Transform from Business Process Expert to Value Scenario Experts !!!!

Hi Business Process Experts,
Its time to think ahead for all of us to be in line with SAP Business Suite 7.0
SAP Business Suite 7:
Establish Process Excellence, Lower Costs, And Capture Opportunities
SAP Business Suite software provides best industry practices with industry-specific applications and the core applications of SAP Business Suite:
SAP Customer Relationship Management
SAP ERP (enterprise resource planning)
SAP Product Lifecycle Management
SAP Supply Chain Management
SAP Supplier Relationship Management
No more stovepipes -> Flexible end-to-end processes
Deploy as you go -> Stepwise projects and installation
No more upgrades -> Enhancement package = innovation packages
Dynamic -> Re-usable enterprise services
Industry-focused -> Delivers integrated industry solutions
Extensible -> Easy expansion beyond ERP
Choose Which Value Theme belongs to your current Business Process ??
7 power packed themes and value scenarios:
(1) High Performance Assets
-Ready to Run (Efficient Design / Build / Commission)
-Manage by Exception (Visibility and Optimization)
-Run the Asset (Maximum Uptime)
-Intangible Property Management
-Stay Safe (Keep in Compliance)
(2) Operational Excellence
-Lean Manufacturing
-Integrated Sourcing and Procurement
-Integrated Logistics
-Efficient After-Sales Service
-Continuous Performance Improvement
(3) Product and Service Leadership
-Continuous Product Innovation
-Integrated Product Development
-Embedded Product Compliance
-Product Delivered as a Service
(4) Responsive Supply Networks
-Collaborative Demand and Supply Planning
-Manufacturing Network Planning and Execution
-Logistics and Fulfillment Management
-Characteristic based planning and execution
-Service Parts Management
-Supplier Network Management
(5) Superior Customer Value-Optimize Sales and Marketing Investments
-Creating the Optimal Offer
-Seamless Order Fulfillment
-Differentiate though Service Excellence
-Customer Centric Marketing
-Accelerated Lead to Cash
(6) Financial Excellence-Gain Efficiency in Finance
-Optimize Working Capital
-Drive Strategy and Growth
-Manage Risk and Compliance
(7) Best People and Talent-Building the Workforce
-High Performing Organization
-Sales Force Performance
-Compliant Workforce

"Transform from Business Process Expert to Value Scenario Experts !!!!"

Similar Messages

Message are sending from Business Process take a lot of time

Hallo,
in my BP there is the problem that the sending takes a lot of time. I see for example that mapping are not going. How can find the problem; the queues are empty. This seams a generell problem because all processes are effected.
Thanks in advance,
Frank

Frank,
Can ou give more details?
Are you using a BPM? What are the steps in the BPM? What is the step that is taking a lot of time etc?
Meanwhile, this tuning guide will prove handy,
<a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/70ada5ef-0201-0010-1f8b-c935e444b0ad">SAP Exchange Infrastructure Tuning Guide XI 3.0</a>
Regards
Bhavesh

Exporting Design steps of Business Process Components from QC to excel using macro

I want to export design steps from Business Process Components from QC to excel using macro. CAn anyone please help me with that.
Thnx, Sanket

Post Author: swat
CA Forum: Exporting
Hi,
Of what i gather from ur scenario...this is what i did in one of my reports.
I had to use two subreports and they had to occupy one cell each, in line with other fields.
To obtain that,all the fields required in the subreport i put them into a text box.Therein restricting the fields to the txt box only...
Then import that sub-report as it is.
It worked for me....
try out...
All this only if've understood u right...

SD config usage from business perspective

Hello Experts,
I am trying to find the best description to describe SD configuration from a business perspective.
For example, this is what i have in mind:
1. Sales doc : cater for your different business transactions.
2. ITC : cater for different types of billing for your items.
3. SLC : cater for different movement types.
4. Copy control : ???
5. Pricing :
I am quite an inexperience SD person. Hope you can share with me how you would describe the functionality and purpose of the configuration tools from business process solutioning perspective.
regards
John

