posting that is made in CO Code currency thats is in my case INR is not taking upfront total amount.
Further this is only happening in case of one WBS element of the whole project.
Reagrds
Vivek

Hi,
check whether u have configed correctly
-Value categories &
- assign cost elements to value categories
reg,
Sam Lesha

Regarding: Purchase ledger posting

Hi All,
When an GRPO is posted then the stock accnt is debited and the allocation cost account is credited. When succesievly the A/p Invoice is ceated the Alocation cost account is debited and the Vendor account credited. Now if the PL statement is generated the allocation cost is 0 balance. My client makes three entries on purchase- Purchase local, Purchase 3%, Purchase 4%. Now as it happens in sales, there is a sales revenue account where a seperate posting is made which can be seen in the ledger.and the total sale value can be seen.
Can this be done in purchase. how??
Three purchase account= Purchase local, Purchase 3%, Purchase 4%.

Tanx for ur reply jimmy
But you got it wrong in a way. The requirement is not three accnt codes for one row. Actually it is for three different purchase docs(A/P Inv). The client purchases in three categories. For eg.Some vendors give 2% disc, Some give 3% disc and other local customer dont give discounts. So the different A/P Inv will be posted in three different accnts One for one to the corresponding type. Not One into three.
The moto is when the ledger balance of the accnts will be seen the at a glance the user will know that what is the value based purchase done till date for these categories seperately.
Just refer to the fact that we have "Sales Revenue domestic" and Sales Revenue Foreign" in the COA. This shows us the value of rev from 2 diff categories.
Similarly is it possible to have different Expense Accounts where the purchase total will be posted and the category specific purchase value can be seen from the balance of that particular Accnt.

How to post Freight Charge in INbound INVOIC Idoc? (MM Invoice Verif)

Hi Folks,
Would like to post an inbound invoice(810) IDoc that has multiple line items that may or may not have variances(quantity, price, etc.). MM Logistics Invoice verification is the process used for posting our invoices for raw materials. We would like for the line item variances to continue to post to the PPV account. Our problem is freight. Freight in this instance is in the header of the IDOC(segment E1EDK05). For example, we create a purchase order with 3 line items for $100.00 each totaling $300.00 for the purchase order. We receive an EDI Invoice for $345.00 which contains a $45.00 charge in the header for freight. We would like for the freight to be posted to the appropriate account. Currently the $45.00 difference in P/O total and Invoice total is being posted to the PPV account. Your helpis appreciated!
What if Freight charge is populated as Line item in the inbound invoic idoc. Will the inbound program allow this kind of posting??
Throw some light experts.
Thanks,
Matt
Edited by: Creasy Matthew on Aug 16, 2009 6:25 PM
Edited by: Creasy Matthew on Aug 16, 2009 6:25 PM

Yes, you can include the freight cost in line item as well but that would not be advisable. Why don't you include Fright Cost in your pricing procedure ??? Do check the following link
How to account freight in purchase order

BAI2 Lockbox Issue-Credit memo posting

When a credit memo (Document found) is processed through the
lockbox, the payment amount/residual amount is calculating incorrectly.
The check is posting on account. The issue is visible during post-
processing (FLB1)
For example, if the credit memo is -$4428, the residual amount is
showing as 4,428.00. This should be zero since the record is contained
in the BAI2 file as shown below:
401800560101962934 00000000000000442800
Another way of looking at this issue is that the payment amount is
showing as -$8,856 rather than as -$4428.
We are not using reason codes.

We are on version SAP ECC 6.0. The credit information is in the right 10 characters of the amount field (DDAMT) in the FLB24 structure.
PYAMT     PYAMT_FLB2     NUMC     10     0     Payment Amount
DDAMT     DDAMT_FLB2     NUMC     10     0     Deduction amount
The check contains 4 documents all of which are found and the amounts are matching. The first "4" record is the credit memo. The other 3 invoices are regular payments. The check total processes and posts on account at the correct value.
401800560102934            00000000000000440000
401800560204209            00070000000000000000
401800560304212            00030000000000000000
401800560494211            00045000000000000000
The check amount is for 140,600.00
When post-processing, the invoices are listed and the payment amount shows as follows
invoice# Inv amt      payment amt
2934       -4400         -8800
4209      70000         70000
4212      30000         30000
4211     45000          45000
My OSS note search has been unsuccessful thus far.

