Total value change

Hello all:
I find something wrong with my GR,so i use movement type 102 to do reverse but the total value different from GR
What can cause this error,someone can gave some advice?
Edited by: king xin on Dec 21, 2010 6:11 AM

Hi,
Check following points,
1) Whether any inventory transctions w.r.t PO took place after 101 Movement type in system?
2) Whether material is revaluated on that day after your Goods receipt?
Regards,
Vijaykumar P

Similar Messages

Contract Total value change after PO creation & GR

Hi,
I would like to understand whether the below mentioned behaviour is a standard one of SAP.
Value contract (WK) is created for 10,000 INR. And PO created for 5,000 INR and GR&IR also done
for 5000 INR.
Now I am able to reduce the target value of contract below 5000 INR in ME32K.
I feel system should not allow to do the same.
Please throw your opinion.
Regards,
Partha

Hi Jurgen,
Thanks for your input.
As we go with your example with the assumption that procurement
has happened fully for 1 million kg and vendor was also paid
for 1 million kg, Then I feel system should atleast warn the user
when he is trying to reduce the quantity in contract header.
I would be happy to receive your comments on the above.
Regards,
Partha

Runnin Total value mismatched in Sectioning

Hi Experts,
Am using 2 Dimensions(Say A&B) & Running total of one particular measure(C).
When 2 Dimesions(A&B) are in the Table level, Running total of particualr Measure(C) is showing Exact value.
But, if one of the dimension is on the Sectioning.. Running Total value changed....
Anyone, Pls, help in this problem....
Thanks in advance,
Chithra

Hi Chithra,
How you are expecting runningsum exactly?
if you want each section starts with new(starts from first row measure in section) runningsum, hope below formula will help you
=RunningSum([Measure];Section) OR =RunningSum([Measure];([Sectioned field]))
If you want continuous RunningSum just use below formula.
=RunningSum([Measure])
Hope above formulas will help you...............

Condition value from previous PO changes total value of new PO

Dear gentlemen,
We have a surcharge condition, calculation type = B (Fixed amount), category = Delivery costs. When viewing header condition details in PO, there appears an unknown "condition base value" with no "rate unit" associated with it. This value is carried over to the next PO created, changing its total value, thus affecting inventory value. What is wrong with this condition? How can I not let the system carry over "condition value" from previous POs?
Regards,
Carlos Piana
La Universal
Guayaquil, Ecuador, South America

My aim is the difference between 56062 on 10.07.2012 00:00:00 and 52013 on 13.04.2012 and so on.
The final table should look like this:
DateId
Severity
PageCount
DeviceId
ErrorId DIFF
13.04.2012 00:00:00
1
52013
163
1              52013
10.07.2012 00:00:00
1
56062
163
1               4049
13.11.2012 00:00:00
4
63907
163
1                 ...
28.11.2012 00:00:00
4
64492
163
1
12.09.2012 00:00:00
4
61524
163
1
29.11.2012 00:00:00
4
64573
163
1
Why I am doing this is that I want to calculate an Printerindex. This is the Amount of Errors related to the volume of pages, printed.
The Formula in DAX is Measure:=(COUNT(FactErrors[ErrorId]))/(SUM(FactErrors[PagesCount])/10000)
So I get this PivotTable:
Zeilenbeschriftungen
CountDevices
SUM PageCount
CountErrors
PrinterIndex
MFP
523
90135296
1362
31,24906792
HP
125
30805190
241
5,529387202
Lexmark
369
53500358
856
27,39392853
Samsung
29
5829748
265
41,33069233
Samsung CLX-92x1 93x1 Series
22
5400624
246
38,36735967
Samsung SCX-8123 8128 Series
7
429124
19
4,482612183
You see, that if I can't SUM already summarized printed volume. Another way could be to aggregate the volume as MAX() but this is not working, either.
Zeilenbeschriftungen
CountDevices
MAX PageCount
CountErrors
PrinterIndex
MFP
523
435853
1362
0,151106177
HP
125
435853
241
0,07823357
Lexmark
369
312478
856
0,159998929
Samsung
29
64117
265
0,454565103
Samsung CLX-92x1 93x1 Series
22
64117
246
0,45550292
Samsung SCX-8123 8128 Series
7
42386
19
0,442762465
I hope you see my problem ...

