Transport Dependency check

Hi,
How to enable transport dependecy check for transport that are to be imported.
When i try to import a request from STMS_IMPORT, it should check for any dependecy of the transport which has been
used or modified the same object and it should prompt for pop showinf precdor import and status whether it has been
imported into system or not?
In general we would import request direclty from stms_import. here i would like to activate option or configure such
that any dependcy exsists they shud be bought to our notice by the system
Regrds
kumar

How can we do that, can you guide with steps
thanks in advance
kumar

Similar Messages

Solution Manager/Charm and Transport Dependency Check

Hello Everyone,
I apologize if this question has an obvious answer. I have searched SDN and could not get a 100% answer.
We are just now in the process of rolling out Charm/Solution Manager and I have noticed that it appears to not perform transport dependency checks. For example, let's say I am working on object ABC and have completed my testing (ready for transport to production) and then another developer also starts development on object ABC. When my change is moved to production, it will pick up the other developers modifications without giving a warning or an error that a dependency has been encountered between the two transport requests.
Does Charm/Solution Manager offer the option of producing a warning should a transport depedency be identified? If so, will someone explain (or point me to the appropriate documentation) how this can be set up?
Best Regards,
Scott

Hi Scott,
ChaRM supports imports from DEV->QAS->PRD by transport by transport requests level not by transport request task level. So don't worry(i.e., You can't import only your change of object ABC to production. It allows to import your change and other user's change of object ABC together to production).
This is how it works(if more than an user works on the same object):
1. Requester creates a support message from satelitte system to report a problem.
2. Service desk employee creates a change document because some changes need to be done on object ABC to correct that reported problem.
3. Change Manager approves the change document. So a normal correction is created automatically.
4. This normal correction is assigned to 2 developers(your scenario) like for an example DVPR1 and DVPR2.
5. DVPR1 creates a transport request and does some changes on object ABC. So a transport task will be created for DVPR1 under that transport request automatically.
6. When DVPR2 tries to do some changes on the same object ABC, a seperate transport task(not a transport request) will be created for DVPR2 under the same transport request because the object ABC is locked under the transport request. So DVPR2 can't create a separate transport request for the same object if any transport request is pending(not released).
7. Now object ABC will have one transport request. That transport request will have 2 transport tasks(1 for DVPR1 and 1 for DVPR2).
8. Each developer relases their transport task only(not transport request) once he/she completes his/her change on the object ABC.
9. DVPR1 or DVPR2 will change the status of normal correction to "Development Completed".
10. Now, IT operator or DVPR1 or DVPR2 can release the transport request. The transport request can be released only if all tasks are released under the same transport request.
(In this example: DVPR1 completed his change and released his transport task. Next DVPR2 completed and released his transport task).
11. Finally IT operator import the transport request to QAS and PRD.
Hope you are clear now. Let me know if you have any doubts.
Regards,
Sanjai

Program for transport dependency checks

Any body developed transport dependency program that would warn people of dependent transports? I hope this program would help greatly in managing transports and someone might have written an ABAP program.
Your help is appreciated.
Thanks
Rajesh Yadla

You can use SE03 transaction for the same.
Goto SE03 transaction - select Include objects in a transport request - check the radio button for selected objects and
add all your objects - execute - save in request.

Custom program for transport dependency

Any body developed transport dependency program that would warn people of dependent transports? I hope this program would help greatly in managing transports and someone might have written an ABAP program.
Your help is appreciated.
Thanks
Rajesh Yadla

1. PSAVE-FIELDNAME will use the old values in the FIELD. It will be used in cases when we have to do plausibility checks on the basis of new as well as old value, eg, we want to use dynamic action for employees whose status changes from 'inactive' to 'active'
2. Sequence no represents sequence no. If for a particular Infotype and FCode, we have to specify which step has to be performed first. Sequence no tells the system exactly this thing.
Regards
Lincoln

