Transaction support for OracleAQQueue

How is it possible to provide transaction support on OracleAQQueue enqueue and dequeue?
As far as i can tell, the queue operations are implicitly committed - or maybe im overlooking something fundamental?!

You may set OracleAQEnqueueOptions.VisibilityMode and/or OracleAQDequeueOptions.VisibilityMode to "OracleAQVisibilityMode.OnCommit" and wrap Enqueue and/or Dequeue operation in a local transaction to get the desired behavior.

Similar Messages

Is XA transactions supported for the SOA Suite 10.1.3.4 on weblogic platfor

There are 2 weblogic domains 1 & 2. Domain 1 hosts the JMS queue and domain 2 hosts the BPEL process. The BPEL process in domain 2 uses JMS adapter to get messages from domain 1. With queues on Weblogic domain 1, is XA transactions supported for the SOA suite 10.1.3.4 BPEL process JMS Adapter on weblogic domain 2?

There are 2 weblogic domains 1 & 2. Domain 1 hosts the JMS queue and domain 2 hosts the BPEL process. The BPEL process in domain 2 uses JMS adapter to get messages from domain 1. With queues on Weblogic domain 1, is XA transactions supported for the SOA suite 10.1.3.4 BPEL process JMS Adapter on weblogic domain 2?

Transaction Support for message broker channel

Hi all,
I have created a JPD and subscribing to an MB channel and listening for messages, suppose the message is delivered to the JPD i.e onMessage is invoked successfully, but at the next node there is an exception thrown, so I want to rollback all the stuff done and also pushback the message to the channel, (and if possible get the message back to the JPD by retrying the entire tranaction).
1. Can the message be pushed back to the channel?
2. Will the channel try to send the same message again to the JPD incase we rollback and wait again at onMessage in the same JPD by means of exceptional path (retry count)?
3. Is the message available for consumption for other subscribers incase we are able to pushback the message to the channel?
4. Bottomline - How can I include the MB channel(message delivery) within transactional boundary?
TIA
Abhishek

Hi kai/All,
Thanks for ur response, but I still have some questions.
1. If the message is not going to be pushed back to the channel, what exactly do we mean by "retry"(is it that I have to resubscribe(and wait at onMessage call in my subscriber jpd) to the channel, and wait for the same message to be pusblished by the publisher JPD)?
Also my requirement is - I am having number of subscriber(JPD instances say workflow JPDs) to the same channel and using filters to deliver the message to the appropriate workflow JPD instance, So, One and only one instance can listen for a particular message, so incase there is an exception in a particular workflow JPD, no other instance can cover for it beacuse of a particualr filter value for the message subscription. How can I overcome this shortcoming?
TIA
Abhishek

Transaction support for LC Java API?

Hi everybody,
I'm using the LC Java API to make some stuff with the LC ES like file converting, create and apply of policies, and reader extending and I will wrap this actions in a single transaction - e.g. if the applying of a policy fails, the document should not be reader enabled or stuff like this.
I've found some classes in the LiveDoc specification - com.adobe.idp.dsc.transaction.* -, but no examples, how to use it.
Can somebody help me with a code snippet or tip?
Thanks & regards
Angel

You can only do this at your own logic, because these operations are not atomic .

Reg: Is it possible in weblogic 5.1 or 6 to get Transaction suport for MQseries & Oracle

          Hi
          I would like to know whether weblogic 5.1 or 6 provides support in a single transaction,
          transaction support for both oracle and MQseires, if so where can i find suitable
          documentation on this topic
          with regards
          Priya


