Transaction of item with cost-group 2614 results incost-group comingle

Hi,
I'm working on EBS 11i.
I have setup inv organization and wms is enabled.
When i'm trying to make transactions betwwen suborganizations there is an
error message for some type pf items:
Transaction of item with cost-group 2614 results in cost group comingle.
I see that for some item, in On hand quanitity form are grouped in different cost groups.
There is a way to change the cost group of those items, or to make this cost group disabled.
In this organization I do not care about cost and account. (It is just needed to have physical count of items)
Pls advice how to solve?
Thank you in advance,
Denis

HI,
is not that type of error.
Actually there is no error. the system is working as it should.
I have used different cost groups in subinventories.
I need a way to change the cost group for some of the items.
I found some workaround in article 837816.1 but i'm not able to follow it.
Pls,
help with procedure to follow.
Thank you in advance,
Denis

Similar Messages

Transaction of item with cost-group 2008 results in cost-group comingle

Hi Folks,
I have the following error on Miscellaneous Transaction when I use a different cost group than the default one assign on subinventory:
Transaction of item with cost-group 2008 results in cost-group comingle
In our specific case, we define a CONVERSION subinventory with default Cost Group is X
We would like to create Miscellaneous Transactions (interface table) which use CONVERSION subinventory with different Cost Group.
The problem is when we use a Cost Group other than X, the "comingle" error occured.
Is there a manner to create a Miscellaneous Transactions base on a Cost Group different than the default define in the subinventory?
Regards

HI,
is not that type of error.
Actually there is no error. the system is working as it should.
I have used different cost groups in subinventories.
I need a way to change the cost group for some of the items.
I found some workaround in article 837816.1 but i'm not able to follow it.
Pls,
help with procedure to follow.
Thank you in advance,
Denis

Help with query to return results from group within table?

Hi
Im a total noob, so please be gentle....!
I am looking at a table that has a WORD column and a WORD_TYPE_ID column.
Words can have the same type_id.
What I am trying to do is write a query that will return the longest word for each word_type_id.
I have been trying for hours to get this and all I seem to get is either error messages or I return the longest word in the whole WORD column.
The furthest I can get before things break down is.....
select word
from table
where
length(word) =
select
max(length(word))
from table
Any help on this or if I could be pointed in the right direction it would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks

Hi,
Welcome to the forum!
Here's one way:
SELECT    word_type_id
,       MIN (word) KEEP (DENSE_RANK LAST ORDDER BY LENGTH (word))     AS longest_word
FROM       table_x
GROUP BY word_type_id;If there happens to be a tie within some word_type_id (that is, 2 or more words have exactly the same length, which is the longest in that group) the expression above will return the first one, in alphabetic order. (That's what MIN means here.)
Edited by: Frank Kulash on Aug 11, 2009 1:56 PM
You almost had it.
As you noticed, you were getting the longest row in the whole table. That's because your sub-query was looking at the whole table.
If you correlate the sub-query to the row in the main table, as shown below, you can get the longest word in each group:
select word
from     table     m                              -- m for main
where      length (word) = (
                            select max (length(word))
               from     table
               where     word_type_id = m.word_type_id     -- New
               );

Error message: No pymt possible because items with a debit

Folks,
My vendor line items are
Rs 1000- credit memo dated 05/25/2006 pay terms net 30
Rs 50- credit memo dated 06/10/2006 pay terms net 30
Rs 300- credit memo dated 08/10/2006 pay terms net 30
Rs 5000 invocie dated 09/01/2006 pay terms net 30
getting error in F110 when run on 10/07/2006 :No pymt possible because items with a debit

Hi
Please check the grouping key on the vendor master record.
It could be just that the line items are grouped according to due date and are not able to offset each other.
The grouping key is on the automatic payment transactions block.
Hope this helps.

Credit memo cant add with cost 0.

Dear all
i have a customer , this upgrade he´s systema to 8.8 in 007 he can add invoices with some lines with cost 0 (cero) and then add his credit memo with (cost cero) in the stock audit the item has not cost cero. in 8.8 they cant do this. someting change in 8.8 for this paractice? ¿ how can i cancel this invoice? appears the error . error item with cost cero.
i hoppe your soon support.
regards
NANCY HERNANDEZ

Regads. aplied your propuse and everything is ok.
Nancy

Manage Items with Approval

Hi,
We have our Intranet site set up so that all users have 'Manage Items With Approval' privileges to every page group. However, the 'Manage Items with Approval' privileges doesn't allow the users to create pages in the page group. Is there any way to give users the ability to create pages from the navigator but still require approval for new items that they create?
Thanks,
Steven.

Hi Steven,
The MIWA privilege is intended for content contributor type of folks who are adding file/text content to an existing page - not the type of user you would want creating a page and being asked questions like what template, style to use, ACLs, etc.
Unfortunately we don't have a priv that matches up with your use case in the current release (10g). The good news is that the next release will include a feature that allows a page to be configured such that all content added to it (no matter what the assigned user privs) will go through an approval process.