Hi John,
Just trying to summerize :-
Sales Doc Type :--
Sales document type is an indicator which enables system to process different business transactions in different ways. Various document types are pre-configured in system and can be used for various scenarios.It can determine
whether the sales doc of that type are blocked or not ;No ranges for the sdocuments;whether a reference doc is mandatory or not whether it should read cus.material info record
ITC :--
Item categories are defined to provide additional control functions for the sales documents. Item category controls the processing of an item in a Transaction.Item Category is determined in a Transaction by 4 factors Combination
ITEM CATEGORY =SALES DOC TYPE + ITEM CATEGORY GROUP + USAGE + HIGHER LEVEL + ITEM CATEGORY
For example, the item category controls the type and scope of:
-Pricing
-Billing
-Delivery
-Inventory posting
-Transfer of requirements
I-tems in stock, and value and text items are item categories
SLC :--
Schedule line category is nothing but delivery date and delivery quantity.Schedule line category is determine by
Item Category Group+ MRP Or No MRP.
Different control elements are also defined for the schedule lines. For example, for some schedule lines, material requirements planning is not carried out; for other schedule lines, it is carried out. Also goods receipt, not goods issue, is posted for a schedule line defined in a returns document.
Copy Control :--
WE can use copy control to define the requirements and options when transfering the data from reference document
to its subsequent document .Copy controle in the other words we can say as copy the data from source document to
target document .
FOR sales document-copy control options are sales document to sales document and copy controle -billing document to
sales document .THe copy control rules set up to enable a sales document type to be copied into another sales document type such as quotation to sales order and sales order to sales order .
Pricing :--
The term pricing is used broadly to describe the calculation of prices (for external use by customers or vendors) and costs (for internal purposes, such as cost accounting). Conditions represent a set of circumstances that apply when a price is calculated. For example, a particular customer orders a certain quantity of a particular product on a certain day. The variable factors here - the customer, the product, the order quantity, the date - determine the final price the customer gets. The information about each of these factors can be stored in the system as master data. This master data is stored in the form of condition records.
The primary job of a pricing procedure is to define a group of condition types in a particular sequence.
Thanks/Rajesh
Edited by: Lakshmipathi on Apr 15, 2011 9:53 AM
Please dont copy paste from other source; instead provide the link or explain in your own style

Business Process Management Tool Evaluation ARIS or Systems Architect?

Hi Group
I have joined this community yesterday, so I am pretty much new here.
I work as a Business Process Analyst for a semi govt company. I have been tasked for evaluating a tool for business process management.
Current scenario is as under:
1) We are using Microsoft visio as a mapping software
2) BPMN standards for process modelling
3) The design phase of our new ERP software will be starting soon.
4) My company has got vision to become BPM company over the years, we are at very early stage of it.
The questions I have are,
1) Is it worth getting ARIS or System Architect at this stage only for modelling. If now what are the justifications?
2) Based on your experience what are the steps involved in evaluating such tools
3) How hard is it to import those visio drawings into ARIS or System Architect
Your response is much appreciated
Thanks
Hemal

Hi,
My view (I work as an Enterprise Architect for a very large Resources Company).
Visio is a drawing tool. It produces nice diagrams and drawings which have no real connection with the process objects, or system objects they represent. typically an organisation ends up with 1,000's of these e diagrams which end up all having to be maintained (and usually are not) so quickly end up being largely out of date and useless.
Tools like ARIS and other BPM tools, are purpose built Modelling tools. The Process Models built, and each and every object they are composed of are stored in a single, searchable and reportable object oriented database. Each object (if the tool is implemented correctly) has exactly 1 original keyed by a Globally unique Identifier. Other occurrences or copies of that object can be created that are used in multiple places, in multiple processes. Hence maintenance should be easier. If a change is required to the object, change it in one place only, and its automatically also updated in all the other object copies or occurrences. try that with Visio.
Further, if the models are created using the required and correct notation (for example BPMN or BPEL, then they may be exported into or integrated into application or execution layers that support these notations. Usually this is a part automatic, and part manual process. Hence the BPM models are living representations (not 100% but at least some %) of the running code or processes in your systems.
Eventually the nirvana will be when this model to execution paradigm is 100% automated, for 100% of business processes, across any platform or system architecture required. A good dream eh!
The proviso is that all this is designed, built and governed correctly. Like most things, the idea can be good, but the execution bad.
There are several examples of BPM Modelling tools that are available as free downloads. Savvion, Tibco and Intallio are 3 that come to mind that do this. Perhaps try one or more?
ARIS has the advantage that it is more integrated with SAP than any of the others.
The other think that has influenced us toward ARIS is that SAP now use it internally (so I am told) to define and govern the services that end up in their products. the Process is called PIC (Process Integration Content).
There is a separate thread on it Do SAP Plan to Productise the PIC Internal Process for Customers & ISV's?.
Hope this helps.
Phil G.
Message was edited by:
Phil Gleadhill