The answer is definitely yes, starting in WLS 6.0, with
          some two reasonable limitations.
          There are limitations are the following:
          1. It must be on the server side. The registration of the XAResource
          can't happen in a client. It must happen in a startup class
          or EJB or servlet, etc. You can start it from a client (invoke
          an EJB or servlet) but the resource work must be
          on the server side.
          2. MQSeries can't be included if it is being used to drive a
          Message Driven Bean. Because the message is passed
          from MQ Series to WLS outside of a transaction, after
          which WLS will start a transaction (if so configured) and
          pass it to the MDB, the MQ Series message is not part
          of the transaction. The JavaSoft specs don't handle this case.
          For WLS JMS, this works because we have defined such
          an interface and implemented it. At least one other vendor
          understands the importance of having this feature and is
          interested in implementing it (it's not IBM).
          So to do what you want, it is necessary to:
          1. Use the XAResource version of the JDBC driver for Oracle.
          WLS is smart enough to look at the driver and see if it
          implements the XAResource interface and automatically
          register it as a resource. This has been documented
          in this newsgroup already or see
          http://e-docs/wls/docs60/adminguide/jdbc.html#1075694.
          2. Register the XAResource interface for MQSeries programmatically
          in the application. The code to do this has been posted
          at the BEA developer site for a few months in an article
          entitled "Using JTA Transactions to envelope WLS JMS and
          IBM MQSeries" (could I be more explicit), located at
          http://developer.bea.com/docs/jmsjta.jsp. It references
          another document that has more code, describing how to
          plug in a "foreign" (non-WLS) JMS provider, of which MQSeries
          is one, in a non-transaction manner (you need to do that
          first and then just add the resource registration) - see
          http://developer.bea.com/docs/jmsproviders.jsp.
          All of the necessary code is included in the documents (including
          how to download and install the Java libraries for MQSeries).
          Several people have told me that they have been able to
          use this as a starting place for their applications.
          You might also want to look at the JMS FAQ at
          http://developer.bea.com/docs/jmsfaq.jsp.
          In 6.1, support is added for importing foreign transactions.
          That means that in 6.0, WLS can drive a transaction with
          WLS JMS, Oracle, and MQ series, with WLS being the
          driving force. In WLS 6.1, a non-WLS transaction manager can
          drive a transaction that includes (transactionally infects)
          WLS resources (like WLS JMS).
          There are no white papers that I know of in this area and I haven't
          tested it myself (the goal is to have someone try out
          having WebSphere drive a transaction with WLS resources, soon).
          "Priya" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
          >
          > Hi
          >
          > I would like to know whether weblogic 5.1 or 6 provides support in a single transaction,
          > transaction support for both oracle and MQseires, if so where can i find suitable
          > documentation on this topic
          >
          > with regards
          > Priya

HT1918 Please contact itunes support for this transaction?

i created apple ID, when i log in, it says review your account, then i fill out my credit card info, and i click on continue, it says please contact your itunes support for this transaction? I can't download apps but i can log in on apple website

Welcome to the Apple community.
Have you tried doing what it says, I'm contacting support.
Express Lane (select your country, navigate to iCloud help and enter the serial number of one of your devices)

Weblogic server 9.2 support for WS-Transaction

Hi,
Does Weblogic Server9.2 support WS-Transaction 1.1 ? The WL Server data sheet is not specific about the details of compliance. I am trying to find out if there is support for WS-Coordination, WS-Atomic Transaction and WS-Business Activity in Weblogic Server.
We need to use the Aqualogic Service Bus 2.6 is a distributed WebService Transaction.

As I know, the answer is "no".

Want to purchase something but they keep asking for ITunes support for transaction

I wanted to purchase something for my game but they keep on asking for iTunes's support for transaction,why and how to solve it?

Click here and request assistance.
(69552)

The partner transaction manager has disabled its support for remote/network transactions....When inserting during trigger in linked server

Hi All,
I am getting below error while inserting into Linked Server (sql2012) thru trigger from sql2008 ....However if i insert the same thru Store Procedure it is inserting successfully....MSDTC service is started on both sql server machines....also both machines
rebooted....but still i am facing this error.
OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "XXX.XXX.XXX.XX" returned message "The partner transaction manager has disabled its support for remote/network transactions.".
Msg 7391, Level 16, State 2, Procedure ins_test, Line 11
The operation could not be performed because OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "XXX.XXX.XXX.XX" was unable to begin a distributed transaction.
Could assist to resolve.
Regards
Shehzad

Hi SHzKhan,
According to your error message, we need to verify if you configure the MSDTC correctly, When you have more than one SQL Server involved in a Distributed Transaction, you need to make some changes to the default configuration of MSDTC for these distributed
transactions to succeed. There is a detail about recommending MSDTC settings for using Distributed Transactions in SQL Server, you can review the following article.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2027550/en-us
There is a similar issue about error 7391, you can refer to the following link.
http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/30235/msg-7391-distributed-transactions-dtc-on-sql-server
Regards,
Sofiya Li
Sofiya Li
TechNet Community Support

TS3297 For my game purchase cannot be success .. After I click on the icon for the purchase they will show me contact I-tunes support for complete the transaction ....for I have already contact AppleCare for assist.... And they told me is the server syste

For my game purchase cannot be success .. After I click on the icon for the purchase they will show me contact I-tunes support for complete the transaction ....for I have already contact AppleCare for assist.... And they told me is the server system down
Kindly get back to me ASAP!
Thanks.

