Track P.O.no.against Asset created via AUC settlement

Hi Friends,
We have a scenario wherein an AUC is populated in a P.O.as account assignment object. Goods Receipt entries are made for these P.O.s and the AUC gets values therefrom. This AUC is then settled to a Final Asset.
We would like to know whether there is any way to track the P.O.no.against the Final Asset. This maybe through a report, or through some table entries.
There's a t code AIAZ, but it tracks only the asset mentioned in the P.O., which in our case is the AUC. Table EKKN also tracks the account assignments for Purchase Orders.
Let's say the AUC has 40 line items, whereas there are 5 Final Assets as settlement receivers.When the settlement entries are made from AUC to Final Asset, 5 entries will be generated in the foreground, but can we see the entries generated internally by the system, as in to see how the system has allocated values?
Regards,
Varun

Hi Preeti,
The t code FIAAIN_PO_TRACK mentioned above does not exist in our system. Does it need to be developed?
Regards,
Varun

Similar Messages

Error in Settlement of Asset created to AuC

Hi All,
While settling an asset which was created under AuC I have encountered the following problem:
While running the T-code AIBU the system has given me the following error:
Company code not defined in Asset Accounting
Message no. AA821
Diagnosis
Company code is not defined for Assets Accounting.
Procedure
Define company code via the Customizing menu.
I have maintained all the respective settings. Kindly help me in resolving the error.
Thanks and Regards,
Kanupriya

Hi
check note 459719, if it solves the problem.
This can occur in the following cases:
1. In Transaction AIAB the settlement rule which should be used to settle a line item received a time limit, that is 'To period' and 'To fiscal' year were entered. If thus the settlement rule is not valid for the current settlement period (posting period) the line item is not settled.
2. You assigned an amount rule to a line item in Transaction AIAB, however, the value 0 was posted in this line item in valuation area 01 (for example, because of the posting with a flow type restricted to valuation areas). In this case, this line item is not settled because an amount rule only refers to valuation area 01.
Solution
Use a valid settlement rule so that the affected line item is settled.
In case 1, remove the to period and to fiscal year from the settlement rule in transaction AIAB. The settlement of a line item should only be controlled by whether a settlement rule is assigned to this line item.
In case 2, use a settlement rule with percent or equivalence number because no amount is settled in valuation area 01.
Regards

Asset created via AS91 not visible in Asset history sheet

HI,
I have transferred an asset from legacy system . Created teh same via AS91. But the same is not visible in Asset History Sheet
S_ALR_87012048 . Please let me know why.
Regards
SR

Hi SR,
S_ALR_87012048 is an Asset transaction report which is updated only when transaction like (acquisition, retirement, etc) is performed. Values of this report are fetched from ANEP table.
For Asset history sheet, you can check S_ALR_87011964.
Thanks,
Mayank

How do i track account posted against PO created for cost centre

Hi All,
I have created PO with cost Center 'K' without material and i have entered G/L account no as well then i have done GR against PO.
How do i track account posted against PO created for cost center
BR
Govind

hi,
Check the table COSP - Cost centre external postings
also check ..COEP and COBK...
This will help you to see...
IN COSP - See the debit / credit in BEKNZ and ledger - in the field LEDNR...Valuation type - WRTTP...
Hope it helps...
Regards
Priyanka.P

Regarding Down Payment against Asset purchase

Hi SAP GURU
i have one queries regarding down payment made against asset puchase order
I created one asset code, create the PO with accoun assignment categories A, made a advance payment against reference to this PO no .
Now the problem is , asset capitalised date is automaticaly come same as down payment date and it is reflecting in asset explorer , T code - AW01N.
Can any body suggest what is the right way for the whole scenarion , or i am making some mistake .
Is there any config setting i am missing.
Please help me out , issue is very critical.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Anjan

Hi Anjan,
From your below query, I infer that you have created asset PO and made down payment against PO without goods and invoice receipt. Am I right?
Are you following Valuated goods receipt or non valuated goods receipt concept?
Valuated goods receipt: Asset will be debited at the time of goods receipt
Non valuated good receipt: Asset will be debited at the time of invoice receipt
If you follow valuated goods receipt concept, then at the time of making down payment, asset should not be debited (whatever the value date/ capitalization date be). Please refer SAP note number 310368 (valuated goods receipt paragraph) for reference. In that they have clearly mentioned the steps to make down payment against asset PO without debiting to asset and without any error message. You have to make F5 378 message number from error message to warning message and in posting key 29 and 39, you have to supress the asset related fields. If you have done the above settings, then system will not show any error message to update G/L account in AO90 transaction code for the Acquisition: down payments and Down payment clearing - 2nd and 4th field.
Here we are following the valudated goods receipt and initially I faced the same issue and we sorted out after following the steps mentioned in the above sap note number.
Hope this helps. Assign points if useful.
Regards
Dwarak.