Business Process Oriented Development of Data Warehouse Structures

I've recenltly read an interesting paper by Michael Böhnlein and Achim Ulbrich-vom Ende:
Business Process Oriented Development of Data Warehouse Structures .
It discusses the derivation of data warehouse structures from business process models, as opposed to deriving relevant datasets from the underlying operational data sources.
The Semantic Object Model (SOM) methodology is also introduced. The SOM approach can be useful for the modeling of business systems as well as analysis and design.
Cheers, Davide

I've recenltly read an interesting paper by Michael Böhnlein and Achim Ulbrich-vom Ende:
Business Process Oriented Development of Data Warehouse Structures .
It discusses the derivation of data warehouse structures from business process models, as opposed to deriving relevant datasets from the underlying operational data sources.
The Semantic Object Model (SOM) methodology is also introduced. The SOM approach can be useful for the modeling of business systems as well as analysis and design.
Cheers, Davide

Re: What is a Business Process Expert?

Hello all,
Maybe we should open the discussion a bit beyond a "Human Centric" BPX. The main theme after all IS "The Business Process". There are hundreds, possibly thousands of Business Processes depending upon whether you categorize as micro or macro processes. Any one of these either on a micro/macro level function with or without human beings and may utilize machines that assist or automate value added activities/processes which produce higher value service or products in the age old scenario [input > process > useful output & waste output].
When we talk about Expert or Expertise, we are talking about precise know-how, and narrow domain knowledge wether depth or breadth knowledge.
Referring back to a post by Luis Rincones, regarding ideas and concepts leading to BPX, automation of the business process should be the KEY focus of a BP engineer. Back in the late 80's early 90's, we referred to these BP engrs. as "Knowledge Engineers" and their principal goals were to interview "Experts" in order to extract expert knowledge (sometimes 20+ years of experience) and understand not only the flow of the process, but more importantly the RULES which govern all exceptions and variations encountered within the process, as well as "rules of thumb" in case the RULES don't apply.
This is something which if we are truly to orient our Enterprise SOA architecture towards the goals of BPX mentioned above, will require a common "Rule Based Engine", which lives across all domains of knowledge, Objects, & environments, and works together with the design & development environment for the xAPP (I like to refer to them as "Expert Applications") and thereby enable not only the integration and homogenization of input data (via the technology stack), but also integrate the application of logic via a common rule based engine. In this way, E-SOA can also be enabled on the "useful" outbound process enabling services (actions) which mediate/manage/automate the process back to prescribed operating parameters.
Of course, people can not be eliminated from the process. Lexus factory in Korea back in 2002 operated with approx. 60 or so people, 150 robots, and produced >300 units per day. People were mostly involved in QA and deviation functions.
Automating the Business Process optimizes the output:input ratio and should minimize the waste:useful output ratio. By doing so, the ROI, ROA, and operating margins are maximized and competitive advantage gains against other not so able competitors.
Any one else has a few words on this?

You raise a very important and interesting question regarding whether there is any framework for narrowing down the domain of a Business Process Expert.
There are many frameworks out there:
http://www.bpmg.org/8omega.php
http://www.prosci.com/tutorial-design-mod1.htm
http://www.intel.com/technology/itj/2004/volume08issue04/art11_collaboration/p01_abstract.htm
From my experience, it is beneficial to focus on a critical "life support" process for the corporation. Many times this can be started at the top level COO for instance, asking what is the # 1 thing which causes issues with customers, collections, services, etc.. One such item is "contract to cash" and specific sub-components of this process such as "unbilled hours" which if corrected prior to billing issuance will result in more accurate Invoices, and collections. An improvement of this nature shortens the cycle time of billing to collection, or hour entry to billing calculation, and with improved accuracy increases cash flow and lowers cost per transaction.
What you are suggesting in terms of Media expert, etc.. is more associated with Roles which are aligned with Solution Scenarios within SAP. Business Processes may span many roles, and are critical to the application being developed.
I believe this is the purpose of BPM, but would welcome any further comments from colleagues regarding framework.
Please take a look at the following BLOG as well as Lakshmikanth does a very good job explaning the landscape:
/people/lakshmikanth.adiraju/blog/2006/09/19/soa-bpm-business-applications-netweaver-happy-customer
Message was edited by: Fermin Iduate