Jay cole Ong wrote:
After I click on the icon for the purchase they will show me contact I-tunes support for complete the transaction ....
To Contact iTunes Support...
Use this Link > Apple Support iTunes Store Contact

HT4009 iTunes support for transaction

J ai rencontre un problème d'amis mes achats sur IN APP . Après acceptation d achats on me renvoi le message contact iTunes store pour support for transaction et après je ne peut plus continuer l achat. Merci de me débloquer.

These are user-to-user forums, you can contact iTunes support here : http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/contact/ - click on Express Lane, then iTunes > iTunes Store

Contact itune support for complete the transaction

when i try to purchase items from inside of app.
it keep saying that contact itune support for complete the transaction and
it wont go thru.

Do exactly what it told you to do and contact itunes support.

Support for Bourgogne Transaction Interface

Does the Weblogic Server support the transaction extension of EJB Transactions?
Since Bourgogne introduce new transactional primitives allowing to establish flow control dependencies between transactions, to delegate bean objects from a ransaction to another transaction, and to give permissions to access bean objects locked by a transaction.

No, there is no support for this transaction model in WebLogic.

Selective XML Index feature is not supported for the current database version , SQL Server Extended Events , Optimizing Reading from XML column datatype

Team , Thanks for looking into this ..
As a last resort on optimizing my stored procedure ( Below ) i wanted to create a Selective XML index ( Normal XML indexes doesn't seem to be improving performance as needed ) but i keep getting this error within my stored proc . Selective XML
Index feature is not supported for the current database version.. How ever
EXECUTE sys.sp_db_selective_xml_index; return 1 , stating Selective XML Indexes are enabled on my current database .
Is there ANY alternative way i can optimize below stored proc ?
Thanks in advance for your response(s) !
/****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[MN_Process_DDLSchema_Changes] Script Date: 3/11/2015 3:10:42 PM ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
-- EXEC [dbo].[MN_Process_DDLSchema_Changes]
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[MN_Process_DDLSchema_Changes]
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON --Does'nt have impact ( May be this wont on SQL Server Extended events session's being created on Server(s) , DB's )
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED
select getdate() as getdate_0
DECLARE @XML XML , @Prev_Insertion_time DATETIME
-- Staging Previous Load time for filtering purpose ( Performance optimize while on insert )
SET @Prev_Insertion_time = (SELECT MAX(EE_Time_Stamp) FROM dbo.MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log ) -- Perf Optimize
-- PRINT '1'
CREATE TABLE #Temp
EventName VARCHAR(100),
Time_Stamp_EE DATETIME,
ObjectName VARCHAR(100),
ObjectType VARCHAR(100),
DbName VARCHAR(100),
ddl_Phase VARCHAR(50),
ClientAppName VARCHAR(2000),
ClientHostName VARCHAR(100),
server_instance_name VARCHAR(100),
ServerPrincipalName VARCHAR(100),
nt_username varchar(100),
SqlText NVARCHAR(MAX)
CREATE TABLE #XML_Hold
ID INT NOT NULL IDENTITY(1,1) PRIMARY KEY , -- PK necessity for Indexing on XML Col
BufferXml XML
select getdate() as getdate_01
INSERT INTO #XML_Hold (BufferXml)
SELECT
CAST(target_data AS XML) AS BufferXml -- Buffer Storage from SQL Extended Event(s) , Looks like there is a limitation with xml size ?? Need to re-search .
FROM sys.dm_xe_session_targets xet
INNER JOIN sys.dm_xe_sessions xes
ON xes.address = xet.event_session_address
WHERE xes.name = 'Capture DDL Schema Changes' --Ryelugu : 03/05/2015 Session being created withing SQL Server Extended Events
--RETURN
--SELECT * FROM #XML_Hold
select getdate() as getdate_1
-- 03/10/2015 RYelugu : Error while creating XML Index : Selective XML Index feature is not supported for the current database version
CREATE SELECTIVE XML INDEX SXI_TimeStamp ON #XML_Hold(BufferXml)
FOR
PathTimeStamp ='/RingBufferTarget/event/timestamp' AS XQUERY 'node()'
--RETURN
--CREATE PRIMARY XML INDEX [IX_XML_Hold] ON #XML_Hold(BufferXml) -- Ryelugu 03/09/2015 - Primary Index
--SELECT GETDATE() AS GETDATE_2
-- RYelugu 03/10/2015 -Creating secondary XML index doesnt make significant improvement at Query Optimizer , Instead creation takes more time , Only primary should be good here
--CREATE XML INDEX [IX_XML_Hold_values] ON #XML_Hold(BufferXml) -- Ryelugu 03/09/2015 - Primary Index , --There should exists a Primary for a secondary creation
--USING XML INDEX [IX_XML_Hold]
---- FOR VALUE
-- --FOR PROPERTY
-- FOR PATH
--SELECT GETDATE() AS GETDATE_3
--PRINT '2'
-- RETURN
SELECT GETDATE() GETDATE_3
INSERT INTO #Temp
EventName ,
Time_Stamp_EE ,
ObjectName ,
ObjectType,
DbName ,
ddl_Phase ,
ClientAppName ,
ClientHostName,
server_instance_name,
nt_username,
ServerPrincipalName ,
SqlText
SELECT