Showing Items with no transactions

I am trying to build a report that will show us items with potentially incorrect item status. Item status (on table itmmas) is either A(ctive) or I(nactive). The report should show all Inactive items which have had at least one transaction in the past 4 weeks AND active items which have had no transactions in that period.
My plan is to join the item master table to the item ledger table (itmldg) which lists all inventory transactions. I can show the inactive items with transactions without a problem.
What I can't figure out is how to show items with Active Status that don't have any transactions. I can't get CR to return a data set which includes ALL records from itmmas but only those from itmldg in the last 4 weeks. I tried this SQL query:
SELECT itmmas.itmiid, itmmas.itmdes, itmmas.itmsts, itmldg.ilgdno, itmldg.ilgdat
FROM {oj itmmas LEFT OUTER JOIN itmldg ON itmmas.itmiid = itmldg.ilgiid}
WHERE (itmldg.ilgdat>={d '2009-09-01'})
When I run this query in MS Query and return the results to Excel, I get single lines for items with no transactions. For these items, the fields from itmldg are NULL. When I run this query in CR, I don't get any data for items with no transactions.
Can anyone think of a way to get this to work?

The issue that you have is that the WHERE clause in your SQL statement is only looking at an itmldg table field for a value. This is effectively making your Left Outer Join an Inner Join, because when an itmmas record does not have an itmldg record, the date field will be NULL. You have to add the condition "OR itmldg.ilgdat is null".
If you want to return ONLY the records that the report is interested in (which should have beter performance), change the SQL to
SELECT itmmas.itmiid, itmmas.itmdes, itmmas.itmsts, itmldg.ilgdno, itmldg.ilgdat
FROM {oj itmmas LEFT OUTER JOIN itmldg ON itmmas.itmiid = itmldg.ilgiid}
WHERE ((itmldg.ilgdat>={d '2009-09-01'}) and (itmmas.itmsts = 'I'))
or ((itmldg.ilgdat is null) and (itmmas.itmsts = 'A'))
HTH,
Carl

Issue with report (S_ALR_87013611) that is actual/plan line items for Cost

Hi Gurus,
I am having issue with the report (S_ALR_87013611) that is actual/plan line items for Cost Center.
When i execute the report for a cost element 510200 the amount is 23,380.13, but when i drill down on it by double click on that amount the value in obj curr is 15468.91. Hence there is the differnce. When i futher drill down by double click on the amont of 15468.91 and i go to display group currency and take the total it is 23380.13 and display in local / doc currency the amount is 15468.91. I guess due to this there is difference. The cost center & the cost elements are the same i have checket it.
My concerns is that the group curr is USD and obj curr / local curr is USD. So is group curr and doc curr is USD then when i click on dislay curr and select group curr why the amounts are changing.
Kindly adivce

Try to look if there is any filtering criteria applied in the report to which you drill-down.
The difference can be also caused by the "value type" - some reports show actual and statistical costs together in one column while the others strictly show (are defined to show) only e.g. actual costs (type 04) and not the statistical costs (type 11)

Transaction KSB1 - Display Actual Cost Line Items for Cost Centers

Hi,
When I run transaction KSB1 - Display Actual Cost Line Items for Cost Centers, all my offsetting accounts (accumulated depreciation accounts) are shown except for the ones for asset classes:
- Buildings
- PC & Small Applications
On the FI side, I can see transactions being posted to their relative accumulated depreciation accounts but I do not see this on the CO side when transaction KSB1 is executed. I have checked the config and the account assignments look correct. Also, the assets created have cost centers assigned to them.
Could you please help!
Thanks,
- Deki

Hi Murali,
I have one depreciation expense account (P/L Account) which is also a cost element.
During depreciation run, the different asset classes are supposed to hit the depreciation account above and their corresponding accumulated depreciation accounts (These are Balance Sheet Accounts and I have separate accounts for each asset class .. ie: Accumulated Depreciation for Furniture and Fixture for asset class Furniture and Fixture).
Now when I run transaction KSB1 - Display Actual Cost Line Items for Cost Centers, all my accumulated depreciation accounts are shown except for the ones for these asset classes:
- Buildings
- PC & Small Applications
Any thoughts on why the above aren't showing?
Thanks! I really appreciate your help!
- Deki

EC-CS Reconciliation of Financial Stmt Items with Group chart of account

Is there a report that can reconcile Financial Statement Items with group chart of accounts, and list any GL account or FS Item that are missing?
Thanks

.

Apply Fill Color to Group Item with Applescript

Is it possible to set the fill color of a group item using applescript and CS3? The group contains paths and text that have the same fill color with no strokes.I am able to select the group and delete it or move it (with applescript) but have had no success in setting the fill color.
Thank you in advance for help on this question. And thanks for everything I have picked up from browsing.