Separation of business processes in IDoc scenarios

Hello!
We have implemented an IDoc -> XI -> IDoc scenario with complex mappings and enhanced receiver determination using the value mapping API in which about 15 different R/3 platforms send IDocs to XI for internal ordering.
All R/3s are using standard IDoc types like DELFOR.DELFOR02, DESADV.DELVRY03, ORDCHG.ORDERS05, ORDERS.ORDERS05 and ORDRSP.ORDERS05. As XI gets more and more used additional projects are coming up in which we will also use exactly the same IDoc types.
Especially when using enhanced receiver determination it now gets extremely difficult to separate the different business processes once they use the same IDoc types. The projects do not only share the same receiver determination object but what is even worse they also share the same message mapping object to determine the receiver. This makes development, testing and MTP extremely difficult and requires coordination over several project teams.
Within R/3 business scenarios can easily be separated using different message codes and message functions. However, once the R/3 post IDocs to XI there is no clear separation possible any more.
Of course, every project can implement own Java classes for enhanced receiver determination and transport the archives separately but still the problem is that all the projects using the same IDoc message type share the same message mapping object to the determine the receiver. This means that it would be necessary to fill the input parameters for the enhanced receiver determination classes of ALL projects within the same object. Either by putting logic in the graphical mapping or writing another Java function to call the different Java classes for enhanced receiver determination based on the message code and message function.
From a design perspective it is no good approach to mingle logic for different projects and business scenarios in the same development objects. What alternatives do we have? Does SAP plan to support a separation using message code and message function for IDoc scenarios in the Integration Repository?
Regards, Tanja

Hello!
Does nobody have any comments on this?
Regards, Tanja

What is a Business Process Expert? and Business Analyst?

In response to Sinem Dorter's very interesting and informative blog about Composite Analytics at Whirpool, I'd like to ask how people would really define what is going on there.
Are modelers of composite applications business analysts? Business process experts? Application specialists? All of the above? None of the above?
What unique skills are required to distinguish, say, a business analyst from a business process expert?
And can a business process expert be a team of people: maybe an enterprise analyst, a business process expert and an IT application specialist?
I'm curious to read responses.
Judy

Hi Judy,
I agree with you. Sinems blog from Whirlpool is really interesting and well written.
Thanks a lot that you have the courage to open the first discussion in relation to her blog.
Now to your question what's the difference between a Business Process Expert and a Business Analyst.
Definition of a Business Analyst
Please find below a small section of the Roles and Responsibility Matrix of SAP xApp Analytics . You will find it also in our OKP (Online Knowledge Product) of Analytics in Service Marketplace, alias rkt-analytics.
- Responsible for assessing the business requirements
- Communicate with the business users for project
requirements
- Act as the critical link between end users business
requirements and data architecture solution together
with the Application Developer
- Possess and provide deep knowledge of current business
scenarios such as: SAP BW Business Explorer Queries
and SAP CRM, SRM, MIC
- Design and develop a data access solution
- Understand SAP Analytics models and become an expert
on Analytics
- Conduct Analytics workshops
- Create and provide business requirements documentation
- Provide content know-how and knowledge transfer
documentation
Definition of a Business Process Expert
Business process experts have the business knowledge and IT sway to make business process innovation happen in real time by adapting, composing, and executing end-to-end business processes using composition software tools and enterprise services.
SAP enables the business process expert to drive real-time business process innovation by providing a rich combination of industry business process and services content, and composition software tools from a proven business process platform.
More you will find here: https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/bpx?rid=/webcontent/uuid/cc0bd202-0b01-0010-9fbf-da3953eed4c2 [original link is broken]
Now I am interested to hear what others say!
Also I am sure there are much more questions/comments regarding Sinems blog.
Or do you have also experiences which you want to share with the BPX-Community?
Don't hesitate to use the forum for this!
Kind regards,
Sabine

Error in installing process chain from Business Content.