Foreign key dependency checking

Dear all:
I have a question about foreign key checking.
Let's say I have two Z table, one is master table and one is transaction table.
The master table contains a primary key named CustNo.
The transaction table have two primary keys named CustNo and OrderNo.
The CustNo has foreign key (mandt + CustNo) point to master table, with setting
"Key fields/candidates 1:N"
I expected that, delete record in master table should check if there is any dependency in the transaction table,
but I am wrong. I am able to delete anything in master table even there are records in transaction table using the same CustNo.
My question is, how can I make the dependency check?
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Hung Kai, Michael Cheng on Nov 3, 2008 5:29 AM

Hello,
For this u need to change the cardinality.
Below are the list of cardinalities and their functionality.Chack it and use the proper one.
The left side (n) of the cardinality is defined as follows:
n=1: There is exactly one record assigned to the check table for each record of the foreign key table.
n=C: The foreign key table may contain records which do not correspond to any record of the check table because the foreign key field is empty. This can occur for example if the field of the foreign key table is optional, in which case it does not have to be filled.
The right side (m) of the cardinality is defined as follows:
m=1: There is exactly one dependent record for each record of the check table.
m=C: There is at most one dependent record for each record of the check table.
m=N: There is at least one dependent record for each record of the check table.
m=CN: There may be any number of dependent records for each record of the check table.
Shafi

Enhancement request: dependency check cancel button

I like the cancel compile button in 9.0.3. It would be nice if you could also include cancel button for stopping during the dependency checking phase of a deploy.
PS I know you can kill the admin phase from the process window it's the phase in between the end of compiling and the admin phase.

I've filed enhancement 2579440 for tracking. Thank you for your feedback.

Better dependency checking in pacman

I'm often quite unhappy when I install some software and then getting errors like the following everywhere else:
error while loading shared libraries: libjpeg.so.7: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Ok, it usually means that I need to upgrade the whole system. But not only some packages could not be rebuilt in official repositories yet, but also this mistake can ocasionally lead to broken pacman (or ssh, or any other vital component of the system).
I guess it can be fixed. And I have two ideas how to fix that.
First way is to extend dependency checking. In perfect world all packages should write in their dependencies maximum version of package that is needed for this particular package. But almost always we don't know future. It could be fixed by downloading an additional file for already installed package, which says that this particular version of package is not compatible with versions of dependency starting from specified. That dependencies might then be used just like native dependencies of that package. These additional dependencies can be tracked both by hand and automatically (using ldd, namcap, whatever).
Second way is add freebsd-like dependencies on files for packages. So when packages are removed (upgraded) pacman could check if somebody relies on this file.
Probably file list could be maintained by makepkg using something like ldd internally. But may be file dependencies could be used not only for dynamic libraries.
Any thoughts?

But there are plenty of problems:
1. I want to setup a new little program. Am I supposed to wait to a full system upgrade?
2. There are no drivers for ATI video for current xorg server now. Do I need to add ALL dependencies of old catalyst to IgnorePkg recursively? Or I need to add xorg-server only and hope nothing will break?
3. Am I supposed to rebuild all packages from AUR after upgrade?
4. Seems there are lots of topics with such mistakes in this forum.

Transport Quality Check-How to design

Dear All,
During transport request migration from SAP development system to SAP production system, we are facing following challenges.
1. Parallel developments
Change1 on ObjectA is done on development and migrated to test. Another change2 on same objectA is done by other developer and he also send it to test. Change1 is overwritten and testing can not be performed.
2. Changes moved to production for critical business objects during a time when critical business activities are scheduled.The timing of change migration to production was wrong.Developer and tester were not aware of that critical business activity.
I request your suggestion on how quality check can be in place to avoid above situations.
What is the process following in your organization/client/project?
Thankful to All in Adv.
Brgds,
Pankaj