Vendor Return against Asset

All SAP Gurus,
We have procured material against asset (material do not have any material code as it has been procured against asset).
Now we want to return it back to the vendor.
We have created the return document through MBRL.
But while creating Excise invoice in J1IS system is giving an error message as 'Required parameters missing when calling up module MARC_SINGLE_READ
Message no. M3749'

Hi,
In which Version u r Working ??
Pl. have a look at this OSS Note :: 648566
Biswajit

Bizzare effects when letters are created via a CASE...

CRM 5.0
Our production CRM system is periodically copied into our regression system.
Sometime in late October it was noted that all apostrophe (') characters we being replaced by hash (#) characters when any letter was produced as part of a Case run. Letters produced by a Case are displayed as PDF documents in the WebIC, where as regular letters are displayed as Word docs. Anyway, taking a particular service ticket containing a letter created via the Case run I can attempt to view it in the Regression system, but it simply will not display. However, the same letter against the same service ticket does display in the Production system, although the Hash characters are being displayed instead of apostrophe characters.
If I a create a new letter in the Regression via a Case run it produces a letter which displays apostrophe's perfectly. But any new letters created in the same way within the Production system still show hashes in the letters.
To me it sounds like an OSS note has been applied to Production but not to Regression, however, if that were true QAS and Development would have the same problem as the OSS Notes would have to first be tested in them, but both QA and DEV displapostrophe's fine the Case letters.
I should add that any e-mails created as part of the same CASE run are sent out perfectly in both our production and regression environment so the problem only seems to affect letters. I was wondering if maybe the default printer settings might affect this in some way as I'm sure that when HTML is output by Smartforms it problems uses an alternative printer, maybe.
Has anyone encountered anything like this before?.
Gary King
Edited by: Gary King on Nov 30, 2009 1:15 PM

It would seem that the two senior agents do not have the right authority and this is somehow affecting the Case letters. We know this as other agents have produced Case letters and the apostrophe's have been displayed in the letters.

Automatic print out of a document that is created via B1iSN

Can anybody tell me if it is possible to print out of a document (purchase invoice) automatically after it has been created via B1iSN?
Does anyone have an example or a link how to realize this?
Thanks
Gerhard.

Hi Gordon,
thanks for your fast reply.
we have a subsidiary A that does all the accounting and sales for subsidiary B (that works as a commercial unit). All goods that are sold in B are purchased in A. We have connected the two subsidiaries via B1i. A sales order in B automatically generates a purchase order that is send to A via B1i (B1PO2B1SO scenario). The invoice from A for these goods is send to B as a purchase invoice via B1i.
This purchase invoice ought to be printed out automatically as the staff and printers are in the same office.
Regards,
Gerhard.

How to get installer created via LV project to install executables on a Vista machine which are in admin mode?

I have an installer for a program created via a LV project which installs two executables.
On Vista, only one of the executables is in admin mode. So, I always have to right click
on the other and select 'run as administrator'.
Any way of getting both of them set to run as administrator by default?

Do your executables include a manifest inside them or are you installing a manifest file next to your executables?
What happens if you just manually copy the executables to your system rather than installing them? Same thing, or different behavior?
-Bob

Problem with ALV Grid (created via FM)

Dear forumers,
When double-clicking on any data row of an ALV grid, the following runtime error occurs:
Runtime error: PERFORM_NOT_FOUND
Exception: CX_SY_DYN_CALL_ILLEGAL_FORM
Short Text
=======
Call (PERFORM) to a non-existent routine.
What happened?
==========
There exist various options:
Error in the ABAP Application Program
The current ABAP program "SAPLSLVC_FULLSCREEN" had to be terminated
because it has come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
or
Error in the SAP kernel.
The current ABAP "SAPLSLVC_FULLSCREEN" program had to be terminated because the
ABAP processor detected an internal system error.
How can I resolve this error for an ALV grid? The ALV grid is created via the FM, 'REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY' and the field catalog is built via the FM, 'REUSE_ALV_FIELDCATALOG_MERGE'.
Please help. Thanks so much.
I also noticed in the Data Browser, SE16 - that if the table contents are displayed in an ALV Grid, double-clicking on any data row will not generate the same error. It also has an additional column on the leftmost to aid the data row selection. Any other ideas on this?
Edited by: Deborah Tan on Jun 23, 2010 8:16 AM