Display of total ansal for each org unit using the sdepth (depth level)

Hi all,
     We have a requirment in which we will be getting all the active employees related to a perticular org unit then For every PERNR,we need to find (as of run date) the org ID on PA0001- ORGEH and total the dollars at the org unit ID level started at the org unit defined on field ORGID and only as far down as defined on selection screen field SDEPTH.
       Example: $10k under Dept D, $9k under Dept C, $8k under Dept B and $7k under Dept A. If field SDEPTH was set to blank, each department would be assigned the above stated budget amount. If SDEPTH was set to 3, the budget would stop at the third level down the org chain (assuming A is the org unit defined in field ORGID, org unit C would be the third org down the chain). The total budget at level C would incorporate any dollars calculated from employees that fall below this org unit in the structure. In this example, the total for org unit C would be $19k, B would remain at 8k and A at 7k.
    We are making use of the FM : RH_STRUC_GET to get all pernr numbers related to a perticular org unit and sub level units separately and also RP_ANSAL_FROM_WAGETYPES for getting ansal based on the wahge types (multiple wage types can be provided by the user on the selection screen) .
Please let me know how can i achive the requirement.
Regards,
Zareena.
Edited by: zareena molla on May 20, 2008 7:14 AM

Thanks Dan.
Appreciate if you can help on the below points as well.
1. As part of divestiture/transfer postings: The system is reversing some Previous Year(PY) equity accounts into themselves. How can we get the system to eliminate them by posting to COI Clearing account. Basically, we dont want the PY accounts to be touched?
For the Retained earnings - PY account, the system is actually posting to COI clearing account.
These PY accounts are part of some scopes for equitization.
Is there any link between the "balance carry forward" - list of items table and the divestiture postings?
Does the system check this table while posting/reversing the equity(PY) accounts?
2. I want to understand the sequence in which the system posts the documents at the old parent and new parent (group) level.
The same activity number is there for Total Divestiture, total transfer documents posted at new parent level and total divestiture document posted at old parent level.
Does the system follow bottom up approach? Thereby creating total divestiture document at old parent level.
Followed by documents at upper level (new parent level)
Also , at the upper level(new parent level), does it post documents in the way they are shown in the log? (We havent changed the default sequence maintained in UCWB - COI settings). so it will post first consolidation doc, followed by total divestiture, followed by total transfer docs at the new parent level?
Is this the reason for the double value being posted at new parent for equity holding data?
Will studying the statistical items (corresponding to eliminated equity holding items) be relevant here to understand why at upper level there is double the value being posted by system?
Thanks.

Error when posting to CO via RPCATSCO (transaction CAT7)

Hi to all,
when using transaction CAT7 (program RPCATSCO) in order to poste data to SAP CO, I receive some error message for some records : here is the error message :
+Debit/credit indicator is inconsistent
Message no. F5846
Procedure
An error has occurred in the active application. Either the debit/credit indicator must be consistent with the posting key when transferred, or the called application will refuse the transfer of the debit/credit indicator and use the FI-Service to derive it.+
I alse see that there is a difference between total hours transferred (CATSCO) and total hours correctly posted (transaction KOB1).
My question is :
Where can I find the not correctly posted data? Is there a table where I can find all related data to the eroor message?
Or any detailed report I can use after my posting program RPCATSCO?
remark :
As the amount of data transferred is very big, I can't scroll nor check the standard log for wrong documents
Thanks in advance.

you can try to run the report RPCATSCO in debug mode by putting /h in the transaction code box on top left and then create a watch point for the message F5846
see if that helps.
Sanjiv
Edited by: Sanjiv Agarwal on Feb 25, 2010 7:58 PM

Where to see all the posts presented by me?

Dear All
where i can see the total number of posts(just number) presented by me in SD forum?
Out of my posts some might be correct answers--some might be helpful--where i can see all these(any one place to give me clarity)
Suppose if i participated in 500 posts by my comments after my joining in forum-----
10 may be right,
10 may be helpful,
480 posts might be of no-use...
where i can see this??(any one place to see all)
Please help...
Phanikumar

If you want to know about threads posted by you, then select 'Authored'>Discussions and there from the drop down option you can find out which all threads have been answered (green tick) and unanswered as well (blue question mark sign)
If you intended to know about your participation to other's thread, then you can filter it with 'Participated' option as mentioned in below screenshot.
I didnt find any option that tells total number of posts other than counting manually.
Jason Lax can answer better.
Regards,
JK

Total No. of Post Decrease.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for