Now that I am addressing the path items and text items of the group separately I am having some success. Now I am having difficulty getting the correct terms for assigning a Spot Color to the file. Here is a piece of the script.
This works:
tell application "Adobe Illustrator"
set openDoc to document 1
set ftClr1 to (first group item whose note is "Front3") of openDoc
set ftClr1Paths to path items of ftClr1
repeat with thisPath in ftClr1Paths
set fill color of thisPath to {red:255}
end repeat
set textFrames to text frames of ftClr1
repeat with thistext in textFrames
set fill color of every line of thistext to {red:255}
end repeat
end tell
Need help to set the fill color to a Spot Color that already exists in Swatches.
Thanks
Nick

Item category group for Sales of Nonstock Item with Order Specific Procurem

What will be the item category & group for the material for Sales of Nonstock Item with Order Specific Procurement.So that purchase requestation is created

Hi
As of my Understanding this a scenario of THIRD PARTY SALE WITH SHIPMENT where delivery will be created . Addition to the previous setting few more changes that need to be accomodated like it has to be delivery related billing - A for item category
The indicator 'E' will make sure the Stock will be procured only against the particular sale order and it will be delivered only against this sales order. Apart from this there are few more thing need to be done with the Schedule line level
You need to give the movement type 601, item relevant for delivery need to be checked, order type from the MM side need to be assigned, item category from MM and Account assignment group from MM, all these need to to be maintianed in Schedule line level.
Infact why not TAS , we can use TAN , or ZTAN itself But as per the scenario we need to do the changes as required.
Doing all this we can process this order.
Thanks.................Rishi

TRANSACTION TO COPY A COST ELEMENT GROUP TO ACCT. GROUP (CONTR. OF KE61)

HI ,
is there a transaction which copies a cost element goup to an account group? I know there is a transaction which makes the opposite , the KE61.
Thanks and regards,Rino

Hi,
Have you try this transaction? KAVC (program RGSALECE)
Regards
A.C.

FEP Desktop Policies not compatible with GPMC Group Policy Results

Hello,
After aplying FEP default desktop policy I am not able to see Group Policy Results - policies for that computer.
I get this error:
The following errors were encountered: Registry value "%windir%\SoftwareDistribution\Datastore\Logs\Res*.jrs" is of unexpected type.
This is a standard exclusion in the installed FEP policy.
You can see only this error and nothing more. Sometimes it is another error mostly over registry value 2 or 3 or 4. It depens although the policy does not change.
I tested it by deleting all other policies from that OU. The only one Default Desktop policy was linked to it.
Also without FEP policy applied it workd as expected.
Is this a known issue?

Hello,
After aplying FEP default desktop policy I am not able to see Group Policy Results - policies for that computer.
I get this error:
The following errors were encountered: Registry value "%windir%\SoftwareDistribution\Datastore\Logs\Res*.jrs" is of unexpected type.
This is a standard exclusion in the installed FEP policy.
You can see only this error and nothing more. Sometimes it is another error mostly over registry value 2 or 3 or 4. It depens although the policy does not change.
I tested it by deleting all other policies from that OU. The only one Default Desktop policy was linked to it.
Also without FEP policy applied it workd as expected.
Is this a known issue?
It's still a problem. No-one has fixed it.
-=Chris

GR going to wrong GL account for PO Item with Account Assignment Category M

Hi Experts,
I need some help on GR posting for PO Item with M as AAC.
PO1 for material ABC with M as Account Assignment Category, when I book GR for this Item, the GL document generated as below.
Dr: PRD (Cost Price Differences)
Cr: WRX (GR/IR)
The material ABC price control is "S" and already have standard cost.
For another material DEF which have ascetically same master data as ABC and got a similar PO2 with M as Account Assignment Category.
But the GR document as below.
Dr: BSX (Inventory)
Cr: WRX (GR/IR)
How can be one same setting got so different results, is there any data in Material or PO make these differences?
Actually the results for material DEF is what we want, how could I avoid the GR results for material ABC.
Thanks~

Thanks you Mukthar,
I have checked all the information and porcess for both material and did a lot of testing in testing system.
Here is what I found.
Case
Material ABC SO: 1111 PO: 6666 (ACC:M)
Material DEF SO:2222 PO: 7777(ACC:M)
All the information in material mast data, SO, PO are the same.
The differences is that:
PO:6666 post GR before Material ABC's standard price release. So the first GR document as below
Dr: PRD (Cost Price Differences)
Cr: WRX (GR/IR)
This is correct document without material stand cost.
The problem we reverse the fist GR document, release standard cost for Material ABC. Then re-do the GR. but the GL document still book into PRD instead of BSX.
If I create a new SO:3333 and PO:8888 (with ACC M) for material ABC now.
The GR could be book into BSX.
It seem like once the PO got GR with 0 standard cost, even I relesed a new price for the material and re do the GR, it still take the previous 0 cost to book inventory which make all the amount into PRD.
Quite Strange

Transaction of item with cost-group 2614 results incost-group comingle

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for