p.q.value('@name[1]','varchar(100)') AS eventname,
p.q.value('@timestamp[1]','datetime') AS timestampvalue,
p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS objectname,
p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_type"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') AS ObjectType,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="database_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS databasename,
p.q.value('(./data[@name="ddl_phase"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') AS ddl_phase,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="client_app_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS clientappname,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="client_hostname"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS clienthostname,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="server_instance_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS server_instance_name,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="nt_username"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS nt_username,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="server_principal_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') AS serverprincipalname,
p.q.value('(./action[@name="sql_text"]/value)[1]','Nvarchar(max)') AS sqltext
FROM #XML_Hold
CROSS APPLY BufferXml.nodes('/RingBufferTarget/event')p(q)
WHERE -- Ryelugu 03/05/2015 - Perf Optimize - Filtering the Buffered XML so as not to lookup at previoulsy loaded records into stage table
p.q.value('@timestamp[1]','datetime') >= ISNULL(@Prev_Insertion_time ,p.q.value('@timestamp[1]','datetime'))
AND p.q.value('(./data[@name="ddl_phase"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') ='Commit' --Ryelugu 03/06/2015 - Every Event records a begin version and a commit version into Buffer ( XML ) we need the committed version
AND p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_type"]/text)[1]','varchar(100)') <> 'STATISTICS' --Ryelugu 03/06/2015 - May be SQL Server Internally Creates Statistics for #Temp tables , we do not want Creation of STATISTICS Statement to be logged
AND p.q.value('(./data[@name="object_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') NOT LIKE '%#%' -- Any stored proc which creates a temp table within it Extended Event does capture this creation statement SQL as well , we dont need it though
AND p.q.value('(./action[@name="client_app_name"]/value)[1]','varchar(100)') <> 'Replication Monitor' --Ryelugu : 03/09/2015 We do not want any records being caprutred by Replication Monitor ??
SELECT GETDATE() GETDATE_4
-- SELECT * FROM #TEMP
-- SELECT COUNT(*) FROM #TEMP
-- SELECT GETDATE()
-- RETURN
-- PRINT '3'
--RETURN
INSERT INTO [dbo].[MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log]
[UserName]
,[DbName]
,[ObjectName]
,[client_app_name]
,[ClientHostName]
,[ServerName]
,[SQL_TEXT]
,[EE_Time_Stamp]
,[Event_Name]
SELECT
CASE WHEN T.nt_username IS NULL OR LEN(T.nt_username) = 0 THEN t.ServerPrincipalName
ELSE T.nt_username
END
,T.DbName
,T.objectname
,T.clientappname
,t.ClientHostName
,T.server_instance_name
,T.sqltext
,T.Time_Stamp_EE
,T.eventname
FROM
#TEMP T
/** -- RYelugu 03/06/2015 - Filters are now being applied directly while retrieving records from BUFFER or on XML
-- Ryelugu 03/15/2015 - More filters are likely to be added on further testing
WHERE ddl_Phase ='Commit'
AND ObjectType <> 'STATISTICS' --Ryelugu 03/06/2015 - May be SQL Server Internally Creates Statistics for #Temp tables , we do not want Creation of STATISTICS Statement to be logged
AND ObjectName NOT LIKE '%#%' -- Any stored proc which creates a temp table within it Extended Event does capture this creation statement SQL as well , we dont need it though
AND T.Time_Stamp_EE >= @Prev_Insertion_time --Ryelugu 03/05/2015 - Performance Optimize
AND NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM [dbo].[MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log] MN
WHERE MN.[ServerName] = T.server_instance_name -- Ryelugu Server Name needes to be added on to to xml ( Events in session )
AND MN.[DbName] = T.DbName
AND MN.[Event_Name] = T.EventName
AND MN.[ObjectName]= T.ObjectName
AND MN.[EE_Time_Stamp] = T.Time_Stamp_EE
AND MN.[SQL_TEXT] =T.SqlText -- Ryelugu 03/05/2015 This is a comparision Metric as well , But needs to decide on
-- Peformance Factor here , Will take advise from Lance if comparision on varchar(max) is a vital idea
--SELECT GETDATE()
--PRINT '4'
--RETURN
SELECT
top 100
[EE_Time_Stamp]
,[ServerName]
,[DbName]
,[Event_Name]
,[ObjectName]
,[UserName]
,[SQL_TEXT]
,[client_app_name]
,[Created_Date]
,[ClientHostName]
FROM
[dbo].[MN_DDLSchema_Changes_log]
ORDER BY [EE_Time_Stamp] desc
-- select getdate()
-- ** DELETE EVENTS after logging into Physical table
-- NEED TO Identify if this @XML can be updated into physical system table such that previously loaded events are left untoched
-- SET @XML.modify('delete /event/class/.[@timestamp="2015-03-06T13:01:19.020Z"]')
-- SELECT @XML
SELECT GETDATE() GETDATE_5
END
GO
Rajkumar Yelugu