Hi Pankaj,
This is not a technical issue.
Only thing you can do is to make the developers aware of production impact.
may be remove their rights to perform imports in production... so that a system admin can control it.
You will have to figure out.. approval level in your organization to transport anything in production.
Also a fixed time to be decided for transport, may be weekly once.
Also for emergency transports, you must have a higher level of approval procedure in place.
Regards
Gaurav Desai

Checking Transport Order Checks Warning

Hi, experts
Before transport orders, I used to check them, but this is the first time I have warnings that I can't solve. Results window show me this: Code Inspector Checks = 60 messages
Checking list appear under folders:
1) Performance Checks -> Low-Perform. Parameter Transfers -> Information - > Message Code MESSAGEG.N
 Function ZXZ_FILE_MANAGE Row 222 Column 0
 The parameter "I_DSOURCE" is transferred as a value (VALUE).
 In general, this combination does not perform well. Reference
 transfer can be used without use reference transfer. use reference transfer.
This appear 6 times and no systems suggestions
2) Critical Statements -> Warning 
 - Message Code 0006
 Function Group ZXX_AX200 Include LZXX_AX200F01 Row 19 Column 2
 Use of Native SQL
This appear 60 times and systems suggestion for each one :
The message can be hidden using pseudocomment "#EC CI_EXECSQL but when I put at ending of ABAP code, and check syntax a warning is showed.
It's really urgent, please any help I will thank you, <REMOVED BY MODERATOR>.
Regards
mgg
Message was edited by:
 Alvaro Tejada Galindo

Hello Alvaro
(1) When you hand over variables by value then the system has to make a local copy of the variable. This, of course, is time-consuming. However, I believe in almost all cases you can ignore these warnings.
I prefer to use BY VALUE because I really want to make sure that any changes are transferred to the calling program only if the routine, function module or method has been finished properly.
(2) Native SQL should not be used because you may run into trouble if the database changes. There always try to stick to the open SQL statements.
Regards
Uwe

Scheduler dependency checking

While I see that one can assign Resource Groups to Job Classes for jobs running concurrently, is there a way to assure that one job task will not start up unless dependent jobs have finished?
What I want if for job_B to start only after job_A has finished. I do not want job_A to have to call job_B. I want there to be a tightness so that job_B will follow job_A either immediately or in a reasonable amount of time, but job_B will not fire if job_A is still running.
I can schedule job_A to run at the top of the hour. I can schedule job_B to run at 15 after the hour every 6th hour. I want to make sure however, that job_B will wait until job_A finishes in the event job_A takes longer than 14 minutes.
Does this functionality exist, or do I have to put a flag in some extra 'jobs_running' table for job_B to check, and then have it trigger job_B if it has checked, but could not run. It would be really nice if this were already built into the underlying DBA_ tables for Scheduler.
Please advise.
Thanks,
Scott Rappoport

Hi,
I have a similar question: Is there a possibility to lock a certain job in DBMS_SCHEDULER?
For example: I want to run a certain job every 10 minutes, but if after 10 minutes that job is still running, I don't want that the same job will run again, but that that job waits until the first job finishes its job.
I can do this using DBMS_LOCK by giving my job a lock that he releases when the job finishes. But isn't there a way that I can specify this directly in DBMS_SCHEDULER?

Transport Tool Check in STMS

Hello Experts,
I have problem integrating a Dev system into the production's domain controller. There is an UAT system as well. But this system can be integrated without problem. I used the exact same method to integrate Dev.
But when trying to 'accept' this into the domain, SAP system prompts me a message saying that this Dev is already in TPPARAM file.
Regardless, I continued and the Dev is shown as activated and I distributed.
When I do view this system in stms and perform 'Check Transport Tool', there Transport Profile is shown as not the domain controller's ...\sapmnt\trans but the Dev's ...\sapmnt\trans. This resulted in check failure for certain parts of this check eg. tp call could not connect to database and profile version is wrong.
What's puzzling is that the transdir parameter in the domain controller is pointing correctly to its global transport directory and dbhost,dbnames etc of the 3 systems are correct. UAT system has no problem.
So, I just like to find out how does the Check Tool get the location of the Transport Directory or Transport profile despite the tpparam and TP_DOmain_xxx.pfl already specifying correctly eg. transdir =
<domaincontrollerhost>\sapmnt\trans\
I tried overridding using Dev's instance parameter transport_exe to force point it to use <domaincontrollerhost> but to no avail.
Please enlighten. Thank you.
Regards,
Mirella