Hi Deborah,
While calling 'REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY', You should have also passed the parameter I_CALLBACK_USER_COMMAND with any form name, or You have passed table IT_EVENTS with form name 'USER_COMMAND' with a form mentioned in it.
If You do not require any user interaction on your ALV, comment the line where I_CALLBACK_USER_COMMAND is passed, or delete the line for 'USER_COMMAND' from the table that is passed in IT_EVENTS.
Else, if You require user interaction, You need to code a form for user command in your program as FORM_USER_COMMAND USING OK_CODE SELFIELD.
Remember the name of the form (for e.g. 'FORM_USER_COMMAND') should be the same that you pass in CALLBACKUSER_COMMAND or the one in 'USER_COMMAND' in table for IT_EVENTS.
Regards,
Birendra

Delivery date getting calculated wrongly in delivery created via VL10D

Hi Gurus,
We have a strange issue, where in delivery date is getting calculated wrongly for replenishment delivery created via VL10D.
When we are creating via VL10D , delivery date is getting the additional 30 days from MaxDlvCrteDate . With initial investigation i see that VL10D has delivery creation profile 0101 for which no of days maintained in max delv creation date is 30 .
I assume that the delivery date is getting the additional days from delivery creation profile felid no of max delv creation date .
I have created the delivery on 24.03.2011, as per the route no of TL time is 9 days , So Ideally the delivery date should be 04.04.2011 , however system has calculated it as 23.04.2011
Delivery no No of days in MaxDlvCrteDate Delivery date
213443158 30 23.04.2011
If I create the delivery for the same PO using t-code VL10B, then delivery date is calculating correctly.
Not sure why system behavior is strange.
Please help me with your inputs to resolve the issue..
Thanks in advance

Please request one Abaper to solve this problem.
You cannot due nothing as the problem is in Code.
Regards
William

Vendor information against Asset Number

Hi Gurus,
I have a FICO report, in it I want to find a table from where i can get the Vendor Name and address against Asset Number...
How Can i link between Vendor Name with Asset Number..
Thanks....

hi
you can check out the following tables
ANLH
ANEP
ANEV
ANKT
ANLA
ANLC
hope it helps
regards
Aakash Banga

Asset Under Construction(AUC),During month end settlement run(via KO8G)

Hi Guys ,
please hlep on this AUC :
During month end settlement run (via tcode KO8G), if there are -ve (credit) values to be settled to an Asset Under Construction (AUC) asset which does not have sufficient +ve value in the current FY, the settlement run will prompt an error message "Balance for transaction type group 10 negative for the area 01". The TT posted via the settlement run is TT115. To get around, user has to raise a manual journal (via doc type AT) to post the -ve value to the same AUC asset via TT101. TT 115 and 101 are configured differently (see attached).
Since the Fixed Assets system does accept credit posting to AUC via a journal, is there a solution to make posting go through via the settlement run?
Regards,
Narra

You can settle the AUC value in one period and posting can be made in another period. in the same you can give the different asset value date in KO88 screen. The only limitation is this possible only if the fiscal year is same.
Give the asset value date as 15.07.2007 in KO88
Hope this will work
Radha

Down payment against Asset

Dear Friends,
we are using SAP ECC 6,
Currently, there is no config, for Advance against Asset,
we maintain below configuration --- (Development Server)
             Financial Accounting (New)
                             Asset Accounting
                                       Transactions
                                                   Acquisitions
                                                              1) Assign Accounts - Maintain GLs
                                                              & 2) Allow Down Payment Transaction Types in Asset Classes-                                                                     maintain all asset class
even though there is error in Purchase order for down payment against Assets.
Please guide me.
any more config ?
thanks
Jitendra K. Surana

sorry !
i am on leave, unable to reply you,
thanks for response, error is as below
Account 140400 in company code 1400 cannot be directly posted to
Message no. F5354
DiagnosisAccount "140400" in company code "1400" is marked as a reconciliation account for account type "K" and cannot therefore be directly posted to.
System Response
Error
Procedure
Select a different account
thanks
regards
jitendra K. surana.

Which table contains net book value for Assets created with AS91.

Which table contains net book value for Assets created with AS91.
I have a problem locating where the net book value is stored in SAP. Is it simply calculated and not stored in any one place? I am trying to predict how SAP will calculate the net book value for some assets we plan on converting, but my formula doesn't always work consistently and I have not idea what is going on. If it is stored in a table some place, can anyone please let me know!
Thank you all

Hi anar.samadzade & Michael Stewart
It is not possible to directly get net book value of an any Table. You must migrate the gross book value (acquisition cost) and the accumulated depreciation. SAP will then calculate the NBV.
Gross Block & Accumulate Dep you will get from Table: ANLC
http://fixedassetsaccounting.net/migrating-fixed-assets-into-sap-a-harlex-guide/
Dear anar.samadzade Ask Questions politely
Regards
Viswa

Track P.O.no.against Asset created via AUC settlement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for