@@Version : ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Microsoft SQL Server 2012 - 11.0.5058.0 (X64)
   May 14 2014 18:34:29
   Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation
   Developer Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.2 <X64> (Build 9200: ) (Hypervisor)
(1 row(s) affected)
Compatibility level is set to 110 .
One of the limitation states - XML columns with a depth of more than 128 nested nodes
How do i verify this ? Thanks .
Rajkumar Yelugu

SAP Support for Classic G/L in ECC 6.0 and above

Hello,
Running an SAP upgrade project from 4.6C to ECC 6.0 (EHP6). The customer is running the existing release since the past 8 years with FI/CO, MM,SD,PM and HCM modules.
We are exploring the possibilities and repercussions of moving on to new G/L from the legacy classic G/L. Please have a look at the mentioned points for replies accordingly.
1. As far as I understand, if need to seamlessly transit in the ECC 6.0 with New G/L in a way that the old transactional data, and all balances are retained with historical records, then we need to purchase the SAP New G/L Migration Services, and this would be lead and done by SAP. There is no alternate way of doing it solely by our ownself, Is this correct ?. If we engage SAP for this migration exercise and consulting then does it ensure that all historical data and balances are moved intact in the new G/L environment and from an end user perspective all transactional done to date before moving in ECC 6.0 are retained.
2. I guess we still need to review the integration impact of the new G/L for all other modules, is there a substantial rework to be done or with minimal effort, new account assignments and related configuration can be altered .
3. If we don't opt for SAP G/L Migration service but still want to activate and use the new G/L and profit center accounting, then as far as myself and my team assess, we need to decide a cutover date and gather the balances/open items from the legacy G/L and upload them to the new G/L in ECC 6.0, just as it would be the case for a fresh new implementation for a customer coming from non-SAP environment. If this is correct then :
The customer will lose all historical, detailed transactional data with respect to the legacy G/L and relevant originating entries. In such case for any business reporting requirement, the customer has to keep a separate PRD server alive in a dormant state for fetching the data before the transition in ECC 6.0 environment. Is this the correct understanding and the only possible approach, can there be a better way of ensuring the availability of historical data.
In such a case of doing a cutover data migration from old G/L to new G/L, do we have to upload the rest of the master/transactional data for all other modules as well, enacting a situation that all of them started as fresh new modules in ECC.6.0, or the legacy master / transactional data for all other modules can be kept intact for historical purposes. (examples, all vendors and PO / sales order and customer master / employee master and all payroll historical records for past 8 years).
4. Any indication or official SAP note, that for how long SAP intends to support the legacy G/L in the upcoming ECC versions. It is necessary to know in case the customer currently opts for still continuing with the classic G/L in ECC 6.0 , but we have a lurking danger that SAP would stop the support and availability of legacy classic G/L in the near future. So to a have a long term sustainable benefit, we might deliberate with the customer to take a bitter sip now , and move on to the new G/L with all its bells/whistles and the nuisances it might bring in terms of historical transaction data unavailability.
I hope i was able to make my scenario clearly understandable for having some valuable input from the forum members.
Thanks a lot for reading and replying.

Hi Syed,
From Technical basis perspective there is not much work in newGL migration apart from application and database tuning.
Time taken for migrating to newGL will depend upon number of open items available in the system at the time of migration.
Most of your queries are functional and suggestion would be to move this thread to ERP Financials.
For your information you may go through below links
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/ae/b3569044974c6985c4e711e20435d6/content.htm
http://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPFI/NewGL+Migration+Scenarios
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Deepak Kori

Transaction support for OracleAQQueue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for