Changing totals value in hierarchical alv for a particular level/row

Hi,
I am displaying a hierarchical ALV having 4 levels.
Using field catalog, totals for all dynamic columns are found out.
I have a requirement not to display totals value for first and second levels.
And if possible, to display another value.
Tried using CL_GUI_ALV_TREE->change_node.
But it not updating.
Please suggest a solution.
Thanks,
Nisha Vengal.

Hi Ten Mariga,
I wonder why the second select Query is needed at all instead you can use
---> Not Needed
FORM DATA_RETRIEVAL1.
SELECT * FROM zcontact INTO TABLE it_zcontact WHERE id EQ wa_zcontact-id.
ENDFORM.
----> Instead you can do
READ TABLE it_zcontact INTO wa_zcontact INDEX p_seltab-tabindex.
Append wa_zcontact to Second_table.
And you can use the Second_table to display the second ALV. The second Select Query will affect the performance too.
Cheers,
Krishnakumar B.

How can I get the total "values" in a hashtable ?

i know that i can get the total values in a hashtable by hash.elements() method. It returns an
enumeration with all the values present in this hashtable. this is fine upto here.
Now the preoblem is:
According to what rule this enumeration will be returned. I mean..
If i added in key A with value a,
then key B with value b;
then key C with value c;
then key D with value d;
(They all are objects of type String)
now i call ... hash.elements(); Suppose it returns Enumeration enum;.
Now in what order they all are present in this hashtable.
Meaning is that if i move arond this enum in what sequence they all will be returned.
option A ) In the same order as they were inserted in hashtable.
option B ) According to LIFO;
option C) There is no fix rules , simply it return all the elements and u cannot judge that the first element in enum was really the first element inserted in the hashtable and the second element of enum was really the second element inserted in the hashtable.
What do u think..which option is correct ?
Ny idea will highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Sanjeev Dhiman

hi, i am again..
boss ! this is not true..u just change the order and or change the keys and something like ...
"Sanjeev", "hello"
"Dhiman", "hi"
"Technosys" ,"Services"
u will find that its not LIFO..really i was thinking before coding my project that option A is correct and with knowledge i wrote 3 - 4 classes but when i run the programm its starts throwing errors.
so, i posted this question. I think "apppu" is right.
I think , firstly hash is calculated for each value and that value is returned which can be received in a fastest way and hence not necessarily in LIFO and FIFO..
Thanks to u also as u gave ur precious time for me.
Once again.
Thank you very much.
Sanjeev Dhiman

Free sample sales - Control for Total Value

Dear all,
In our sales free process we configured
a condition type Z100 Net value
and condition record maintained with Key
Customer / Material / Plant
Higher authority is maintaining teh condition reocrd for one day.
10000/ Fg123456 / h210 - 100 % 12.8.2011 12.8.2011
and It will come in the sales order and the Total value will get knocked off by Z100 condition type.
But in this user can enter any number of quantity in the day and product can be dispatch as free sample.
Now we want here
The Basic value (multiply by qty) of the sales order should not go beyond Rs 5000/-
It should be restricted.
Or can we have some release strategy so that Rs 5000 marketing manager can release,
5000 - 10000 COO and above CEO.
Please suggest me, even the full process need to changed also OK for us.
Thanks and Regards,
Mani

Hi Mani,
As explained already, through user exit MV45AFZZ, you can acheive the block.
for your 2nd part, you can get a z-report develop to check the orders that are blocked with this specific delivery block and their net value and item details. Allow the business user to choose the documents he wants to release, since this is purely a business decision. For the orders he wants to release, again through the same user exit MV45AFZZ and FORM USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE, you can get this block removed through ABAP programming.
You can define a new blocking reason, if required in OVLS.
Regards,
Raghu.