Dear Marcin,
Thanks! Am I right to say that by default, the DIR_TRANS is not & need not be set in instance/default/start profile explicitly as it is pointing to saptranshost?
Points awarded for your help.
Regards,
Mirella

Releasing a transport authority checks

Hi,
I'll be glad if you could help me with the following:
I guess project managers/basis/developers typically log onto development environment and use SE09 to release transports. However, a user could log onto production or QA and execute SE09 to do the same. Where are the authorizations to release checked? In the source system (development) or whereever the user has logged on?
I know that if a user tries to import a change (through STMS) then the authorizations from the target system are checked independently of where the user has logged on and this made me wonder what happens with releases.
Thanks in advance,
Jose

Hi Jose,
As you right said, if you are transporting a request the authorization for the same will be checked in the target system even though you are transporting a request in quality system from development, as it will login to quality from development.
But, incase of releasing a request you will be releasing the request in the source system in which it is created only. Thus for release it will check in source system only. i.e., if you are creating a request in development system then you can release that request in development system only, but not from quality or production.
Similarly, if a request is created in quality and production then it can be released from quality or production only. Hence it is mandatory to restrict the client settings in quality and production system against modification and transport request creation.
Even after restricting the client settings, if you feel that you want to restrict the release authorization in quality and production system you can do that from S_TRANSPRT (Currently, I do not have access to system....not sure about correctness of TRANSPRT. Please check for similar object for transport related)
Hope clarified.
Thanks & Regards,
Sharath Babu M

Java Dependency Checking

Hi all,
Can anyone suggest me a good Java tool to check dependenciess? I had a look at JDepend but it probably doesn't suffice. We have a enterprise application composed of many other applications, I am not sure how good the abstractions are in terms of coupling or cohesiveness since I am new to this app. We are trying to maintain a dependency list of methods and classes so that when someone is trying to change something in a method in one application they know what all gets impacted i tnhe same application or the another application. Please suggest some good tools which can help me with this.
Thank you ver much,
Amnesiac.

I found something called Structure101, hope it helps. Please suggest me if there are any better options.
Thank you.

Oxygen-icons dependency check error

Hi!
I tried to upgrade my system this morning and got this
error: cannot resolve "oxygen-icons", a dependency of "kdebase-runtime"
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: kdebase-runtime: requires oxygen-icons
Is it a bug, or just I'm doing something wrong? Tried to switch mirrors, but to no avail.

Wait one or two more days. Its a big update and it takes time until the mirrors catch up.

Dependency check for package being ported

Looking to port a program from Debian and want to make sure I get all my dependencies right. But there is no real scale or database to work with. Below are the dependencies for my package... Any help making sure I cover all these would be greatly appreciated.
mono-runtime,
libmono-system-xaml4.0-cil,
libgtk2.0-cil-dev,
libwebkit1.1-cil,
libmono-system-web4.0-cil,
libmono-system-data-linq4.0-cil,
libmono-wcf3.0-cil

I suspect most of those are in [extra]/mono. Arch does not split packages endlessly as debian does. You can verify each one, here is an example:
1) find the package at debian.org and look at the file list:
http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/all/l … l/filelist
2) use pkgfile on any of those files:
$ pkgfile /usr/lib/mono/4.0/System.Data.Linq.dll
extra/mono
3) Have a beer, and remember to buy one for the arch devs too, cause you're done.
Last edited by Trilby (2013-10-21 22:04:34)

Transport Dependency check

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for