Dear Experts,
I have successfully installed the Technical Content from Business Content and now trying to install Content Master Data process chain for info package for the same but its showing error.
Technical Name for Process Chain : 0TCT_MD_C_FULL_P01
Error after instaling from BI Content : Process AND has no predecessor.
Finally, while checking in RSPC it comes the name of Process Chain but its not showing anything.
Also, one more thing is I am trying to install in development system and if that occurs successfully than transport to production as production directly don't wanted to do.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
NJ

ithink u have not activated the process chainafter creating the process chain u might have saved it with out activating the process cahin so that is the reason why it is showing name name but northing in the chain first activate the cahin then it iwill show
try this
Aravindan pagadala
satyam

Two way Asynchronous business process for Webservice to JDBC scenario

Hi Experts,
For the webservice to JDBC scenario, I have to use two way Asynchronous business process. Is it possible?
Scenario : Webservice to JDBC -> Async Call
JDBC to Webservice -> Async Call
I have already done with two way Synchronous. Here I would like to know about only Async call. Please provide your suggestions.
Is it recommended to use Async call when we have Synchronous option?
For the above requirement I have to create two separate services and in BPM, I have to call one by one..Is it correct?
Regards
Sara
Edited by: Sara D on Dec 18, 2007 8:05 AM

hi sara,
yes it is possible.
In receiver channel JDBC we have a special parameter "Exactly Once Handling " which is to assure async incoming data to be written only once to avoid redundancy.
Although Synchronous is "Best Effort" but it is considered to be "Worst Case". We can use Sync but try to use Async as much as possible to ensure system performance.
Ques : For the above requirement I have to create two separate services and in BPM, I have to call one by one..Is it correct?
yup you have to create two services and you are following right path but this scenario should be in two steps seperately.
Rergards,
Mandeep Virk

Business Process Scenario

Hello everyone,
Do we have anyone here who has done Business Process Validation in SAP SD and also assisted SQA team to assist them in validating process design documents.
The objective is to verify that requirements no matter functional or technical are completely covered and the process document supports complete solution and validate that process document supports software test plan.
Please share your experience or share with me how would you handle this?

Hi,
business scenarios (including key things to be touched - like business areas, company codes, doc types, interfaces, etc. Then build test cases using elements from the list -- pulling in multiple items from the list where it make sense). Not every test would necessarily include all the same elements. Each test case would be assigned a number or code -- and that wold be tracked on the basic business scenario list. Also found it valuable to include business users in development of theese test docs wherever possible.
Apart from that, the testing are at different level, such as Unit Testing - which will test only the functionality of particular process say creating PO. All errors may not come into knowledge at this point. Integration testing - which will test the entire process along with inegration within SAP and with interfaces. Here there are chances that additional problem area are identified and required to be fixed.
The process followed by me for testing Business Scenario for Order to Cash Cycle is demonstrated below"
Initial Testing will be as under:
1. Create Stock artificially (in test server / sand box only)
2. Create Sales Order
--> Here the common expected error would be as under:
a. Sales Order Type not assigned to Sales area
b. Pricing Procedure assignment not done.
c. Pricing Condition record not maintained
d. Material not maintained or extended to relevant combination
On successful creation of Sales Order, next step would be to create Delivery.
3. Create Delivery and PGI
I will test this scenario in multiple manner
a. Create Delivery from Sales Order
b. Create Delivery through Transaction Code VL01N
c. Create Delivery through Transaction Code VL10C
--> Here the common expected error is copy control setting not maintained, defalult Delivery type not maintained accurately in sales Order Type, etc.
On successful creation creation of Delivery, assuing Picking is done appropriately, doing PGI.
Here the challenge is the Account determination setting reguires to be completed, without which in most cases, it will not allow to do PGI.
4. Create Billing
I will test this scenario in multiple manner
a. Create Billing through VF01
b. Create Billing through Transaction Code VF04
Here the challenge is the Account determination may not be complete and Billing Document is saved without creating accounting document.
In Integration Testing:
1. Assure that material stock is availble in unrestricted stock through MM/PP.
2. Creating Sales Order smoothly
3. Creating Delivery, picking and PGI smmothly.
4. Create Billing smoothly with creation of accurate accounting document
Troubleshooting the errors encountered.
Here the objective is that the process should execute seamlessly.
similar exercise is done for other processes like Stock Transfer, Third Party & so on........
Thanks
Mk

Export Business Process in India Scenarios

Hi ASAP,
Can any ASAP guru gives me the Export Business Process in India Scenarios including ARE Doc. transaction.
With Regards & Thanks
Manoj Kumar