Condition value of Tax condition type gets added to Total Value in Contract

Hi All,
I'm currently investigating an issue where there are 2 line items in an SAP Sales Contract. There is a human error in the second line where the billing end date is less than billing start date in the billing plan. Consequently, the second line has null Outgoing target value.
However, the header Total value in the Contract gets wrongly calculated as Basic condition value of 1st line + Condition value of tax condition type of line one due to this.   When I modify the billing end date for the second line item to be a date greater than the billing start date, the above problem disappears and the total value of the contract does not include the tax component.
For eg.
Normal Error free Contract
Total Value at Header =   700.00 EUR
                   Material          Outgoing Target val
Item 0010    MAT1               450.00                          ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020    MAT2               150.00
Contract with billing plan error in second line
Total value at Header =   550.00 EUR
                        MAterial       Outgoing target val
Item 0010         MAT1             450.00                    ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
Item 0020         MAT2              0.00
Any inputs would be most welcome.
Regards,
Venkatesh.
Edited by: Venkatesh Gopalarathnam on Jan 24, 2012 9:48 AM

No, i didn't.
Actually, i enter condition type and amount in sales order manually.
At that time my program which i modified at 'Define And Assign Pricing Procedures' in IMG should be run.
But the result of running is different from my purpose.
To change Condition value of condition type in sales order, are there any solution?

FM returns wrong total value for Limit type PO's

Hi all,
I am working on SRM 5.0 (SP13) ECS.
I have implemented the BADI "BBP_WFL_APPROVAL_BADI" for determining the Approvers for PO whenevr a PO is changed.If the diference between the Old PO value and new PO value is > 1000 and the approval text field(custom text under "Documents" link) is set to "YES",then the WF approval is required and the approvers are determined.
The above logic works fine for the Standard type PO's where the difference between the old value and new value is determined using FM "BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL" by passing the GUID (for the change version and the active vesion) obtained at runtime in the BADI.
However for the limit type PO's,whenevr I change the total value for the Limit item,I see that the FM "BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL" doesnt return the changed value but always returns blank!
Bcause I need to check bth the values i.e. Custom text set to "YES" as well as Total value diff ,I cant use the start conditions in tcode SWB_COND.ALso I need to fetch the approvers based on the price diff so I need this value at runtime in the BADI using the FM "BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL".
Please advise why the FM is not returning the changed values for the Limit type PO and is there any other way(other table/FM) to get the changed value at runtime for the LIMIT type PO.
Thanks for your time.
Edited by: Rads1234 on Nov 18, 2010 4:39 AM

Thanks for the rpely.
Yes.I am using the GUID available at runtime in the BADI "BBP_WFL_APPROV_BADI" which is the current change version GUID.I tried using that GUID to get the data from both FM as well as CDHDR and CDPOS tables.
I think this is something related to LImit type PO because for Standard type PO's the FM returns the corretc changed value (as in the screen) for the change version GUID.I fail to understand why the changed values are shwon on the screen but are not stored anywhere in the system before actually ordering the PO!

SEM BPS - Planning function to distribute total value over months

Hello,
We use SEM BPS. In fact we use the integration of SEM BPS in the CRM opportunity component as opportunity planning.
Now we want to distribute the total value of certain key figures over the months. Either equal distribution or increasing distribution like 1% increase every month. What would be the best way to do that with a planning function?
We need to take into account that the number of months depends on the start and end date of the transaction (opportunity).
Best regards,
Thomas

Hi Thomas,
I would probably create a fox formula, do a foreach in selection loop over the months and distribute the values within that formula.
If you want to use a standard distribution function, you need to create the reference data somewhere before, which could be a bit difficult if the timeframe changes according to user selections.
regards
Cornelia