Dear ASAP,
The information which is given in CIN En Help, I am not able to understand, If you can give me the Process Flow as like given below for both Bonded and Un-Boned with ARE doc. creation, it will be much more help.
Process Flow for Standard Outgoing Mat. with Excise.
       1.    creates a sales order,
       2.   creates a delivery,and post the goods issue.
       3.   create commercial invoice with ref. of the delivery
       4.   Creates an excise invoice from the invoice.
With Worm Reagrds
Manoj

Invoke ODI Scenario from BPEL Process

Hi:
My problem is when invoke ODI Scenario from a BPEL Process, the error in ODI Designer is:
Return Code 7000
java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.sunopsis.dwg.dbobj.SnpSession.a(SnpSession.java)
at com.sunopsis.dwg.dbobj.SnpSession.y(SnpSession.java)
at com.sunopsis.dwg.dbobj.SnpSession.treatSessionPreTrt(SnpSession.java)
at com.sunopsis.dwg.dbobj.SnpSession.treatSession(SnpSession.java)
at com.sunopsis.dwg.cmd.DwgCommandScenario.treatCommand(DwgCommandScenario.java)
at com.sunopsis.dwg.cmd.DwgCommandBase.execute(DwgCommandBase.java)
at com.sunopsis.dwg.cmd.e.i(e.java)
at com.sunopsis.dwg.cmd.h.y(h.java)
at com.sunopsis.dwg.cmd.e.run(e.java)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
In the BPEL Console the result is OK and process complete, but in the task INVOKE Scenario send message:
<messages><ODI_REQUEST><part xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" name="part1"><invokeScenarioRequest xmlns="xmlns.oracle.com/odi/OdiInvoke/">
<RepositoryConnection xmlns=""
<JdbcDriver>oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver</JdbcDriver>
<JdbcUrl>jdbc:oracle:thin:@192.168.1.109:1521:ORCL</JdbcUrl>
<JdbcUser>dimaster</JdbcUser>
<JdbcPassword>sabr0sa</JdbcPassword>
<OdiUser>SUPERVISOR</OdiUser>
<OdiPassword>SUNOPSIS</OdiPassword>
<WorkRepository>TESTWORKREP1</WorkRepository>
</RepositoryConnection>
<Command xmlns="">
<ScenName>P_TRASPASOSOP09</ScenName>
<ScenVersion>2</ScenVersion>
<Context>Global</Context>
<LogLevel>5</LogLevel>
<SyncMode>0</SyncMode>
<SessionName/>
<Keywords/>
<Variables>
<Name/>
<Value xmlns:ns1="http://xmlns.oracle.com/Recepcion">
<ns1:Escenario>P_TRASPASOSOP09</ns1:Escenario>
<ns1:Version>2</ns1:Version>
<ns1:Contexto>Global</ns1:Contexto>
<ns1:ID>1</ns1:ID>
<ns1:NivelLogeo>5</ns1:NivelLogeo>
</Value>
</Variables>
</Command>
<Agent xmlns="">
<Host>192.168.1.109</Host>
<Port>20910</Port>
</Agent>
</invokeScenarioRequest>
</part></ODI_REQUEST><ODI_RESPONSE><part xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" name="part1"><odi:invokeScenarioResponse xmlns:odi="xmlns.oracle.com/odi/OdiInvoke/">
<odi:CommandResultType>
<odi:Ok>true</odi:Ok>
<odi:SessionNumber>445000</odi:SessionNumber>
</odi:CommandResultType>
</odi:invokeScenarioResponse>
</part></ODI_RESPONSE></messages>
You have response a problem?
Edited by: user2080320 on 16-oct-2008 11:18

Hi,
I'm also trying to implement the scenario of invoking ODI from BPEL process. I need a document with the steps to guide me thru the whole process.
Thanks in advance!.

How do you differentiate business process and business scenario

how do you differentiate business process and business scenario???
pls help

Google says;
A business scenario is a description of a business problem, which enables requirements to be viewed in relation to one another in the context of the overall problem. Without such a description to serve as context, the business value of solving the problem is unclear; the relevance of potential solutions is unclear and there is a danger of the solution being based on an inadequate set of requirements. A key factor in the success of any other major project is the extent to which it is linked to business requirements, and demonstrably supporting and enabling the enterprise to achieve its business objectives. Business scenarios are an important technique to help identify and understand business needs.
A business process -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_process

Transform from Business Process Expert to Value Scenario Experts !!!!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for