Purchasing report - To capture PO value changes

Experts,
I am in process of creating Purchase order report.
User wants to report on total PO value at start of date - end of date.
I have currently captured changes at line-item level by reading data from CDPOS and CDHDR through functional module.
At the moment we are reporting only line items that have changed, however in order to see the total value of a PO... we would need either of the following:
- all line items on a PO if any line items have changed OR
- two additional fields - one for total PO value at the start of the period and one for total PO value at the end.
Where a line item has multiple changes within the period, we really only want to see what the value was at the start of the reporting period and at the end of the reporting period.
How to go forward in this scenario?
Any suggestion greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Ishak
Edited by: Ishak007 on Nov 30, 2009 4:04 PM

Do you want users to select a period or a range of periods and then see the beginning and end value of a certain PO? You can try creating two date variables based on the entered period selection. Set the first one for all datas smaller or eual to the first date of the low value period selection and the second one for all dates smaller or equal to the last date of the high value of the period selection. Use these in two different columns and you're done. Might not give the best performance however.
A second option might be the snapshot scenario suggested by SAP for stock values, basicly load from your changes ODS to a new ODS or cube with a period selection.
Kind regards,
Alex

T.Code for checking the total value of a material

Hi Experts,
Can anybody tel me the T.code for checking the total value of a material which is procured in a specified period?
Thanks in advance
Channa

Refer Tcode ME80FN click on Change Veiw & select Purchase Order History with this you can get PO-GRN-INVOICE Qty & Value details
Last button on Application tool Bar it is in line of filter, total etc icons
Also check below reports :
MC$G - PURCHIS: Material PurchVal Selection
MC$0 - PURCHIS: PurchGrp PurchVal Selection
MC$< - PURCHIS: MatGrp PurchVal Selection
MC$4 - PURCHIS: Vendor PurchVal Selection

If change in PO value, need other rel stategy made for value change only

I have customized PO Relase strategy based on value. working correctly.
In that, if there is a change in PO value after the PO release, then Release strategy is being redetermined according to new value. But user wants that if there is a change in PO value, it should follow different rel startegy for which change value is >0 USD(not regular release startegy defined for each value range).
For this to happen, for value change, what kind of characteristic(table field) I can use as criteria so that new release startegy can be determined for any change value after final relaese?
Is ther any possible way to make this happen? Pl. suggest me different ways.
Vijay

Dear Vijay,
In order for another release strategy to getting determined, the PO should have another set of value
to meet the characteristic for the new release strategy or else it will use back the same release strategy
with approval reset and management need to reapprove again the same release strategy.
Based on your description, there is no need for another release strategy to get determined if the PO
still contain the same set value that meet the previous release strategy . Let say you increase the
total value of the PO, incase the release strategy still meet the current approve release, it should reset
it again but not another release strategy that not meet with value in the PO.
If you create another new release strategy that the criteria overlay the characteristic of this old release strategy,
for new PO, no release strategy will be getting determine.
Best Regards,
Ian

Purchase Requistion List by total value

Hi All
Is there a report that shows total value of all items in a Purchase requisiton by number
Vishnu

Hi
U can check total price of PR in That PR also
Follow the steps
1)In Item Overview click select layout -->change Layout
2)Select valuation price from hidden column to display column and tick check box next to it
3)Save above
4)Now Valuation price field is available in item overview
5)U can click sigma button to find total item value
Vishal...

PO Release for Total Value

Hello,
I want to set PO release strategy for TOTAL VALUE of PO, including tax amount.
I have seen some threads here, and tried it in SAP but its not taking tax value.
Any idea why its not taking tax value, any tips and tricks.
Thanks,
Anil

Hi Anil,
I too got the same requirement, can u please help me?
i am using user exit for changing the GNETW value from exporting the total value from an enchancement point and importing it in the user exit.
but when the PO price is reduced control is not going to enchancement point so total value it is not getting in my user exit so it is taking net order value. in this case it is failing
can u give me the better solution for this?
Regards,
D.Raghu Ram.

Total value change

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for